Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Station Enlargement)
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev E-A6
DOCUMENT/DRAWING TECHNICAL
VERIFICATION AND REVISION RECORD
APPROVED
PREPARED
/DESIGNED
CHECKED
DATE OF
REV. No.
DESCRIPTION
5 10-09- SG NB JC
2015 Revised Gridline B Foundation for Enlarged Station
6 06-10- SG NB JC
Revised Gridline B Foundation as per Design
2015
8 09-11- Revised Gridline A Foundation for 1.2m Water Pipe & Gridline A1/A2 SG NB JC
2015 Foundation for Enlarged Station
9- 17-03- Revised Foundation for Staircases L1S02 & L1S04 due to station SG NB JC
A1 2016 enlargement
9- 31-03- Revised Foundation for Staircases L1SO3 & L1S05 due to station SG NB JC
A3 2016 enlargement
9- 08-04- Revised Foundation for Escalator L1E02, Lift L1L01 & Lift L1L02 due to SG NB JC
A4 2016 station enlargement
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev A-A6
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4
1.1 Scope of Report .......................................................................................................4
1.2 Design Package Affiliation ......................................................................................4
2. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT.................................................................................5
2.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................5
3. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................5
List of Tables
Table 1 – Design Package Affiliation ......................................................................................4
TWJO-1-TCD-ST1-0004-Rev A-A6
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
1. INTRODUCTION
This report shall be read in conjunction with the previously submitted LBS
Foundation Design Report AECOM-1-TCD-ST1-0004 Rev9.
The intent of this Addendum Report is to design of Piles & Pile Caps for Escalator
L1E02 and revised design of Lift piles and pile caps for L1L01 & L1L02 due to
enlargement of station.
The technical design of Lebak Bulus Station design had been completed and the
design approved. However, due to unforeseen circumstances in which the authority
now requires the road underneath the station to be widened, the column positions
have been shifted to the sidewalk of the widened road, resulting in an enlarged
station. Row of columns at gridline C has been moved to gridline C1, resulting in a
span change from grid line B from 9.50m to 13.50m. Columns along gridline A1
have also been shifted to gridline A2 to cater for accesses.
The revised design of piles and pile caps for Lift L1L01 and L1L02 and design of
piles and pile caps for Escalator L1L02 of Lebak Bulus Station are covered in this
report.
The following table shows the relationship of this package to other design packages
of Lebak Bulus Station. Design packages of CP101 and CP102 are divided into
segments in accordance with Appendix 22 of Employer’s Requirement.
2. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT
2.1 Methodology
Structural elements of the station were modeled with their true material and section
properties. For the normal loading conditions a linear-elastic model was used to
assess the effect of the forces.
The lateral soil interaction with the pile structure is modelled as lateral soil springs.
The first soil spring was modelled at 1m below the pile cap bottom & 50% of the
spring value was applied at pile cap bottom node to account for the passive earth
resistance of the pile cap.
Under Seismic loading conditions, a linear-elastic dynamic analysis was used to
assess the response of the structure to the response spectrum under Operating
Design Earthquake (ODE) and Maximum Design Earthquake (MDE). Directional
combinations of the earthquake motions were taken into account in accordance with
EN1998-2 requirements.
3. CONCLUSION
The analysis model has been updated as per the latest set of architectural drawings
and the design of Foundation for Escalator L1E02 and revised design of Foundation
for Lift L1L01 & L1L02has been carried out.
