Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Twjo 1 TCD St1 0004 Rev C (Rev) Nono
Twjo 1 TCD St1 0004 Rev C (Rev) Nono
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C
DOCUMENT/DRAWING TECHNICAL
VERIFICATION AND REVISION RECORD
APPROVED
PREPARED
/DESIGNED
CHECKED
DATE OF
REV. No.
DESCRIPTION
* Delete as Appropriate
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 2 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 7
1.1 Scope of Report........................................................................................................ 7
1.2 Design Package Affiliation ........................................................................................ 7
2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION – LEBAK BULUS STATION .............................................. 8
2.1 Description of structure ............................................................................................. 8
2.2 Structural modelling .................................................................................................11
2.2.1 General ....................................................................................................... 11
2.2.2 Methodology................................................................................................ 12
2.3 Loadings ..................................................................................................................13
2.3.1 Dead Load................................................................................................... 13
2.3.2 Super imposed Dead Load .......................................................................... 15
2.3.3 Live Load .................................................................................................... 16
2.3.4 Braking & Traction Load .............................................................................. 17
2.3.5 Temperature Load ....................................................................................... 18
2.3.6 Wind effects ................................................................................................ 18
2.3.7 Seismic Loadings ........................................................................................ 19
2.4 Load Combinations..................................................................................................22
3. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................23
3.1 Seismic Response of structure ................................................................................23
3.2 Mode Shapes ..........................................................................................................23
3.3 Fundamental Time period ........................................................................................25
3.4 Seismic mass participation ......................................................................................25
3.5 Lateral Seismic Inter-storey drift ..............................................................................25
4. SUBSOIL CONDITIONS ...............................................................................................33
4.1 Stratification.............................................................................................................33
4.1.1 Stratum 1: Alluvial Fan (Unit Qav) ............................................................... 33
4.1.2 Stratum 2: Bojongmanik Formation (Unit Tmb) ............................................ 33
4.2 Groundwater Conditions ..........................................................................................33
4.2.1 Borehole Reference .................................................................................... 34
4.3 Reduction of Soil Properties due to Cyclic Loading ..................................................34
4.3.1 Reduction of Undrained Shear Strength ...................................................... 34
4.3.2 Reduction of Soil Stiffness ........................................................................... 34
4.4 Subsoil Properties ...................................................................................................36
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 3 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
APPENDICES
Appendix A : Geological Profile at CP102 Cipete Raya Station
Appendix B : Site Zoning and SPT-N Design Line
Appendix C : Pile Schedule
Appendix D : Calculation Sheet for Pile Axial Bearing Capacity
Appendix E : Summary of pile Settlement
Appendix F : List of Relevant Drawings
Appendix G : List of Reference Drawings
Appendix H : List of standards & codes
Appendix I : Loading Plan Drawing
Appendix J : Design Calculation of Pile & Pile Cap
List of Tables
Table 1 – Design Package Affiliation ..................................................................................... 7
Table 2 – Summary of Load Combinations ...........................................................................22
Table 3 – STAAD mass participation table ...........................................................................23
Table 4 – Drift Displacements from STAAD and amplified values in longitudinal direction ....26
Table 5 – Comparison of displacements with inter-storey drift limits .....................................28
Table 6 – Drift Displacements from STAAD and amplified values in Transverse direction ....29
Table 7 – Comparison of displacements with inter-storey drift limits .....................................31
Table 8 – Recommended Geotechnical Design Parameters ................................................36
Table 9 – List of published studies on Vs to SPT-N correlations ...........................................37
Table 10 – Site Zoning .........................................................................................................37
Table 11 – Minimum Factor of Safety for Design ..................................................................40
Table 12 – Bored Pile Design Parameters* ..........................................................................41
Table 13 – Summary of Design Pile Length..........................................................................47
Table 14 – Typical axial loads & moments for pile design.....................................................49
Table 15 – Typical analysis results of pile design .................................................................50
Table 16 – Design moments in Pile Cap ...............................................................................51
Table 17 – Stress Check from Oasys ...................................................................................51
Table 18 – Recommended Allowable Settlement for Buildings*............................................54
Table 19 – Summary of Pile Settlement ...............................................................................56
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Typical section at the pier location of entire station ............................................... 8
Figure 2 – Typical platform layout of station. ......................................................................... 8
Figure 3 – Typical Section of Box Girder with Rail Plinth & Rolling Stock .............................. 9
Figure 4 – Typical Section at pier location supporting viaduct & precast girders. ................... 9
Figure 5 – Typical Plan at pier location supporting viaduct & precast girders ......................... 9
Figure 6 – Typical Elevation at pier location supporting viaduct & precast girders ................10
Figure 7 – Concourse floor layout of Lebak Bulus Station ....................................................10
Figure 8 – Column Layout at Ground Level ..........................................................................11
Figure 9 – Beam Frame layout at Concourse Level ..............................................................11
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 5 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 6 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
1. INTRODUCTION
The proposed rail based Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) will consist of South-
North and East West Corridors. The construction of the South-North Corridor will be
completed in two stages. Stage 1 will be carried out to connect Cipete Raya with
Bunderan HI which comprises 15.7km of twin track rails, of which 4.8km passes
through twin tunnels with the remainder supported on elevated viaducts. There are
13 stations in total, of which 6 are underground, including a fully functional depot
covering approximately 8.3 hectares. Stage 2 will expand the South-North corridor
from Bunderan HI to Kampung Bandan.
Stage 1 of the project is divided into six civil contract packages (CP), in which
CP101 to CP103 are elevated sections and CP104 to CP106 are underground
section. There are two other contract packages; CP107 for the track work and
CP108 for the rolling stock.
CP101 and CP102 are the contract packages relevant to the elevated sections.
These comprise three elevated stations (lebak bulus, Fatmawati and Cipete Raya),
a depot, approach structures and a viaduct structure of approximately 5.95 km,
which stretches from chainage -0K576m714 to +5K369m249. From the depot at
Jalan Pasar Jumat, the alignment follows Jalan Kartini and Jalan Cipete Raya to the
north and towards the contract boundary with CP103 at the southern end of Haji
Nawi Station.
This report describes the structural and geotechnical design methodology of the
foundations for the Lebak Bulus Station of CP101 contract package.
The design of following structural elements of Lebak Bulus Station is covered in this
report
Bored Pile Foundation
Pile Cap reinforcement design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 7 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 8 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Figure 3 – Typical Section of Box Girder with Rail Plinth & Rolling Stock
The platform level is supported via a cross pier head protruding from the main pier.
It is proposed that the tracks be made independent from the platform in order to
avoid continual vibrations being transferred to the main frame of station. This cross
arm pier head shall support precast girders as shown in the section below on both
sides.
Figure 4 – Typical Section at pier location supporting viaduct & precast girders.
Figure 5 – Typical Plan at pier location supporting viaduct & precast girders
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 9 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Figure 6 – Typical Elevation at pier location supporting viaduct & precast girders
The platform slab shall be supported over these precast girders. The precast girders
are currently proposed with I sections and shall support the platform hollow core
slab and a 50mm concrete topping to provide in for a diaphragm type action in the
transverse direction. Further, the precast girders are proposed to be supported on
temporary steel work as shown in the above picture. Thereafter the central core
between the two girders & above the cross pier head shall be cast in cast – in – situ
concrete to provide a continuous junction. The reinforcement for negative moment
at this location shall be provided in the top 245mm cast – in – situ concrete.
A main concourse level is proposed beneath the main box girder to carry the
services pertaining to the station. The width of concourse is 22.3m. The columns
from concourse level to platform level only run on grid A & C of station as shown in
figure below.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 10 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 11 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 12 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
2.3 Loadings
The basic loads & load combinations as defined in design manual have been
described and compared with relevant counterparts of Indonesian standard and it is
described that by adhering to the design manual parameter & EC8 guidelines a
conservative design has been envisaged.
2.3.1 Dead Load
The dead load of structure from various components can be described as follows:
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 13 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 14 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 15 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 16 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 17 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Futher as per ACI the cracked inertia of RCC members may be taken as 70% of the gross inertia.
Therefore effective differential temperature for which the structure should be designed becomes
t= 2.08 x 0.7 = 1.46 o C for temp. rise & shrinkage With full
t= -14.58 x 0.7 = -10.21 o C for temp. fall & shrinkage value of E
X Z X Z
0° 0.86 11 7.568
90° -1.3 11 -11.44
0° 0.59 12.5 5.9
90° -1.3 12.5 -13
0° 0.85 11 7.48
90° -0.6 11 -5.28
0° 0.68 12.5 6.8
90° -0.4 12.5 -4
Note : Pressure Coefficient are taken from BS 6399-2:1997 (Table 26 & Table 37)
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 18 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
k) Seismic Performance I
Function of structure is retained without conducting repair after an earthquake, and
no excessive displacement occurs.
l) Seismic Performance II
Repair may be required after an earthquake, but function of structure can be
restored within a short period.
The damage levels of reinforced concrete structures are defined in regards to the
load-displacement curve of the structure. The load-displacement relationship of
reinforced concrete columns subjected to moderate axial force for which the failure
mode is expected to be in flexure is similar to the curve shown in Figure 11.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 19 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Damage Level 1
Longitudinal reinforcement yield point is set as the limit for damage level 1. This is
shown by point B on the graph. It is expected that within this limit no extensive
repair will be necessary for the structure as the structure will remain essentially
elastic. Durability of structure however should be ensured as the structure has
suffered cracking.
Damage Level 2
The maximum capacity point (point C on graph) is set as the limit for damage level
2. At this point the longitudinal reinforcement has passed the yield point and the
cracks are wider. Crack injection and/or patching may be necessary.
Damage Level 3
The limit is set at the maximum displacement with no reduction in yield capacity
(point D). At this point it is expected that further displacement will occur without any
increase in capacity. The repair method is expected to include patching of spalled
concrete and remediation of ties.
For MDE, in accordance with EC8, the following response reduction factor is used:-
For I = 1, R = 1.61,
For I = 1.4, R = 2.26.
In line of the details specified above a graphical representation of spectrums is
compared and shown below. The graph compares the ODE, MDE spectrums with
the reduced spectrum for nominal earthquake as per SNI1726: 2012 with different
Response reduction factor as per SNI1726.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 20 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
0.70
SNI 1726 Design Spectrum
0.60
ODE - Soil Profile - A
0.50
Spectral Acceleration
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Time Period
1
SNI 1726 Design Spectrum * 1.5
0.9
MDE - Soil Profile A
0.8
SNI 1726 * 1.5 / (RRF = 8/Ie = 1.25)
Spectral Acceleration (g)
0.7
SNI 1726*1.5 / (RRF = 5 /Ie = 1.25)
0.6
MDE / (RRF 2.37/ I = 1.4)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Time Period
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 21 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Further it can also be seen that as defined earlier the Reduction factor of 2.26 with
Importance factor of 1.4 resulting in net reduction of MDE spectrum by 1.61 can be
further used to decrease the MDE design spectrum to provide for an economic
design. Please note that even after this reduction this MDE spectrum still is higher
that the Ultimate earthquake spectrum with reduction factors of either 5 or 8.
In conclusion, for the seismic loading conditions, using the ODE and MDE response
spectrum and criterion as directed by the “Supplemental Design Specification to
ODS 15: Seismic Loading” issued by the Engineer is more onerous than the
response spectrum from SNI1726:2012 as can be seen from Figure 12 and Figure
13.
From the table, under normal conditions the serviceability and ultimate limit state for
the load combination using the British code is more onerous. For the seismic
condition, ODE conditions, EC8 is more onerous. However, for MDE, based on load
combination factor, SNI is more onerous, but due to the higher response factor (E),
the design in accordance with EC8 is more onerous.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 22 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
3. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
3.1 Seismic Response of structure
Response Spectrum Analysis is adopted to analyze the behavior of the entire
structure during a seismic event. This approach permits the multiple modes of
response of a structure to be taken into account. This is required in many building
codes for all except for very simple or very complex structures. The response of a
structure can be defined as a combination of many mode shapes. In this analysis,
STAAD Pro software is used to determine these modes for a structure. For each
mode, a response is read from the design spectrum, two design spectrums i.e. ODE
and MDE. It is based on the modal frequency and the modal mass, and they are
further combined to provide an estimate of the total response of the structure.
Combination methods include the complete quadratic combination (CQC).
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 23 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 24 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
With the site specific spectrum since we are following a reduction factor of 2.37 with
Importance factor 1.4 we should alter this amplification factor in proportionality to
make it on the same grounds for SNI1726:2012.
Mass center deflection on level x (δx) (mm) must be determined in accordance with
following equation:
𝐶𝑑 𝛿𝑥𝑒
𝛿𝑥 =
𝐼𝑒
Annotation:
Cd = deflection amplification factor in Table 9
δxe = deflection on required location in this article that determined by elastic
analysis
Ie = earthquake significance factor that determined in accordance with 4.1.2 of
SNI 1726:2012.
SNI 1726:2012 Design value
Design Spectrum (Sa/g) (Sa/g)SNI 1726:2012 (Sa/g)SOIL PROFILE A - MDE
Load Combination Factor 1.5 1.0
Importance Factor 1.5 1.4
Response Reduction 8.0 2.35
Factor
Deflection Amplification 5.5 To be evaluated (X)
factor
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 25 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
For,
Time period (T) = 1.42401 seconds
(Sa/g)SNI 1726:2012 = 0.765 (including FOS = 1.5)
(Sa/g)SOIL PROFILE A – MDE = 0.33408
Hence
X = (0.765 * 1.5 * 5.5 / 8.0)/ (.33408*1.4/2.35) = 4.373 say 4.40
Following table gives the nodal displacements at different level including ground,
their amplified values and relative displacement between the floors compared to the
limits.
Table 4 – Drift Displacements from STAAD and amplified values in longitudinal
direction
Magnified Magnified
Nodal Drift Displacement Nodal Drift Displacement
from STAAD at lower from STAAD, at upper
δe2 concourse δe3 concourse
level, δ2 level, δ3
mm mm mm mm
68.329 113.88 97.341 162.24
69.190 115.32 97.964 163.27
66.528 110.88 97.800 163.00
70.154 116.92 97.766 162.94
66.322 110.54 98.128 163.55
70.694 117.82 98.088 163.48
66.536 110.89 98.509 164.18
71.295 118.83 98.495 164.16
66.604 111.01 98.953 164.92
71.968 119.95 98.870 164.78
66.913 111.52 99.192 165.32
72.019 120.03 98.922 164.87
66.869 111.45 99.056 165.09
71.454 119.09 98.657 164.43
66.709 111.18 98.753 164.59
70.942 118.24 98.387 163.98
66.744 111.24 98.459 164.10
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 26 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 27 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 28 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Magnified Magnified
Nodal Drift Displacement Nodal Drift Displacement
from STAAD at lower from STAAD, at upper
δe2 concourse δe3 concourse
level, δ2 level, δ3
mm mm mm mm
67.874 113.12 95.141 158.57
64.666 107.78 90.750 151.25
63.340 105.57 96.031 160.05
69.028 115.05 96.495 160.83
64.761 107.94 97.123 161.87
70.089 116.82 97.567 162.61
64.601 107.67 98.402 164.00
71.131 118.55 98.699 164.50
65.071 108.45 99.529 165.88
72.545 120.91 99.801 166.34
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 29 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 31 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 32 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
4. SUBSOIL CONDITIONS
4.1 Stratification
The subsoil encountered at the Cipete Raya Station site generally consists of the
Alluvial Fan (Unit Qav) and the Bojongmanik Formation (Unit Tmb) as shown below.
The stratification of the project site can be found in Appendix A.
Detailed information of geotechnical condition at the project site is described in
Geotechnical Interpretative Report ((TWJO-CP12-TCD-DSR-0001-Rev 2)).
Groundwater was measured in all boreholes during the SI works. Based on the
groundwater levels measured during borehole drilling, the groundwater levels
generally range from 1.0m to 9.6m below ground level (mbgl) with an average of
4.7mbgl.
Casagrande type standpipes were installed in boreholes within CP104 and CP105
to monitor the existing ground water table for approximately 6 months. Based on the
groundwater monitoring results of these standpipes, the groundwater levels
generally range from 2.3mbgl to 8.1mbgl with an average of 5.1mbgl. The readings
were relatively stable throughout the six months of monitoring period. However,
discrepancies would be expected as this monitoring are located few kms away from
the CP101 and CP102 site.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 34 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 35 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
a d
Based on Stroud (1989) Based on Toha and Sengara (2009)
b e
Based on Bjerrum and Simons (1960) Based on Casagrande (1938)
c f
Based on Peck et al. (1974) Based on common correlation of c’ = 0.2 N (using average SPT-N of 30 for AC3 and 50 for TC)
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 36 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 37 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Vs (m/s)
100 150 200 250 300 350
0
10
Depth below Ground Level (mbgl)
15
20
25
30
35
40
Group A (Layer A thickness <=10m)
Group B (Layer A thickness = 10-15m)
45
Group C (Layer A thickness > 15m)
50
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 38 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
0.4
Spectral Acceleration (g)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0
Period (sec)
Figure 21 – Design Spectra for ODE case
1.0
Design Spectra - Group A
Design Spectra - Group B
0.9
Design Spectra - Group C
0.8
Spectral Acceleration (g)
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0
Period (sec)
Figure 22 – Design Spectra for MDE case
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 39 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
The value of ultimate bearing capacity, Qu, unit frictional resistance, fs, and unit base
resistance, qb, can be determined by following.
c) Ultimate Bearing Capacity
The ultimate geotechnical bearing capacity for compression pile is given by the
following equation:
Qu = Qsp + Qb
= fs As + qb Ab
where:
Qsp : is the ultimate positive shaft resistance
Qb : is the ultimate end bearing resistance
fs : is the average skin friction or adhesion per unit area of the shaft at
the condition of full mobilization of frictional resistance;
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 40 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
qb : is the ultimate value of the resistance per unit area of base due to the
shearing strength of the soil;
As : is the surface of the pile shaft;
Ab : is the plan area of the base.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 41 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Figure 23 – Bearing capacity factor (after Meyerhof) and shape factor (Meyerhof-
Skempton
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 42 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Based on the analysis, the ultimate bearing capacity of the soil block is significantly
higher than the sum of working load on the pile groups.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 43 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 44 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Figure 25 – Idealized variation of limiting resistance with depth (after Fleming et al,
2009)
12 𝐸𝑠 𝐵 4 𝐸𝑠
𝑘 ′ 𝑠 = 0.65 √
𝐸𝑓 𝐼𝑓 1 − 𝜇2
where,
k’s : modulus of subgrade reaction, in units of Es,
Es and Ef : modulus of soil and foundation structures, respectively; inconsistent
units,
B and If : foundation width and its moment of inertia based on cross section;
inconsistent units,
: Poisson ratio of soil.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 45 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
8. Design of Foundation
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 46 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
I C49 & C50 2 1.0 4335 - 6616 605 7478 1306 30.5
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 47 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
O C24, C26, C28 & C30 4 1.2 4916.1 - 8776 2229 10345.0 3832.3 31.0
O C20 & C22 4 1.2 5252.56 - 8686 2005 10225.2 3553.4 32.5
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 48 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
1
The negative values depicted in here refer to the tensile force in piles.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 49 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
SLS Stresses
Permissible Stresses Concrete 0.5fcu 20.000 Mpa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 Mpa
(from table 2, pg. 8, BS 5400-4: 1990, for stress due to bending)
Stress in
Stress in Concrete
Case Reinforcement
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima 5.725 OK 37.19 OK
Minima 1.087 OK 11.46 OK
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 50 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Moment in
Pile Cap
1 2
Lever arm
3 4
PIER
PILE
LOAD
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 51 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
The lateral or longitudinal deflections of entire structure have been depicted under
ODE conditions. The values are well acceptable under inter storey drift limits.
Lateral Displacement
No. of Pile at Pile Top (mm)
S. No. Column No(s). Piles / Diameter
Column (m) ODE
X Z
1 C1 1 1.0 37.374 39.558
2 C2 1 1.0 40.09 37.948
3 C3 1 1.0 39.253 39.732
4 C4 1 1.0 39.964 38.247
5 C5 1 1.0 39.345 40.119
6 C6 1 1.0 40.749 38.924
7 C7 1 1.0 40.228 40.431
8 C8 1 1.0 40.231 39.384
9 C9 1 1.0 39.446 40.656
10 C10 1 1.0 41.139 38.507
11 C11 1 1.0 40.357 39.569
12 C12 1 1.0 41.104 39.569
13 C13 1 1.0 39.394 37.215
14 C14 1 1.0 40.914 35.47
15 C15 1 1.0 40.205 37.455
16 C16 1 1.0 40.403 35.561
17 C17 1 1.0 37.729 36.554
18 C18 4 1.2 48.673 49.108
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 52 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 53 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
9. SETTLEMENT OF PILES
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 54 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
𝑅𝑠 = 𝑛𝜔
Where n is the number of piles and is an exponent which lies between 0.4 and 0.6
for most pile groups.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 55 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
C
C52, C54,
C58, C59, 1 1.0 1 ABH-4 2451 1 2 0 0
C60
C
C25, C27,
C29, C31 & 1 1.0 1 ABH-4 3645 2 5 0 0 D
C33
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 56 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
C7, C9 to
1 1.0 1 ABH-4 6356 5 11 0 0 G
C12 & C14
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 57 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
C24, C26,
4 1.2 1 ABH-4 4916 3 5 5 11 O
C28 & C30
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 58 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 59 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
10. CONCLUSION
All edge grid columns (along grids A & C) are founded on 1000/1200mm diameter
bored mono piles. Along grid B, viaduct-supporting columns are founded on groups
of four 1200mm diameter bored piles each, and the rest of the columns are founded
on 1200mm diameter bored mono piles.
The diameter and no. of piles to be provided for each column has been deciphered
based on the axial loads and the available pile capacities. The moments from
STAAD.Pro have been combined with these axial effects to design the
reinforcement for each pile using Oasys. The design calculations have been
attached with this report as appendices.
Factor of safety for axial bearing capacity of pile foundation has been designed to
comply with BS 8004 and Jakarta’s regulation of Structural and Geotechnical Design
Guidelines for Buildings (Dinas Penataan dan Pengawasan Bangunan DKI Jakarta,
2007).
Allowable lateral displacements for piles is designed be consistent with the function
and type of structure, the anticipated service life, and the consequences of
unacceptable displacements on the performance of the structure.
The anticipated total and differential pile settlement due to soil conditions are
designed to be less that those values considered in the design of the structure for
serviceability. There would be negligible consolidation settlement of the group since
the piles in groups are designed to be embedded in hard soils (SPT-N > 50), and no
soft to stiff compressible clay layer found in 3 times of pile group length below the
pile toe.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 60 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
11. REFERENCES
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 61 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
19) Stroud, M A (1989). The Standard Penetration Test – Its Application and
Interpretation, Proceedings of ICE Conference, Birmingham.
20) Toha, F.X. and Sengara, I.W. (2009). Consolidation Settlements of Deep Clay
Layers under High Rise Buildings in Jakarta, Development of Geotechnical
Engineering in Civil Construction, Bali, Indonesia, pp 22-36.
21) Tomlinson, M.J., (1994). Pile Design and Construction Practice, 4th Ed., Taylor
& Francis, Oxon.
22) Vesic, A. S. (1961a). Bending Beams Resting on Isotropic Elastic Solid, Jour.
Eng. Mech. Division, ASCE, vol. 87, EM 2, April, pp. 35-53.
23) Vesic, A. S. (1961b). Beams on Elastic Subgrade and the Winkler’s Hypothesis,
5th ICSMFE, vil 1, pp. 845-850.
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev C Page 62 of 62
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 LEBAK BULUS STATION FOUNDATION DESIGN
Appendix A
(Stock Yard)
AE-04
CO
NC
RE
AE-02
T E
Back Gate
1AD-1 Domestic Wastewater Treatment Shed
Car Parking
Motorbike Parking2 (Space for future)
1AD-8
Fence(Type1)
Workshop Main Building
AE-01 D-110 Fence(Type1)
Workshop
Emergency Exit Office
Building
Site Administration Car Garage1 Fuel Tank
Office
Car Parking Car Parking
9. -1
7. -2
9. -3
8. -4
6. -6
9. -5
6. 1
0. 2
+3 100
+3 110
+3 120
+2 B H
+3 B H
+3 B H
+3 B H
+2 E-0
+3 E-0
+3 B H
8
+3 B H
32
67
+3 130
+3 140
+3 150
3
29
92
50
12
51
36
83
4
51
1A
1A
1A
1A
41
E-
E-
E-
61
61
58
1A
A
1A
5.
4.
8.
E-
E-
E-
9.
5.
7.
