Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Teachstone®
The
CLASS®
System
Birth
through
Secondary
What
is
the
CLASS®?
The
Classroom
Assessment
Scoring
System®
(CLASS)
was
developed
to
identify
observable
teacher-‐student1
interactions,
to
determine
which
interactions
are
effective
in
driving
better
developmental
and
academic
student
outcomes,
and
to
support
teachers
as
they
improve
their
teaching
practices.
The
CLASS
is
a
standardized
approach
that
can
be
used
to
drive
improved
teaching
in
birth
through
secondary
classrooms.
There
are
six
developmentally
aligned
versions,
each
based
on
theory
and
shown
to
be
reliable
and
valid
in
large-‐scale
empirical
studies.
● Infant
CLASS
● Toddler
CLASS
● Pre-‐K
CLASS
● K-‐3
CLASS
● Upper
Elementary
CLASS
● Secondary
CLASS
In
birth
through
secondary
programming,
“quality”
has
been
regulated
largely
through
easily
quantifiable
requirements
such
as
class
size,
student–teacher
ratio,
teacher
certificates
and
degrees23,
and
curriculum4,
yet
little
evidence
exists
that
these
program
attributes
lead
to
academic
gains
for
students.
Rather,
research
consistently
suggests
that
more
effective
teacher-‐student
interactions
improve
student
academic
achievement
and
social
skill
development
and
are
a
better
gauge
of
quality
than
widely
used
measures
to
date5.
1
The
use
of
the
term
“student”
is
used
throughout
this
document
to
refer
to
children
from
birth
2
Pianta,
R.
C.,
Howes,
C.,
Burchinal,
M.,
Clifford,
R.,
Early,
D,
et
al.,
“Features
of
pre-‐
Kindergarten
Programs,
Classrooms,
and
Teachers:
Do
they
predict
observed
classroom
quality
and
child-‐teacher
interactions?
Applied
Developmental
Science,
9:3,
pages
144-‐159.
For
elementary:
NICHD
ECCRN,
“The
relation
of
global
first
grade
classroom
environment
to
structural
classroom
features,
teacher,
and
Student
behaviors.”
3
Howes,
C.,
Burchinal,
M.,
Bryant,
D.,
Early,
D.,
Clifford,
R
et.
al.,
“Ready
to
learn?
Children’s
preschool
classrooms
serving
at-‐risk
pupils,”
Early
Childhood
Research
Quarterly,
23,
pages
51-‐68.
5
Mashburn,
A.,
Pianta,
R.C.,
Hamre,
B.K.,
Downer,
J.,
Barbarin,
O.,
Bryant,
D.,
Burchinal,
M.,
Clifford,
R.,
Early,
D.,
&
Howes,
C.,
“Measures
of
classroom
quality
in
pre-‐kindergarten
and
children’s
development
of
academic,
language,
and
social
skills.
Child
Development,
79,
pages
732-‐749.
1
Effective
interactions
between
teachers
and
students
are
essential
for
promoting
long-‐term
student
success.
The
CLASS
can
be
used
to
obtain
a
reliable,
valid
assessment
of
the
types
of
teacher-‐student
interactions
that
promote
positive
academic
and
social
outcomes6.
CLASS
observations
can
be
used
to
assess
and
support
improvement
in
these
interactions
in
ways
that
have
direct
impacts
on
children’s
development
and
learning.
Each
version
of
the
CLASS
is
structured
with
developmentally
appropriate
domains
and
dimensions.
Infant Toddler Pre-K
Positive Climate
Positive Climate
Emotional
Negative Climate
Support
Relational Climate
Behavioral Support
Negative Climate
Emotional and
Teacher Sensitivity
Regard for Student
Teacher Sensitivity Perspectives
Responsive Caregiving
Organization
Management
Classroom
Behavior Guidance Productivity
Facilitated Instructional
Exploration Learning Formats
Facilitation of
Engaged Support
Learning and
for Learning
Development Concept
Instructional
Development
Support
Emotional
Support
Support
Emotional
Organization
Behavior Behavior
Classroom
Classroom
Management Management
Behavior
Organization
Instructional
Content Content
Support
Support
Understanding Understanding
Concept
Instructional
6
LaParo,
K.,
Pianta.,
R.C.,
&
Stuhlman,
M,
“Classroom
Assessment
Scoring
System
(CLASS):
Findings from the Pre-‐K Year,” Elementary School Journal, 104:5, pages 409-‐426.
2
Initially
developed
for
use
in
pre-‐K
classrooms,
the
CLASS
has
since
been
expanded
for
use
in
classrooms
for
both
older
and
younger-‐aged
students.
The
domains
and
dimensions
shown
in
the
chart
above
[D&D
chart
of
all
age
levels]
are
based
on
developmental
and
educational
theory
identified
for
the
specific
age
levels
of
the
CLASS
through
extensive
research.
The
dimensions
were
derived
from:
a
review
of
constructs
assessed
in
classroom
observation
instruments
used
in
educational
research;
focus
groups;
and
extensive
pilot
studies7. Indicators
and
behavioral
markers
provide
specific,
developmentally
appropriate
examples
of
the
teacher
and
student
behaviors
that
further
describe
each
dimension
in
more
detail.
Throughout
the
age
levels,
from
infant
through
secondary,
CLASS
captures
consistent
elements
of
teachers’
interactive
behavior
and
designates
dimensions
measuring
teachers’
emotional
support
of
children,
including
behaviors
such
as
warmth,
positive
communication,
and
sensitivity
to
children’s
needs8,9;
teachers’
classroom
management,
including
the
ways
they
optimize
learning
opportunities
and
maintain
and
build
interest
in
learning;
and
teachers’
instructional
support,
promoting
students’
cognitive
and
language
development.
By
providing
a
common
way
to
describe
and
observe
effective
interactions
across
age
levels,
the
CLASS
tool
bridges
grade-‐to-‐grade
transitions
and
increases
consistency
and
coherence
in
a
framework
for
understanding
effective
teaching,
while
still
providing
a
context-‐specific
and
developmentally-‐responsive
metric
for
each
age
group10.
The
tool
can
also
be
used
to
measure
the
consistent
presence
of
effective
interactions
across
levels
and
grades,
accompanied
by
descriptions
and
examples
specifically
tailored
to
each
age
group
for
each
dimension.
Using
one
assessment
and
professional
development
system
to
support
all
age
levels
ensures
greater
alignment
and
continuity,
provides
a
common
language,
supports
common
standards
of
professionalism,
and
creates
a
shared
vision
of
effective
practice.