The revised reinforcement detailing has been covered in the following enclosed
drawings:
Appendix A
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 38149 1001 1DL36731
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA -23.062
+ 1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 -0.001 0.723
Min Fx 38149 1001 1DL36731
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA -23.062
+ 1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 -0.001 0.723
Max Fy 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Min Fy 38166 1001 1DL36730
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA -45.325
+ 1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 -0.001 -111.365
Max Fz 38152 1001 1DL36734
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA +-8.903
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 -0.001 54.02
Min Fz 38172 1001 1DL36753
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 0.749
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -2.766
Max Mx 38149 1001 1DL36731
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA -23.062
+ 1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 -0.001 0.723
Min Mx 38149 1001 1DL36731
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA -23.062
+ 1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 -0.001 0.723
Max My 38164 1001 1DL36747
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 5.803
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 10.049
Min My 38166 1001 1DL36730
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA -45.325
+ 1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 -0.001 -111.365
Max Mz 38155 1001 1DL36738
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA +-1.624
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 73.772
Min Mz 38166 1001 1DL36730
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA -45.325
+ 1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 -0.001 -111.365
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 679.7 1345 1554 0.865 OK
Minima 1121 358.5 1661 0.216 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Min Fx 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Max Fy 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Min Fy 38176 1001 1DL36757
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + -0.86
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -2.01
Max Fz 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Min Fz 38172 1001 1DL36753
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 0.749
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -2.766
Max Mx 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Min Mx 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Max My 38164 1001 1DL36747
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 5.803
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 10.049
Min My 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Max Mz 38160 1001 1DL36742
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 8.871
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 48.444
Min Mz 38172 1001 1DL36754
+ 1SIDL +856.448
1CL + 1PLA + 0.749
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -3.515
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 513.91 453.196
Skin Friction (kN) 959.33
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 1128 266.4 874.5 0.305 OK
Minima 0 44.34 495.3 0.090 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 20.97 OK
Minima -6.915 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.7595 m
Hence de = 0.742 m and dv = 0.668 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 216 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 554 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 10568 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0053 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.792 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 216 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 38252 1001 1DL36839
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA +43.944
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 239.846
Min Fx 38252 1001 1DL36839
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA +43.944
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 239.846
Max Fy 38269 1001 1DL36838
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 50.07
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 385.875
Min Fy 38268 1001 1DL36855
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + -4.95
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -22.784
Max Fz 38256 1001 1DL36843
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA +30.741
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 84.002
Min Fz 38269 1001 1DL36838
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 50.07
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 385.875
Max Mx 38252 1001 1DL36839
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA +43.944
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 239.846
Min Mx 38252 1001 1DL36839
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA +43.944
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 239.846
Max My 38268 1001 1DL36856
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + -4.95
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -17.833
Min My 38269 1001 1DL36857
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 50.07
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 335.605
Max Mz 38269 1001 1DL36838
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 50.07
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 385.875
Min Mz 38262 1001 1DL36850
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -37.792
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 0.785 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.318 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 1059 990.5 1367 0.725 OK
Minima 498.3 278.6 1221 0.228 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.069 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 38262 1001 1DL36849
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -35.231
Min Fx 38262 1001 1DL36849
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -35.231
Max Fy 38262 1001 1DL36849
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -35.231
Min Fy 38268 1001 1DL36855
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + -4.95
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -22.784
Max Fz 38262 1001 1DL36849
