Report Control Room Lawe 220218-RE0

JOB NO DOC. NO. REV.
171002 161002-RPT-S-GEN-001-0 0
LAPORAN PENYUSUNAN BASIC ENGINEERING DESIGN UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN

FASILITAS CONTROL ROOM PROYEK RDMP RU-V BALIKPAPAN
DRAFT REPORT
LAPORAN DESAIN CONTROL ROOM LAWE LAWE
DRAFT REPORT
Doc.No. Consultant
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001
Doc.No. Client
-
Proj. ID
171002
Proj. Title
PENYUSUNAN BASIC ENGINEERING DESIGN UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN FASILITAS
CONTROL ROOM PROYEK RDMP RU-V BALIKPAPAN
Contract No.
UM.58/10/24/PI-15.TU
Client
PERTAMINA
Proj. Location
Balikpapan
Indonesia
2018
0 05-01-2017 ALL FOR REVIEW / FOR APPROVAL DA

By Date
REV DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION PREP’D CHK’D APP’D
CLIENT
PROSEDUR OTORISASI
DISIAPKAN:
NAMA TTD
POSISI TGL
DIPERIKSA:
NAMA TTD
POSISI TGL
DISETUJUI:
NAMA TTD
POSISI TGL
SHEET OF CONTROL
REV. NO DATE INFORMATION

PENYUSUNAN BASIC ENGINEERING
DESIGN UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN
FASILITAS CONTROL ROOM PROYEK
RDMP RU-V BALIKPAPAN
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
CONTROL ROOM LAWE LAWE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 5 Of 79
TABLE OF CONTENT
1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................... 9
1.1 GENERAL........................................................................................................................................................................ 9
1.2 LOCATION.......................................................................................................................................................................9
1.3 LANGUAGE..................................................................................................................................................................... 9
2.0 DESIGN CRITERIA.................................................................................................................................................. 10
2.1 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................................................................10
2.2 SOFTWARE....................................................................................................................................................................12
2.3 DESIGN LIFE..................................................................................................................................................................12
2.4 MATERIAL PROPERTIES...................................................................................................................................................12
2.4.1 Concrete Material................................................................................................................................................12
2.4.2 Steel Structure.....................................................................................................................................................14
2.4.3 Reinforcement Bars.............................................................................................................................................15
2.4.4 Steel Material......................................................................................................................................................15
2.4.5 Concrete Spun Pile...............................................................................................................................................16
3.0 DESIGN LOAD....................................................................................................................................................... 17
3.1 DEAD LOAD.................................................................................................................................................................. 17
3.2 LIVE LOAD....................................................................................................................................................................17
3.3 EQUIPMENT LOAD..........................................................................................................................................................22
3.4 RAIN LOAD...................................................................................................................................................................22
3.5 WIND LOAD..................................................................................................................................................................23
3.6 SEISMIC LOAD...............................................................................................................................................................23
3.7 BLAST LOAD..................................................................................................................................................................25
3.8 COMBINATION OF LOADS................................................................................................................................................ 25
4.0 UPPERSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................ 27
4.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................................................................27
4.2 STRUCTURE MODELING...................................................................................................................................................27
4.3 UPPERSTRUCTURE MATERIAL...........................................................................................................................................27
4.5 APLICATION LOAD..........................................................................................................................................................30
4.5.1 Super Dead Load..................................................................................................................................................32
4.5.2 Live Load..............................................................................................................................................................33
4.5.3 Wind Load............................................................................................................................................................33
4.5.4 Rain Load.............................................................................................................................................................35
4.6 ANALYSIS STRUCTURE.....................................................................................................................................................36
4.6.1 General................................................................................................................................................................36
4.6.2 Reinforcement.....................................................................................................................................................36
4.6.3 K 400x400............................................................................................................................................................36
4.6.4 B 400x600............................................................................................................................................................38
4.6.5 B 300x400............................................................................................................................................................41
4.6.6 B 200x300............................................................................................................................................................44
4.6.7 Slab 120 mm........................................................................................................................................................46
4.6.8 Deflection Structure.............................................................................................................................................47
5.0 SUBSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................................... 49
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 6 Of 79
5.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................................................................49
5.2 STRUCTURE MODELING...................................................................................................................................................49
5.3 SUBSTRUCTURE MATERIAL...............................................................................................................................................49
5.5 APPLICATION LOAD........................................................................................................................................................51
5.5.1 Super Dead Load..................................................................................................................................................51
5.5.2 Live Load..............................................................................................................................................................52
5.6 ANALYSIS STRUCTURE.....................................................................................................................................................53
5.6.1 Slab 150 mm........................................................................................................................................................53
5.6.2 TB.400x600 mm...................................................................................................................................................55
5.6.3 TB.300x400 mm...................................................................................................................................................57
6.0 GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................................... 61
6.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................................................................61
6.2 DATA BORING LOG........................................................................................................................................................ 61
6.3 ANALYSIS OF DEEP FOUNDATION BASED ON SPT CORRELATIONS............................................................................................64
6.3.1 Axial Pile Capacity A Driven Spun Pile.................................................................................................................64
6.3.2 Skin Friction Resistance.......................................................................................................................................64
6.3.3 End Bearing Capacity...........................................................................................................................................66
6.3.4 Plugged vs. Unplugged and Open vs. Closed end Steel Pipe Piles.......................................................................68
6.3.5 Uplift Capacity.....................................................................................................................................................69
6.3.6 Allowable Bearing Capacity of Pile (Pall)............................................................................................................69
6.3.7 Criteria of Driving Pile..........................................................................................................................................70
6.3.8 Lateral Capacity...................................................................................................................................................70
6.4 ANALYSIS OF FOUNDATION CONTROL ROOM LAWE LAWE......................................................................................................74
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 7 Of 79
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure 3-1 Ss, Mapped MCER spectral response acceleration parameter at short period, Site Class SB...............23
Figure 3-2 S1, Mapped MCER spectral response acceleration parameter at a period of 1 s, Site Class SB............24
Figure 3-3 PGA, Mapped MCEG peak ground acceleration, Site Class SB..........................................................24
Figure 4-1 Material Identification................................................................................................................... 27
Figure 4-2 K1 – 400x400.................................................................................................................................. 28
Figure 4-3 B1 – 400x600.................................................................................................................................. 28
Figure 4-4 B2 – 300x400.................................................................................................................................. 29
Figure 4-5 B3 – 200x300.................................................................................................................................. 29
Figure 4-6 Pelat Lantai 120 mm...................................................................................................................... 29
Figure 4-7 Slab 150 mm.................................................................................................................................. 30
Figure 4-8 Model 3D – 1.................................................................................................................................. 31
Figure 4-9 Model 3D - 2................................................................................................................................... 31
Figure 4-10 Plan Sloof..................................................................................................................................... 32
Figure 4-11 SDL Finishing Load.................................................................................................................... 33
Figure 4-12 Roof Live Load............................................................................................................................ 33
Figure 4-13 Wind Load –X.............................................................................................................................. 34
Figure 4-14 Wind Load - Y.............................................................................................................................. 35
Figure 4-15 Rain Load..................................................................................................................................... 35
Figure 4-16 PCACOL K 500x500 -1................................................................................................................ 37
Figure 4-17 PCACOL K 500x500 -2................................................................................................................ 37
Figure 5-1 Properti of Concrete Material....................................................................................................... 49
Figure 5-2 Slab Properties 150 mm............................................................................................................... 50
Figure 5-3 TB1 – 400x600............................................................................................................................... 50
Figure 5-4 TB2 – 300x400............................................................................................................................... 51
Figure 5-5 Model TB dan Floor Slab............................................................................................................. 51
Figure 5-6 Aplication SDL at Slab 150 mm.................................................................................................... 52
Figure 5-7 Aplication SDL at tie beam........................................................................................................... 52
Figure 5-8 Aplication Live Load at Slab 150 mm.......................................................................................... 53
Figure 6-1 Layout Titik Boring Log................................................................................................................ 61
Figure 6-2 Boring Log B-28 (Sheet 1)............................................................................................................ 62
Figure 6-3 Boring Log B-28 (Sheet 2)............................................................................................................ 63
Figure 6-4 Beraing Capacity of Axial............................................................................................................. 64
Figure 6-5 Faktor Adhesi API Metode 2 (1986)............................................................................................. 65
Figure 6-6 Berezantsev’s Bearing Capacity Factor, Nq...............................................................................68
Figure 6-7 Plug and Unplug End Illustration................................................................................................. 68
Figure 6-8 P-Y Curve for Laterally Loaded Pile (After Matlock, 1970).........................................................71
Figure 6-9 Determining Shape of P-Y Curve in Soft to Firm Clay (After Matlock, 1970)...........................72
Figure 6-10 Obtaining Critical Depth for Laterally Loaded Pile in Cohesionless Soil...............................73
Figure 6-11 Determining Shape of P-Y Curve in Sand (After Reese, 1970)................................................73
Figure 6-12 Allowable Bearing Capacity of Control Room Lawe Lawe - CSP 500 T90 mm – BH-81........75
Figure 6-13 Deflection Vs Depth And Moment Maximum Control Room Lawe Lawe – CSP 500 mm – ......
B-28....................................................................................................................................... 76
Figure 6-14 Vertical load vs pile settlement Control Room Lawe Lawe – CSP 500 mm – BH-81.............76
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 8 Of 79
LIST OF TABLE
Table 2-1 Concrete Grade............................................................................................................................... 12

