Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019 to 2022
Draft
V1.1
26 September 2019
Inxure Strategy
V0.1 June 2019 Draft Strategic Business Plan
Group
CHRC –
Review by General Manager Customer
V0.4 July 2019 Michelle
and Commercial Services
Webster
September CHRC –
V1.1 Update to column layout of risk table Andrew Gissel
2019
Endorsement Table
Coordinator Operations –
Joe Newman
Shepton Quarry
• The Shepton Quarry, which provides a mix of products external to Council and to Council
itself;
• The Mungabunda Quarry which provides products directly to Council; and
• The various borrow pits that are quarried to also provide services directly to Council.
This Business Plan has a 3-year duration and has been developed to enable the Business Unit
to:
• Deliver upon the relevant elements of Council’s Corporate and Operational Plans;
• Gain agreement on the long-term aspirations and desired outcomes for the business;
• Ensure a line of sight from the overall objectives to the day to day operations; and
• Provide a basis for decision making to continuously improve the business unit’s operations
and as such, inform long term capital and operational expenditure plans.
• The vision and objectives reflect the fact that the Quarry provides public value, beyond that
of a private sector run business activity. However, the Quarry must run with the discipline
of a private sector organisation;
• The importance to the Central Highlands Region of Council owning their own quarry is two-
fold.
o Firstly, it ensures there is a constant provider of high quality and compliant quarry
products to the region. This benefit is demonstrated by the fact that a number of
customers who have corporate goals of ensuring ethical and compliant purchasing
practices, that are customers of the quarry;
o The second benefit is that it is able to ensure the market for quarrying products remains
competitive and stable in all circumstances. Other regions have seen excessive pricing
during periods of high demand, such as when needing to respond to flood events or a
spike in the local economy;
• To ensure its competitiveness, the quarry must compete in the open market. However, it
must do so profitably. Otherwise Council’s ratepayers are subsidizing the provision of
quarrying products to the broader market. As such there is a performance target set for
the operation of the Shepton Quarry, that over 60% of its sales must be external to Council;
It should be noted that this plan is based on a robust foundation, with the quarry business activity
recording robust financial outcome for the 18/19 financial year. If movements in inventory are
netted off the results, then the business activity recorded net earnings of $300,000. Furthermore,
Shepton recorded a positive turnaround of $680,000 compared with budget (net of movements in
inventory). This was based on a doubling of sales compared with budget. This has been achieved
in a flat market, which has not been influenced by an increase in mining activity or other factors
such as flood repair works.
This business plan assumes the Shepton Quarry remains part of the overall Quarrying business
activity. It is noted that Council is currently working through an Expression of Interest process for
the possible sale of the Quarry. This EoI process will have the following implications for the quarry
business activity and Council, that need to be noted as part of this plan:
• In the 18/19 financial year, Shepton made up 61% of total Sales for the Quarry business
unit. Furthermore, the remaining sales from Mungabunda and Council’s borrow pits, are
exclusively to Council. If Shepton was sold, the Quarry Business would no longer
constitute a business activity as defined by Council’s Water Reform and Competition
Policy. The unit would become an internal service provider - principally to the Infrastructure
and Utilities division of Council;
• It is noted that during the Expression of Interest process, Council has put a freeze on any
capital expenditure and appointment of permanent staff within the Quarry business. While
this is most likely an appropriate course of action, it must be noted that it is both inefficient
and is holding the Quarry business back from achieving its longer-term goals. The
business unit is having to appoint contractors at a high cost and a lack of capital investment
means that the asset service potential is being run down and opportunities for growth are
being delayed or missed. It would be important that council expedite the sale process to
provide certainty for the business unit, one way or another;
• If Council were to sell the Shepton quarry business, it would lose a revenue stream that
currently covers a range of costs that that must continue to be covered after a sale process
(these costs are spelt out in further detail in section 8.2 of this plan). There is an estimated
$4million worth of costs that are covered by the current revenue stream from Shepton.
Figure 2 provides the performance measures that will be used to assess the Quarry’s
performance over the life of this plan. These performance measures map back to the plan’s
objectives and 3-year outcomes. These performance measures will enable the Quarry to maintain
and report on a “balanced scorecard” of financial and non-financial performance measures.
This result should position the Quarry well to realise its objectives of being a profitable business
unit and applying competitive pressure on quarry product prices across the region. Furthermore,
it provides a sound platform for considering a number of the growth opportunities outlined in 7.3
of this plan.
• Product
• The product growth measure is aimed at ensuring the business unit
growth
Provide continues to innovate and adapt to meet its customer’s needs
competitively • External • 1 / year
• Maintaining external sales from Shepton above 60%, ensures the
priced, high- Sales / Total
• >60% Quarry’s rates are market competitive and thus sets the benchmark for
quality quarry Sales
what it charges Council for its products
products across • 100%
• Achieve
the Central compliance • Product quality is an important differentiator for the Quarry and is thus an
MRD’s
Highlands Region important performance measure. The key benchmark is the Main Road’s
quality
Specifications
specifications
To safely and
profitably provide
• The Asset Sustainability Ratio reflects the service and financial
competitively • Asset
priced, high- sustainability of the business unit. Specially this measures the actual
Sustainability
quality quarry renewal spend, plus reserves set aside for depreciation, divided by the
Ratio
products for the Provide fit for • 90% depreciation allowance
benefit of the purpose, safe and • Material audit
• Zero • Being compliant with its many obligations is critical for the business
Central Highland’s compliant quarry non-
activity and this target is focused on ensuring there are no material audit
region facilities compliance • Zero non-compliances
• Lost Time
• Safety is an important outcome for Council and the target always needs to
Injuries
be one of zero harm
• Current • >1.5
• (Current assets / current liabilities) reflects the liquidity or solvency of the
assets /
Ensure on-going current • 5 to 15% business unit
profitability liabilities • This KPI reflects the profitability of the business unit as a percentage of
the business’s equity
• NPAT/Equity
Business Activities Council’s Competition and Water Reform Policy defines business
activities as those which trade in goods and services to clients and
could potentially be delivered by a private sector firm for the purposes
of earning profits in the absence of Council’s involvement. This
definition implies that there is a charge for and thus direct revenue from
the goods and services traded by those Business Units.
Business Units Those groups within Council with the lead carriage for each of the
business activities identified above.
Commercial Service The provision of services in a highly transparent and efficient and
Provision effective manner. Such transparency should be achieved through clear
directives from Council and robust financial and non-financial reporting.
A commercial Business Unit can be run either “for profit”, or “not for
profit”. Such outcomes should be defined by Council on a case by case
basis.
Community Service A Community Service Obligation (CSO) arises when Council wants a
Obligation Business Unit to carry out activities that they would not do on a
commercial basis. A CSO should be based on a directive by Council
and provide broader social benefit or community value to the region.
Community Value The broader value a Business Unit might provide to the region that is
beyond any direct commercial benefit that Council may receive from
the Business Units.
Business Model How a business creates value for its customers through its service
offerings, marketing strategies and tactics, pricing, and value
proposition
• The Shepton Quarry, which provides a mix of products external to Council and to Council
itself;
• The Mungabunda Quarry which provides products for Council’s own use; and
• The various borrow pits that are quarried to also provide products directly to Council.
This Business Plan has been developed to enable the Business Unit to:
• Deliver upon the relevant elements of Council’s Corporate and Operational Plans;
• Ensure that there is an understanding across Council on the long-term aspirations and
desired outcomes for the Quarry Business;
• Set the service requirements to help inform other key strategies such as asset
management, financial management, people management and governance;
• Ensure a line of sight from the overall Quarry Business’s objectives to its day to day
operations; and
• Provide a basis for decision making to continuously improve Quarry’s operations and as
such, inform long term capital and operational expenditure plans.
Inxure Strategy Group was engaged by Council to develop Strategic Business Plans for three
business units of Council (the Quarry Business, Emerald Airport and Saleyard). It was requested
that the plans:
This Business Plan has been developed using a generic 3-step process, as represented by the
following diagram. This is typical for most strategic planning exercises.
Future
•Assess the current state of the
business and its service
Aspirations •Develop a work program to
bridge the gap between current
outcomes •Set goals & objectives the state and future aspirations for
•Base this on input from staff and Quarry Business the Quarry Business
a range of reports undertaken •Base this on Council plans and •Prioritise the program based on
over the last 5 years input from various Council risk
stakeholders
• Financial management
• Resourcing talent management
Operating Model • Business Systems (Project/Risk/Quality
(How value is delivered) Management)
• Systems
• Governance (Board, Committees, Programs)
• Performance (Value) Measurement
Core Operations & Projects
(Delivery)
For CHRC, its overarching vision is realised through a combination of plans including the
Community Plan and Corporate Plan. CHRC’s vision is “to be a progressive region creating
opportunities for all”. Hence the value the Quarry Business delivers must align with that vision.
Once the value is determined (which is a combination of markets, products, services and price),
the Operating Model shapes how the value is delivered upon.
It is important that the Value Model be worked through iteratively – testing the alignment of each
of the facets. If for example CHRC sets goals that are not feasible – then the Quarry Business
may be set up to fail. Therefore, it may be necessary to reconsider the vision and strategy for
Quarry Business, based on a robust analysis of the Business Model and the Operating Model.
This report is structured around the facets of this “Value Model”. The CHRC’s vision and strategy
for the Quarry is discussed in section 5 of this report. The Business Model is then addressed in
section 6 and the Operating Model in section 7.
The region is rich in minerals and forms part of the Bowen Basin supporting a globally competitive
coal industry. The region also has the largest sapphire-producing fields in the Southern
Hemisphere.