NOTES:
Appendix B
10
15
Depth below Ground Level (mbgl)
20
25
30
35
40 E-120
1ABH4
1ABH5
45
Moderately Conservative Design Line
50
Oct-14
SOIL LATERAL SPRING CONSTANT - LEBAK BULUS STATION
Appendix C
Pile Schedule
Appendix D
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category: 1x1000 Load Category: A
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
BH Elevation : 38.4 mRL Concrete Grade, fcu : 40 N/mm2
GWT : 33.4 mRL Pile Diameter : 1.00 m
gw : 9.8 kN/m3 Pile Cut-off Level : 35.275 mRL
Pile Toe Level : 24.28 mRL
A) SKIN FRICTION
SPT-N Unit Skin Friction Shaft Friction Resistance Skin Friction
Soil Type Level from Level to Shaft Length
Average (0 or 1)
Static Seismic Static Seismic
(mRL) (mRL) (m) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
AC1 35.28 28.36 3.5 6.9 16 13 342 274 1
AC3 28.36 24.36 22 4.0 88 88 1,106 1,106 1
AC3 24.36 24.28 37 0.1 148 148 41 41 1
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 11.0 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe AC3 Unit End Bearing 2250 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 1,303 745 947 3,188 496 710 947
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static kN
ODE kN
MDE kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 745 kN Static (kN) 647 OK 0
ODE 947 kN ODE (kN) 790 OK 0
MDE 3,188 kN MDE (kN) 957 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category: 1x1000 Load Category: A
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 21.5 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TS Unit End Bearing 3000 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 60
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 2,949 2,508 3,298 7,303 1,672 2,473 3,298
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static kN
ODE kN
MDE kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 2,508 kN Static (kN) 2451 OK 0
ODE 3,298 kN ODE (kN) 2675 OK 0
MDE 7,303 kN MDE (kN) 2919 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 1x1000 Load Category: C
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 28.0 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TC Unit End Bearing 2250 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 4,165 4,323 5,718 10,344 2,882 4,288 5,718
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static kN
ODE kN
MDE kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 4,165 kN Static (kN) 3934 OK 0
ODE 5,718 kN ODE (kN) 4711 OK 0
MDE 10,344 kN MDE (kN) 5163 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 1x1000 Load Category: E
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
Load in the pile shaft Ws 3,934 kN
Load in the pile base Wb 0 kN
Cross-sectional area of the shaft As 0.79 m²
Cross-sectional area of the base Ab 0.79 m²
Elastic modulus of the pile (Short Term) Ep 2.80E+07 kN/m2
Elastic modulus of the pile (Long Term) Ep 1.40E+07 kN/m2
Deformation modulus of soil beneath pile base Eb 1.00E+05 kN/m2
Shaft length L 28.0 m
Pile width B 1.00 m
Poisson’s ratio of the soil n 0.3
Influence factor related to the ratio of L/B IP 0.8
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category :1x1000 Load Category: G
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
BH Elevation : 38.4 mRL Concrete Grade, fcu : 40 N/mm2
GWT : 33.4 mRL Pile Diameter : 1.00 m
gw : 9.8 kN/m3 Pile Cut-off Level : 35.275 mRL
Pile Toe Level : -2.23 mRL
A) SKIN FRICTION
SPT-N Unit Skin Friction Shaft Friction Resistance Skin Friction
Soil Type Level from Level to Shaft Length
Average (0 or 1)
Static Seismic Static Seismic
(mRL) (mRL) (m) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
AC1 35.28 28.36 3.5 6.9 16 13 342 274 1
AC3 28.36 24.36 22 4.0 88 88 1,106 1,106 1
AC3 24.36 22.36 37 2.0 148 148 930 930 1
AC3 22.36 21.91 47 0.4 188 188 266 266 1
AC3 21.91 16.86 16.5 5.1 66 66 1,047 1,047 1
TS 16.86 13.36 45.5 3.5 137 137 1,501 1,501 1
TC 13.36 12.36 48 1.0 192 192 603 603 1
TC 12.36 11.36 50 1.0 200 200 628 628 1
TS 11.36 9.36 50 2.0 150 150 942 942 1
TC 9.36 2.36 48.75 7.0 195 195 4,288 4,288 1
TS 2.36 -2.23 45.25 4.6 136 136 1,957 1,957 1
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 37.5 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TS Unit End Bearing 3000 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 60
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 6,387 6,805 9,028 15,899 4,537 6,771 9,028
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static kN
ODE kN
MDE kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 6,387 kN Static (kN) 6356 OK 0
ODE 9,028 kN ODE (kN) 8011 OK 0
MDE 15,899 kN MDE (kN) 8733 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 1x1000 Load Category: G
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) (1 − 2)
+2
= +
2 4
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 2x1000 Load Category: H
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
BH Elevation : 38.4 mRL Concrete Grade, fcu : 40 N/mm2
GWT : 33.4 mRL Pile Diameter : 1.00 m
gw : 9.8 kN/m3 Pile Cut-off Level : 35.275 mRL
Pile Toe Level : 5.28 mRL
A) SKIN FRICTION
SPT-N Unit Skin Friction Shaft Friction Resistance Skin Friction
Soil Type Level from Level to Shaft Length
Average (0 or 1)
Static Seismic Static Seismic
(mRL) (mRL) (m) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
AC1 35.28 28.36 3.5 6.9 16 13 342 274 1
AC3 28.36 24.36 22 4.0 88 88 1,106 1,106 1
AC3 24.36 22.36 37 2.0 148 148 930 930 1
AC3 22.36 21.91 47 0.4 188 188 266 266 1
AC3 21.91 16.86 16.5 5.1 66 66 1,047 1,047 1
TS 16.86 13.36 45.5 3.5 137 137 1,501 1,501 1
TC 13.36 12.36 48 1.0 192 192 603 603 1
TC 12.36 11.36 50 1.0 200 200 628 628 1
TS 11.36 9.36 50 2.0 150 150 942 942 1
TC 9.36 5.28 48.75 4.1 195 195 2,505 2,505 1
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 30.0 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TC Unit End Bearing 2250 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 4,655 4,935 6,535 11,569 3,290 4,901 6,535
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static 7,854 kN
ODE 7,854 kN
MDE 12,566 kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 4,655 kN Static (kN) 3587 OK 0
ODE 6,535 kN ODE (kN) 6478 OK 1178 OK
MDE 11,569 kN MDE (kN) 7507 OK 2037 OK
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 2x1000 Load Category: H
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
Rs=
Rs=√
Sg=Rs x Single Pile Settlement
Group Settlement Ratio Rs 1.41
Pile Group Settlement (Short Term) Sg(Short Term) 3.46 mm
Pile Group Settlement (Long Term) Sg(Long Term) 6.92 mm
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE BEARING CAPACITY Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category:2x1000 Load Category: I
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
BH Elevation : 38.4 mRL Concrete Grade, fcu : 40 N/mm2
GWT : 33.4 mRL Pile Diameter : 1.00 m
gw : 9.8 kN/m3 Pile Cut-off Level : 35.275 mRL
Pile Toe Level : 4.78 mRL
A) SKIN FRICTION
SPT-N Unit Skin Friction Shaft Friction Resistance Skin Friction
Soil Type Level from Level to Shaft Length
Average (0 or 1)
Static Seismic Static Seismic
(mRL) (mRL) (m) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
AC1 35.28 28.36 3.5 6.9 16 13 342 274 1
AC3 28.36 24.36 22 4.0 88 88 1,106 1,106 1
AC3 24.36 22.36 37 2.0 148 148 930 930 1
AC3 22.36 21.91 47 0.4 188 188 266 266 1
AC3 21.91 16.86 16.5 5.1 66 66 1,047 1,047 1
TS 16.86 13.36 45.5 3.5 137 137 1,501 1,501 1
TC 13.36 12.36 48 1.0 192 192 603 603 1
TC 12.36 11.36 50 1.0 200 200 628 628 1
TS 11.36 9.36 50 2.0 150 150 942 942 1
TC 9.36 4.78 48.75 4.6 195 195 2,811 2,811 1
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 30.5 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TC Unit End Bearing 2250 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 4,778 5,088 6,739 11,875 3,392 5,054 6,739
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static 7,854 kN
ODE 7,854 kN
MDE 12,566 kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 4,778 kN Static (kN) 4335 OK 0
ODE 6,739 kN ODE (kN) 6616 OK 1164 OK
MDE 11,875 kN MDE (kN) 7478 OK 1854 OK
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category: 2x1000 Load Category: I
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) (1 − 2)
+2
= +
2 4
Rs=
Rs=√
Sg=Rs x Single Pile Settlement
Group Settlement Ratio Rs 1.41
Pile Group Settlement (Short Term) Sg(Short Term) 4.25 mm
Pile Group Settlement (Long Term) Sg(Long Term) 8.50 mm
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE BEARING CAPACITY Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 4x1000 Load Category: J
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
BH Elevation : 38.4 mRL Concrete Grade, fcu : 40 N/mm2
GWT : 33.4 mRL Pile Diameter : 1.00 m
gw : 9.8 kN/m3 Pile Cut-off Level : 35.275 mRL
Pile Toe Level : 5.28 mRL
A) SKIN FRICTION
SPT-N Unit Skin Friction Shaft Friction Resistance Skin Friction
Soil Type Level from Level to Shaft Length
Average (0 or 1)
Static Seismic Static Seismic
(mRL) (mRL) (m) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
AC1 35.28 28.36 3.5 6.9 16 13 342 274 1
AC3 28.36 24.36 22 4.0 88 88 1,106 1,106 1
AC3 24.36 22.36 37 2.0 148 148 930 930 1
AC3 22.36 21.91 47 0.4 188 188 266 266 1
AC3 21.91 16.86 16.5 5.1 66 66 1,047 1,047 1
TS 16.86 13.36 45.5 3.5 137 137 1,501 1,501 1
TC 13.36 12.36 48 1.0 192 192 603 603 1
TC 12.36 11.36 50 1.0 200 200 628 628 1
TS 11.36 9.36 50 2.0 150 150 942 942 1
TC 9.36 5.28 48.75 4.1 195 195 2,505 2,505 1
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 30.0 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TC Unit End Bearing 2250 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 4,655 4,935 6,535 11,569 3,290 4,901 6,535
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static 7,854 kN
ODE 7,854 kN
MDE 12,566 kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 4,655 kN Static (kN) 1914 OK 0
ODE 6,535 kN ODE (kN) 6484 OK 4301 OK
MDE 11,569 kN MDE (kN) 8108 OK 5925 OK
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 4x1000 Load Category: J
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
Rs=
Rs=√
Sg=Rs x Single Pile Settlement
Group Settlement Ratio Rs 2.00
Pile Group Settlement (Short Term) Sg(Short Term) 2.61 mm
Pile Group Settlement (Long Term) Sg(Long Term) 5.22 mm
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE BEARING CAPACITY Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 28.0 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TC Unit End Bearing 2250 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 1.13 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 5,249 5,288 6,999 13,043 3,526 5,249 6,999
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static kN
ODE kN
MDE kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 5,249 kN Static (kN) 5238 OK 0
ODE 6,999 kN ODE (kN) 4506 OK 0
MDE 13,043 kN MDE (kN) 6319 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 1x1200 Load Category: K
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 31.5 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TC Unit End Bearing 2250 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 1.13 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 6,278 6,575 8,714 15,616 4,383 6,536 8,714
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static 11,310 kN
ODE 11,310 kN
MDE 18,096 kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 6,278 kN Static (kN) 6273 OK 0
ODE 8,714 kN ODE (kN) 6326 OK 0
MDE 15,616 kN MDE (kN) 7558 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category : 1x1200 Load Category: L
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category: 1x1200 Load Category: M
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
BH Elevation : 38.4 mRL Concrete Grade, fcu : 40 N/mm2
GWT : 33.4 mRL Pile Diameter : 1.20 m
gw : 9.8 kN/m3 Pile Cut-off Level : 34.975 mRL
Pile Toe Level : 1.98 mRL
A) SKIN FRICTION
SPT-N Unit Skin Friction Shaft Friction Resistance Skin Friction
Soil Type Level from Level to Shaft Length
Average (0 or 1)
Static Seismic Static Seismic
(mRL) (mRL) (m) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
AC1 34.98 28.36 3.5 6.6 16 13 393 314 1
AC3 28.36 24.36 22 4.0 88 88 1,327 1,327 1
AC3 24.36 22.36 37 2.0 148 148 1,116 1,116 1
AC3 22.36 21.91 47 0.4 188 188 319 319 1
AC3 21.91 16.86 16.5 5.1 66 66 1,257 1,257 1
TS 16.86 13.36 45.5 3.5 137 137 1,801 1,801 1
TC 13.36 12.36 48 1.0 192 192 724 724 1
TC 12.36 11.36 50 1.0 200 200 754 754 1
TS 11.36 9.36 50 2.0 150 150 1,131 1,131 1
TC 9.36 2.36 48.75 7.0 195 195 5,146 5,146 1
TS 2.36 1.98 45.25 0.4 136 136 199 199 1
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 33.0 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TS Unit End Bearing 3000 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 1.13 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 60
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 7,023 7,083 9,391 17,480 4,722 7,044 9,391
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static 11,310 kN
ODE 11,310 kN
MDE 18,096 kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 7,023 kN Static (kN) 7010 OK 0
ODE 9,391 kN ODE (kN) 8723 OK 0
MDE 17,480 kN MDE (kN) 9389 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category: 1x1200 Load Category: M
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category:2x1200 Load Category: N
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
BH Elevation : 38.4 mRL Concrete Grade, fcu : 40 N/mm2
GWT : 33.4 mRL Pile Diameter : 1.20 m
gw : 9.8 kN/m3 Pile Cut-off Level : 34.975 mRL
Pile Toe Level : 7.98 mRL
A) SKIN FRICTION
SPT-N Unit Skin Friction Shaft Friction Resistance Skin Friction
Soil Type Level from Level to Shaft Length
Average (0 or 1)
Static Seismic Static Seismic
(mRL) (mRL) (m) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
AC1 34.98 28.36 3.5 6.6 16 13 393 314 1
AC3 28.36 24.36 22 4.0 88 88 1,327 1,327 1
AC3 24.36 22.36 37 2.0 148 148 1,116 1,116 1
AC3 22.36 21.91 47 0.4 188 188 319 319 1
AC3 21.91 16.86 16.5 5.1 66 66 1,257 1,257 1
TS 16.86 13.36 45.5 3.5 137 137 1,801 1,801 1
TC 13.36 12.36 48 1.0 192 192 724 724 1
TC 12.36 11.36 50 1.0 200 200 754 754 1
TS 11.36 9.36 50 2.0 150 150 1,131 1,131 1
TC 9.36 7.98 48.75 1.4 195 195 1,021 1,021 1
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 27.0 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TC Unit End Bearing 2250 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 50 Area of Toe 1.13 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 4,955 4,921 6,509 12,308 3,281 4,882 6,509
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static 11,310 kN
ODE 11,310 kN
MDE 18,096 kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 4,921 kN Static (kN) 2645 OK 0
ODE 6,509 kN ODE (kN) 6357 OK 0
MDE 12,308 kN MDE (kN) 7666 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : KYKQ
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 14-Apr-2015
Site Location : Lebak Bulus station Pile Group Category: 2x1200 Load Category: N
BH Ref. : 1 ABH-4 Pile Type : Bored Pile
( ) 2
+2 (1 − )
= +
2 4
Rs=
Rs=√
Sg=Rs x Single Pile Settlement
Group Settlement Ratio Rs 1.41
Pile Group Settlement (Short Term) Sg(Short Term) 1.59 mm
Pile Group Settlement (Long Term) Sg(Long Term) 3.19 mm
Average Undrained Shear Strength over Pile Embedment Depth(Static) Su(shaft)Static 984.2
Average Undrained Shear Strength over Pile Embedment Depth(Earthquake) Su(shaft)eq 976.3
Undrained Shear Strength at Pile Base Su(base) 225
Bearing Capacity factor Nc 9 3f
Shape Factor s 1.05
Length of planned group piles Lg 4.8
Width of planned group piles Bg 1.2
D= 27.0 m
Static B 1.2 m
Q = [2 x D x (Bg + Lg) x Su(shaft) ]+ [1.3Su(base) s Nc BL] D/B 23
= 334,797 kN >5290 kN OK! L/B 4
Earthquake
Q = [2 x D x (Bg + Lg) x Su(shaft) ]+ [1.3Su(base) s Nc BL]
= 332,253 kN >15332 kN OK!
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 LEBAK BULUS STATION FOUNDATION DESIGN
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Table 1
Alternative Codes to be
No. Item Code (specified)
Used
1 Viaducts
a Train Loads ODS ODS
BD37/01, BD60/04,
b Other Loads Japanese Standards
BS6779
c Load Factors Japanese Standards BD37/01
BS5400 Part 4, Part 7
d Concrete Member Design Japanese Standards
and Part 8
e Steel Member Design Japanese Standards BS5400 Part 3 and Part 6
2 Stations
a Loadings SNI 03-1727-1989 BS6339
Load Factors and Concrete
b SNI 03-2847-2002 BS8110
Member Design
Load Factors and Steel
c SNI 03-1729-2002 BS 5950
Member design
3 Depot
a Loadings SNI 03-1727-1989 BS6339
Load Factors and Concrete
b SNI 03-2847-2002 BS8110
Member Design
Load Factors and Steel
c SNI 03-1729-2002 BS 5950
Member design
4 Seismic
a Earthquake response SNI 03-2833-2008 PTLAPI ITB report
b Earthquake response SNI 03-1726-2002 PTLAPI ITB report
Structural response and
c DSRSC-SD Eurocode 8
design of structures
d Level 1 displacement limits DSRSC-DL DSRSC-DL
5 Others
Foundations Indonesian Code BS 8004
Retaining Walls Indonesian Code BS 8002 and BS 8006
BD37/01 Design Manual for Roads and Bridges Loads for Highway Bridges (UK
Department of Transport enactment of BS5400 Part 2)
BS6399 Loading for Buildings (only where loads are not covered by SNI
documents)
Appendix I
A1
NOTES:
A1
NOTES:
A1
2 IMPOSED DEAD LOAD ( FLOOR FINISH 100 MM THK. ) THIS IMPOSED LOAD IS BASED ON:-
S.N. TITLE DRAWING REV. DATE REMARKS
LOAD AREA NO.
2.4 kN/m² 3518m² LEBAK BULUS STATION
1 PLATFORM CP101-CP102-SK-032 R0 MAY;2012
OVERALL LAYOUT
LEGEND LOADS AREA
4 kN/m² 41.52 m²
2 CLAUSE NO-5.2(TABLE 17) OF DESIGN MANUAL
5 kN/m² 3518.92 m²
NOTES:
A1
2 IMPOSED DEAD LOAD ( FLOOR FINISH 100 MM THK. ) THIS IMPOSED LOAD IS BASED ON:-
S.N. TITLE DRAWING REV. DATE REMARKS
LOAD AREA NO.
2.4 kN/m² 3960m² LEBAK BULUS STATION
1 UPPER CONCOURSE CP101-CP102-SK-038 R0 MAY;2012
OVERALL LAYOUT
LEGEND LOADS AREA
4 kN/m² 41.52 m²
2 CLAUSE NO-5.2(TABLE 17) OF DESIGN MANUAL
5 kN/m² 3518.92 m²
NOTES:
Appendix J
Design of Pile
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 26066 1006 1DL25004
+ 1SIDL +3933.16
1CL + 1PLA -13.976
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-3.826
+ 1.1TLB0.285
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
1.325 69.121
Min Fx 26066 1001 1DL25004
+ 1SIDL 3330.839
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.946
1.1TLA + -3.356
1.1BTA 0.33 -17.498 -47.582
Max Fy 23949 1005 1DL22687
+ 1SIDL 3732.305
+ 1CL + 1PLA +21.526
1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.162
+ 1.1TLB
-0.309
+ 1.1BTA-22.023
+ 1.1BTB -33.385
Min Fy 26095 1006 1DL25003
+ 1SIDL +3933.16
1CL + 1PLA -37.804
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-7.303
+ 1.1TLB0.285
- 1.1BTA -19.518
1.1BTB -18.044
Max Fz 23949 1006 1DL22687
+ 1SIDL 3892.151
+ 1CL + 1PLA -32.376
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA5.29
+ 1.1TLB
-0.614
- 1.1BTA -26.099
- 1.1BTB 2.639
Min Fz 26095 1001 1DL25003
+ 1SIDL 3330.839
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.383
1.1TLA + -9.214
1.1BTA 0.33 3.686 -48.55
Max Mx 26066 1001 1DL25004
+ 1SIDL 3330.839
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.946
1.1TLA + -3.356
1.1BTA 0.33 -17.498 -47.582
Min Mx 23920 1006 1DL22688
+ 1SIDL 3892.151
+ 1CL + 1PLA -10.698
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.612
+ 1.1TLB
-0.614
- 1.1BTA - -11.91
1.1BTB 75.759
Max My 26095 1004 1DL25003
+ 1SIDL 3919.824
+ 1CL + 1PLB -24.674
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-6.194 0.245 25.655 -27.804
Min My 23949 1002 1DL22687
+ 1SIDL 3914.903
+ 1CL + 1PLA -19.068
+ 1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
2.601 -0.5 -30.685 -6.927
Max Mz 26069 1006 1DL25008
+ 1SIDL +3933.16
1CL + 1PLA +-0.568
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.579
+ 1.1TLB0.285
- 1.1BTA - -9.218
1.1BTB 96.191
Min Mz 26066 1005 1DL25005
+ 1SIDL 3755.483
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
1.52+ 1.1TLA
-3.854
+ 1.1TLB0.256
+ 1.1BTA +-8.151
1.1BTB -86.917
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 1144 993.2 1120 0.887 OK
Minima 4755 67.19 1790 0.038 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 26075 1006 1DL25013
+ 1SIDL +3933.16
1CL + 1PLA +10.738
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.163
+ 1.1TLB0.285
- 1.1BTA -10.196
- 1.1BTB 66.294
Min Fx 26075 1001 1DL25013
+ 1SIDL 3330.839
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -3.19
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
2.657 0.33 -16.273 -10.437
Max Fy 26075 1006 1DL25013
+ 1SIDL +3933.16
1CL + 1PLA +10.738
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.163
+ 1.1TLB0.285
- 1.1BTA -10.196
- 1.1BTB 66.294
Min Fy 23929 1005 1DL22697
+ 1SIDL 3732.305
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-8.596
1PLB + 1.1TLA
0.579
+ 1.1TLB
-0.309
+ 1.1BTA +0.375
1.1BTB -44.855
Max Fz 26075 1001 1DL25013
+ 1SIDL 3330.839
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -3.19
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
2.657 0.33 -16.273 -10.437
Min Fz 23931 1003 1DL22699
+ 1SIDL 3333.826
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-3.001
1.1TLB + -0.712
1.1BTB -0.446 3.853 -10.128
Max Mx 26075 1001 1DL25013
+ 1SIDL 3330.839
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -3.19
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
2.657 0.33 -16.273 -10.437
Min Mx 23929 1006 1DL22697
+ 1SIDL 3892.151
+ 1CL + 1PLA +10.224
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.163
+ 1.1TLB
-0.614
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
5.439 59.72
Max My 23929 1006 1DL22697
+ 1SIDL 3892.151
+ 1CL + 1PLA +10.224
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.163
+ 1.1TLB
-0.614
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
5.439 59.72
Min My 26075 1001 1DL25013
+ 1SIDL 3330.839
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -3.19
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
2.657 0.33 -16.273 -10.437
Max Mz 26075 1006 1DL25013
+ 1SIDL +3933.16
1CL + 1PLA +10.738
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.163
+ 1.1TLB0.285
- 1.1BTA -10.196
- 1.1BTB 66.294
Min Mz 23929 1005 1DL22697
+ 1SIDL 3732.305
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-8.596
1PLB + 1.1TLA
0.579
+ 1.1TLB
-0.309
+ 1.1BTA +0.375
1.1BTB -44.855
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 1270.63 828.339
Skin Friction (kN) 0.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 2784 971.9 1318 0.737 OK
Minima 5163 530.6 1660 0.320 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 65.44 OK
Minima -23.27 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.7645 m
Hence de = 0.743 m and dv = 0.669 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 626 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 2784 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 5104 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0026 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.381 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 626 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 24085 1002 1DL22853
+ 1SIDL 5801.723
+ 1CL + 1PLA -11.882
+ 1.1TLA - 23.606
1.1BTA -0.114 -60.978 26.038
Min Fx 24052 1004 1DL22820
+ 1SIDL 4207.253
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-2.283
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
8.134 -0.104 -13.607 43.583
Max Fy 24081 1005 1DL22819
+ 1SIDL +4956.44
1CL + 1PLA +34.647
1PLB + 1.1TLA
18.461
+ 1.1TLB0.099
+ 1.1BTA-81.783
+ 1.1BTB 11.641
Min Fy 24114 1006 1DL22852
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA -43.703
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
39.371
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA-152.798
- 1.1BTB -40.332
Max Fz 24114 1006 1DL22852
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA -43.703
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
39.371
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA-152.798
- 1.1BTB -40.332
Min Fz 24097 1006 1DL22865
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA +10.213
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.911
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA -33.068
1.1BTB 39.719
Max Mx 24085 1001 1DL22853
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5779.7
+ 1PLA +-0.526
1.1TLA + 23.039
1.1BTA 0.246 -62.849 -46.158
Min Mx 24052 1006 1DL22820
+ 1SIDL +4947.83
1CL + 1PLA +-7.098
1PLB + 1.1TLA
12.427
+ 1.1TLB
-0.278
- 1.1BTA -29.921
- 1.1BTB 80.934
Max My 24092 1006 1DL22861
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 8.153
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.903
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA -48.584
1.1BTB 83.787
Min My 24114 1002 1DL22852
+ 1SIDL 5801.723
+ 1CL + 1PLA -27.214
+ 1.1TLA - 37.108
1.1BTA -0.114 -158.427 -38.9
Max Mz 24088 1006 1DL22857
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.441
1PLB + 1.1TLA
12.871
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA -21.916
1.1BTB 99.827
Min Mz 24055 1005 1DL22824
+ 1SIDL +4956.44
1CL + 1PLA + 0.072
1PLB + 1.1TLA
6.964
+ 1.1TLB0.099
+ 1.1BTA +4.356
1.1BTB -91.018
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 1859 916.8 1097 0.836 OK
Minima 2025 182 1140 0.160 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 24092 1002 1DL22860
+ 1SIDL 5801.723
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 3.983
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
2.938 -0.114 39.524 52.975
Min Fx 24059 1004 1DL22827
+ 1SIDL 4207.253
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 4.479
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
0.299 -0.104 17.938 32.676
Max Fy 24095 1006 1DL22863
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA +11.441
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-4.935
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA -43.662
1.1BTB 62.161
Min Fy 24061 1005 1DL22829
+ 1SIDL +4956.44
1CL + 1PLA -10.119
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.096
+ 1.1TLB0.099
+ 1.1BTA +20.494
1.1BTB -61.555
Max Fz 24092 1001 1DL22860
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5779.7
+ 1PLA +-4.378
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
3.188 0.246 36.63 -25.243
Min Fz 24097 1006 1DL22865
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA +10.213
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.911
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA -33.068
1.1BTB 39.719
Max Mx 24092 1001 1DL22860
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5779.7
+ 1PLA +-4.378
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
3.188 0.246 36.63 -25.243
Min Mx 24059 1006 1DL22827
+ 1SIDL +4947.83
1CL + 1PLA + 8.673
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.337
+ 1.1TLB
-0.278
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
22.08 69.769
Max My 24092 1006 1DL22861
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 8.153
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.903
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA -48.584
1.1BTB 83.787
Min My 28603 1006 1DL27588
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-0.536
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.305
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA - -2.004
1.1BTB -4.473
Max Mz 24092 1006 1DL22860
+ 1SIDL 5766.476
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 8.153
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.903
+ 1.1TLB
-0.226
- 1.1BTA -46.681
1.1BTB 91.94
Min Mz 24059 1005 1DL22827
+ 1SIDL +4956.44
1CL + 1PLA +-8.079
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.697
+ 1.1TLB0.099
+ 1.1BTA +18.742
1.1BTB -79.201
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 2278.30 1858.508
Skin Friction (kN) 0.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 2025 840.7 1140 0.738 OK
Minima 7240 458.1 1712 0.268 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 89.55 OK
Minima -23.37 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.766 m
Hence de = 0.744 m and dv = 0.669 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 648 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 5030 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 3217 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0016 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.240 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 648 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30628 1001 1DL29632
+ 1SIDL 6355.061
+ 1CL + 1PLA +27.848
1.1TLA + 38.207
1.1BTA 0.886 -71.303 2.367
Min Fx 24151 1004 1DL22919
+ 1SIDL 4074.471
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 4.921
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.586 1.095 9.279 54.791
Max Fy 30645 1005 1DL29631
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA +70.225
1PLB + 1.1TLA
65.949
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA-231.27
+ 1.1BTB 137.57
Min Fy 24147 1006 1DL22885
+ 1SIDL 5545.278
+ 1CL + 1PLA -46.305
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
21.259
+ 1.1TLB
-0.721
- 1.1BTA -85.023
- 1.1BTB -50.03
Max Fz 30645 1005 1DL29631
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA +70.225
1PLB + 1.1TLA
65.949
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA-231.27
+ 1.1BTB 137.57
Min Fz 30640 1005 1DL29644
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA -14.355
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-10.599
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA +55.965
1.1BTB -62.128
Max Mx 24217 1005 1DL22985
+ 1SIDL 5785.763
+ 1CL + 1PLA +13.818
1PLB + 1.1TLA5.27
+ 1.1TLB2.575
+ 1.1BTA-13.141
+ 1.1BTB -67.501
Min Mx 24118 1006 1DL22886
+ 1SIDL 5545.278
+ 1CL + 1PLA -19.081
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
13.12
+ 1.1TLB
-0.721
- 1.1BTA - -29.68
1.1BTB 59.095
Max My 30635 1005 1DL29640
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA +-7.324
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.228
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA +87.079
1.1BTB -117.829
Min My 30645 1001 1DL29631
+ 1SIDL 6355.061
+ 1CL + 1PLA +54.245
1.1TLA + 64.183
1.1BTA 0.886 -236.699 136.813
Max Mz 30645 1005 1DL29631
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA +70.225
1PLB + 1.1TLA
65.949
