2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta

Two Stories Plane Frames

Model.xmcd

Bandung. Gedung digunakan sebagai Rumah_Sakit.

R=8 ( SMRF)

page : 1
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

1. Data Model Plane Frame Array origin dalam MathCad ORIGIN  1

1 3 3
Ib   0.3 0.5  3.125  10 m Ab  0.3 0.5  0.15 m Young modulus
12 4 2
10
1 4 3 2 Ey  2.574  10 N/m2
Ic   0.4  2.133  10 m Ac  0.4  0.16 m
12 4 2
m1  77284.3718 kg m2  68755.4656 kg h 1  4 m h 2  4 m H  h 1  h 2 B  6 m

a. Coordinates of nodes which define the structure b. Member Incidence

T
0 6 0 6 0 6 m 3 1 3 4 1 2
N    MINC   
8 8 4 4 0 0 4 2 5 6 3 4

c. Area of elements d. Moment of Inertia


A  Ab Ab Ac Ac Ac Ac T m2 
Ix  Ib Ib Ic Ic Ic Ic T m4

f. Joint constrains :
0 - free 0 0 0 titik 1
1 - fixed or locked 0 0 0
  titik 2
JC  
0 0 0 titik 3
0 0 0 titik 4
1 1 1
 titk 5
 
1 1 1 titik 6

Number of Elements
Number of Nodes
n e  cols( MINC) ne  6
nj  rows( N) nj  6

page : 2
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

2. Persiapan Analisis Struktur dengan Cara Matrik

2.1. Member Code Matrix

0 0 9 9 10 10 
1 5 1 3 5 7 
 
MCODE   
2 6 2 4 6 8
0 0 0 0 9 9 
3 7 0 0 1 3

 
4 8 0 0 2 4 
2.2. Number of Degree of Freedoms

dof  max( MCODE) dof  10

3. Membentuk Matriks Kekakuan Elemen dalam sumbu global

Untuk setiap elemen i=1...NE dilakukan perhitungan :

i  1  n e

L  J  MINC
i 1 i
 i
2
K  MINC Ey  Ix A L
2 i i i
α  β 
i i
Li
3 Ix
   
2 2 i
L N N  N N
K 1 J 1 K 2 J 2

c  J  MINC s  J  MINC
i 1 i i 1 i
K  MINC K  MINC
2 i 2 i
N N N N
K 1 J 1 K 2 J 2
c s
L L
i i

 ci s 0
i
0 0 0
 
 si c 0
i
0 0 0
 
Λ  Λ  
0 0 1 0 0 0
i 0 0 0 c s 0
i i
 
0 0 0 s c 0 
i i
 
0 0 0 0 0 1

page : 3
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

Menghitung Matrik K( i)  cc

i
Kekakuan Elemen dalam
koor. global ... ss
i

g 1  α   β  c  12 s
2 2
i  i 
g 2  α  c s β  12
i  i 
g 3  α   β  s  12 c
2 2
i  i 
g 4  α  6  L  s
i i
g5  α  6 L  c
i i

 i
2
g6  α  4 L
i

g7  α  2  L 
2
i i

 g1 g2 g4 g 1 g 2 g 4 
 
 g2 g3 g5 g 2 g 3 g5 
g g5 g6 g 4 g 5 g7 
K 
4
 g 1 g 2 g 4 g 1 g2 g 4 
 
 g 2 g 3 g 5 g 2 g3 g 5 
g g 4 g 5

 4 g5 g7 g6

K

4. Membentuk Matriks Kekakuan Struktur, SS

4.1. Initialisasi Matrik Kekakuan Struktur agar isi = NOL
SS  for I  1  dof
for J  1  dof
SS 0
I J
SS
I J
SS

page : 4
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

4.2. Membentuk Matriks Kekakuan Struktur, SS

SS  for N  1  n e

for JE  1  6
if MCODE 0
JE N
for IE  1  JE
if MCODE 0
IE N
I  MCODE
IE N
J  MCODE
JE N
SS  SS  K( N)
I J I J IE JE
SS  SS
J I I J
SS
I J
SS
I J
SS

