Professional Documents
Culture Documents
W
San Diego
by
2018
PR
Approved by
W
IE
EV
ProQuest 10794038
Published by ProQuest LLC (2018 ). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.
All rights reserved.
PR
This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG ii
W
IE
EV
PR
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG iii
DEDICATION
me to continue throughout my doctoral courses. Without his love, unconditional support, and
understanding, I could not have even dreamt of doing the doctorate. My elder daughter,
Robin, always there for me. She proofread and edited my dissertation with love and care. My
W
IE
EV
PR
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr. Kenneth Kelch who encouraged me during doctoral courses and eventually supports my
dissertation. When I began to my doctoral course, I questioned him whether I could finish the
doctoral course. I could not forget the time he gave me confidence and encouragement.
Without his invaluable support and guidance, I could not accomplish the research.
Jinsuk Byun and Dr. James Perren who reviewed my dissertation and provided comments to
improve the quality of my research. Their advice throughout the research was indispensable. I
W
would like to express my appreciation to my professors, Dr. Marry Ellen Butler-Pascoe, Dr.
Shirley Baker, Dr. Mira Malupa Kim, Dr. Rick Ansoff, and Kim Lawgali.
IE
I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my family: my husband, and two
EV
supported and encouraged me not only to do my best but also enjoy the learning. My elder
daughter, Robin Park, helped me greatly through her skill as an interpreter and a translator by
PR
editing my dissertation. I would never have accomplished this goal without her. My younger
one, Jaqueline Park, always supported me with love and gave me the energy to continue my
dissertation. My family’s love and encouragement have been a driving force for the
Finally, I would like to thank two professors. Special thanks go to my friend, Dr. Sang
Hun Jung who administered all the process of conducting a survey in Korea for my
dissertation. In addition, Dr. Bum Jong Kim who analyzed my data and patiently provided
comments and suggestions by answering my numerous questions about statistics. Thank you
enjoyed the learning process and had a lot of support from my family, professions, and
colleagues. I was fortunate to have such a precious experience and valuable memory. Now, I
W
IE
EV
PR
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG vi
Abstract
Smartphones have penetrated deeply into all aspects of our lives. Now, smartphones are our
life partners that enable us to message via applications (apps), communicate on social media,
share images and videos on Instagram or Snapchat, find easiest and fastest route through
GPS, take or edit photos and videos, check email, take notes, read books, and play mobile
games (Godwin-Jones, 2017). The impact of smartphones has also reached education and led
fundamental tool for mobile assisted language learning (MALL). However, before merging
this new technology with language education, it is critical to identify students’ perception
W
towards smartphone apps for English language learning (SAELL) and determinants affecting
experiences in using SAELL and to investigate factors affecting the students’ intention to use
SAELL, gender and academic major differences in acceptance of SAELL, as well as barriers
to using SAELL. A quantitative method was used to analyze data collected from 675
PR
participants in Korea. The result indicated that smartphones have already become a necessity
for Korean college students and the majority of them (82.5 %) had previous experience using
and self-management of learning were all significant factors that affect students’ intention to
use SAELL. Gender and academic major differences in acceptance of SAELL were also
psycho-social, and technical issues. Finally, this study discusses implications, limitations, and
proposed areas for future study. This study adds to the knowledge of how to use smartphones
for language learning and provides useful insights on the acceptance of SAELL.