The
table
below
provides
domain
justifications
for
each
of
the
6
scales.
7
Pianta,
Hamre,
and
Mintz.
The
Classroom
Assessment
Scoring
System:
Secondary
Manual,
2012
8
(Matsumura,
Patthey-‐Chavez,
Valdes,
&Garnier,
2002;
NICHD
ECCRN,
in
press;
Whitebook
et al., 1989).
3
Infant
Research
and
statistical
analyses
support
the
use
of
one
domain,
Responsive
Caregiving,
and
four
dimensions,
for
the
infant
CLASS
measure,
as
it
is
largely
based
on
interactions
in
routine
care
activities
in
which
the
infant
is
fully
dependent
on
an
adult
(LaParo,
Hamre,
Pianta.
Classroom
Assessment
Scoring
System:
Infant
Manual
2011).
Evidence
indicates
that
the
effectiveness
of
teacher-‐student
interactions
within
this
domain
predicts
levels
of
child
learning
and
development.
The
infant
measure
focuses
more
on
verbal
and
physical
interactions
between
infants
and
teachers
and
less
on
classroom
management
than
other
age
level
versions
because
teachers’
degree
of
sensitivity
and
interactive
skills
are
more
influential
to
infant
development.
[from
Infant
Intro
PPT_v.1.1]
K-‐3
Research
revealed
that
K-‐3
classroom
interactions
fall
into
one
of
three
domains
with
ten
dimensions
(Pianta,
LaParo,
Hamre.
4
Upper
Research
revealed
the
same
three
domains
as
in
the
pre-‐K
and
Elementary
K-‐3
versions,
but
these
domains
are
divided
along
12
dimensions
(Pianta,
Hamre,
Mintz.
Classroom
Assessment
Scoring
System:
Upper
Elementary
Manual,
2012).
Upper
elementary
and
secondary
may
be
considered
“partner”
age
levels.
Nonetheless,
the
specific
behavioral
indicators
for
these
dimensions
may
manifest
themselves
in
different
ways
as
students
move
from
upper
elementary
school
to
secondary
school.
Why
Was
CLASS
Developed?
Discovering
Key
Predictors
of
Student
Success
Experts
in
education
have
long
understood
that
effective
teacher-‐student
interactions
produce
greater
academic
and
social
achievement
among
students.
Yet,
until
recently,
education
professionals
relied
on
theory-‐based
professional
development
supports,
such
as
training
on
developmental
theory
and
curriculum
implementation.
In
the
late
1990s,
regulations
for
federally
funded
education
programs
started
to
require
the
use
of
evidence-‐based
approaches.
As
such,
the
need
to
develop
evidence-‐based
program
supports
emerged.
For
the
first
time,
theory-‐based
program
supports
were
being
evaluated
to
determine
if
each
led
to
positive
child
outcomes.
Child
assessment
measures
and
curricula
were
largely
the
focus
of
these
examinations.
This
evidence-‐based
approach
led
to
greater
knowledge
of
what
students
needed
to
learn,
but
many
of
these
approaches
did
not
5
sufficiently
address
how
teachers
could
be
effective
in
supporting
learning
through
effective
interactions.
A
number
of
scientists,
informed
by
developmental
psychology
and
education
research,
were
interested
in
the
extent
to
which
teachers’
interactions
with
students
might
account
for
what
made
some
teachers
more
effective
than
others.
They
knew
that
interactions
between
students
and
adults
were
a
primary
mechanism
for
promoting
student
development
and
learning11
and
thus
began
observing
teachers’
actual
classroom
practices
and
behaviors
with
children.
This
research
focus
on
interactions
was
embedded
in
two
large-‐scale,
multi-‐year
studies
that
tracked
children’s
learning
and
development
as
a
consequence
of
their
experiences
at
home
and
in
child
care
and
school
settings.
The
first
and
largest
of
these
was
the
NICHD
Study
of
Early
Care
and
Youth
Development
(SECCYD)
that
tracked
children
and
their
experiences
from
birth
to
age
15.
The
second
was
an
11-‐
state
study
of
children’s
experiences
in
state-‐funded
pre-‐K,
the
largest
observational
study
of
its
kind,
conducted
with
support
from
the
Institute
for
Education
Sciences
(IES)
by
the
National
Center
for
Early
Development
and
Learning
(NCEDL).
Following
these
major
studies
was
a
line
of
intervention
research
funded
by
IES
through
the
National
Center
for
Research
on
Early
Childhood
Education
(NCRECE),
which
focused
on
professional
development
(coursework,
coaching)
to
improve
teacher-‐student
interactions.
Taken
together,
this
research
led
to
two
key
conclusions:
(1)
that
more
effective
teacher-‐student
interactions
produced
greater
social
and
academic
gains
over
time,
and
(2)
that
intentional
professional
development
can
improve
teacher-‐student
interactions.
Hundreds
of
subsequent
studies
have
further
validated
the
CLASS
as
a
tool
that
can
be
used
at
large
scale
to
reliably
observe
and
assess
teacher-‐student
interactions,
and
as
predictive
of
later
student
achievement
from
toddlerhood
to
high
school.
The
CLASS
dimensions
focus
on
interactions
between
and
among
teachers
and
students
in
classrooms;
scoring
for
the
dimensions
is
not
determined
by
the
presence
of
materials,
the
physical
environment
or
safety,
or
the
adoption
of
a
specific
curriculum.
A
strength
of
the
CLASS
is
that
it
is
content
neutral,
meaning
that
the
constructs
are
meaningful
across
diverse
learning
approaches.
In
the
CLASS,
the
focus
is
on
what
teachers
do
with
the
materials
they
have,
and
on
the
interactions
the
teachers
have
with
the
students.
The
CLASS
allows
education
professionals
to
objectively
measure
observable
behaviors
of
teachers,
or
teacher-‐
student
interactions,
regardless
of
adopted
curricular
approaches.
11
Greenberg,
Domitrovich,
&
Bumbarger,
2001;
Hamre
&
Pianta,
2007;
Morrison
&
Conner,
6
Publication
of
the
CLASS
was
groundbreaking
and
enabled
the
education
field
to
shift
program
requirements
from
easily
quantifiable
indicators
such
as
student–
teacher
ratio,
class
size,
and
teacher
credentials
and
degrees
to
observable
interactions
that
are
predictors
of
student
achievement.