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA-231.27
+ 1.1BTB 137.57
Min Mz 30633 1005 1DL29638
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA + 2.085
1PLB + 1.1TLA
11.309
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA +77.292
1.1BTB -125.767
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 2193 1010 1182 0.855 OK
Minima 6948 327.8 1721 0.191 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Cipete Raya Prepared Nikhil
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Cipete Raya Prepared Nikhil
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30635 1001 1DL29639
+ 1SIDL 6355.061
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.232
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
2.118 0.886 79.944 -87.195
Min Fx 24158 1004 1DL22926
+ 1SIDL 4074.471
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 4.663
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.82 1.095 3.547 16.297
Max Fy 24128 1006 1DL22896
+ 1SIDL 5545.278
+ 1CL + 1PLA +11.786
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.548
+ 1.1TLB
-0.721
- 1.1BTA -23.309
1.1BTB 65.09
Min Fy 30638 1005 1DL29642
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA -15.028
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-9.404
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA +75.75
1.1BTB -92.177
Max Fz 24496 1001 1DL23274
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5499.3
+ 1PLA +-3.974
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
3.108 0.39 38.048 -49.083
Min Fz 30640 1005 1DL29644
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA -14.355
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-10.599
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA +55.965
1.1BTB -62.128
Max Mx 24224 1005 1DL22992
+ 1SIDL 5785.763
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-8.215
1PLB + 1.1TLA0.61
+ 1.1TLB2.575
+ 1.1BTA +9.098
1.1BTB -83.31
Min Mx 24125 1006 1DL22893
+ 1SIDL 5545.278
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
8.06+ 1.1TLA
1.227
+ 1.1TLB
-0.721
- 1.1BTA -24.424
1.1BTB 95.15
Max My 30635 1005 1DL29640
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA +-7.324
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.228
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA +87.079
1.1BTB -117.829
Min My 24158 1002 1DL22926
+ 1SIDL 4438.199
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 4.747
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
1.31 1.232 -5.219 12.328
Max Mz 24125 1006 1DL22893
+ 1SIDL 5545.278
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
8.06+ 1.1TLA
1.227
+ 1.1TLB
-0.721
- 1.1BTA -24.424
1.1BTB 95.15
Min Mz 30635 1005 1DL29639
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
6320.8
+ 1PLA +-7.324
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.228
+ 1.1TLB0.786
+ 1.1BTA +85.851
1.1BTB -125.153
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 1480.14 770.546
Skin Friction (kN) 0.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 1979 856.7 1129 0.759 OK
Minima 8732 420.1 1612 0.261 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 98.67 OK
Minima -19.23 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.766 m
Hence de = 0.744 m and dv = 0.669 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 695 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 6194 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 3217 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0016 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.240 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 695 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Cipete Raya Prepared Nikhil
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 26099 1003 1DL25037
+ 1SIDL +5350.138
1CL + 1PLB + 3.953
1.1TLB + -12.528
1.1BTB -0.25 25.018 -36.227
Min Fx 26132 1001 1DL25070
+ 1SIDL +4320.361
1CL + 1PLA + 7.511
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
-8.058 0.033 -8.421 -29.766
Max Fy 26161 1005 1DL25069
+ 1SIDL +5053.658
1CL + 1PLA +35.103
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-22.037
+ 1.1TLB-0.134
+ 1.1BTA +65.178
1.1BTB 14.587
Min Fy 24048 1006 1DL22786
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5154.8
+ 1PLA -41.159
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
13.758
+ 1.1TLB-0.436
- 1.1BTA --59.163
1.1BTB -30.027
Max Fz 23982 1006 1DL22720
+ 1SIDL +5135.625
1CL + 1PLA +-36.19
1PLB + 1.1TLA
19.592
+ 1.1TLB-0.324
- 1.1BTA --78.593
1.1BTB -11.474
Min Fz 26128 1005 1DL25036
+ 1SIDL + 5318.19
1CL + 1PLA +29.211
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-24.027
+ 1.1TLB-0.046
+ 1.1BTA +72.711
1.1BTB -6.284
Max Mx 26099 1001 1DL25037
+ 1SIDL +4679.463
1CL + 1PLA + 1.1TLA
4.37 + 1.1BTA
-6.756 0.12 -11.194 -34.998
Min Mx 24019 1006 1DL22787
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5154.8
+ 1PLA -15.946
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
8.782
+ 1.1TLB-0.436
- 1.1BTA --22.996
1.1BTB 65.749
Max My 26128 1004 1DL25036
+ 1SIDL +5331.512
1CL + 1PLB +-19.131
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-21.17 -0.065 79.41 -8.253
Min My 23982 1002 1DL22720
+ 1SIDL +5190.264
1CL + 1PLA -19.998
+ 1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
17.278 -0.225 -84.562 -10.707
Max Mz 24022 1006 1DL22791
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5154.8
+ 1PLA +-1.569
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.026
+ 1.1TLB-0.436
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
4.29 98.662
Min Mz 26135 1005 1DL25074
+ 1SIDL +5053.658
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.329+ 1.1TLA-5.34
+ 1.1TLB-0.134
+ 1.1BTA +-24.151
1.1BTB -90.585
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 2179 1005 1178 0.853 OK
Minima 2416 10.29 1236 0.008 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.766 m
Hence de = 0.744 m and dv = 0.669 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 654 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 4478 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 3217 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = As = 0.0016 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.240 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 654 kN
Shear stress (vv = Vu /(bv . dv) = 977.27 kN/m2
Grade of concrete = C40
As per Cl. 5.3.3.2, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, ultimate shear stress in concrete,
vc = 0.27/ m (100As/(bd))1/3 (fcu)1/3 (where m = 1.25) = 0.459 Mpa
= 459 kN/m2
Depth Factor, s = (500/d)1/4 or 0.70, whichever is greater = 0.930
Allowable shear stress in concrete, s vc = 426.930 kN/m2
Gross area of concrete section, Ac 0.785 m2
Increase in shear stress (1 + 0.05N/Ac) is done as per Cl. 5.5.6, pg. 29, BS 5400-4: 1990,
n = (1 + 0.05N /Ac) = 1.29
Modified shear strength of concrete (n s vc ) = 548.63 kN/m2
Shear to be carried by stirrups, Vus = Vu - (n s vc ) bv dv = 286.95 kN
As per Table 7, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, minimum shear to be carried by stirrups,
Vus,min = 0.4 bv dv = 267.78 kN
Dia of stirrup = 13 mm
No. of legs = 2
As per Table 7, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, spacing required,
sv = 0.87 fyv Asv d / Vus = 210 mm
Provided spacing 200 mm
OK
Shear reinforcement 13mm dia @ 200mm c/c
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared Raghav
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32091 1005 1DL31120
+ 1SIDL 3587.408
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 7.622
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.693
+ 1.1TLB
-0.017
+ 1.1BTA-56.097
+ 1.1BTB -76.067
Min Fx 32122 1001 1DL31152
+ 1SIDL 1902.335
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -1.26
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
28.81 0.11 -164.899 -45.925
Max Fy 32108 1005 1DL31119
+ 1SIDL 3587.408
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 26.39
1PLB + 1.1TLA2.72
+ 1.1TLB
-0.017
+ 1.1BTA-68.005
+ 1.1BTB -17.787
Min Fy 32108 1006 1DL31119
+ 1SIDL 3576.768
+ 1CL + 1PLA -34.714
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.314
+ 1.1TLB0.048
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
-76.3 -2.264
Max Fz 32139 1004 1DL31151
+ 1SIDL +2224.51
1CL + 1PLB +-8.508
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
40.987 0.025 -308.647 37.442
Min Fz 32137 1004 1DL31167
+ 1SIDL +2224.51
1CL + 1PLB + 1.419
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-4.074 0.025 22.403 0.712
Max Mx 32122 1001 1DL31152
+ 1SIDL 1902.335
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -1.26
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
28.81 0.11 -164.899 -45.925
Min Mx 32122 1002 1DL31152
+ 1SIDL 1918.704
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -0.33
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
30.32 -0.098 -167.023 53.41
Max My 32132 1004 1DL31163
+ 1SIDL +2224.51
1CL + 1PLB + 4.317
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
1.762 0.025 31.369 12.584
Min My 32139 1004 1DL31151
+ 1SIDL +2224.51
1CL + 1PLB +-8.508
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
40.987 0.025 -308.647 37.442
Max Mz 32122 1006 1DL31152
+ 1SIDL 2181.412
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.232
1PLB + 1.1TLA
32.933
+ 1.1TLB
-0.077
- 1.1BTA-185.467
- 1.1BTB 103.2
Min Mz 32122 1005 1DL31152
+ 1SIDL 2164.737
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-1.634
1PLB + 1.1TLA
31.39
+ 1.1TLB0.083
+ 1.1BTA-183.314
+ 1.1BTB -96.222
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -1843 2300 3339 0.689 OK
Minima 5462 474.1 4056 0.117 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared Raghav
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared Raghav
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32106 1005 1DL31135
+ 1SIDL 3587.408
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.845
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.002
+ 1.1TLB
-0.017
+ 1.1BTA +3.331
1.1BTB -6.024
Min Fx 32137 1001 1DL31167
+ 1SIDL 1902.335
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-0.851
1.1TLA + -3.035
1.1BTA 0.11 18.087 0.39
Max Fy 32106 1006 1DL31135
+ 1SIDL 3576.768
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 4.913
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.323
+ 1.1TLB0.048
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
4.312 8.919
Min Fy 32106 1005 1DL31135
+ 1SIDL 3587.408
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.845
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.002
+ 1.1TLB
-0.017
+ 1.1BTA +3.331
1.1BTB -6.024
Max Fz 32150 1004 1DL31179
+ 1SIDL +2224.51
1CL + 1PLB +-0.264
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
0.19 0.025 -0.36 -0.407
Min Fz 32137 1004 1DL31167
+ 1SIDL +2224.51
1CL + 1PLB + 1.419
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-4.074 0.025 22.403 0.712
Max Mx 32137 1001 1DL31167
+ 1SIDL 1902.335
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-0.851
1.1TLA + -3.035
1.1BTA 0.11 18.087 0.39
Min Mx 32137 1002 1DL31167
+ 1SIDL 1918.704
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.44
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
-3.36 -0.098 19.103 0.78
Max My 32137 1004 1DL31167
+ 1SIDL +2224.51
1CL + 1PLB + 1.419
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-4.074 0.025 22.403 0.712
Min My 32148 1004 1DL31178
+ 1SIDL +2224.51
1CL + 1PLB +-0.433
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.236 0.025 -0.417 -0.77
Max Mz 32106 1006 1DL31135
+ 1SIDL 3576.768
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 4.913
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.323
+ 1.1TLB0.048
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
4.312 8.919
Min Mz 32106 1005 1DL31135
+ 1SIDL 3587.408
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.845
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.002
+ 1.1TLB
-0.017
+ 1.1BTA +3.331
1.1BTB -6.024
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -1178.67 -2037.23
Skin Friction (kN) 1724.67
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 -312.56
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -196.7 219.4 442.4 0.496 OK
Minima 3690 68.64 1470 0.047 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 50.86 OK
Minima -8.874 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.756 m
Hence de = 0.741 m and dv = 0.667 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 639 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 5462 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 32572 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0163 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 2.443 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 639 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared Raghav
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32162 1003 1DL31198
+ 1SIDL 3490.837
+ 1CL + 1PLB +21.881
1.1TLB + -32.33
1.1BTB -0.068 188.782 11.253
Min Fx 32193 1002 1DL31229
+ 1SIDL 1798.021
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-5.411
1.1TLA - -58.166
1.1BTA -0.014 396.38 40.529
Max Fy 32162 1005 1DL24889
+ 1SIDL 3404.799
+ 1CL + 1PLA +39.583
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-38.548
+ 1.1TLB0.012
+ 1.1BTA239.677
+ 1.1BTB 44.685
Min Fy 32162 1006 1DL24889
+ 1SIDL 3415.452
+ 1CL + 1PLA -31.094
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-35.932
+ 1.1TLB
-0.059
- 1.1BTA229.582
- 1.1BTB -9.302
Max Fz 32208 1005 1DL31245
+ 1SIDL 2052.052
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.281
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.134
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA-39.545
+ 1.1BTB -3.41
Min Fz 32193 1005 1DL31229
+ 1SIDL 2052.051
+ 1CL + 1PLA +15.906
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-67.616
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA464.715
+ 1.1BTB -64.206
Max Mx 32162 1001 1DL24889
+ 1SIDL 2906.292
+ 1CL + 1PLA +21.755
1.1TLA + -35.467
1.1BTA 0.103 211.44 30.859
Min Mx 32193 1003 1DL31229
+ 1SIDL 2041.957
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 8.792
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
-61.6 -0.12 444.479 -29.398
Max My 32193 1005 1DL31229
+ 1SIDL 2052.051
+ 1CL + 1PLA +15.906
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-67.616
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA464.715
+ 1.1BTB -64.206
Min My 32203 1005 1DL31241
+ 1SIDL 2052.052
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-8.347
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.481
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA-57.245
+ 1.1BTB -27.291
Max Mz 32194 1006 1DL31231
+ 1SIDL 2037.594
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 2.954
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-49.068
+ 1.1TLB0.025
- 1.1BTA218.662
- 1.1BTB 100.746
Min Mz 32194 1005 1DL31231
+ 1SIDL 2052.052
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-1.321
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-50.497
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA220.667
+ 1.1BTB -100.159
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -863.9 559.8 2856 0.196 OK
Minima 4273 260.4 3480 0.075 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared Raghava
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.020 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared Raghava
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32178 1003 1DL31214
+ 1SIDL 3490.837
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-2.665
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
3.388 -0.068 -15.31 -5.329
Min Fx 32209 1002 1DL31246
+ 1SIDL 1798.022
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.813
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
6.082 -0.014 -27.735 -0.763
Max Fy 32178 1006 1DL31214
+ 1SIDL 3415.453
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 3.898
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.806
+ 1.1TLB
-0.059
- 1.1BTA -16.473
- 1.1BTB 6.075
Min Fy 32178 1005 1DL31214
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
3404.8
+ 1PLA +-4.858
1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.104
+ 1.1TLB0.012
+ 1.1BTA-17.386
+ 1.1BTB -9.152
Max Fz 32209 1005 1DL31246
+ 1SIDL 2052.052
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.214
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.057
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA-32.411
+ 1.1BTB -0.129
Min Fz 32222 1005 1DL31258
+ 1SIDL 2052.052
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.44+ 1.1TLA
-0.508
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA +0.878
1.1BTB 0.673
Max Mx 32178 1001 1DL31214
+ 1SIDL 2906.292
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -2.65
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
3.805 0.103 -15.605 -5.302
Min Mx 32209 1003 1DL31246
+ 1SIDL 2041.958
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-1.205
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
6.362 -0.12 -30.439 -0.334
Max My 32219 1005 1DL31256
+ 1SIDL 2052.052
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.809
1PLB + 1.1TLA
0.577
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA +1.343
1.1BTB 2.035
Min My 32209 1005 1DL31246
+ 1SIDL 2052.052
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.214
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.057
+ 1.1TLB-0.09
+ 1.1BTA-32.411
+ 1.1BTB -0.129
Max Mz 32178 1006 1DL31214
+ 1SIDL 3415.453
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 3.898
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.806
+ 1.1TLB
-0.059
- 1.1BTA -16.473
- 1.1BTB 6.075
Min Mz 32178 1005 1DL31214
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
3404.8
+ 1PLA +-4.858
1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.104
+ 1.1TLB0.012
+ 1.1BTA-17.386
+ 1.1BTB -9.152
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -535.65 -1513.03
Skin Friction (kN) 1724.67
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 0 255.8 515 0.497 OK
Minima 4273 58.24 1556 0.037 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 62.23 OK
Minima -71.47 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.758 m
Hence de = 0.741 m and dv = 0.667 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 133 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 3179 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 25736 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0129 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 1.929 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 133 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared Raghava
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 26231 1003 1DL25169
+ 1SIDL 5237.813
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 7.299
1.1TLB + -8.739
1.1BTB 0.203 15.207 -58.351
Min Fx 26231 1002 1DL25169
+ 1SIDL 4709.022
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-7.549
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
-8.26 0.137 -17.287 63.447
Max Fy 26260 1005 1DL25168
+ 1SIDL 5218.681
+ 1CL + 1PLA +36.479
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-17.963
+ 1.1TLB0.428
+ 1.1BTA +43.84
1.1BTB -34.256
Min Fy 26260 1006 1DL25168
+ 1SIDL 5212.761
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-36.9+ 1.1TLA
-16.852
+ 1.1TLB0.085
- 1.1BTA -46.482
1.1BTB 39.483
Max Fz 26243 1001 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL +4711.83
1CL + 1PLA +-6.751
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
4.883 0.523 -30.067 -35.647
Min Fz 26260 1005 1DL25168
+ 1SIDL 5218.681
+ 1CL + 1PLA +36.479
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-17.963
+ 1.1TLB0.428
+ 1.1BTA +43.84
1.1BTB -34.256
Max Mx 26231 1001 1DL25169
+ 1SIDL +4711.83
1CL + 1PLA + 6.767
1.1TLA + -8.626
1.1BTA 0.523 -21.437 -58.718
Min Mx 26231 1006 1DL25169
+ 1SIDL 5212.761
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-14.32
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-9.933
+ 1.1TLB0.085
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
3.257 125.497
Max My 26260 1004 1DL25168
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5234.7
+ 1PLB -18.546
+ 1.1TLB - -13.557
1.1BTB 0.246 51.858 21.431
Min My 26237 1001 1DL25176
+ 1SIDL +4711.83
1CL + 1PLA +-2.707
1.1TLA + -0.359
1.1BTA 0.523 -48.146 -66.732
Max Mz 26234 1006 1DL25173
+ 1SIDL 5212.761
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-0.861
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.189
+ 1.1TLB0.085
- 1.1BTA -26.513
- 1.1BTB 154.078
Min Mz 26234 1005 1DL25173
+ 1SIDL 5218.681
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.207
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.107
+ 1.1TLB0.428
+ 1.1BTA +-32.14
1.1BTB -149.076
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 1.131 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.250 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 4737 2047 2495 0.820 OK
Minima 6319 84.88 2783 0.031 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 26243 1003 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL 5237.813
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-6.935
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
2.373 0.203 -19.832 -37.016
Min Fx 26243 1002 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL 4709.022
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 7.388
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
4.45 0.137 -27.856 39.174
Max Fy 26243 1006 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL 5212.761
+ 1CL + 1PLA +14.374
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.675
+ 1.1TLB0.085
- 1.1BTA -26.578
- 1.1BTB 75.793
Min Fy 26243 1005 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL 5218.681
+ 1CL + 1PLA -13.996
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.173
+ 1.1TLB0.428
+ 1.1BTA-29.041
+ 1.1BTB -74.335
Max Fz 26243 1001 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL +4711.83
1CL + 1PLA +-6.751
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
4.883 0.523 -30.067 -35.647
Min Fz 28823 1001 1DL27807
+ 1SIDL +4711.83
1CL + 1PLA + 0.599
1.1TLA + -0.363
1.1BTA 0.523 0.612 0.983
Max Mx 26243 1001 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL +4711.83
1CL + 1PLA +-6.751
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
4.883 0.523 -30.067 -35.647
Min Mx 26243 1006 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL 5212.761
+ 1CL + 1PLA +14.374
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.675
+ 1.1TLB0.085
- 1.1BTA -26.578
- 1.1BTB 75.793
Max My 28820 1001 1DL27805
+ 1SIDL +4711.83
1CL + 1PLA + 0.163
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0.143 0.523 1.127 2.125
Min My 26243 1001 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL +4711.83
1CL + 1PLA +-6.751
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
4.883 0.523 -30.067 -35.647
Max Mz 26243 1006 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL 5212.761
+ 1CL + 1PLA +14.374
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.675
+ 1.1TLB0.085
- 1.1BTA -26.578
- 1.1BTB 75.793
Min Mz 26243 1005 1DL25181
+ 1SIDL 5218.681
+ 1CL + 1PLA -13.996
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.173
+ 1.1TLB0.428
+ 1.1BTA-29.041
+ 1.1BTB -74.335
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 3961.78 3936.961
Skin Friction (kN) 1722.67
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 4737 1275 2495 0.511 OK
Minima 6319 56.64 2783 0.020 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 52.9 OK
Minima -2.381 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.966 m
Hence de = 0.907 m and dv = 0.817 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 719 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 4737 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.20 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 4825 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0024 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.246 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 719 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 26264 1004 1DL25202
+ 1SIDL 6659.642
+ 1CL + 1PLB -16.892
+ 1.1TLB - -13.765
1.1BTB 1.149 31.406 50.092
Min Fx 26561 1001 1DL25499
+ 1SIDL 4234.218
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 3.114
1.1TLA + -7.554
1.1BTA 0.956 -21.482 -64.965
Max Fy 26590 1005 1DL25498
+ 1SIDL 4677.055
+ 1CL + 1PLA +28.877
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-10.855
+ 1.1TLB0.931
+ 1.1BTA +19.332
1.1BTB -62.69
Min Fy 26293 1006 1DL25201
+ 1SIDL 6642.208
+ 1CL + 1PLA -52.448
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-23.874
+ 1.1TLB1.038
- 1.1BTA -76.902
1.1BTB -14.791
Max Fz 26277 1002 1DL25215
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5921.2
+ 1PLA + 9.193
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
5.669 1.062 -33.399 46.488
Min Fz 26293 1002 1DL25201
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5921.2
+ 1PLA -30.502
+ 1.1TLA - -24.051
1.1BTA 1.062 57.403 -21.038
Max Mx 26264 1001 1DL25202
+ 1SIDL +5835.87
1CL + 1PLA + 0.092
1.1TLA + -13.364
1.1BTA 1.453 -3.239 -69.157
Min Mx 26561 1006 1DL25499
+ 1SIDL 4786.288
+ 1CL + 1PLA -17.144
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.157
+ 1.1TLB0.371
- 1.1BTA - -5.164
1.1BTB 120.806
Max My 26293 1004 1DL25201
+ 1SIDL 6659.642
+ 1CL + 1PLB -34.045
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-20.75 1.149 86.413 -33.544
Min My 26270 1002 1DL25209
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
5921.2
+ 1PLA + 0.596
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
-2.732 1.062 -55.539 93.514
Max Mz 26268 1006 1DL25207
+ 1SIDL 6642.208
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.632
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-6.609
+ 1.1TLB1.038
- 1.1BTA -36.657
- 1.1BTB 173.431
Min Mz 26563 1005 1DL25502
+ 1SIDL 4677.055
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.286
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-3.471
+ 1.1TLB0.931
+ 1.1BTA-21.736
+ 1.1BTB -143.878
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 1.131 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.250 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 3452 1724 2212 0.779 OK
Minima 4366 209.4 2443 0.086 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.9645 m
Hence de = 0.907 m and dv = 0.816 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 704 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 5993 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.20 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 5104 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0026 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.260 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 704 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 26495 1003 1DL25433
+ 1SIDL 6272.422
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 7.558
1.1TLB + -9.654
1.1BTB 1.315 21.357 -58.519
Min Fx 26528 1002 1DL25466
+ 1SIDL 5319.405
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.675
1.1TLA - -14.303
1.1BTA 0.997 -6.039 69.887
Max Fy 26557 1005 1DL25465
+ 1SIDL 5925.517
+ 1CL + 1PLA +42.031
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-21.464
+ 1.1TLB2.456
+ 1.1BTA +61.452
1.1BTB -15.415
Min Fy 26524 1006 1DL25432
+ 1SIDL 6133.466
+ 1CL + 1PLA -33.407
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-18.607
+ 1.1TLB0.927
- 1.1BTA -55.245
1.1BTB 53.148
Max Fz 26541 1002 1DL25479
+ 1SIDL 5319.405
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 5.888
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
6.052 0.997 -35.319 23.983
Min Fz 26557 1002 1DL25465
+ 1SIDL 5319.405
+ 1CL + 1PLA -13.118
+ 1.1TLA - -25.305
1.1BTA 0.997 58.157 40.953
Max Mx 26528 1005 1DL25466
+ 1SIDL 5925.517
+ 1CL + 1PLA +17.866
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-12.769
+ 1.1TLB2.456
+ 1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
6.26 -115.198
Min Mx 26495 1006 1DL25433
+ 1SIDL 6133.466
+ 1CL + 1PLA -12.049
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-11.174
+ 1.1TLB0.927
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
7.278 129.958
Max My 26557 1004 1DL25465
+ 1SIDL 5880.832
+ 1CL + 1PLB -12.673
+ 1.1TLB - -19.006
1.1BTB 1.561 73.984 42.456
Min My 26534 1002 1DL25473
+ 1SIDL 5319.405
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 4.179
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
-2.699 0.997 -59.434 62.51
Max Mz 26497 1006 1DL25436
+ 1SIDL 6133.466
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.837
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-7.488
+ 1.1TLB0.927
- 1.1BTA -20.588
- 1.1BTB 151.838
Min Mz 26532 1005 1DL25471
+ 1SIDL 5925.517
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.006
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.349
+ 1.1TLB2.456
+ 1.1BTA-37.589
+ 1.1BTB -155.42
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 1.131 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.250 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 5574 2053 2693 0.763 OK
Minima 7558 87.55 2963 0.030 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.9645 m
Hence de = 0.907 m and dv = 0.816 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 720 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 5574 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.20 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 5104 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0026 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.260 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 720 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32239 1003 1DL31283
+ 1SIDL +7009.652
1CL + 1PLB + 2.196
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
36.862 -0.307 -246.086 34.466
Min Fx 32239 1002 1DL31283
+ 1SIDL +6164.758
1CL + 1PLA + 1.416
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
30.82 -0.106 -247.378 22.221
Max Fy 32244 1004 1DL31288
+ 1SIDL +7000.384
1CL + 1PLB + 1.1TLB
2.97 - 1.1BTB
27.288 -0.235 -80.851 21.343
Min Fy 32265 1004 1DL31308
+ 1SIDL +7000.384
1CL + 1PLB +-0.304
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-2.185 -0.235 5.187 -0.9
