You are on page 1of 58

173 Buxton Industrial Drive

PO Box 870
Henniker NH 03242
(603) 428-3218
1-800-322-6949
www.michiecorp.com

DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
8’ x 5’-6” Twin Cell Box Culvert

Prepared For:
Weaver Brothers
PO Box 1336
Concord, NH 03301

Project Information:
Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

X
______ Reviewed _____ Furnish As Corrected
______ Rejected ______ Revise and Resubmit

This review is only for general conformance with the design concept and the information
given in the Construction Documents. Corrections or comments made on the shop
drawings during the review do not relieve the Contractor from compliance with the Michie Project No: 3935
requirements of the Plans and Specifications. Review of a specific item shall not include
review of an assembly of which an item is a component. The Contractor is responsible
for dimensions to be confirmed and corrected at the job site; information that pertains
solely to the fabrication process or to the means, methods, techniques, sequences and
procedures of construction; coordination of the Work with that of other trades and
performing all Work in a safe and satisfactory manner.

Date August 16, 2013

By J. LUND
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 1 of 24
Project: Joppa Hill Rd
Task : 8x5-6 Twin Cell
Job No.: 3935
Client : Weaver Bros
Agency : None
CULVERT PROPERTIES
================== Design has verified to be in
Type of Culvert: Precast accordance with AASHTO LRFD
Specification : LRFD 5th Edition 2010
Operating Mode : ANALYSIS 6th Edition 2012