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -35.231
Min Fz 38276 1001 1DL36862
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA +-1.685
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -2.47
Max Mx 38262 1001 1DL36849
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -35.231
Min Mx 38262 1001 1DL36849
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -35.231
Max My 38268 1001 1DL36856
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + -4.95
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -17.833
Min My 38262 1001 1DL36849
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -35.231
Max Mz 38278 1001 1DL36865
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + -0.33
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 0.45
Min Mz 38262 1001 1DL36850
+ 1SIDL +924.663
1CL + 1PLA + 2.56
1.1TLA + 1.1BTA
0 0 0 -37.792
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) 561.81 498.332
Skin Friction (kN) 959.33
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 0.00
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima 613.5 508.3 709.2 0.717 OK
Minima 1308 143.5 929.2 0.154 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 38.55 OK
Minima -268.9 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.7615 m
Hence de = 0.742 m and dv = 0.668 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 384 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 1200 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.00 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 7854 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = A s = 0.0039 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 0.588 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 384 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Rahul
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31670 1005 1DL30730
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA +61.529
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-32.75
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA 146.613
+ 1.1BTB 123.617
Min Fx 31639 1005 1DL30699
+ 1SIDL +881.059
1CL + 1PLA +53.605
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-29.751
+ 1.1TLB-9.431
+ 1.1BTA 140.958
+ 1.1BTB 90.618
Max Fy 31687 1005 1DL30729
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA +94.374
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-42.408
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
264.4 372.549
Min Fy 31687 1006 1DL30729
+ 1SIDL +1456.837
1CL + 1PLA -32.784
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-74.02
+ 1.1TLB17.655
- 1.1BTA -514.565
1.1BTB 42.544
Max Fz 31655 1006 1DL30715
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
5.407+ 1.1TLA
11.343
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
-69.46 10.375
Min Fz 31656 1006 1DL30698
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA -16.644
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-91.263
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA -602.772
1.1BTB 113.495
Max Mx 31639 1006 1DL30699
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA +-1.427
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-72.255
+ 1.1TLB28.29
- 1.1BTA -347.225
1.1BTB 146.445
Min Mx 31670 1005 1DL30730
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA +61.529
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-32.75
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA 146.613
+ 1.1BTB 123.617
Max My 31656 1006 1DL30698
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA -16.644
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-91.263
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA -602.772
1.1BTB 113.495
Min My 31649 1006 1DL30710
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
12.25+ 1.1TLA
-4.156
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA-100.869
- 1.1BTB 57.709
Max Mz 31687 1005 1DL30729
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA +94.374
1PLB + 1.1TLA
-42.408
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA + 1.1BTB
264.4 372.549
Min Mz 31678 1005 1DL30739
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
1.39+ 1.1TLA
-7.509
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-44.758
1.1BTB -164.163
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
From Table 9.6N, pg. 168, EN 1992-1-1: 2004 (E), recommended minimum longitudinal reinforcement area
Here, Ac = 1.131 m2
Therefore, minimum percentage of reinforcement required, As,bpmin = 0.250 %
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -4574 3196 4338 0.737 OK
Minima 7079 1071 6442 0.166 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.020 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31691 1005 1DL30750
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -12.599
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.153
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-21.193
1.1BTB -39.681
Min Fx 31660 1005 1DL30719
+ 1SIDL +881.059
1CL + 1PLA -11.304
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.532
+ 1.1TLB-9.431
+ 1.1BTA +-19.259
1.1BTB -34.555
Max Fy 31691 1006 1DL30750
+ 1SIDL +1456.837
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
5.277+ 1.1TLA
8.716
+ 1.1TLB17.655
- 1.1BTA --38.831
1.1BTB 7.823
Min Fy 31691 1005 1DL30750
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -12.599
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.153
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-21.193
1.1BTB -39.681
Max Fz 31660 1006 1DL30719
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
3.161+ 1.1TLA
10.913
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA --46.779
1.1BTB 0.786
Min Fz 31699 1005 1DL30758
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.529+ 1.1TLA
0.083
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA + -0.083
1.1BTB 0.529
Max Mx 31660 1006 1DL30719
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
3.161+ 1.1TLA
10.913
+ 1.1TLB28.29
- 1.1BTA --46.779
1.1BTB 0.786
Min Mx 31691 1005 1DL30750
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -12.599
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.153
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-21.193
1.1BTB -39.681
Max My 31668 1005 1DL30728
+ 1SIDL + 881.059
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.538+ 1.1TLA0.11
+ 1.1TLB-9.431
+ 1.1BTA + 1.1BTB0 0
Min My 31660 1006 1DL30719
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
3.161+ 1.1TLA
10.913
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA --46.779