Max Fz 32256 1003 1DL31282
+ 1SIDL +7009.652
1CL + 1PLB + 0.458
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
39.885 -0.307 -363.91 37.879
Min Fz 32261 1003 1DL31304
+ 1SIDL +7009.652
1CL + 1PLB + 0.023
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
-4.262 -0.307 19.684 -1.571
Max Mx 32239 1001 1DL31283
+ 1SIDL +6175.932
1CL + 1PLA + 1.406
1.1TLA + 31.139
1.1BTA -0.07 -245.957 22.069
Min Mx 32239 1003 1DL31283
+ 1SIDL +7009.652
1CL + 1PLB + 2.196
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
36.862 -0.307 -246.086 34.466
Max My 32252 1003 1DL31297
+ 1SIDL +7009.652
1CL + 1PLB + 1.315
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
0.995 -0.307 34.943 0.984
Min My 32256 1005 1DL31282
+ 1SIDL +6922.627
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.446+ 1.1TLA
37.838
+ 1.1TLB-0.257
+ 1.1BTA-372.185
+ 1.1BTB 36.888
Max Mz 32256 1004 1DL31282
+ 1SIDL +7000.384
1CL + 1PLB + 1.1TLB
0.46 - 1.1BTB
39.714 -0.235 -363.271 38.072
Min Mz 32261 1004 1DL31305
+ 1SIDL +7000.384
1CL + 1PLB + 0.023
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-4.242 -0.235 15.395 -1.602
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 1.131 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.250 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 3328 1673 2023 0.827 OK
Minima 8369 213.4 2905 0.073 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.9645 m
Hence de = 0.907 m and dv = 0.816 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 454 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 8369 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.20 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 4536 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = As = 0.0023 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.232 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 454 kN
Shear stress (vv = Vu /(bv . dv) = 463.29 kN/m2
Grade of concrete = C40
As per Cl. 5.3.3.2, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, ultimate shear stress in concrete,
vc = 0.27/ m (100As/(bd))1/3 (fcu)1/3 (where m = 1.25) = 0.454 Mpa
= 454 kN/m2
Depth Factor, s = (500/d)1/4 or 0.70, whichever is greater = 0.885
Allowable shear stress in concrete, s vc = 401.301 kN/m2
Gross area of concrete section, Ac 1.131 m2
Increase in shear stress (1 + 0.05N/Ac) is done as per Cl. 5.5.6, pg. 29, BS 5400-4: 1990,
n = (1 + 0.05N /Ac) = 1.37
Modified shear strength of concrete (n s vc ) = 549.78 kN/m2
Shear to be carried by stirrups, Vus = Vu - (n s vc ) bv dv = -84.72 kN
As per Table 7, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, minimum shear to be carried by stirrups,
Vus,min = 0.4 bv dv = 391.83 kN
Dia of stirrup = 13 mm
No. of legs = 2
As per Table 7, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, spacing required,
sv = 0.87 fyv Asv d / Vus = 188 mm
Provided spacing 180 mm
OK
Shear reinforcement 13mm dia @ 180mm c/c
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32272 1005 1DL31317
+ 1SIDL +5707.853
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
2.052+ 1.1TLA
69.141
+ 1.1TLB 0.528
+ 1.1BTA-438.791
+ 1.1BTB 32.216
Min Fx 32272 1002 1DL31317
+ 1SIDL +5239.664
1CL + 1PLA + 1.703
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
62.48 0.359 -420.175 26.737
Max Fy 32277 1005 1DL31322
+ 1SIDL +5707.853
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
2.762+ 1.1TLA
49.741
+ 1.1TLB 0.528
+ 1.1BTA-132.355
+ 1.1BTB 19.849
Min Fy 32298 1005 1DL31342
+ 1SIDL +5707.853
1CL + 1PLA +-0.282
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-3.903
+ 1.1TLB 0.528
+ 1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
9.053 -0.837
Max Fz 32289 1003 1DL31316
+ 1SIDL +5696.943
1CL + 1PLB + 0.413
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
80.345 0.319 -657.93 34.189
Min Fz 32293 1003 1DL31337
+ 1SIDL +5696.943
1CL + 1PLB + 0.115
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
-8.94 0.319 45.594 -1.302
Max Mx 32272 1001 1DL31317
+ 1SIDL +5311.591
1CL + 1PLA + 1.868
1.1TLA + 63.535
1.1BTA 0.67 -422.681 29.314
Min Mx 32272 1006 1DL31317
+ 1SIDL +5563.545
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
1.721+ 1.1TLA
67.351
+ 1.1TLB0.216
- 1.1BTA -431.082
- 1.1BTB 27.007
Max My 32284 1003 1DL31330
+ 1SIDL +5696.943
1CL + 1PLB + 1.1TLB
1.39 + 1.1BTB
2.016 0.319 74.379 2.075
Min My 32289 1005 1DL31316
+ 1SIDL +5707.853
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.428+ 1.1TLA
77.017
+ 1.1TLB 0.528
+ 1.1BTA-663.937
+ 1.1BTB 35.406
Max Mz 32289 1005 1DL31316
+ 1SIDL +5707.853
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.428+ 1.1TLA
77.017
+ 1.1TLB 0.528
+ 1.1BTA-663.937
+ 1.1BTB 35.406
Min Mz 32294 1005 1DL31339
+ 1SIDL +5707.853
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.022+ 1.1TLA
-8.313
+ 1.1TLB 0.528
+ 1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
28.15 -1.49
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 1.131 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.250 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 3851 1724 2170 0.795 OK
Minima 5792 361.6 2598 0.139 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.9645 m
Hence de = 0.907 m and dv = 0.816 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 481 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 5792 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.20 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 4536 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = As = 0.0023 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.232 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 481 kN
Shear stress (vv = Vu /(bv . dv) = 491.18 kN/m2
Grade of concrete = C40
As per Cl. 5.3.3.2, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, ultimate shear stress in concrete,
vc = 0.27/ m (100As/(bd))1/3 (fcu)1/3 (where m = 1.25) = 0.454 Mpa
= 454 kN/m2
Depth Factor, s = (500/d)1/4 or 0.70, whichever is greater = 0.885
Allowable shear stress in concrete, s vc = 401.301 kN/m2
Gross area of concrete section, Ac 1.131 m2
Increase in shear stress (1 + 0.05N/Ac) is done as per Cl. 5.5.6, pg. 29, BS 5400-4: 1990,
n = (1 + 0.05N /Ac) = 1.26
Modified shear strength of concrete (n s vc ) = 504.06 kN/m2
Shear to be carried by stirrups, Vus = Vu - (n s vc ) bv dv = -12.62 kN
As per Table 7, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, minimum shear to be carried by stirrups,
Vus,min = 0.4 bv dv = 391.83 kN
Dia of stirrup = 13 mm
No. of legs = 2
As per Table 7, pg. 18, BS 5400-4: 1990, spacing required,
sv = 0.87 fyv Asv d / Vus = 188 mm
Provided spacing 180 mm
OK
Shear reinforcement 13mm dia @ 180mm c/c
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32494 1004 1DL31564
+ 1SIDL 4269.101
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-9.199
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-54.68 0.627 259.327 29.165
Min Fx 32420 1001 1DL31481
+ 1SIDL 1245.162
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.167
1.1TLA + -67.104
1.1BTA 0.604 290.023 -48.882
Max Fy 32406 1005 1DL31449
+ 1SIDL 3878.411
+ 1CL + 1PLA +36.918
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-75.095
+ 1.1TLB0.517
+ 1.1BTA460.765
+ 1.1BTB 33.374
Min Fy 32511 1006 1DL31563
+ 1SIDL 4216.584
+ 1CL + 1PLA -40.909
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-74.842
+ 1.1TLB 0.58
- 1.1BTA472.249
- 1.1BTB -37.085
Max Fz 32434 1006 1DL31495
+ 1SIDL + 1CL1352
+ 1PLA + 1.735
1PLB + 1.1TLA
10.071
+ 1.1TLB0.526
- 1.1BTA -56.727
- 1.1BTB -2.085
Min Fz 32437 1006 1DL31480
+ 1SIDL + 1CL1352
+ 1PLA +-1.921
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-93.978
+ 1.1TLB0.526
- 1.1BTA586.267
- 1.1BTB 111.053
Max Mx 32494 1001 1DL31564
+ 1SIDL 3801.566
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.1TLA
5.2 + -52.294
1.1BTA 0.687 234.209 -29.745
Min Mx 32389 1003 1DL31450
+ 1SIDL 3937.706
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 7.652
1.1TLB + -55.44
1.1BTB 0.449 251.31 -25.003
Max My 32437 1006 1DL31480
+ 1SIDL + 1CL1352
+ 1PLA +-1.921
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-93.978
+ 1.1TLB0.526
- 1.1BTA586.267
- 1.1BTB 111.053
Min My 32429 1006 1DL31491
+ 1SIDL + 1CL1352
+ 1PLA + 1PLB
6.91+ 1.1TLA
-4.083
+ 1.1TLB0.526
- 1.1BTA -80.748
- 1.1BTB 14.686
Max Mz 32543 1006 1DL31615
+ 1SIDL 1682.981
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 3.348
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-76.773
+ 1.1TLB 0.63
- 1.1BTA396.384
- 1.1BTB 113.093
Min Mz 32437 1005 1DL31499
+ 1SIDL 1346.808
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 2.115
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-92.713
+ 1.1TLB0.513
+ 1.1BTA489.767
+ 1.1BTB -106.128
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 4079 2500 2975 0.840 OK
Minima -1853 314.6 1997 0.158 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.090 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32510 1004 1DL31580
+ 1SIDL 4269.101
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 2.299
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
6.782 0.627 -27.761 3.573
Min Fx 32436 1001 1DL31497
+ 1SIDL 1245.162
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-0.146
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
8.772 0.604 -33.643 2.118
Max Fy 32510 1006 1DL31580
+ 1SIDL 4216.584
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 4.197
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.457
+ 1.1TLB 0.58
- 1.1BTA - -29.41
1.1BTB 6.251
Min Fy 32405 1005 1DL31466
+ 1SIDL 3878.411
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.787
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.489
+ 1.1TLB0.517
+ 1.1BTA-28.928
+ 1.1BTB -5.637
Max Fz 32436 1006 1DL31497
+ 1SIDL + 1CL1352
+ 1PLA + 0.259
1PLB + 1.1TLA
9.367
+ 1.1TLB0.526
- 1.1BTA - -36.63
1.1BTB -4.72
Min Fz 32448 1002 1DL31508
+ 1SIDL +1252.24
1CL + 1PLA +-0.144
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
-0.713 0.516 1.226 -0.214
Max Mx 32510 1001 1DL31580
+ 1SIDL 3801.566
+ 1CL + 1PLA + -1.51
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
6.705 0.687 -26.341 -1.82
Min Mx 32405 1003 1DL31466
+ 1SIDL 3937.706
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-1.924
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
7.061 0.449 -27.971 -2.961
Max My 32445 1002 1DL31506
+ 1SIDL +1252.24
1CL + 1PLA +-0.359
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
0.726 0.516 1.941 -0.729
Min My 32436 1006 1DL31497
+ 1SIDL + 1CL1352
+ 1PLA + 0.259
1PLB + 1.1TLA
9.367
+ 1.1TLB0.526
- 1.1BTA - -36.63
1.1BTB -4.72
Max Mz 32510 1006 1DL31580
+ 1SIDL 4216.584
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 4.197
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.457
+ 1.1TLB 0.58
- 1.1BTA - -29.41
1.1BTB 6.251
Min Mz 32405 1005 1DL31466
+ 1SIDL 3878.411
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.787
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.489
+ 1.1TLB0.517
+ 1.1BTA-28.928
+ 1.1BTB -5.637
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -1163.49 -1853.06
Skin Friction (kN) 2420.67
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 0 187.9 697.1 0.270 OK
Minima 4624 25.79 1725 0.015 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 57.47 OK
Minima -7.953 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.754 m
Hence de = 0.740 m and dv = 0.666 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 704 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 3199 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 20106 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0101 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 1.509 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 704 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32650 1004 1DL31740
+ 1SIDL 4334.635
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-14.02
1.1TLB - -43.176
1.1BTB 0.694 210.306 24.211
Min Fx 32599 1001 1DL31678
+ 1SIDL 1378.639
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.067
1.1TLA + -48.048
1.1BTA 0.486 224.044 -49.722
Max Fy 32585 1005 1DL31645
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
3618.9
+ 1PLA +36.059
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-48.94
+ 1.1TLB0.571
+ 1.1BTA314.289
+ 1.1BTB 23.656
Min Fy 32667 1006 1DL31739
+ 1SIDL 4269.433
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-49.1+ 1.1TLA
-58.522
+ 1.1TLB0.594
- 1.1BTA375.974
- 1.1BTB -60.637
Max Fz 32696 1006 1DL31787
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.803
1PLB + 1.1TLA
8.822
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA -42.912
- 1.1BTB -1.652
Min Fz 32698 1006 1DL31771
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-8.733
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-84.205
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA553.846
- 1.1BTB 99.851
Max Mx 32650 1004 1DL31740
+ 1SIDL 4334.635
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-14.02
1.1TLB - -43.176
1.1BTB 0.694 210.306 24.211
Min Mx 32599 1003 1DL31678
+ 1SIDL 1566.142
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-2.089
1.1TLB + -55.262
1.1BTB 0.419 267.124 -49.719
Max My 32698 1006 1DL31771
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-8.733
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-84.205
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA553.846
- 1.1BTB 99.851
Min My 32690 1006 1DL31782
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 8.393
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.281
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA -69.327
- 1.1BTB 23.854
Max Mz 32699 1006 1DL31791
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.823
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-73.593
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA389.888
- 1.1BTB 112.021
Min Mz 32617 1005 1DL31697
+ 1SIDL 1567.708
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-1.821
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-61.747
+ 1.1TLB0.434
+ 1.1BTA327.094
+ 1.1BTB -102.171
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -1188 1395 1549 0.901 OK
Minima 0.733 271.9 1868 0.146 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.060 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32662 1004 1DL31752
+ 1SIDL 4334.635
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 6.658
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
3.577 0.694 -40.905 27.785
Min Fx 32611 1001 1DL31690
+ 1SIDL 1378.639
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.185
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
4.575 0.486 -47.087 -4.259
Max Fy 32662 1006 1DL31752
+ 1SIDL 4269.433
+ 1CL + 1PLA +11.041
1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.583
+ 1.1TLB0.594
- 1.1BTA -45.682
- 1.1BTB 44.268
Min Fy 32580 1005 1DL31658
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
3618.9
+ 1PLA +-8.698
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.836
+ 1.1TLB0.571
+ 1.1BTA-38.206
+ 1.1BTB -32.996
Max Fz 32696 1006 1DL31787
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.803
1PLB + 1.1TLA
8.822
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA -42.912
- 1.1BTB -1.652
Min Fz 32709 1006 1DL31799
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-0.407
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.569
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
1.003 -0.618
Max Mx 32662 1004 1DL31752
+ 1SIDL 4334.635
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 6.658
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
3.577 0.694 -40.905 27.785
Min Mx 32611 1003 1DL31690
+ 1SIDL 1566.142
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-2.177
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
4.7 0.419 -52.676 -4.221
Max My 32707 1006 1DL31798
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-0.735
1PLB + 1.1TLA
0.105
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
1.398 -1.204
Min My 32693 1006 1DL31784
+ 1SIDL 1819.357
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 5.088
1PLB + 1.1TLA
6.231
+ 1.1TLB0.582
- 1.1BTA - -65.43
1.1BTB 10.453
Max Mz 32662 1006 1DL31752
+ 1SIDL 4269.433
+ 1CL + 1PLA +11.041
1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.583
+ 1.1TLB0.594
- 1.1BTA -45.682
- 1.1BTB 44.268
Min Mz 32580 1005 1DL31658
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
3618.9
+ 1PLA +-8.698
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.836
+ 1.1TLB0.571
+ 1.1BTA-38.206
+ 1.1BTB -32.996
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -604.75 -1306.17
Skin Friction (kN) 1722.67
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 0 516.9 572.7 0.903 OK
Minima 5052 294.8 1688 0.175 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 75.37 OK
Minima -251.8 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.758 m
Hence de = 0.741 m and dv = 0.667 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 667 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 3054 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 14476 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0072 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 1.085 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 667 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32720 1003 1DL31816
+ 1SIDL 3489.025
+ 1CL + 1PLB +20.072
1.1TLB + -28.263
1.1BTB -0.109 156.819 -12.494
Min Fx 32751 1002 1DL31848
+ 1SIDL +1310.08
1CL + 1PLA + 4.579
1.1TLA - -43.446
1.1BTA -0.054 211.713 40.515
Max Fy 32737 1005 1DL31815
+ 1SIDL 3453.294
+ 1CL + 1PLA +56.599
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-34.898
+ 1.1TLB
-0.058
+ 1.1BTA +258.38
1.1BTB 90.771
Min Fy 32730 1005 1DL31826
+ 1SIDL 3453.294
+ 1CL + 1PLA -13.039
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.297
+ 1.1TLB
-0.058
+ 1.1BTA-25.675
+ 1.1BTB -76.422
Max Fz 32766 1006 1DL31863
+ 1SIDL 1390.089
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.544
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.559
+ 1.1TLB
-0.057
- 1.1BTA -28.902
- 1.1BTB -3.972
Min Fz 32768 1005 1DL31847
+ 1SIDL 1427.103
+ 1CL + 1PLA +10.084
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-54.93
+ 1.1TLB
-0.132
+ 1.1BTA397.098
+ 1.1BTB -94.897
Max Mx 32720 1001 1DL31816
+ 1SIDL 3090.959
+ 1CL + 1PLA +20.486
1.1TLA + -27.753
1.1BTA 0.096 140.465 -11.815
Min Mx 32751 1003 1DL31848
+ 1SIDL 1411.506
+ 1CL + 1PLB + -0.69
1.1TLB + -44.64
1.1BTB -0.154 237.923 -59.874
Max My 32768 1005 1DL31847
+ 1SIDL 1427.103
+ 1CL + 1PLA +10.084
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-54.93
+ 1.1TLB
-0.132
+ 1.1BTA397.098
+ 1.1BTB -94.897
Min My 32761 1006 1DL31859
+ 1SIDL 1390.089
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 4.606
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.242
+ 1.1TLB
-0.057
- 1.1BTA -43.202
- 1.1BTB 5.814
Max Mz 32768 1006 1DL31847
+ 1SIDL 1390.089
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.193
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-54.577
+ 1.1TLB
-0.057
- 1.1BTA387.045
- 1.1BTB 101.12
Min Mz 32751 1005 1DL31848
+ 1SIDL 1427.103
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.278
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-46.366
+ 1.1TLB
-0.132
+ 1.1BTA239.111
+ 1.1BTB -109.722
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -1264 1405 1528 0.920 OK
Minima 7367 316.7 2562 0.124 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.025 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32732 1003 1DL31828
+ 1SIDL 3489.025
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-8.214
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
1.204 -0.109 -23.773 -36.303
Min Fx 32763 1002 1DL31860
+ 1SIDL +1310.08
1CL + 1PLA + 0.703
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
3.594 -0.054 -41.146 -1.482
Max Fy 32732 1006 1DL31828
+ 1SIDL 3311.495
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 3.796
1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.003
+ 1.1TLB
-0.078
- 1.1BTA -26.862
- 1.1BTB 7.369
Min Fy 32732 1005 1DL31828
+ 1SIDL 3453.294
+ 1CL + 1PLA -12.138
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.768
+ 1.1TLB
-0.058
+ 1.1BTA-26.444
+ 1.1BTB -50.542
Max Fz 32766 1006 1DL31863
+ 1SIDL 1390.089
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.544
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.559
+ 1.1TLB
-0.057
- 1.1BTA -28.902
- 1.1BTB -3.972
Min Fz 32779 1002 1DL31875
+ 1SIDL +1310.08
1CL + 1PLA +-0.052
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
-0.332 -0.054 0.594 -0.072
Max Mx 32732 1001 1DL31828
+ 1SIDL 3090.959
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-8.328
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
1.985 0.096 -25.465 -36.904
Min Mx 32763 1003 1DL31860
+ 1SIDL 1411.506
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-3.301
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
2.481 -0.154 -39.08 -8.206
Max My 32777 1002 1DL31874
+ 1SIDL +1310.08
1CL + 1PLA +-0.157
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
0.125 -0.054 0.801 -0.171
Min My 32763 1005 1DL31860
+ 1SIDL 1427.103
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-5.299
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.053
+ 1.1TLB
-0.132
+ 1.1BTA-41.847
+ 1.1BTB -11.594
Max Mz 32732 1006 1DL31828
+ 1SIDL 3311.495
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 3.796
1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.003
+ 1.1TLB
-0.078
- 1.1BTA -26.862
- 1.1BTB 7.369
Min Mz 32732 1005 1DL31828
+ 1SIDL 3453.294
+ 1CL + 1PLA -12.138
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.768
+ 1.1TLB
-0.058
+ 1.1BTA-26.444
+ 1.1BTB -50.542
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -540.85 -1356.7
Skin Friction (kN) 1722.67
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 0 503.4 572.7 0.879 OK
Minima 4945 254 1679 0.151 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 74.84 OK
Minima -241 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.758 m
Hence de = 0.741 m and dv = 0.667 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 685 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 3429 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 14476 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0072 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 1.085 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 685 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 13500 1003 1DL11562
+ 1SIDL 2451.323
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 6.987
1.1TLB + 29.203
1.1BTB 0.689 -43.066 -28.781
Min Fx 13302 1001 1DL11364
+ 1SIDL 1532.648
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 6.512
1.1TLA + 19.365
1.1BTA 0.611 -56.488 -30.42
Max Fy 13595 1005 1DL11627
+ 1SIDL 1873.365
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 35.01
1PLB + 1.1TLA
45.817
+ 1.1TLB0.731
+ 1.1BTA
-158.718
+ 1.1BTB 18.199
Min Fy 13397 1006 1DL11429
+ 1SIDL 2287.186
+ 1CL + 1PLA -33.758
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
43.765
+ 1.1TLB0.211
- 1.1BTA -167.98
- 1.1BTB -3.511
Max Fz 13529 1003 1DL11561
+ 1SIDL 2451.323
+ 1CL + 1PLB +18.029
1.1TLB + 50.777
1.1BTB 0.689 -172.684 13.176
Min Fz 13578 1004 1DL11640
+ 1SIDL 1864.358
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 3.368
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-8.439 0.593 42.998 9.878
Max Mx 32455 1001 1DL31520
+ 1SIDL +2204.05
1CL + 1PLA + 5.356
1.1TLA + 21.858
1.1BTA 1.017 -45.914 -30.571
Min Mx 13302 1006 1DL11364
+ 1SIDL 1780.664
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-9.414
1PLB + 1.1TLA
23.56
+ 1.1TLB 0.03
- 1.1BTA -49.784
- 1.1BTB 76.229
Max My 13572 1004 1DL11635
+ 1SIDL 1864.358
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 4.339
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
5.419 0.593 69.374 32.414
Min My 13529 1005 1DL11561
+ 1SIDL 2442.662
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 33.54
1PLB + 1.1TLA
47.589
+ 1.1TLB0.895
+ 1.1BTA
-172.877
+ 1.1BTB 12.491
Max Mz 32457 1006 1DL31523
+ 1SIDL 2309.859
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-1.578
1PLB + 1.1TLA
16.411
+ 1.1TLB0.734
- 1.1BTA -17.269
1.1BTB 95.308
Min Mz 13305 1005 1DL11368
+ 1SIDL 1585.628
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.182
1PLB + 1.1TLA
12.997
+ 1.1TLB0.642
+ 1.1BTA +18.658
1.1BTB -88.96
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Eff. N M Mu M/Mu Governing Neutral Neutral M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 1002 1265 1399 0.904 OK
Minima 2919 65.78 2062 0.032 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 13511 1003 1DL11573
+ 1SIDL 2451.323
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-4.665
1.1TLB + -8.189
1.1BTB 0.689 51.404 -21.132
Min Fx 13313 1001 1DL11375
+ 1SIDL 1532.648
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-4.597
1.1TLA + -3.497
1.1BTA 0.611 27.776 -20.509
Max Fy 13379 1006 1DL11441
+ 1SIDL 2287.186
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 9.507
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-6.359
+ 1.1TLB0.211
- 1.1BTA -43.161
1.1BTB 40.832
Min Fy 13577 1005 1DL11639
+ 1SIDL 1873.365
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-9.328
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-7.283
+ 1.1TLB0.731
+ 1.1BTA +46.209
1.1BTB -41.477
Max Fz 28552 1004 1DL27536
+ 1SIDL 1864.358
+ 1CL + 1PLB + -0.37
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
0.815 0.593 -1.96 -0.793
Min Fz 13578 1004 1DL11640
+ 1SIDL 1864.358
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 3.368
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-8.439 0.593 42.998 9.878
Max Mx 32466 1001 1DL31531
+ 1SIDL +2204.05
1CL + 1PLA +-4.165
1.1TLA + -5.182
1.1BTA 1.017 35.384 -18.122
Min Mx 13313 1006 1DL11375
+ 1SIDL 1780.664
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 8.878
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.565
+ 1.1TLB 0.03
- 1.1BTA -38.073
1.1BTB 36.937
Max My 13511 1003 1DL11573
+ 1SIDL 2451.323
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-4.665
1.1TLB + -8.189
1.1BTB 0.689 51.404 -21.132
Min My 28549 1004 1DL27534
+ 1SIDL 1864.358
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-0.374
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.179 0.593 -3.105 -1.663
Max Mz 13379 1006 1DL11441
+ 1SIDL 2287.186
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 9.507
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-6.359
+ 1.1TLB0.211
- 1.1BTA -43.161
1.1BTB 40.832
Min Mz 13577 1005 1DL11639
+ 1SIDL 1873.365
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-9.328
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-7.283
+ 1.1TLB0.731
+ 1.1BTA +46.209
1.1BTB -41.477
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 533.78 252.839
Skin Friction (kN) 0.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 1002 759.1 853.9 0.889 OK
Minima 2919 69.57 1346 0.052 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 50.88 OK
Minima -86.76 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.7615 m
Hence de = 0.742 m and dv = 0.668 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 686 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 1002 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 7854 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0039 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.588 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 686 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Naushad
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 32974 1005 1DL32087
+ 1SIDL 1914.456
+ 1CL + 1PLA +20.643
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.841
+ 1.1TLB
-29.664
+ 1.1BTA-34.134
+ 1.1BTB -52.109
Min Fx 33373 1005 1DL32274
+ 1SIDL +562.406
1CL + 1PLA +19.448
1PLB + 1.1TLA
12.359
+ 1.1TLB
-14.92
+ 1.1BTA-35.298
+ 1.1BTB -10.422
Max Fy 33012 1005 1DL32107
+ 1SIDL +689.033
1CL + 1PLA +60.213
1PLB + 1.1TLA
24.706
+ 1.1TLB
-28.045
+ 1.1BTA-135.333
+ 1.1BTB 156.521
Min Fy 32991 1006 1DL32086
+ 1SIDL 1196.162
+ 1CL + 1PLA-116.773
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
21.234
+ 1.1TLB
-10.073
- 1.1BTA-118.082
- 1.1BTB -499.176
Max Fz 33012 1004 1DL32107
+ 1SIDL 1452.267
+ 1CL + 1PLB -68.994
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
34.997 -13.296 -179.379 -313.236
Min Fz 33010 1004 1DL32123
+ 1SIDL 1452.267
+ 1CL + 1PLB +11.194
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-5.232 -13.296 31.337 62.243
Max Mx 13335 1006 1DL11397
+ 1SIDL +611.423
1CL + 1PLA -53.011
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
9.558
+ 1.1TLB
-3.356
- 1.1BTA -27.962
- 1.1BTB -94.838
Min Mx 32974 1005 1DL32087
+ 1SIDL 1914.456
+ 1CL + 1PLA +20.643
1PLB + 1.1TLA
7.841
+ 1.1TLB
-29.664
+ 1.1BTA-34.134
+ 1.1BTB -52.109
Max My 33004 1004 1DL32118
+ 1SIDL 1452.267
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 1.315
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
0.663 -13.296 49.21 106.472
Min My 33012 1004 1DL32107
+ 1SIDL 1452.267
+ 1CL + 1PLB -68.994
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
34.997 -13.296 -179.379 -313.236
Max Mz 32982 1006 1DL32096
+ 1SIDL 1196.162
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-4.432
1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.744
+ 1.1TLB
-10.073
- 1.1BTA -26.689
1.1BTB 191.697
Min Mz 32991 1006 1DL32086
+ 1SIDL 1196.162
+ 1CL + 1PLA-116.773
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
21.234
+ 1.1TLB
-10.073
- 1.1BTA-118.082
- 1.1BTB -499.176
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -4147 2048 2796 0.732 OK
Minima 8362 1221 3884 0.314 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared RAGHAV
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.002 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared RAGHAV
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 33018 1005 1DL32130
+ 1SIDL 1914.456
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-5.042
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.161
+ 1.1TLB
-29.664
+ 1.1BTA +3.821
1.1BTB -7.204
Min Fx 33395 1005 1DL32295
+ 1SIDL +562.406
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-1.67+ 1.1TLA
-1.061
+ 1.1TLB
-14.92
+ 1.1BTA +1.117
1.1BTB 1.086
