FORM INTERNSHIP 1 LESSON PLAN AND DELIVERY EVALUATION FORM name Ske Sang suyect. Gemma ate Aat-adh, 2093 Ledet Jaci. 6 “Tone: 0.1020 Instructions: Read through the evaluation criteria and circle the most appropriate score for each criterion. Provide comments for each section as relevant/oppropriate. ITER S= Excelent 4 = Very Good 3 = Good 2 = Average 1 = Needs Improvernent Giiteria for Grading = Comments 1 esson Plan ‘+ The lesson plan was organized correctly, wth ‘appropriate goats and objectives. 2 | lear Behavioral Expectations ‘© The students were given very clear behavioral expectations. ‘* Classroom rules were reinforced. ry palo Sa : +The teacher gained the children’s attention, + The closs wos quiet seated and waiting in anticipation, ‘+The teacher used aids, 17, pictures to stimulate | student's curiosity. ‘+The teacher used an element of surprise to create ‘curiosity and interest with his/her students 4 Procedural steps n were folk +The lesson had a logical flow. ‘= Remember, however, that you teach children not the plan. Therefore, procedural steps can change or be dttered when appropriate. | + Be flexible to capture a teachable moment }5 | Conten ! ‘= The teacher has 0 good working knowledge and | _ understanding of the topic and objectives Content was delivered accurately and confidently 6 | Teaching manner | | = Good eye contact te + Confident, encouraged students to portuipatePositive facial expressions = Student-centered methodology Voice Projection ‘© Clear diction and enunciation + Voice pitched at an audible fevel ‘+ Voice projection was oppropriate and not above the noise of the cass Pace of the Lesson ‘+ Appropriate time for each step in the lesson (be flexible) + The lesson moved along at an appropriate pace. ‘Rapport with students ‘+ Teacher demonstrates professional distance. ‘+ Teacher was firm, assertive, foir, and friendly. ‘+ Teocher showed that good rapport is buit on good teaching. ‘+ Teacher encouraged positive communication. 0 Questions ‘+ A good selection of HLQ (higher level questions) and LLQ (lower level questions) were asked. + Wait time was appropriate + Teacher responded/accepted answers positively. + Additional questions extended the students thinking. Lesson! + IT-PPT/overheads/DVD ‘+ Charts/books/pctures/Objects/artifacts ‘© Drama © Gomes ssources/Aids/Materials @. Student Invalvenent ‘© Students were actively participating and engaged in ‘earning + Collaborative leaming process. Students remained on task B Classroom mi nt Wh teaching ‘© Students were given clear expectations ‘© Students were well organized and on task ‘Behavioral expectations were reinforced G answering questions, explaining tasks and assisting when sceded‘The teacher gave praise when students remained a focused, Positive praise was given for appropriate: Behavior, thoughtful answers; being on task, etc. 6. ‘Closure = The teacher returned to the ntial objectives to revise ‘and oppropriately sum up the lessan at the conclusion, “HEE 7. ‘OVERALL SCORE 780 General Comments; a. Strengths b. Areas of Improvements Saamd Supervising Teacher FORM INTERNSHIP 8.2 Date 2ahiies