Shepton Quarry was established by the former Peak Downs Shire Council in 1991. The Quarry
is located 25km east of Capella and 40km north of Emerald. The site incorporates a large open
cut pit, a fixed crushing plant, office facilities and weighbridge. The Quarry resource is rock that
is olivine basalt, a basic igneous rock described as strong, hard and durable. Quarry resource
mapping in 2014 confirmed resources at 39 million tonnes. This would allow for an 80-year life of
the Quarry based on an estimated 500,000 tonnes per year. Shepton Quarry, in the heart of the
Bowen Basin, supports product delivery to Capella, Emerald, Clermont and surrounding areas.
The quarry supplies NATA certified, hard rock product from a high-grade geological source for
civil and road building and maintenance projects.
The fixed crusher plant is a feature of the Shepton Quarry and represents a significant investment
in materials and equipment that was seen to be viable when the quarry was achieving high
production levels. Much of the value from the fixed plant is derived from its current use, and the
underlying infrastructure (concrete support pads etc) would have little salvage value. A key
learning from the installation of the fixed crusher plant investment is that future decision making
associated with major investments should be supported by a well-developed business case
providing analysis on projected returns on investment for various future demand scenarios.
Further gravel borrow pits (about 300 sites) are located throughout the Central Highlands region.
These sites are under the control of Council and are largely used for maintenance of Council’s
unsealed road network.
Whilst the quarry operations were initially established to provide aggregate and road base in-
house to council’s infrastructure and waste service areas, increasingly activities have expanded
to supply commercially to mining operations, Qld Department of Transport and Main Roads and
the public. Key customer groups include:
• Mining
• Local government
• State government
• Road construction
• Building construction
• Concrete manufacture
• Extractive industry
The Quarry is leased under a 30-year lease agreement which expires on 30 September 2040.
The lessors are Kenneth John Ross and Jo-Anne Phoebe Ross. The lease agreement allows for
5 extensions of 10 years each which covers the total expected life of the Quarry. The lease is
transferable subject to the lessor’s consent.
Council has in the order of 300 borrow pits across its region. Compliance audit of the borrow pits
is planned to be undertaken. Quarry may in future undertake a role in compliance management.
Demand for quarry products is linked to the economic activity within the mining and construction
sectors and the follow-on effect of increased urban development. Following what is referred to
as a resources ‘boom’ that peaked in 2012, the region has experienced a significant retraction
within these sectors until recently. In addition, significant investment in public infrastructure in
the region was initiated due to flood damage to roads between 2008 and 2015 within the Central
Highlands Region, amounting to $165M in road construction works. With this work nearing
completion, a decline in Government spending on road infrastructure at both State and Local
levels will continue to impact on demand for quarry products.
These drivers for demand had a strong impact on sales between 2009 and 2012. From 2013/14,
demand for products dropped off, but since then sales have been increasing by around 9% per
annum. The 18/19 financial year has seen a significant jump in production to:
One of the objectives of this Business Plan is to ensure the Quarry business’s products are
competitively priced. This is a key feature for ensuring the Quarry business delivers value back
to Council. As there is a competitive market for quarry products in the Central Highlands region,
the most effective means of ensuring the Quarry business’s prices are competitive, is for it to
compete in this market.
As the table above shows, 60% of the product from Shepton is sold externally. This translates to
over 35% of total sales for the business unit. The Quarry business in turn provides Council with
a $1.50 per tonne discount on the products sold internally for its infrastructure requirements. To
maintain this competitive pressure, a target of 60% has been set for external sales from Shepton.
Future demand of Quarry products within the region is identified through the following potential
opportunities:
250.00%
200.00%
150.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
-50.00%
-100.00%
-150.00%
In summary, the operating environment for the quarry has experienced significant flux in recent
years, as the regional economy adjusts to a post resources boom period, together with on-going
planned investments in public infrastructure. That said, a further adverse event associated with
flooding is likely to result in immediate demand for quarry products as part of any reconstruction
efforts.
1 https://www.economyprofile.com.au/centralhighlands/trends/gross-regional-product
Strengths Weaknesses
• Quality of Shepton product - basalt and • Location of the two quarry sites-
other products limitations to the area that can be
• The capabilities of the existing crushing serviced
plant allow the ability to provide a range • Limited agreement that quarry
of products operations contribute to core Council
• Ability to provide mobile crushing operations
services at multiple locations • The quarry is subject to OHS
• Securing of some 300 pit sites across the requirements of the Mining Act that is
region more stringent than Council’s statutory
• Capability and experience of staff (ex framework
Holcim) • Lean staffing levels- loss of key staff is
• Council’s delegation to adjust pricing to an issue
meet market conditions • IT, communications and services
• Customer focus and lowering of limitations to remote locations
production costs
Opportunities Threats
• Financial management
• Resourcing talent management
Operating Model • Business Systems (Project/Risk/Quality
(How value is delivered) Management)
• Systems
• Governance (Board, Committees, Programs)
• Performance (Value) Measurement
Core Operations & Projects
(Delivery)
The Value Model sees the purpose (or vision and strategy) being made up of:
The Central Highlands 2022 Community Plan is a region-wide plan with outcomes and goals
forming the basis of a long term ‘road map’ setting out the steps for the community to achieve its
vision. The Community Plan involved extensive community consultation and sets out the priorities
for each of the region’s 13 individual communities.
The Quarry Business Plan fits between the “Management Plan” and “Annual Operating Plan”
levels of Council’s overall Strategic Planning Framework. That is, the Quarry Business Plan is
guided by the Community Plan, Corporate Plan and Council’s Management Plans. The Business
Plan in turn informs the Annual Operational Plan, Budgets and Staff Performance Plans.
A clear indicator of the broader value that the quarry provides to the local and regional economy
is evidenced by its financial performance whereby external customers comprise 35% of the
quarry’s overall revenue. A range of factors underpin the attraction to broader industry customers,
however the quality of the product combined with the systems and processes that have been put
place to meet regulatory standards - means that contractors undertaking works for government
or mining operations include decision criteria that take account of quality of product and systems.
2
Benington, J., 2009. Creating the public in order to create public value? Intl Journal of Public
Administration 32, 232–249
For the Central Highlands, council’s quarry operations may be seen to deliver public value to the
local community in terms of Council’s Strategic Priorities as follows.
Building and
• The quarry operations ensure that good quality, cost effective
maintaining quality
materials are available to council and the wider industry
infrastructure
• Quarry materials contribute to durable pavement assets with lower
maintenance costs
Leadership and
• Council’s quarry products are produced based on robust Quality
governance
Assurance systems and processes
Our organisation
• The quarry business provides consistent high levels of customer
service in accordance with CHRC’s Customer Service Charter
• CHRC’s systems and processes provide industry with confidence
when using quarry services
• Ensure the Quarry Business and its operations meet all legislative requirements;
• Ensure planning of Quarry operations meets production targets in the most efficient and
cost-effective manner;
• Develop and maintain strong customer relationships to optimise opportunity for ongoing
sales;
• Produce quality quarry products within determined specification and customer needs;
• Develop operator training plans to ensure competent and skilled quarry operators;
• Develop and maintain preventative maintenance plans to ensure optimal production from
Quarry plant and equipment;
• Regularly review cost of production information to ensure competitive pricing and
achievable profit targets;
• Ensure operation in accordance with the Quarry’s Quality and Safety Management
Systems.
The vision and objectives for the current business plan are set out in Figure 8 below. These have
been based on the analysis of the Quarry Business’s links to Council’s Corporate Plan, the public
value it offers, and consideration of the objectives outlined in the Quarry’s 2014 Business Plan.
An explanation of this vision and the associated objectives and outcomes is provided below:
• The vision and objectives reflect the fact that the Quarry provides public value, beyond that
of a private sector run business activity. However, the Quarry must run with the discipline
of a private sector organisation;
• The importance to the Central Highlands Region of Council running their own quarry
operations is two-fold.
o Firstly, it ensures there is a constant provider of high quality and compliant quarry
products to the region. This benefit is demonstrated by the fact that a number of
Components
• Financial management
• Resourcing talent management
Operating Model • Business Systems (Project/Risk/Quality
(How value is delivered) Management)
• Systems
• Governance (Board, Committees, Programs)
• Performance (Value) Measurement
Core Operations & Projects
(Delivery)
An understanding of the basis of the value proposition for the Quarry Business Unit will inform the
group’s business model. As outlined in the previous section, the general principles underpinning
the Quarry’s business model include:
• The Quarry Business provides wider community value, and this should be built upon; and
• The Quarry is a commercial business unit seeking to be commercially self-sufficient of
Council and to run profitably.
* Adapted from Needham, Dave (1996). “Business for Higher Awards”. Oxford, England: Heinemann
The Quarry produces quality basalt rock products that are angular in shape and very strong, ideal
for road base as the pieces lock together which enhances road durability. Basalt is a dark-
coloured, very strong, fine-grained igneous rock, and is also used for concrete aggregate, asphalt
pavement aggregate, railroad ballast, filter stone in drains, and many other purposes. The Quarry
has approval from the Department of Transport and Main Roads for the production of aggregate
for the production of hot mix (asphalt) by others.
The quarry business is capable of producing quality ‘in specification’ road base products and
delivering material supply at controlled costs internally to Council. Products meet the following
technical specifications:
A key feature of the Shepton Quarry operations is the fixed crushing plant comprising four
crushers and associated conveyors and operating plant. As such it is capable of (but not limited
to) producing the major products outlined in Table 1 below.
The quarry business has previously supplied precoated aggregate for road pavements. This
market is seen to be highly profitable, and plans are currently in place to re-establish facilities for
pre-coated aggregate production.