Max Fy 33018 1006 1DL32130
+ 1SIDL 1196.162
+ 1CL + 1PLA +13.689
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.431
+ 1.1TLB
-10.073
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
7.46 35.034
Min Fy 33027 1005 1DL32139
+ 1SIDL +689.033
1CL + 1PLA +-7.274
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.833
+ 1.1TLB
-28.045
+ 1.1BTA +8.598
1.1BTB -14.04
Max Fz 33400 1003 1DL32300
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
710.57
+ 1PLB + 0.253
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
0.349 -11.946 -0.877 0.548
Min Fz 33027 1004 1DL32139
+ 1SIDL 1452.267
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 8.049
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-4.039 -13.296 11.688 21.43
Max Mx 28484 1006 1DL27468
+ 1SIDL +611.423
1CL + 1PLA + 4.552
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.821
+ 1.1TLB
-3.356
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
0.893 2.354
Min Mx 33018 1005 1DL32130
+ 1SIDL 1914.456
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-5.042
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.161
+ 1.1TLB
-29.664
+ 1.1BTA +3.821
1.1BTB -7.204
Max My 33027 1004 1DL32139
+ 1SIDL 1452.267
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 8.049
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-4.039 -13.296 11.688 21.43
Min My 33397 1003 1DL32298
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
710.57
+ 1PLB + 0.229
1.1TLB + -0.254
1.1BTB -11.946 -1.23 1.123
Max Mz 33018 1006 1DL32130
+ 1SIDL 1196.162
+ 1CL + 1PLA +13.689
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.431
+ 1.1TLB
-10.073
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
7.46 35.034
Min Mz 33027 1005 1DL32139
+ 1SIDL +689.033
1CL + 1PLA +-7.274
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.833
+ 1.1TLB
-28.045
+ 1.1BTA +8.598
1.1BTB -14.04
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -4301.75 -5925.21
Skin Friction (kN) 1722.67
Final Axial Load (kN) -2579.08 -4202.54
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 7435 276.1 1781 0.155 OK
Minima 7243 129.9 1790 0.073 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 61.3 OK
Minima -226.6 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.756 m
Hence de = 0.741 m and dv = 0.667 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 1004 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 0 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 32572 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0163 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 2.443 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 1004 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station LEBAK BULUS Prepared RAGHAV
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 13434 1004 1DL11496
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-9.996
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
10.727 0.383 30.05 25.091
Min Fx 13401 1001 1DL11463
+ 1SIDL 2169.376
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 6.734
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
8.395 0.589 1.619 -24.976
Max Fy 13430 1005 1DL11462
+ 1SIDL 2235.465
+ 1CL + 1PLA +36.588
1PLB + 1.1TLA
20.266
+ 1.1TLB0.682
+ 1.1BTA-34.849
+ 1.1BTB 34.855
Min Fy 13463 1006 1DL11495
+ 1SIDL +2314.81
1CL + 1PLA -42.985
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
22.91
+ 1.1TLB0.195
- 1.1BTA -37.063
- 1.1BTB -51.108
Max Fz 13463 1004 1DL11495
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB -23.375
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
25.554 0.383 -30.409 -30.433
Min Fz 13444 1004 1DL11506
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 5.711
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-6.375 0.383 35.625 32.309
Max Mx 13401 1005 1DL11463
+ 1SIDL 2235.465
+ 1CL + 1PLA +14.749
1PLB + 1.1TLA
9.261
+ 1.1TLB0.682
+ 1.1BTA +14.006
1.1BTB -50.976
Min Mx 13434 1006 1DL11496
+ 1SIDL +2314.81
1CL + 1PLA -18.041
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
10.306
+ 1.1TLB0.195
- 1.1BTA -17.969
1.1BTB 50.587
Max My 13438 1004 1DL11501
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-0.499
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
0.281 0.383 54.666 48.717
Min My 13463 1002 1DL11495
+ 1SIDL 2214.616
+ 1CL + 1PLA -22.979
+ 1.1TLA - 18.148
1.1BTA 0.237 -40.397 -29.459
Max Mz 13438 1006 1DL11501
+ 1SIDL +2314.81
1CL + 1PLA +-0.468
1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.158
+ 1.1TLB0.195
- 1.1BTA -44.193
1.1BTB 91.975
Min Mz 13404 1005 1DL11467
+ 1SIDL 2235.465
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 2.143
1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.611
+ 1.1TLB0.682
+ 1.1BTA +36.864
1.1BTB -82.94
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 2291 1686 1830 0.921 OK
Minima 2777 52.42 1907 0.027 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 13445 1004 1DL11507
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 5.561
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-6.183 0.383 29.25 26.598
Min Fx 13412 1001 1DL11474
+ 1SIDL 2169.376
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-4.305
1.1TLA + -3.323
1.1BTA 0.589 17.941 -19.742
Max Fy 13445 1006 1DL11507
+ 1SIDL +2314.81
1CL + 1PLA +10.403
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.186
+ 1.1TLB0.195
- 1.1BTA -25.637
1.1BTB 49.203
Min Fy 13412 1005 1DL11474
+ 1SIDL 2235.465
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-9.17+ 1.1TLA
-4.512
+ 1.1TLB0.682
+ 1.1BTA +22.555
1.1BTB -42.399
Max Fz 28515 1004 1DL27499
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-0.556
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
0.621 0.383 -1.973 -1.774
Min Fz 13445 1004 1DL11507
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 5.561
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-6.183 0.383 29.25 26.598
Max Mx 13412 1005 1DL11474
+ 1SIDL 2235.465
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-9.17+ 1.1TLA
-4.512
+ 1.1TLB0.682
+ 1.1BTA +22.555
1.1BTB -42.399
Min Mx 13445 1006 1DL11507
+ 1SIDL +2314.81
1CL + 1PLA +10.403
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.186
+ 1.1TLB0.195
- 1.1BTA -25.637
1.1BTB 49.203
Max My 13445 1004 1DL11507
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 5.561
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-6.183 0.383 29.25 26.598
Min My 28512 1004 1DL27497
+ 1SIDL 2333.276
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 0.198
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.197 0.383 -2.764 -2.465
Max Mz 13445 1006 1DL11507
+ 1SIDL +2314.81
1CL + 1PLA +10.403
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.186
+ 1.1TLB0.195
- 1.1BTA -25.637
1.1BTB 49.203
Min Mz 13412 1005 1DL11474
+ 1SIDL 2235.465
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-9.17+ 1.1TLA
-4.512
+ 1.1TLB0.682
+ 1.1BTA +22.555
1.1BTB -42.399
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 1537.66 1413.061
Skin Friction (kN) 0.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 2291 795.4 1287 0.618 OK
Minima 2777 51.25 1394 0.037 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 39.48 OK
Minima -1.926 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.7595 m
Hence de = 0.742 m and dv = 0.668 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 737 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 2291 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 10568 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0053 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.792 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 737 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 13467 1003 1DL11529
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 3.831
1.1TLB + 28.809
1.1BTB 0.131 -44.431 -34.703
Min Fx 13467 1002 1DL11529
+ 1SIDL 2064.948
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-6.579
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
26.62 0.487 -62.431 38.064
Max Fy 13496 1005 1DL11528
+ 1SIDL 2130.209
+ 1CL + 1PLA +28.144
1PLB + 1.1TLA
47.476
+ 1.1TLB0.342
+ 1.1BTA-175.825
+ 1.1BTB -7.523
Min Fy 13496 1006 1DL11528
+ 1SIDL 2115.522
+ 1CL + 1PLA -34.291
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
46.779
+ 1.1TLB0.286
- 1.1BTA-175.449
- 1.1BTB -3.253
Max Fz 13496 1003 1DL11528
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB +12.734
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
49.8 0.131 -171.759 -6.396
Min Fz 13479 1003 1DL11541
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-3.488
1.1TLB + -8.085
1.1BTB 0.131 42.329 -11.996
Max Mx 13467 1001 1DL11529
+ 1SIDL +2072.36
1CL + 1PLA + 3.699
1.1TLA + 26.767
1.1BTA 0.622 -61.217 -34.139
Min Mx 13467 1003 1DL11529
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 3.831
1.1TLB + 28.809
1.1BTB 0.131 -44.431 -34.703
Max My 13474 1003 1DL11537
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-3.817
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
0.698 0.131 66.422 -28.605
Min My 13496 1005 1DL11528
+ 1SIDL 2130.209
+ 1CL + 1PLA +28.144
1PLB + 1.1TLA
47.476
+ 1.1TLB0.342
+ 1.1BTA-175.825
+ 1.1BTB -7.523
Max Mz 13469 1006 1DL11532
+ 1SIDL 2115.522
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-2.514
1PLB + 1.1TLA
18.513
+ 1.1TLB0.286
- 1.1BTA -14.868
1.1BTB 95.598
Min Mz 13469 1005 1DL11532
+ 1SIDL 2130.209
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.165
1PLB + 1.1TLA
18.592
+ 1.1TLB0.342
+ 1.1BTA +16.601
1.1BTB -85.347
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 2185 1236 1406 0.879 OK
Minima 2530 71.6 1481 0.048 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 13476 1003 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-4.326
1.1TLB + -5.733
1.1BTB 0.131 63.239 -24.361
Min Fx 13476 1002 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL 2064.948
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 5.539
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
-3.421 0.487 50.036 33.376
Max Fy 13476 1006 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL 2115.522
+ 1CL + 1PLA +10.485
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-4.583
+ 1.1TLB0.286
- 1.1BTA -57.106
1.1BTB 62.268
Min Fy 13476 1005 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL 2130.209
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-9.185
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-4.778
+ 1.1TLB0.342
+ 1.1BTA +58.321
1.1BTB -52.765
Max Fz 28525 1003 1DL27509
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 0.372
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
0.774 0.131 -1.876 0.819
Min Fz 13479 1003 1DL11541
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-3.488
1.1TLB + -8.085
1.1BTB 0.131 42.329 -11.996
Max Mx 13476 1001 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL +2072.36
1CL + 1PLA +-4.232
1.1TLA + -3.577
1.1BTA 0.622 50.926 -23.769
Min Mx 13476 1003 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-4.326
1.1TLB + -5.733
1.1BTB 0.131 63.239 -24.361
Max My 13476 1003 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB +-4.326
1.1TLB + -5.733
1.1BTB 0.131 63.239 -24.361
Min My 28522 1003 1DL27507
+ 1SIDL 2132.343
+ 1CL + 1PLB + 0.279
1.1TLB + -0.241
1.1BTB 0.131 -2.909 1.619
Max Mz 13476 1006 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL 2115.522
+ 1CL + 1PLA +10.485
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-4.583
+ 1.1TLB0.286
- 1.1BTA -57.106
1.1BTB 62.268
Min Mz 13476 1005 1DL11538
+ 1SIDL 2130.209
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-9.185
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-4.778
+ 1.1TLB0.342
+ 1.1BTA +58.321
1.1BTB -52.765
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 1610.58 1547.93
Skin Friction (kN) 0.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 2185 1020 1136 0.898 OK
Minima 2530 85.21 1219 0.070 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 65.84 OK
Minima -64.82 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.763 m
Hence de = 0.743 m and dv = 0.669 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 660 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 2185 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 6082 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0030 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.455 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 660 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 27007 1006 1DL25968
+ 1SIDL +647.147
1CL + 1PLA -49.184
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
1.326
+ 1.1TLB-4.42
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
2.523 62.706
Min Fx 26982 1006 1DL25939
+ 1SIDL +547.639
1CL + 1PLA +15.106
1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.079
+ 1.1TLB5.434
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
8.275 185.009
Max Fy 26999 1005 1DL25938
+ 1SIDL +610.857
1CL + 1PLA +89.843
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.584
+ 1.1TLB5.553
+ 1.1BTA +-3.344
1.1BTB 143.828
Min Fy 27024 1006 1DL25967
+ 1SIDL +647.147
1CL + 1PLA -105.87
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.979
+ 1.1TLB-4.42
- 1.1BTA - -4.614
1.1BTB -193.476
Max Fz 26999 1004 1DL25938
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB +24.075
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
6.46 5.65 -2.463 190.929
Min Fz 26991 1004 1DL25948
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB + 3.362
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-1.87 5.65 11.429 -13.007
Max Mx 26982 1004 1DL25939
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB +21.508
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
2.345 5.65 12.38 120.259
Min Mx 27007 1004 1DL25968
+ 1SIDL +633.538
1CL + 1PLB -43.155
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
1.477 -4.433 4.934 -1.439
Max My 26985 1004 1DL25943
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB +16.804
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
0.04 5.65 16.8 43.538
Min My 27024 1001 1DL25967
+ 1SIDL +603.724
1CL + 1PLA -38.906
+ 1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
1.309 -3.418 -6.082 -242.573
Max Mz 26999 1006 1DL25938
+ 1SIDL +547.639
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
1.78+ 1.1TLA
5.321
+ 1.1TLB5.434
- 1.1BTA - -4.127
1.1BTB 206.487
Min Mz 27024 1005 1DL25967
+ 1SIDL + 1CL
591.76
+ 1PLA -18.945
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.672
+ 1.1TLB
-4.219
+ 1.1BTA +-5.534
1.1BTB -260.945
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 956.9 1788 2056 0.869 OK
Minima 956.9 235 2056 0.114 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.021 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 27018 1006 1DL25979
+ 1SIDL +647.147
1CL + 1PLA +23.154
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.682
+ 1.1TLB-4.42
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
3.345 117.142
Min Fx 26993 1006 1DL25950
+ 1SIDL +547.639
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
7.03+ 1.1TLA
-1.368
+ 1.1TLB5.434
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
6.222 10.188
Max Fy 27018 1006 1DL25979
+ 1SIDL +647.147
1CL + 1PLA +23.154
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.682
+ 1.1TLB-4.42
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
3.345 117.142
Min Fy 26993 1005 1DL25950
+ 1SIDL +610.857
1CL + 1PLA -20.392
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.472
+ 1.1TLB5.553
+ 1.1BTA +6.589
1.1BTB -100.626
Max Fz 29001 1004 1DL27985
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB +-0.184
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
0.182 5.65 -0.559 -0.004
Min Fz 26993 1004 1DL25950
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB + 0.098
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-1.754 5.65 7.707 -17.849
Max Mx 26993 1004 1DL25950
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB + 0.098
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-1.754 5.65 7.707 -17.849
Min Mx 27018 1004 1DL25979
+ 1SIDL +633.538
1CL + 1PLB +16.407
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.907 -4.433 4.208 90.022
Max My 26993 1004 1DL25950
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB + 0.098
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-1.754 5.65 7.707 -17.849
Min My 28998 1004 1DL27983
+ 1SIDL +563.707
1CL + 1PLB +-1.315
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.013 5.65 -0.825 -1.318
Max Mz 27018 1006 1DL25979
+ 1SIDL +647.147
1CL + 1PLA +23.154
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-0.682
+ 1.1TLB-4.42
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
3.345 117.142
Min Mz 26993 1005 1DL25950
+ 1SIDL +610.857
1CL + 1PLA -20.392
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.472
+ 1.1TLB5.553
+ 1.1BTA +6.589
1.1BTB -100.626
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 254.84 176.958
Skin Friction (kN) 0.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 956.9 708.5 931.6 0.761 OK
Minima 476.8 144 780.1 0.185 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 47.38 OK
Minima -119.4 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.002 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.756 m
Hence de = 0.741 m and dv = 0.667 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 571 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 957 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 16286 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0081 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 1.222 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 571 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31670 1005 1DL30730
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 7.497
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.307
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA-75.356
+ 1.1BTB -107.363
Min Fx 31639 1005 1DL30699
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA -11.128
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
21.374
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA
-110.033
+ 1.1BTB -165.356
Max Fy 31653 1006 1DL30713
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA +23.538
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.895
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA - -33.73
1.1BTB 146.533
Min Fy 31656 1006 1DL30698
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA -135.68
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-33.754
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA206.761
- 1.1BTB -564.779
Max Fz 31656 1005 1DL30698
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.224
1PLB + 1.1TLA
26.289
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA
-184.297
+ 1.1BTB -184.35
Min Fz 31656 1006 1DL30698
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA -135.68
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-33.754
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA206.761
- 1.1BTB -564.779
Max Mx 31639 1006 1DL30699
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA -89.993
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-25.873
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA113.236
- 1.1BTB -205.111
Min Mx 31670 1005 1DL30730
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 7.497
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.307
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA-75.356
+ 1.1BTB -107.363
Max My 31656 1006 1DL30698
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA -135.68
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-33.754
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA206.761
- 1.1BTB -564.779
Min My 31656 1005 1DL30698
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-3.224
1PLB + 1.1TLA
26.289
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA
-184.297
+ 1.1BTB -184.35
Max Mz 31647 1006 1DL30708
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-4.069
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-5.715
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA -36.726
- 1.1BTB 227.289
Min Mz 31656 1006 1DL30698
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA -135.68
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-33.754
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA206.761
- 1.1BTB -564.779
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 1.131 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.250 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -2966 4129 5531 0.747 OK
Minima 7666 902.4 7018 0.129 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.009 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31693 1005 1DL30752
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-1.5+ 1.1TLA
-0.394
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA +3.581
1.1BTB 2.23
Min Fx 31662 1005 1DL30721
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.793
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.439
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA +7.829
1.1BTB 7.76
Max Fy 31662 1006 1DL30721
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 11.41
1PLB + 1.1TLA3.041
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA - -8.796
1.1BTB 24.161
Min Fy 31693 1005 1DL30752
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-1.5+ 1.1TLA
-0.394
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA +3.581
1.1BTB 2.23
Max Fz 31662 1006 1DL30721
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 11.41
1PLB + 1.1TLA3.041
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA - -8.796
1.1BTB 24.161
Min Fz 31662 1005 1DL30721
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.793
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.439
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA +7.829
1.1BTB 7.76
Max Mx 31662 1006 1DL30721
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 11.41
1PLB + 1.1TLA3.041
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA - -8.796
1.1BTB 24.161
Min Mx 31693 1005 1DL30752
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-1.5+ 1.1TLA
-0.394
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA +3.581
1.1BTB 2.23
Max My 31662 1005 1DL30721
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.793
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.439
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA +7.829
1.1BTB 7.76
Min My 31662 1006 1DL30721
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 11.41
1PLB + 1.1TLA3.041
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA - -8.796
1.1BTB 24.161
Max Mz 31662 1006 1DL30721
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 11.41
1PLB + 1.1TLA3.041
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA - -8.796
1.1BTB 24.161
Min Mz 31666 1006 1DL30726
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 0.278
1PLB + 1.1TLA0.564
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA - -0.296
1.1BTB -1.238
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -2423.16 -3743.25
Skin Friction (kN) 4588.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 0 159.7 780.4 0.205 OK
Minima 7666 71.02 2852 0.025 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 41.84 OK
Minima -3.941 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.954 m
Hence de = 0.904 m and dv = 0.813 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 1069 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 0 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.20 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 50781 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0254 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 2.602 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 1069 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31679 1005 1DL30739
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA -10.882
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.932
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA-19.957
+ 1.1BTB -84.566
Min Fx 31648 1005 1DL30708
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA -10.956
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.715
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA +21.647
1.1BTB -45.722
Max Fy 31653 1006 1DL30713
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA +23.538
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.895
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA - -33.73
1.1BTB 146.533
Min Fy 31680 1005 1DL30740
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA -11.103
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.315
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA-15.025
+ 1.1BTB -73.684
Max Fz 31679 1005 1DL30739
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA -10.882
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.932
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA-19.957
+ 1.1BTB -84.566
Min Fz 31659 1005 1DL30716
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-1.142
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-3.165
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA +17.01
1.1BTB 6.163
Max Mx 31648 1006 1DL30708
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 5.911
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.831
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA -36.726
- 1.1BTB 227.289
Min Mx 31679 1005 1DL30739
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA -10.882
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.932
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA-19.957
+ 1.1BTB -84.566
Max My 31650 1005 1DL30711
+ 1SIDL 1703.031
+ 1CL + 1PLA +-8.354
1PLB + 1.1TLA
0.357
+ 1.1TLB
-40.492
+ 1.1BTA +27.537
1.1BTB -16.772
Min My 31679 1002 1DL30739
+ 1SIDL 2036.269
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 1.014
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
0.926 -13.109 -46.195 150.723
Max Mz 31648 1006 1DL30708
+ 1SIDL 2540.072
+ 1CL + 1PLA + 5.911
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.831
+ 1.1TLB2.499
- 1.1BTA -36.726
- 1.1BTB 227.289
Min Mz 31679 1005 1DL30739
+ 1SIDL 2644.893
+ 1CL + 1PLA -10.882
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.932
+ 1.1TLB
-42.973
+ 1.1BTA-19.957
+ 1.1BTB -84.566
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -2423.16 -3743.25
Skin Friction (kN) 1110.67
Final Axial Load (kN) -1312.50 -2632.58
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -2447 1497 1984 0.755 OK
Minima 6892 962.1 4252 0.226 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 LEBAK BULUS STATION FOUNDATION DESIGN
Design of Pile
No. of piles n = 4
Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Size of Column = 2.00 m x 2.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.60 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
Pile 2
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 28079 2179 1.0DL
27059
+ 1.0SIDL
9963.483
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
972.529+ 0.3PLB
369.365
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
8.509 + 0.3BTA
1713.19 + 0.3BTB
3940.492
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 28079 2107 1.0DL
27063
+ 1.0SIDL
-3423.27
+1SLX + 0.3SLY
-917.667
+ 0.3SLZ
-407.047 -9.061 -1094.875 -2702.372
Max Fy 28079 1452 1.15DL
27059
+ 1.2SIDL
8933.73
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.272 -4.125 -2.365 95.882 4823.064
Min Fy 28079 2186 1.0DL
27059
+ 1.0SIDL
-3206.92
+ 0.3CL +-935.813
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-409.007
+ 0.3TLA +-9.098
0.3TLB - 0.3BTA
-1454.62- 0.3BTB
-3680.548
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 28079 3154 1.0DL
27063
+ 1.0SIDL
9530.811
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
324.375+ 0.3TLA
943.798
- 0.3BTA 8.876
- 0.3SLX2958.963
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1042.418
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 28079 3147 1.0DL
27063
+ 1.0SIDL
-2968.77
+ 0.3CL +-290.344
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-981.484
+ 0.3BTA-9.583
+ 0.3SLX
-2758.237
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
-832.579
+ 1.54NLA
Max Mx 28079 3178 1.0DL
27063
+ 1.0SIDL
9598.976
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
324.606+ 0.3TLB
928.428
- 0.3BTB10.636
- 0.3SLX3007.516
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ1043.512
- 1.54NLB
Min Mx 28079 3154 1.0DL
27059
+ 1.0SIDL
-3220.48
+ 0.3CL +-311.602
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-964.405
- 0.3BTA-11.215
- 0.3SLX-3749.644
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1203.421
- 1.54NLA
Max My 28079 3147 1.0DL
27059
+ 1.0SIDL
9782.53
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
345.634+ 0.3TLA
926.718
+ 0.3BTA 10.508
+ 0.3SLX3988.056
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1447.291
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 28079 3154 1.0DL
27059
+ 1.0SIDL
-3220.48
+ 0.3CL +-311.602
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-964.405
- 0.3BTA-11.215
- 0.3SLX-3749.644
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1203.421
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 28079 1452 1.15DL
27059
+ 1.2SIDL
8933.73
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.272 -4.125 -2.365 95.882 4823.064
Min Mz 28079 2186 1.0DL
27059
+ 1.0SIDL
-3206.92
+ 0.3CL +-935.813
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-409.007
+ 0.3TLA +-9.098
0.3TLB - 0.3BTA
-1454.62- 0.3BTB
-3680.548
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 28080 2186 1.0DL
27064
+ 1.0SIDL
10300.6
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
909.965+ 0.3PLB
394.182
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
8.722 - 0.3BTA
1136.344- 0.3BTB
2701.769
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 28080 2107 1.0DL
27064
+ 1.0SIDL
-3766.55
+1SLX + 0.3SLY
-938.356
+ 0.3SLZ
-387.909 -9.373 -1238.117 -2851.729
Max Fy 28080 1452 1.15DL
27060
+ 1.2SIDL
-2089.84
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1147.285 17.863 0.044 -84.881 4642.31
Min Fy 28080 2186 1.0DL
27060
+ 1.0SIDL
-3262.9
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-959.18+ 0.3PLB
-387.191
+ 0.3TLA +-9.452
0.3TLB - -1639.524
