Professional Documents
Culture Documents
● Industrial revolution
particular life experiences
○ What is industrial revolution
■ Intersection of biography (individual experience) and history (social
a time of technological, economic, and social change
structural force)
■ change all around, different future>possible
■ terrible lesson and a magnificent one
● Marx
● Comte
○ Base and superstructure
○ sociology as science
All social patterns and relations stem from economic system(BASE)
■ wanted social science to be as exact as physics
includes:
■ a hierarchy of the sciences
■ two antagonistic classes (bourgeoise and proletariat)
■ essential, envisioned sociology as a crisis science
■ system of production
● Sewell
■ labor
○ casual structures
■ resources
■ social scientists see their task as rising above the contingency and
■ technologies
messiness of everyday life to find the lawful regularities that govern the
○ Superstructure is everything else (ideas, culture, politics)
whole
■ ideas grow out of mode of production
■ but instead temporality is lumpy, uneven, unpredictable, and discontinuous
■ completely misrepresent social life
■ underlying causal structures change according to the context
○ Bourgeoisie and proletariat
■ argues in favor of causal heterogeneity, historical contextualization and
■ capitalists: those who own the means of production
chronology
■ bourgeoisie: revolutionary, but now have upper hand
○ Three temporalities
■ proletariat: those who do not own the means of production
Teleological temporality
○ False consciousness
what happens today can be explained by the past, use present event to predict future
■ Workers misunderstand their position in the social/economic system
○ Experimental temporality
(individualistic bias)
freezing history
■ but with true consciousness, people can achieve agency
○ Eventful temporality
■ the communists do not form a separate party opposed to the other
■ prioritises events as crucial inflection point
working-class parties, instead they are revolutionary vanguard
○ generalized trust question
○ Philosophy of history
generally speaking would you say that most people can be trusted or need to be careful
-proletariat would unite and create change through revolution, overthrow
people in different country interpret questions in different ways
bourgeoisie and take political power
● Dubois
-resulting society: eliminate private property
contributions on:
- instead: from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs
○ objectivity
-but no matter how good our understandings are/ how much we have -succeeded in
○ subjectivity
cultivating ourselves as agents, course of history will not be changed by it
○ intervention
● Bourdieu
● Sociological imagination
○ challenge common sense
○ Mills
never taking a problem at face value
Study human society
but also seeing problems are a problem and so there is a historic genesis of problems
■ make the familiar strange
■ question habits or customs that seem natural
■ use sociological imagination: help us connect our personal experiences to
society at large and to historical forces, especially social institutions
■ seeing patterns and connections between personal experience and social
structures
Social Transformations, Agency, and Action ■ agency and structure presuppose each other
■ structures constrain but also enable human agency
● Integrating agency and structure ■ structure must be regarded as a process, (because it is changeable),
○ social structure, insight from sociological imagination not as a steady state
● agency
■ behaviors happens within larger framework, a social context ○ What is agency?
■ all in same situation, interconnected
■ individuals embedded within social networks different forms of agency depending on situational circumstances
○ what is sociology?
work on different temporal landscapes
■ study of dynamic relationship between individual agency and social
structure
type of analytical temporal scope characteristics
agency scope
■ their joint influence on human behavior and social life
existential all all temporla horizons fundamental element of free
■ defined more by its perspective (sociological imagination in all its varieties) circumstances will
than a particular subject matter
pragmatic novel situation knife’s edge present ability to innovate when
■ Individualism moment routines break down
■ strongly rooted in the enlightenment identity routine situationally-oriented capacity to act within socially
■ social problem caused by flaws in individual character (poor cuz X situation goal attainment prescribed role expectations
work hard enough)
life course life pathways long-range future life decision made at turning
■ society=individual people
plans points and transitions
■ ignore differences between individuals and social relationships,
social forces
○
■ in terms of what goes on inside people’s head
one underpins the other
■ Social structures
■ 治標不治本
has palliative effects
Education VS marriage
■ allow people to be satisfied with their situations and society as a whole
education > marriage, while recognize drawbacks of late marriage
Career goal + sustained effort + positive thinking + resistance to temptation = Urbanization and ecologies
bright future
○ Too much individual agency
○ Reading (business people cope with resilience) level of personal control encourage agentic activities against immutable
■ premises conditions
■ seeking to respond to risk society > make space for resilience in the self-recrimination and self-blame occur when activities unable to alter these
■ people live among crises, accumulate crisis experience>previous crisis more personal control, less depression
exp. brought on to bear on subsequent ones too much personal control, more depression
■ small business owner because too much mastery forget abt social structure you live in, X blame the
■ adapt>come up from nothing, (as long as healthy and safe>can get ■ entrepreneurs learn and build resilience in face of crisis
through and come up with ways that can survive ■ BUT optimism can be damaged if unfounded >> ignoring social structures
■ Hopefulness: unrealistically optimistic
■ reinforceing heroic mythologies about entrepreneurial agency
■ Hopeful people are priviledged people
■ generialized expectations: sense of optimism about life, general attitudes
towards the future
■ individuals think their life will turn out well
■ comparative life expectations: future is conceived ~ observed conditions
■ compared to one’s own life now or in the past
■ compared to the lives of relevant others (family friends)
■ Findings
■ High SES youth: high expectations for success, but no strong sense be
more successful than their parents
■ Lower SES youth: develop a range of future expectations (general and
comparative), but not optimistic about the future
■ beneficial to be higher on generalized or comparative expectations
■ But generalized expectations matter more
■ Reproduce inequality across generations or resource to promote
resilience?
■ effects of life course expectations: shared equally across all levels of
socioeconomic disadvantage
■ generalized expectations: reproduce inequality across generations
■ But, because it is also beneficial among disadvantaged youth, represents the
type of resource that can facilitate resilience and life course achievement
■ Increase future expectations>decrease poverty?
■ aspirations gaps: over life course, poverty + deprivation>limit individual’s goals,
will not aspire to their full potential
■ capacity to aspire: ability emerge and responds to the particular inequalities
facing individuals>>set of beliefs individual holds about her future+reflection of
individual’s capacity to actualize these aspirations
■ poverty trap: external constraints>poor more susceptible to aspirations failure
■ more hopeful>>more aspire>>do better in life ■ collective efficacy=social cohesion among neighbors+willingness to intervene
low aspire>>low effort>>low motivation>>reinforce low aspire on behalf of the common good, linked to reduced violence>>linked to
resources~aspiration structural contexts
● how we think through social resilience ■ Job for a neighborhood=for everyone to feel safe
○ resilience in policy closely linked with neoliberal agendas ○ have collective efficacy>>less violence>>people help each other
○ resilience tends to be framed in terms of self-sufficiency and self-reliance
○ resilience tied up with agendas of abandonment and responsibilisation of citizens
● how people understand themselves X material constraints
lack resilience>>personal problem, not social problem
but feel like have resilience>>not enough
Solution: Community or social resilience
○ collective ability of a social group: sustain well-being when facing challenges/ cope
with/recover from stresses
○ engage with ordinary and everyday modes of vulnerability + extraordinary events and
unfolding processes
○ resilience not only survival but central to successful societies
○ constantly manage stigma and negotiate strategies of worth (rebuild their resilience)
e.g. turn to law to manage assaults on their worth
○ belief system: provide collective cultural frameworks:
○ make sense of world around them
○ reaffirm own worth in light of disadvantage
○ preserve their equanimity(calmness) even facing persistent challenges
● social support and survival (Klinenberg)
○ survive or not depends on access to social support
○ people at risk>>least want/accept support from government, isolated marginalised
people (social and spatial division)
○ But it is the condition they living make them difficult to lead to govt. they think outside
is dangerous, X go out
○ build forms of insecurity
○ can do things as a group (norms of connection and framework of social support)
○ Klinenberg’s model
■ social morphology + political economy of vulnerability >> determines disaster
damage
■ role of the state in determining this vulnerability at both structural and conjunctural
levels
■ political officials + journalist ignore vulnerability of political economy + the role of the
state in reconstructing disasters they produce
● Ecologies of resilience
○ Collective efficacy
■ ecological approach: social + organizational characteristics of neighborhoods
explain variations in crime rates, X only attributable to aggregated demographic
characteristics of individuals
Businesses and Globalization kernel of subdiscipline in analysing relations between societies and
What is nature? environments
3 meanings: ■ Fix it by changing industrialization
■ develop new technologies that are more intelligent than older
■ essential quality and character of something
ones+benefit the environment
■ inherent force which directs either the world or human being or both
■ concept of ecological modernization includes economizing ecology by
■ material world itself: include human/ not include human
placing economic value on the third force of production: nature
○ Nature and culture (levi-strauss)
■ only can prevail when dismantle capitalism
■ premise: man=biological being+social individual
■ different view of problem of ecological crisis
■ problem: how tease out influences of nature(biology) and culture(sociology)
For ecological modernization theorists:
■ preferred solution: suppose everything universal in man~natural
■ culprit: industrialism
order+characterized by spontaneity+everything subject to a
■ solution: reforming industrialism (go further into industrialism,
norm=cultural+relative+particular
towards hyper- or superindustrialization)
○ against nature
■ For eco-Marxists:
natural order alone cannot dictate which specific norms to follow cuz many orders in
culprit: capitalism
nature
■ solution: abolishing capitalism
nature many variety as culture
■ capitalism=particular relationship between humans and natural
norms form nature>converge mroe convincingly than those freely invented by art as
environment
illusory
■ interested in analyzing relationship between dynamics of
○ Connections between environment and people
capitalism and environmental degradation
environmental sociology:
■ treadmill of production: image of society running in place
■ examine how human interact with nonhuman beings+entities+processes on
without moving forward
Earth
■ opposite to ecological modernization, different political
■ how these relationship shape mutual existence+survival+possibilities for
implications to neo-malthusianism
flourishing
■ Goldstein: businesses
● human ingenuity can/X prevail
■ planetary improvement: cleantech arc>monthly savings (energy bills,
○ cannot prevail
waste disposal fees)>environmental savings (reduce
■ Malthusianism
CO2)>environmental transformation (reduce dependence on fossil
overarching concern: limits
fuels)>>save planet
■ population+economic growth>>ultimately checked by absolute limits
■ attract investors: successful, profitable business
on resources
■ but there are important ways that people involve. in green economy
■ grew in popularity (1940s-60s): evidence>population growth (+related
earnestly believe in what they are doing
environmental stress)>>irrversible environmental damage
■ Core contradiction: professionals create+commercializing disruptive
■ new ecological paradigm
tech.>radically transform our lives VS when came to actual find
although inventiveness of humans and powers derived may seem for a while to
commercially viable projects, considerations of anything disruptive
extend carrying capactity linits, ecological laws cannot be repealed
quickly gave way to assessments of which tech. demonstrate potential
○ can prevail
to provide incremental gains in already established markets
■ ecological modernization theory
■ non-disruptive disruptions: green spirit of capitalism: mobilize radical,
■ ecological modernization: social scientific interpretation of
anti-systemic critique of captialism>>provide moral legitimacy and
environmental reform processes as multiple scales in the contemporary
affective force>>make modern industrial economy less environmentally
world
destructive, still capitalism, just greener version
■ far less pessimistic compared to neo-malthusianism
■ Making an impact:
■ hostile to new ecological paradigm
impact as capital↔impact-beyond capital
■ environmental sociology benefit from further emancipation from
can’t define impact expect in negative
dominance of biocological schemes and models>form socioecological
focus on(often exclusive) big business(solve planetary problem) Social Control and the Construction of Deviance
elaborate themselves as business people
● Norms
Conclusion:
○ What is a norm?
entrepreneurialism Xcategorically dismissed by critics of captialism, instead
■ Conducting rules that specify appropriate behaviour in a range of social
seen as shorthand for forms of creative labor that can and should be reclaimed
situations
and redirected
X reject green tech. because currently mobilized to proved incremental gains to ■ Learn through socialization
but need to question whether can afford (collectively socially environmentally) social process through which we internalize the values, beliefs, and norms of a
to place so much focus on developing solutions that are predicated upon the society
perseverance of very problems that need to be solved in the first place Deviance from norms is enforced through sanctions
pattern: belief in global warming decrease non-conformity to/violation of a set of cultural norm
–info about potential consequences of global warming threatens deeply held beliefs(world is Minor transgressions of norms
○ individuals overcome this threat by denying existence of global warming Violation of norms that codified into law; punish with fines; jail terms; or other
○ less dire messaging more effective for promoting public understanding of (not all crime are social deviant, not all deviance is crime
Convertible into+institutionalized
in form of:
Language use reasoning/ directives, directives, rare to
child contest, extend question/challenge parents,
negotiations general acceptance
Economic capital Money+property rights
○ What is intersectionality?
■ knowledge project that lies in its attentiveness to power relations and social
inequalities
■ critical insight that race, class, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, nation, ability, and
age operate not as unitary, mutually exclusive entities, but as reciprocally
constructing phenomena that in turn shape complex social inequalities
■ Three interdependent concerns
■ field of study situated within the power relations that it studies Inequality: Colonialism
■ analytical strategy that provides new angles of vision on social
phenomena ● Power and authority
■ critical praxis that informs social justice projects ○ What is power?
○ What is feminism? the ability to exercise one’s will over other
at social level: exercised through the state (political. system) and economy
the political, economic and social equality of the sexes
■ Types of power
■ gender structures social relations, power differentials by gender ■ What is state?
■ gendered division of labor (devalues work done in the home, economic human community that successfully claims the control of the
dependence of women, lack resources and power) legitimate use of physical force in a given territory
■ feminists propose solutions: resources, choice, respect ■ What is nation-state?
○ Intersectionality theory a state where most people also belong to the same nation (e.g. the
same ethnic group)
■ not only gender alone ■ What is hard power?
use of military or economic force to influence behavior
■ intersection of gender with race, class, ability, sexual orientation ■ What is soft power?
the use of cultural or ideological means to influence behaviors
■ some women more/less priviledged than other women ○ What is authority?
the legitimate/accepted use of power
■ feminism criticized for not always taking intersectionality into account ■ types of authority
■ traditional authority: accept the exercise of power because of
■ Class and race tradition
■ e.g. british monarchy
class important in explaining the persistence of racial inequality often shaped by race, class and gender
e.g. economic gap grow between rich and poor african american ■ charismatic authority: accept the exercise of power because of
personality of the leader
mm hai does not give enough attention to ongoing discrimination and racist ■ rational-legal authority: accept the exercise of power because of laws
beliefs or rules
■ e.g. bureaucracy (legal-rational organization or mode of administration that
it is race an class and other privileges that all interact to specify an individual’s governs with reference to rules and roles and emphasizes meritocracy(sucess
experiences because of ability)
● Configurations of empire
● Reading (becoming entrepreneurs) ○ What is empire?
■ denote/represent authority
○ premises ■ extended to denote Rome’s right to command ANYONE
■ intersectional approach to black women’s entrepreneurial activity ■ expansive militarized and multiethnic political organizations that
■ how intersecting oppressions often relegate minority women into the bottom significantly limit the sovereignty of the peoples and polities they conquer
of the labor queue, where economic stability is precarious and they are ■ matter of power rather than authority
over-represented in low-skill, low-status work ○ What is imperialism?
○ Unique challenges a strategy of political control over foreign lands that does not necessarily involve
■ limited access to startup capital conquest occupation and durable rule by outside invaders
■ lack of access to other entrepreneurs ○ What is colonialism?
■ still experience ghettoization(discriminalize) conquest of a foreign people followed by the creation of an organization controlled by
members of the conquering polity and suited to rule over the conquered territory’s
indigenous population