The further development of the mobile quarry production model has been identified as a key
opportunity that can provide significant value to Council internal operations and road construction
operations throughout the region. The use of mobile crushers has now been effectively piloted by
the quarry business unit adding to a more diversified product mix with potentially lower cost due
to lower transport costs.
In May 2014 a flexible pricing model was implemented by Council to facilitate the Quarry
Business’s competitiveness within the quarry product market. Council’s pricing policy ensures
that certain delegated authorities are available to officers in order to respond to market soundings
for products in a timely and competitive manner.
The Quarry Business has a production cost model for different modes of production. Pricing is
based on this model, plus an appropriate margin, depending on the market. Delegations are then
set for both the Operations Coordinator – Shepton Quarry and the General Manager Customer
and Commercial Services in respect of approving the final price for products. It is also noted that
over 60% of Shepton’s products are sold into an external competitive market, which also places
downward pressure on prices.
Quarries provide a range of extractive materials, such as sand, gravel, crushed rock and clay,
which are processed and used as raw inputs for buildings and construction, agriculture and
industrial purposes. It is estimated that 90% of the output from quarries in Australia is used within
the building and construction industries. These extractive resources (or aggregates) include
processed rock, gravel and sand products that are used to build houses, schools, roads, bridges,
commercial and industrial buildings, airports, railways and other basic infrastructure.
Unlike mining for metals or coal, extractive materials (including road base, aggregate, sand and
clay) are high volume, low-cost materials that need to be extracted and ideally processed as close
as possible to the communities that use them. This is due to the high relative cost of transporting
low-cost heavy materials. Utilising extractive materials from outside the region brings with it
significant social, environmental and economic costs. However, the cost of transport also needs
Strategic quarry locations should be sourced, assessed for feasibility, and licenced. Quarry
location is of the utmost significance, as aggregates are low-value relative to weight, so increasing
the distance over which they are transported from quarry to road construction site adds
significantly to costs. Having strategic placed quarries throughout the Council area would enable
Council to pass on cost effectiveness for road reconstruction works, whilst maintaining a profitable
return with an overall cost benefit to the community.
The Shepton Quarry is well located in the heart of the Bowen Basin, and supports product delivery
to Capella, Emerald, Clermont and surrounding areas. The establishment of the Mungabunda
Quarry and the broader use of regional pits has allowed the quarry to extend its geographic reach
and supply to the southern part of the Central Highlands region. Having strategically placed
quarry operations, particularly in the south of the region allow the quarry to meet the requirements
of council and support other remote civil construction activities.
The Quarry Business uses both Council trucks and private contractors for delivery of products.
The use of private contractors for cartage purposes provides the Quarry with an additional
revenue opportunity, whereby a profit margin is included in the overall cost to the customer. Cost
of cartage however can be prohibitive in the catchment market, which is identified as
approximately a 70-kilometre radius from the Quarry. Costs of cartage beyond this area can
restrict the Quarry in its ability to compete with quarries located closer to customer sites
Quarry Description
Quarries of Quarries of Queensland operates the Eureka Quarry located 23 kilometres east
Queensland of Capella in the Lilyvale Mining Area. This is the closest quarry to Council’s
Shepton Quarry
Blackwater Quarry Offers an extensive range of construction products either custom made for
individual requirements or as general industry standard products. This includes
aggregates; ready mixed concrete, high performance ready mixed concrete and
can undertake a range of precast concrete products.
The following initiatives have been formalised as part of the Quarry Business’s marketing
activities:
• The development of a client database (comprising past, existing and prospective clients)
• supporting the local economy through collaborative partnerships with the business
community;
• ensuring that good quality, cost effective materials are available to council and the wider
industry;
• facilitating commercial opportunities in the region where cost effective quarry materials are
critical in the construction of economic infrastructure;
• supporting a resilient regional economy when faced with adverse climate events;
• effectively managing safety;
• through a focus on rehabilitation, leaving sites in better condition than before;
• providing consistently high levels of customer service in accordance with CHRC’s
Customer Service Charter; and
• having systems and processes that provide industry with confidence in using quarry
services.
As a commercial business unit, the consideration of providing value to the community must be
balanced with commercial considerations. For quarry services, maintaining a profitable business
is equally important. In order to maintain profitability, the focus needs to continue on building both
external and internal customer relationships and identifying new opportunities to support various
construction activities throughout the region.
7.1 Overview
This section of the report focusses on the Operating Model for the Quarry Business and examines
how value is delivered. This section specifically considers the people capability, processes and
systems necessary to deliver upon the desired vision and objectives for the Quarry, and to support
its business model (discussed in the previous section).
Components
• Financial management
• Resourcing talent management
Operating Model • Business Systems (Project/Risk/Quality
(How value is delivered) Management)
• Systems
• Governance (Board, Committees, Programs)
• Performance (Value) Measurement
Core Operations & Projects
(Delivery)
When considering the operating model, it is important to note that the Quarry is grouped with
other commercial business units within the Customer and Commercial Services division of
Council (including the Airport, Saleyard and Housing Services). This allows Council to achieve
synergies in the operation of these business units. As a result, a number of initiatives identified
in this section of the Plan can be progressed co-operatively with the other business units.
Furthermore, the 3 business units receive a range of corporate services from other divisions of
council including, Council wide financial management, asset management, HR services, IT
services and capital delivery services.
The following table summarises the Quarry business’s key risks, along with their respective
mitigations. This risk assessment has been adapted from the 2015 Business Plan and it remains
relevant. These risks are also considered in the following analysis of the Operating Model.
It is noted that the “Loss of Key Personnel” remains as a high risk while there is uncertainty about
the quarry’s on-going operations in light of the Expression of Interest process. While this process
is running, Council is reluctant to invest in more permanent resourcing for the quarry business,
which places pressure on the existing personnel.
The Quarry has identified the following growth opportunities, which could in turn lead to the need
for future service planning:
These growth opportunities are likely to require some level of capital investment to bring them to
fruition. Council’s past experience should not result in it avoiding such opportunities, but rather
improving the investment decision making process. There are a number of state-based
processes available from Departments such as Treasury or Building Queensland. Council should
adopt and where necessary adapt these processes for application within its commercial business
units such as the Quarry. A key part of such decision-making is undertaking long term financial
modelling to determine the possible impacts of such investments under a range of scenarios.
Through this model, AMPs have been established for all asset types including the Quarry. It is
then up to each asset custodian to:
The Quarry has a relatively high percentage of mechanical and electrical equipment. Furthermore, the is
equipment is essential to the production of product for sale. If this equipment fails, then the quarry’s
operations and revenues cease to flow. As a consequence, the Quarry has a robust preventative
maintenance plan for its “active assets”.
It will be important to both further optimize the AMP and develop an appropriate renewals plan.
Depreciation makes up a large proportion of the Quarry’s cost base and it compromises its ability
to operate with a positive operating position. Management needs to be satisfied that this figure
is as robust as possible and is thus informing sound management decisions.
Linked to the optimization of depreciation, is the need to have in place a robust renewals plan for
the facility. The goal of this plan is to maintain the service potential of the facility and it ideally
should have a 5 to 10-year outlook. If both the depreciation figure and the renewals plan are
robust, then there should be a broad matching between the two.
To this end, the Queensland Government legislates for Councils to measure the renewals capital
expenditure as a percentage of the depreciation expense (referred to as the Asset Sustainability
Ratio). This is an approximation of the extent to which infrastructure assets are being renewed
to maintain their intended service potential. The Queensland Audit Office (QAO) then reports
annually on this metric for all Councils. They will report a red for fail if the renewals expenditure
is well short of the depreciation figure (the target is 90%). This highlights the importance of both
figures being as robust as possible, otherwise:
• If the renewal expenditure is below what it should be (due to the absence of a renewals
plan), then it indicates that the service potential of the asset is being run down. It may also
be possible that the Council’s long-term financial sustainability is being compromised as it
is not setting aside the funds to renew or replace these assets; and
Optimising the AMPs and developing a long-term renewals plan for the facility are important
actions for this business plan. Specific considerations for optimizing the depreciation allowance
are addressed in section 7.5 below.
1. The Shepton Quarry, which sells in the order of 60% of its product externally and the
remainder is provided directly to Council for its infrastructure activities;
2. Mungabunda Quarry, which provides product exclusively to Council for its infrastructure
activities; and
3. The numerous borrow pits that are operated across the Central Highlands region, which
provide product exclusively to Council for its infrastructure activities.
Hence, the 18/19 financial year result positions the Quarry well to realise its objectives of being a
profitable business unit into the future and applying competitive pressure on quarry product prices
across the region. Furthermore, it provides a sound platform for considering a number of the
growth opportunities outlined in 7.3 of this business plan.
Quite detailed and informative “Operating and Expense Statements” are produced quarterly for
the Quarry. However, it is noted that not all “full cost pricing elements” of Council’s Competition
and Water Reform Policy are applied within these statements. At present there is no inclusion of
a tax equivalent payment. Furthermore, as the quarry should be run at a profit, then there should
also be a return on capital that should in part flow back to the Council as a dividend. Hence, to
allow a full view of the commercial performance and position of the Quarry, it is recommended
that the statements be restructured to incorporate the following:
Earnings before interest, tax and depreciation (EBITDA) Operating revenue, less operating
expense
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) EBITDA less depreciation
Earnings before tax (EBT) EBIT less finance costs
Net profit after tax (NPAT) EBT less tax equivalent
Also, to make more informed commercial decisions there should be a balance sheet and cash
flow statement for the Quarry. The balance sheet would provide important information in relation
to the capital structure (debt and equity) and enable linkages to be made to the income statement
(i.e. depreciation and finance costs), as well as to retained earnings and reserves. The cash flow
statement provides critical information regarding the inflows and outflows of cash, along with and
understanding of the business unit’s solvency.
