FORM INTERNSHIP 8.1 LESSON PLAN AND DELIVERY EVALUATION FORM ‘ : : th . Name. Sinh, Song Sulpedt. Social. Studies date Nev. T* 2003 Levels G Tacinth Time, 4:05-4:40 Instructions Read through the evaluation critena and circle the most appropriate score for each criterion. Provide comments for each section as relevant/appropriate. (CRITERIA MARKING KEY: = Average = Needs improvement s 4 2 2 ‘ Criteria for Grading Comments i Lesson Plan| ‘The lesson plan was organized correctly, with ‘appropriate goats and objectives 2 Behavioral +The students were given very lear behavioral expectations # Classroom rules were reinforced 3. | Anticipatory Set/ntroduction to the Lesson The teacher gained the children's attention. 1e class was quiet, seated and waiting in anticipation, «The teacher used aids, IT, pictures to stumulate student's curiosity. + The teacher used an element of surprise to create curiosity and interest with his/her students 4 Procedural steps in the: m he lesson had o logical flow. «Remember, however, that you teach children nat the plan. Therefore, procedural steps can change or be altered when oppropriate * Be fexble to capture a teachable moment | «he teacher hos a good working knowledge ond | understanding of the topic and objectives. + Content was delivered accurately and confidently. ‘EELS SEE ESETeaching manner {+ Good eye contact Confident; encouraged students to participate ‘© Positive facial expressions ‘© Student-centered methodology | vesetrexcton dition and enunciation Voice pitched at an auaibe level * Voice projection was appropriate and not above the noise ofthe class. Pace of the Lesson | 2-Aopropriate time for each step in the lesson (be flexible) ‘+ The lesson moved along at an appropriate pace. Ra nl wteather demonstrates professional distance, ‘¢ Teacher was firm, assertive, fair, and friendly. ‘© Teacher showed that good rapport is built on good teaching. '*| Teacher encouraged positive communication, 10. Questions ‘© A good selection of HLQ (higher level questions) and UL (ower level questions) were asked time wos appropriate, ‘+ Teacher responded/accepted answers positively. ‘Additonal questions extended the student's thinking. 1 iveness of the Lessor’ ria -PPT/overheads/DVO © Charts/books/pictures/Objects/ortifacts © Drama = Games 2 vernent s-Stodents were actively participating and engaged in learning. * Collaborative learning process ‘+ Students remained on task B. room mar fa utes wee given clear expectations | Students were well organized and on task + Aeehavioral expectations were reinforced Pract The teacher circulated amongst the students, ‘answering questions, explaining tasks and assisting when needed. 3S ESHELF PSaise nts 1 5 focused. ‘© Positive praise was given for appropriate: Behavior; Al J thoughtful answers; being on task, etc ‘Closure 1 5 ‘The teacher returned to the intial objectives to revise [3 and appropriately sum up the lesson at the conclusion. [~(3 ‘OVERALL SCORE. 720 eral Com 2. Strengths a5 Powe’ poi} is Lassen Plan is good b. Areas of Improvements © Sloe aoe, ia aiken! 04 to |! cell organized hin lesson, end not Paving > jae ent of the lesson_ . vsheet = = Please, gr ve cov. ay ee Scama 4 lil2e Supervising Teacher Datel