1.1BTB 0.786
Max Mz 31691 1006 1DL30750
+ 1SIDL +1456.837
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
5.277+ 1.1TLA
8.716
+ 1.1TLB17.655
- 1.1BTA --38.831
1.1BTB 7.823
Min Mz 31691 1005 1DL30750
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -12.599
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.153
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-21.193
1.1BTB -39.681
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -3301.01 -4658.4
Skin Friction (kN) 3790.00
Final Axial Load (kN) 0.00 -868.40
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -670 413.5 802.4 0.515 OK
Minima 6359 226 2903 0.078 OK
From Oasys,
Stress in Reinforcement
Case
[N/mm²]
Maxima 42.37 OK
Minima -53.59 OK
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
As per Cl. C5.2.8.9, pg. 5-64, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2012,
Effective depth to be considered in the shear check
dv = 0.9 de
where de = D/2 + Dr
D = Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Dr = Dia of circle passing through the centres of longitudinal reinforcement
= 0.954 m
Hence de = 0.904 m and dv = 0.813 m
Horizontal resultant shear force at the section, Vu = 966 kN
Corresponding axial compressive force, N = 0 kN
Eff. width to be taken = diameter of section = bv = 1.20 m
Total vertical reinforcement at the section = 40212 mm2
Effective area of tensile steel = 50% of total steel = As = 0.0201 m2
Percentage of tensile reinforcement = 100 As /(bv . dv) = 2.060 %
Horizontal shear force, Vu = 966 kN
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31680 1005 1DL30740
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -10.302
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.017
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-48.615
1.1BTB -158.734
Min Fx 31649 1005 1DL30709
+ 1SIDL +881.059
1CL + 1PLA -10.349
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.549
+ 1.1TLB-9.431
+ 1.1BTA +-40.715
1.1BTB -145.871
Max Fy 31680 1006 1DL30740
+ 1SIDL +1456.837
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
13.59+ 1.1TLA
-4.866
+ 1.1TLB17.655
- 1.1BTA --72.427
1.1BTB 95.409
Min Fy 31684 1005 1DL30744
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -16.973
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.757
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-42.188
1.1BTB -102.757
Max Fz 31655 1006 1DL30715
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
5.407+ 1.1TLA
11.343
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
-69.46 10.375
Min Fz 31680 1006 1DL30740
+ 1SIDL +1456.837
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
13.59+ 1.1TLA
-4.866
+ 1.1TLB17.655
- 1.1BTA --72.427
1.1BTB 95.409
Max Mx 31649 1006 1DL30709
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
12.25+ 1.1TLA
-4.156
+ 1.1TLB28.29
- 1.1BTA --96.713
1.1BTB 69.958
Min Mx 31680 1005 1DL30740
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -10.302
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.017
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-48.615
1.1BTB -158.734
Max My 31668 1005 1DL30728
+ 1SIDL + 881.059
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.538+ 1.1TLA0.11
+ 1.1TLB-9.431
+ 1.1BTA + 1.1BTB0 0
Min My 31649 1006 1DL30710
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
12.25+ 1.1TLA
-4.156
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA-100.869
- 1.1BTB 57.709
Max Mz 31680 1006 1DL30740
+ 1SIDL +1456.837
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
13.59+ 1.1TLA
-4.866
+ 1.1TLB17.655
- 1.1BTA --72.427
1.1BTB 95.409
Min Mz 31680 1005 1DL30740
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -10.302
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
-1.017
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-48.615
1.1BTB -158.734
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -3301.01 -4658.4
Skin Friction (kN) 1847.33
Final Axial Load (kN) -1453.68 -2811.06
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -2633 1640 2167 0.757 OK
Minima 6982 936.6 4408 0.213 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
Static - LC 1001-1006
Beam L/C Node Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
Max Fx 31686 1005 1DL30746
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -15.476
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.505
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-32.115
1.1BTB -69.254
Min Fx 31655 1005 1DL30715
+ 1SIDL +881.059
1CL + 1PLA +-14.06
1PLB + 1.1TLA
4.738
+ 1.1TLB-9.431
+ 1.1BTA +-28.718
1.1BTB -61.338
Max Fy 31686 1006 1DL30746
+ 1SIDL +1456.837
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
7.945+ 1.1TLA
8.816
+ 1.1TLB17.655
- 1.1BTA --56.599
1.1BTB 22.293
Min Fy 31686 1005 1DL30746
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -15.476
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.505
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-32.115
1.1BTB -69.254
Max Fz 31655 1006 1DL30715
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
5.407+ 1.1TLA
11.343
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
-69.46 10.375
Min Fz 31699 1005 1DL30758
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.529+ 1.1TLA
0.083
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA + -0.083
1.1BTB 0.529
Max Mx 31655 1006 1DL30715
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
5.407+ 1.1TLA
11.343
+ 1.1TLB28.29
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
-69.46 10.375
Min Mx 31686 1005 1DL30746
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -15.476
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.505
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-32.115
1.1BTB -69.254
Max My 31668 1005 1DL30728
+ 1SIDL + 881.059
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
0.538+ 1.1TLA0.11
+ 1.1TLB-9.431
+ 1.1BTA + 1.1BTB0 0
Min My 31655 1006 1DL30715
+ 1SIDL +1608.486
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
5.407+ 1.1TLA
11.343
+ 1.1TLB 28.29
- 1.1BTA - 1.1BTB
-69.46 10.375
Max Mz 31686 1006 1DL30746
+ 1SIDL +1456.837
1CL + 1PLA + 1PLB
7.945+ 1.1TLA
8.816
+ 1.1TLB17.655
- 1.1BTA --56.599
1.1BTB 22.293
Min Mz 31686 1005 1DL30746
+ 1SIDL +2211.878
1CL + 1PLA -15.476
+ 1PLB + 1.1TLA
5.505
+ 1.1TLB
-13.857
+ 1.1BTA +-32.115
1.1BTB -69.254
ODE MDE
Maximum Tension Force (kN) -3301.01 -4658.4
Skin Friction (kN) 2665.33
Final Axial Load (kN) -635.68 -1993.06
Design checks for ULS adequacy, SLS stresses and surface crack width have been checked in Oasys.