A further consideration for the Quarry business is maintaining an accurate balance sheet. At
present there are a number of issues the business should be examining in relation to its Balance
Sheet, including:
• The rehabilitation costs for the various quarry sites needs to be reviewed and made
contemporary. The value of this liability for Shepton is based on some unsubstantiated
costs from approximately 5 years ago. The business needs to update the valuation of this
liability for Shepton;
• The current allowance in the Balance Sheet for rehabilitation at Mungabunda or the other
borrow pits appears understated. It is noted that Council has just initiated a piece or work
to help define its obligations in respect of these other sites;
• In respect of these rehabilitation costs, they should be measured at the present value of
the expected cash flows that will be required to perform the rehabilitation. The cost of the
‘provision’ should then be recognised as part of the cost of the asset when it is put in place
and depreciated over the asset’s useful life. A further consideration for the Quarry
business is whether the entire liability is recognised when quarrying activity begins or
whether it is recognised in increments as the activity is undertaken. This will need to be
resolved by the business in conjunction with Council;
• This leads to a further consideration for the Quarry business, which is that it presently does
not recognise the lease for Shepton Quarry in its Balance Sheet (or the other sites for that
matter). The incoming accounting standard AASB16, which will apply from 30 June 2019,
will require Council to include any operating leases in their Balance Sheet. Council will
need to assess whether the current lease agreement is captured by the requirements of
AASB16. Given Council is regonising the rehabilitation liability associated with Shepton, it
is likely this will need to be associated with an asset, being the lease for the site; and
• It is noted that Council is setting aside a provision within its reserves for the rehabilitation
of the Shepton site (currently in the order of $200,000). Council should consider whether
this needs to be recognised as an asset within the Quarry business’s Balance Sheet.
This work may re-value the annual provision being made for the cost of rehabilitating Shepton
and the other sites. Any such changes will also need to be reflected in the P&L.
It would be prudent for the business unit to review the current approach to the accounting
depreciation to better understand how it has been determined and identify if any of these factors
could or should be reviewed. Considerations should include:
• Be based on QTC’s long term financial models, thus allowing them to be rolled up into
Council’s overarching long term financial plans;
• Be structured around the recommendations above relating to the financial statements;
• Be based on robust projections of costs and capital programs;
• For the Quarry, be for a minimum of 5 years;
• Model a range of scenarios, including a worst-case revenue option, a “break even” option
and a revenue stretch option;
• The modelling can be used for investment planning on new revenue earning opportunities
for the Quarry.
The actual plans are held and maintained by the Commercial Analyst. Outputs from these plans
are provided in Appendix F of this document. It should be noted that the plans are living
documents and the inputs are to be refined over the life of this Business Plan.
Policy Description
Competition and Water
• Identifies the commercial business units within Council to
Reform Policy
which this policy applies;
• This includes the Quarry; and
• Identifies the full cost pricing elements that must be applied
to these business units.
Reserves Policy
• Relates to the creation and maintenance of reserves to
enable sound and prudent financial management of
Council and its various business activities;
• Reserves can cover untied infrastructure contributions not
used in a given year and the accumulation of depreciation
funding for infrastructure assets.
Asset Accounting Policy
• The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance, clarity
and consistency regarding the treatment of capital
expenditure, depreciation, revaluations, disposals and
acquisitions which will provide greater understanding and
accuracy of Council’s capital requirements
• Clearly defining the commercial expectations Council has of the business unit;
• Clearly defining what costs the business unit should be accounting for and ensuring there
is a robust basis those costs (e.g. corporate overheads);
• Ensuring the business is able to properly account for the cost of maintaining the service
potential of its assets (depreciation);
• Ensuring there is financial capacity for the business to maintain the service potential of its
assets (either through retained earnings or borrowing the necessary funds); and
• Clearly defining what funds can be taken by Council at year-end without compromising the
business unit’s financial sustainability (e.g. a tax equivalent payment).
When reviewing the current suite of commercial policies against these requirements:
• Council has not clearly defined its commercial expectations for the Quarry. This is
addressed in this Business Plan;
• Council does clearly define in its Competition Policy the costs the business units should be
accounting for. However, this is not being fully applied;
• Council does not have a robust method for determining corporate overheads;
• Council does clearly define how to account for the cost of maintaining the service potential
of its assets, but this policy is not correctly applied;
• Council’s Reserves Policy does allow for retained earnings to fund depreciation at the
Quarry, but this is not applied. It is noted that the current Policy gives the GM of Corporate
Services the discretion whether or not to set aside reserves for depreciation; and
• No existing policy defines what funds can be taken from the business units at the year-end.
It is recommended therefore, that Council reviews the application of its Commercial Policies to
enable its various business units to be financially sustainable. It is also recommended that the
Competition and Water Reform Policy be amended to define what funds can be taken from the
business units at the year-end.
It is recommended that the Quarry, along with the other business units within the Customer and
Commercial Services division, provide separate year-end reports to Council on their financial and
non-financial performance for that year. As part of that year-end reporting, the business units
should recommend to Council, what funds should be retained to cover depreciation and what
funds can be taken from the business unit without compromising its financial sustainability.
Should Council elect to adopt a different position to that recommended, their reasoning would
then be clearly and transparently spelt out. This should also help inform a different course of
action for the business unit to help maintain its financial sustainability.
General Manager
Customer and
Commercial
Services
Coordinator
Operations -
Shepton Quarry
Weighbridge
Quarry Operator Quarry Operator Administration Plant Fitter Quarry
Officer Officer
It is noted that a proposal has been put forward for the Plant Fitter role to become an SSE for the
borrow pit operations. This would assist council comply with its regulatory obligations and
potentially assist further with business opportunities in this area of the business.
The Quarry is open for business during the hours of 6.30 am to 3.30 pm on Monday to Thursday
and 6.30 am to 3.00 pm on Fridays. However, if sales permit or crushing is taking place the site
is open longer and sometimes Saturdays.
The operations at Shepton Quarry have been subject of on-going optimisation. Recent upgrades
to the Shepton site include the fixed crushing plant to run solely on generator power this will
eliminate the need for mains power to run the crushing plant.
Future plans include provision to install a facility to enable Shepton to supply pre-coated
aggregates to the market, extending its product portfolio and another source of revenue for the
quarry business.
The Quarry receives a range of Corporate Services from Council to support its operations,
including corporate finance, corporate Asset Management, IT services, HR and safety services,
and capital delivery services via the newly established PMO with the Infrastructure and Utilities
division of Council. The need to improve the transparency of both the costs and standard of
corporate services has been identified during the development of this Business Plan. This could
be done by putting in place simple Service Level Agreements, or other mechanisms as seen fit.
An option used successfully in other jurisdictions, is the “business partner” model where personnel
from the Corporate Service providers embed themselves within the business units and develop
an intimate understanding of their requirements. It is also recommended that corporate
overheads be reviewed as they are a material input to the Quarry’s cost base.
• Identifying key roles for the business units and ensuring there are successors for those
roles;
• Seeking external mentors for key personnel to help build commercial acumen;
• Planning the exit of employees reaching retirement age. This could include using them to
actively coach and mentor younger staff members;
• Organising secondments across Council and with other organisations to broaden the
experience of key staff members; and
• Working in partnership with the local University and/or schools to promote Council as an
attractive place to work.
Safety is a key issue for quarry operations and is principally regulated under the Queensland
Government Department of Natural Resources and Mines that regularly audit and inspect the
quarry operations. The safety management system is documented and is regularly audited.
Resource extraction management and site rehabilitation plans are developed and utilised to
ensure that cost effective disturbance is balanced with considerations of impact and that
rehabilitation of the landform is undertaken ensuring sites are suitable for an appropriate use into
the future.
The environmentally relevant activities at the Quarry must be carried out by such reasonable and
practicable means necessary to prevent the emission or likelihood of emission of noise that
constitutes an unreasonable intrusive noise. The reasonable and practicable measures adopted
for the Quarry are incorporated into the relevant procedure(s) implemented under the Site Based
Management Plan. Dust management controls are in place for the purposes of achieving
compliance with the operational conditions of the Shepton Quarry licence, and to minimize
Specifically, Quarry products are subject to extensive quality control testing and technical support.
Quarry operations require a range of compliance testing for aggregates, rocks, pavement
materials, soils and provides quality control testing for all of quarry products. The Quarry is
certified for the supply of quarry product under AS/NZS/ISO9001:2008. Certified by Sci Qual
International Pty Ltd on 1 July 2015.
The quarry is also capable of producing quality ‘in specification’ road base products and delivering
material supply at controlled costs internally to Council. Products meet the following technical
specifications:
• In the 18/19 financial year, Shepton made up 61% of total Sales for the Quarry business
unit. Furthermore, the remaining sales from Mungabunda and Council’s borrow pits, are
exclusively to Council. If Shepton was sold, the Quarry Business would no longer
constitute a business activity as defined by Council’s Water Reform and Competition
Policy. The unit would become an internal service provider - principally to the Infrastructure
and Utilities division of Council;
• Should that occur, Council should revisit this plan and determine if it is still required and if
so, what modifications are required to be made to it;
• It is noted that during the Expression of Interest process, Council has put a freeze on any
capital expenditure and appointment of permanent staff within the Quarry business. While
this is most likely an appropriate course of action, it must be noted that it is both inefficient
and is holding the Quarry business back from achieving its longer-term goals. The
business unit is having to appoint contractors at a high cost and a lack of capital investment
means that the asset service potential is being run down and opportunities for growth are
being delayed or missed. It would be important that council expedite the sale process to
provide certainty for the business unit, one way or another;
• If Council were to sell the Shepton quarry business, it would lose a revenue stream that
currently covers a range of costs that exist after a sale process. These costs are estimated
to be in the order of $5million and are spelt out in further detail in section 8.2 below; and
• Any sale will have balance sheet implications for Council, which should not be overlooked.
