Technical Assessment Guidelines

Chemical Product Design Class Competition

Chemical Engineering Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Saturday, 9 December 2023
1. The Chemical Product Design Class Competition 2023 is scheduled for Saturday, December 9, 2023, at 08.00 –
12.00 in LABTEK X Building, Jl. Ganesha No. 10, Bandung.

2. The competition is split into 2 major categories (Leave-on and Rinse-off Products) as follows:
Category Leave-on Rinse-off
Paragon Judges 1. Anita Fajrin 1. Mario Kristiono
2. Ratu Annisa Amalia 2. Nur Huda Afif Indiarto
Independent Judge 1. Fariz Muharram Hasby 1. Sumantri Ishak
Internal Judges 1. Johnner Sitompul 1. Dewa Gede Arsa Putrawan
2. Dendy Adityawarman 2. Hary Devianto
3. Hafis Pratama Rendra Graha 3. Graecia Lugito
Exhibition Venue: Gallery, Labtek X
08.00-08.30 Each group presented their respective product and X-banner
Pitching Leave-on (X-317) Rinse-off (X-356)
Presentation Group Product Group Product
08.30-08.45 K01-SC1 Kalimera Tinted Sun Stick K01-PC1 Luminara Facial Scrub
08.45-09.00 K01-SC4 SunKiss K02-PC4 Luxemold: Hairstyle Powder
09.00-09.15 K03-SC2 Hydro Glow Sun Gel K02-PC5 Bellehaire Shampoo Capsule
09.15-09.30 K01-SC2 SunGlow Duo K03-PC1 Shampoo Bar
09.30-09.45 K02-SC1 Spray & Protect K02-PC1 EXO-U Exfoliating Bodywash
09.45-10.00 K01-PC3 Sunscreen Spray Moisturizer K02-PC3 ALLE Bacne Solution
10.00-10.15 K02-SC2 GlowE MoisChErizer K02-PC6 Férra Gentle Body Cleanser
10.15-10.30 K01-SC3 SKIDO K03-PC2 Skinsensia Facewash
10.30-10.45 K01-PC2 Seungit Scent Stick K01-PC4 WillowShine
10.45-11.00 K03-SC1 Mosquino Sanitizer K01-PC5 Glamgone Mascara Remover
11.00-11.15 K02-PC2 Reense Bodywash spray
11.15-11.30 K02-SC3 Mo&En Lip Gloss
Announcement
Venue: Gallery, Labtek X
11.30-12.00
* The duration of the presentation per group is 5 minutes.
** The duration of questions and answers per group is 10 minutes.

3. The assessment rubric is attached to this document and the assessment form can be accessed via:
https://bit.ly/CPD-scoringform

4. Booklet (pdf) and presentation slides (pdf) can be accessed via:

Leave-on Product Category : https://bit.ly/CPD-Leaveon

Rinse-off Product Category : https://bit.ly/CPD-Rinseoff

5. Peer review assessment can be accessed via: https://bit.ly/CPD-peer

6. All participants, judges, and guests are given 2 (two) voting rights in the form of stickers to select the best
product of each category. They could vote by sticking the stickers (PINK for leave-on product and BLUE for rinse-
off product) on the X-banner of their selected products.

1/4
ASSESSMENT RUBRIK FOR REPORT
FINAL PROJECT ASSIGNMENT
TK4104 CHEMICAL PRODUCT DESIGN
Semester I-2023/2024 Group:
4 Score 1
PRODUCT CONCEPT (45%)
Needs (15%) clear introduction to the needs, supported Need statements are not supported by any
by enough number (40) of relevant survey survey and provided data are irrelevant.
correspondences, including 'lead user' and Fail to provide an acceptable
has logical analyses. competitors’ analysis and a
Provide a comprehensive reasonable estimate on market
competitors’ analysis and a size.
reasonable estimate on market
size with sound justification.
Ideas (10%) Generates more than 5 ideas, and has a Generates less than 3 ideas
logic idea selection process
Conceptual Explain clearly and Fail to explain why the product
claims (20%) quantitatively on why the is designed as is. Major product
product is designed as is. Major attributes are not supported
product attributes are designed with scientific and engineering
and supported with sound principles.
scientific and engineering
principles.

PRODUCT MANUFACTURE (30%)

Specification Provide quantitative material and product Fail to provide quantitative material &
(5%) specifications completely with clear product specifications.
explanations on the logic behind it
Production Describe clearly and quantitatively the Fail to describe a reasonable
process (10%) process required to manufacture the process to manufacture the
product, with clear explanations on the product
logic behind it
Performances Product address the needs, supported by Fail to address the needs
(5%) paten, publication, pilot plant analyses,
etc.
Economic Provide a sound and justifiable financial Provide a financial analysis with quite a
Analyses (10%) analysis number of errors and mistakes
WRITINGS (25%)
Presentation complete information, supported by incomplete information, with many irrelevant
(10%) relevant graphs/images, and appealing. graphs/images.

Organization Good organization at the level No logical sequencing or

(10%) of each point and sentence. Easy to organization of topics.
follow. Impossible to follow.

Language (5%) Coherent, good language consistency. many typos, incoherent, mixed languages.