For
the
first
time,
effective
teaching
practices
were
universally
measureable
with
evidence
that
these
metrics
led
to
positive
child
outcomes.
An
immediate
and
rapidly
spreading
demand
for
the
CLASS
resulted
in
the
strength
of
evidence
on
the
reliability
and
validity
of
this
observation
tool.
Research
studies
began
to
include
the
CLASS
as
a
standard
measure
of
teacher-‐student
interactions
and
program
quality.
Today,
CLASS
is
used
broadly
in
research,
accountability,
program
planning
and
evaluation,
and
professional
development
in
the
U.S.
and
across
the
globe.
Research
continues
on
the
CLASS,
with
studies
providing
further
support
to
the
validity
of
the
tool.
In
addition
to
having
strong
predictive
validity,
the
CLASS
creates
common
language
and
expectations
for
education
professionals
across
the
birth
through
secondary
settings.
This
allows
for
education
professionals
to
improve
their
interactions
with
students
even
as
they
move
across
age
or
grade
levels.
This
also
provides
administrators
with
a
common
metric
by
which
they
can
evaluate
teacher
effectiveness
across
all
age
and
grade
levels.
Why
Use
CLASS?
Supporting
Teacher
Effectiveness
Fundamental
to
the
CLASS
is
the
recognition
of
a
teacher’s
role
and
approach
in
maximizing
student
development
and
learning.
However,
improving
teachers’
impact
on
students
does
not
occur
without
a
system
of
support.
These
systems
need
to
be
intentional
in
providing
teachers
with
feedback
on
and
support
for
effective
ways
of
engaging
students.
Within
the
most
effective
professional
development
and
coaching
systems,
professionals
play
multiple
roles
and
have
specific
responsibilities.
Teachers,
administrators,
coaches,
and
reliable
observers
work
as
a
team,
using
the
CLASS
as
the
roadmap
for
discourse.
The
CLASS
provides
an
objective
measure
of
teacher
practice
that
guides
constructive
and
specific
feedback
on
effective
and
ineffective
teaching.
With
the
CLASS
as
the
foundation,
or
anchor,
of
a
broader
system
of
professional
development
supports,
teachers
learn
about
effective
teacher-‐child
interactions,
observers
measure
teacher
quality,
and
coaches
and
administrators
provide
targeted
feedback
to
help
teachers
improve.
● Teachers
develop
knowledge
by
learning
about
the
importance
of
interactions
within
the
CLASS
framework,
viewing
current
practice
within
a
CLASS
lens,
and
intentionally
planning
to
practice
effective
approaches
to
interactions.
● Administrators
support
teachers
by
using
CLASS
observational
data
to
inform
decisions
that
tailor
professional
development
supports
such
as
training
and
coaching
to
individual
teachers’
needs,
and
by
building
internal
capacity
for
sustainability
of
the
system.
7
● Coaches
support
teachers
in
developing
knowledge
and
readiness
to
change,
viewing
their
current
practice
through
the
CLASS
lens,
and
intentionally
planning
to
practice
effective
teacher-‐student
interactions.
● Reliable
Observers,
trained
by
Teachstone
and
its
affiliates,
provide
the
accurate
and
objective
assessments
of
teacher
practices
needed
to
inform
administrators
in
program
planning
and
coaches
in
supporting
teacher
improvement.
They
also
maintain
reliability
through
ongoing
professional
development
and
calibration.
Observing
and
measuring
teacher-‐student
interactions
with
the
CLASS
allows
coaches
to
help
teachers
learn
about
the
importance
of
interactions,
see
their
own
interactions,
and
improve
them.
How
does
the
CLASS
System
Work?
The
CLASS
system
for
fostering
effective
teacher-‐student
interaction
works
by
coupling
observation
data
with
professional
development.
It
combines
a
valid
observation
tool
to
measure
the
quality
of
teacher-‐student
interactions
with
proven-‐
effective
professional
development
supports
that
help
teachers
improve
their
classroom
interactions.
Scores
alone
are
only
one
piece
of
the
puzzle—data
gives
us
a
picture
of
the
classroom,
but
in
order
to
effect
change,
data
needs
to
be
attached
to
coaching
and
professional
development.
The
CLASS
system
is
about
more
than
raising
a
score
on
one
dimension
to
meet
program
requirements.
It
is
about
ensuring
that
every
child
has
access
to
teachers
who
offer
warm,
responsive,
and
cognitively
stimulating
classroom
experiences.
From
research,
we
know
that
interactions
matter
more
than
a
teacher’s
degree
or
length
of
experience,
or
the
number
of
toys
and
books
in
the
classroom.
It
is
teacher-‐
8
child
interactions
that
consistently
drive
learning
outcomes,
and
it
is
these
interactions
that
are
most
worthy
of
attention.
Improving
teacher
effectiveness
using
the
CLASS
system
begins
with
collecting
data
using
well-‐trained,
certified
observers.
Once
the
observation
data
has
been
collected,
the
data
must
be
used
to
consider
the
teacher’s
needs.
Coaches,
trained
on
the
CLASS,
support
teachers
by
examining
CLASS
scores,
determining
which
behaviors
a
teacher
should
exhibit
more
frequently
and
which
behaviors
should
be
extinguished
or
introduced.
The
CLASS
allows
coaches
to
make
data-‐driven
suggestions
about
a
teacher’s
professional
development
through
an
individualized
professional
development
plan.
The
coach
must
consider
how
to
support
9
● What
teachers
need
to
know:
knowledge
of
what
effective
interactions
are,
how
to
recognize
them,
and
why
they
are
important
to
students’
learning;
● What
teachers
need
to
see:
awareness
of
their
own
practice;
and
● What
teachers
need
to
do:
their
classroom
work—the
actual
practice
of
implementing
and
integrating
effective
behaviors.
Teachers
then
access
the
content,
often
using
a
blended
model
of
online
and
face-‐to-‐
face
learning.
By
combining
all
these
activities
across
observers,
coaches,
and
teachers,
the
CLASS
system
has
been
proven
to
impact
teaching
practices
that
drive
child
outcomes12.
Change
does
not
happen
overnight,
so
this
approach
is
a
cycle
rather
than
a
linear
process.
Taking
these
steps
to
enhance
what
coaches
and
administrators
are
already
doing
to
support
teachers
allows
for
incremental
change
over
time,
but
this
cyclical
approach
is
most
effective
when
it
recurs
frequently.
Observing
with
the
CLASS
The
CLASS
provides
a
framework
for
seeing
and
labeling
observable
interactions.