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG vii
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. iv
Abstract .................................................................................................................................. vi
W
Purpose of the Study ........................................................................................................... 5
Scope of the Study .............................................................................................................. 6
IE
Research Questions ............................................................................................................. 6
Research Design .................................................................................................................. 6
Participants .......................................................................................................................... 7
EV
Instruments ......................................................................................................................... 7
Data Collection Procedures ................................................................................................. 8
Data Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8
PR
Portability........................................................................................................... 22
Ubiquity ............................................................................................................. 22
Flexibility ........................................................................................................... 22
Collaboration...................................................................................................... 23
Authentic and Situated Learning ....................................................................... 23
Personalized Learning ........................................................................................ 24
Disadvantage of M-learning ...................................................................................... 24
Physical Issues .................................................................................................. 24
Pedagogical Issues ............................................................................................ 25
Psycho-Social Issues .......................................................................................... 26
The Emergence of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) ................................... 27
The Concept of MALL............................................................................................... 27
W
The Impact of MALL on Language Skills ................................................................ 29
Learning Vocabulary ......................................................................................... 29
IE
Listening and Speaking ...................................................................................... 32
Learning Grammar ............................................................................................. 33
EV
The Use of Smartphone Apps for English Language Learning (SAELL) in Korea ......... 60
Smartphone and English Fever in Korea ................................................................... 61
Smart Learning and Smart Campus in Korea ............................................................ 62
Using Smartphone Apps for English Language Learning (SAELL) in Korea .................. 64
Korean Learners’ Usage of and Perception towards SAELL .................................... 64
The Popularity of Kakao Talk, a Korean Mobile Messenger App, in English Language
Learning ..................................................................................................................... 66
Using SNS for English Language Learning............................................................... 67
Using Functional Apps of Smartphone for English Language Learning ................... 68
Using English Proficiency Test Preparation Apps..................................................... 69
Analyzing Smartphone Apps for English Language Learning (SAELL) .................. 70
Summary ........................................................................................................................... 71
W
Chapter III. Methodology ................................................................................................... 73
Research Questions ........................................................................................................... 73
IE
Research Design ................................................................................................................ 74
Research Model ................................................................................................................ 75
EV
Participants ........................................................................................................................ 78
Instruments ........................................................................................................................ 80
Reliability and Validity ..................................................................................................... 82
PR
W
Barriers to Using Smartphone Apps for English Language Learning (SAELL) ............ 110
Summary ......................................................................................................................... 112
IE
Chapter V. Discussion and Conclusion ............................................................................ 113
Answers to the Research Questions ................................................................................ 113
EV
W
APPENDIX F. Regressions Analysis of English-Related Major Group ....................... 180
APPENDIX I. Moderating Effects of Academic Major by General Linear Model .... 184
PR
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG xii
List of Tables
Table 5. Experience, Number and Cost of Apps for English Learning ................................. 90
Table 7. Duration and Location of Using Apps for English Learning .................................. 92
W
Table 9. Correlations Matrix between Constructs ................................................................. 95
Table 23. Barriers to Using Smartphone Apps for English Language Learning ................. 111
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG xiii
List of Figures
Figure 1. Three Concepts of Mobile Learning (El-Hussein & Cronje, 2010, p. 17) ............. 21
W
IE
EV
PR
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG 1
CHAPTER I
Introduction
The widespread adoption of mobile technology in recent years has brought about a
tremendous increase in the number of people carrying mobile devices worldwide. Korea is no
exception. If you take a subway or a bus in Korea, you will see many people of all ages
engrossed in their mobile devices. Almost every teenager and adult in Korea has a
smartphone. The Statista (2014) reported that 97.7 percent of Internet users in Korea,
between the ages of 18 and 24, own a smartphone. They watch television, access social
networking sites (SNS), listen to music, text and call, send e-mails, and perform various other
W
daily tasks on their smartphones. In Korea, life is virtually mobile (Choe, 2009). In addition
to this “smartphone fever,” the English education boom in Korea in recent years has
IE
encouraged the development of smartphone applications (apps) to support different aspects of
EV
English learning including vocabulary, reading, listening, speaking, grammar, and writing.
Mobile apps are proliferating rapidly and may make desktop computing obsolete (Godwin-
Jones, 2011).
PR
The rapid emergence of the smartphone has enabled foreign language learners to
practice their target language skills “anywhere, anytime” (Geddes, 2004, p. 1) and to access
various apps, which provide an ideal platform for informal, individualized learning (Godwin-
Jones, 2011; Steel, 2012). The growth in the number of smartphone users has boosted the
to understand the potential impact of smartphones on foreign language learning and students’
English learning apps, few studies have explored students’ acceptance and usage patterns of
smartphone apps for English language learning (SAELL). Therefore, this paper explores
Mobile learning (m-learning) refers to the use of mobile devices such as mobile
phones, handheld PDAs, and smartphones in learning without constraints in time or place
(Demirbilek, 2010; Kukulska-Hulme & Shield, 2007). Rapid technological advances over the
past years have inspired language educators to adopt mobile devices in their teaching and
learning environments (Stockwell & Hubbard, 2013). Many studies have been conducted to
explore the possibilities of foreign language learning with mobile devices (Chinnery, 2006;
Hu, 2010; Kukulska-Hulme, 2009; Levy, 2009; Miangah & Nezarat, 2012; Ota, 2015; Smith
& Wang, 2013; Thornton & Houser, 2005). The adoption of mobile devices in foreign
W
language learning improves different aspects of L2 language learners’ English language skills,
such as vocabulary (Kevin & Levy, 2008; Stockwell, 2010; Tafazoli & Jam, 2015; Thornton
IE
& Houser, 2005), reading comprehension (Chen & Hsu, 2008; Foomami & Hedayati, 2016;
EV
Huang & Lin, 2011; Lan, Sung, & Chang, 2007), grammar (Baleghizadeh & Oladrostam,
2010; Guerrero, Ochoa, & Collazos, 2010; Wang & Smith, 2013), listening (Azar & Nasiri,
2014; Rahimi & Soleymani, 2015), and speaking (Demouy & Kukulska-Hulme, 2010;
PR
Kukulska-Hulme & Shield, 2007; Liu, 2009 ). Portability, accessibility, interactivity, and
individualized learning are important components of MALL, and these characteristics have
been proven through recent studies (Chinnery 2006; Fujimoto, 2012; Hu, 2010; Kukulska-
Hulme & Shield, 2007; Miangah & Nezarat, 2012; Steel, 2012). Moreover, the effectiveness
of smartphone apps in language learning has been discussed in different countries (Faqe,
2015; Kim & Kwon, 2012; Kwon, 2013a; Ota, 2015; Park, 2013; Seo & Choi, 2014; Weng &
Chen, 2015).
Mobile apps have become pervasive in our daily lives and are now evolving into an
ideal platform for foreign language learning (Pindeh, Suki, & Suki, 2016). However, the
availability and accessibility of mobile apps do not guarantee their success in an educational
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG 3
context (Godwin-Jones, 2017; Liu, Li, & Carlsson, 2009). It is important to understand that
students’ acceptance of technology plays a critical role in determining the success of MALL.
If students perceive that a technology is useful and easy to use, they tend to show a positive
attitude, and higher satisfaction and motivation, which will drive them to capitalize on the
technology (Chung, Chen, & Kuo, 2015; Park, Nam, & Cha, 2012; Pindeh et al., 2016; Mtebe
& Raisamo, 2014; Nassuora, 2012). Thus, students’ perspectives towards and acceptance of
mobile apps are critical factors in successful m-learning. A number of studies have found that
MALL enhances learners’ motivations for English learning and positive attitudes towards
MALL (Demirbilek, 2010; Fujimoto, 2012; Kwon, 2013b; Kim, Rueckert, Kim, & Seo, 2013;
W
Steel, 2013; Yang, 2012). Therefore, students consider mobile devices as a vital tool for
more popular and diversified. Weng & Chen (2015) examined many positive factors
contributing to the smartphone's popularity in English learning and found the following: Four
Interesting, Dual-Purpose, and Effortless). They argued that the greatest benefit of the
smartphone is that English learning can happen anytime, anywhere. In addition, smartphone
apps can provide special functions for English learning such as authentic pronunciation,
adaptive testing, instant translation, and language drills that help improve learners’ language
proficiency. For instance, language drills including multimedia effects make language
learning more interesting, thus boosting learners’ motivation. Finally, smartphone apps can
supplement school work as students can learn simply by touching screens instead of browsing
proficiency is regarded as a necessary skill for Korean college students to get a job. Moreover,
with the rising popularity of mobile technology, both formal and informal education in Korea
is undergoing a shift from e-learning to m-learning (Jung, 2009 cited from Park et al., 2012).
Despite the favorable external circumstances for m-learning, it still faces challenges. While
numerous studies have investigated the use of mobile technologies in English language
learning, few studies have been conducted to research Korean college students’ acceptance
explore students' experiences with SAELL and examine various factors affecting their
W
acceptance of SAELL. In order to adopt SAELL in Korea’s educational environment,
educators and app developers need to understand how Korean college students use SAELL,
IE
and to what extent they accept them as a language learning tool. Thus, this study aims to fill
EV
in the gap in the current literature on the use of smartphone apps in order to support informal
With the rapid expansion of mobile devices, the number of smartphone owners has
increased significantly. As a result, the smartphone apps market has grown tremendously to
offer millions of smartphone apps to users (Godwin-Jones, 2011; Gregory, 2015). These apps
are easy to download and use. Furthermore, the increasing availability of free or inexpensive
smartphone apps also indicates that they are not only convenient, but also have a potential to
Kennedy, & Walker, 2011). The growth of smartphone users has brought a further potential
for MALL to be an efficient language learning tool for foreign language learners. Two large
app stores, Apple App Store and Google play, have offered millions of apps of all kinds to
their users since 2008. Users are able to download 2.2 million apps from Google Play and 2.2
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG 5
million apps from Apple App Store (Statista, 2016). In this huge pool of apps, there are a
large number of apps to teach English for foreign language learners. Nowadays, Android
phones are most popular in Korea (Gregory, 2015), and more than 500 English learning apps
were available for Android users in 2012 (Kwon, 2013a). These apps are easily
Smartphone apps vary tremendously in purpose, design and scope, and they allow
students to engage in various types of informal language learning outside the classroom. As
informal language learning is likely to take place on apps chosen by students themselves, not
W
SAELL and identify important factors affecting their decision to use SAELL. Moreover, this
study focuses on Korea, which has distinguishing characteristics in terms of its strong IT
IE
infrastructure and enthusiasm for English education. These characteristics may directly
EV
impact the adoption of SAELL. This research will help facilitate a better understanding of
students’ acceptance and use of SAELL as well as challenges in accepting and using SAELL
in Korea.
PR
The purpose of this study is to investigate Korean EFL college students’ acceptance
of smartphone apps as a language learning tool, how and to what extent they are using them
for informal English learning, how gender and academic major influence their acceptance of
SAELL, and the barriers to using SAELL. This research developed a model for analyzing the
relationship between students’ intention to use smartphone apps for English language
learning (SAELL) and variables such as perceived usefulness, perceived convenience, social
contribute to the understanding of how Korean college students accept and use smartphone
apps to support their informal English learning. Moreover, this study will provide new
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG 6
factors affecting students’ acceptance of SAELL and their usage patterns. Thus, they will be
able to use this information in developing and investing in more useful smartphone apps for
students. In addition, this study explores the barriers to using SAELL in order to offer useful
There are various types of mobile devices used in m-learning such as tablets, PDAs,
mobile phones, laptop computers, etc. However, the present study will focus only on the use
Research Questions
W
The following research questions will investigate Korean college students’ acceptance
IE
and use of smartphone apps technology in informal English learning.
EV
RQ1. How and to what extent do students use smartphone apps in English language learning?
RQ2. How do the following factors affect students’ desire to use smartphone apps for English
RQ3. How do moderators (i.e. gender and academic major) influence students’ acceptance of
SAELL?
Research Design
barriers to using SAELL. The data were collected by a Likert scale questionnaire. The
statements of the questionnaire were developed based on the MALL theory and two
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG 7
(UTAUT) model proposed by Venkatesh, Morris, Hall, Davis, and Walton (2003) and
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) proposed by Davis (1989). Collected data were
analyzed by the Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) and Statistical Package for the
Social Sciences (SPSS) systems. Confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS 22.0 was
convergent validity, and discriminant validity. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics,
Participants
W
Participants in this study consisted of 675 Korean EFL college students from seven
colleges in Korea. They were undergraduate students aged from 20 to 28. Among them,
IE
females were 512 and males were 163. The participants were divided two different academic
EV
majors to investigate the effect of academic major as a moderator: English-related majors and
non-English majors. English-related majors were 348, and non-English majors were 326.
Since the purpose of this study is to identify students’ usage patterns of and desire to use
PR
SAELL, the prerequisite was smartphone ownership. The respondents who did not own a
Instruments
In this study, data were collected by a questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed
by the researcher to investigate students’ acceptance of SAELL and their usage patterns. The
questionnaire was developed based on the previous scholarly literature in this field. The
survey consists of 50 questions including Yes / No, multiple choice and Likert scale
(5=Strongly agree, 1=Strongly disagree) questions. The survey instrument for this study
designed to identify students’ demographic information such as gender, age, academic major,
and smartphone ownership. Part II is designed to explore students’ usage patterns of SAELL.
