| FORM INTERNSHIP 1 LESSON PLAN AND DELIVERY EVALUATION FORM jt Name/ Sith, Seng, subject Social. Stuchis Date Sep. a4 2023 Level: Sociath © Ting = Slo-%'S0 1:20 12300 Instructions: Read through the evaluation criteria and circle the most aporopnate score foreach crtern. Provide comments for each section as relevant/appropniate (CRITERIA MARKING KEY. 4 = Excelent 4 = Very Good 3. = Good 2 = Average 1 = Needs Improvenent Crtera for Grading Comments 1 ‘Lesson Pian ‘© The lesson plan was organized correctly, with ‘percpriate goals and objectives 2 | Gear Behavioral Expectations ‘s The students were given very clear behavioral expectations © Classroom rules were reinforced 3. | Antidpatory Set/introduction to the Lesson ‘The teacher gained the chidren’s attention The closs was quet, seated ond wating in antczation «The teacher used ads, 17, pictures to strmsiote student's curosty z + Theteacher used an element of surprise to create curiosity and interest with his/her students. | 4 “Procedural steps in the lesson were followed, 5 = Thelesson had a latcal flow 4 ‘© Remember, however, that you teach children not the ra] | lon Therefore, procedural steps can change or be 3 tiered when appropriate 7 1+ Be flexible to capture a teachable moment 5. Content ‘» The teacher has a good working knowledge and understanding of the topic and objectives 5 + Content was delvered accurately and confidently =~Teaching manner = Good eye contact * Confident; encouraged students to participate + Postve facia expressions = Student-centered methodology ace ‘Voice Projection ‘© Clear diction and enunciation ‘= Woice pitched at an audibe level ‘© Voice projection was appropriate and not above the noise of the class -A is Pace ofthe Lesson Appropriate time foreach step in the lesson (be fenbie) ‘© The lesson moved along at an appropriate pace. Lee ‘Rappon with students ‘© Teacher demonstrates professional distance Teacher was frm, assertive. far, and friendly. ‘© Teacher showed that good rapport is built on good teaching «© Teacher encouraged postive communication 0. ‘Questions ‘© A good selection of HLQ (higher level questions) 0nd UQ (lower level questions) were asked «© Wait time was appropriate = Teacher responded/accepted answers positively. «Additional questions ertended the student's thinking. 1 f ni -PPT/overheads/DVD ‘= Charts/books/pictures/Objects/ortifacts © Drama © Games 2 ‘Student Involvement «Students were actively participating and engaged in ‘earring. * Collaborative learning process. + Students remained on task B iT wh teaching + Students were given clear expectations Ls Students were well organized and on task ‘© Behavioral expectations were reinforced 4 Guided Practice The teacher circulated amongst the students, onswering questions, explaining tasks and assisting when needed. FE HEPES SEES PE15. ‘= Positive praise was given for appropriate’ Behavior, ; thoughtful answers, being on task, etc 2 7 16 | Cosure 5 ‘The teacher returned tothe intial objectives to revise : and appropriately sum up the lesson at the conclusion. 2 77 ‘OVERALL SCORE | 70 General Comments; a ey Job | - Goo Areas of improvements 6 Slow. lease - Tee aan fave More gvouP echvity | Saame Aley 6 lol23 Supervising Teacher Date