Observing
with
the
CLASS
allows
programs
to
meet
multiple
goals.
The
CLASS
serves
as
an
objective,
measureable
approach
to
defining
teacher
effectiveness.
Data
collected
from
these
observations
can
be
used
in
program
planning
from
the
individual
teacher
level
to
the
whole
program
level.
Individual
teacher
observations
allow
coaches
to
identify
areas
of
strength
and
challenge
to
inform
professional
development,
in
order
to
improve
interactions
and
child
outcomes.
CLASS
data
collected
across
classrooms
can
determine
how
to
plan
and
support
improvement
within
teaching
communities.
CLASS
observation
data
also
allows
administrators
to
identify
agency-‐wide
strengths
and
develop
targeted
professional
development
plans.
Classroom
observation
is
the
foundation
of
all
work
with
CLASS.
Trained
and
reliable
CLASS
observers
conduct
live
observations
in
classrooms,
or
use
video
footage.
CLASS
observations
should
start
at
the
beginning
of
the
school
day
and
continue
for
an
extended
period
of
time
(at
least
two
hours,
ideally)
to
capture
the
experience
of
the
typical
student.
The
observation
procedure
requires
the
observer
to
watch,
without
interruption,
activity
in
the
classroom
for
a
period
of
15-‐20
minutes.
During
this
time,
the
observer
focuses
on
the
interactions
between
teachers
and
students
and
among
students
as
defined
by
the
CLASS
measure.
12
Leyva, D., Weiland, C., Barata, M., Yoshikawa, H., Snow, C., Treviño, E. and Rolla, A. (2015), Teacher–
Child Interactions in Chile and Their Associations With Prekindergarten Outcomes. Child Development,
86: 781–799..
10
At
the
end
of
the
20
minutes
of
dedicated
observation
and
note
taking,
the
observer
should
derive
numerical
ratings
for
each
of
the
CLASS
dimensions.
After
assigning
ratings,
the
observer
begins
a
new
CLASS
cycle,
until
four
cycles13
have
been
completed.
Data
is
recorded
on
a
paper
score
sheet
or
online
using
a
desktop
browser
or
mobile
device
through
myTeachstone.
Becoming
Trained
on
the
CLASS
Just as in any measurement approach, collecting valid data using the CLASS requires
training and ongoing calibration of skill. Although numerous studies have validated the
constructs of the CLASS, training and ongoing calibration are necessary to ensure that
observers consistently code classrooms accurately. Consistent accuracy of observations
and coding is referred to as reliability. With training and ongoing calibration of
observation and coding skills, observers are best positioned to provide high-quality data
that is predictive of positive outcomes for children. High-quality data can then drive
teacher professional development plans and general program improvement plans.
Training is critical in the process for collecting high-quality, actionable data.
CLASS
regional
and
onsite
trainings
are
provided
through
Teachstone
with
online
certification
and
recertification.
Teachstone
provides
regional
training
opportunities
across
the
United
States.
The
most
widely
offered
trainings
are
on
CLASS
observation.
These
span
two
days
where
Teachstone
staff
trainers
provide
in-‐depth
trainings
in
small
groups.
After
attending
The
CLASS
Observation
Training,
participants
have
two
months
and
three
opportunities
to
demonstrate
their
ability
to
code
reliably
with
the
CLASS
through
the
online
certification
process.
During
this
two-‐month
period,
participants
have
access
to
their
Teachstone
trainers
for
coding
support.
Once
a
participant
passes
the
online
certification,
they
are
deemed
“reliable”
and
maintain
this
status
for
a
year.
To
maintain
“reliable”
status,
observers
must
pass
Teachstone’s
online
recertification
test
annually.
Observation
training
is
offered
on
each
of
the
CLASS
versions.
Onsite
trainings
are
offered
to
programs
and
are
a
good
option
when
large
numbers
of
individuals
are
seeking
CLASS
training.
These
are
scheduled
on
an
as-‐needed
basis
and
are
typically
provided
for
large
organizations
in
the
early
stages
of
CLASS
implementation,
and
again
when
these
organizations
adopt
additional
levels
of
the
CLASS.
13
If the purpose of observation is to capture program-level data, fewer cycles (2 or 3) may be
conducted; however, for classroom-level data and individualized teacher professional
development, 4 cycles are necessary.
11
Calibration
opportunities
are
also
provided
for
those
interested
in
practicing
their
coding
online,
either
prior
to
certification
or
re-‐certification
or
for
professional
development
prior
to
live
coding
or
video
coding.
In
addition
to
staff
trainers
located
across
the
country,
Teachstone
provides
an
affiliate
trainer
program.
Teachstone’s
Train-‐the-‐Trainer
(TTT)
model
gives
reliable
observers
an
avenue
to
develop
the
training
skills
necessary
to
go
back
to
their
program
and
provide
training
within
their
organizations.
The
TTT
model
allows
programs
to
invest
in
their
staff
and
sustain
CLASS
adoption
at
a
lower
cost
and
with
limited
reliance
on
Teachstone.
TTT
training
is
offered
at
regional
trainings
and
onsite
trainings.
Through
Teachstone
and
affiliate
trainers,
more
than
35,000
education
professionals
have
been
trained
to
reliability
on
the
CLASS.
Teachstone’s
training
model
has
yielded
a
pass
rate
of
greater
than
92%,
with
fewer
than
8%
of
training
participants
demonstrating
insufficient
reliability
on
the
CLASS.
Observers
are
located
across
the
country
and
internationally.
Professional
Development
Training
to
sufficient
reliability
on
the
CLASS
allows
observers
to
produce
valid
data.
This
valid
data
then
informs
professional
development,
allowing
coaches
to
create
actionable
plans
toward
teacher
improvement.
Reliable
observers
are
critical
in
this
system
of
program
improvement,
furnishing
data
that
coaches
can
then
use
to
work
with
teachers.
CLASS
observations
of
interactions
serve
as
a
springboard
for
improvement.
Professional
development
programs
providing
15
or
more
contact
hours
have
been
associated
with
student
achievement14,
and
contact
hours
were
positively
associated
with
teacher-‐reported
changes
in
classroom
practices15,16.
Effective
coaching
models
emphasize
collaboration
between
coaches
and
teachers
and
14
Yoon,
K.S.,
Duncan,
T.,
Lee,
S.W.-‐Y.,
Scarloss,
B.,
&
Shapley,
K.L.,
(2007).