An overall asset write-down will be required. Should the value of this write down exceed
the sale price, then Council would record a one-off loss in the year of the sale. While it
would be a “paper” loss, it would potentially have broader reputational impacts for Council,
particularly if it puts the entire Council position into a loss for the year.
It is also noted that should any sale proceed; Council would need to record an asset write-down
in the year of the sale. The 18/19 Balance Sheet shows that such a write-down would be in the
order of $3,500,000. This represents the net of the current assets and liabilities: less the loan for
the quarry, which Council would retain even if the quarry were sold. It should also be noted that
as of 30 June 2019, Council will most likely need to record the lease for the Shepton Quarry as
an asset, so the above figure could increase.
Finally, it is worth noting some of the factors that could influence the value of any offers for the
Shepton quarry business:
• The value of the offer will be determined by whether or not the prospective purchaser sees
Shepton as a going concern. If they do, then they should value the business based on
prospective future cash flows, less costs. If not, then any price would be based on the
scrap value of the assets;
• Unless Council guarantees to purchase a certain amount of product from Shepton, Council
has no forward contracts that underpin future revenue streams for Shepton. This stands
to reason given the uncertainty associated with the EoI process;
• The prospective purchasers are likely to discount any offers, by their estimate of the cost
to rehabilitate the site; and
• If any inventory is sold with the business, this should be factored into the sale price by the
prospective purchaser. Alternatively, Council could sell this inventory themselves ahead
of the sale if they felt this was more financially beneficial.
Corporate Overheads Cost $1,800,000 These costs are fixed and would need to be borne by
Council following any sale (the 18/19 overheads applied
to Shepton were $230,000).
Interest Cost $1,300,000 This is the NPV of the interest cost on the remaining
$8.5million loan for the quarry.
Loss of Profit & Tax $1,000,000 This is based on the net profit (including tax equivalents)
Equivalents of $130,000 for Shepton for the 18/19 financial year (net
of movement in inventory). This was a normal trading
year, with no abnormal economic conditions such as a
mining boom or large volumes of flood works. This
revenue stream would in part cover the principal
component of the quarry loan.
Loss of Buffer to Economic With Shepton and the other quarry sites, Council is able
Cycles to meet all of its own needs. If Shepton is sold, it is likely
Council would have to purchase a percentage of quarry
product from the private sector. Hence it would be
exposed to price fluctuations (good and bad) due to
external economic cycles.
Site Rehabilitation Current revenue streams from Shepton cover the costs of
the site’s rehabilitation. This liability would presumably be
transferred with any sale and be factored into the sale
price.
Total $4,100,000
Table 7 – Council Related Costs covered by the Current Revenue Stream from Shepton
The measures reflect the outcomes the business unit is working to. These measures are to be cascaded
through to individual performance plans and would pick up the important inputs to achieving these outcomes
(for example, carrying out safety training or conducting periodic safety audits of the facilities). Collectively
the measures will provide a basis for a “balanced scorecard” on performance across the three objectives
for the Quarry.
• Product
• The product growth measure is aimed at ensuring the business unit
growth
Provide continues to innovate and adapt to meet its customer’s needs
competitively • External • 1 / year
• Maintaining external sales from Shepton above 60%, ensures the
priced, high- Sales / Total
• >60% Quarry’s rates are market competitive and thus sets the benchmark for
quality quarry Sales
what it charges Council for its products
products across • 100%
• Achieve
the Central compliance • Product quality is an important differentiator for the Quarry and is thus an
MRD’s
Highlands Region important performance measure. The key benchmark is the Main Road’s
quality
Specifications
specifications
To safely and
profitably provide
• The Asset Sustainability Ratio reflects the service and financial
competitively • Asset
priced, high- sustainability of the business unit. Specially this measures the actual
Sustainability
quality quarry renewal spend, plus reserves set aside for depreciation, divided by the
Ratio
products for the Provide fit for • 90% depreciation allowance
benefit of the purpose, safe and • Material audit
• Zero • Being compliant with its many obligations is critical for the business
Central Highland’s compliant quarry non-
activity and this target is focused on ensuring there are no material audit
region facilities compliance • Zero non-compliances
• Lost Time
• Safety is an important outcome for Council and the target always needs to
Injuries
be one of zero harm
• Current • >1.5
• (Current assets / current liabilities) reflects the liquidity or solvency of the
assets /
Ensure on-going current • 5 to 15% business unit
profitability liabilities • This KPI reflects the profitability of the business unit as a percentage of
the business’s equity
• NPAT/Equity
Title Requirement
Council Accountable:
Operations Responsible:
Coordinator -
• Preparing the Business Plan
Shepton Quarry
• Reporting on the Plan’s implementation
To execute this Business Plan, the Operations Coordinator - Shepton Quarry will prepare annual
budgets which shall be derived from information within this Plan, along with any emerging issues
that may arise over the life of the Plan. Furthermore, the Operations Coordinator - Shepton Quarry
will report on their progress against the key initiatives in the Business Plan.
This Business Plan has a 3-year outlook and will be reviewed at least every 3 years or when there
is a major change in the assumptions underpinning this Plan.
CHRC Quarry A Gantt chart outlining tasks and timeframes in developing a marketing
Sales Strategy strategy for the quarry
Implementation
Plan
Shepton Quarry The Business Plan sets out goals and objectives for the business,
Business Plan including financial forecasts and based on various sales scenarios over
November 2015 ten years
Asset Provides an assessment of asset condition and replacement value
Management Plan ensuring a consistent approach to asset management and planning and
Shepton Quarry on-going financial viability.
2015/16
Likelihood
Council’s Enterprise Risk Management Framework then recommends the following general risk
strategies and actions for the various risk severities:
Low Continue to monitor and re-evaluate the This risk can be accepted if there are no
risk, treat with routine procedures. readily available treatments. Must be
regularly monitored and acted upon
appropriately.
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
8% 7.0
6.0
6% 5.0
4.0
4%
3.0
2% 2.0
1.0
-% -
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Operating surplus ratio DILGP—lower bound DILGP—upper bound Cash expense cover ratio QTC—lower bound
250%
200%
200%
150%
150%
100%
100%
50%
50%
-% -%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Net financial liabilities ratio DILGP—upper bound Asset sustainability ratio QTC—lower bound
Council controlled revenue ratio (%) Average useful life of depreciable assets (years)
100% 25.0
90%
80% 20.0
70%
60% 15.0
50%
40% 10.0
30%
20% 5.0
10%
-% -
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Council controlled revenue ratio QTC—lower bound Average useful life of depreciable assets
Total debt service cover ratio (times) Capital expenditure ratio (times)
4.0x 800%
3.5x 700%
3.0x 600%
2.5x 500%
2.0x 400%
1.5x 300%
1.0x 200%
0.5x 100%
- -%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Total debt service cover ratio QTC—lower bound Capital expenditure ratio
Operating surplus ratio 0% to 10% na na na na 5.7% 4.7% 5.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.7% 1.0% 1.2% 1.5% 1.8% 5.9%
na na na na 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Cash expense cover ratio > 3 months na na na na 1.4 0.5 (2.8) (1.3) 0.2 1.7 3.2 4.8 6.4 8.0 9.5
na na na na 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Asset sustainability ratio > 90% na na na na -% -% 200.8% 22.8% 22.1% 21.4% 20.8% 20.2% 19.6% 19.1% 30.9%
na na na na 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Average useful life of depreciable assets na na na na 18.1 17.8 23.5 11.3 10.1 9.0 8.0 6.9 5.9 5.0 7.3
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
Net financial liabilities ratio <= 60% na na na na 181.8% 255.7% 274.4% 262.1% 248.7% 234.7% 220.9% 207.0% 193.2% 179.5% 167.0%
na na na na 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Council controlled revenue ratio > 60% na na na na 20.7% 33.8% 33.8% 33.9% 33.8% 33.8% 33.7% 33.6% 33.5% 33.4% 33.3%
na na na na 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total debt service cover ratio > 2 times na na na na 2.5x 0.6x 2.8x 0.7x 1.2x 2.9x 3.1x 3.2x 3.3x 3.4x 3.5x
na na na na 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Capital expenditure ratio na na na na na na 6.7x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.3x
na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Operating result ($'000) Operating efficiency ratio (%) Sales, contracts and recoverable works margin (%)
7,000 120% 100%
6,000 90%
100%
80%
5,000
80% 70%
4,000 60%
3,000 60% 50%
40%
2,000 40%
30%
1,000 20%
20%
- 10%
Jun-18AJun-19AJun-20BJun-21FJun-22F Jun-23FJun-24F Jun-25FJun-26F Jun-27FJun-28FJun-29F -% -%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Operating result Operating revenue Operating expenses Operating efficiency ratio (%) Sales, contracts and recoverable works margin (%)
Operating surplus ratio (%) Debtor and creditor days Interest to debt and interest to cash balance ratios (%)
7% 120 6%
5%
6% 100 4%
5% 3%
80 2%
4% 1%
60
3% -%
-1%
40
2% -2%
20 -3%
1%
-4%
-% - -5%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Gross interest expense as a portion of average term debt (%)
Operating surplus ratio (%) Creditor days Debtor days Interest revenue as a portion of average cash (%)
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Operating revenue - 6,539 4,503 4,603 4,689 4,794 4,913 5,034 5,158 5,285 5,416 5,550 na -5.6% -1.6%
Operating expenses - 6,169 4,290 4,372 4,681 4,774 4,881 4,986 5,094 5,205 5,320 5,220 na -4.6% -1.7%
