You are on page 1of 3

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
DIVISION OF CITY SCHOOLS
Dapitan City
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANNEX D
QAME ANALYSIS FORM 1
ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS
(to be accomplished by Program Monitor In-charge)

Title of the Training Program: Personal Financial Management Seminar-Workshop


Inclusive Dates: November 19,2021
Learning Service Provider (Division/TEI): DepEdDapitan City Schools Division Class Section: 1
Venue: Dapitan City Conference Hall, Dapitan City Division Office Proponent: Accounting
NAME OF MONITOR: Nueva A. Andag Date Monitored: November 19,2021
Mobile number of Monitor: 0905 417 4354

PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation

Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observations of the On-Site monitor,
answer the following questions:

1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator?

It provides an ample information for the participants on saving. Facilitators are knowledgeable and computer literate
.

2. Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible


REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
DIVISION OF CITY SCHOOLS
Dapitan City
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SESSION TITLE Strong Points Factors that helped Areas for Improvement Factors that may Recommended Steps to Address the
(This may be done have contributed to Issue/s. (Indicate whether action can be
through a Focus-Group the areas for immediate or long-term)
Discussion) improvement
(This may be done
through a Focus-
Group Discussion)
Training Sessions:Financial The sessions as a Reliable references Better internet Causes delay on the Address the problem on poor internet
Planning, Saving Budgeting, whole is an eye- provided connectivity conduct of the connectivity
Borrowing, Investing, Fraus and opener on financial sessions and the
scams, Financial Consumer participants
literacy and how it
Protection responses and
Average Session Rating:3.67
should be done. outputs
Facilitators: J. Macapanas, O. Give some important Addresses the raised do as speaker/facilitator none none
Miranda, LW. Amores, VR details issues of the
Suarez, J. Galleposo participants
Average Facilitator Rating:3.66
Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation

None None None


PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Training Management
Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following questions:

1. What are the strong points of the daily operations of the training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.

DAY Overall Rating Strong Points Areas for Improvement and Suggestions
DAY 1 3.55 The PMT were very accommodating towards the participants This kind of webinar should be given also to newly hired
teachers so that they will be also aware on financial dealings
queries and concerns
DAY 2 3.56 It provides an avenue for the participants to be More topics about financial literacy

financially literate.
DAY 3 3.57 Able to educate teachers in financial dealings. Include other teachers if possible
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
DIVISION OF CITY SCHOOLS
Dapitan City
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE RATING FOR 3.56
OPERATIONS
2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:

Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation
NONE NONE NONE
IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management Team for information and immediate action

PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from “1.0” – “4.0” )


Identify Class Section/s and Program Attainment of Delivery of Provision of Program Training Accommodations
batches Management Objectives Content Support Management Venue
Materials Team
BATCH 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
BATCH 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
BATCH 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:
SIGNIFICANT LEARNING:
Income-savings=expenses
Spending money wisely
The needs and wants
FURTHER LEARNING:
Strategies and ideas on how to plan budgets and use money wisely.
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT:
The training gives great impact to the financial aspects and knowledge of the participants

Submitted by: LORA WENELLA M. AMORES Copy Given to: QAME Division Coordinator Noted by:
On-site Monitor In-Charge SEPS-SMME

Recommending Approval: Approved by:

CES SGOD Schools Division Superintendent

You might also like