Reviewing
the
evidence
on
how
teacher
professional
development
affects
student
achievement
(Issues
&
Answers
Report
REL
2007-‐No.
033).
Washington,
DC:
U.S.
Department
of
Education,
Institute
of
Education
Sciences,
National
Center
for
Education
Evaluation
and
Regional
Assistance,
Regional
Educational
Laboratory
Southwest.
15
Desimone,
L.M.,
Porter,
A.C.,
Garet,
M.S.,
Yoon,
K.S.,
&
Birman,
B.F.
(2002).
Effects
of
professional
development
effective?
Results
from
a
national
sample
of
teachers.
American
Educational
Research
Journal,
38(4),
915-‐945.
12
early
childhood
educators:
A
mixed
–methods
study
of
coursework
and
coaching.
The
Elementary
School
Journal,
111(1),
63-‐86.
18
Pianta.
R.C.,
Mashburn,
A.J.,
Downer,
J.T.,
Hamre,
B.K.,
&
Justice,
L.
(2008).
Effects
of
web-‐
professional
development
effective?
Results
from
a
national
sample
of
teachers.
American
Educational
Research
Journal,
38(4),
915-‐945.
20
Penuel,
W.R.,
Fishman,
B.J.,
Yamaguchi,
R.,
&
Gallagher,
L.P.
(2007).
What
makes
communities:
A
review
of
the
literature.
Journal
of
Educational
Change,
7(4),
221-‐258.
22
Pianta.
R.C.,
Mashburn,
A.J.,
Downer,
J.T.,
Hamre,
B.K.,
&
Justice,
L.
(2008).
Effects
of
web-‐
classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-‐491.
13
recognize
positive
interactions
and
practice
improving
their
interactions
within
the
CLASS
framework.
Coaches
support
teachers
in
this
effort
and
are
supported
themselves
through
these
professional
development
opportunities.
MyTeachingPartner™
Coaching
(MTP™)
MTP
Coaching
provides
ongoing,
targeted
professional
development
from
Teachstone
specialists
to
teachers,
based
on
observations
of
their
classroom
behavior
through
video.
This
model
allows
teachers
to
receive
feedback
on
both
their
strengths
and
areas
for
improvement
during
ongoing
cycles.
Providing
one-‐
time
feedback
is
not
sufficient
to
improve
interactions;
rather,
data
driven,
regular
feedback
within
a
trusting
relationship
has
been
shown
to
drive
improvement.
The
MTP
Coaching
model
is
based
on
evidence
of
the
effects
of
coaching
and
the
use
of
video
in
coaching,
with
sufficient
contact
between
coach
and
teacher.
Three
large-‐scale
randomized
controlled
trials
revealed
benefits
of
coaching
as
evidenced
through
positive
and
sustained
child
outcomes24,25,26,27.
In
studies
of
MyTeachingPartner
Coaching,
there
were
significant
gains
on
CLASS
scores
for
teachers
receiving
web
resources
and
coaching
versus
those
receiving
access
to
web
resources
only
or
no
intervention28.
These
studies
strongly
suggest
that
coaching
can
be
a
key
means
for
transferring
newly
learned
skills
into
practice.
24
Domitrovich,
C.E.,
Gest,
S.D.,
Gill,
S.,
Bierman,
K.L.,
Welsh,
J.A.,
&
Jones,
D.
(2009).
Fostering
high-‐quality
teaching
with
an
enriched
curriculum
and
professional
development
support:
The
Head
Start
REDI
program.
American
Educational
Research
Journal,
46(2),
567-‐597.
25
Raver,
C.C.,
Jones,
S.M.,
Li-‐Grining,
C.P.,
Metzger,
M.,
Champion,
K.M.,
&
Sardin,
L.
(2008).
(2014).
Effects
of
Head
Start
REDI
on
children’s
outcomes
1
year
later
in
different
kindergarten
contexts.
Child
Developmetn,
85(1),
140-‐159.
27
Bierman,
K.L.,
Sanford
DeRousie,
R.M.,
Heinrichs,
B.,
Domitrovich,
C.E.,
Greenberg,
M.T.,
&
Gill,
S.
(2013).
Sustaining
high-‐quality
teaching
and
evidence-‐based
curricula:
Follow-‐up
assessment
of
teachers
in
the
REDI
project.
Early
Education
and
Development,
24(8),
1194-‐
1213.
28
Pianta.
R.C.,
Mashburn,
A.J.,
Downer,
J.T.,
Hamre,
B.K.,
&
Justice,
L.
(2008).
Effects
of
web-‐
14
In
MTP
Coaching,
teachers
work
closely
with
a
trained
MTP
coach
over
a
10-‐month
period
to
develop
a
critical
eye
for
observing
their
CLASS
interactions
with
students—building
on
what’s
working
well
and
boosting
the
effectiveness
of
the
interactions
they
provide.
Using
video
from
teachers’
classrooms
and
the
CLASS
framework,
coaches
provide
individualized,
targeted
feedback
and
support
through
structured
observation
cycles.
Teachstone
is
dedicated
to
ensuring
that
local
programs
can
build
capacity
to
use
evidence-‐based
coaching
models.
Teachstone
provides
support
to
local
coaches
or
directly
coaches
teachers,
depending
on
a
program’s
needs.
Teachstone
also
provides
credentialing
for
MTP
coaches
to
support
local
capacity
building.
Research
shows
that
through
this
intensive
one-‐on-‐one
coaching
program,
teachers
improve
the
effectiveness
of
their
interactions
with
students
and
report
15
higher
levels
of
job
satisfaction
and
motivation.
Students
in
MTP
classrooms
show
greater
gains
in
early
literacy
and
language
development
and
lower
levels
of
problem
behavior.
Research
has
demonstrated
that
MTP
can
be
effective
at
scale,
when
delivered
with
local
coaches.
From
2011
to
2014,
Georgia
adopted
and
evaluated
MTP
Coaching
and
Making
the
Most
of
Classroom
Interactions
(MMCI,
described
below).
This
adoption
involved
randomly
assigning
teachers
to
MTP
Coaching,
MMCI,
or
a
control
group
that
did
not
receive
intentional
support.
MTP
and
MMCI
participants
demonstrated
positive
changes
in
teaching
practices,
with
greater
knowledge
of
effective
interactions
and
higher
CLASS
scores
than
teachers
who
received
no
support.