Reinforcement Provided
N M Mu
Case M/Mu
[kN] [kNm] [kNm]
Maxima -1795 717 1045 0.686 OK
Minima 7079 479.9 3456 0.139 OK
Project JMRT
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Jai
Doc. No. - Checked Varun
Title Design of Piles Verified Sumant
From Table 1, pg. 7, BS 5400-4: 1990, for buried parts of structure with severe exposure,
Permissible Crack Width = 0.250 mm
Maximum Crack Width per Face from Oasys = 0.000 mm OK
TOKYU-WIKA JOINT OPERATION
Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit Projects CP101 Lebak Bulus Station Foundation Design
Appendix B
No. of piles n = 1
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Size of Column = 2.80 m x 0.90 m
Grade of concrete = C40/50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
No. of piles n = 2
Dia of pile = 1.20 m
Centre to centre distance of pile = 3.60 m
Grade of concrete = C50
Grade of steel = Fe390
Clear cover to the reinforcement = 75 mm
= 20376 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Jai
Doc No - Checked Varun
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.2 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Longitudinal Direction
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 4.425 OK 1 23.18 OK
1 4.425 OK 1 23.18 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.581 OK 1 -112.4 OK
1 -0.581 OK 1 -112.4 OK
= 20352 mm2 OK
Project JMRT Sheet
Client TWJO
Job Design of Stations
Station Lebak Bulus Prepared Jai
Doc No - Checked Varun
Title Design of Pile Caps Verified Sumant
2.4 Moment Capacity, Stress and Crack width check from Oasys for Transverse Direction
b) Stress Check:
Permissible stresses
Concrete 0.5fck 25.000 MPa
Steel 0.75fy 292.500 MPa
Oasys Results
Section Material stresses at SLS Loads Reinforcement stresses at SLS Loads
Case Stress Case Stress
[N/mm²] [N/mm²]
Maxima Maxima
1 4.892 OK 1 25.43 OK
1 4.892 OK 1 25.43 OK
Minima Minima
1 -0.5808 OK 1 -128.5 OK
1 -0.5808 OK 1 -128.5 OK
Appendix C
1
1
1
1
1
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 13.5 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe AC3 Unit End Bearing 2115 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 47 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 1,745 1,351 1,756 4,295 901 1,317 1,756
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static 7,854 kN
ODE 7,854 kN
MDE 12,566 kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 1,351 kN Static (kN) 925 OK 0
ODE 1,756 kN ODE (kN) 1245 OK 0
MDE 4,295 kN MDE (kN) 1308 OK 0
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : xxx
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 8-Apr-2016
( ) 2
+2 (1 )
= +
2 4
B) END BEARING
Pile Depth 30.0 m Limiting End Bearing 4000 kN/m2
Soil Material at Pile Toe TC Unit End Bearing 2194 kN/m2
SPT-N Value at Pile Toe 48.75 Area of Toe 0.79 m²
End Bearing Multiplier 45
D) GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Factor of Compression Tension
Safety Static Static ODE MDE Static ODE MDE
Skin Friction 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50
End Bearing 2.50 1.00
Geotechnical
Capacity (kN) 4,637 4,935 6,535 11,525 3,290 4,901 6,535
E) STRUCTURAL CAPACITY
Static 7,854 kN
ODE 7,854 kN
MDE 12,566 kN
G) WORKING LOAD
F) PILE CAPACITY Compression Capacity Check Tension Capacity Check
Static 4,637 kN Static (kN) 2212 OK 0
ODE 6,535 kN ODE (kN) 6436 OK 2658 OK
MDE 11,525 kN MDE (kN) 7830 OK 4043 OK
Project : JMRT CP101
Designed : xxx
PILE SETTLEMENT Checked : DAP
Date : 8-Apr-2016
( ) 2
+2 (1 )
= +
2 4
A1
NOTES:
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
B 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4
A1
1 1 2 2
3 3
PG1 PILE LAYOUT PLAN PG1A PILE LAYOUT PLAN
NOTES:-
SECTION 4-4
A
SECTION 1-1 SECTION 2-2
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS DRAWING NO. 4 STRUCTURE REFERENCE DRAWINGS: PG1G & PG1J PILE LAYOUT PLAN
PLAN SHOWING PILE LAYOUT
FOR PILE GROUP PG1C
NOTES:
1
15
A1
C 2
1
* PLAN SHOWING PILE LAYOUT PLAN SHOWING PILE LAYOUT
15 FOR PILE GROUP PG1D FOR PILE GROUP PG1E
1 2 1 2 1 2
B 3 4 3 4 3 4
A1
SECTION 2-2
SECTION 1-1
15
PILE GROUP LAYOUT
STRUCTURE REFERENCE DRAWING:
15
NOTES:-
3 1 3
NOTES:
1 1
13
2 2
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
FOR SINGLE BARS
13
NOTES:
1 1
4
2 2
3 3
4 4
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
FOR 2 BUNDLE BARS
** DEPTH OF PILE CAP
4 4
NOTES:
LONGITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL
AXIS AXIS
1 1 1 1 LONGITUDINAL
1 1 AXIS
A A
2
2
PG1B, PG1H & PG1K PILE LAYOUT PLAN PG1G & PG1J PILE LAYOUT PLAN
7
LEGEND :
NOTES:
LEGEND :
NOTES: