Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NWSS - Supply Demand Forecast
NWSS - Supply Demand Forecast
November 2010
0
Objectives of the Meeting
1
Stage of Development of the National Water Sector Strategy – 4 Nov. 2010
Today
Focus of Current
Today’s Stage of
Meeting Progress
B
Develop Capital
Project
A Masterplan D E
Develop High-
Establish Baseline,
Assess Overall Level
Identify Priority
Financial Roadmap and
Gaps and Set C Requirements Implementation
Sector Objectives
Plan
Develop Enabling
Initiatives
4 -5 months
Management and First Steering Second Steering Final Steering Committee
Stakeholder Interviews Committee Presentation Committee Presentation Presentation
2
Schematic of the water demand/supply forecasting model
DEMAND SUPPLY
Domestic Water Demand Main Demand Drivers Main Supply Policy Levers Potable Water Supply
Consumption per Capita Consumption patterns (for Optimization of available
x Population taking into WS, industry, irrigation and surface water resources Surface Water
account UfW tourism)
Changes in groundwater
Industrial Water Demand Population growth Groundwater
policies/production coupled
Impact of economic with artificial recharge of
Share of Domestic development on water aquifers Storage
consumption
Existing/potential surface
Irrigation Water Demand Changes in tariff structures storage Non-Potable Water Supply
Irrigated Area x Irrigation Effect of water conservation
Consumption taking into Reuse of treated wastewater
Decrease in UfW
account Efficiency Treated wastewater
Irrigation efficiency Agreements on shared water
used only for
Tourism Water Demand improvement resources
agriculture and
Numbers of Tourists industry
x Periods of Stay
x Touristic Consumption
3
Forecasting methodology for drivers and policy levers on water demand
(1/2)
Assumptions will need to be
validated/ revisited in due course
during the planning phases
Drivers/Policy Levers
Assumes demand per capita thresholds associated with urban development level, based on
Domestic Consumption international benchmarks adapted to local conditions
1.a
per Capita Domestic water includes water consumption for residential, commercial and governmental entities
In the absence of recent surveys on the water consumption of the industrial sector, assumes
1.b Industrial Consumption
industrial demand as a share of domestic demand
Uses the latest figures of the Ministry of Tourism and the General Security, as well as international
1.c Tourism Consumption benchmarks to determine touristic water consumption
Relies on Mediterranean basin benchmarks to determine daily consumption per tourist
Uses the latest figures of the Ministry of Agriculture, based on the latest census done by FAO, and
World Bank studies
1.d Irrigation Consumption
Irrigation consumption is to be reduced, by improving irrigation efficiency of existing and planned
irrigation schemes, as well as optimizing on-farm irrigation techniques
Uses population figures and historical growth rates forecasts by Central Administration of Statistics
2 Population Growth to estimate projected population growth
Uses numbers of Palestinian refugees based on UNRWA data
4
Forecasting methodology for drivers and policy levers on water demand
(2/2)
Assumptions will need to be
validated/ revisited in due course
during the planning phases
Drivers/Policy Levers
Uses government plans for the development of the irrigation sector and achieve an integrated and
3 sustainable rural development
Irrigation Growth
Irrigated areas are to be increased in line with government policies. From the current 90,000 ha of
irrigated lands, targets of reaching 120,000 ha by 2020 and 150,000 ha by 2035 have been set
Uses historical and forecasted real GDP growth to assess the impact of economic development on
4 Impact of Economic projected demand for water , leading to an increase of 1% per annum
Development
5 Tariff Change Uses elasticity of demand to estimate the impact of water tariff changes on water consumption
Assumes a decrease in water consumption through anticipated water conservation initiatives and
6 Water Conservation assumes its impact on domestic and non-domestic consumers. Awareness and conservation
campaigns are planned through MEW’s Lebanese Center for Water Management and Conservation
rates vary among the WEs from 40% to 52%. A weighted average of 48% has been adopted on
country level. Targets of reducing UfW to 30% by 2020 and to 20% by 2035 have been adopted
7 Reduction in UfW
Assumes a decrease in UfW following initiatives carried out by WEs under MEW’s oversight and
determines its impact on distributed water
5
Thresholds are based on
1 Water demand international benchmarks
1.a adapted to local conditions 1.b 1.c 1.d
Domestic
Industrial Tourism Irrigation
Rural Areas Urban Areas
Drinking and cooking Drinking and cooking Mainly small scale Consumption based Including losses in
Personal use (bath, industries: 99% of on benchmarks of transmission and
Personal use (bath,
washing, etc)
washing, etc) industries have less similar countries in distribution
Laundry, dishwashing
Laundry, dishwashing (machine) than 50 employees the region networks
Cleaning Cleaning Average of 6.5 Average 63,400 ha (70.4% )
Large scale gardening m3/day per small consumption in furrow irrigation
Gardening Public Gardens
Commercial use (5-10 %
establishment Mediterranean 21,100 (23.4%)
Limited commercial use
(~3% of demand) of demand) Can reach up to 600 countries: 440 sprinkler irrigation
m3/day for larges l/tourist/day
MENA Average: 198 lcd
5,500 (6.2%) drip
MENA Average w/o UAE: 176 lcd
establishment s irrigation
11% of water use
goes to industry
Agriculture Demand
Rural Domestic Demand Urban Domestic Demand Industrial Demand Tourism Demand
9000 m3/ha/yr
160 lcd 180 lcd 30% of Domestic Demand 400 l/tourist/d
In 2010
Source: MoA, FAO Aquastat, UNESCO, WB, ESCWA, MEW (1996 , 1999),
6
2 Population and growth
South
North
BML
Share of
Total 46% 21% 21% 13% 100%
Population
7
3 Irrigated areas and growth
Irrigated Areas in WEs , 2010 (ha) Projected Growth in Irrigated Areas in Lebanon, 2010 - 2035
(ha)
90,000
45,000
24,000
9,000 12,000
8
4 Urban water consumption and relation with GDP
900
800 Lifestyle
Canada
Consumption per Capita (l/capita/day)
700 Inefficient
distribution
600 United States
UAE
Armenia
500 Venezuela Australia
9
5 Impact of Tariff Change
Current and Proposed Tariff Systems Benchmarks on Applied Tariffs in MENA region
$ Level of Level of
Pure
Country City Structure Block Tariff Water Tariff WW Tariff
Pureflat rate
flat rate
(Current) V, F, M I, D, C USD/m3 USD/m3
Adana V C 1.38 0.34
Usage
Usage
Ankara V C 1.31 n/a
Turkey Izmir V I 1.45 1.02
Istambul V I 1.96 1.29
Konya V C 0.98 n/a
$
p $
p
Syria Damascus V I 0.05 0.02
Lebanon BMLWE F n/a 0.43 0
Volumetric Morocco Casablanca V I 0.72 0.05
Pricing Oman Muscat n/a n/a 0 n/a
Usage Usage
Usage
Occupied Territories V I 1.23 0.32
Fixed charge +
Pay per use Palestine Ramallah V I 1.23 0.32
pay per use
Bahrain Manama V I 0.07 n/a
p
$ Qatar Doha V C 1.21 n/a
p
$
Jeddah V C 0.05 0
KSA
Riyad V I 0.03 0
Block Tariff UAE Dubai V I 2.16 n/a
Pricing
Usage
Usage V = volumetric I = increasing
Progressive/ Increasing/ F = fixed fee D = decreasing
degressive pay per use decreasing block tariff M = Mix C = constant
Source: IB-Net
10
5 Impact of Tariff Change
Clients able
Tariffs shall Tariffs shall Predictability
to choose Highlights
be affordable cover costs for revenues
consumption
Tariff structures will see significant
Pure flat tariff modifications:
‒ For water supply: the current flat
Pure volumetric tariff tariff structure will be replaced by
a volumetric tariff structure after
Progressive
volumetric tariff replacement of gauges by meters
‒ For irrigation: the different forms
Fixed charge plus
volumetric tarif of tariffs currently applied will be
replaced by volumetric tariffs
Fixed charge plus
progressive
volumetric tariff
‒ For wastewater: A new tariff will
be introduced in proportion with
the used volumes of water supply
Current Model
Total Household Bill ($/year)
11
6 Water conservation
Household and establishment audits Farm audits and optimization according to local
conditions
12
7 Decrease in UFW levels
25% 25 %
25 % Moderate
experience in MENA countries show
20% 20 %
Scenario that a level of 20% is feasible
15%
15 % Conservative
10% We assumed that significant leakage
Demand
5% improvement projects will be carried
0% out by WEs under MEW’s oversight
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 over the 2011–2020 period
Source: WEs, MEW analysis
13
To allow for more flexibility , three
scenarios have been considered on
Three scenarios for demand drivers (1/2) the demand side: High Demand,
Moderate Demand, Conservative
Demand
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Drivers/Policy Levers
Conservative Demand Moderate Demand High Demand
1.a Domestic Consumption 160 lcd - Urban 180 lcd - Urban 200 lcd - Urban
per Capita 140 lcd - Rural 160 lcd - Rural 180 lcd - Rural
14
To allow for more flexibility , three
scenarios have been considered on
Three scenarios for demand drivers (2/2) the demand side: High Demand,
Moderate Demand, Conservative
Demand
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Drivers/Policy Levers
Conservative Demand Moderate Demand High Demand
Saving per year from Saving per year from Saving per year from
6 Water Conservation 2011 to 2020 2011 to 2020 2011 to 2020
3.5 lcd 3.0 lcd 2.5 lcd
15
Total demand under the moderate demand scenario
Moderate Scenario for Water Demand per Region Moderate Scenario for Water Demand per Usage
(in MCM/yr, 2010 - 2035) (in MCM/yr, 2010 - 2035)
North Industrial
169
152 154
138 128 140
16
The range between the conservative and high demand scenarios
High Demand
2,518
Water Demand (MCM/yr)
Comments
+39%
The range observed between the low and
high demand scenarios is the result of
1,802 different assumptions on the drivers in each
of the scenarios
-22% The main drivers are consumption per capita
thresholds, population growth, impact of
1,410 GDP growth, industrial and irrigation
Low Demand consumption and growth, etc.:
– Consumption per capita thresholds
0 vary between 140 lcd and 200 lcd
– Annual average population growth
ranges between 1.5% and 2.0% for the
Demand Scenarios – Domestic Consumption per Capita (lcd) – Urban Area low and high scenarios respectively
Low (sc. 1) 160 153 145 153 161 169 – Industrial consumption varies between
Mod (sc. 2) 180 174 167 176 185 195 25% and 35 %
High (sc. 3) 200 195 190 199 209 220 – Targets for irrigation areas in 2035 vary
between 13,000 and 180,000 ha and
consumption between 7000 m3/ha to
Demand Scenarios – Irrigation Consumption per Hectare (m3/ha/yr) 8000 m3/ha
Low (sc. 1) 9,000 8,600 8,200 7,800 7,400 7,000 – Targets for UfW in 2035 vary between
Mod (sc. 2) 9,000 8,600 8,200 7,800 7,400 7,000 15% and 25% for the low and high
High (sc. 3) 9,000 8,800 8,600 8,400 8,200 8,000 scenarios respectively
17
Sources of water in Lebanon and usage
More than 2,000 springs exist all over Lebanon with varying flows around the year
Total yield exceeds 1200 MCM in an average year, with less than 200 MCM available during the dry summer months
Surface Water
Existing surface water resources (springs) are being currently exploited to a large extent by WEs. Limited optimization
could be achieved by around 1% per year for the coming 10 years
Around 650 governmental wells supply WEs throughout the country with potable water. Total volume used in 2009:
more than 270 MCM
More than 43,000 private wells are used for potable water and agriculture. Total volume used in 2009 is feared to be
higher than 440 MCM. Unlike other sources, private wells serve only a portion of the population
Groundwater
Although strict policies for groundwater extractions have been initiated, no major reductions in extractions are planned
before 2015, planned date for the coming on board of sustainable alternatives. Between 2015 and 2024, private
groundwater extractions are to be reduced gradually at a rate of 6%per year with increasing reliance on public wells.
Ultimately, withdrawals from aquifers should not exceed natural replenishment rate, i.e. 500 MCM/yr
Surface storage is mainly concentrated in 2 dams with a total capacity of 235 MCM:
• Qaraoun Dam: 220 MCM static and 160 MCM (up to 180 MCM) dynamic
Surface Storage
• Chabrouh Dam: 8 MCM static and up to 15 MCM dynamic
Currently, only 45 MCM are used for WS and irrigation, the rest for hydropower
The average rate of wastewater treatment reached 4% in 2009 – Virtually no reuse is being currently practiced
Non
Conventional Limited desalination is done by private sector (4.5MCM) and EDL (5.5 MCM)
Water Additional flows are expected from non conventional sources, but have not been modeled for lack of clarity on available
data
Source: MEW, WEs, Ministry of Agriculture
18
Scenarios for water resource policy
19
Surface and groundwater supply – Average year
Split between Surface Water, Groundwater and Surface Storage
(in MCM/yr, 2010-2035) Key Highlights
20
Supply / Demand Outputs – main considerations and assumptions
Surface water: 100% of available exploitable Available surface water: 70% of average year
throughout the year after optimization Available groundwater: 100% of average year
Groundwater: 90 % of annual renewable Used storage: 100% of full capacity (45 MCM in
Full year
capacity 2010)
Used storage: 100% of full capacity (45 MCM in
2010)
Total demand: ~60% of full year demand Available surface water: 25% of full dry year
(irrigation demand ~70% of full year demand) Extracted private groundwater: 70% of full dry
Summer Months Available surface water: 25% of full year year
(July – October) Extracted private groundwater: 70% of full year Extracted public groundwater: 60% of full dry
Extracted public groundwater: 60% of full year year
Used storage: 65% of full capacity Used storage: 65% of full capacity
21
Currently the actual amount of water
Lebanon – Average Year consumed is different form the demand
due to availability and supply constraints
Shortage
Total Demand
Shortage
Water Capacities (MCM/yr)
22
WEs – Average Year
BML North
Water Capacities (MCM/yr)
Shortage
Total Demand Shortage
Total Demand
Private Groundwater
Existing Storage Capacity Private Groundwater
Shortage
South Total Demand Bekaa
Water Capacities (MCM/yr)
Total Demand
Private Groundwater
Private Groundwater
Existing Storage Capacity
23
Annual Supply vs. Demand Curves in Lebanon
Supply
Demand
Excess Deficit
Drought Period
24
Lebanon – Average Year – Summer Months (Jul. – Oct.)
Currently the actual amount of water
consumed is different form the demand
due to availability and supply constraints
Shortage
Water Capacities (MCM/yr)
25
WEs – Average Year – Summer Months (Jul. – Oct.)
BML North
Water Capacities (MCM)
Shortage
Total Demand
Shortage
Total Demand
Private Groundwater
Private Groundwater
Existing Storage Capacity
Surface Water Supply Surface Water Supply
Public Groundwater Supply Public Groundwater Supply
Total Demand
Shortage
Private Groundwater
Private Groundwater
Existing Storage Capacity
Existing Storage Capacity
Surface Water Supply Surface Water Supply
Public Groundwater Supply Public Groundwater Supply
26
Lebanon – Dry Year (with projected storage)
Currently the actual amount of water
consumed is different form the demand
due to availability and supply constraints
Contingency/
Total Demand Strategic Reserve
Shortage
700 MCM
Projected Underground/Surface Storage
Water Capacities (MCM/yr)
27
WEs – Dry Year (with projected storage)
BML North
Water Capacities (MCM/yr)
Total Demand
Shortage Total Demand
Shortage
28
Optimization of surface water resources
Unit Cost of Optimization of Surface Water Resources – Previous Experience
(in USD/m3)
Highlights
Existing surface water resources
(springs) are being currently exploited
Average: 1.54 USD/m3 3.26 2.95 to a large extent by WEs
1.55
0.94 Limited optimization could be
0.16 0.34
achieved by around 1% per year for
Touffaha Moghr Qsem Ouyoun Ain Ed Delbe Daichounie the period 2011 -2020
Samak
Previous experience at MEW proved
the efficiency of superficial
improvement of the catchment of
Cost of Optimization of Surface Water Resources surface water springs
(in MUSD, 2011-2020)
An increase of 10-15% of the initial
flow during the low season was
achieved
29
Potential artificial groundwater recharge
Potential for Artificial Groundwater Recharge
Artificial Groundwater Recharge - Rationale
(MCM/yr)
Groundwater aquifers in Lebanon are highly exploited,
mainly in Beirut, Tripoli, South Lebanon and the Bekaa.
Around 500 MCM/yr are being naturally replenished.