This
statewide
implementation
provides
evidence
that
these
models
can
be
scaled
successfully.29
Making
the
Most
of
Classroom
Interactions
(MMCI)
MMCI
was
developed
out
of
a
college
course30,
which
was
created
to
provide
cost-‐
effective,
empirically
based,
scalable
professional
development
for
preschool
educators.
The
course
was
developed
through
the
University
of
Virginia’s
Center
for
the
Advanced
Study
of
Teaching
and
Learning
(CASTL)
and
the
National
Center
for
Research
on
Early
Childhood
Education
(NCRECE),
a
project
funded
by
the
U.S.
Department
of
Education’s
Institute
for
Education
Sciences.
The
college
course
demonstrated
improvement
in
teacher
interactions
but
was
not
widely
available.
Teachstone
created
MMCI
from
that
college
course
so
that
teachers,
regardless
of
where
they
live,
could
benefit
from
this
support.
MMCI
is
an
interactive
course
for
preschool
teachers
led
by
a
Teachstone-‐trained
instructor
within
organizations.
Over
the
course
of
ten
sessions,
instructors
provide
in-‐person
training
to
a
group
of
teachers,
preparing
them
to
identify,
understand,
and
apply
more
effective
interactions
to
their
classrooms
based
on
the
CLASS
framework.
Local
MMCI
instructors
work
directly
with
Teachstone’s
professional
development
specialists,
to
deepen
their
CLASS
content
knowledge,
increase
their
training
and
facilitation
skills,
and
improve
their
ability
to
guide
teachers
in
application
of
the
CLASS
framework
and
support
local
capacity
building.
Teachers
who
participate
in
MMCI
learn
to
identify
and
describe
effective
interactions
in
classrooms
and
care
settings,
participate
in
peer
discussions
on
how
to
interact
intentionally
to
increase
children’s
learning,
and
gain
access
to
print
and
video
resources
aligned
with
the
CLASS
framework.
29
Early,
D.
M.,
Maxwell,
K.
L.,
Skinner,
D.,
Kraus,
S.,
Hume,
K.,
&
Pan,
Y.
(2014).
Georgia's
Pre-‐
K
professional
development
evaluation:
Final
report.
Chapel
Hill:
University
of
North
Carolina
at
Chapel
Hill,
Frank
Porter
Graham
Child
Development
Institute.
30
Hamre,
B.
K.,
Pianta,
R.
C.,
Burchinal,
M.
Field,
S.
Locasale-‐Crouch,
J.L.,
Downer,
J.
T…Scott-‐
Little,
C.
(2012).
A
course
on
effective
teacher-‐child
interactions:
Effects
on
teacher
beliefs,
knowledge,
and
observed
practice.
American
Education
Research
Journal,
49
(1),
88–123.
16
Instructional
Support
Strategies
(ISS)
Instructional
Support
is
one
of
three
domains
on
the
Pre-‐K,
K-‐3,
Upper
Elementary
and
Secondary
CLASS
scales.
This
specialized
training
allows
participants
to
focus
on
effective
instructional
support
strategies.
The
Instructional
Support
domain
measures
how
effective
teachers
are
in
helping
children
learn
to
solve
problems,
reason,
and
think,
how
they
use
feedback
to
expand
and
deepen
skills
and
knowledge,
and
how
they
guide
children
in
developing
more
complex
language
skills.
Instructional
Support
scores
are
predictive
of
academic
achievement
for
students,
yet
instructional
support
strategies
have
not
been
widely
offered
to
teachers.
Rather,
professional
supports
on
classroom
organization
and
student
social-‐emotional,
pre-‐academic
and
academic
needs
are
prevalent.
Instructional
Support
Strategies
provides
specific
guidance
to
mentors
and
coaches
in
supporting
teachers
as
they
identify
and
capitalize
on
opportunities
to
deepen
and
stretch
student
cognition.
Data
across
all
domains
should,
however,
drive
professional
development,
coaching,
and
program
planning.
ISS
introduces
teachers
to
the
Instructional
Support
indicators
and
dimensions
in
a
one-‐day,
face-‐to-‐face
training
or
an
applied
and
engaging
online
environment.
Teachers
with
little
or
no
CLASS
experience
build
their
knowledge
by
connecting
Instructional
Support
interactions
to
current
practice.
With
videos
of
real
classrooms,
on-‐demand
access,
and
discussion
boards,
teachers
practice
strategies
for
deepening
instructional
support
in
their
classrooms.
CLASS
Feedback
Strategies
CLASS
Feedback
Strategies
was
developed
to
guide
coaches
in
effective
approaches
to
providing
feedback
to
teachers.
Effective
feedback
loops
involve
building
trusting
relationships
and
properly
identifying
areas
of
opportunity
for
teacher
improvement.
Feedback
Strategies
is
offered
as
a
one-‐day,
face-‐to-‐face
training
or
three-‐module
online
course,
providing
structure
for
coaches
to
discuss
CLASS
observations
and
how
to
share
them
with
teachers.
Participants
learn
how
to
translate
observational
data
into
meaningful
feedback
that
impacts
teacher
practice,
prepare
to
lead
meaningful
conferences
with
teachers,
and
gain
strategies
for
working
with
diverse
groups
of
teachers,
including
those
with
different
levels
of
CLASS
knowledge
and
those
who
may
be
resistant
to
change.
Each
online
module
takes
15–20
minutes
and
the
entire
course
takes
an
hour.
Module
1:
Score
Sharing
and
Focus
This
module
covers
when
to
share
CLASS
scores
and
ranges,
and
when
to
share
neither,
drawing
on
case
studies
to
determine
when
each
is
17
appropriate.
It
also
provides
guidance
around
how
to
focus
feedback
without
overwhelming
teachers.
Module
2:
Observational
Examples
This
module
covers
how
to
draft
observational
CLASS
examples
that
are
relevant
and
meaningful
to
teachers.
Coaches
will
use
real
classroom
videos
to
learn
how
to
draft
feedback
that
is
objective,
descriptive,
specific,
and
aligned.
Module
3:
Advice
or
Feedback
This
module
covers
the
differences
between
advice
and
feedback,
and
when
each
is
appropriate
when
meeting
with
a
teacher.
myTeachstone:
Professional
Development
and
Data
Management
myTeachstone,
a
technology
platform
solution
for
professional
development
and
data
management31,
was
launched
in
2015
to
● Support
data-‐driven
professional
development
decisions
and
programs;
● Drive
professionals
to
Teachstone’s
web-‐based
system
for
training,
technical
assistance,
and
practice-‐based
professional
development
structures;
● Tailor
professional
development
resources
for
individual
teachers
based
on
CLASS
observations;
and
● Provide
visibility
to
administrators
interested
in
the
effectiveness
of
teacher
practices
and
growth
within
and
across
classrooms
31
Available
to
support
implementation
with
CLASS
Infant,
Toddler
and
Pre-‐K
18
high-‐quality
teaching
with
an
enriched
curriculum
and
professional
development
support:
The
Head
Start
REDI
program.