Physical Dimensions
-------------------
No. of Boxes: 2 Name: BoxCulvert
Clear Span : 8.0000 ft
Clear Height: 5.5000 ft Skew Angle : 0.00 deg
Length : 6.0000 ft
Bottom Slab Support: Full Slab
Fill Depth Range: Maximum : 1.99 ft Minimum: 0.00 ft Increment: 1.00 ft
Haunches: Top: 9.0000 in Bottom: 9.0000 in
Member Thicknesses: Top Slab: 10.0000 in
Bot Slab: 10.0000 in
Ext Wall: 8.0000 in
Int Wall: 8.0000 in
Material Properties
-------------------
Concrete: Strength,f'c: 6.000 ksi Density: 0.150 kcf Elasticity,Ec: 4696 ksi
Type: Normal Weight
Steel: Yield,fy: 60.00 ksi Allow Stress: 24.00 ksi Elasticity,Es: 29000 ksi
Yield,fyv: 60.00 ksi Diameter : 1.000 in
Soil: Density: 0.120 kcf Slope Factor: 1.150 (Granular)
Fe Factor: 1.150 (Maximum for Compacted Fill)
Serviceability, Gamma-e: 0.75
Loads
-----
Live Load: Vehicle: HL-93
Axle No. Weight(k) Dist. From Previous(ft)
1 8.00 0.00
2 32.00 14.00
3 32.00 14.00
Gage Width: 6.00 ft, Tread Width: 20.00 in, Tread Length: 10.00 in
Include Tandem: yes
Tandem: Axle 1: 25.00 k, Axle 2: 25.00 k, Axle Spacing: 4.00 ft
Lane Load: 0.64 klf, P-Moment: 0.00 k, P-Shear: 0.00 k
Combine: Truck + Lane Or Tandem + Lane
Include Lane Load: yes
Max. No. of Lanes: Computed by Program
Override MPF: no
Traffic Direction: Lanes Parallel to Main Reinforcement
Neglect Live Load for Large Fill Depths: yes
Apply Surcharge at Fill Depths > 2 foot: yes
Surcharge Depth : 3.00 ft
Dead Load: Future Wearing Surf.: 0.00 k/ft
Additional Dead Load: 0.00 k/ft
Concentrated Loads : none
Lateral Soil Loads: Max. Equiv. Fluid Press.: 60.00 pcf
Min. Equiv. Fluid Press.: 30.00 pcf
Fluid Pressures : Consider Int. Water Press.: no
Load and Resistance Factors
---------------------------
Max Min
DC: 1.25 0.90
DW: 1.50 0.65
EV: 1.30 0.90
EH: 1.35 0.90
WA: 1.00
LL I: 1.75 LL II: 1.35
Ductility: 1.00 Importance: 1.00 Redundancy: 1.00 Condition: 1.00 System: 1.00
Phi Shear: 0.90 Phi Moment: 1.00
Reinforcement
-------------
Rebar Covers: Exterior Interior
Top Slab: 2.0000 in 1.5000 in
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 2 of 24
Walls : 2.0000 in 2.0000 in
Bot Slab: 2.0000 in 2.0000 in
Assigned reinforcement: Spacing
Location Mark Size (in)
Top Slab Inside A100 (AS2) 6 10.0000
Bottom Slab Inside A200 (AS3) 5 10.0000
Top Slab Outside AE300(AS7) 6 10.0000
Bottom Slab Outside A400 (AS8) 6 10.0000
Top Corner AE1 (AS1) 6 10.0000
Bottom Corner A2 (AS1) 6 10.0000
Ext. Wall Inside B1 (AS4) 4 12.0000
Interior Wall B3 4 8.0000
Longitudinal C1 (AS6) 4 12.0000
Top Distribution C100 (AS5) 4 12.0000
Bottom Distribution C200 4 12.0000
Analysis Options
----------------
LL Analysis : Automatically Set Traffic Direction to Account for Skew Effects: no
Limit Distribution Width to Culvert Length for Fills < 2 foot: no
Limit Distribution Width to Culvert Length for Fills > 2 foot: no
Combine Axle Overlaps for Fills > 2 foot: yes
Override DLA: no
Axle Placement Increment for Moving Load Analysis: 20
Include Impact on Bottom Slab: yes
Always Distribute Wheel Load: no
Reinforcement: Always Include Distribution Steel: no
User Defined Longitudinal Steel: no
Max. As used in Vc Calcs: 2.00 in2/ft
Slenderness : Checked K Factor: 2.00
Modeling : Use Haunches in the Structural Model: yes
Crit. Section: Consider Haunches when Selecting Critical Section Locations: yes
Extend Critical Section for Shear Beyond the End of the Haunch: yes
Use Max. Moment with Max. Shear at the Critical Section for Shear: no
Misc. Options: Use Strength II: no
Ignore Axial Thrust: no
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 3 of 24
ANALYSIS RESULTS
================
Top Slab Thickness = 10.00 in
Bottom Slab Thickness = 10.00 in
Exterior Wall Thickness = 8.00 in
Interior Wall Thickness = 8.00 in
Modular Ratio (N) = 6.18
Max. Steel Ratio = 0.028
Design Span = 8.67 ft
Design Height = 6.33 ft
Volume of Concrete: 1.602 cy/ft Weight of Steel : 265 lb/ft
Reinforcing Steel Schedule
--------------------------
Bar Spacing As,prv Length Wgt H Leg V Leg
Location Mark Qty Size Type (in) (in2/ft) (ft-in) (lbs) (ft-in)(ft-in)
Top Slab (int) A100 (AS2) 8 6 STR 10.00 0.528 17- 7 211
Bot Slab (int) A200 (AS3) 8 5 STR 10.00 0.372 17- 7 148
Top Slab (ext) AE300(AS7) 8 6 STR 10.00 0.528 17- 7 211
Bot Slab (ext) A400 (AS8) 8 6 STR 10.00 0.528 17- 7 211
Corner (Top) AE1 (AS1) 16 6 L-BAR 10.00 0.528 8- 5 202 3- 6 4-11
Corner (Bottom) A2 (AS1) 16 6 L-BAR 10.00 0.528 6-11 166 2- 6 4- 5
Ext Wall (int) B1 (AS4) 12 4 STR 12.00 0.200 6- 0 49
Int Wall B3 18 4 STR 8.00 0.300 6- 9 83
Temperature ( 1) CE1 (AS6) 18 4 STR 12.00 0.200 5-11 72
Top Slab (int- 1) C100 (AS5) 17 4 STR 12.00 0.200 5-11 68
Bot Slab (int- 1) C200 17 4 STR 12.00 0.200 5-11 68
Temperature ( 1) C1 (AS6) 18 4 STR 12.00 0.200 5-11 73
Temperature ( 1) C1 (AS6) 14 4 STR 12.00 0.200 5-11 56
Temperature ( 1) C1 (AS6) 14 4 STR 12.00 0.200 5-11 56
Temperature ( 1) C1 (AS6) 14 4 STR 12.00 0.200 5-11 56
Total 1731
Note: A denotes flexural steel, B denotes vertical steel, C denotes longitudinal steel
Splice Lengths Table
--------------------
Bar Splice Length
Mark Size (ft-in)
B1 4 1- 9
B3 4 1- 9
C1 4 1- 9
CE1 4 1- 9
C100 4 1- 9
C200 4 1- 9
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 4 of 24
ANALYSIS RESULTS (Fill Depth = 0.00 ft)
================
Edge beams or shear connection to adjacent slab not required (LRFD 4.6.2.10.4)
Load Parameters:
---------------
Fe = 1.00
Unfactored Moments due to All Loads: (k-ft) (Fill Depth = 0.00 ft)
-----------------------------------
M-PT Mdc Mev Mdw Meh Mls Mwa Mll+ Mll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 -0.53 0.00 0.00 -0.77 -0.57 0.00 0.29 -1.72
1- 1 -0.49 0.00 0.00 -0.25 -0.24 0.00 0.00 -1.43
1- 2 -0.44 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.00 -1.38
1- 3 -0.40 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.20 0.00 0.00 -1.62
1- 4 -0.35 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.30 0.00 0.00 -1.86
1- 5 -0.31 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.34 0.00 0.18 -2.18
1- 6 -0.26 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.31 0.00 0.45 -2.59
1- 7 -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.20 0.00 0.73 -3.01
1- 8 -0.17 0.00 0.00 -0.07 0.02 0.00 1.03 -3.42
1- 9 -0.13 0.00 0.00 -0.34 -0.23 0.00 1.34 -3.84
1-10 -0.08 0.00 0.00 -0.64 -0.56 0.00 1.66 -4.26
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 -0.08 0.00 0.00 -0.64 -0.56 0.00 1.66 -4.26
2- 1 0.21 0.00 0.00 -0.54 -0.47 0.00 3.46 -1.40
2- 2 0.41 0.00 0.00 -0.44 -0.38 0.00 5.26 -0.09
2- 3 0.51 0.00 0.00 -0.33 -0.29 0.00 6.80 -0.23
2- 4 0.52 0.00 0.00 -0.23 -0.20 0.00 7.52 -0.73
2- 5 0.43 0.00 0.00 -0.12 -0.11 0.00 7.45 -1.32
2- 6 0.26 0.00 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 0.00 6.59 -1.91
2- 7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.00 5.09 -2.51
2- 8 -0.38 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.16 0.00 3.30 -3.18
2- 9 -0.84 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.25 0.00 1.63 -4.99
2-10 -1.39 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.34 0.00 0.00 -9.45
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.29 -2.29
3- 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.57 -1.57
3- 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 -0.85
3- 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 -0.25
3- 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 -0.61
3- 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.32 -1.32
3- 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.04 -2.04
3- 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.76 -2.76
3- 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.48 -3.48
3- 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.20 -4.20
3-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.92 -4.92
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 -0.53 0.00 0.00 -0.77 -0.57 0.00 0.29 -1.72
4- 1 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.65 -0.47 0.00 1.32 -0.46
4- 2 0.50 0.00 0.00 -0.52 -0.38 0.00 2.37 0.00
4- 3 0.75 0.00 0.00 -0.40 -0.29 0.00 3.10 0.00
4- 4 0.83 0.00 0.00 -0.27 -0.20 0.00 3.33 0.00
4- 5 0.73 0.00 0.00 -0.15 -0.11 0.00 3.00 0.00
4- 6 0.45 0.00 0.00 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 2.13 -0.10
4- 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.08 0.00 0.93 -1.08
4- 8 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.17 0.00 0.00 -2.88
4- 9 -1.44 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.26 0.00 0.00 -5.51
4-10 -2.42 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.35 0.00 0.00 -8.70
Right
Unfactored Shears due to All Loads: (k-ft) (Fill Depth = 0.00 ft)
----------------------------------
M-PT Vdc Vev Vdw Veh Vls Vwa Vll+ Vll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 5 of 24
Bottom
1- 0 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.57 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 1 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.46 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 2 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.34 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 3 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.23 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 4 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.12 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 5 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.09 0.00 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 6 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.22 -0.11 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 7 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.32 -0.23 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 8 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.40 -0.34 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1- 9 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.46 -0.45 0.00 0.51 -0.66
1-10 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.49 -0.57 0.00 0.51 -0.66
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 6.41 -0.68
2- 1 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 5.76 -0.94
2- 2 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 4.76 -1.43
2- 3 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 3.96 -2.06
2- 4 -0.04 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 3.22 -2.67
2- 5 -0.15 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 2.49 -3.40
2- 6 -0.26 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 1.79 -4.12
2- 7 -0.37 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 1.16 -4.92
2- 8 -0.48 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.64 -5.90
2- 9 -0.58 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.26 -6.81
2-10 -0.69 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.00 -7.36
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3- 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
3-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 -1.14
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 2.49 0.00
4- 1 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 1.85 0.00
4- 2 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 1.22 0.00
4- 3 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.58 0.00
4- 4 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.04 -0.23
4- 5 -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 -0.87
4- 6 -0.42 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 -1.51
4- 7 -0.62 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 -2.14
4- 8 -0.83 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 -2.78
4- 9 -1.03 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 -3.42
4-10 -1.23 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 -4.05
Right
Live Load Parameters: Traffic Direction is Parallel to Main Reinforcement
--------------------
Vehicle Axle Weight Dist. From
No. (k) Previous (ft)
Truck 1 5.70 0.00 (largest truck used)
2 5.70 14.00
3 1.43 14.00
Tandem 1 4.45 0.00 (largest truck used)
2 4.45 4.00
All Vehicles:
Distribution Width: 4.48 ft
Impact Factor : 1.33
Note: Distribution width is calculated for one wheel only.
Lane:
Lane Load : 0.077 k/ft Distribution Width: 10.00 ft
Truck Positions That Cause Maximum Results:
-------------------------------------------
Maximum +Moment in Top Slab
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 6 of 24
Vehicle Axle Weight Dist. From
No. (k) Left End (ft)
Truck 1 1.43 17.47
2 5.70 3.47
3 5.70 -10.53
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.33 k/ft
Maximum -Moment in Top Slab
Truck 1 1.43 19.20
2 5.70 5.20
3 5.70 -8.80
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.33 k/ft
Maximum +Shear in Top Slab
Truck 1 5.70 0.43
2 5.70 -13.57
3 1.43 -27.57
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.33 k/ft
Maximum -Shear in Top Slab
Truck 1 1.43 22.23
2 5.70 8.23
3 5.70 -5.77
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.33 k/ft
Maximum +Moment in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.45 7.47
2 4.45 3.47
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.51 k/ft
Maximum -Moment in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.45 6.60
2 4.45 2.60
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.51 k/ft
Maximum +Shear in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.45 4.33
2 4.45 0.33
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.51 k/ft
Maximum -Shear in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.45 8.33
2 4.45 4.33
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.51 k/ft
Maximum Deflection in Top Slab Due to Lane Load = 0.000 in
Unfactored Moments and Shears due to Live Loads: (k, k-ft) (Fill Depth = 0.00 ft)
-----------------------------------------------
Truck Tandem Lane
M-PT Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll- Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll- Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 0.28 -1.59 0.45 -0.62 0.22 -1.46 0.47 -0.63 0.01 -0.13 0.03 -0.04
1- 1 0.00 -1.30 0.45 -0.62 0.00 -1.19 0.47 -0.63 0.00 -0.13 0.03 -0.04
1- 2 0.00 -1.25 0.45 -0.62 0.00 -1.00 0.47 -0.63 0.00 -0.13 0.03 -0.04
1- 3 0.00 -1.49 0.45 -0.62 0.00 -1.25 0.47 -0.63 0.00 -0.13 0.03 -0.04
1- 4 0.00 -1.73 0.45 -0.62 0.00 -1.64 0.47 -0.63 0.00 -0.13 0.03 -0.04
1- 5 0.17 -1.98 0.45 -0.62 0.10 -2.04 0.47 -0.63 0.01 -0.14 0.03 -0.04
1- 6 0.42 -2.22 0.45 -0.62 0.38 -2.43 0.47 -0.63 0.02 -0.16 0.03 -0.04
1- 7 0.69 -2.49 0.45 -0.62 0.67 -2.83 0.47 -0.63 0.04 -0.18 0.03 -0.04
1- 8 0.96 -2.89 0.45 -0.62 0.97 -3.23 0.47 -0.63 0.06 -0.20 0.03 -0.04
1- 9 1.24 -3.28 0.45 -0.62 1.26 -3.62 0.47 -0.63 0.08 -0.22 0.03 -0.04
1-10 1.51 -3.68 0.45 -0.62 1.56 -4.02 0.47 -0.63 0.10 -0.24 0.03 -0.04
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 1.51 -3.68 5.34 -0.59 1.56 -4.02 6.12 -0.64 0.10 -0.24 0.30 -0.04
2- 1 3.34 -1.34 5.06 -0.89 2.42 -1.03 5.53 -0.64 0.12 -0.06 0.24 -0.05
2- 2 5.07 -0.09 4.48 -1.38 3.96 0.00 4.58 -0.95 0.19 0.00 0.18 -0.06
2- 3 6.52 -0.22 3.83 -1.98 5.53 -0.17 3.63 -1.46 0.28 -0.01 0.13 -0.07
2- 4 7.19 -0.62 3.13 -2.57 6.13 -0.69 2.75 -2.00 0.33 -0.04 0.09 -0.10
2- 5 7.13 -1.10 2.43 -3.27 5.86 -1.24 1.95 -2.79 0.33 -0.08 0.06 -0.13
2- 6 6.32 -1.60 1.76 -3.94 5.33 -1.80 1.21 -3.74 0.27 -0.11 0.03 -0.18
2- 7 4.93 -2.11 1.15 -4.55 3.71 -2.36 0.55 -4.70 0.16 -0.15 0.02 -0.23
2- 8 3.24 -2.62 0.64 -5.06 1.20 -2.91 0.05 -5.62 0.06 -0.27 0.01 -0.28
2- 9 1.62 -4.20 0.26 -5.44 0.00 -4.50 0.00 -6.47 0.01 -0.49 0.00 -0.34
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 7 of 24
2-10 0.00 -7.34 0.00 -5.60 0.00 -8.64 0.00 -6.96 0.00 -0.80 0.00 -0.41
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 1.80 -1.80 0.88 -0.88 2.16 -2.16 1.07 -1.07 0.14 -0.14 0.07 -0.07
3- 1 1.27 -1.27 0.88 -0.88 1.48 -1.48 1.07 -1.07 0.09 -0.09 0.07 -0.07
3- 2 0.74 -0.74 0.88 -0.88 0.80 -0.80 1.07 -1.07 0.05 -0.05 0.07 -0.07
3- 3 0.24 -0.24 0.88 -0.88 0.19 -0.19 1.07 -1.07 0.01 -0.01 0.07 -0.07
3- 4 0.54 -0.54 0.88 -0.88 0.57 -0.57 1.07 -1.07 0.04 -0.04 0.07 -0.07
3- 5 1.07 -1.07 0.88 -0.88 1.24 -1.24 1.07 -1.07 0.08 -0.08 0.07 -0.07
3- 6 1.61 -1.61 0.88 -0.88 1.92 -1.92 1.07 -1.07 0.12 -0.12 0.07 -0.07
3- 7 2.16 -2.16 0.88 -0.88 2.60 -2.60 1.07 -1.07 0.16 -0.16 0.07 -0.07
3- 8 2.71 -2.71 0.88 -0.88 3.27 -3.27 1.07 -1.07 0.21 -0.21 0.07 -0.07
3- 9 3.27 -3.27 0.88 -0.88 3.95 -3.95 1.07 -1.07 0.25 -0.25 0.07 -0.07
3-10 3.82 -3.82 0.88 -0.88 4.63 -4.63 1.07 -1.07 0.29 -0.29 0.07 -0.07
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 0.28 -1.59 2.24 0.00 0.22 -1.46 1.77 0.00 0.01 -0.13 0.25 0.00
4- 1 1.08 -0.44 1.67 0.00 1.24 -0.21 1.33 0.00 0.08 -0.02 0.19 0.00
4- 2 2.17 0.00 1.10 0.00 2.14 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.12 0.00
4- 3 2.83 0.00 0.53 0.00 2.66 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.05 0.00
4- 4 3.04 0.00 0.03 -0.22 2.79 0.00 0.03 -0.17 0.29 0.00 0.00 -0.01
4- 5 2.75 0.00 0.00 -0.79 2.54 0.00 0.00 -0.62 0.25 0.00 0.00 -0.08
4- 6 1.98 -0.10 0.00 -1.36 1.90 -0.07 0.00 -1.06 0.15 0.00 0.00 -0.15
4- 7 0.72 -0.85 0.00 -1.93 0.88 -1.01 0.00 -1.51 0.06 -0.06 0.00 -0.21
4- 8 0.00 -2.66 0.00 -2.50 0.00 -2.51 0.00 -1.96 0.00 -0.22 0.00 -0.28
4- 9 0.00 -5.02 0.00 -3.07 0.00 -4.40 0.00 -2.40 0.00 -0.49 0.00 -0.35
4-10 0.00 -7.87 0.00 -3.64 0.00 -6.67 0.00 -2.85 0.00 -0.82 0.00 -0.41
Right
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 8 of 24
Serviceability Check: Crack Control (Fill Depth = 0.00 ft)
--------------------
Bar Fss Spacing Allow
Mark Location (ksi) (in) (in)
A1 Top Corner Bar 3.94 10.00 87.35
A2 Bot Corner Bar 1.80 10.00 99.99
A100 Top Slab (int) 24.32 10.00 12.49
A300 Top Slab (ext) 15.66 10.00 18.45
A200 Bot Slab (int) 18.24 10.00 15.50
A400 Bot Slab (ext) 17.99 10.00 15.45
B1 Ext Wall (int) 7.32 12.00 41.50
B2 Ext Wall (ext) 0.00 12.00 0.00
B3 Int Wall 0.00 8.00 99.99

