KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LIMITED

Name of Work : Construction of BD-9 from 1.000 Km to 2.000 Km offtaking at

18.600 Km of Tail End Distributary under N.R.B.C. Extension
including Lining & Structures

PROFORMA - 'A'
TO ACCOMPANY THE ESTIMATE FOR SANCTION AS PER CIRCULAR No. PWD 17
AIM 73, DATED 02-07-1973
A. ALIGNMENT AND PREPARATION OF ESTIMATE

1 Is the alignment of the Canal / Distributary / Channel Yes

thoroughly inspected and approved.
2 Are trial pits taken at 100m interval or at closer Trial pits are taken at 100m interval.
intervals if there is appreciable changes.
3 Are trial pits dug upto bed level / upto hard rock Yes. Up to CBL.

4 Are trial bores drilled upto CBL / upto hard rock -

5 Are trial pits are check measured 100% by Assistant Yes.

Executive Engineer
6 Is the statement of trial pits excavated giving location, Yes.
classification of soils in the trial pits duly furnishing the
certificate of verification by Assistant Executive
Engineer / Executive Engineer furnished.
7 Is the Estimate prepared KM wise ? Yes.

B CLASSIFICATION

8 Has the strata Classification done into three groups

mainly:
a) Earthwork excavation in all soils including removal of Yes.
boulders etc.,
b) Earthwork excavation in soft rock Yes.

c) Earthwork excavation in hard rock and big boulders Yes.

requiring blasting
C SCHEDULE OF RATES

9 While preparing the Estimate whether average rates Common S.R. for the year 2021-22
based on major classification in the trial pits is arrived considering issue rates of Cement /
at? steel for 2nd Quarter of FY 2022-23.

Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Engineer

KBJNL NRBC Division No.-18 KBJNL NRBC Division No.-6
Chikkahonnakuni Chikkahonnakuni
 KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LIMITED
Name of Work : Construction of BD-9 from 1.000 Km to 2.000 Km offtaking at
18.600 Km of Tail End Distributary under N.R.B.C. Extension
including Lining & Structures

PROFORMA - 'B'
TO ACCOMPANY THE ESTIMATE FOR SANCTION AS PER CIRCULAR No. PWD 17
AIM 73, DATED 02-07-1973

A DESIGN
1 Is section of the canal designed for approved Yes, enclosed.
discharge capacity in the reach and are designed
calculations enclosed to the Estimate
2 With reference to the slopes provided for the sides of Yes.
the canal is stable and optimum.
3 Are there any reaches where hard strata is met with? In water prism portion minimum 1:1
If so whether steeper slopes for canal sides have been side slope is proposesd. 1/2 :1 side
proposed on economic or other considerations. slope is proposed in hard rock above
water prism.
4 Are swelling type of soil met with? If so whether the Yes.
cohesive non swelling layer has been provided and is
optimum with reference to the canal in full cutting?
5 Are the widths of I.P and S.R as per the approved S.R. of 3.65 m width and I.P. of 1.8 m width are
design standards and whether their inner toes are kept proposed for BD's & S.R. of 3.05 m width and
at a margin of three meters from the edge of the canal I.P. of 1.2 m for width are proposed for Laterals
in full cutting? & Sub Laterals.

6 Whether the catch water drains are provided is Yes

sufficient to pass the discharge.
7 Whether all the useful materials available from the Yes
excavation are proposed to be made use of it.
8 Is turfing provided for the canal slopes in the soil No.
above water prism?
9 Are there any reaches where embankment is more No.
than 6m? If so whether the slopes are fixed by
detailed stability analysis.
10 Are the side slopes of the hearting core in the Yes.
embankment fixed taking into account the comparative
cost of casing and materials?
11 Is the L-Section of the reach enclosed. The CBL Yes
marked on the L-Section confirm to the approved CBL
for the reach. Is a plan giving contours, Nalla
crossings and other communication works enclosed.
Are the trial pits results, position of offtaking channels
etc., furnished on the L-Section.
12 Are there any diversions of nallas, if so how they are No.
proposed to be diverted. Whether the cost of
diversion is also included in the Estimate?
13 Does the Estimate provide for lining also? If so the Yes, C.C. Lining of M-15 grade with 20
type of lining whether the drawing enclosed as per mm and down MSA is proposed.
approved?
14 Are there any cross communications and CD works in Yes
the reach. Whether the details of nallas such as C.A.,
discharge, cross section of nalla and observed H.F.L.
are furnished.
15 Whether the approved alignment plan showing F.S.D. Yes
contour and 2/3 F.S.D contour is enclosed. Are the
fore bearing chainages, C.D works positions
furnished.
16 Whether the borrow area map on village map extract Yes
showing the different borrow area is enclosed?
17 Whether the cross sections in full cutting, partial Yes
cutting and partial embankment, full embankment
representing the particular reach is enclosed.
Whether they are confirming with approved typical
drawings?
18 Whether the stripping of base of embankment just the Yes
minimum required to remove the root zone and
organic materials?
19 Is the index map showing the location of the site and Yes.
alignment marked in different colours furnished?

Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Engineer

KBJNL NRBC Division No.-18 KBJNL NRBC Division No.-6
Chikkahonnakuni Chikkahonnakuni