5. Matrik Kekakuan Lateral, KL:

Building Model
In Code Based Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure
STATIC CONDENSATION
 K m ,m K m ,n  U m  0 
    
 K n ,m K n ,n  U n   Fn 
K m ,m U m  K m ,n U n  0
K n ,m U m  K n ,n U n  Fn
Rearrange U m   K m1,m .K m, n .U n
Plug into K n ,nU n  K n ,m K m1, m K m ,nU n  Fn
Simplify  K n ,n  ( K n ,m K m1, m K m ,n )  U n  Fn

K  K n ,n  ( K n ,m K m1, m K m,n )

presented by Djoni Simanta, Ir., MT

page : 5
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

KMM  submatrix( SS 1 8 1 8 ) KMN  submatrix( SS 1 8 9 10)

KNM  submatrix( SS 9 10 1 8 ) KNN  submatrix( SS 9 10 9 10)

 3.467  107 1.5  107 


KL1  KNN  KNM KMM
1 
 KMN  


7 7
 1.5  10 1.132  10 

 6.934  107 3  107 

KL  2  KL1    N/m ndin  rows( KL)  2
 7 7
 3  10 2.263  10 
6. Menghitung Massa

 m1 0   7.728  104 0  Kg

M  
 0 m2   4
 0 6.876  10 

7. Eigen Analysis
Dengan perintah umum dalam Mathcad

 1.113  103 
λ  genvals( KL M ) λ  
 113.161 
 ω1  min λ1  λ2 ω1  10.638 rad/s

ω2  max λ  λ  ω2  33.365 rad/s

1 2

2 π 2 π
T1  T1  0.591 s T2  T2  0.188 s
ω1 ω2

Menghitung eigen vectors dari persamaan karakteristik

Dengan perintah umum dari Mathcad

 1 0.495  1 2 2 1

b  genvecs( KL M ) b   a  b a  b
 0.556 1 
 0.495 1 
a  
 1 0.556 

page : 6
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

MODE SHAPE
Mode-1

Mode - 2

page : 7
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

1
Mode shape di normalisir I     0.495 1 
1 a  
a  1 0.556 
1 1
ϕ 
1 1
2 3
M  a 2
 k k  k 1 
 1.672  10

ϕ
1 1
k1

a
2 1
ϕ  3
2 1 ϕ  3.377  10
2 2 1
M  a 2
  k k  k 1 
k1

a
1 2 3
ϕ  ϕ  3.185  10
1 2 1 2
2
M  a 2
  k k  k 2 
k1
a
2 2
ϕ   1.672  10 3 3.185  10 3 
ϕ 
2 2
2
M  a 2   3
  k k  k 2 
3
 3.377  10 1.772  10 
k1

Cara lain dengan operasi Matriks Kolom untuk setiap mode ke-n :
1
1  1.672  10 
1 a 3
ϕ 
ϕ 
1T 1   3
a  M a  3.377  10 
2
2 a
2  3.185  10 3 
ϕ 
ϕ   
2T 2   3
a  M a  1.772  10 

 1.672  10 3 3.185  10 3  sehingga

ϕ  T 1 0
 3  3 Mn  ϕ  M  ϕ Mn   
 3.377  10 1.772  10  0 1

8. Faktor Partisipasi Modal

T  361.371  mode 1 merupakan Fundamental Mode
Ln  ϕ  M  I Ln   
 124.3 
9. Effective Modal Mass
g  9.8 4 4
M  7.728  10 M  6.876  10
1 1 2 2
a. Effective Weights

1T 1 2T 2

M m1  ϕ  M ϕ M m2  ϕ  M ϕ M m1  1 M m2  1

page : 8
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

Ln1 1 Ln2 1

2 2

W1  g W2  g W1  1279774.837288 W2  151415.569
M m1 M m2

 
6 6
wt  m1  m2  g wt  1.431  10 N W1  W2  1.431  10 N
cocok, karena semua
mode dipakai
b. Effective Modal Mass
2 W1
  
2 5
MT  Ln MT  1.46  10  0.894
k 1 wt
k1

EMM   MT   100 EMM  100 persen, artinya semua mode digunakan

 2 
 
  M
k k 
k 1 

SNI 03-1726-02 mensyaratkan agar jumlah mode yg digunakan jumlahnya

sedemikian rupa sehingga EMM > 90 %.

