FORM INTERNSHIP 81 LESSON PLAN AND DELIVERY EVALUATION FORM Name Sih Sang, sect. Gorges owe JENN 23 tate Saath 6 Tine: 140 (520 Instructions: Read through the evaluation criteria and circle the mast appropriate score for each criterion. Provide comments for each ‘Section as relevant/appropriate. (CRITERIA MARKING KEY: Criteria for Grading ‘Comments 1 ‘Lesson Pian | The lesson plan was organized correctly, wth appropriate goals and objectives 2 7 ie students were given very clear behavioral expectations ‘© Glossroom rules were reinforced. 3 Anticipatory Set/Introduction to the Lesson The teacher gained the children’s attention «The css was quiet, seated and wating in anticipation. [+A teacher used ois, pictures to stimulore students curiosity «The teacher used an element of surprise to create curiosty ond interest wth his/her students 4 yal siepsin © The lesson had a logical flow. emember, however, that you teach children not the lon. Therefore, procedural steps can change or be altered when appropnate + Be fexible to capture a teachable moment 5 Content [|e The teacher nas a good working knowledge and understanding ofthe topic and objectives | sContent wos delivered accurately and confidently EH SPSS SoT nner jeye contact = Confident: encouraged students to participate + Positive faciol expressions ‘+ Student-centered methodology ‘Voice Projection ‘© ear diction and enunciation Le--voice pitched ot an audible level © Voice projection was appropriate and not above the oie of the class. Pace of the Lesson ¢ Aorropriate time foreach step inthe lesson (be enble) ‘© The lesson moved along at an appropriate pace. Rappod with students ‘© Teacher demonstrotes professional distance. L»Teacher was firm, assertive, far, and friendly. ‘© Teacher showed that good rapport is built on good teaching '* Teacher encouraged positive communication. ‘Questions © A good selection of HLQ (higher level questions) and LQ (lower level questions) mere asked. ‘© Wag time was oppropriate. + Teacher responded/accepted answers positively Additional questions extended the student's thinking. ‘Fee SSE ESE SSE 1 T/overheads/OVD © Charts/oooks/pictures/Objecs/arttocts * Drama * Games 2 ‘Stusent involvement * Students were actively patipoting and engaged in learning. + Collaborative learning process L<~ Students remained on task B Classroom management Whole class/ paited/ group teaching © Students were given clear expectations Students were well organized and on task © Behavioral expectations were reinforced 4 ‘Guided Practice © The teacher circulated amongst the students, ‘answering questions, explaining tasks and assisting when needed EE EE15, _ | Theteacher gave praise when students remained fox ive praise was given for appropriate: Behavior; thoughtful answers; being on tas, etc. 16. | Closure ‘© The teacher returned tothe inital objectives to revise 4d appropriately sum up te eson at the conclusion 17. OVERALL SCORE ‘780 Gener nt 2 Strengths qe sdzdebt b. Areas of Improvements | Semmes lw lz3 ‘Supervising Teacher Date