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3872.616
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 28080 3154 1.0DL
27064
+ 1.0SIDL
9833.419
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
303.589+ 0.3TLA
965.084
- 0.3BTA 9.840
- 0.3SLX2806.746
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ 892.29
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 28080 3147 1.0DL
27064
+ 1.0SIDL
-3385.06
+ 0.3CL +-311.919
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-960.41
+ 0.3BTA-10.556
+ 0.3SLX-2911.903
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
-988.333
+ 1.54NLA
Max Mx 28080 3178 1.0DL
27064
+ 1.0SIDL
9765.464
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
303.819+ 0.3TLB
949.715
- 0.3BTB11.569
- 0.3SLX2855.293
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ893.378
- 1.54NLB
Min Mx 28080 3154 1.0DL
27060
+ 1.0SIDL
-3124.02
+ 0.3CL +-333.212
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-943.296
- 0.3BTA-12.196
- 0.3SLX-3924.817
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1381.042
- 1.54NLA
Max My 28080 3147 1.0DL
27060
+ 1.0SIDL
9572.377
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
324.882+ 0.3TLA
947.97
+ 0.3BTA 11.481
+ 0.3SLX 3814.986
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1276.668
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 28080 3154 1.0DL
27060
+ 1.0SIDL
-3124.02
+ 0.3CL +-333.212
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-943.296
- 0.3BTA-12.196
- 0.3SLX-3924.817
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1381.042
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 28080 1452 1.15DL
27060
+ 1.2SIDL
-2089.84
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1147.285 17.863 0.044 -84.881 4642.31
Min Mz 28080 2186 1.0DL
27060
+ 1.0SIDL
-3262.9
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-959.18+ 0.3PLB
-387.191
+ 0.3TLA +-9.452
0.3TLB - -1639.524
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3872.616
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 28081 2195 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
9737.192
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
356.337+ 0.3PLB
954.683
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
9.957 + 0.3BTA3782.1
+ 0.3BTB
1487.109
+ 0.3SLX + 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
Min Fx 28081 2115 1.0DL
27065
+ 1.0SIDL
-3301.47
+ 0.3SLX +-301.553
0.3SLY + 1SLZ
-950.747 -10.439 -2923.508 -866.217
Max Fy 28081 1452 1.15DL
27061
+ 1.2SIDL
9123.151
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.571 32.397 0.015 -202.693 4825.496
Min Fy 28081 2186 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
-3017.72
+ 0.3CL +-935.322
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-385.162
+ 0.3TLA +-9.385
0.3TLB - -1612.799
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3676.727
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 28081 3154 1.0DL
27065
+ 1.0SIDL
9454.81
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
323.607+ 0.3TLA
963.906
- 0.3BTA 8.990
- 0.3SLX2803.521
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ1037.66
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 28081 3147 1.0DL
27065
+ 1.0SIDL
-3084.52
+ 0.3CL +-289.855
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-959.532
+ 0.3BTA-9.671
+ 0.3SLX-2906.487
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
-829.811
+ 1.54NLA
Max Mx 28081 3178 1.0DL
27065
+ 1.0SIDL
9387.612
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
323.676+ 0.3TLB
948.537
- 0.3BTB10.751
- 0.3SLX2852.067
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1037.606
- 1.54NLB
Min Mx 28081 3154 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
-3103.67
+ 0.3CL +-310.743
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-942.857
- 0.3BTA-11.346
- 0.3SLX-3915.101
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1197.025
- 1.54NLA
Max My 28081 3147 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
9473.958
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
344.495+ 0.3TLA
947.23
+ 0.3BTA 10.665
+ 0.3SLX 3807.762
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1438.627
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 28081 3154 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
-3103.67
+ 0.3CL +-310.743
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-942.857
- 0.3BTA-11.346
- 0.3SLX-3915.101
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1197.025
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 28081 1452 1.15DL
27061
+ 1.2SIDL
9123.151
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.571 32.397 0.015 -202.693 4825.496
Min Mz 28081 2186 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
-3017.72
+ 0.3CL +-935.322
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-385.162
+ 0.3TLA +-9.385
0.3TLB - -1612.799
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3676.727
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 28081 1452 1.15DL
27061
+ 1.2SIDL
9123.151
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.571 32.397 0.015 -202.693 4825.496
Min Fx 28081 2115 1.0DL
27065
+ 1.0SIDL
-1821.71
+ 0.3SLX +-227.101
0.3SLY + 1SLZ
-726.182 -8.056 -2246.224 -640.81
Max Fy 28081 1452 1.15DL
27061
+ 1.2SIDL
9123.151
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.571 32.397 0.015 -202.693 4825.496
Min Fy 28081 2186 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL +-1553
0.3CL +-715.791
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-293.853
+ 0.3TLA +-7.265
0.3TLB - -1246.151
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-2800.142
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 28081 3154 1.0DL
27065
+ 1.0SIDL
7975.039
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
249.156+ 0.3TLA
739.34
- 0.3BTA 6.607
- 0.3SLX2126.236
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ812.254
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 28081 3147 1.0DL
27065
+ 1.0SIDL
-1604.75
+ 0.3CL +-215.403
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-734.967
+ 0.3BTA-7.288
+ 0.3SLX-2229.202
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
-604.404
+ 1.54NLA
Max Mx 28081 3178 1.0DL
27065
+ 1.0SIDL
7907.843
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
249.224+ 0.3TLB
723.971
- 0.3BTB8.368
- 0.3SLX2174.782
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ812.199
- 1.54NLB
Min Mx 28081 3154 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
-1623.9
+ 0.3CL +-236.291
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-718.291
- 0.3BTA-8.963
- 0.3SLX-3013.288
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-897.368
- 1.54NLA
Max My 28081 3147 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
7994.188
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
270.044+ 0.3TLA
722.665
+ 0.3BTA8.282
+ 0.3SLX 2905.949
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1138.97
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 28081 3154 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL
-1623.9
+ 0.3CL +-236.291
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-718.291
- 0.3BTA-8.963
- 0.3SLX-3013.288
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-897.368
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 28081 1452 1.15DL
27061
+ 1.2SIDL
9123.151
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.571 32.397 0.015 -202.693 4825.496
Min Mz 28081 2186 1.0DL
27061
+ 1.0SIDL +-1553
0.3CL +-715.791
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-293.853
+ 0.3TLA +-7.265
0.3TLB - -1246.151
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-2800.142
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 28080 1006 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +4819.438
1CL + 1PLA +-80.014
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.461
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.583 - 1.1BTB
-79.645 -350.652
Min Fx 28080 1001 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +3459.726
1CL + 1PLA + 33.359
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
-2.618 -0.190 -50.628 82.565
Max Fy 28080 1005 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +3723.571
1CL + 1PLA + 73.125
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-3.586
+ 1.1TLB + -0.095
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-36.166 229.086
Min Fy 28080 1006 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +4819.438
1CL + 1PLA +-80.014
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.461
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.583 - 1.1BTB
-79.645 -350.652
Max Fz 28080 1006 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +4819.438
1CL + 1PLA +-80.014
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.461
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.583 - 1.1BTB
-79.645 -350.652
Min Fz 28080 1005 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +3723.571
1CL + 1PLA + 73.125
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-3.586
+ 1.1TLB + -0.095
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-36.166 229.086
Max Mx 28080 1004 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +4163.301
1CL + 1PLB +-43.809
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
3.437 0.063 -54.259 -211.223
Min Mx 28080 1002 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +4029.363
1CL + 1PLA +-43.291
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
5.291 -0.853 -85.365 -207.764
Max My 28080 1005 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +3723.571
1CL + 1PLA + 73.125
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-3.586
+ 1.1TLB + -0.095
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-36.166 229.086
Min My 28080 1002 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +4029.363
1CL + 1PLA +-43.291
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
5.291 -0.853 -85.365 -207.764
Max Mz 28080 1005 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +3723.571
1CL + 1PLA + 73.125
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-3.586
+ 1.1TLB + -0.095
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-36.166 229.086
Min Mz 28080 1006 1DL 27060
+ 1SIDL +4819.438
1CL + 1PLA +-80.014
1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.461
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.583 - 1.1BTB
-79.645 -350.652
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 28081 1005 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL +4697.444
1CL + 1PLA +101.738
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.197
+ 1.1TLB + -0.059
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-47.459 464.339
Min Fx 28081 1002 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL + 3475.24
1CL + 1PLA +-18.052
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
4.317 -0.837 -77.404 -0.272
Max Fy 28081 1005 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL +4697.444
1CL + 1PLA +101.738
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.197
+ 1.1TLB + -0.059
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-47.459 464.339
Min Fy 28081 1006 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL + 3748.03
1CL + 1PLA +-51.037
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.638
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.563 - 1.1BTB
-64.752 -112.42
Max Fz 28081 1002 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL + 3475.24
1CL + 1PLA +-18.052
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
4.317 -0.837 -77.404 -0.272
Min Fz 28081 1005 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL +4697.444
1CL + 1PLA +101.738
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.197
+ 1.1TLB + -0.059
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-47.459 464.339
Max Mx 28081 1004 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL +3607.677
1CL + 1PLB +-17.943
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
2.462 0.083 -46.286 1.438
Min Mx 28081 1002 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL + 3475.24
1CL + 1PLA +-18.052
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
4.317 -0.837 -77.404 -0.272
Max My 28081 1004 1DL 27065
+ 1SIDL +3607.677
1CL + 1PLB +-17.943
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
2.462 0.083 -43.825 19.38
Min My 28081 1002 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL + 3475.24
1CL + 1PLA +-18.052
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
4.317 -0.837 -77.404 -0.272
Max Mz 28081 1005 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL +4697.444
1CL + 1PLA +101.738
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-2.197
+ 1.1TLB + -0.059
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-47.459 464.339
Min Mz 28081 1006 1DL 27061
+ 1SIDL + 3748.03
1CL + 1PLA +-51.037
1PLB + 1.1TLA
3.638
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.563 - 1.1BTB
-64.752 -112.42
ULS
Load P1 P2 P3 P4 - - -
case kN kN kN kN - - -
Z = 0.80 m
P kN
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = 510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 - M2
= 28716.101 mm2 OK
P kN Z = 0.80 m
2.0 m
column Z = 0.8m M1 = (P1+P3)xZ or (P2+P4)xZ or
(P1+P2)xZ or (P3+P4)xZ, whichever
is minimum
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = -510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 + M2
= 21357.103 mm2 OK
3.3 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack Width Check from Oasys
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 9.208 OK 1 45.86 OK
1 9.208 OK 1 45.86 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.5861 OK 1 -242.2 OK
1 -0.5861 OK 1 -242.2 OK
No. of piles n = 4
Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Size of Column = 2.00 m x 2.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.60 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
Pile 2
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30775 2179 1.0DL
29831
+ 1.0SIDL
10236.99
+ 0.3CL +1006.697
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
357.846
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
8.411 + 1660.991
0.3BTA + 0.3BTB
4112.859
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 30775 2107 1.0DL
29835
+ 1.0SIDL
-3525.47
+1SLX + 0.3SLY
-952.634
+ 0.3SLZ
-394.075 -8.877 -1062.642 -2842.628
Max Fy 30775 1452 1.15DL
29831
+ 1.2SIDL
9028.888
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1195.929 -5.382 -2.453 99.24 4955.127
Min Fy 30775 2186 1.0DL
29831
+ 1.0SIDL
-3196.74
+ 0.3CL +-972.018
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-395.421
+ 0.3TLA +-8.927
0.3TLB - -1411.883
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3860.701
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 30775 3154 1.0DL
29835
+ 1.0SIDL
9763.828
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
332.966+ 0.3TLA
956.277
- 0.3BTA 8.540
- 0.3SLX2991.788
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1076.606
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 30775 3178 1.0DL
29831
+ 1.0SIDL
-3149.59
+ 0.3CL +-323.151
0.3PLB + -991.524
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-9.048
- 0.3SLX-3732.198
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1259.37
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 30775 3147 1.0DL
29831
+ 1.0SIDL
9984.638
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
355.929+ 0.3TLA
941.248
+ 0.3BTA9.911
+ 0.3SLX 4026.665
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1498.658
+ 1.54NLA
Min Mx 30775 3171 1.0DL
29835
+ 1.0SIDL
-3087.66
+ 0.3CL +-300.887
0.3PLB + -978.719
0.3TLB + 0.3BTB
-10.352
+ 0.3SLX
-2829.773
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
-873.328
+ 1.54NLB
Max My 30775 3147 1.0DL
29831
+ 1.0SIDL
9984.638
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
355.929+ 0.3TLA
941.248
+ 0.3BTA9.911
+ 0.3SLX 4026.665
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1498.658
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 30775 3154 1.0DL
29831
+ 1.0SIDL
-3184.23
+ 0.3CL +-323.309
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-974.749
- 0.3BTA-10.333
- 0.3SLX-3808.596
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1260.06
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 30775 1452 1.15DL
29831
+ 1.2SIDL
9028.888
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1195.929 -5.382 -2.453 99.24 4955.127
Min Mz 30775 2186 1.0DL
29831
+ 1.0SIDL
-3196.74
+ 0.3CL +-972.018
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-395.421
+ 0.3TLA +-8.927
0.3TLB - -1411.883
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3860.701
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30776 2186 1.0DL
29836
+ 1.0SIDL
10214.36
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
938.455+ 0.3PLB
383.086
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
8.678 - 0.3BTA
1088.553- 0.3BTB
2809.797
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 30776 2107 1.0DL
29836
+ 1.0SIDL
-3565.01
+1SLX + 0.3SLY
-972.223
+ 0.3SLZ
-374.478 -9.263 -1203.646 -2984.042
Max Fy 30776 1452 1.15DL
29832
+ 1.2SIDL
-2026.84
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1173.354 17.195 0.008 -86.359 4769.537
Min Fy 30776 2186 1.0DL
29832
+ 1.0SIDL
-2954.7
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-995.1+ 0.3PLB
-372.331
+ 0.3TLA +-9.356
0.3TLB - -1601.121
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-4050.423
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 30776 3154 1.0DL
29836
+ 1.0SIDL
9890.848
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
310.974+ 0.3TLA
978.161
- 0.3BTA 9.384
- 0.3SLX2832.383
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ917.691
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 30776 3178 1.0DL
29832
+ 1.0SIDL
-3063.48
+ 0.3CL +-345.124
0.3PLB + -969.444
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-9.945
- 0.3SLX-3912.143
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1439.907
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 30776 3147 1.0DL
29832
+ 1.0SIDL
9669.457
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
333.939+ 0.3TLA
963.13
+ 0.3BTA 10.771
+ 0.3SLX 3845.198
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1317.783
+ 1.54NLA
Min Mx 30776 3154 1.0DL
29832
+ 1.0SIDL
-3029.56
+ 0.3CL +-345.279
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-952.671
- 0.3BTA-11.196
- 0.3SLX-3988.519
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1440.574
- 1.54NLA
Max My 30776 3147 1.0DL
29832
+ 1.0SIDL
9669.457
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
333.939+ 0.3TLA
963.13
+ 0.3BTA 10.771
+ 0.3SLX 3845.198
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1317.783
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 30776 3154 1.0DL
29832
+ 1.0SIDL
-3029.56
+ 0.3CL +-345.279
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-952.671
- 0.3BTA-11.196
- 0.3SLX-3988.519
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1440.574
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 30776 1452 1.15DL
29832
+ 1.2SIDL
-2026.84
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1173.354 17.195 0.008 -86.359 4769.537
Min Mz 30776 2186 1.0DL
29832
+ 1.0SIDL
-2954.7
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-995.1+ 0.3PLB
-372.331
+ 0.3TLA +-9.356
0.3TLB - -1601.121
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-4050.423
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 4
` Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30777 2195 1.0DL
29833
+ 1.0SIDL
9967.451
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
367.534+ 0.3PLB
967.936
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
9.422 + 3817.476
0.3BTA + 0.3BTB1544.554
+ 0.3SLX + 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
Min Fx 30777 2115 1.0DL
29837
+ 1.0SIDL
-3389.54
+ 0.3SLX +-313.635
0.3SLY + 1SLZ
-961.385 -9.821 -2964.414 -915.155
Max Fy 30777 1452 1.15DL
29833
+ 1.2SIDL
9178.541
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1196.147 31.457 -0.019 -201.908 4956.898
Min Fy 30777 2186 1.0DL
29833
+ 1.0SIDL
-3058.02
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-971.7+ 0.3PLB
-370.06
+ 0.3TLA +-9.301
0.3TLB - -1573.801
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3858.322
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 30777 3154 1.0DL
29837
+ 1.0SIDL
9642.315
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
332.426+ 0.3TLA
976.927
- 0.3BTA 8.679
- 0.3SLX2828.276
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1073.555
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 30777 3178 1.0DL
29833
+ 1.0SIDL
-3153.01
+ 0.3CL +-322.767
0.3PLB + -968.866
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-9.212
- 0.3SLX-3902.075
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1256.923
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 30777 3147 1.0DL
29833
+ 1.0SIDL
9696.681
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
355.151+ 0.3TLA
962.308
+ 0.3BTA 10.097
+ 0.3SLX 3837.157
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1493.014
+ 1.54NLA
Min Mx 30777 3154 1.0DL
29833
+ 1.0SIDL
-3119.86
+ 0.3CL +-322.931
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-952.093
- 0.3BTA-10.498
- 0.3SLX-3978.449
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1257.687
- 1.54NLA
Max My 30777 3147 1.0DL
29833
+ 1.0SIDL
9696.681
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
355.151+ 0.3TLA
962.308
+ 0.3BTA 10.097
+ 0.3SLX 3837.157
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1493.014
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 30777 3154 1.0DL
29833
+ 1.0SIDL
-3119.86
+ 0.3CL +-322.931
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-952.093
- 0.3BTA-10.498
- 0.3SLX-3978.449
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1257.687
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 30777 1452 1.15DL
29833
+ 1.2SIDL
9178.541
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1196.147 31.457 -0.019 -201.908 4956.898
Min Mz 30777 2186 1.0DL
29833
+ 1.0SIDL
-3058.02
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-971.7+ 0.3PLB
-370.06
+ 0.3TLA +-9.301
0.3TLB - -1573.801
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3858.322
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30777 1095 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL + 0.3CL
8463.9
+ 0.3PLA
290.53
+ 0.3PLB740.756
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
7.169
+ 0.3BTA
2904.226
+ 0.3BTB1232.038
+ 0.3SLX + 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
Min Fx 30777 1015 1DL 29837
+ 1SIDL +-1885.99
0.3SLX + 0.3SLY
-236.631
+ 1SLZ -734.205 -7.568 -2278.303 -679.455
Max Fy 30777 1152 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL -6806.564
1COL(-X)-MLC800.637 21.663 -0.067 -146.548 3328.256
Min Fy 30777 1086 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +-1554.97
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-744.163
+ 0.3PLB-281.855
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-7.190
- 0.3BTA
-1219.318
- 0.3BTB -2941.498
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 30777 3054 1DL 29837
+ 1SIDL +8128.187
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
255.44
+ 0.3TLA747.86
- 0.3BTA - 0.3SLX
6.602 - 0.3SLY
2147.733
- 1SLZ - 1.1NLA
837.857
Min Fz 30777 3078 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL + 0.3CL
-1638.9
+ 0.3PLB
-245.779
+ 0.3TLB-739.799
- 0.3BTB - 0.3SLX
-7.135 - 0.3SLY
-2996.279
- 1SLZ - -944.421
1.1NLB
Max Mx 30777 3047 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +8203.707
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
278.13
+ 0.3TLA 737.015
+ 0.3BTA + 0.3SLX
7.668 + 0.3SLY
2916.452+ 1SLZ1180.479
+ 1.1NLA
Min Mx 30777 3054 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +-1626.89
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-245.91
+ 0.3TLA -726.8
- 0.3BTA - 0.3SLX
-8.070 - 0.3SLY
-3057.744
- 1SLZ - 1.1NLA
-945.152
Max My 30777 3047 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +8203.707
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
278.13
+ 0.3TLA 737.015
+ 0.3BTA + 0.3SLX
7.668 + 0.3SLY
2916.452+ 1SLZ1180.479
+ 1.1NLA
Min My 30777 3054 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +-1626.89
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-245.91
+ 0.3TLA -726.8
- 0.3BTA - 0.3SLX
-8.070 - 0.3SLY
-3057.744
- 1SLZ - 1.1NLA
-945.152
Max Mz 30777 1152 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL -6806.564
1COL(-X)-MLC800.637 21.663 -0.067 -146.548 3328.256
Min Mz 30777 1086 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +-1554.97
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-744.163
+ 0.3PLB-281.855
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-7.190
- 0.3BTA
-1219.318
- 0.3BTB -2941.498
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30776 1006 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +5182.681
1CL + 1PLA +-89.254
1PLB + 1.1TLA
11.119
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.596 - 1.1BTB
-114.111 -401.954
Min Fx 30776 1001 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL + 3788.68
1CL + 1PLA + 35.308
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
7.248 0.210 -103.923 88.635
Max Fy 30776 1005 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +4140.058
1CL + 1PLA + 76.567
1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.942
+ 1.1TLB + -0.027
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-74.781 242.088
Min Fy 30776 1006 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +5182.681
1CL + 1PLA +-89.254
1PLB + 1.1TLA
11.119
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.596 - 1.1BTB
-114.111 -401.954
Max Fz 30776 1002 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +4324.569
1CL + 1PLA +-47.672
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
13.932 -0.465 -133.896 -233.749
Min Fz 30776 1003 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +3964.119
1CL + 1PLB + 34.556
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
-0.711 -0.402 -36.269 83.702
Max Mx 30776 1001 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL + 3788.68
1CL + 1PLA + 35.308
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
7.248 0.210 -103.923 88.635
Min Mx 30776 1006 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +5182.681
1CL + 1PLA +-89.254
1PLB + 1.1TLA
11.119
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.596 - 1.1BTB
-114.111 -401.954
Max My 30776 1003 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +3964.119
1CL + 1PLB + 34.556
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
-0.711 -0.402 -36.269 83.702
Min My 30776 1002 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +4324.569
1CL + 1PLA +-47.672
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
13.932 -0.465 -133.896 -233.749
Max Mz 30776 1005 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +4140.058
1CL + 1PLA + 76.567
1PLB + 1.1TLA
2.942
+ 1.1TLB + -0.027
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-74.781 242.088
Min Mz 30776 1006 1DL 29832
+ 1SIDL +5182.681
1CL + 1PLA +-89.254
1PLB + 1.1TLA
11.119
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.596 - 1.1BTB
-114.111 -401.954
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30777 1005 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +5099.417
1CL + 1PLA +108.201
1PLB + 1.1TLA4.25
+ 1.1TLB + -0.001
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-85.402 502.168
Min Fx 30777 1002 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL + 3781.26
1CL + 1PLA +-20.226
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
13.014 -0.464 -126.402 -8.124
Max Fy 30777 1005 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +5099.417
1CL + 1PLA +108.201
1PLB + 1.1TLA4.25
+ 1.1TLB + -0.001
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-85.402 502.168
Min Fy 30777 1006 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL + 4129.63
1CL + 1PLA +-57.509
1PLB + 1.1TLA
9.414
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.584 - 1.1BTB
-100.196 -140.975
Max Fz 30777 1002 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL + 3781.26
1CL + 1PLA +-20.226
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
13.014 -0.464 -126.402 -8.124
Min Fz 30777 1004 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +3926.012
1CL + 1PLB +-20.045
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.136 -0.268 -38.121 -5.777
Max Mx 30777 1001 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +4252.082
1CL + 1PLA + 62.658
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
7.838 0.224 -108.703 313.48
Min Mx 30777 1006 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL + 4129.63
1CL + 1PLA +-57.509
1PLB + 1.1TLA
9.414
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.584 - 1.1BTB
-100.196 -140.975
Max My 30777 1004 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +3926.012
1CL + 1PLB +-20.045
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-0.136 -0.268 -38.121 -5.777
Min My 30777 1002 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL + 3781.26
1CL + 1PLA +-20.226
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
13.014 -0.464 -126.402 -8.124
Max Mz 30777 1005 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL +5099.417
1CL + 1PLA +108.201
1PLB + 1.1TLA4.25
+ 1.1TLB + -0.001
1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
-85.402 502.168
Min Mz 30777 1006 1DL 29833
+ 1SIDL + 4129.63
1CL + 1PLA +-57.509
1PLB + 1.1TLA
9.414
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.584 - 1.1BTB
-100.196 -140.975
ULS
Load P1 P2 P3 P4 - - -
case kN kN kN kN - - -
Z = 0.80 m
P kN
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = 510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 - M2
= 28716.101 mm2 OK
P kN Z = 0.80 m
2.0 m
column Z = 0.8m M1 = (P1+P3)xZ or (P2+P4)xZ or
(P1+P2)xZ or (P3+P4)xZ, whichever
is minimum
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = -510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 + M2
= 21357.103 mm2 OK
3.3 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack Width Check from Oasys
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 8.767 OK 1 43.76 OK