10.Response Spectra Analysis

Medan, Tanah sedang (Site Class D):

Rumah Sakit Ie  1.5 SDC: D R  8 Tabel 9 SNI 1726

TL  20 detik
Check SNI 1726 Ss  0.652 S1  0.360 Fa  1.278 Fv  1.940

SMS  Fa Ss  0.833 SM1  Fv  S1  0.698

2 2
SDS   SMS  0.556 SD1   SM1  0.466
3 3
SD1
Ts  Ts  0.838 To  0.2 Ts
SDS

10.1. Menghitung Koefisien Gempa Nominal,Cm

 0.6 Tm  SDS  Ie
 
C Tm   0.4   if 0  Tm  To
 To
 R

   
Ie m
SDS  if To  Tm  Ts C T1  0.104 Sa1  C T1  g Sa1  1.021
R 2
s
SD1 Ie
   
m
if Ts  Tm C T2  0.104 Sa2  C T2  g Sa2  1.021
Tm R s
2

page : 9
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

10.2. Deflection Control:

CD  5.5
 361.371   361.371 0 
Ln    Ln  diag( Ln ) Ln   
 124.3   0 124.3 
a. Base Nominal hasil analisis dinamik

 Sa1 0   4.766  104 3.123  104  N

SA  FJ  M  ϕ Ln  SA   
 0 Sa2   4 4
 8.564  10 1.546  10 

V  ( 1 1 )  FJ 
V  1.333  10
5
1.577  10
4 N
Complete Quadratic Combinations :
3
ω1 2  12 0 
1  r) r
ζ  0.05 r  
8  ζ  (Mn   1.0 ρ  1.0
ρ
1 2  0 1 ρ
1 1 2 2
1  r2
ω2 2
2 2
 4ζ  r ( 1  r) ρ  ρ
2 1 1 2
2 2

  V1 nρn mV1 m

5
Vdo  Vdo  1.343  10 N
n 1 m 1

b. Lendutan lateral τ harus matriks diagonal:

 Sa1 
0 
ω 2   3 
CD
 1   0.02 1.331  10 
qL   ϕ Ln   m
Ie  Sa2    4
 0   0.04 7.407  10 
 ω2 
2
 
c. Simpangan antara tingkat :

Δ  qL Δ  qL
1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2
 0.02 1.331  10 3 
  m
Δ
2 1 
 qL
2 1
 qL
1 1  Δ
2 2
 qL
2 2
 qL
1 2
Δ
  3
 0.02 2.072  10 
Complete Quadratic Combinations :

 2 2 

    1 n n m 1 m
Δ ρ Δ
n 1 m 1
Δ   
   0.02003 
2 2 Δ   m

   Δ2 n ρn mΔ2 m  0.02047 
 n 1 m 1 

page : 10
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

d. Kontrol kondisi beban ultimate : h 1  4.3 m h 2  3.5m

 0.02   0.02 h 1   0.086 

Δult  Δ Δult    m ΔbatasULT  ΔbatasULT   
 0.02   0.02 h 2   0.07 
m,oke juga
10.3. Faktor Skala untuk desain
ztotal  h 1  h 2