Operating result - 370 214 231 8 20 33 48 64 80 96 330 na -38.5% -1.1%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Rateable properties vs. general rates per rateable property ($) Council FTEs vs. average wages & salaries per FTE ($) LGA population vs. rateable properties
18,000 1 600 1,400 35,000 2.14
16,000 1 1,200 2.12
500 30,000
14,000 1
FTEs
1 300 20,000
10,000 600 2.06
1 15,000
8,000 200 2.04
0 400
10,000
6,000 100 2.02
0 200
4,000 5,000 2.00
0 - -
2,000 0 Jun-19AJun-20BJun-21FJun-22FJun-23FJun-24FJun-25FJun-26FJun-27FJun-28FJun-29F - 1.98
- -
Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Elected officials (LHS) Staff FTEs (LHS)
Rateable properties (LHS) Average general rates per rateable property ($) (RHS) Contractor FTEs (LHS) Average wages & salaries (RHS) Residents per rateable property (RHS) Population (LHS) Rateable properties (LHS)
Council FTEs
Elected officials - 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 na -% -%
Staff FTEs (excluding contractors) - 502 503 505 505 508 508 511 511 511 513 513 na 0.3% 0.2%
Contractor FTEs - - - - - - - - - - - - na na na
Total FTEs 481 511 512 514 514 517 517 520 520 520 522 522 3.5% 0.3% 0.2%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Net financial liabilities ratio (%) Council controlled revenue ratio (%) Self generated revenue ratio (%)
300% 40% 120%
35%
250% 100%
30%
200% 80%
25%
150% 20% 60%
100% 15%
40%
10%
50% 20%
5%
-% -% -%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Net financial liabilities ratio (%) Council controlled revenue ratio (%) Self generated revenue ratio (%)
Total debt service cover ratio (times) Interest cover ratio (times) Net operating cash flow as a percentage of net capital expenditure (%)
4.0x 3.0x 700%
3.5x 600%
2.5x
3.0x
500%
2.0x
2.5x
400%
2.0x 1.5x
300%
1.5x
1.0x
200%
1.0x
0.5x 100%
0.5x
- - -%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Total debt service cover ratio (times) Interest cover ratio (times) Net operating cash flow as a percentage of net capital expenditure (%)
Key metrics
Net financial liabilities ratio (%) -% 181.8% 255.7% 274.4% 262.1% 248.7% 234.7% 220.9% 207.0% 193.2% 179.5% 167.0% 181.8% 255.1% 224.3%
Council controlled revenue ratio (%) -% 20.7% 33.8% 33.8% 33.9% 33.8% 33.8% 33.7% 33.6% 33.5% 33.4% 33.3% 20.7% 33.8% 33.6%
Self generated revenue ratio (%) -% 106.0% 105.0% 105.3% 100.2% 100.4% 100.7% 101.0% 101.2% 101.5% 101.8% 106.3% 106.0% 102.3% 102.3%
Total debt service cover ratio (times) - 2.5x 0.6x 2.8x 0.7x 1.2x 2.9x 3.1x 3.2x 3.3x 3.4x 3.5x 2.5 1.7 2.5
Interest cover ratio (times) - 2.5x 2.1x 2.1x 2.0x 2.1x 2.1x 2.2x 2.3x 2.3x 2.3x 2.4x 2.5 2.1 2.2
Net operating cash flow as a percentage of net capital expenditure (%) -% -% -% 25.7% 439.4% 466.6% 490.3% 515.0% 540.2% 566.0% 591.7% 555.0% -% 355.5% 465.5%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Operating revenues—by category ($'000) Operating revenues—percentage of total operating revenue (%) Operating revenues—annual growth rates (%)
7,000 100% 700%
90% 600%
6,000
80% 500%
5,000 70% 400%
60%
4,000 300%
50%
200%
3,000 40%
100%
2,000 30%
-%
20%
1,000 -100%
10%
-% -200%
-
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Total Net rates, levies and charges Fees and charges
Net rates, levies and charges Fees and charges Operating grants and subsidies Net rates, levies and charges Fees and charges Operating grants and subsidies Operating grants and subsidies Sales revenue Interest received
Sales revenue Interest received Other operating income Sales revenue Interest received Other operating income Other operating income
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Interest received na -% 0.3% 0.3% -% 0.0% 0.3% 0.6% 0.8% 1.1% 1.3% 1.6% -% 0.2% 0.6%
Other operating income na 79.3% 65.9% 65.9% 66.1% 66.1% 65.9% 65.8% 65.6% 65.4% 65.3% 65.1% 79.3% 66.0% 65.7%
Total na 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Operating expenses—by category ($'000) Operating expenses—percentage of total operating revenue (%) Operating expenses—annual growth rates (%)
7,000 100% 120%
90% 100%
6,000
80% 80%
5,000 70%
60%
60%
4,000 40%
50%
3,000 20%
40%
-%
2,000 30%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
20% -20%
1,000
10% -40%
- -% -60%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Employee benefits Materials and services Depreciation and amortisation Employee benefits Materials and services Depreciation and amortisation Total Employee benefits Materials and services
Finance costs Other operating expenses Finance costs Other operating expenses Depreciation and amortisation Finance costs Other operating expenses
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Total na 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Asset sustainability ratio (%) Asset renewal funding ratio (%) Depreciation as a percentage of closing written down value of property,
250% 100% plant & equipment (%)
90% 25%
200% 80%
70% 20%
150% 60%
50% 15%
100% 40%
10%
30%
50% 20% 5%
10%
-% -% -%
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Asset sustainability ratio (%) Asset renewal funding ratio (%) Depreciation as a percentage of closing written down value of property, plant & equipment (%)
Capital expenditure ratio (times) Average useful life by asset class Community equity ($'000)
8.0x 25 15,000
7.0x 20
10,000
6.0x 15
5.0x 5,000
10
4.0x
5 -
3.0x
-
2.0x (5,000)
Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
1.0x Average useful life of depreciable assets Land improvements
Buildings Plant & equipment (10,000)
-
Furniture & fittings Roads, drainage & bridge network Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Water Sewerage
Capital expenditure ratio (times) Miscellaneous Community equity Total assets Total liabilities
Key metrics
Asset sustainability ratio (%) -% -% -% 200.8% 22.8% 22.1% 21.4% 20.8% 20.2% 19.6% 19.1% 30.9% -% 53.4% 37.8%
Asset renewal funding ratio (%) -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -%
Depreciation as a percentage of closing written down value of property, plant & equipment
-% (%) 5.5% 5.6% 4.2% 8.9% 9.9% 11.1% 12.5% 14.4% 16.8% 20.1% 13.6% 5.5% 7.9% 11.7%
Capital expenditure ratio (times) - - - 6.7x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.3x - 1.8 0.9
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Sewerage na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
Miscellaneous na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
Average useful life of depreciable assets na 18.1 17.8 23.5 11.3 10.1 9.0 8.0 6.9 5.9 5.0 7.3 18.1 14.4 10.5
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Capital expenditure—by asset class ($'000) Capital expenditure—by asset type ($'000) Closing book value of PP&E—by asset class ($'000)
1,600 1,600 6,000
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Miscellaneous - - - - - - - - - - - - na na na
Intangible - - - - - - - - - - - - na na na
Total closing book value - 4,222 3,998 5,274 4,936 4,583 4,216 3,835 3,439 3,029 2,605 2,381 na -0.0% -5.6%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Net debt position - 7,695 8,317 9,432 9,092 8,726 8,336 7,921 7,480 7,014 6,523 6,068 na 1.6% -2.3%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Forecasted debt repayments ($'000) Total debt to operating revenue & community equity (times) Total debt per capita & rateable property ($)
2.5x 350
500
2.0x
400 300
1.5x
300 250
1.0x
-
100 150
-0.5x
- 100
-1.0x
(100) -1.5x 50
(200) -2.0x -
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Scheduled principal repayments Additional principal repayments Interest repayments Total debt to operating revenue (times) Total debt to community equity (times) Total debt per capita ($) Total debt per rateable property ($)
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Time period for the chart from the start of the forecast 10 years
12.0
Cash expense cover (months)
10.0
Cash cycle by cash segments ($'000)
5,000 8.0
6.0
4,000 4.0
2.0
-
3,000
(2.0)
(4.0)
2,000 Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
1,000
10.0x
(1,000)
8.0x
6.0x
(2,000)
4.0x
(3,000) 2.0x
Jul-19B
Jan-20B
May-20B
Jul-20F
Sep-20F
Nov-20F
Jan-21F
Mar-21F
May-21F
Jul-21F
Sep-21F
Nov-21F
Jan-22F
Mar-22F
May-22F
Jul-22F
Sep-22F
Nov-22F
Jan-23F
Mar-23F
May-23F
Jul-23F
Sep-23F
Nov-23F
Jan-24F
Mar-24F
May-24F
Jul-24F
Sep-24F
Nov-24F
Jan-25F
Mar-25F
May-25F
Jul-25F
Sep-25F
Nov-25F
Jan-26F
Mar-26F
May-26F
Jul-26F
Sep-26F
Nov-26F
Jan-27F
Mar-27F
May-27F
Jul-27F
Sep-27F
Nov-27F
Jan-28F
Mar-28F
May-28F
Jul-28F
Sep-28F
Nov-28F
Jan-29F
Mar-29F
May-29F
Sep-19B
Nov-19B
Mar-20B
-
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Cash cover Externally restricted Internally restricted Long-term surplus Short-term surplus
Working capital ratio (times) QTC—lower bound QTC—upper bound
Overdraft Cash cover (unfunded) Cash balance Net cash balance Approved working capital facility limit
Closing balance of cash and cash equivalents ($'000) Annual unrestricted cash balance range (high, median, low) Closing cash balance and median annual cash balance
4,000 5,000 4,000
3,500
4,000 3,500
3,000 3,000
2,500 3,000 2,500
2,000 2,000
1,500 2,000
1,500
1,000 1,000
1,000
500 500
- - -
(500) (500)
(1,000)
(1,000) (1,000)
(1,500) (2,000) (1,500)
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F Jun-18A Jun-19A Jun-20B Jun-21F Jun-22F Jun-23F Jun-24F Jun-25F Jun-26F Jun-27F Jun-28F Jun-29F
Externally restricted Internally restricted Unrestricted Cash and cash equivalents—closing balance Cash and cash equivalents—median balance
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Liquidity metrics
Cash and cash equivalents—closing balance - 664 140 (874) (428) 51 560 1,098 1,668 2,271 2,907 3,512 na -3.4% 18.1%
Cash and cash equivalents—median balance - - 697 653 (346) 115 609 1,133 1,687 2,273 2,901 3,545 na na na
Cash expense cover (months) - 1.4 0.5 (2.8) (1.3) 0.2 1.7 3.2 4.8 6.4 8.0 9.5 1.4 (0.4) 3.0
Working capital ratio (times) - 0.5x 1.6x 0.3x 0.5x 1.4x 3.0x 4.7x 6.5x 8.4x 10.4x 12.2x 0.5x 1.4x 4.9x
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Income
Revenue
Operating revenue
General rates - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Separate rates - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Levies - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Water consumption, rental and sundries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sewerage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sewerage trade waste - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Waste management - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Garbage charges - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other rates, levies and charges - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Less: discounts - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Less: pensioner remissions - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net rates, levies and charges - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Capital revenue
Government subsidies and grants—capital - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Donations—capital - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Contributions—capital - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other capital contributions - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grants, subsidies, contributions and donations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total revenue - - - - 6,539 4,503 4,603 4,689 4,794 4,913 5,034 5,158 5,285 5,416 5,550
Capital income
Profit/(loss) on disposal of property, plant & equipment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Profit/(loss) on sale of joint ventures & associates - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Profit/(loss) on sale of controlled entities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Profit/(loss) on sale of other investments - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Profit/(loss) on sale of investment property - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Revaluation up of property, plant & equipment reversing previous revaluation down - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Revaluation of investment property - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Revaluation up of joint ventures & associates - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Revaluation up of controlled entities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other capital income - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total capital income - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total income - - - - 6,539 4,503 4,603 4,689 4,794 4,913 5,034 5,158 5,285 5,416 5,550
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Expenses
Operating expenses
Total staff wages and salaries - - - - 461 567 578 590 602 614 626 639 651 664 678
Councillors' remuneration - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Employee provision expense - - - - - 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Other employee related expenses - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Less: capitalised employee expenses - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Employee benefits - - - - 461 569 580 592 604 616 628 641 653 666 680
M&S—sales contract & recoverable works - - - - 714 563 576 589 601 615 628 642 656 671 685
M&S—administration supplies - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
M&S—audit services - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
M&S—communication & IT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
M&S—consultants - - - - 520 205 209 214 218 223 228 233 238 243 249
M&S—contractors - - - - 2,184 1,352 1,381 1,412 1,443 1,474 1,507 1,540 1,574 1,609 1,644
M&S—electricity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
M&S—council maintenance - - - - 121 83 85 86 88 90 92 94 96 99 101
M&S—travel - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
M&S—other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Materials and services - - - - 3,539 2,202 2,251 2,300 2,351 2,403 2,455 2,509 2,565 2,621 2,679
Finance costs charged by QTC and General - - - - 396 415 419 424 429 436 441 447 453 462 468
Interest paid on overdraft - - - - - - - 15 - - - - - - -
Bank charges - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest on finance leases - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other finance costs - - - - - - (1) (7) (1) - - - - - -
Finance costs - - - - 396 415 418 432 428 436 441 447 453 462 468
Land improvements - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Buildings - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Plant & equipment - - - - - 224 224 438 453 467 481 495 510 524 324
Furniture & fittings - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Roads, drainage & bridge network - - - - 233 - - - - - - - - - -
Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sewerage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Amortisation of intangible assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Depreciation and amortisation - - - - 233 224 224 438 453 467 481 495 510 524 324
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Capital expenses
Loss on impairment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Restoration & rehabilitation provision expense - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Revaluation decrement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other capital expenses - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total capital expenses - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total expenses - - - - 6,169 4,290 4,372 4,681 4,774 4,881 4,986 5,094 5,205 5,320 5,220
Tax equivalents
Total comprehensive income for the year - - - - 370 214 231 8 20 33 48 64 80 96 330
Operating result
Operating revenue - - - - 6,539 4,503 4,603 4,689 4,794 4,913 5,034 5,158 5,285 5,416 5,550
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Operating expenses - - - - 6,169 4,290 4,372 4,681 4,774 4,881 4,986 5,094 5,205 5,320 5,220
Operating result - - - - 370 214 231 8 20 33 48 64 80 96 330
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Assets
Current assets
Internally restricted component - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Externally restricted component - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unrestricted component - - - - 664 140 - - 51 560 1,098 1,668 2,271 2,907 3,512
Cash and cash equivalents - - - - 664 140 - - 51 560 1,098 1,668 2,271 2,907 3,512
General trade and other receivables - - - - 537 368 377 385 394 401 411 420 430 438 449
Internal loans outstanding - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Trade and other receivables - - - - 537 368 377 385 394 401 411 420 430 438 449
Total current assets - - - - 1,201 508 377 385 445 961 1,510 2,089 2,700 3,345 3,961
Non-current assets
Land held for development for sale - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Inventories - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Land - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Land improvements - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Buildings - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Plant & equipment - - - - 4,222 3,998 5,274 4,936 4,583 4,216 3,835 3,439 3,029 2,605 2,381
Furniture & fittings - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Roads, drainage & bridge network - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sewerage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Work in progress - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Property, plant & equipment - - - - 4,222 3,998 5,274 4,936 4,583 4,216 3,835 3,439 3,029 2,605 2,381
Intangible assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other non-current assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other non-current assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total non-current assets - - - - 4,222 3,998 5,274 4,936 4,583 4,216 3,835 3,439 3,029 2,605 2,381
Total assets - - - - 5,423 4,505 5,651 5,321 5,028 5,177 5,345 5,528 5,730 5,950 6,342
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Overdraft - - - - - - 874 428 - - - - - - -
Employee payables - - - - 37 46 48 48 49 50 51 52 54 54 56
Other payables - - - - 1,429 253 259 265 270 276 282 289 295 301 308
Trade and other payables - - - - 1,466 299 306 313 320 326 334 341 349 355 364
Loans - - - - 980 (101) (107) (112) (119) (124) (130) (136) (144) (150) (158)
Finance leases - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Borrowings - - - - 980 (101) (107) (112) (119) (124) (130) (136) (144) (150) (158)
Employee - - - - 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67
Restoration & rehabilitation - - - - 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51
Restructuring - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Provisions - - - - 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Total current liabilities - - - - 2,564 316 1,191 747 319 320 322 323 322 323 324
Non-current liabilities
Trade and other payables - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Loans - - - - 7,379 8,558 8,665 8,777 8,895 9,019 9,149 9,285 9,429 9,580 9,738
Finance leases - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Borrowings - - - - 7,379 8,558 8,665 8,777 8,895 9,019 9,149 9,285 9,429 9,580 9,738
Employee - - - - 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27
Restoration & rehabilitation - - - - 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138
Restructuring - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Provisions - - - - 3,145 3,147 3,149 3,151 3,153 3,155 3,157 3,159 3,161 3,163 3,165
Total non-current liabilities - - - - 10,524 11,705 11,814 11,928 12,048 12,174 12,306 12,444 12,590 12,743 12,903
Total liabilities - - - - 13,088 12,021 13,005 12,674 12,368 12,494 12,628 12,767 12,913 13,066 13,227
Net community assets - - - - (7,665) (7,515) (7,354) (7,354) (7,340) (7,317) (7,283) (7,239) (7,183) (7,115) (6,884)
Community equity
Total community equity - - - - (7,665) (7,515) (7,354) (7,354) (7,340) (7,317) (7,283) (7,239) (7,183) (7,115) (6,884)
Reconciliation
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Receipts from customers - - - - - 4,659 4,579 4,681 4,784 4,890 4,996 5,107 5,219 5,335 5,450
Payments to suppliers and employees - - - - - (4,816) (3,721) (3,802) (3,885) (3,970) (4,054) (4,143) (4,233) (4,325) (4,417)
Payments for land held as inventory - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Proceeds from sale of land held as inventory - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dividend received - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest received - - - - - 14 14 (15) 2 15 29 42 57 73 89
Rental income - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Non-capital grants and contributions - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Borrowing costs - - - - - (415) (419) (424) (429) (436) (441) (447) (453) (462) (468)
Tax equivalents paid to General - - - - - (64) (69) (0) (6) (10) (14) (19) (24) (29) (99)
Dividend paid to General - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Payment of provision - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other cash flows from operating activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net cash inflow from operating activities - - - - - (622) 385 439 467 490 515 540 566 592 555
Payments for property, plant and equipment - - - - - - (1,500) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100)
Payments for intangible assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net movement in loans and advances - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grants, subsidies, contributions and donations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other cash flows from investing activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net cash inflow from investing activities - - - - - - (1,500) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100)
Net cash inflow from financing activities - - - - - 98 101 107 112 119 124 130 136 144 150
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Net increase in cash and cash equivalent held - - - - - (524) (1,013) 446 479 509 539 570 602 636 605
Opening cash and cash equivalents - - - - - 664 140 (874) (428) 51 560 1,098 1,668 2,271 2,907
Closing cash and cash equivalents - - - - 664 140 (874) (428) 51 560 1,098 1,668 2,271 2,907 3,512
Reconciliation
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios
Print Summary
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Opening balance - - - - - - - - - -
Net result na na na na na na na na na na
Increase in asset revaluation surplus - - - - - - - - - -
Internal payments made na na na na na na na na na na
Closing balance - - - - - - - - - - -
Retained surplus
Opening balance (7,665) (7,515) (7,354) (7,354) (7,340) (7,317) (7,283) (7,239) (7,183) (7,115)
Net result 214 231 8 20 33 48 64 80 96 330
Increase in asset revaluation surplus na na na na na na na na na na
Internal payments made (64) (70) (7) (7) (10) (14) (19) (24) (29) (99)
Closing balance (7,665) (7,515) (7,354) (7,354) (7,340) (7,317) (7,283) (7,239) (7,183) (7,115) (6,884)
Total
Opening balance (7,665) (7,515) (7,354) (7,354) (7,340) (7,317) (7,283) (7,239) (7,183) (7,115)
Net result 214 231 8 20 33 48 64 80 96 330
Increase in asset revaluation surplus - - - - - - - - - -
Internal payments made (64) (70) (7) (7) (10) (14) (19) (24) (29) (99)
Closing balance (7,665) (7,515) (7,354) (7,354) (7,340) (7,317) (7,283) (7,239) (7,183) (7,115) (6,884)
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Selected Metrics
Selected Metrics
[—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound [—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound [—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound
[—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound [—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Selected Metrics
[—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound [—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound [—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound
[—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound [—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound [—] DILGP / QTC—upper bound DILGP / QTC—lower bound
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Selected Metrics
Selected metrics
1 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
2 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
3 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
4 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
5 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
6 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
7 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
8 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
9 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
10 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
11 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
12 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Selected Metrics
All Metrics
R1.1 Operating surplus ratio na na na na 5.7% 4.7% 5.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.7% 1.0% 1.2% 1.5% 1.8% 5.9%
R1.2 Net financial liabilities ratio na na na na 181.8% 255.7% 274.4% 262.1% 248.7% 234.7% 220.9% 207.0% 193.2% 179.5% 167.0%
R1.3 Asset sustainability ratio na na na na -% -% 200.8% 22.8% 22.1% 21.4% 20.8% 20.2% 19.6% 19.1% 30.9%
R2.1 Council controlled revenue ratio na na na na 20.7% 33.8% 33.8% 33.9% 33.8% 33.8% 33.7% 33.6% 33.5% 33.4% 33.3%
R2.2 Cash expense cover ratio na na na na 1.44 0.46 -2.81 -1.35 0.16 1.69 3.24 4.82 6.42 8.05 9.52
R2.3 Total debt service cover ratio na na na na 2.5x 0.6x 2.8x 0.7x 1.2x 2.9x 3.1x 3.2x 3.3x 3.4x 3.5x
R2.4 Capital expenditure ratio na na na na na na 6.7x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x 0.3x
R2.5 Average useful life of depreciable assets na na na na 18.14 17.84 23.54 11.26 10.12 9.03 7.97 6.94 5.94 4.97 7.35
R3.1 Growth in rateable properties na -5.0% -% 0.5% -% 0.5% 0.1% 0.3% 1.0% 1.3% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4%
R3.3 Growth in FTE numbers na 6.3% 1.7% -% 6.1% 0.3% 0.4% -% 0.6% -% 0.6% -% -% 0.4% -%
R3.4 Growth in EBA agreements -% -% -% -% -% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Selected Metrics
R3.8 Change in other operating revenue na na na na na -31.1% 2.2% 1.9% 2.2% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
R3.9 Change in employee benefits na na na na na 23.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Change in materials and services not used for sales and recoverable
R3.10 na na na na na -42.0% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2%
works
R3.11 Change in total materials and services na na na na na -37.8% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2%
R3.12 Change in depreciation & amortisation expenses na na na na na -3.7% -% 95.6% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 3.0% 2.9% 2.8% -38.2%
R3.13 Change in other operating expenses na na na na na -33.2% 1.7% 2.6% 1.2% 2.1% 1.9% 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% 1.9%
R3.14 Change in total operating revenue na na na na na -31.1% 2.2% 1.9% 2.2% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
R3.15 Change in total operating expenses na na na na na -30.5% 1.9% 7.1% 2.0% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% -1.9%
R3.16 Change in operating result na na na na na -42.2% 7.9% -96.6% 156.5% 60.1% 47.8% 31.9% 25.7% 20.1% 243.3%
R3.17 Change in selected cash closing balance na na na na na -79.0% -726.1% -51.1% -111.9% 1,000.4% 96.2% 51.9% 36.1% 28.0% 20.8%
R3.18 Cash expense cover ratio—excluding externally restricted na na na na 1.44 0.46 - - 0.16 1.69 3.24 4.82 6.42 8.05 9.52
R3.19 Cash expense cover ratio—excluding externally & internally restricted na na na na 1.44 0.46 - - 0.16 1.69 3.24 4.82 6.42 8.05 9.52
R3.20 Alternative minimum liquidity measure na na na na na 473 980 427 441 454 468 482 497 512 527
R3.21 Alternative minimum liquidity—months na na na na na 1.55 3.15 1.35 1.36 1.37 1.38 1.39 1.41 1.42 1.43
R3.22 Gross interest expense as a portion of average term debt na na na na na 4.9% 4.7% 4.7% 4.8% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9%
R3.23 Interest revenue as a portion of average cash na na na na na 3.5% -3.9% -% -1.1% 5.0% 3.4% 3.1% 2.9% 2.8% 2.8%
R3.27 Calculated creditor days na na na na 96.57 30.00 30.00 30.05 30.01 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
R3.28 Calculated debtor days na na na na 29.97 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Selected Metrics
R4.1 Gross capital expenditure - - - - - - 1,500 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
R4.2 Net capital expenditure - - - - - - 1,500 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
R4.7 Average useful life—plant & equipment na na na na na 17.84 23.54 11.26 10.12 9.03 7.97 6.94 5.94 4.97 7.35
R5.1 Relative operating growth rate na na na na na -0.7% 0.3% -5.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 4.4%
R5.3 Operating efficiency ratio na na na na 106.0% 105.0% 105.3% 100.2% 100.4% 100.7% 101.0% 101.2% 101.5% 101.8% 106.3%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Selected Metrics
R6.1 Interest cover ratio na na na na 2.5x 2.1x 2.1x 2.0x 2.1x 2.1x 2.2x 2.3x 2.3x 2.3x 2.4x
R6.2 Leverage ratio na na na na 117.7% 184.7% 185.9% 184.8% 182.0% 169.7% 157.3% 145.0% 132.7% 120.4% 109.3%
R6.3 Self generated revenue ratio na na na na 106.0% 105.0% 105.3% 100.2% 100.4% 100.7% 101.0% 101.2% 101.5% 101.8% 106.3%
Operating grants, subsidies, contributions & donations as a
R6.4 na na na na -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -%
percentage of total operating revenue
Contract and recoverable works as a percentage of total operating
R6.5 na na na na -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -%
revenue
R6.6 Other operating revenue as a percentage of total operating revenue na na na na 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
R6.7 Total employee benefits as a percentage of total operating expenses na na na na 7.5% 13.3% 13.3% 12.6% 12.6% 12.6% 12.6% 12.6% 12.6% 12.5% 13.0%
Total materials and services as a percentage of total operating
R6.8 na na na na 57.4% 51.3% 51.5% 49.1% 49.2% 49.2% 49.2% 49.3% 49.3% 49.3% 51.3%
expenses
Total depreciation & amortisation as a percentage of total operating
R6.9 na na na na 3.8% 5.2% 5.1% 9.4% 9.5% 9.6% 9.7% 9.7% 9.8% 9.9% 6.2%
expenses
R6.10 Other operating expenses as a percentage of total operating expenses na na na na 31.4% 30.2% 30.1% 28.9% 28.6% 28.6% 28.5% 28.4% 28.4% 28.3% 29.4%
R6.11 Net operating cash flow as a percentage of net capital expenditure na na na na na na 25.7% 439.4% 466.6% 490.3% 515.0% 540.2% 566.0% 591.7% 555.0%
Liquidity indicators
R7.1 Working capital ratio na na na na 0.5x 1.6x 0.3x 0.5x 1.4x 3.0x 4.7x 6.5x 8.4x 10.4x 12.2x
R8.2 Net margin na na na na 5.7% 4.7% 5.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.7% 1.0% 1.2% 1.5% 1.8% 5.9%
New capital expenditure as a percentage of opening written down
R8.3 na na na na na -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -% -%
value of property, plant & equipment
R8.4 Change in community equity excluding asset revaluation surplus na na na na na -2.0% -2.1% -0.0% -0.2% -0.3% -0.5% -0.6% -0.8% -0.9% -3.2%
Control Panel
Select Scenario Whole of Council or Business Units? Select Business Units Normalise Results Print
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Whole of Council General Saleyards Use median cash balance for ratios Print All
Selected Business Units Airport [Inactive BU] 5 Normalise for selected grant program
Selected Metrics