American
Educational
Research
Journal,
46(2),
567-‐597.
33
Raver,
C.C.,
Jones,
S.M.,
Li-‐Grining,
C.P.,
Metzger,
M.,
Champion,
K.M.,
&
Sardin,
L.
(2008).
(2014).
Effects
of
Head
Start
REDI
on
children’s
outcomes
1
year
later
in
different
kindergarten
contexts.
Child
Developmetn,
85(1),
140-‐159.
35
Bierman,
K.L.,
Sanford
DeRousie,
R.M.,
Heinrichs,
B.,
Domitrovich,
C.E.,
Greenberg,
M.T.,
&
Gill,
S.
(2013).
Sustaining
high-‐quality
teaching
and
evidence-‐based
curricula:
Follow-‐up
assessment
of
teachers
in
the
REDI
project.
Early
Education
and
Development,
24(8),
1194-‐
1213.
36
Darling-‐Hammond,
L.,
Wei,
R.C.,
Andree,
A.,
Richardson,
N.,
&
Orphanos,
S.
(2009).
Professional
learning
in
the
learning
profession:
A
status
report
on
teacher
development
in
the
United
States
and
abroad.
Washington,
DC:
National
Staff
Development
Council
and
The
School
Redesign
Network
at
Stanford
University.
19
37
Neuman,
S.
B.,
&
Wright,
T.
S.
(2010).
Promoting
language
and
literacy
development
for
early
childhood
educators:
A
mixed
–methods
study
of
coursework
and
coaching.
The
Elementary
School
Journal,
111(1),
63-‐86.
38
Pianta.
R.C.,
Mashburn,
A.J.,
Downer,
J.T.,
Hamre,
B.K.,
&
Justice,
L.
(2008).
Effects
of
web-‐
professional
development
effective?
Results
from
a
national
sample
of
teachers.
American
Educational
Research
Journal,
38(4),
915-‐945.
40
Penuel,
W.R.,
Rishman,
B.J.,
Yamaguchi,
R.,
&
Gallagher,
L.P
(2007).
What
makes
20
prevention
programs:
A
two-‐phased
coaching
model.
Clinical
Child
and
Family
Psychology
Review,
16(2),
213-‐228.
21
30
countries
in
varying
formats,
ranging
from
local
research
projects
to
large-‐scale
implementations
at
regional
and
national
levels
of
government.
Peer-‐reviewed
research
studies
are
ongoing
in
many
countries,
including
Australia,
China,
Ecuador,
Denmark,
Germany,
and
Finland.
Large-‐scale
implementations
are
underway
in
four
continents
globally.
The
Teachstone
Network
Teachstone’s
field-‐based
network
of
regional
directors,
client
relations
directors,
and
trainers
is
located
across
the
country,
and
provides
guidance
from
exploring
teacher
improvement
approaches
to
early
adoption
and
ongoing
teacher
improvement.
Teachstone
regional
directors
support
programs
in
their
early
adoption
of
the
CLASS
system
and
client
relations
directors
provide
ongoing
system
improvement
support
using
the
CLASS.
Regional
directors
and
client
relations
directors
serve
as
consultants
to
clients,
learning
about
the
unique
characteristics
and
needs
of
programs
and
supporting
the
development
of
implementation
plans
both
domestically
and
internationally.
They
serve
as
clients’
main
point
of
contact
to
ensure
immediate
access
to
informational
and
operational
supports
from
Teachstone.
Teachstone’s
staff
trainers,
located
across
the
country,
work
to
provide
access
across
the
nation
and
internationally.
The
more
than
35,000
observers
trained
to
reliability
on
the
CLASS
support
implementations
across
the
United
States,
in
the
U.S.
territories,
and
internationally.
Through
Teachstone’s
Train-‐the-‐Trainer
program,
affiliate
trainers
within
organizations
are
able
to
provide
ongoing
training
to
maintain
and
improve
CLASS
knowledge
and
support
new
professionals
entering
the
field
as
a
result
of
growth
or
turnover.
To
date,
Teachstone
has
certified
more
than
2000
affiliate
trainers
who
have
been
integral
in
producing
more
than
35,000
reliable
observers
with
Teachstone.
Teachstone’s
offerings
have
built
networks
across
the
country
and
internationally
to
support
teachers
as
they
improve
their
interactions.
Quality
Assurance
Teachstone
trainers
have
extensive
experience
using
the
CLASS
as
observers,
trainers,
and
coaches.
Teachstone
monitors
existing
trainer
competencies
as
measured
through
participant
pass
rates
and
participant
evaluations
in
addition
to
ongoing
demonstration
of
CLASS
mastery.
Each
trainer
is
assigned
to
a
veteran
Teachstone
trainer
who
serves
as
a
mentor
and
ongoing
contact
person.
Initially,
this
person
is
either
the
training
manager
or
the
senior
advisor
of
training
and
professional
development.
Teachstone
trainers
participate
in
monthly
training
team
22
support
calls.
All
trainers
complete
a
quarterly
calibration,
are
required
to
recertify
annually,
and
participate
in
regular
one-‐on-‐one
meetings
with
the
training
manager.
Maintaining
Reliability
CLASS
observations
are
used
in
many
ways,
in
professional
development,
accountability,
and
research.
In
order
to
successfully
complete
the
certification
process,
individuals
must
demonstrate
sufficient
ability
to
reliably
score
on
the
CLASS.
Obtaining
this
certification,
however,
does
not
guarantee
that
observers
will
continue
to
employ
these
skills
as
they
go
into
the
field
to
collect
CLASS
data.
It
is
important
to
develop
practices
to
maximize
observers’
ability
to
reliably
code
across
all
observations.
The
extent
to
which
observers
need
to
maintain
high
levels
of
reliability
is
dependent
on
the
purpose
of
CLASS
observations.
Teachstone
certifies
observers
who
have
reached
80%
agreement
with
master
codes.
This
minimum
requirement
allows
for
broad
access
to
the
CLASS
for
those
who
demonstrate
reasonable
accuracy.