2/4
ASSESSMENT RUBRIK FOR PRESENTATION
FINAL PROJECT ASSIGNMENT
TK4104 CHEMICAL PRODUCT DESIGN
Semester I-2023/2024
# Criteria
4 3
Technical skills Give a clear introduction of the
1 Product introduction product and define the design
(5%) scenario clearly.
Provide a comprehensive competitors’
Market study and
analysis and a reasonable estimate on
identification of
2 market size with sound justification.
product attributes
Identify the most important product
(10%)
attributes to be designed.
Product
Explain clearly and quantitatively why
conceptualization
the product is designed as is. Major
(ingredients and
3 product attributes are designed and
product structure)
supported with sound scientific and
(30%)
engineering principles.
Describe clearly and quantitatively the
Product manufacture
process required to manufacture the
4 (20%)
product, with clear explanations on the
logic behind it.
Financial analysis Provide a sound and justifiable
5
(10%) financial analysis.
6 Organization & Good organization at the level of each
Teamwork (10%) point and sentence. Good transitions
from one point to another. Audience
can follow the train of thought of the
speaker and form a clear mental
picture.
Provide to-the-point and thoughtful
Questions & answers. Good command of the
7 Answers (10%) discussion, with meaningful back-and-
forth with audience. Graceful
response to difficult questions.
Slides are clear, appealing and error-
free. Innovative and appropriate use
8 Visual aids (5%) of figures or animations to explain
concepts. Slides complement the
speech well.
Group:
Explanation
Give a clear introduction of the
product, but the design scenario is
not sufficiently clear.
Provide a comprehensive
competitors’ analysis and a
reasonable estimate on market size,
but with weak reasoning. Identify the
most important product attributes to
be designed.
Explain clearly why the product is
designed as is. Major product
attributes are designed with scientific
and engineering principles, but with
minor mistakes in the analysis.
Describe clearly the process required
to manufacture the product, but the
reasoning is not sufficiently clear.
Provide a financial analysis with
justification for most of the numbers
but fail to justify all parameters.
Good organization at the level of
main messages. Mostly sensible
sequence of topics. Occasional
unclear transitions
from point to point.
Respond to all questions with
mostly to-the-point answers.
Q&A is largely unilateral. Do
not know how to handle
difficult questions.
Slides are adequate to deliver
messages most of the time.
Occasionally effective use of figures
or animations. Slides somewhat
complement the speech.
3/4
Score
2 1
Give an acceptable introduction of the
Fail to introduce the product and
product, but the design scenario is not
the design scenario clearly.
defined clearly.
Fail to provide an acceptable
Provide an acceptable competitors’
competitors’ analysis and a
analysis and a reasonable estimate on
reasonable estimate on market
market size, but with weak reasoning.
size. Fail to identify major
Fail to identify the major product
product attributes to be
attributes to be designed.
designed.
Explain why the product is designed
as is, but not with sufficient details to Fail to explain why the product
allow clear understanding. Major is designed as is. Major product
product attributes are designed with attributes are not supported with
scientific and engineering principles, scientific and engineering
but with major mistakes in the principles.
analysis.
Describe the process required to
Fail to describe a reasonable
manufacture the product, but without
process to manufacture the
enough quantitative results and the
product.
reasoning behind is not clear.
Provide a financial analysis without
justification for most of the numbers, Provide a financial analysis with
and occasionally incorrect for some many errors and mistakes.
calculations.
Basic organization at the overview No logical sequencing or
level only. Only occasional logical organization of topics.
transition Impossible to follow.
between each slide or each sentence.
Use terms or concepts before they are
introduced or defined.
Provide incomplete,
dead-ended, and sometimes Fail to comprehend or respond
irrelevant answers. Appear to most questions.
defensive or diffident.
Some slides are poorly designed,
Most slides are poorly designed,
unclear or error-prone. Little or
unclear, error-prone. Slides
ineffective use of figures. Slides and
appear to be hastily put together
speech do not complement each other
without much care.
very much.
ASSESSMENT RUBRIK FOR PROTOTYPE
FINAL PROJECT ASSIGNMENT
TK4104 CHEMICAL PRODUCT DESIGN
Semester I-2023/2024 Group:
Explanation
# Criteria Score
5 4 3 2 1
Claims
1 Claims are attractive Has no attractive claim
(20%)

Concept(s) are There is 1 inaccurate/ There are 3 or more

Substances accurate/correct, questionable concept inaccurate/questionable
2
(20%) complete, and in that does not match the concepts that do not
accordance with claims. claim. match the claim.

Transformative (having Variation (slight

Original (unique, Combination
Creativity characteristics like modification, replacing Duplication (imitation of
3 consider sustainable (combining two or more
(20%) existing products but in or adding one an existing product)
aspects). existing products)
a different form). ingredient/function)

Superior/disruptive
The way of working is
(different ways of Little innovation
Innovation different but does not
4 working, changing Increased functionality (increased efficiency, Without innovation
(20%) change the
current systems and decreased material use)
system/habits
user habits)
Product
presentation & Attractive and
5 Average Poorly presented
Packaging substantive
(20%)

Bandung, December 2023

Evaluator

4/4