1 8.767 OK 1 43.76 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.5861 OK 1 -228.8 OK
1 -0.5861 OK 1 -228.8 OK
No. of piles n = 4
Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Size of Column = 2.00 m x 2.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.60 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
Pile 2
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31023 2195 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
9922.966
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
375.585+ 0.3PLB
976.778
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
8.711 + 0.3BTA
4148.94
+ 0.3BTB
1579.095
+ 0.3SLX + 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
Min Fx 31023 2378 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
-3425.56
+ 0.3CL +-332.434
0.3PLB + -1015.109
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-7.993
- 0.3SLX-3898.792
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1308.179
- 1.54LLB
Max Fy 31023 1452 1.15DL
30079
+ 1.2SIDL
8960.105
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1208.772 -10.221 -3.725 112.573 5012.169
Min Fy 31023 2186 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
-3138.56
+ 0.3CL +-993.815
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-376.916
+ 0.3TLA +-8.015
0.3TLB - -1361.655
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3965.755
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 31023 3154 1.0DL
30083
+ 1.0SIDL
9582.365
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
339.802+ 0.3TLA
984.621
- 0.3BTA 8.603
- 0.3SLX -3103.78
0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1097.471
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 31023 3178 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
-3249.29
+ 0.3CL +-331.681
0.3PLB + -1018.457
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-7.951
- 0.3SLX-3887.625
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ-1302.6
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 31023 2331 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
9845.762
+ 0.3CL +1015.046
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
345.025
+ 0.3BTA8.855
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY
1570.8+ 0.3SLZ
4156.211
+ 1.54LLA
Min Mx 31023 2362 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
-3378.98
+ 0.3CL +-983.578
0.3PLB + -379.771
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-8.029
- 1SLX --1344.661
0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
-3930.785
- 1.54LLB
Max My 31023 2171 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
9700.148
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
363.081+ 0.3TLB
976.313
+ 0.3BTB8.560
+ 0.3SLX 4153.25
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1527.496
Min My 31023 3154 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
-3260.78
+ 0.3CL +-331.787
0.3PLA + -1005.781
0.3TLA - 0.3BTA-7.906
- 0.3SLX-3948.374
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1302.973
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 31023 1452 1.15DL
30079
+ 1.2SIDL
8960.105
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1208.772 -10.221 -3.725 112.573 5012.169
Min Mz 31023 2186 1.0DL
30079
+ 1.0SIDL
-3138.56
+ 0.3CL +-993.815
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-376.916
+ 0.3TLA +-8.015
0.3TLB - -1361.655
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3965.755
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31024 2186 1.0DL
30084
+ 1.0SIDL
10258.11
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
959.565+ 0.3PLB
365.488
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
9.303 - 0.3BTA
1060.788- 0.3BTB
2891.536
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 31024 2107 1.0DL
30084
+ 1.0SIDL
-3829.87
+1SLX + 0.3SLY
-992.964
+ 0.3SLZ
-357.124 -8.754 -1174.453 -3065.24
Max Fy 31024 1452 1.15DL
30080
+ 1.2SIDL
-2249.25
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1187.28 11.272 -1.247 -64.121 4835.484
Min Fy 31024 2186 1.0DL
30080
+ 1.0SIDL
-3356.01
+ 0.3CL -1017.035
+ 0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-355.877
+ 0.3TLA +-8.852
0.3TLB - -1549.316
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-4156.879
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 31024 3154 1.0DL
30084
+ 1.0SIDL
9959.584
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
319.455+ 0.3TLA
1006.44
- 0.3BTA 9.427
- 0.3SLX2961.265
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ 951.58
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 31024 3178 1.0DL
30080
+ 1.0SIDL
-3475.62
+ 0.3CL +-352.976
0.3PLB + -998.635
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-8.830
- 0.3SLX-4067.593
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1478.564
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 31024 2347 1.0DL
30080
+ 1.0SIDL
9904.946
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
342.605+ 0.3TLA
1003.132
+ 0.3BTA9.685
+ 0.3SLX 3954.761
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1359.433
+ 1.54LLA
Min Mx 31024 2202 1.0DL
30080
+ 1.0SIDL
-3264.45
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-364.99+ 0.3PLB
-991.408
+ 0.3TLA +-8.868
0.3TLB - -4104.172
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-1527.533
- 0.3SLX - 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
Max My 31024 2171 1.0DL
30080
+ 1.0SIDL
9835.851
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
342.757+ 0.3TLB
998.111
+ 0.3BTB9.416
+ 0.3SLX3991.069
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1361.313
Min My 31024 3154 1.0DL
30080
+ 1.0SIDL
-3471.41
+ 0.3CL +-353.055
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-985.986
- 0.3BTA-8.759
- 0.3SLX-4128.119
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1478.714
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 31024 1452 1.15DL
30080
+ 1.2SIDL
-2249.25
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1187.28 11.272 -1.247 -64.121 4835.484
Min Mz 31024 2186 1.0DL
30080
+ 1.0SIDL
-3356.01
+ 0.3CL -1017.035
+ 0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-355.877
+ 0.3TLA +-8.852
0.3TLB - -1549.316
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-4156.879
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31025 2195 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
9981.869
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
375.493+ 0.3PLB
998.974
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
9.043 + 3968.659
0.3BTA + 0.3BTB1580.147
+ 0.3SLX + 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
Min Fx 31025 2354 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
-3610.4
+ 0.3CL +-332.398
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-992.687
- 0.3BTA-8.224
- 0.3SLX-4082.309
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1309.993
- 1.54LLA
Max Fy 31025 1452 1.15DL
30081
+ 1.2SIDL
9007.297
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1208.807 25.524 -1.263 -179.563 5012.446
Min Fy 31025 2186 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
-3147.79
+ 0.3CL +-993.655
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-353.719
+ 0.3TLA +-8.766
0.3TLB - -1523.072
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3964.958
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 31025 3154 1.0DL
30085
+ 1.0SIDL
9657.218
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
339.678+ 0.3TLA
1005.269
- 0.3BTA 8.861
- 0.3SLX2956.611
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1098.628
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 31025 3178 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
-3470.56
+ 0.3CL +-331.766
0.3PLB + -998.021
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-8.236
- 0.3SLX-4057.783
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1305.069
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 31025 2331 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
9627.801
+ 0.3CL +1014.465
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
365.083
+ 0.3BTA9.604
+ 1SLX 1376.617
+ 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
4151.964
+ 1.54LLA
Min Mx 31025 2186 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
-3147.79
+ 0.3CL +-993.655
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-353.719
+ 0.3TLA +-8.766
0.3TLB - -1523.072
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3964.958
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max My 31025 2171 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
9807.026
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
363.11+ 0.3TLB
997.341
+ 0.3BTB8.867
+ 0.3SLX3982.557
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1529.535
Min My 31025 3154 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
-3466.76
+ 0.3CL +-331.958
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-985.372
- 0.3BTA-8.191
- 0.3SLX-4118.313
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1306.173
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 31025 1452 1.15DL
30081
+ 1.2SIDL
9007.297
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1208.807 25.524 -1.263 -179.563 5012.446
Min Mz 31025 2186 1.0DL
30081
+ 1.0SIDL
-3147.79
+ 0.3CL +-993.655
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-353.719
+ 0.3TLA +-8.766
0.3TLB - -1523.072
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3964.958
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31025 1095 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +8436.359
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
296.635
+ 0.3PLB764.993
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
7.039
+ 0.3BTA
3022.302
+ 0.3BTB +1258.46
0.3SLX + 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
Min Fx 31025 1015 1DL 30085
+ 1SIDL +-2049.05
0.3SLX + 0.3SLY
-242.372
+ 1SLZ -757.852 -6.188 -2373.864 -704.207
Max Fy 31025 1152 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL -6686.991
1COL(-X)-MLC809.228 17.788 -0.764 -132.174 3365.585
Min Fy 31025 1086 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +-1661.06
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-761.377
+ 0.3PLB-269.951
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-6.648
- 0.3BTA
-1182.282
- 0.3BTB -3026.029
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 31025 3054 1DL 30085
+ 1SIDL +8104.527
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
260.842
+ 0.3TLA 769.908
- 0.3BTA - 0.3SLX
6.859 - 0.3SLY
2248.373
- 1SLZ - 1.1NLA
855.635
Min Fz 31025 3078 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +-1917.87
0.3CL + 0.3PLB
-252.929
+ 0.3TLB -762.66
- 0.3BTB - 0.3SLX
-6.234 - 0.3SLY
-3116.99
- 1SLZ - -983.443
1.1NLB
Max Mx 31025 2031 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +8107.214
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
782.039
+ 0.3TLA 280.606
+ 0.3BTA + 1SLX
7.475+ 0.3SLY
1040.551
+ 0.3SLZ3211.882
+ 1.1LLA
Min Mx 31025 1086 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +-1661.06
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-761.377
+ 0.3PLB-269.951
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-6.648
- 0.3BTA
-1182.282
- 0.3BTB -3026.029
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max My 31025 1071 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +8261.517
0.3CL + 0.3PLB
284.252
+ 0.3TLB 763.36
+ 0.3BTB + 0.3SLX
6.863 + 0.3SLY
3036.2+ 1SLZ1207.848
Min My 31025 3054 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +-1928.44
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-253.078
+ 0.3TLA-752.772
- 0.3BTA - 0.3SLX
-6.187 - 0.3SLY
-3166.393
- 1SLZ - 1.1NLA
-984.425
Max Mz 31025 1152 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL -6686.991
1COL(-X)-MLC809.228 17.788 -0.764 -132.174 3365.585
Min Mz 31025 1086 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +-1661.06
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-761.377
+ 0.3PLB-269.951
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-6.648
- 0.3BTA
-1182.282
- 0.3BTB -3026.029
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31024 1006 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +4684.332
1CL + 1PLA +-92.913
1PLB + 1.1TLA
8.351
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.061 - 1.1BTB
-96.855 -416.538
Min Fx 31024 1001 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +3299.547
1CL + 1PLA + 37.178
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
7.077 1.122 -95.716 101.836
Max Fy 31024 1005 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +3611.105
1CL + 1PLA + 78.578
1PLB + 1.1TLA2.95
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
0.949 + 1.1BTB
-68.133 256.178
Min Fy 31024 1006 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +4684.332
1CL + 1PLA +-92.913
1PLB + 1.1TLA
8.351
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.061 - 1.1BTB
-96.855 -416.538
Max Fz 31024 1002 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL + 3840.66
1CL + 1PLA +-48.624
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
10.6 0.310 -113.399 -234.774
Min Fz 31024 1003 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +3474.507
1CL + 1PLB + 36.325
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
-2.43 0.314 -23.039 96.343
Max Mx 31024 1001 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +3299.547
1CL + 1PLA + 37.178
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
7.077 1.122 -95.716 101.836
Min Mx 31024 1006 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +4684.332
1CL + 1PLA +-92.913
1PLB + 1.1TLA
8.351
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.061 - 1.1BTB
-96.855 -416.538
Max My 31024 1003 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +3474.507
1CL + 1PLB + 36.325
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
-2.43 0.314 -23.039 96.343
Min My 31024 1002 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL + 3840.66
1CL + 1PLA +-48.624
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
10.6 0.310 -113.399 -234.774
Max Mz 31024 1005 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +3611.105
1CL + 1PLA + 78.578
1PLB + 1.1TLA2.95
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
0.949 + 1.1BTB
-68.133 256.178
Min Mz 31024 1006 1DL 30080
+ 1SIDL +4684.332
1CL + 1PLA +-92.913
1PLB + 1.1TLA
8.351
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.061 - 1.1BTB
-96.855 -416.538
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31025 1005 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +4596.671
1CL + 1PLA +106.352
1PLB + 1.1TLA4.317
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
0.970 + 1.1BTB
-79.241 484.524
Min Fx 31025 1002 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3323.086
1CL + 1PLA + -24.64
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
9.768 0.314 -106.606 -37.598
Max Fy 31025 1005 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +4596.671
1CL + 1PLA +106.352
1PLB + 1.1TLA4.317
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
0.970 + 1.1BTB
-79.241 484.524
Min Fy 31025 1006 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3662.612
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-64.71+ 1.1TLA6.77
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.048 - 1.1BTB
-83.967 -184.677
Max Fz 31025 1002 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3323.086
1CL + 1PLA + -24.64
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
9.768 0.314 -106.606 -37.598
Min Fz 31025 1003 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3958.317
1CL + 1PLB + 61.012
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
-1.791 0.344 -28.228 299.311
Max Mx 31025 1001 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3786.121
1CL + 1PLA + 60.936
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
7.719 1.132 -100.926 297.161
Min Mx 31025 1006 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3662.612
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-64.71+ 1.1TLA6.77
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.048 - 1.1BTB
-83.967 -184.677
Max My 31025 1004 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3487.293
1CL + 1PLB +-24.475
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
-1.387 0.143 -27.274 -35.131
Min My 31025 1002 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3323.086
1CL + 1PLA + -24.64
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
9.768 0.314 -106.606 -37.598
Max Mz 31025 1005 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +4596.671
1CL + 1PLA +106.352
1PLB + 1.1TLA4.317
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
0.970 + 1.1BTB
-79.241 484.524
Min Mz 31025 1006 1DL 30081
+ 1SIDL +3662.612
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
-64.71+ 1.1TLA6.77
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
-0.048 - 1.1BTB
-83.967 -184.677
ULS
Load P1 P2 P3 P4 - - -
case kN kN kN kN - - -
Z = 0.80 m
P kN
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = 510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 - M2
= 28716.101 mm2 OK
P kN Z = 0.80 m
2.0 m
column Z = 0.8m M1 = (P1+P3)xZ or (P2+P4)xZ or
(P1+P2)xZ or (P3+P4)xZ, whichever
is minimum
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = -510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 + M2
= 21357.103 mm2 OK
3.3 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack Width Check from Oasys
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 8.78 OK 1 43.82 OK
1 8.78 OK 1 43.82 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.5861 OK 1 -229.2 OK
1 -0.5861 OK 1 -229.2 OK
No. of piles n = 4
Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Size of Column = 2.00 m x 2.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.60 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
Pile 2
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31519 2179 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
10219.65
+ 0.3CL +1018.923
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
314.465
+ 0.3TLA +11.261
0.3TLB + 1317.078
0.3BTA + 0.3BTB
4169.385
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 31519 2362 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
-3129.3
+ 0.3CL +-985.343
0.3PLB + -316.526
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-8.678
- 1SLX --1214.564
0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
-3940.513
- 1.54LLB
Max Fy 31519 1452 1.15DL
30575
+ 1.2SIDL
9692.944
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1195.336 -49.856 -4.097 277.326 4953.351
Min Fy 31519 2186 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
-2875.92
+ 0.3CL +-996.106
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-314.22
+ 0.3TLA +-8.733
0.3TLB - -1229.233
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3977.966
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 31519 3154 1.0DL
30579
+ 1.0SIDL
9776.159
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
338.417+ 0.3TLA
939.417
- 0.3BTA15.773
- 0.3SLX -2827.14
0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1099.369
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 31519 3178 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
-2855.12
+ 0.3CL +-338.523
0.3PLB + 0.3TLB
-938.81
- 0.3BTB
-13.284
- 0.3SLX-3664.332
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1338.549
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 31519 3171 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
9869.023
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
361.085+ 0.3TLB
936.644
+ 0.3BTB15.810
+ 0.3SLX3767.429
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1524.861
+ 1.54NLB
Min Mx 31519 3178 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
-2855.12
+ 0.3CL +-338.523
0.3PLB + 0.3TLB
-938.81
- 0.3BTB
-13.284
- 0.3SLX-3664.332
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1338.549
- 1.54NLB
Max My 31519 3147 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
10003.92
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
361.209+ 0.3TLA
923.294
+ 0.3BTA 14.710
+ 0.3SLX 3810.342
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1526.276
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 31519 3154 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
-2907.95
+ 0.3CL +-338.335
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-919.223
- 0.3BTA-12.177
- 0.3SLX-3751.398
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1337.836
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 31519 1452 1.15DL
30575
+ 1.2SIDL
9692.944
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1195.336 -49.856 -4.097 277.326 4953.351
Min Mz 31519 2186 1.0DL
30575
+ 1.0SIDL
-2875.92
+ 0.3CL +-996.106
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-314.22
+ 0.3TLA +-8.733
0.3TLB - -1229.233
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3977.966
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31520 2186 1.0DL
30580
+ 1.0SIDL
10247.84
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
948.845+ 0.3PLB
338.248
+ 0.3TLA +11.322
0.3TLB - 0.3BTA
829.15
- 0.3BTB2842.12
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 31520 2107 1.0DL
30580
+ 1.0SIDL
-3031.19
+1SLX + 0.3SLY
-995.751
+ 0.3SLZ
-290.911 -8.901 -1084.05 -3080.764
Max Fy 31520 1452 1.15DL
30576
+ 1.2SIDL
-1953.15
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1170.017 -24.535 -1.729 69.167 4745.203
Min Fy 31520 2186 1.0DL
30576
+ 1.0SIDL +-2564
0.3CL -1020.545
+ 0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-289.827
+ 0.3TLA +-8.925
0.3TLB - -1430.581
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-4178.771
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 31520 3154 1.0DL
30580
+ 1.0SIDL
9942.887
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
314.983+ 0.3TLA
962.696
- 0.3BTA14.538
- 0.3SLX2657.938
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ929.853
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 31520 3178 1.0DL
30576
+ 1.0SIDL
-2679.32
+ 0.3CL +-361.818
0.3PLB + -915.361
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-12.049
- 0.3SLX-3855.831
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1529.78
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 31520 3171 1.0DL
30576
+ 1.0SIDL
9850.602
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
337.649+ 0.3TLB
959.926
+ 0.3BTB14.617
+ 0.3SLX3574.761
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1331.926
+ 1.54NLB
Min Mx 31520 3178 1.0DL
30576
+ 1.0SIDL
-2679.32
+ 0.3CL +-361.818
0.3PLB + -915.361
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-12.049
- 0.3SLX-3855.831
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1529.78
- 1.54NLB
Max My 31520 3147 1.0DL
30576
+ 1.0SIDL
9715.835
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
337.772+ 0.3TLA
946.577
+ 0.3BTA 13.489
+ 0.3SLX3617.67
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1333.337
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 31520 3154 1.0DL
30576
+ 1.0SIDL
-2628.67
+ 0.3CL +-361.621
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-895.783
- 0.3BTA-10.901
- 0.3SLX-3942.831
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ --1529
1.54NLA
Max Mz 31520 1452 1.15DL
30576
+ 1.2SIDL
-1953.15
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1170.017 -24.535 -1.729 69.167 4745.203
Min Mz 31520 2186 1.0DL
30576
+ 1.0SIDL +-2564
0.3CL -1020.545
+ 0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-289.827
+ 0.3TLA +-8.925
0.3TLB - -1430.581
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-4178.771
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31521 2179 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
10356.42
+ 0.3CL +1018.622
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
344.893
+ 0.3TLA +11.872
0.3TLB + 1155.742
0.3BTA + 0.3BTB
4166.527
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 31521 2338 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
-3140.72
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-984.94+ 0.3TLA
-297.419
- 0.3BTA-9.364
- 1SLX --1459.455
0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
-3937.012
- 1.54LLA
Max Fy 31521 1452 1.15DL
30577
+ 1.2SIDL
9309.692
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1194.748 -10.118 -1.668 -47.654 4948.556
Min Fy 31521 2186 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
-2921.81
+ 0.3CL +-995.835
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-295.723
+ 0.3TLA +-9.347
0.3TLB - -1470.107
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3975.387
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 31521 3154 1.0DL
30581
+ 1.0SIDL
9817.685
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
336.932+ 0.3TLA
964.164
- 0.3BTA15.953
- 0.3SLX2670.084
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1087.389
- 1.54NLA
Min Fz 31521 3178 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
-2808.6
+ 0.3CL +-337.065
0.3PLB + -917.186
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-13.513
- 0.3SLX-3867.079
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1325.461
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 31521 3171 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
9998.313
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
359.825+ 0.3TLB
961.8
+ 0.3BTB16.038
+ 0.3SLX3585.605
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1513.373
+ 1.54NLB
Min Mx 31521 3178 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
-2808.6
+ 0.3CL +-337.065
0.3PLB + -917.186
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-13.513
- 0.3SLX-3867.079
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1325.461
- 1.54NLB
Max My 31521 3147 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
9863.499
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
359.46+ 0.3TLA
948.451
+ 0.3BTA 14.938
+ 0.3SLX 3628.506
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1510.786
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 31521 3154 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
-2756.46
+ 0.3CL +-336.824
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-897.606
- 0.3BTA-12.405
- 0.3SLX-3954.089
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1324.348
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 31521 1452 1.15DL
30577
+ 1.2SIDL
9309.692
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1194.748 -10.118 -1.668 -47.654 4948.556
Min Mz 31521 2186 1.0DL
30577
+ 1.0SIDL
-2921.81
+ 0.3CL +-995.835
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-295.723
+ 0.3TLA +-9.347
0.3TLB - -1470.107
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3975.387
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31521 1079 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +8825.128
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
787.06
+ 0.3PLB270.163
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
9.397
+ 0.3BTA
848.515
+ 0.3BTB3230.612
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 31521 1007 1DL 30581
+ 1SIDL +-1582.95
1SLX + 0.3SLY
-741.943
+ 0.3SLZ -221.674 -6.849 -888.095 -2215.45
Max Fy 31521 1152 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL -6985.938
1COL(-X)-MLC799.033 -1.38 -0.832 -65.546 3319.614
Min Fy 31521 1086 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +-1390.52
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-764.273
+ 0.3PLB-220.992
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-6.872
- 0.3BTA
-1162.879
- 0.3BTB -3039.472
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 31521 3054 1DL 30581
+ 1SIDL +8322.902
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
257.951
+ 0.3TLA 742.938
- 0.3BTA - 12.444
0.3SLX - 0.3SLY
2013.042
- 1SLZ - 1.1NLA
844.648
Min Fz 31521 3078 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +-1313.83
0.3CL + 0.3PLB
-258.084
+ 0.3TLB -695.96
- 0.3BTB --10.004
0.3SLX - 0.3SLY
-2993.738
- 1SLZ --1003.885
1.1NLB
Max Mx 31521 3071 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +8503.546
0.3CL + 0.3PLB
280.844
+ 0.3TLB 740.574
+ 0.3BTB +12.529
0.3SLX + 0.3SLY
2712.264+ 1SLZ1191.798
+ 1.1NLB
Min Mx 31521 3078 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +-1313.83
0.3CL + 0.3PLB
-258.084
+ 0.3TLB -695.96
- 0.3BTB --10.004
0.3SLX - 0.3SLY
-2993.738
- 1SLZ --1003.885
1.1NLB
Max My 31521 1071 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +8468.946
0.3CL + 0.3PLB
280.73
+ 0.3TLB 734.478
+ 0.3BTB +12.099
0.3SLX + 0.3SLY
2736.319+ 1SLZ1191.104
Min My 31521 3054 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +-1289.39
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-257.935
+ 0.3TLA-681.258
- 0.3BTA - 0.3SLX
-9.240 - 0.3SLY
-3061.504
- 1SLZ --1003.328
1.1NLA
Max Mz 31521 1152 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL -6985.938
1COL(-X)-MLC799.033 -1.38 -0.832 -65.546 3319.614
Min Mz 31521 1086 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +-1390.52
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-764.273
+ 0.3PLB-220.992
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-6.872
- 0.3BTA
-1162.879
- 0.3BTB -3039.472
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31520 1006 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +5055.991
1CL + 1PLA -101.889
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
26.846
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
1.090 - 1.1BTB
-182.885 -466.745
Min Fx 31520 1001 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +3732.541
1CL + 1PLA + 27.646
1.1TLA + 33.155
1.1BTA 1.804 -211.832 48.664
Max Fy 31520 1005 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +4071.094
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
65.5+ 1.1TLA
29.373
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.744 + 1.1BTB
-187.089 185.192
Min Fy 31520 1006 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +5055.991
1CL + 1PLA -101.889
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
26.846
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
1.090 - 1.1BTB
-182.885 -466.745
Max Fz 31520 1001 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +3732.541
1CL + 1PLA + 27.646
1.1TLA + 33.155
1.1BTA 1.804 -211.832 48.664
Min Fz 31520 1003 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +3869.539
1CL + 1PLB + 27.036