Participants were asked about the following information: experiences of using SAELL, the
number of SAELL installed, types of SAELL, the number of paid apps installed, and time
and place for using the apps. Parts I and II consist of 11 questions using Yes / No and
multiple choice questions. Part III consists of 24 Likert scales (5=Strongly agree, 1=Strongly
disagree) questions that gather information on students’ acceptance of SAELL and is divided
into six subsections: perceived usefulness, perceived convenience, social influence, perceived
W
asking the barriers to using SAELL. Part IV consists of 14 multiple choice questions. The
questions were developed based on the validated questionnaires from previous studies and
IE
modified for the purpose of this research. In addition, the questionnaire was evaluated by
EV
class professors and peer students in order to assess its content validity.
Before the survey was conducted, the questionnaire was revised based on the
PR
feedback from professors and peer students to assess its content validity. The questionnaire
was translated into Korean to facilitate full understanding by the Korean students. The
questionnaire was sent to the survey administrator in Korea, who distributed it to college
professors. Professors from seven colleges agreed to conduct the survey with their students.
The students were given the questionnaire before or after class. All participants were
guaranteed confidentiality. Six hundred seventy-five questionnaires were collected from the
survey.
Data Analysis
Four types of data were collected from the survey, and SPSS and AMOS systems
were used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze usage patterns of
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG 9
SAELL and students’ perceptions towards the barriers to using SAELL. In order to assess the
convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS
was carried out to examine the relationship between five independent variables and a
dependent variable (students’ intention to use SAELL). General linear model was used to find
how moderators (gender and academic major) impact the acceptance of SAELL. Details on
Theoretical Frameworks
This study adopted two theoretical frameworks to examine students’ acceptance and
W
use of SAELL: MALL and technology acceptance models. MALL refers to the use of mobile
various mobile technologies into language learning process, it has grown fast and become a
key component of education. MALL is not new, but the widespread growth of smartphones
with powerful features including its connectivity, multimedia support, growing ubiquity, and
PR
communication capabilities, and language learning apps, has significantly impacted language
Technology acceptance models predict how users come to accept and use a
technology (Davis, 1989). Many technology acceptance theories have been developed to
explain the users’ acceptance of the technology. The most widely used models are UTAUT
proposed by Venkatesh et al. (2003) and TAM developed by Davis (1989). Although
technology acceptance models are widely used to explain users’ acceptance of technology, its
application to MALL has not received much attention. Venkatesh et al. (2003) encouraged
others to validate and test their models in various contexts. Wang, Wu, and Wang (2009) also
suggested that future research is needed on the acceptance and use of m-learning, with a
USING SMARTPHONE APPS IN EFL LEARNIG 10
focus on technology acceptance models. Therefore, this study employed UTAUT model as a
theoretical framework and partially adopted a variable from TAM model in order to
investigate students’ acceptance of smartphone apps for English language learning (SAELL).
The UTAUT model was amended to suit the context of MALL. A complete explanation of
Organization of Dissertation
This dissertation consists of five chapters. Chapter 1 introduces the study and explains
the methodology and theoretical frameworks of the study. It also introduces research
questions and discusses the background of the problem, the purpose and significance of the
W
study. Chapter 2 begins with a brief introduction of new technologies in the field of education
and introduces Web 2.0 in language education. Then, it discusses the concepts of mobile
IE
learning (m-learning) and mobile-assisted language learning (MALL). It also reviews the use
EV
of smartphone apps for language learning. Then, it discusses acceptance of m-learning based
on two technology acceptance models: UTAUT and TAM. It ends with a review on the use of
SAELL in Korea. Chapter 3 lays out the research methodology used in this study. It explains
PR
the theoretical framework of the study and the research model developed based on the
theoretical framework. Then, it discusses the research design, participants, instruments, data
collection, and data analysis that were used to investigate this study. Chapter 4 presents and
discusses the research outcome. Chapter 5 discusses the research findings, implications,
Effort Expectancy (EE): The degree to which learners perceive that using a particular