Table 2-2 Deflection Limit of Reinforced Concrete Member based on SNI 2847-2013..............................13
Table 2-3 Permissible Crack Width in Reinforced Concrete According to ACI Committee......................13
Table 2-4 Concrete Cover............................................................................................................................... 14
Table 2-5 Tebal Minimum Selimut Beton Pracetak.......................................................................................14
Table 2-6 Deflection Limitation on Steel Structure for Building.................................................................15
Table 2-7 Reinforcement Bars........................................................................................................................ 15
Table 3-1 Minimum Uniformly Distributed Live Loads, Lo and Minimum Concentrated Live Loads........18
Table 3-2 Site-Specific Earthquake Load Parameter....................................................................................25
Table 4-1 Gaya Dalam K 400x400................................................................................................................... 36
Table 4-2 Gaya Dalam B 400x600................................................................................................................... 38
Table 4-5 Area Force Slab 120 mm................................................................................................................ 46
Table 4-6 Summary Defleksi Struktur............................................................................................................ 48
Table 5-1 Gaya Dalam Slab Lantai 150 mm................................................................................................... 53
Table 6-1 Value of the Friction Angle For Certain Soil.................................................................................66
Table 6-2 Value of Capacity for Certain Soil................................................................................................. 67
Table 6-3 Join Reaksi Control Room Lawe Lawe CSP 500 T90 mm...........................................................74
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 9 Of 79
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
This document contained about design criteria in the design of buildings and other structure. The
purpose of this document is to present design criteria to be used in design.
The buildings and other structure are Lawe-lawe Control Room.
1.2 Location
Location of this project at Balikpapan, Indonesia.Unit
All units are in SI unit.
1.3 Language
Language in this report will in English.
Perencanaan Sarana & Fasilitas Gedung New
HSSE Office Pertamina Refinery Unit V
Balikpapan
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 10 Of 79
2.0 DESIGN CRITERIA
2.1 References
Some references document has been used in developing this design as well as this report. They
are as follow: The design is to be carried out based on the recommendations given in the
following standard and code of practice, which are :
1. The following codes and standards referred to throughout this design criteria
document are to be followed. Should other codes or standards be required by the
OWNER or by other governing authorities in the area of jurisdiction, those should then be also
followed by the Contractor.
2. The publications listed below form a part of this document to the extent referenced.
Documents shall be the current edition or revision at the time of contract award,
unless otherwise expressly stated.
3. American Concrete Institute (ACI)
4. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)
5. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 11 Of 79
6. ASTM International (ASTM)

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 12 Of 79
7. American Nationa Standards Institute (ANSI)
8. Indonesian National Standard and Regulation
2.2 Software
Software used for design the building structure is SAP2000. Verification on the calculation will be
assisted by spreadsheet software.
2.3 Design Life

Design life of this building and other structure are 25 years.
2.4 Material Properties
2.4.1 Concrete Material
Concrete grade is as follow:
Table 2-1 Concrete Grade

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 13 Of 79
Specified Minimum
Structure Type Compressive Strength
of Concrete, fc' psi (MPa)
Cast-in-place frames and superstructures 4000 (28)
Foundations 4000 (28) 4000 (28)
Reinforced concrete precast elements 4000 (28) 4000 (28)
Prestressed elements; prestressed piles 5000 (35) 5000 (35)
Water containment structures (sumps, lift
4000 (28)
stations, cooling tow ers)
Slabs-on-ground 4000 (28) 4000 (28)
Mud mat (seal slab) and concrete fill 2000 (14) 2000 (14)
Concrete in splash zone area 5000 (35) 5000 (35)
Deflection Control
The deflection of structural member, i.e, plate and beam should be in accordance with the SNI
2847-2013 as following:
Table 2-2 Deflection Limit of Reinforced Concrete Member based on SNI 2847-2013
Jenis komponen struktur Lendutan yang diperhitungkan Batas lendutan
Atap datar yang tidak menahan atau tidak Lendutan seketika akibat beban hidup (L) a
disatukan dengan komponen nonstruktural
ℓ
yang mungkin akan rusak oleh lendutan yang 180
besar
Lantai yang tidak menahan atau tidak Lendutan seketika akibat beban hidup (L) ℓ
disatukan dengan komponen nonstruktural
yang mungkin akan rusak oleh lendutan yang 360
besar
Konstruksi atap atau lantai yang menahan atau Bagian dari lendutan total yang terjadi b
disatukan dengan komponen nonstruktural setelah pemasangan komponen
ℓ
yang mungkin akan rusak oleh lendutan yang nonstruktural (jumlah dari lendutan jangka 480
besar panjang, akibat semua beban tetap yang
Kontruksi atap atau lantai yang menahan atau bekerja, dan lendutan seketika, akibat d
disatukan dengan komponen nonstruktural penambahan beban hidup)c
ℓ
yang mungkin tidak akan rusak oleh lendutan 240
yang besar
a
Batasan ini tidak dimaksudkan untuk mencegah kemungkinan penggenangan air. Kemungkinan penggenangan air
harus diperiksa dengan melakukan perhitungan lendutan, termasuk lendutan tambahan akibat adanya
penggenangan air tersebut, dan mempertimbangkan pengaruh jangka panjang dari beban yang selalu bekerja,
lawan lendut, toleransi konstruksi dan keandalan sistem drainase.
b
Batas lendutan boleh dilampaui bila langkah pencegahan kerusakan terhadap komponen yang ditumpu atau yang
disatukan telah dilakukan.
c
Lendutan jangka panjang harus dihitung berdasarkan ketentuan 11.5(2(5)) atau 11.5(4(2)), tetapi boleh dikurangi
dengan niali lendutan yang terjadi sebelum penamahan komponen non-struktural. Besarnya nilai lendutan ini harus
ditentukan berdasarkan data teknis yang dapat diterima berkenaan dengan karakteristik hubungan waktu dan
lendutan dari komponen struktur yang serupa dengan komponen struktur yang ditinjau.
d
Tetapi tidak boleh lebih besar dari toleransi yang disediakan untuk komponen non-struktur. Batasan ini boleh
dilampaui bila ada lawan lendut yang disediakan sedemikian hingga lendutan total dikurangi lawan lendut tidak
melebihi batas lendutan yang ada.
Crack Control
Due to environmental condition, it is necessary to limit the crack width of structural member, i.e,
concrete floor and beam. Thecrack widht control was taken account based on the ACI committee
as presented in the following table:
Table 2-3 Permissible Crack Width in Reinforced Concrete According to ACI Committee
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 14 Of 79
Exposure Condition Maximum Allowable Crack Width

in (mm)
Dry air or protective membrane 0.016 (0.41)
Humidity, moist air, soil 0.012 (0.30)
Deicing chemicals 0.007 (0.18)
Seawater and seawater spray, wetting and drying 0.006 (0.15)
Water-retaining structures 0.004 (0.10)
Concrete Cover
Concrete cover for all structural elements are shown in the following table, in accordance with the
SNI 2847-2013
Table 2-4 Concrete Cover

Tebal Selimut
Minimum (mm)
Beton yang dicor langsung di atas tanah dan selalu berhubungan dengan tanah 75
Beton yang berhubungan dengan tanah atau cuaca :
Batang D 19 hingga D56 50
Batang D 16, jaring kawat polos P 16 atau kawat ulir D 16 dan yang lebih kecil 40
Beton yang tidak langsung berhubungan dengan cuaca atau beton tidak langsung
berhubungan dengan tanah :
Pelat, dinding, pelat berusuk :
Batang D 44 dan D 56 40
Batang D 36 dan yang lebih kecil 20
Balok, kolom :
Tulangan utama, pengikat, sengkang, lilitan spiral 40
Komponen struktur cangkang, pelat lipat :
Batang D 19 dan yang lebih besar 20
Batang D 16, jaring kawat polos P16 atau ulir D 16 dan yang lebih kecil 15
Table 2-5 Tebal Minimum Selimut Beton Pracetak

