Professional Documents
Culture Documents
W7 Experimental Designs
W7 Experimental Designs
2
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT
• Simple comparative experiments
• The Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
• The Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD)
• The Latin Squares Design
3
SIMPLE COMPARATIVE
EXPERIMENTS
4
Simple Comparative Experiments
• Single factor with two treatments (or conditions, or
levels, or groups).
5
Posttest Only Control Group
Design
Groups Observation
Treatment
𝑦𝑦11
Experimental 𝑦𝑦12
group ⋮
𝑦𝑦1𝑛𝑛1
Experimental Random
units assignment
𝑦𝑦21
Control 𝑦𝑦22
group ⋮
𝑦𝑦2𝑛𝑛2
7
Pretest Posttest Control Group
Design
Pretest Posttest
Groups Observation Observation
Treatment
𝑦𝑦11 𝑦𝑦11
Experimental 𝑦𝑦12 𝑦𝑦12
group ⋮ ⋮
𝑦𝑦1𝑛𝑛1 𝑦𝑦1𝑛𝑛1
Randomly
assign units
to groups
𝑦𝑦21 𝑦𝑦21
Control 𝑦𝑦22 𝑦𝑦22
group ⋮ ⋮
𝑦𝑦2𝑛𝑛2 𝑦𝑦2𝑛𝑛2
9
Completely Randomized Design
(CRD)
• The runs of the experiments should be made in
random order.
• Randomly assigned a run to an experimental unit
i.e. each unit has the same chance of receiving any
treatment.
• Can be applied to most experiments.
• E.g. single factor in CRD, factorial in CRD.
10
Single Factor in CRD
• Single factor with more than two treatments (or
conditions, or levels).
11
Single Factor in CRD
Groups Observation
Treatment
Random
assignment 𝑦𝑦11
𝑦𝑦12
Treatment 1 ⋮
𝑦𝑦1𝑛𝑛1
𝑦𝑦21
Experimental 𝑦𝑦22
Treatment 2 ⋮
units (EU)
𝑦𝑦2𝑛𝑛2
⋮ ⋮ 𝑦𝑦𝑎𝑎1
𝑦𝑦𝑎𝑎2
Treatment 𝑎𝑎 ⋮
𝑦𝑦𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎
Total sample, 𝑁𝑁 = 𝑛𝑛1 + 𝑛𝑛2 + ⋯ + 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎 .
12
If sample size for each group is equal, then 𝑛𝑛1 = 𝑛𝑛2 = ⋯ = 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎 = 𝑛𝑛.
Single Factor in CRD
Treatment
1 2 … 𝑎𝑎
𝑖𝑖 = 1, 2, … , 𝑎𝑎
𝑗𝑗 = 1, 2, … , 𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖
where
𝜇𝜇 is the overall mean,
𝜏𝜏𝑖𝑖 is the treatment effect, and
𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 is the random error.
14
Balanced vs Unbalanced Design
Advantages of balanced design:
1. The test statistic is relatively insensitive to small
departures from the assumption of equal
variances for the treatments.
2. The power of the test is maximized.
15
RANDOMIZED
COMPLETE BLOCK
DESIGN (RCBD)
16
Randomized Complete Block
Design (RCBD)
• “Complete”: each block contains all treatments.
• Block = nuisance factor that is known and
controllable.
• Blocks form a more homogeneous experimental
unit – improves accuracy of the comparisons
among treatments by eliminating the variability
among the blocks.
• Within a block, the order in which the treatments
are tested is randomly determined i.e. blocks
represent a restriction on randomization.
17
Major criteria for blocking
1. Proximity: Animal litter – several treatments can be
accommodated by one litter.
2. Physical characteristic: Batches of raw materials – a
single batch large enough for one replication of all
treatments.
3. Time: Days – for when only one replication of
treatments can be processed in the lab in a single
day.
4. Management of tasks in experiment: Individual
technicians – each person is assigned to one replicate
of each treatment.
18
Single Factor in RCBD
Block 1 Block 2 Block 𝑏𝑏
⋯
𝑦𝑦11 𝑦𝑦12 𝑦𝑦1𝑏𝑏
𝑦𝑦21 𝑦𝑦22 𝑦𝑦2𝑏𝑏
⋮ ⋮ ⋮
𝑦𝑦𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑦𝑦𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑦𝑦𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎
Block
Treatment 1 2 … 𝑏𝑏
1 𝑦𝑦11 𝑦𝑦12 … 𝑦𝑦1𝑏𝑏
2 𝑦𝑦21 𝑦𝑦22 … 𝑦𝑦2𝑏𝑏
𝑖𝑖 = 1, 2, … , 𝑎𝑎
𝑗𝑗 = 1, 2, … , 𝑏𝑏
where
𝜇𝜇 is the overall mean,
𝜏𝜏𝑖𝑖 is the treatment effect,
𝛽𝛽𝑗𝑗 is the block effect, and
𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 is the random error.
21
Latin Square Design
22
Latin Square Design
• Blocking in two directions i.e. two restrictions on
randomization.
• A 𝒑𝒑 × 𝒑𝒑 Latin square is a Latin square for
𝑝𝑝 treatments containing 𝑝𝑝 rows and 𝑝𝑝 columns.
• Each treatment is denoted by the Latin letter i.e.
𝐴𝐴, 𝐵𝐵, 𝐶𝐶, … .
23
Example of a Latin square design
Operators
Batches of
Raw
1 2 3
Material
1 A B C
2 B C A
3 C A B
24
Examples of Latin squares
25
Standard Latin Squares
26
The Effects Model
𝑦𝑦𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑘𝑘 = 𝜇𝜇 + 𝛼𝛼𝑖𝑖 + 𝜏𝜏𝑗𝑗 + 𝛽𝛽𝑘𝑘 + 𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑘𝑘
𝑖𝑖 = 1, 2, … , 𝑝𝑝
𝑗𝑗 = 1, 2, … , 𝑝𝑝
𝑘𝑘 = 1, 2, … , 𝑝𝑝
where
𝜇𝜇 is the overall mean,
𝛼𝛼𝑖𝑖 is the row effect,
𝜏𝜏𝑗𝑗 is the treatment effect,
𝛽𝛽𝑘𝑘 is the column effect, and
𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 is the random error.
27