 S1 

Csmin R Ie   max0.044  SDS Ie 0.01 0.5
  R 
if S1  0.6

  I 
  e 

max 0.044  SDS Ie 0.01  otherwise

  SDS SD1  
  
Cs T R Ie  max Csmin R Ie min


 R T R 
  Ie 
  Ie


Menentukan Periode Getar Struktur SNI 1726 Tabel 15

x
Ct  0.0466 x  0.9 Cu  1.4 Ta  Ct ztotal Ta  0.296 second
T1  0.591 second
T  return Ta if T1  Ta

return T1 if Ta  T1  Cu  Ta T yang digunakan


return Cu  Ta  if T1  Cu  Ta T  0.414 second

Moment Resisting Frame:

 
5
R  8 Ie  1.5 Cs  Cs T R Ie Vs  Cs wt Vs  1.491  10 N

 Vs 
fD  max 1 fD  1.11
 Vdo

10.4. Gross Responses

a. Gaya Lateral Ekwivalen

FJ  FJ fD
 2 2 

    1 n n m 1 m
FJ ρ  FJ
 5.289  104 3.466  104  n 1 m 1
FJ    FCQC   
 4 4  2 2 
 9.505  10 1.716  10  
   FJ2 n ρn mFJ2 m
 n 1 m 1 
page : 11
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 6.34  10N4 
FCQC   
 4
 9.648  10 

b. Gaya geser dasar nominal dan momen guling


Vd  ( 1 1 )  FJ Vd  1.479  10
5
1.75  10
4  N

2 2
CQC
 
5
Vd.CQC   Vd 1 n ρn m Vd 1 m Vd.CQC  1.491  10 N
 
n 1 m 1

Momen guling: h 1  4 h 2  4 H 8

 
Mg  h 1 H  FJ 
Mg  9.719  10
5
1.376  10
3  Nm
CQC
2 2

  Mg1 nρn mMg1 m  9.719  10

5
MgCQC  Nm
n 1 m 1

10.5 Detail Responses for each plane frame

 0.02217387 0.00147726  m
qL  qL  fD   
 0.04479237 0.00082201 
1
q t  KMM  KMN qL

 0.0001806277 0.0000098001 
 0.004501501 0.0000405212

 
 0.0001806277 0.0000098001 
 0.004501501 0.0000405212 
qt   
0.0000186301
 0.0002455968 
 0.0025766786 0.0003452805 
 0.0002455968 0.0000186301 
 
 0.0025766786 0.0003452805 

page : 12
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

Peralihan Lengkap

 0.0001806277 0.0000098001 
 
 0.004501501 0.0000405212

 0.0001806277 0.0000098001 
 0.004501501 0.0000405212 
 
0.0000186301 
q  stack q t qL   
0.0002455968
 0.0025766786 0.0003452805 
 0.0002455968 0.0000186301

 
 0.0025766786 0.0003452805 
 0.0221738656 0.0014772582 
 
 0.0447923732 0.0008220121 

10.5.1. Menentukan Matriks Peralihan Global tiap elemen dalam Koordinat Global

D( i)  for nd  1  ndin
for L  1  6
D  D( i)
K  MCODE i
L i
D q if K  0
L nd K nd
D  0 otherwise
L nd
D
L nd
D
D

10.5.2. Menentukan Matriks Peralihan tiap elemen dalam sumbu lokal

d  Λ  D
i i i

 2.456  10 4 1.863  10

 5
 
 0.045 8.22  10
 4
 
 2.577  10 3 3.453  10
 4
d  
5
 1.806  10 4 9.8  10
6

 3

 0.022 1.477  10 
 3  5
 4.502  10 4.052  10 

page : 13
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

10.5.3. Gaya Dalam elemen-i

a. Dalam sumbu lokal

 Ey Ai Ey  A
i 
 0 0  0 0 
 Li L
i 
 
12 Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 12 Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix
 i i i i 

 0 0
2 
Li  i Li Li 
3 2 3
 L
 
6  Ey  Ix 4  Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 2  Ey  Ix
 i i i i 

 0 0

Li Li
2 L 2 L
 i i 
k    f  k  d
 Ey Ai Ey  A
i i i i
i 
 L 0 0
L
0 0

 i i 
 12 Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 12 Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 
i i i i
 0   0  

 L Li Li Li 
3 2 3 2 
 i
 6  Ey  Ix 2  Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 4  Ey  Ix 
i i i i
 0 0  

Li Li 
2 L 2 L
i i
 

T
b. Dalam sumbu global FG  Λ  f
i i i

c. Hasil Response
c.1. Lokal

 0 0   0 0 
 5   4 3
 1.191  10 998.885   6.689  10 9.091  10 
 5 3  5 4 
 3.572  10 2.997  10  2.007  10 2.727  10 
f  f 
1  0 0  2  0 0 
 5
  4 3

 1.191  10 998.885   6.689  10 9.091  10 
 5 3  5 4 
 3.572  10 2.997  10   2.007  10 2.727  10 

page : 14
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 1.86  105 1.009  10

4   1.86  105 1.009  10
4
   
 1.356  105 1.604  10
4   1.356  105 1.604  10 
4
   
 2.094  105 3.264  10 
4  2.094  105 3.264  10 
4
f   f  
3 4
 1.86  105 1.009  10 
4
 1.86  105 1.009  10 
4
 5 4
  5 4

 1.356  10 1.604  10   1.356  10 1.604  10 
 5 4   5 4 
 3.33  10 3.153  10   3.33  10 3.153  10 

 6.689  104 9.091  10

3   6.689  104 9.091  10
3
   
 8.713  104 1.573  10
4  8.713  104 1.573  10
4
   
 2.007  105 2.727  10
4  2.007  105 2.727  10
4
f   f  
5 6
 6.689  104 9.091  10 
3
 6.689  104 9.091  10 3
 4 4
  4 4

 8.713  10 1.573  10   8.713  10 1.573  10 
 5 4  5 4
 1.478  10 3.564  10   1.478  10 3.564  10 

c.2. Global

 0 0   0 0 
 5   4 3 
 1.191  10 998.885   6.689  10 9.091  10 
 5 3  5 4 
 3.572  10 2.997  10   2.007  10 2.727  10 
FG  FG 
1  0 0  2  0 0 
 5
  4 3

 1.191  10 998.885   6.689  10 9.091  10 
 5 3  5 4 
 3.572  10 2.997  10   2.007  10 2.727  10 

 1.356  105 1.604  10 

4  1.356  105 1.604  10
4
   
 1.86  105 1.009  10 
4  1.86  105 1.009  10
4 
   
 2.094  105 3.264  10
4   2.094  105 3.264  10
4 
FG    FG   
3 4
 1.356  105 1.604  10 
4
 1.356  105 1.604  10 
4
 5 4
  5 4

 1.86  10 1.009  10   1.86  10 1.009  10 
 5 4   5 4 
 3.33  10 3.153  10   3.33  10 3.153  10 

page : 15
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 8.713  104 1.573  10

4  8.713  104 1.573  10
4
   
 6.689  104 9.091  10
3  6.689  104 9.091  10 
3
   
 2.007  105 2.727  10 
4  2.007  105 2.727  10 
4
FG    FG   
5 6
 8.713  104 1.573  10 
4
 8.713  104 1.573  10 
4
 4 3
  4 3

 6.689  10 9.091  10   6.689  10 9.091  10 
 5 4  5 4
 1.478  10 3.564  10   1.478  10 3.564  10 

d. Hasil CQC :

 2 2   2 2 
    f i  ρn m  f i       FGi  ρn m  FGi  
  1 n 1 m
   1 n 1 m

n 1 m 1 n 1 m 1
   
 2 2
  2 2

    f i  ρn m  f i       FGi  ρn m  FGi  
  2 n 2 m
   2 n 2 m

n 1 m 1 n 1 m 1
   
 2 2   2 2 
    f i  ρn m  f i       FGi  ρn m  FGi  
  3 n 3 m
   3 n 3 m

n 1 m 1 n 1 m 1
f    FG   
i i
 2 2   2 2 
    f i  ρn m  f i       FGi  ρn m  FGi  
  4 n 4 m    4 n 4 m 
n 1 m 1 n 1 m 1
   
 2 2   2 2 
    f i  ρn m  f i       FGi  ρn m  FGi  
  5 n 5 m    5 n 5 m 
n 1 m 1 n 1 m 1
   
 2 2   2 2 
    f i  ρn m  f i       FGi  ρn m  FGi  
  6 n 6 m    6 n 6 m 
n 1 m 1  n 1 m 1 

 1.862  5  1.862  5
 0   0  
10
 
10

 5  4  1.366  5  1.366  5
 1.191  10   6.745  10  10 10
   
 5  5
3.572  2.024   2.121  10 
5  2.121  5
f 
10 
f 
10  10
f   f  
1   2   3 4
0 0
 1.862  10 
5
 1.862  5
    10
5 4    
 1.191  10   6.745  10  5 5
 1.366  10   1.366  10 
 5  5
 3.572  10   2.024  10   5  5
 3.347  10   3.347  10 

page : 16
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 6.745  10
4  6.745  10
4
   
 8.844  10
4  8.844  10
4
   
 2.024  10
5  2.024  10
5
f   f  
5 6
 6.745  10 
4
 6.745  10 4
 4
  4

 8.844  10   8.844  10 
 5  5
 1.519  10   1.519  10 

 1.366  10
5  1.366  10
5
 0   0     
 5  4  1.862  10
5  1.862  10
5
 1.191  10   6.745  10     
 5  5  2.121  10
5  2.121  10
5
3.572   2.024 
FG  
10  10  FG    FG   
FG  3 4
1  0  2  0   1.366  10 
5
 1.366  10
5

 5
  4
  5
  5

 1.191  10   6.745  10   1.862  10   1.862  10 
 5  5  5  5
 3.572  10   2.024  10   3.347  10   3.347  10 

 8.844  10
4  8.844  10
4
   
 6.745  10
4  6.745  10
4
   
 2.024  10
5  2.024  10
5
FG    FG   
5 6
 8.844  10 
4
 8.844  10
4

 4
  4

 6.745  10   6.745  10 
 5  5
 1.519  10   1.519  10 

Notes:
Semua hasil CQC dalam analisis dinamik harus positif

page : 17
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

11. Analisis Statik Ekuivalen

11.1. Menentukan Bebal Lateral Statik di setiap lantai

z  h 1  4 z  h 1  h 2  8 Vs  149068.49917 N
1 2

The vertical Distribution of Shear m  m1 m  m2

1 2
Σmjzj  m1  z  m2  z  859181.212
1 2

11.2. Gaya Lateral Statik n story  2

Distribusi vertikal
menurut SNI 1726-201X
T1  0.591

k  1 if T  0.5
2 if T  2.5
0.5 T  0.75 otherwise
k1

j  1  n story

 j
k
m z  5.364  104 
  F  
j
F   Vs
j nstory  4
 9.543  10 
m  z k
  j  j 
j1

11.3. Peralihan Lateral, peralihan, simpangan antara tingkat dan gaya dalam

11.2.1. Peralihan Lateral dan Simpangan antara tingkat

1  0.00608998 
q L  KL F    Δ  q L  0.00609
 0.01228959  1 1

Δ   q L  q L   0.0062
2  2 1

a. Kontrol kondisi beban kerja :

page : 18
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 0.00609 
Δ   m
 0.0061996 

Cd  5.5
b. Kontrol kondisi beban ultimate :

Cd  0.022   0.02 h 1   0.08 

Δ     0.02 h 2   0.08 
Δult  m ΔbatasULT   m,oke juga
Ie  0.023 

 0.00004954 
 
 0.00004954   0.00123521 
 0.00123521   0.00004954 
   0.00123521 
 0.00004954   
 0.00123521 
1
q t  KMM  KMN q L   q  stack q t q L   0.00006734 
  0.00070598 
 0.00006734   0.00006734 
 0.00070598   
 0.00006734   0.00070598 
   0.00608998 
 0.00070598 
 
 0.01228959 
D( i)  for L  1  6
K  MCODE
L i
D q if K  0
L 1 K 1
D  0 otherwise
L 1
D
L 1
D
D  D( i) d  Λ  D
i i i i

page : 19
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 Ey Ai Ey  A
i 
 0 0  0 0 
 Li L
i 
 
12 Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 12 Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix
 i i i i 

 0 0
2 
Li Li Li Li 
3 2 3

 
6  Ey  Ix 4  Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 2  Ey  Ix
 i i i i 

 0 0

Li Li
2 L 2 L
 i i 
k   
 Ey Ai Ey  A
i
i 
 L 0 0
L
0 0

 i i 
 12 Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 12 Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 
i i i i
 0   0  

Li Li Li Li 
3 2 3 2 

 6  Ey  Ix 2  Ey  Ix 6  Ey  Ix 4  Ey  Ix 
i i i i
 0 0  

Li Li 
2 L 2 L
i i
 

11.2.2. Gaya Dalam fs  k  d

i i i
 5.1  104   5.1  104 
 0   0     
 4  4  3.727  104   3.727  104 
 3.268  10   1.833  10     
 4  4
9.803  10   5.758  104   5.758  104 
  5.498  10  fs 
fs 
1 
fs    fs   
 2   3 4
0 0
 5.1  104   5.1  104 
   
4 4    
 3.268  10   1.833  10  4 4
 3.727  10   3.727  10 
 4  4
 9.803  10   5.498  10   4   4 
 9.149  10   9.149  10 

 1.833  104 
   1.833  104 
 
 2.386  104   2.386  104 
   
 5.498  104 
fs    5.498  104 
 fs  
5 
 1.833  104  6
 1.833  104 
 
4  
 2.386  10  4
 2.386  10 
 4 
 4.045  10   4 
 4.045  10 

page : 20
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 0   0 
 4  4
 3.268  10   3.268  10 
 4  4
 9.803  10  T  9.803  10 
FGS  K( 1 )  D  FGS  Λ  fs 
1 1  0  1 1 1  0 
 4
  4

 3.268  10   3.268  10 
 4  4
 9.803  10   9.803  10 

page : 21
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 3.125  10
 3
 
0 8  0.15   3.125   3
6 8  0.15  10
 
     3
 2.133 
N 
0 4  0.16  10
A Ix   
6 4  0.16  3
 2.133  
0   0.16  10
0  
    3
6 0  0.16   2.133  10 
  3
 2.133  10 

page : 22
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

pake ;

L 6 L 4
1 5

5 3
α  3.724  10 β  1.728  10
1 1
5 3
α  8.58  10 β  1.2  10
5 5

c 1 s 0 c 0 s  1
1 1 5 5

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
   
Λ 
0
Λ 
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 
0 0 0 0 1 0
 0 0 0 1 0
 0
   
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

page : 23
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 6.435  108 0 0 6.435  10

8
0 0 
 
 0 4.469  10
6
1.341  10
7
0
6
4.469  10 1.341  10
7 
 
 0 1.341  10
7
5.362  10
7
0
7
1.341  10 2.681  10
7 
K( 1 )   
 6.435  108 0 0 6.435  10
8
0 0 
 6 7 6 7

 0 4.469  10 1.341  10 0 4.469  10 1.341  10 
 7 7 7 7 
 0 1.341  10 2.681  10 0 1.341  10 5.362  10 

 1.03  107 0 2.059  10

7
1.03  10
7
0  2.059  10
7
 
 0 1.03  10
9
0 0 1.03  10
9
0 
 
 2.059  107 0
7
5.491  10 2.059  10
7
0 2.746  10
7 
K( 5 )   
 1.03  107 0 2.059  10
7
1.03  10
7
0 2.059  10 
7
 9 9

 0 1.03  10 0 0 1.03  10 0 
 7 7 7 7 
 2.059  10 0 2.746  10 2.059  10 0 5.491  10 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 
SS  
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

page : 24
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 2.064  109 1.341  10

7
4.469  10
6
1.341  10
7
1.03  10
9
 0
 7 8 7 7 7
 1.341  10 1.634  10 1.341  10 2.681  10 0 2.746  10
 4.469  106 1.341  10
7
2.064  10
9
1.341  10
7
0 0 1

 1.341  107 2.681  10
7
1.341  10
7
1.634  10
8
0 0

 1.03  109 0 0 0 1.034  10
9
1.341  10
7
4
SS  
 0 2.746  10
7
0 0 1.341  10
7
1.085  10
8
1
 9 6 7
 0 0 1.03  10 0 4.469  10 1.341  10 1.
 7 7 7
 0 0 0 2.746  10 1.341  10 2.681  10 1
 7
 0 0 0 0 0 2.059  10
 7 7 7
 0 2.059  10 0 2.059  10 0 2.059  10

page : 25
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 4.118  107 2.059  107 

KNN   
 7 7 
 2.059  10 2.059  10 

Ini milik satu portal

Ada dua portal identik

page : 26
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 8.769  104 7.276  10 12 

a  M a   
T
  12 4 
 7.276  10 9.857  10 

1T 2T
a  M I a  M I
Γ  Γ  1.22 Γ  Γ  0.396
1 1 2 2
1T 1 2T 2
a  M a a  M a

 1.22 
Γ  
 0.396 

page : 27
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

Ln1 1
2

α1  α1  0.894
wt

2
 1T 
α 
 a  M I α  0.894
1 1
 1T 1 
2
 a  M a    M
k k
k1

page : 28
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 0.045 8.22  10
 4
 
 2.456  10 4 1.863  10
 5
 
 2.577  10 3 3.453  10
 4
D  
6 3
 0.022 1.477  10 
 4 6

 1.806  10 9.8  10 
 3  5
 4.502  10 4.052  10 

page : 29
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 0 0 
 5 
 1.191  10 998.885 
 5 3
 3.572  10 2.997  10 
f 
1  0 0 
 5

 1.191  10 998.885 
 5 3
 3.572  10 2.997  10 

page : 30
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

 6.09  10 3 
qL   
 0.012 

page : 31
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

page : 32
2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd

hasil CQC dinamik

 1.862  5  1.862  5
 0   0  
10
 
10

 5  4  1.366  5  1.366  5
 1.191  10   6.745  10  10 10
   
 5  5
3.572  2.024   2.121  5  2.121  5
f 
10 
f 
10  10 10
f   f  
1   2   3 4
0 0
 1.862  10 
5
 1.862  5

    10
5 4    
 1.191  10   6.745  10  5 5
 1.366  10   1.366  10 
 5  5
 3.572  10   2.024  10   5  5
 3.347  10   3.347  10 

 6.745  10
4
 6.745  4
  10
 
 8.844  4
10  8.844  4
  10
 
 2.024  10 
5
f   2.024  5
 f 
10
5 
 6.745  10 
4 6
 6.745  4

  10
4  
 8.844  10  4
 8.844  10 
 5
 1.519  10   5
 1.519  10 

page : 33
 2019 Dynamic&Static Analysis of prepared by Djoni Simanta
Two Stories Plane Frames
Model.xmcd


0 0 0 0 
7 
2.059  10
0 0 0

1.03  10
9
0 0 0


7 7 
0 2.746  10 0 2.059  10

6
4.469  10 1.341  10
7
0 0 

.341  10 2.681  10 2.059  10 2.059  10 
7 7 7 7

9 7

034  10 1.341  10 0 0 
7 8 7 7 
.341  10 1.085  10 2.059  10 2.059  10 
7 7 7
0 2.059  10 4.118  10 2.059  10 
7 7 7 
0 2.059  10 2.059  10 2.059  10 

page : 34