Current extractions amount to around 700 MCM/yr
leading to a deficit of around 200 MCM/yr. As a result,
the water table is depleting with saline water intrusion
in coastal areas
Karstic aquifers are well spread all over Lebanon and
contain considerable volumes of water
Groundwater is a localized resource with no surface
CAPEX Forecast for Artificial Groundwater Recharge evaporation and does not involve large transmission
(MUSD, 2011-2035) systems
Artificial recharge is technically feasible in a large
portion of the country
Pilot projects can be started near Beirut, Tripoli and
Baalbek. The situation in South Lebanon requires
deeper consideration
Preliminary studies show that each well could have a
potential flow of 50-100 l/s during a period of at least 3
months
30
Surface storage potential
Noura El Tahta
Potential for Surface Storage (MCM)
Kouachra
Qarkaf Atolbe
Kamoua
Bared
Brissa
Chabrouh
Boqaata
Manzoul
Massa
Kaysamani Barhacha
Aazounieh
Damour
Maaser Chouf
Bisri
Ain Aarab
Lebaa Kfarhouna
Dam Opex Forecast for Surface Storage (MUSD/yr)
Azibeh Hill Lake
Jarjou
Salaa
Jinsnaya
Ibl Es Saki
Kfarsir
Khardali
Chohour
31
Surface storage potential per WE
Designation Capacity (MCM) CAPEX OPEX Designation Capacity (MCM) CAPEX OPEX
of Dam Total WS Irrig. (MUSD) (MUSD/yr) of Dam Total WS Irrig. (MUSD) (MUSD/yr)
Boqaata 9.0 9.0 0.0 69.0 2.3 Kfarhouna 1.2 0.0 1.2 17.0 0.1
El Manzoul 0.5 0.5 0.0 15.0 0.2 Lebaa 0.8 0.0 0.8 15.0 0.1
Bisri 120.0 120.0 0.0 265.0 26.4 Azibeh 0.6 0.0 0.6 13.0 0.1
Kaysamani 1.0 1.0 0.0 25.0 0.3 Jarjou 1.0 1.0 0.0 19.0 0.3
Aazounieh 4.5 4.5 0.0 65.0 1.1
Chohour 1.0 1.0 0.0 22.0 0.3
Maaser Chouf 2.1 2.1 0.0 53.0 0.5
Damour 39.0 32.5 6.5 150.0 7.3 Jinsnaya 0.8 0.8 0.0 15.0 0.2
El Janneh 60.0 60.0 0.0 300.0 13.2 Ibl Es Saki 45 15.0 30.0 200.0 3.9
Moukhada 4.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 0.6 Khardali 117.5 20.0 97.5 280.0 6.4
Ratiba 0.6 0.3 0.3 9.0 0.1 Kfarsir 15 5.0 10.0 45.0 1.8
Total BML 240.7 231.9 8.8 960.0 52.0 Total South 182.9 42.8 140.1 626.0 13.1
Total North 190.0 77.0 113.0 682.0 25.0 Total Bekaa 99.8 14.8 84.5 386.0 6.0
32
Infrastructure forecasting – Water supply transmission & distribution
Transmission(1) CAPEX (in MUSD) Distribution(2) CAPEX (in MUSD) Trans. & Distr. OPEX (in MUSD/yr)
Highlights
CAPEX in first five years are relatively high because of efforts to replace existing over-age assets. More than 50% of existing transmission
and distribution assets have reached the end of their useful life
Storage targets to achieve 0,5 and 1 day retention time for BML and other WE's respectively
Metering targets until 2015 in BML 95%, in North/South 85% and Bekaa 75%. Total meter installation over 750,000
33
Infrastructure forecasting – Irrigation
1 Commissioning
CAPEX OPEX
Designation Area (ha) Before After
(MUSD) (MUSD/yr)
2020 2020
2 Noura Et Tahta
3 1 Scheme 5,000 58 1.2
3
3
3 2 El Bared Scheme 750 6 0.2
Source: MEW
34
Infrastructure forecasting – Wastewater
Coastal Systems Inland Systems Comments
Out of a total of
898 MSD funded,
200 MUSD have
already been
CAPEX spent and 698
(in MUSD) MUSD are
committed
Networks for
coastal
treatment plants
and inland plants
are already
OPEX funded by CDR
(in MUSD)
Assumptions
Schemes that are currently partly funded will be funded and completed and will become operational by 2015
Schemes that are currently unfunded will be implemented between 2013—2020
It is estimated that remaining areas not covered by the identified schemes would require around 500 million US$ and will be
implemented between 2013-2020
35
Next Steps …
36
Next and Final Steps
37