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
19.336 1.390 -122.15 44.663
Max Mx 31520 1001 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +3732.541
1CL + 1PLA + 27.646
1.1TLA + 33.155
1.1BTA 1.804 -211.832 48.664
Min Mx 31520 1006 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +5055.991
1CL + 1PLA -101.889
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
26.846
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
1.090 - 1.1BTB
-182.885 -466.745
Max My 31520 1003 1DL 30580
+ 1SIDL +3869.539
1CL + 1PLB + 27.036
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
19.336 1.390 -102.814 17.627
Min My 31520 1001 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +3732.541
1CL + 1PLA + 27.646
1.1TLA + 33.155
1.1BTA 1.804 -211.832 48.664
Max Mz 31520 1005 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +4071.094
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
65.5+ 1.1TLA
29.373
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.744 + 1.1BTB
-187.089 185.192
Min Mz 31520 1006 1DL 30576
+ 1SIDL +5055.991
1CL + 1PLA -101.889
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
26.846
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
1.090 - 1.1BTB
-182.885 -466.745
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31521 1005 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +5081.302
1CL + 1PLA + 96.294
1PLB + 1.1TLA
30.908
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.714 + 1.1BTB
-199.592 438.322
Min Fx 31521 1002 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +3718.783
1CL + 1PLA +-29.578
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
28.949 1.077 -195.084 -59.506
Max Fy 31521 1005 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +5081.302
1CL + 1PLA + 96.294
1PLB + 1.1TLA
30.908
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.714 + 1.1BTB
-199.592 438.322
Min Fy 31521 1006 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +4059.488
1CL + 1PLA +-71.138
1PLB + 1.1TLA
25.397
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
1.068 - 1.1BTB
-171.092 -213.955
Max Fz 31521 1001 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +4242.353
1CL + 1PLA + 54.206
1.1TLA + 33.929
1.1BTA 1.763 -218.134 266.983
Min Fz 31521 1004 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +3878.031
1CL + 1PLB +-29.293
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
19.573 1.417 -122.963 -56.552
Max Mx 31521 1001 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +4242.353
1CL + 1PLA + 54.206
1.1TLA + 33.929
1.1BTA 1.763 -218.134 266.983
Min Mx 31521 1006 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +4059.488
1CL + 1PLA +-71.138
1PLB + 1.1TLA
25.397
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
1.068 - 1.1BTB
-171.092 -213.955
Max My 31521 1004 1DL 30581
+ 1SIDL +3878.031
1CL + 1PLB +-29.293
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
19.573 1.417 -103.389 -27.259
Min My 31521 1001 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +4242.353
1CL + 1PLA + 54.206
1.1TLA + 33.929
1.1BTA 1.763 -218.134 266.983
Max Mz 31521 1005 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +5081.302
1CL + 1PLA + 96.294
1PLB + 1.1TLA
30.908
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.714 + 1.1BTB
-199.592 438.322
Min Mz 31521 1006 1DL 30577
+ 1SIDL +4059.488
1CL + 1PLA +-71.138
1PLB + 1.1TLA
25.397
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
1.068 - 1.1BTB
-171.092 -213.955
ULS
Load P1 P2 P3 P4 - - -
case kN kN kN kN - - -
Z = 0.80 m
P kN
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = 510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 - M2
= 29935.909 mm2 OK
P kN Z = 0.80 m
2.0 m
column Z = 0.8m M1 = (P1+P3)xZ or (P2+P4)xZ or
(P1+P2)xZ or (P3+P4)xZ, whichever
is minimum
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = -510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 + M2
= 22264.331 mm2 OK
3.3 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack Width Check from Oasys
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 8.755 OK 1 43.91 OK
1 8.755 OK 1 43.91 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.5863 OK 1 -224.1 OK
1 -0.5863 OK 1 -224.1 OK
No. of piles n = 4
Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Size of Column = 2.00 m x 2.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.60 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
Pile 2
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30339 2179 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
9946.24
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
990.455+ 0.3PLB
322.383
+ 0.3TLA +11.029
0.3TLB + 1294.145
0.3BTA + 0.3BTB
4026.466
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 30339 2362 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
-3521.55
+ 0.3CL +-952.343
0.3PLB + -312.804
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB-9.068
- 1SLX --1250.816
0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
-3782.786
- 1.54LLB
Max Fy 30339 1452 1.15DL
29383
+ 1.2SIDL
9465.82
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1170.121 -54.709 -3.761 292.302 4825.965
Min Fy 30339 2186 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
-3360.65
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-963.21+ 0.3PLB
-312.355
+ 0.3TLA +-9.077
0.3TLB - -1257.599
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3821.778
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 30339 3171 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
9397.207
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
355.159+ 0.3TLB
909.109
+ 0.3BTB15.452
+ 0.3SLX3593.109
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1492.885
+ 1.54NLB
Min Fz 30339 3178 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
-3095.9
+ 0.3CL +-327.157
0.3PLB + -900.129
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-13.660
- 0.3SLX-3547.601
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1287.794
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 30339 3154 1.0DL
29387
+ 1.0SIDL
9298.189
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
333.995+ 0.3TLA
908.748
- 0.3BTA15.584
- 0.3SLX2704.721
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ 1079.4
- 1.54NLA
Min Mx 30339 3178 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
-3095.9
+ 0.3CL +-327.157
0.3PLB + -900.129
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-13.660
- 0.3SLX-3547.601
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1287.794
- 1.54NLB
Max My 30339 3147 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
9557.468
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
355.427+ 0.3TLA
891.91
+ 0.3BTA 14.402
+ 0.3SLX 3650.932
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1495.143
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 30339 3154 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
-3176.08
+ 0.3CL +-327.047
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-882.633
- 0.3BTA-12.251
- 0.3SLX-3619.868
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ-1287.7
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 30339 1452 1.15DL
29383
+ 1.2SIDL
9465.82
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1170.121 -54.709 -3.761 292.302 4825.965
Min Mz 30339 2186 1.0DL
29383
+ 1.0SIDL
-3360.65
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-963.21+ 0.3PLB
-312.355
+ 0.3TLA +-9.077
0.3TLB - -1257.599
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3821.778
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30340 2186 1.0DL
29388
+ 1.0SIDL
9679.723
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
924.781+ 0.3PLB
343.268
+ 0.3TLA +11.172
0.3TLB - 0.3BTA
827.917
- 0.3BTB
2750.176
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 30340 2107 1.0DL
29388
+ 1.0SIDL
-3096.57
+1SLX + 0.3SLY
-960.41
+ 0.3SLZ
-293.15 -9.275 -1079.949 -2935.938
Max Fy 30340 1452 1.15DL
29384
+ 1.2SIDL
-2262.6
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1146.811 -31.391 -1.461 100.611 4634.332
Min Fy 30340 2186 1.0DL
29384
+ 1.0SIDL
-2685.47
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-983.69+ 0.3PLB
-290.842
+ 0.3TLA +-9.330
0.3TLB - -1436.287
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3990.006
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 30340 3171 1.0DL
29384
+ 1.0SIDL
9319.124
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
333.78+ 0.3TLB
929.696
+ 0.3BTB14.395
+ 0.3SLX3419.174
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1316.656
+ 1.54NLB
Min Fz 30340 3178 1.0DL
29384
+ 1.0SIDL
-2786.53
+ 0.3CL +-347.468
0.3PLB + -879.039
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-12.527
- 0.3SLX-3716.295
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1454.296
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 30340 3154 1.0DL
29388
+ 1.0SIDL
9410.54
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
312.643+ 0.3TLA
929.307
- 0.3BTA14.482
- 0.3SLX -2552.03
0.3SLY - 1SLZ924.694
- 1.54NLA
Min Mx 30340 3178 1.0DL
29384
+ 1.0SIDL
-2786.53
+ 0.3CL +-347.468
0.3PLB + -879.039
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-12.527
- 0.3SLX-3716.295
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1454.296
- 1.54NLB
Max My 30340 3147 1.0DL
29384
+ 1.0SIDL
9162.372
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
334.034+ 0.3TLA
912.51
+ 0.3BTA 13.309
+ 0.3SLX 3476.889
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1318.802
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 30340 3154 1.0DL
29384
+ 1.0SIDL
-2707.91
+ 0.3CL +-347.352
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-861.549
- 0.3BTA-11.082
- 0.3SLX-3788.514
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1454.153
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 30340 1452 1.15DL
29384
+ 1.2SIDL
-2262.6
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1146.811 -31.391 -1.461 100.611 4634.332
Min Mz 30340 2186 1.0DL
29384
+ 1.0SIDL
-2685.47
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-983.69+ 0.3PLB
-290.842
+ 0.3TLA +-9.330
0.3TLB - -1436.287
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3990.006
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30341 2179 1.0DL
29385
+ 1.0SIDL
10203.54
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
990.32+ 0.3PLB
350.428
+ 0.3TLA +11.639
0.3TLB + 1158.239
0.3BTA + 0.3BTB 4024.81
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 30341 2107 1.0DL
29389
+ 1.0SIDL
-3590.75
+1SLX + 0.3SLY
-941.756
+ 0.3SLZ
-298.809 -9.619 -1120.485 -2800.825
Max Fy 30341 1452 1.15DL
29385
+ 1.2SIDL
9011.749
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.426 -16.709 -1.383 -18.429 4820.299
Min Fy 30341 2186 1.0DL
29385
+ 1.0SIDL
-3459.34
+ 0.3CL +-963.017
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-296.926
+ 0.3TLA +-9.676
0.3TLB - -1479.078
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3819.695
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 30341 3171 1.0DL
29385
+ 1.0SIDL
9604.981
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
354.189+ 0.3TLB
931.587
+ 0.3BTB15.679
+ 0.3SLX3431.329
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1483.256
+ 1.54NLB
Min Fz 30341 3178 1.0DL
29385
+ 1.0SIDL
-3062.14
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
-325.92+ -880.956
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-13.872
- 0.3SLX-3728.223
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1276.019
- 1.54NLB
Max Mx 30341 3154 1.0DL
29389
+ 1.0SIDL
9420.06
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
332.834+ 0.3TLA
930.77
- 0.3BTA15.767
- 0.3SLX2565.735
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
1069.164
- 1.54NLA
Min Mx 30341 3178 1.0DL
29385
+ 1.0SIDL
-3062.14
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLB
-325.92+ -880.956
0.3TLB - 0.3BTB
-13.872
- 0.3SLX-3728.223
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1276.019
- 1.54NLB
Max My 30341 3147 1.0DL
29385
+ 1.0SIDL
9448.148
+ 0.3CL + 0.3PLA
353.896+ 0.3TLA
914.401
+ 0.3BTA 14.628
+ 0.3SLX 3489.044
+ 0.3SLY + 1SLZ
1480.93
+ 1.54NLA
Min My 30341 3154 1.0DL
29385
+ 1.0SIDL
-2982.17
+ 0.3CL +-325.613
0.3PLA + 0.3TLA
-863.465
- 0.3BTA-12.462
- 0.3SLX-3800.452
- 0.3SLY - 1SLZ
-1274.32
- 1.54NLA
Max Mz 30341 1452 1.15DL
29385
+ 1.2SIDL
9011.749
- 1.5COL(-X)-MLC
1169.426 -16.709 -1.383 -18.429 4820.299
Min Mz 30341 2186 1.0DL
29385
+ 1.0SIDL
-3459.34
+ 0.3CL +-963.017
0.3PLA + 0.3PLB
-296.926
+ 0.3TLA +-9.676
0.3TLB - -1479.078
0.3BTA - 0.3BTB
-3819.695
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30341 1079 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +8629.426
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
765.786
+ 0.3PLB274.776
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
9.161
+ 0.3BTA848.48
+ 0.3BTB3123.152
+ 1SLX + 0.3SLY + 0.3SLZ
Min Fx 30341 1007 1DL 29389
+ 1SIDL +-2016.64
1SLX + 0.3SLY
-717.222
+ 0.3SLZ -223.157 -7.140 -886.256 -2123.645
Max Fy 30341 1152 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL -6716.489
1COL(-X)-MLC782.781 -5.61 -0.700 -45.256 3236.328
Min Fy 30341 1086 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +-1885.23
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-738.483
+ 0.3PLB-221.274
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-7.197
- 0.3BTA
-1169.32
- 0.3BTB -2918.036
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Max Fz 30341 3071 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +8127.542
0.3CL + 0.3PLB
277.169
+ 0.3TLB 717.992
+ 0.3BTB +12.174
0.3SLX + 0.3SLY
2591.515+ 1SLZ1171.021
+ 1.1NLB
Min Fz 30341 3078 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL + 0.3CL
-1584.7
+ 0.3PLB-248.9
+ 0.3TLB-667.361
- 0.3BTB --10.367
0.3SLX - 0.3SLY
-2888.409
- 1SLZ - -963.784
1.1NLB
Max Mx 30341 3054 1DL 29389
+ 1SIDL +7942.623
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
255.811
+ 0.3TLA 717.174
- 0.3BTA - 12.262
0.3SLX - 0.3SLY
1934.292
- 1SLZ - 1.1NLA
833.8
Min Mx 30341 3078 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL + 0.3CL
-1584.7
+ 0.3PLB-248.9
+ 0.3TLB-667.361
- 0.3BTB --10.367
0.3SLX - 0.3SLY
-2888.409
- 1SLZ - -963.784
1.1NLB
Max My 30341 3047 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +8006.006
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
276.967
+ 0.3TLA705.98
+ 0.3BTA + 11.505
0.3SLX + 0.3SLY
2629.833+ 1SLZ1169.302
+ 1.1NLA
Min My 30341 3054 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +-1540.03
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-248.684
+ 0.3TLA-655.044
- 0.3BTA - 0.3SLX
-9.339 - 0.3SLY
-2941.24
- 1SLZ - 1.1NLA
-962.691
Max Mz 30341 1152 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL -6716.489
1COL(-X)-MLC782.781 -5.61 -0.700 -45.256 3236.328
Min Mz 30341 1086 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +-1885.23
0.3CL + 0.3PLA
-738.483
+ 0.3PLB-221.274
+ 0.3TLA + 0.3TLB
-7.197
- 0.3BTA
-1169.32
- 0.3BTB -2918.036
- 1SLX - 0.3SLY - 0.3SLZ
Pile 3
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30340 1006 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +4572.776
1CL + 1PLA +-91.581
1PLB + 1.1TLA
32.059
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
0.737 - 1.1BTB
-200.236 -408.314
Min Fx 30340 1001 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +3358.909
1CL + 1PLA + 30.994
1.1TLA + 32.125
1.1BTA 1.785 -197.46 69.997
Max Fy 30340 1005 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +3615.971
1CL + 1PLA + 64.836
1PLB + 1.1TLA
36.028
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.420 + 1.1BTB
-210.393 187.531
Min Fy 30340 1006 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +4572.776
1CL + 1PLA +-91.581
1PLB + 1.1TLA
32.059
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
0.737 - 1.1BTB
-200.236 -408.314
Max Fz 30340 1005 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +3615.971
1CL + 1PLA + 64.836
1PLB + 1.1TLA
36.028
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.420 + 1.1BTB
-210.393 187.531
Min Fz 30340 1002 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +3818.965
1CL + 1PLA +-47.229
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
27.316 1.056 -181.69 -227.862
Max Mx 30340 1001 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +3358.909
1CL + 1PLA + 30.994
1.1TLA + 32.125
1.1BTA 1.785 -197.46 69.997
Min Mx 30340 1006 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +4572.776
1CL + 1PLA +-91.581
1PLB + 1.1TLA
32.059
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
0.737 - 1.1BTB
-200.236 -408.314
Max My 30340 1003 1DL 29388
+ 1SIDL +3479.236
1CL + 1PLB + 30.323
1.1TLB + 1.1BTB
28.307 0.803 -130.5 35.658
Min My 30340 1005 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +3615.971
1CL + 1PLA + 64.836
1PLB + 1.1TLA
36.028
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.420 + 1.1BTB
-210.393 187.531
Max Mz 30340 1005 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +3615.971
1CL + 1PLA + 64.836
1PLB + 1.1TLA
36.028
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.420 + 1.1BTB
-210.393 187.531
Min Mz 30340 1006 1DL 29384
+ 1SIDL +4572.776
1CL + 1PLA +-91.581
1PLB + 1.1TLA
32.059
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
0.737 - 1.1BTB
-200.236 -408.314
Pile 4
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 30341 1005 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +4629.627
1CL + 1PLA + 92.112
1PLB + 1.1TLA
37.606
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.372 + 1.1BTB
-223.257 411.726
Min Fx 30341 1002 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +3310.699
1CL + 1PLA +-23.753
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
26.505 1.025 -175.077 -34.894
Max Fy 30341 1005 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +4629.627
1CL + 1PLA + 92.112
1PLB + 1.1TLA
37.606
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.372 + 1.1BTB
-223.257 411.726
Min Fy 30341 1006 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +3555.419
1CL + 1PLA +-64.612
1PLB + 1.1TLA
30.494
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
0.700 - 1.1BTB
-187.484 -186.626
Max Fz 30341 1005 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +4629.627
1CL + 1PLA + 92.112
1PLB + 1.1TLA
37.606
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.372 + 1.1BTB
-223.257 411.726
Min Fz 30341 1002 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +3310.699
1CL + 1PLA +-23.753
1.1TLA - 1.1BTA
26.505 1.025 -175.077 -34.894
Max Mx 30341 1001 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +3866.648
1CL + 1PLA + 54.68
1.1TLA + 32.887
1.1BTA 1.744 -203.66 264.686
Min Mx 30341 1006 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +3555.419
1CL + 1PLA +-64.612
1PLB + 1.1TLA
30.494
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
0.700 - 1.1BTB
-187.484 -186.626
Max My 30341 1004 1DL 29389
+ 1SIDL + 3465.93
1CL + 1PLB +-23.705
1.1TLB - 1.1BTB
28.335 0.814 -129.462 -9.652
Min My 30341 1005 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +4629.627
1CL + 1PLA + 92.112
1PLB + 1.1TLA
37.606
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.372 + 1.1BTB
-223.257 411.726
Max Mz 30341 1005 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +4629.627
1CL + 1PLA + 92.112
1PLB + 1.1TLA
37.606
+ 1.1TLB + 1.1BTA
1.372 + 1.1BTB
-223.257 411.726
Min Mz 30341 1006 1DL 29385
+ 1SIDL +3555.419
1CL + 1PLA +-64.612
1PLB + 1.1TLA
30.494
+ 1.1TLB - 1.1BTA
0.700 - 1.1BTB
-187.484 -186.626
ULS
Load P1 P2 P3 P4 - - -
case kN kN kN kN - - -
Z = 0.80 m
P kN
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Station Prepared Varun
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = 510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 - M2
= 28716.101 mm2 OK
P kN Z = 0.80 m
2.0 m
column Z = 0.8m M1 = (P1+P3)xZ or (P2+P4)xZ or
(P1+P2)xZ or (P3+P4)xZ, whichever
is minimum
Weight per unit length due to soil and pile cap = 374.858 kN/m
Moment due to unit weight, M2 = -510.276 kN.m
Design Moment, M = M 1 + M2
= 21357.103 mm2 OK
3.3 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack Width Check from Oasys
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 8.639 OK 1 43.14 OK
1 8.639 OK 1 43.14 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.5862 OK 1 -224.9 OK
1 -0.5862 OK 1 -224.9 OK
No. of piles n = 2
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.22 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 18237 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
Oasys Results
Concrete stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 0.4998 OK 2 2.761 OK
2 0.4998 OK 2 2.761 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.5001 OK 2 -2.696 OK
2 -0.5001 OK 2 -2.696 OK
= 17392 mm2 OK
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 8.461 OK 2 41.84 OK
2 8.461 OK 2 41.84 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.6119 OK 2 -139.1 OK
2 -0.6119 OK 2 -139.1 OK
No. of piles n = 2
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.22 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 18237 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
Oasys Results
Concrete stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 0.4539 OK 2 2.507 OK
2 0.4539 OK 2 2.507 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.4541 OK 2 -2.449 OK
2 -0.4541 OK 2 -2.449 OK
= 14128 mm2 OK
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 7.825 OK 2 38.78 OK
2 7.825 OK 2 38.78 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.6121 OK 2 -127.4 OK
2 -0.6121 OK 2 -127.4 OK
No. of piles n = 2
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.20 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 18158 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
Oasys Results
Concrete stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 0.2006 OK 2 1.108 OK
2 0.2006 OK 2 1.108 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.2007 OK 2 -1.082 OK
2 -0.2007 OK 2 -1.082 OK
= 14165 mm2 OK
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 5.76 OK 2 28.34 OK
2 5.76 OK 2 28.34 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.6116 OK 2 -96.62 OK
2 -0.6116 OK 2 -96.62 OK
No. of piles n = 2
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.20 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 18158 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
Oasys Results
Concrete stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 0.2836 OK 2 1.567 OK
2 0.2836 OK 2 1.567 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.2837 OK 2 -1.53 OK
2 -0.2837 OK 2 -7 OK
= 17392 mm2 OK
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 6.806 OK 2 33.89 OK
2 6.806 OK 2 33.89 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.6125 OK 2 -108.8 OK
2 -0.6125 OK 2 -108.8 OK
No. of piles n = 2
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.20 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 18158 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
Oasys Results
Concrete stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 0.3362 OK 2 1.857 OK
2 0.3362 OK 2 1.857 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.3371 OK 2 -1.818 OK
2 -0.3371 OK 2 -1.818 OK
= 14165 mm2 OK
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 6.795 OK 2 33.19 OK
2 6.795 OK 2 33.19 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.6111 OK 2 -117.2 OK
2 -0.6111 OK 2 -117.2 OK
No. of piles n = 2
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.20 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 18158 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
Oasys Results
Concrete stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 0.4138 OK 2 2.286 OK
2 0.4138 OK 2 2.286 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.414 OK 2 -2.232 OK
2 -0.414 OK 2 -2.232 OK
= 14165 mm2 OK
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 8.097 OK 2 39.28 OK
2 8.097 OK 2 39.28 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.6106 OK 2 -143.3 OK
2 -0.6106 OK 2 -143.3 OK
No. of piles n = 2
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.20 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 18158 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rajesh
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
Oasys Results
Concrete stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 0.367 OK 2 2.028 OK
2 0.367 OK 2 2.028 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.3666 OK 2 -1.976 OK
2 -0.3666 OK 2 -1.976 OK
= 14165 mm2 OK
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
2 6.151 OK 2 30.17 OK
2 6.151 OK 2 30.17 OK
Minima Minima
2 -0.6114 OK 2 -104.4 OK
2 -0.6114 OK 2 -104.4 OK
PILE CAP FOR GROUPS PG1, PG1B, PG1C, PG1D & PG1E
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Nikhil
Doc No - Checked Reyaz
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
No. of piles n = 1
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
No. of piles n = 1
Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
No. of piles n = 4
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.00 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 44685 mm2 OK
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
Oasys Results
Case N M Mu M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima
1 0.0 18120 2228 0.813 OK
Minima
1 0.0 18120 2228 0.813 OK
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 9.453 OK 1 46.97 OK
1 9.453 OK 1 46.97 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.5991 OK 1 -179.7 OK
1 -0.5991 OK 1 -179.7 OK
= 44685 mm2 OK
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
Oasys Results
Case N M Mu M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima
1 0.0 18120 2228 0.813 OK
Minima
1 0.0 18120 2228 0.813 OK
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 9.453 OK 1 46.97 OK
1 9.453 OK 1 46.97 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.5991 OK 1 -179.7 OK
1 -0.5991 OK 1 -179.7 OK
= 0.045 m2
Percentage of tensile steel provided 100As/(b.d) = 0.706 %
Shear stress = Vu /(b . d) = 463.97 kN/sqm
Grade of concrete = C50
Design shear resistance is calculated as per Cl. 3.11.4.4, pg. 82, BS 8110-1: 1997.
Shear strength of concrete, vc = 0.48 MPa
480 kN/sqm
Vus = Vu - vc b d = -101.52 kN
Requirement of shear reinforcement = Not Required
A1
SCHEDULE OF BEAM
NOTES
NORTH
NOTES:
DIRECTOR OF
CONSTRUCTION
AS SHOWN 1/STN/STR/3001 4 T
DESIGNED BY
PROJECT MANAGER
PT. AECOM INDONESIA 1-STN-STR-3001-4.DWG
FATMAWATI STATION
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
A1
SCHEDULE OF COLUMNS
COLUMN LAYOUT AT GROUND LEVEL
NORTH
NOTES:
DIRECTOR OF
CONSTRUCTION
AS SHOWN 1/STN/STR/3002 4 T
DESIGNED BY
PROJECT MANAGER
PT. AECOM INDONESIA 1-STN-STR-3002-4.DWG
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
STAIRCASE
FUTURE L1S01
ESCALATOR 1 FEATURE WALL
200 THK.
RCC WALL
(TYP) ESCALATOR PIT
STAIRCASE L2S04
STAIRCASE L1S02
A1
FEATURE WALL
4
IN CONJUNCTION WITH LATEST REVISION OF:
FRAMING PLAN AT CONCOURSE AT +45.90M ( T.O.C. ) LEVEL
SCHEDULE OF BEAM SCHEDULE OF COLUMNS
STRUCTURE REFERENCE DRAWING:
4
NOTES:-
NORTH
NOTES:
STAIRCASE L1S03
OPENING FOR
ESCALATOR
ESCALATOR PIT
C
17
A 17
TANK-1
TANK-2
OPENING FOR
ESCALATOR
A1
STAIRCASE L1S04
FEATURE WALL
4 FRAMING PLAN AT CONCOURSE AT +45.90M ( T.O.C. ) LEVEL
SCHEDULE OF COLUMNS
SCHEDULE OF BEAM
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS DRAWING NO.
NOTES:-
4
4
NORTH
NOTES:
BEAM SCHEDULE
B
A
4
A1
NORTH
A1
NOTES:
DIRECTOR OF
CONSTRUCTION
AS SHOWN 1/STN/STR/3005 4 T
DESIGNED BY
PROJECT MANAGER
PT. AECOM INDONESIA 1-STN-STR-3005-4.DWG
SCHEDULE OF COLUMNS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4
B SCHEDULE OF BEAM
STEEL ROOF
A1
FRAMING PLAN AT PLATFORM LEVEL TOC +51.650
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 FATMAWATI STATION
C 4
STEEL ROOF
A1
NOTES:
DIRECTOR OF
CONSTRUCTION
AS SHOWN 1/STN/STR/3006 4 T
DESIGNED BY
PROJECT MANAGER
PT. AECOM INDONESIA 1-STN-STR-3006-4.DWG
4
NOTES:-
NOTES:
NOTES:
NOTES:-
NOTES:
4
4
LEGENDS:-
NOTES:
DIRECTOR OF
CONSTRUCTION
AS SHOWN 1/STN/STR/3010 4 T
DESIGNED BY
PROJECT MANAGER
PT. AECOM INDONESIA 1-STN-STR-3010-4.DWG
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
B 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4
3
A
A1
1 1 2 2
3 3
3 4
NOTES:
5 5
1 2 1 2 1 2
B 3 4 3 4 3 4
A
SECTION 5-5
3
SECTION 4-4
A1
SECTION 6-6
NORTH
NOTES:
1 2 3 4 6
1
1 1 1 1 1
A
A A
A
SECTION 7-7
1 2 3 4 6
PLAN SHOWING PILES LAYOUT PLAN SHOWING PILES LAYOUT PLAN SHOWING PILES LAYOUT PLAN SHOWING PILES LAYOUT PLAN SHOWING PILES LAYOUT
FOR PILE GROUP PG2B FOR PILE GROUP PG2C FOR PILE GROUP PG2D FOR PILE GROUP PG2E FOR PILE GROUP PG2F
NOTES:-
11
5 1 5
A
STRUCTURE REFERENCE DRAWING:
7
PG1F PILE LAYOUT PLAN
PLAN SHOWING PILE LAYOUT
SECTION 5-5 SECTION 6-6 FOR PILE GROUP PG1C
NOTES:
1 2 4
3
1
1 1
A1
A
3
4
PLAN SHOWING PILE LAYOUT
A A
FOR PILE GROUP PG1D PLAN SHOWING PILE LAYOUT
FOR PILE GROUP PG1E
1 2
PLAN SHOWING PILES LAYOUT PLAN SHOWING PILES LAYOUT
FOR PILE GROUP PG2G FOR PILE GROUP PG2H
NOTES:
1 1
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
FOR SINGLE BARS
3 3
NOTES:
1 1
2 2
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
FOR SINGLE BARS
** DEPTH OF PILE CAP
5
NOTES:
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
6 6
5 5
2
2
NOTES:
1 1
2 2
3 3
5 5
4 4
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
FOR 2 BUNDLE BARS
** DEPTH OF PILE CAP
1
NOTES:
1 1
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
** DEPTH OF PILE CAP FOR 2 BUNDLE BARS
4 4
2 2
3 3
1
1
NOTES:
LONGITUDINAL
AXIS
1 1 LONGITUDINAL 3
1 AXIS
A A
2
SECTION 1-1
SECTION 2-2
LEGEND :
NOTES:
LONGITUDINAL
AXIS
LONGITUDINAL
1 2 AXIS
1 1
3 4
A A
2
B 3
C C
3
SECTION 1-1
LEGEND :
SECTION 2-2
NOTES:
LONGITUDINAL
AXIS
1 1 LONGITUDINAL
1 AXIS
A A
2
SECTION 1-1
SECTION 2-2
LEGEND :
NOTES:
LONGITUDINAL
AXIS 3
LONGITUDINAL
1 1 AXIS
1
A A
2
SECTION 1-1
LEGEND :
SECTION 2-2
NOTES:
SECTION 1-1
LEGEND :
NOTES:
1 1
2
PG4A PILE LAYOUT PLAN
SECTION 1-1
1
LEGEND :
1
SECTION 2-2 1
NOTES:
LONGITUDINAL
1 AXIS
1 1
A A A
1
1
LEGEND :
NOTES:
1
LONGITUDINAL
1 1 AXIS
A
A A
15 17
1 1 1 B
A A
1
LEGEND :
NOTES:
2 2 1 1
LONGITUDINAL 1
3
PLAN SHOWING PILE LAYOUT
FOR PILE GROUP PG1E
LEGEND :
SECTION 3-3
NOTES:
LONGITUDINAL
AXIS
1 1
A A
2
SECTION 1-1
NOTES:-
LEGEND :
SECTION 2-2
NOTES: