Professional Documents
Culture Documents
𝜃𝑉 2 𝜃𝑉ൗ
𝑒 𝑇
𝑇
f= 𝜃𝑉
2 f= Einstein function
ൗ
𝑒 𝑇 −1
• Drawbacks
Einstein model and experiment values at high temperatures agrees well
1. The model is applicable only to atomic crystals, and it does not accurately
reproduce the temperature dependence of CV ,v,m for molecular solids.
2. Imp- Einstein model assumed the 3N independent harmonic oscillators having
same frequency or isoenergetic. This may not be true. CO has different
vibrational frequencies for different modes.
3. Einstein model predicts that the heat capacity should demonstrate exponential
dependence at low temperature; however, experimentally the heat capacity
demonstrates T3 dependence.
These all drawbacks were taken care by Debye in his model
We can say that in Einstein model we are able to find out the range of the molar heat
capacity values and we noticed the molar heat capacity varies from 0 (low T) to 3R
(high T).
• The Debye theory of heat capacity
The normal frequencies of the crystal are not due to vibrations of single atoms but are due to
concerted harmonic motion of all the atoms. These lattice vibrations are not all
characterized by the same frequency.
Debye assumed the atomic crystal to have 3N normal vibrations, each having unique
frequency.
𝜃𝐷
𝑇
𝑇
3
𝑥4 𝑒 𝑥 This expression must be
𝐶𝑣 = 9𝑁𝑘 𝑥 2
𝑑𝑥 evaluated numerically,
𝜃𝐷 𝑒 −1
cannot be evaluated by
0
simple function.
Where,
ℎ𝑣 ℎ𝑣𝐷
𝑥= 𝜃𝐷 = Characteristic Debye temperature
𝐾𝑇 𝑘
Therefore, it is convenient to define the Debye function as
𝜃𝐷
𝑇
3
𝑻 𝑇 𝑥4 𝑒 𝑥
𝑫 =3 𝑥 2
𝑑𝑥
𝜽𝑫 𝜃𝐷 𝑒 −1
0
∞
3 4 π4 (After solving)
𝑻 𝑇 𝑥4 𝑒 𝑥 Standard integral =
𝑫 =3 𝑥 2
𝑑𝑥 15
𝜽𝑫 𝜃𝐷 𝑒 −1
0
2.
𝑇
𝐶𝑣 = 3𝑁𝑘𝐷
𝜃𝐷