The
way
CLASS
data
are
being
used
should
drive
decisions
about
the
type
and
frequency
of
observer
supports
provided
throughout
the
year.
For
example,
when
CLASS
is
being
used
for
accountability
or
other
high-‐stakes
purposes,
programs
should
consider
setting
higher
levels
of
reliability
to
help
increase
levels
of
accuracy
in
CLASS
observations.
This
can
be
achieved
through
a
process
of
double-‐coding
with
a
highly
experienced
CLASS
affiliate
trainer
following
initial
CLASS
certification.
Calibration
provides
opportunities
for
observers
to
code
a
sample
classroom
and
receive
feedback
on
those
codes
from
a
Teachstone
master
coder.
Calibrations
are
recommended
6
months
after
becoming
certified
on
the
CLASS
and
6
months
after
each
successful
recertification.
For
individuals
who
conduct
frequent
observations,
typically
for
accountability
or
research,
calibration
is
recommended
every
2-‐4
weeks
or
every
10-‐15
live
observations.
Calibration
involves
coding
Teachstone
videos
that
have
been
master
coded
and
determining
reliability
against
the
master
23
codes.
If
a
coder
fails
to
achieve
at
least
80%
agreement,
they
should
receive
extra
support
from
a
veteran
coder.
After
individuals
watch
and
code
the
calibration
videos,
it
is
recommended
that
groups
meet
to
discuss
the
master
codes,
dimension
by
dimension,
focusing
on
dimensions
where
observers
coded
with
insufficient
reliability.
Many
CLASS
users
also
decide
to
double
code
videos
to
provide
ongoing
insight
into
the
reliability
of
the
data
being
collected.
Although
the
amount
of
double
coding
that
should
occur
depends
on
the
way
the
CLASS
is
being
used,
we
typically
recommend
double
coding
10-‐20%
of
observations.
This
allows
users
to
monitor
for
problems
in
data
collection.
For
example,
it
is
possible
to
identify
particular
coders
who
may
consistently
be
scoring
quite
differently
than
a
second
coder.
These
issues
can
then
be
addressed
with
additional
calibration
support
in
ways
that
will
help
ensure
higher
quality
data.
The
ultimate
goal
of
all
of
these
efforts
(training,
certification,
calibration,
and
double
coding)
is
to
ensure
that
the
CLASS
data
collected
offer
the
most
accurate
assessment
of
teacher-‐child
interactions.
Although
taking
these
steps
is
an
investment
in
time
and
resources,
it
is
an
essential
part
of
high-‐quality
CLASS
implementation.
Teachstone:
Delivering
on
the
Promise
of
CLASS
The
CLASS
system
was
developed
through
decades
of
large-‐scale
studies
involving
tens
of
thousands
of
teachers
and
classrooms
and
several
major
randomized
control
trials
of
professional
development
interventions.
The
system
defines
and
supports
the
effective
teacher
practices
that
contribute
to
positive
developmental
and
academic
outcomes
for
students.
It
is
through
evidence-‐based,
ongoing,
sustained
efforts
to
improve
teacher-‐student
interactions
that
children
will
no
longer
be
subject
to
chance,
but
will
be
guaranteed
to
receive
highly
effective
teachers,
year
after
year.
To
do
this
at
scale,
Teachstone
was
founded
in
2008
with
the
mission
to
create
a
lasting
positive
impact
on
children’s
development
and
academic
performance
by
using
research
to:
(1)
define
the
features
of
teacher-‐student
interactions
that
contribute
to
improved
student
outcomes;
(2)
create
observation-‐
based
assessments
to
accurately
measure
the
nature
and
quality
of
those
interactions,
and
(3)
provide
in-‐person
and
online
professional
development
that
improves
teachers’
effectiveness
based
on
assessments
of
teacher-‐student
interaction.
The
CLASS
assesses
those
aspects
of
a
teacher’s
interaction
with
a
child
that
contribute
to
learning
and
development.
Each
version
of
the
CLASS
measures
developmentally
aligned
dimensions
of
teacher-‐student
interaction.
Hundreds
of
studies,
conducted
across
all
versions
of
the
CLASS
and
with
several
thousand
students,
show
that
when
teachers’
behaviors
are
consistent
with
high
ratings
on
24
these
dimensions,
children
are
more
likely
to
demonstrate
increased
learning
and
development
gains.
Teachstone
has
developed
a
suite
of
products
and
professional
development
offerings
that
have
been
proven
effective
in
improving
teaching
across
the
CLASS
dimensions.
The
CLASS
is
the
most
highly
researched
and
consistently
valid
assessment
tool
for
measuring
quality
of
teacher-‐student
interaction
across
early
childhood
and
K-‐12
classrooms,
creating
a
common
language
and
assessment
approach
across
these
two
systems
of
education.
In
the
field
of
early
childhood
education,
CLASS
has
redefined
what
is
meant
by
the
term
“quality.”
Previous
measures
of
quality
in
early
childhood
settings
focused
primarily
on
structural
factors,
like
teacher-‐to-‐child
ratios,
or
aspects
of
the
physical
environment,
such
as
the
number
of
books
in
the
classroom.
The
CLASS
focuses
specifically
on
the
point-‐of-‐impact
opportunities
to
learn
provided
by
early
childhood
education
investments—the
effectiveness
with
which
teachers
interact
with
children.
Teachstone’s
national
network
supports
federal,
state
and
local
teacher
improvement
efforts
in
Head
Start,
child
care
and
state
pre-‐K.
Teachstone’s
assessment
and
professional
development
systems
are
used
by
programs
serving
children
from
the
time
they
are
born
until
they
enter
kindergarten,
and
through
the
elementary,
middle,
and
high
school
years.
Importantly,
CLASS
has
been
deployed
at
scale
with
consistent
results
and
validity.
Teachstone
has
had
a
profound
impact
on
teachers,
students,
and
education
programs
nationally,
with
the
greatest
impact
in
early
childhood
education.
Teachstone
has
demonstrated
that
a
classroom
observation
system
can
be
deployed
at
scale
with
reliability,
fidelity,
and
validity.
More
than
35,000
education
professionals
have
been
trained
to
use
the
CLASS
and
have
demonstrated
competency
by
passing
a
reliability
test.
These
professionals
are
located
across
the
country
and
provide
professional
development
to
teachers
using
the
CLASS,
to
the
benefit
of
children
enrolled
in
state
education
programs,
Head
Start,
and
internationally.
25