Tebal selimut
Minimum (mm)
Beton yang berhubungan dengan tanah atau cuaca :
Panel dinding :
Batang D 44 dan batang D 56 40
Batang D 36 dan batang yang lebih kecil 20
Komponen struktur lainnya :
Batang D 19 sampai batang D 36 40
Batang D 16, jaring kawat polos P16 atau ulir D 16 dan yang lebih kecil 30
Beton yang tidak langsung berhubungan dengan cuaca atau tanah:
Pelat, dinding, pelat berusuk :
Batang D 36 dan batang yang lebih kecil 15
Balok kolom :
Tulangan utama a
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 15 Of 79
Tebal selimut
Minimum (mm)
Sengkang pengikat, sengkang dengan lilitan spiral 10
Komponen cangkang, pelat lipat :
Batang D 19 dan batang yang lebih besar 15
Batang D 16, jaring kawat polos P16 atau kawat ulir D 16 dan yang lebih kecil 10
a  db, tetapi tidak kurang dari 15 mm dan tidak lebih dari 40 mm
2.4.2 Steel Structure
Limitation of steel structure based in SNI-03-1729-2002, “Tata Cara Perencanaan Struktur Baja
Untuk Bangunan Gedung”, table 6.4-1, page 15.
Table 2-6 Deflection Limitation on Steel Structure for Building
2.4.3 Reinforcement Bars
The reinforcement shall comply with the requirement of ASTM A615 or SNI Standard.
Table 2-7 Reinforcement Bars
fy = 240 MPa
Rebar < 13 (plain)
Es = 210,000 MPa
fy = 390 MPa
Rebar ≥ 13 (deform)
2.4.4 Steel Material
The steel material shall comply to ASTM A36 specification for BJ37 with minimum yield strength
(fy) is no less than 240 MPa and ultimatte strength is no less than 390 MPa.All nuts and bolt shall
comply with ASTM Grade A325 High Strength Structural Bolts.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 16 Of 79
2.4.5 Concrete Spun Pile
The concrete spun pile will be in accordance to SNI 03-2847-2013 with compressive strength at
28 days f’c=500 kg/cm2 or equivalent to K-600.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 17 Of 79
3.0 DESIGN LOAD
3.1 Dead Load

Dead load as the selfweight of the structural members. Specific gravity of material used in this
structure is as follow:
Concrete = 2.400 ton/m3
Steel = 7.850 ton/m3
3.2 Live Load

Live loads shall consist of assumed unit loading deemed sufficient to provide for movable or
transitory load such as people, portable equipment, fixtures and parts lay down. Live load can be
uniforrmly distributed live load or concentrated live load. Uniformly live load and concentrated live
load applied in this project in accordance with SNI-1727-2013, “Beban Minimum Untuk
Perancangan Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain” table 4-1, page 25.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 18 Of 79
Table 3-8 Minimum Uniformly Distributed Live Loads, Lo and Minimum Concentrated Live Loads
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 19 Of 79
Table Con’t
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 20 Of 79
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 21 Of 79
Table Con’t
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 22 Of 79
Tabel Con’t
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 23 Of 79
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 24 Of 79
Refer to 26070-203-3DR-S04D-J0001 Design CriteriaFor Structure and Foundations

Uniformly
Specific Use Distributed Load
psf (kPa)
Control room floors, labs,
150 (7.2)
and sw itchgear rooms
Compressor operating level
150 (7.2)
floors including platfors
Access platforms and
75 (3.6)
w alkw ays
Operating platforms, stairs,
and exit w ays 100 (4.8)
3.3 Equipment Load

Equipment load applied in accordance with client requirement or the needs of each buildings and
other structure.
3.4 Rain Load

Rain load applied refers to the SNI-1727-2013, “Beban Minimum Untuk Perancangan Bangunan
Gedung dan Struktur Lain” page 38. Each portion of a roof shall be designed to sustain the load
of all rainwater that will accumulate on it if the primary drainage system for that portion is blocked
plus the uniform load caused by water that rises above the inlet of the secondary drainage
system at its design flow.
R=5.2(d s +d h )
¿ SI : R=0.0098(d s + dh )
Symbols : R = rain load on the undeflected roof, in lb/ft 2 (kN/m2). When the phrase
“underflected roof” is used, deflection from loads (including dead loads)
shall not be considered when determining the amount of rain on the roof.
ds = depth of water on the underflected roof up to the inlet of the secondary
drainage system when the primary drainage system is blocked (i.e., the
static head), in in (mm).
dh = additional depth of water on the undeflected roof above the inlet of the
secondary drainage system at its design flow (i.e., the hydraulic head), in
in (mm).
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 25 Of 79
3.5 Wind Load

Wind Load applied refers to pada SNI-1727-2013, “Beban Minimum Untuk Perancangan
Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain”.
The basic parameter for determining wind loads are:
1. Basic wind speed, V (section 26.5) = 35 m/s
2. Wind directionally factor, Kd (section 26.6)
3. Exposure category (section 26.7) = C
4. Topographic factor, Kzt if not available, used Kzt=1(section 26.8)
5. Gust effect factor, G (section 26.9)
6. Enclosure classification, (section 26.10)
7. Internal pressure coefficient, (GCpi) (section 26-11)
3.6 Seismic Load

Seismic design condition is that the structure will have minor damage after earthquake taken
place. This is obtained by limitting the structural deflection due to seismic load.
Seismic analysis was performed using dynamic response spectra refers to SNI 03-1726-2012,
“Standar Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung”.
Figure 3-1 Ss, Mapped MCER spectral response acceleration parameter at short period, Site Class SB
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 26 Of 79
Figure 3-2 S1, Mapped MCER spectral response acceleration parameter at a period of 1 s, Site Class SB
Figure 3-3 PGA, Mapped MCEG peak ground acceleration, Site Class SB
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 27 Of 79
Seismic analysis in accordance to standard SNI 03-1726-2012, “Standar Perencanaan

Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung”
Table 3-9 Site-Specific Earthquake Load Parameter

Site Class D E
Design Spectral Acceleration Parameter
0.222 0.323
at Short Period, Sds
Design Spectral Acceleration Parameter
0.184 0.163
at 1 Second Period, Sd1
3.7 Blast Load

The following types of explosions: Vapor Cloud Explosion, Pressure Vessel Explosion,
Condensed Phase Chemical Explosion, and Dust Explosion. See ASCE 41088 for more
guidance on blast loads.
3.8 Combination of Loads

The basic load combinations provided in ASCE/SEI 7 shall be followed for the design of
buildings, structures, and foundations
The load conditions shown in Table 7, Load Combination Matrix, shall be considered in the
design of buildings, structures, and foundations. Other, possibly more severe load conditions may
exist and shall be considered in design, where applicable.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 28 Of 79
Design load combination refer to 26070-203-3DR-S04D-J0001 Design Criteria for Structure and
Foundation (page 58-64)
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 29 Of 79
4.0 UPPERSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS

4.1 General
Structured modeling using SAP2000 Program Version 14 and Manua
4.2 Structure Modeling
The preparation of the 3D model structure used in this analysis is explained at the bottom of this.
Structures are analyzed as a whole on a critical combination, from vertical, longitudinal and
lateral loads. Dimensions on 3D models will be built into one component that is intact, rigid and
connected. The output data that can be generated from this program is the maximum and
minimum axial force, shear force and deflection for each element to be designed and inspected.
At this stage required data of building size as follows:
Model Type : Lawe-Lawe Control Room
Landscape Length, L : 17.0 m
Tower width, w : 13.0 m
Building height : 5.00 m
4.3 Upperstructure Material

The next step is the type of material to be used in the structure model. In this example the
material to be used is concrete with fc '25 MPa. Material identifier begins to open the define
menu, material, steel, modify / show material.
Figure 4-4 Material Identification

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 30 Of 79

After identifying the next material properties we can identify the size of the cross section to be
used
Figure 4-5 K1 – 400x400
Figure 4-6 B1 – 400x600

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 31 Of 79
Figure 4-7 B2 – 300x400
Figure 4-8 B3 – 200x300

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 32 Of 79
Figure 4-9 Pelat Lantai 120 mm
Figure 4-10 Slab 150 mm
4.5 Aplication Load

3-D structure modeling for warehouse chemical can be seen as follows.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 33 Of 79
Figure 4-11 Model 3D – 1
Figure 4-12 Model 3D - 2

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 34 Of 79
Figure 4-13 Plan Sloof
4.5.1 Super Dead Load
SDL loads are on the floor. For SDL load plank area consists of SDL finishing.
Asumsi finishing 5 cm = 0.05 m
So, SDL finishing = 0.05 m x 2.4 ton/m3 = 0.12 ton/m2
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 35 Of 79
Figure 4-14 SDL Finishing Load
4.5.2 Live Load
Live load consists of a live load on the roof of 100 kg / m2 = 0.1 ton / m2, and the living load of
the room is 4.79 KN / m2 = 0.48 ton / m2
The following is a live load application
Figure 4-15 Roof Live Load
4.5.3 Wind Load

The following is the calculation for wind loads based on SNI 2013
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 36 Of 79
Wind wall Wind wall

X direction - in Z- direction - out
length = 4.5 m length = 12 m
mid = qz x Gcpi x length mid = qh x Gcpi x length
= 1.9412 x +0.18 x 4.5 = 1.6553 x -0.18 x 12
= 1.5724 KN/m = -3.575 KN/m
= 0.1572 ton/m = -0.358 ton/m
edge = qz x Gcpi x length edge = qh x Gcpi x length
= 1.9412 x +0.18 x 2.25 = 1.6553 x -0.18 x 6
= 0.7862 KN/m = -1.788 KN/m
= 0.0786 ton/m = -0.179 ton/m
X direction - out Roof

length = 4.5 m length = 0.2 m
mid = qh x Gcpi x length mid = qh x Gcpi x length
= 1.6553 x -0.18 x 4.5 = 1.6553 x +0.18 x 0.2
= -1.341 KN/m = 0.0596 KN/m
= -0.134 ton/m = 0.006 ton/m
edge = qh x Gcpi x length edge = qh x Gcpi x length
= 1.6553 x -0.18 x 2.25 = 1.6553 x +0.18 x 0.1
= -0.67 KN/m = 0.0298 KN/m
= -0.067 ton/m = 0.003 ton/m
Figure 4-16 Wind Load –X

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 37 Of 79
Figure 4-17 Wind Load - Y
4.5.4 Rain Load
The assumption for rain load is 50 kg / m2

Application of rain load on this model can be seen as follows
Figure 4-18 Rain Load

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 38 Of 79
4.6 Analysis Structure
4.6.1 General
The results of structural analysis consist of:

• Calculation of Reinforcement
• Deflection of structures;
4.6.2 Reinforcement
The calculation of reinforcement consists of

1. Calculation of K 400x400 reinforcement
2. Calculation of B 400x600 reinforcement
5. Calculation of floor slab reinforcement 150 mm
6. Calculation of roof slab reinforcement 120
4.6.3 K 400x400
Summary frames force and reinforcement calculation of Column 400x400 can be seen below.
Table 4-10 Gaya Dalam K 400x400
TABLE: Element Forces - Frames
OutputCase CaseType P V2 V3 T M2 M3
Text Text Tonf Tonf Tonf Tonf-m Tonf-m Tonf-m
Max 0.6948 6.7772 3.9628 0.08609 9.07722 20.35156
ENV ULS
Min -52.2292 -6.8258 -3.6916 -0.02694 -10.90793 -19.40797
Calculation column 400x400 used SPColumn Program. Based on calculation reinforcement

column 400x400 used 12D19
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 39 Of 79
Figure 4-19 PCACOL K 500x500 -1
Figure 4-20 PCACOL K 500x500 -2

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 40 Of 79
4.6.4 B 400x600
Summary frames force and reinforcement calculation of B 400x600 can be seen below.
Table 4-11 Gaya Dalam B 400x600
Max 1.6154 14.9306 0.436 3.657 0.202 23.7459
ENV ULS
Min -4.3553 -12.336 -0.595 -3.8751 -0.213 -25.653
Below is the calculation of B 400x600 reinforcement
Section Capacity
Span Rebar Calculations
Data: Calculation:
h = 600 mm I) Asy for condition es' = ey
b = 400 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 169.69 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 144.24 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 1,471,212.07 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 413,384.90 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 1,884,596.97 N
Clear cover = 40 mm Asy = 4,832.30 mm2 compression bar not yield
Dia. of Stirrup = 13 mm
Tens ile Bar : II) As(max) allowed
As(act) = 2,268.23 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 19 mm Xb = 304.90 mm
No. of bar = 8 X(max) = 228.68 mm
No. of layer = 2 a(max) = 194.37 mm
No. of bar in layer 1 = 4 es' = 0.0022
No. of bar in layer 2 = 4 fs' = 162.13 MPa
No. of bar in layer 3 = 0
Clear distance between layer-1 = 50 mm Cc = 1,982,613.80 N
Clear distance between layer-2 0 mm
CG distance between layer = 40.00 mm Cs = 154,950.36 N
d = 497.50 mm T(max) = 2,137,564.16 N
As(max) = 5,480.93 mm2 OK
Compression Bar
As'(act) = 1,134.11 mm2 III) Mn(act) Calculation

dia. = 19 mm A = 8,670.00 N/mm
No. of bar = 4 B = -233,060.62 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -42,529,310.55 N-mm
No. of bar in layer 1 = 4 X = 84.76 mm
No. of bar in layer 2 = 0 a = 72.04 mm
Clear distance between layer-1 = 50 mm es' = 0.0008
Clear distance between layer-2 = 0 mm
CG distance between layer = 0.00 mm fs' = 162.13 MPa
d' = 62.50 mm Cc = 734,841.26 N
Cs = 154,950.36 N
Due to Loading: Ty = 889,791.62 N
Mu = 23.75 t-m Mn(act) = 406,516,753.51 N-mm
Mn = 29.68 t-m Mn(act) = 41.48 t-m OK

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 41 Of 79
Based on calculation reinforment at span used 4 + 4D19 for tensile reinforcemet and 4D19
compression reinforcement.
Section Capacity
Support Rebar Calculations
Data: Calculation:
b = 400 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 169.69 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 144.24 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 1,471,212.07 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 413,384.90 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 1,884,596.97 N
Tensile Bar : II) As(max) allowed
As(act) = 2,268.23 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 19 mm Xb = 304.90 mm
No. of bar = 8 X(max) = 228.68 mm
d = 497.50 mm T(max) = 2,137,564.16 N
As(max) = 5,480.93 mm2 OK
Compression Bar

dia. = 19 mm A = 8,670.00 N/mm
No. of bar = 4 B = -233,060.62 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -42,529,310.55 N-mm
d' = 62.50 mm Cc = 734,841.26 N
Cs = 154,950.36 N
Mu = 25.65 t-m Mn(act) = 406,516,753.51 N-mm
Mn = 32.07 t-m Mn(act) = 41.48 t-m OK
Based on calculation reinforment at support used 4 + 4D19 for tensile reinforcemet and 4D19
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 42 Of 79
Cek stirrup
SUPPORT SPAN
Vu = 14.93 ton Vu = 9.95 ton
Vu = 146,319.88 N Vu = 97,546.59 N
Vn = 243,866.47 N Vn = 162,577.64 N
h = 600.00 mm h = 600.00 mm
b = 400.00 mm b = 400.00 mm
d = 531.50 mm d = 494.50 mm
fc' = 30.00 MPa fc' = 30.00 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa fy = 390.00 MPa
Vc = 194,076.36 N Vc = 180,565.87 N
5Vc = 970,381.80 N 5Vc = 902,829.35 N
0.5Vc = 97,038.18 N 0.5Vc = 90,282.93 N
Vn > Vc Vn > Vc
Dist. of bar. = 100 mm Dist. of bar. = 200 mm
Dia. of bar = 13 mm Dia. of bar = 13 mm
Stirrup needed Stirrup needed
Avmin = 34.19 mm2 Avmin = 68.38 mm2
Av = 24.02 mm2 Av = (18.65) mm2
Av(act) = 265.46 mm2 Ok !!! Av(act) = 265.46 mm2 Ok !!!
Vs(act) = 550,268.25 N Vs(act) = 255,980.86 N
Vn(act) = 744,344.61 N Ok !!! Vn(act) = 436,546.73 N Ok !!!
Vn(act) = 75.95 ton Vn(act) = 44.50 ton
Based on calculation strirrup used D13-100 at support and D13-200 at span.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 43 Of 79
4.6.5 B 300x400
Frames force and reinforcement calculation of Column 300x400 can be seen below.
Max 1.1132 7.0133 0.149 1.3877 0.066 4.90386
ENV ULS
Min -1.494 -7.6301 -0.121 -1.4622 -0.06 -11.893
Section Capacity
Data: Calculation:
b = 300 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 169.69 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 144.24 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 1,103,409.05 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 413,384.90 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 1,516,793.95 N
As(act) = 1,701.17 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 19 mm Xb = 182.33 mm
No. of bar = 6 X(max) = 136.75 mm
Clear distance between layer-1 = 50 mm Cc = 889,187.34 N
d = 297.50 mm T(max) = 1,025,434.42 N
As(max) = 2,629.32 mm2 OK
Compression Bar

dia. = 19 mm A = 6,502.50 N/mm
No. of bar = 4 B = -11,908.21 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -42,529,310.55 N-mm
d' = 62.50 mm Cc = 531,865.02 N
Cs = 136,247.08 N
Mu = 4.90 t-m Mn(act) = 171,758,991.55 N-mm
Mn = 6.13 t-m Mn(act) = 17.53 t-m OK

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 44 Of 79
Section Capacity
Data: Calculation:
b = 300 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 169.69 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 144.24 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 1,103,409.05 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 413,384.90 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 1,516,793.95 N
As(act) = 1,701.17 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 19 mm Xb = 182.33 mm
No. of bar = 6 X(max) = 136.75 mm
d = 297.50 mm T(max) = 1,025,434.42 N
As(max) = 2,629.32 mm2 OK
Compression Bar

dia. = 19 mm A = 6,502.50 N/mm
No. of bar = 4 B = -11,908.21 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -42,529,310.55 N-mm
d' = 62.50 mm Cc = 531,865.02 N
Cs = 136,247.08 N
Mu = 11.89 t-m Mn(act) = 171,758,991.55 N-mm
Mn = 14.87 t-m Mn(act) = 17.53 t-m OK
Based on calculation reinforment at support used 4 + 2D19 for tensile reinforcemet and 4D19
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 45 Of 79
Cek stirrup
SUPPORT SPAN
Vu = 7.01 ton Vu = 4.68 ton
Vu = 68,730.34 N Vu = 45,820.23 N
Vn = 114,550.57 N Vn = 76,367.04 N
h = 400.00 mm h = 400.00 mm
b = 300.00 mm b = 300.00 mm
d = 331.50 mm d = 294.50 mm
fc' = 30.00 MPa fc' = 30.00 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa fy = 390.00 MPa
Vc = 90,785.01 N Vc = 80,652.15 N
5Vc = 453,925.07 N 5Vc = 403,260.73 N
0.5Vc = 45,392.51 N 0.5Vc = 40,326.07 N
Vn > Vc Vn > Vc
Av = 18.38 mm2 Av = (7.46) mm2
Vs(act) = 343,205.88 N Vs(act) = 152,449.67 N

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 46 Of 79
4.6.6 B 200x300
Frames force and reinforcement calculation of Column 200x300 can be seen below.
Max 0.2545 2.3658 0.013 0.2199 0.009 1.45734
ENV ULS
Min -0.5237 -2.4346 -0.012 -0.1601 -0.009 -2.973

Section Capacity
Data: Calculation:
b = 200 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 157.47 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 133.85 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 682,642.40 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 219,861.22 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 902,503.62 N
Clear cover = 40 mm As y = 2,314.11 mm2 compres sion bar not yield
As(act) = 603.19 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 16 mm Xb = 123.80 mm
No. of bar = 3 X(max) = 92.85 mm
No. of bar in layer 2 = 0 fs' = -0.81 MPa
CG distance between layer = 40.00 mm Cs = -15,871.07 N
d = 202.00 mm T(max) = 386,629.42 N
As (max) = 991.36 mm2 OK
Compres sion Bar
As'(act) = 603.19 mm2 III) Mn(act) Calculation

dia. = 16 mm A = 4,335.00 N/mm
No. of bar = 3 B = 111,287.78 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -20,990,865.47 N-mm
CG distance between layer = 0.00 mm fs' = -0.81 MPa
d' = 58.00 mm Cc = 251,099.72 N
Cs = -15,871.07 N
Mu = 1.46 t-m Mn(act) = 42,255,232.45 N-mm
Mn = 1.82 t-m Mn(act) = 4.31 t-m OK

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 47 Of 79
Based on calculation reinforment at span used 3D16 for tensile reinforcemet and 3D16
Section Capacity
Data: Calculation:
b = 200 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 157.47 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 133.85 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 682,642.40 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 219,861.22 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 902,503.62 N
As(act) = 603.19 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 16 mm Xb = 123.80 mm
No. of bar = 3 X(max) = 92.85 mm
No. of bar in layer 2 = 0 fs' = -0.81 MPa
CG distance between layer = 40 mm Cs = -15,871.07 N
d = 202.00 mm T(max) = 386,629.42 N
As(max) = 991.36 mm2 OK
Compression Bar

dia. = 16 mm A = 4,335.00 N/mm
No. of bar = 3 B = 111,287.78 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -20,990,865.47 N-mm
CG distance between layer = 0 mm fs' = -0.81 MPa
d' = 58.00 mm Cc = 251,099.72 N
Cs = -15,871.07 N
Mu = 2.97 t-m Mn(act) = 42,255,232.45 N-mm
Mn = 3.72 t-m Mn(act) = 4.31 t-m OK

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 48 Of 79
Based on calculation reinforment at span used 3D16 for tensile reinforcemet and 3D16
Cek stirrup
SUPPORT SPAN
Vu = 2.37 ton Vu = 1.58 ton
Vu = 23,184.84 N Vu = 15,456.56 N
Vn = 38,641.40 N Vn = 25,760.93 N
h = 300.00 mm h = 300.00 mm
b = 200.00 mm b = 200.00 mm
d = 236.00 mm d = 197.50 mm
fc' = 30.00 MPa fc' = 30.00 MPa
fy = 240.00 MPa fy = 240.00 MPa
Vc = 43,087.51 N Vc = 36,058.40 N
5Vc = 215,437.54 N 5Vc = 180,292.01 N
0.5Vc = 21,543.75 N 0.5Vc = 18,029.20 N
Vn > Vc Vn > Vc
Av = (7.85) mm2 Av = (43.45) mm2
Vs(act) = 88,969.90 N Vs(act) = 37,227.87 N
4.6.7 Slab 120 mm
Area force and reinforcement calculation of slab 120 mm can be seen below.
Table 4-14 Area Force Slab 120 mm
Area Shells at Ultimate Condition
Remark M11 M22 M12
Text Tonf-m/m Tonf-m/m Tonf-m/m
Min 0.78492 0.83379 0.25364
Max -0.9516 -0.949878 -0.27277
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 49 Of 79
Reinforcement Calculation:
M11 Direction M22 Direction

Reinforcement Required Reinforcement Required As Minimum
Momen = 0.95 ton.m Momen = 0.78 ton.m √fc'/4fy x bw x d = 217.971
As = Mn/(fy(d-a2/2)) As = Mn/(fy(d-a2/2)) 1.4/fy x bw x d = 222.857
Mn = 1.06 ton.m Mn = 0.98 ton.m n-tul = 5
b = 100 cm b = 100 cm So; = M8-200
h = 12 cm h = 12 cm
d = 8 cm d = 8 cm
f'c = 300.00 kg/cm2 f'c = 300.00 kg/cm2
fy = 4900 kg/cm2 fy = 4900 kg/cm2
D = 8 mm D = 8 mm
As = 0.50 cm2 As = 0.50 cm2
a1 = 3.07 a1 = 2.85
a2 = 0.59 a2 = 0.55
As = 2.88 cm2 As = 2.66 cm2
n = 6 n = 6
So; = M8-150 So; = M8-150
Based on momen load, reinforcement for M11 is M8-200, based on As minimum is M8-200. So,
the design is use M8-150 for M11 and M22.
M22 Direction
b = 100 cm b = 100 cm So; = M8-200
h = 12 cm h = 12 cm
d = 8 cm d = 8 cm
f'c = 300.00 kg/cm2 f'c = 300.00 kg/cm2
fy = 4900 kg/cm2 fy = 4900 kg/cm2
D = 8 mm D = 8 mm
As = 0.50 cm2 As = 0.50 cm2
a1 = 3.07 a1 = 3.03
a2 = 0.59 a2 = 0.58
As = 2.87 cm2 As = 2.83 cm2
n = 6 n = 6
So; = M8-200 So; = M8-150
Based on momen load, reinforcement for M22 is M8-150, based on As minimum is M8-2050.
So, the design is use M8-150 for M11 and M22.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 50 Of 79
4.6.8 Deflection Structure
The maximum value of joint displacement can be seen in the table below,
Table 4-15 Summary Defleksi Struktur

TABLE: Joint Displacements
OutputCase CaseType U1 U2 U3
Text Text m m m
SERVIS Ma x 0.0050 0.0039 0.0011
SERVIS Min -0.0040 -0.0050 -0.0147
Deflection
Displacement all = L/360 = 12000/360 = 33.33 mm
U3 = 0.0147 m = 14.7 mm Jadi, defleksi OK
Displacement all = H/300 = 5000/300 = 16.67 mm
Max U1 dan U2 m = 0.0050 m = 5 mm, Jadi simpangan OK
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 51 Of 79
5.0 SUBSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS

5.1 General
Structured modeling using SAP2000 Program Version 14 and Manual
5.2 Structure Modeling
For the structure of the lower structure consists of:
a. Slab Floor 150 mm
b. Tie beam 400x600
c. Tie beam
5.3 Substructure Material

The material used for the building below is K300 concrete
Figure 5-21 Properti of Concrete Material

Substructure consists of tie beam and slab floor elevation +0.00. the properties for the structure
below can be seen as follows.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 52 Of 79
Figure 5-22 Slab Properties 150 mm
Figure 5-23 TB1 – 400x600

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 53 Of 79
Figure 5-24 TB2 – 300x400
5.5 Application Load

Substructure for the main control room consisting of 150mm and TB floor slabs can be seen as
follows.
Figure 5-25 Model TB dan Floor Slab
5.5.1 Super Dead Load
The dead load for this substructure consists of.

1. Slab 120 mm
Assumption finishing 5 cm = 0.05 m
So SDL finishing = 0.05 m x 2.4 ton / m3 = 0.12 ton / m2
2. TB 400x600 and TB 300x400
Sdl TB = 0.25 ton / m2 x5.6 m = 1.40 ton / m
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 54 Of 79
Here is the application of additional dead loads for both structures.
Figure 5-26 Aplication SDL at Slab 150 mm
Figure 5-27 Aplication SDL at tie beam
5.5.2 Live Load
The live load on the slab is 4.75 KN / m2 = 0.48 ton / m2

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 55 Of 79
Figure 5-28 Aplication Live Load at Slab 150 mm
5.6 Analysis Structure

In this calculation the reinforcement of:
1. Calculation of 150 mm reinforcement
2. Calculation of tie beam 400x600 reinforcement
3. Calculation of tie beam reinforcement 300x400
5.6.1 Slab 150 mm
Below is an frame force for a floor slab of 150 mm

Table 5-16 Gaya Dalam Slab Lantai 150 mm
Area Shells at Ultimate Condition

Remark M11 M22 M12
Text Tonf-m/m Tonf-m/m Tonf-m/m
Min 0.94527 0.9978 0.29389
Max -1.6847 -1.78619 -0.32516
Below is a calculation of the reinforcement for a 150 mm
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 56 Of 79
M11 Direction
As = Mn/(fy(d-a2/2)) As = Mn/(fy(d-a2/2)) 1.4/fy x bw x d = 300
b = 100 cm b = 100 cm So; = M10-250
h = 15 cm h = 15 cm
d = 11 cm d = 10 cm
f'c = 300.00 kg/cm2 f'c = 300.00 kg/cm2
fy = 4900 kg/cm2 fy = 4900 kg/cm2
D = 10 mm D = 13 mm
As = 0.79 cm2 As = 1.33 cm2
a1 = 4.09 a1 = 2.67
a2 = 0.79 a2 = 0.51
As = 3.82 cm2 As = 2.46 cm2
n = 6 n = 2
So, the design is use M10-150
M22 Direction
b = 100 cm b = 100 cm So; = M10-250
h = 15 cm h = 15 cm
d = 11 cm d = 11 cm
f'c = 300.00 kg/cm2 f'c = 300.00 kg/cm2
fy = 4900 kg/cm2 fy = 4900 kg/cm2
D = 10 mm D = 10 mm
As = 0.79 cm2 As = 0.79 cm2
a1 = 4.09 a1 = 2.69
a2 = 0.79 a2 = 0.52
As = 3.82 cm2 As = 2.49 cm2
n = 6 n = 4
So, the design is use M1-150 (2 layer)
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 57 Of 79
5.6.2 TB.400x600 mm
Here is a tie beam 400x600 reinforcement

Case Type Step Type P V2 V3 T M2 M3
ENVE_ULS Max 1.732 24.319 0.152 4.663 0.135 23.246
ENVE_ULS Min -2.092 -26.395 -0.155 -4.011 -0.131 -30.108
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 58 Of 79
Section Capacity
Data: Calculation:
b = 400 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 169.69 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 144.24 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 1,471,212.07 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 413,384.90 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 1,884,596.97 N
As(act) = 2,268.23 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 19 mm Xb = 304.90 mm
No. of bar = 8 X(max) = 228.68 mm
d = 497.50 mm T(max) = 2,137,564.16 N
As(max) = 5,480.93 mm2 OK
Compression Bar
dia. = 19 mm A = 8,670.00 N/mm
No. of bar = 4 B = -233,060.62 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -42,529,310.55 N-mm
d' = 62.50 mm Cc = 734,841.26 N
Cs = 154,950.36 N
Mu = 23.25 t-m Mn(act) = 406,516,753.51 N-mm
Mn = 29.06 t-m Mn(act) = 41.48 t-m OK
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 59 Of 79
Section Capacity
Data: Calculation:
b = 400 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 169.69 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 144.24 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 1,471,212.07 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 413,384.90 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 1,884,596.97 N
As(act) = 2,268.23 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 19 mm Xb = 304.90 mm
No. of bar = 8 X(max) = 228.68 mm
d = 497.50 mm T(max) = 2,137,564.16 N
As(max) = 5,480.93 mm2 OK
Compression Bar
dia. = 19 mm A = 8,670.00 N/mm
No. of bar = 4 B = -233,060.62 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -42,529,310.55 N-mm
d' = 62.50 mm Cc = 734,841.26 N
Cs = 154,950.36 N
Mu = 30.11 t-m Mn(act) = 406,516,753.51 N-mm
Mn = 37.63 t-m Mn(act) = 41.48 t-m OK
Based on calculation reinforment at support used 4D19 for tensile reinforcemet and 5+5 D19
Cek stirrup
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 60 Of 79
SUPPORT SPAN
Vu = 24.32 ton Vu = 16.21 ton
Vu = 238,324.24 N Vu = 158,882.83 N
Vn = 397,207.07 N Vn = 264,804.71 N
h = 600.00 mm h = 600.00 mm
b = 400.00 mm b = 400.00 mm
d = 531.50 mm d = 494.50 mm
fc' = 30.00 MPa fc' = 30.00 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa fy = 390.00 MPa
Vc = 194,076.36 N Vc = 180,565.87 N
5Vc = 970,381.80 N 5Vc = 902,829.35 N
0.5Vc = 97,038.18 N 0.5Vc = 90,282.93 N
Vn > Vc Vn > Vc
Av = 195.99 mm2 Av = 87.36 mm2
Vs(act) = 275,134.13 N Vs(act) = 255,980.86 N
5.6.3 TB.300x400 mm
Frames force and reinforcement calculation of tie beam 300x400 can be seen below.
Case Type Step Type P V2 V3 T M2 M3
ENVE_ULS Max 0.715 10.888 0.066 0.762 0.043 8.126
ENVE_ULS Min -0.636 -11.985 -0.048 -0.488 -0.031 -10.913
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 61 Of 79
Section Capacity
Data: Calculation:
b = 300 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 169.69 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 144.24 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 1,103,409.05 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 310,038.67 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 1,413,447.73 N
As(act) = 1,701.17 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 19 mm Xb = 182.33 mm
No. of bar = 6 X(max) = 136.75 mm
d = 297.50 mm T(max) = 1,005,400.11 N
As(max) = 2,577.95 mm2 OK
Compression Bar
dia. = 19 mm A = 6,502.50 N/mm
No. of bar = 3 B = -174,795.47 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -31,896,982.91 N-mm
d' = 62.50 mm Cc = 551,130.95 N
Cs = 116,212.77 N
Mu = 8.13 t-m Mn(act) = 171,418,822.00 N-mm
Mn = 10.16 t-m Mn(act) = 17.49 t-m OK
Based on calculation reinforment at span used 3+3 D19 for tensile reinforcemet and 3D19
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 62 Of 79
Section Capacity
Data: Calculation:
b = 300 mm es' = 0.0019
fc' = 30.00 MPa Xy = 169.69 mm
e'cu = 0.0030 ay = 144.24 mm
b1 = 0.8500 fs' = 390.0000 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa Ccy = 1,103,409.05 N
Es = 205,800 MPa Csy = 310,038.67 N
ey = 0.0019 Ty = 1,413,447.73 N
As(act) = 1,701.17 mm2 es = 0.0019
dia. = 19 mm Xb = 182.33 mm
No. of bar = 6 X(max) = 136.75 mm
d = 297.50 mm T(max) = 1,005,400.11 N
As(max) = 2,577.95 mm2 OK
Compression Bar
dia. = 19 mm A = 6,502.50 N/mm
No. of bar = 3 B = -174,795.47 N
No. of layer = 1 C = -31,896,982.91 N-mm
d' = 62.50 mm Cc = 551,130.95 N
Cs = 116,212.77 N
Mu = 10.91 t-m Mn(act) = 171,418,822.00 N-mm
Mn = 13.64 t-m Mn(act) = 17.49 t-m OK
Based on calculation reinforment at support used 3D19 for tensile reinforcemet and 3+3D19
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 63 Of 79
Cek stirrup
SUPPORT SPAN
Vu = 10.89 ton Vu = 7.26 ton
Vu = 106,706.32 N Vu = 71,137.55 N
Vn = 177,843.87 N Vn = 118,562.58 N
h = 400.00 mm h = 400.00 mm
b = 300.00 mm b = 300.00 mm
d = 331.50 mm d = 294.50 mm
fc' = 30.00 MPa fc' = 30.00 MPa
fy = 390.00 MPa fy = 390.00 MPa
Vc = 90,785.01 N Vc = 80,652.15 N
5Vc = 453,925.07 N 5Vc = 403,260.73 N
0.5Vc = 45,392.51 N 0.5Vc = 40,326.07 N
Vn > Vc Vn > Vc
Av = 134.68 mm2 Av = 66.01 mm2
Vs(act) = 171,602.94 N Vs(act) = 152,449.67 N

Perencanaan Sarana & Fasilitas Gedung New
HSSE Office Pertamina Refinery Unit V
Balikpapan
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 64 Of 79
6.0 GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS

6.1 General
In designing the pile foundation for the building Control Room Lawe Lawe, soil data used as a
reference in analyzing the foundation stability is the boring log B-28, the boring log data is
obtained from the owner.
Lay out the boring log point can be seen in the picture below
Titik Soil B-
28
Figure 6-29 Layout Titik Boring Log

6.2 Data Boring Log
Berdasarkan hasil survey dan investigasi tanah yang dilakukan dilokasi proyek, hasil
penyelidikan lapisan tanah pada titik B-28, dapat dilihat pada gambar dibawah ini.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 65 Of 79
Source : Owner
Figure 6-30 Boring Log B-28 (Sheet 1)

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 66 Of 79
Source : Owner
Figure 6-31 Boring Log B-28 (Sheet 2)

PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 67 Of 79
6.3 Analysis Of Deep Foundation Based On Spt Correlations

This chapter presents the analyses of deep foundation system : bearing capacity and predicted
settlement. Analyses were performed based on the geotechnical investigation results.
6.3.1 Axial Pile Capacity A Driven Spun Pile
The ultimate axial capacity of a driven Spun pile was obtained by a simple equation as the sum of
the end bearing and the skin friction resistance :
Qu = Qp + Qs
Where,
Qu = the ultimate pile capacity
Qp = the ultimate end bearing capacity
Qs = the ultimate skin friction resistance
Qs
Qp
Figure 6-32 Beraing Capacity of Axial
6.3.2 Skin Friction Resistance
The ultimate skin friction resistance of a driven pile in c-φ soil was calculated in accordance with
the following formula :
Qs = Qsc + Qs
Where,
Qs = the ultimate skin friction resistance
Qsc = contribution of soil cohesion, c
Qsφ = contribution of internal friction angle, φ
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 68 Of 79
 Contribution of Soil Cohesion

The contribution of soil cohesion for the ultimate skin friction resistance was obtained by the
following formula:
Qsc =∑ α⋅c u−i⋅l i⋅p
Where,
Qsc = contribution of soil cohesion, c for ultimate skin friction resistance
α = adhesion factor (Figure 6.2)
Cu-I = undrained soil cohesion at layer –i
Ii = length of pile segment along layer –i
p = perimeter of pile
Figure 6-33 Faktor Adhesi API Metode 2 (1986)
 Contribution of internal friction angle of soil, φ

The contribution interval friction angle of soil, φ for the ultimate skin friction resistance could be
obtained by the following formula,
n
QS   f i li p
i 1
Where,
Qsφ = contribution of internal friction angle of soil, φ for ultimate skin friction resistance
fi = Ksi.α’V-1.tan (δ)
Ks = coefficient of horizontal soil stress at layer-i
α’v-1 = effective vertical stress at middle of layer-i
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 69 Of 79
φ = angle of wall friction at layer –i

Ii = length of pile segment along layer-i
p = perimeter of pile
A value of K 0.8 is recommended for open-ended pipe piles that are driven unplugged, for
loadings in both tension and compression. A value of k of 1.0 is recommended for full
displacement piles. In the absence of data on δ, Table 4.1 was selected as guidelines only for
siliceous sand.
Table 6-17 Value of the Friction Angle For Certain Soil
Meyerhof has also indicated that the average unit friction resistance for driven high-displacement
piles in sand can be obtained from the average N-SPT value as,
Qu = 0.2 N. As
N = Mean N value for the total embedded length of the pile
6.3.3 End Bearing Capacity
In general, the ultimate end bearing capacity of driven pile that penetrated into c-φ soils could be
expressed as :
Qp = Ap (c Nc + q Nq)
Where,
Qp = ultimate end bearing capacity
Ap = area of pile tip
q’ = effective vertical stress at the level of pile tip
Nc*, Nq* = the bearing capacity factors
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 70 Of 79
 End bearing in cohesive soil

The API recommendation in equal form is as follows, along with a suggestion for modifying
the value of c :
Qp = q Ap
q=9c
Where,
Qp = axial load capacity in end bearing
q = unit bearing resistance
c = undrained shear strength at tip of pile, usually taken as the average over a distance
of 2 diameters below the tip of the pile, and
Ap = cross-sections area of tip of pile
 End bearing in cohesive soil
For end bearing in cohesionless soils, API recommends the following.
q = α' Nq
Where,
α’ = effective overburden pressure at pile tip, and
Nq = bearing capacity factor
For siliceous soil, Table 6.2 was recommended as guidelines.
Table 6-18 Value of Capacity for Certain Soil

Limiting q
Soil Nq
Kips/ft2 MPa
Very loose to medium, sand to silt 8 40 1.9
Loose to dense, sand to silt 12 60 2.9
Medium to dense, sand to sand silt 20 100 4.8
Dense to very dense, sand to sand-silt 40 200 9.6
Dense to very dense, gravel to sand 50 250 12.0
Berezantsev recommended Nq values as show in Figure 6.5, which take into account the
ratio of depth to width pile most nearly conform to practical criteria of pile failure.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 71 Of 79
Figure 6-34 Berezantsev’s Bearing Capacity Factor, Nq
6.3.4 Plugged vs. Unplugged and Open vs. Closed end Steel Pipe Piles
The ultimate end bearing capacity for an open and closed end unplugged and plugged steel pipe
piles should be computed differently. For an unplug condition, the end bearing is supported by
the skin friction resistance of soil inside pile (Qsu). The skin resistance inside pipe pile is a
reduction (70%) of the skin resistance outside the pipe (Qs). As the depth of penetration
increases the skin friction inside pile will increase until reaching the end bearing as if the pile is
closed (plug condition). For an open end steel pipe pile, the end bearing is the minimum value of
unplugged and plugged end bearing. Figure 4.3 illustrates calculation of end bearing for both plug
and unplug condition. Detail calculation procedures are subsequently discussed.
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 72 Of 79
Figure 6-35 Plug and Unplug End Illustration
6.3.5 Uplift Capacity
The design of piles for uplift loading conditions has become increasingly important for structures
subject to seismic loading. In some cases, the pile uplift capacity determines the minimum
requirements of pile penetration and their numbers.
Nicola and Randolph (1993) note that in fine-grained cohesive soils, where loading is assumed to
occur under undrained conditions, the uplift shaft resistance is generally considered equal to its
compression. Whereas in non-cohesive or free draining soils, Nicola and Randolph (1993) state
that it has been customary to assume that the shaft resistance in uplift is approximately 70% of
the shaft resistance in compression. Since subsurface soil at the proposed project location
consists of cohesive and non-cohesive soil, the shaft resistance in uplift is considered equal to
70% of the shaft resistance in compression.
6.3.6 Allowable Bearing Capacity of Pile (Pall)
Regardless which procedure is adopted for calculations of end bearing resistance, it is important
to underline that full capacity cannot be reached until the pile tip has gone through an
approximate settlement of 5-10% of the width of the pile. This has become critical for the cases
of sands since settlement will control the ultimate capacity. The shaft capacity of a pile is
mobilized at much smaller displacements of the pile (typically 0.5 to 2 % of the pile diameter)
than the end bearing capacity. This difference between the load deformation characteristics of
the pile shaft and that of the pile base is important in determining the settlement response of a
pile and the sharing of load between shaft and base, under working condition.
The Allowable Bearing Capacity the ultimate divided by the safety factor, or it can also be formula
in the following below:
Qult
Qall=
SF
In general, the frequently used safety factor range from 2 - 4 for operational conditions or for
loads that work during operation.
According to Tomlinson (1977), the determination of the permitted capacity of the pile is as show
in the following equation:
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 73 Of 79
Qult
Qall=
2. 5
From the above equation, the security number used for the pole foundation design is 2.5.
The Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual and AASHTO 1992 recommend the use of a
safety factor of 2.5 for pile capacity.
The range of security numbers depends on the reliability of the static analysis method used with
the following considerations:
- The degree of confidence in the soil parameters used.
- Uniformity of soil layers.
- Effect and consistency of the pole installation method used.
- The level of supervision during construction.
Recomendation pile test was performed using either the Static Loading Test - Pile Driving
Analaysis (PDA) test.
6.3.7 Criteria of Driving Pile
The Driving criteria should refer to as described below

 Pile the pole to meet the targeted level of the design on the location of the nearest drilling
point.
 If at the time of driving occurs the power of departure by the pile above the specified
target, continue the erection to the count of 100 punch / 250mm punching or the final set
of 25mm / 10 punch for the concrete pile. As for the steel pile required penetration 200
punch / 250mm or final set 12.5mm / 10 punch. If penetration is not maintained at 25mm /
10 punch for concrete pylon or 12.5mm / 10 punch for steel pile, it can be concluded that
the hard soil layers encountered have thin layers and piles tend to penetrate the layer. Of
course, the pile should be designed according to the specified target level. However, if the
final set value does not reach the desired target it is permissible to dismiss the piercing
activity based on the length of the pile mentioned in the design drawing.
6.3.8 Lateral Capacity
Design of lateral capacity of piles and prediction of lateral load vs. Lateral displacement were
performed by adopting the p-y method proposed by Matlock (1970) and Reese (1977). A
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 74 Of 79
professional software, called “LPILE” (Reese, et al., 2003) was utilized for computing the lateral
capacity of piles and load-displacement behaviors. Calculated bending moments along with the
shear stresses on piles were also obtained. The software utilizes the finite different method.
Since the lateral deflection of piles due to lateral load on foundation may exceed the range of
elastic compression of soil, the method considered a condition where the soil yields plastically up
to end beyond the stage of shear failure. By using the p-y method from Matlock (1970) soil
pressure can be analyzed. The method can also consider the effects of soil plastic deformation
on the pile reaction. The following paragraph explains the p-y method, which is taken from “Pile
Design and Construction Practice” by Tomlinson (2003).
The form of a p-y curve is shown in Figure 6.6. The individual curve representing each horizontal
soil resistance may be plotted on a pair of axes to give a family of curves for the selected depths
below the ground surface.
In this report does not show the results of calculation of the lateral bearing capacity.
Figure 6-36 P-Y Curve for Laterally Loaded Pile (After Matlock, 1970)
Method of drawing sets of p-y curves have been established for soils that have a linearly
increasing modulus, i.e., soft firm normally consolidated clays and granular soils. Empirical
factors were obtained by Matlock from experimental lateral pile loading test. In this method, the
first step is to calculate the ultimate lateral resistance of clay due to lateral loading. Matlock
method is similar to the conventional method. However, the bearing capacity factor for lateral
load, Nc is obtained using a somewhat different basis.
Below a critical depth, rx, the coefficient, Nc, is taken conventionally as nine (9). Above this
depth, it is given by the following equation:
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 75 Of 79
γx Jx
Nc=3+ +
Cu B
Where,
γ = density of the overburden soil,
x = depth below level
cu = undrained cohesion value of clay
J = empirical factor
B = width of pile
The experimental work of Matlock yielded values of J from 0.5 for a soft-clay to 0.25 for a stiffer
clay. The critical depth I given by the equation:
6B
xr=
γB
+J
cu
The ultimate resistance above and below the critical depth is expressed in the p-y curves as a
force pu per unit length pile, which depends on the undrained shear strength of soil (cu).
Pu=Nc Cu B
The shape of the p-y curve is derived from that of the stress-strain curve obtained by testing a
soil specimen in undrained triaxial compression or from load-settlement curve in plate loading
test. The shape of the curve is defined by the following equation:
p/ pu=0.5 ∛ ( y / y c )
Where yc is the deflection corresponding to strain at strain at a stress equal to the maximum
stress resulting from the laboratory stress-strain curve. Matlock (1970) recommends an average
value of 0.01 for normally consolidated clays for use in the equation:
yc=2.5 c B
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 76 Of 79
Figure 6-37 Determining Shape of P-Y Curve in Soft to Firm Clay (After Matlock, 1970)
Similar procedure can also be applied for sand. Derivation of lateral soil resistance of sand is
given by Reese et.al (1977) as shown in the figure below, where x is the depth below the soil
surface selected for the particular p-y curve.
The procedure described below is using the p-y curve in conjunction with the deflection obtained
from the elastic analysis of Reese and Matlock in common both of piles in soft to firm clays and
granular soils.
The lateral capacities of piles depend on the allowable lateral displacement. In design, the
analysis of lateral capacity of the piles is performed using LPILE (Reese et al., 2003). The stress-
strain response of the pile is modeled as a simple elastic material. The results of analyses for
single pile are presented as lateral load versus pile head deflection, maximum bending moment.
Figure 6-38 Obtaining Critical Depth for Laterally Loaded Pile in Cohesionless Soil
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 77 Of 79
Figure 6-39 Determining Shape of P-Y Curve in Sand (After Reese, 1970)
The lateral capacities of piles depend on allowable lateral displacement.
6.4 Analysis of Foundation Control Room Lawe lawe
Computer software foundation analysis below representative from working load maximum based
on joint reaction SAP2000 to each type of pile foundation.
Joint Reaction
Table 6-19 Join Reaksi Control Room Lawe Lawe CSP 500 T90 mm
TABLE : Joint Reaction (Service)
Case Type F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3
Text Ton.f Ton.f Ton.f Ton.f-m Ton.f-m Ton.f-m
MAX 5.680 3.368 64.381 13.407 19.023 0.053
MIN -5.401 -3.038 1.621 -12.556 -15.574 -0.084
From the results of the joint analysis of the above reactions, next will be used loading in the pile
capacity analysis, the following is the result of analysis to the capacity of Pile CSP 500 T90 mm,
The details of the stake and the ground point are as follows,
 Pile Type = CSP 500 T90 mm
 Embedded of Pile = 12.00 m
 Referenc of boring log = B-28
Analysis of Bearing Capacity

The following is the value of bearing capacity of compression and tension based on boring log B-
28 with, using piles CSP 500 T90 mm,
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 78 Of 79
DRIVEN CONCRETE SPUN PILE FOUNDATION CARRYING CAPACITY

BASED ON N (SPT) VALUE
PROJECT : PERTAMINA
LOCATION : BALIKPAPAN
BORING NO. : BH-28
N-SPT Value Allowable Compressive Capacity Allowable Pullout Capacity

(ton) (ton)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 25 50 75 100 125 150

0 0
0
-1 4
-2 4
-3 5
-4 5
-5 -5
-5 9
-6 12
-7 15
Depth (m )
Depth (m )
-8 17
Depth (m )
-9 23
-10 -10
-10 28
-11 44
-12 60
-13 60
-14 60
-15 -15
-15 60
-16 60
-17 60
-18 60
-19 60
-20 -20
-20 60
Pile Diam eter (m) Pile Diam e ter (m)
0.450 0.500 0.600 0.800 0.450 0.500 0.600 0.800
Figure 6-40 Allowable Bearing Capacity of Control Room Lawe Lawe - CSP 500 T90 mm – B-28
 Capacity of Compression
Pc,max = 64.381 ton (Compression)
Pall,c = 182.10 ton , based on B-28, (SFc = 2.5, referenc OCDI)
P = 64.381 ton (Compression) < 182.10 ton…. OK!
Check Capacity of Lateral

Analysis of the lateral capacity on pile CSP 500 T90 mm as follows,
Maximum lateral load on pile, H = 5.401 Ton,
PROJECT NO : REV 1
LAPORAN PERENCANAAN
171002 DATE 28-02-2017
DOCUMENT NO : PAGE
26070-203-3PS-C000-I1001 ALL-PILE Version 6 CivilTech Software www.civiltech.com
79 Of 79
Licensed to
LATERAL LOAD vs DEFLECTION & MAX. MOMENT
60 60
54 54
48 48
42 42
36 36
Lateral Load, P -kN

Lateral Load, P -kN
30 30
24 24
18 18
12 12
6 6
0 0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Top Deflection, yt -cm Max. Moment in Single Pile, Mmax -kN-m
Referenc : Output ALLPile Aplication
Figure 6-41 Deflection Vs Depth And Moment Maximum Control Room Lawe Lawe – CSP 500 mm –
CivilTech
Software B-28 Figure 2
Check:
- Lateral load Maximum = 5.401 ton
- Deflection on Pile = 0.415 cm < 2.54 cm…..………OK!
Settlement of Pile
ALL-PILE Version 6 CivilTech Software www.civiltech.com Licensed to
Maximum compression load based on structural analysis with Pc,max = 64.381 ton as follows.
Vertical Load vs. Settlement
5000
4500
4000
Compression Load, Qdw -kN
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0
Settlement, X -cm
Total Side Tip
Referenc : Output ALLPile Aplication
Figure 6-42 Vertical load vs pile settlement Control Room Lawe Lawe – CSP 500 mm – B-28
CivilTech
Software Figure 1
Maximum settlement based on compression load of pile is 0.257 cm. Allowable vertical
displacement piles is 1” or 2.4 cm, the settlement of pile can be said in good condition.

Report Control Room Lawe 220218-RE0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report Control Room Lawe 220218-RE0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JOB NO DOC. NO. REV.

LAPORAN PENYUSUNAN BASIC ENGINEERING DESIGN UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN

LAPORAN DESAIN CONTROL ROOM LAWE LAWE

0 05-01-2017 ALL FOR REVIEW / FOR APPROVAL DA

REV. NO DATE INFORMATION

Table 2-1 Concrete Grade............................................................................................................................... 12

2.0 DESIGN CRITERIA

4. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)

5. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

6. ASTM International (ASTM)

7. American Nationa Standards Institute (ANSI)

8. Indonesian National Standard and Regulation

2.3 Design Life

2.4 Material Properties

2.4.1 Concrete Material

Concrete grade is as follow:

Table 2-1 Concrete Grade

Exposure Condition Maximum Allowable Crack Width

Table 2-4 Concrete Cover

Table 2-5 Tebal Minimum Selimut Beton Pracetak

2.4.2 Steel Structure

Table 2-6 Deflection Limitation on Steel Structure for Building

2.4.3 Reinforcement Bars

Table 2-7 Reinforcement Bars

2.4.4 Steel Material

2.4.5 Concrete Spun Pile

3.0 DESIGN LOAD

3.1 Dead Load

3.2 Live Load

Refer to 26070-203-3DR-S04D-J0001 Design CriteriaFor Structure and Foundations

3.3 Equipment Load

3.4 Rain Load

3.5 Wind Load

3.6 Seismic Load

Seismic analysis in accordance to standard SNI 03-1726-2012, “Standar Perencanaan

Table 3-9 Site-Specific Earthquake Load Parameter

3.7 Blast Load

3.8 Combination of Loads

4.0 UPPERSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS

4.3 Upperstructure Material

Figure 4-4 Material Identification

4.4 Material Properties

Figure 4-5 K1 – 400x400

Figure 4-6 B1 – 400x600

Figure 4-7 B2 – 300x400

Figure 4-8 B3 – 200x300

Figure 4-9 Pelat Lantai 120 mm

Figure 4-10 Slab 150 mm

4.5 Aplication Load

Figure 4-11 Model 3D – 1

Figure 4-12 Model 3D - 2

Figure 4-13 Plan Sloof

4.5.1 Super Dead Load

Figure 4-14 SDL Finishing Load

4.5.2 Live Load

Figure 4-15 Roof Live Load

4.5.3 Wind Load

Wind wall Wind wall

X direction - out Roof

Figure 4-16 Wind Load –X

Figure 4-17 Wind Load - Y

4.5.4 Rain Load

The assumption for rain load is 50 kg / m2