Strength Limit State at Critical Sections: Flexure (Fill Depth = 0.00 ft)
--------------------------------------------------
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 14.00 -3.02 12.70 14.17 15.56 0.90 0.53 11.60 6.11 7.92
MID 38.00 1.10 -0.37 5.65 5.00 0.90 0.20 11.60 5.30 6.87
MID- 38.00 -3.81 12.46 14.17 15.51 0.90 0.53 11.60 4.06 5.26
TOP 14.00 -6.51 12.70 14.17 15.56 0.90 0.53 11.60 2.47 3.21
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 13.00 -3.03 2.72 19.45 18.25 0.90 0.53 18.13 6.74 8.73
MID 52.00 13.60 -0.54 20.77 18.55 0.90 0.53 18.13 1.38 1.79
RT 13.00 -8.61 1.51 19.45 17.92 0.90 0.53 18.13 2.17 2.82
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 14.00 -1.69 17.87 8.40 11.64 0.90 0.30 11.60 6.88 8.91
MID 38.00 2.31 1.05 8.40 7.80 0.90 0.30 11.60 3.37 4.37
TOP 14.00 -6.29 17.40 8.40 11.54 0.90 0.30 11.60 1.83 2.38
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 13.00 -2.05 3.26 19.45 18.40 0.90 0.53 18.13 12.78 16.56
MID 52.00 6.61 -0.21 13.96 12.50 0.90 0.37 18.13 2.01 2.61
RT 13.00 -9.75 1.83 19.45 18.01 0.90 0.53 18.13 1.97 2.56
Note: Mu - Resisting moment under pure flexure, Ma - Allowable moment under applied axial load
Strength Limit State at Critical Sections: Vertical Shear (Fill Depth = 0.00 ft)
---------------------------------------------------------
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 19.76 1.91 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.66 8.63
MID 38.00 0.90 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.83 14.04
MID- 38.00 0.90 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.29 10.75
TOP 19.76 -2.03 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.65 7.32
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 20.20 8.99 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.39 1.80
MID 52.00 4.51 7.87 13.15 14.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.89 3.75
RT 20.20 10.92 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 1.47
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 9 of 24
Thickness = 8.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 19.76 1.99 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.84 6.28
MID 38.00 1.99 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.84 6.28
TOP 19.76 1.99 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.84 6.28
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 20.20 3.08 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.89 6.33
MID 52.00 0.19 7.51 12.55 13.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.22 87.14
RT 20.20 5.85 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.31 3.00
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 10 of 24
Load Combination Results at Tenth Points: (k, k-ft)(Fill Depth = 0.00 ft)
----------------------------------------
M-PT +Moment -Moment +Axial -Axial +Shear -Shear
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 -0.863 -5.714 -0.602 12.697 3.262 -0.212
1- 1 -0.840 -3.872 -0.602 12.697 2.712 -0.445
1- 2 -0.225 -2.862 0.694 12.462 2.197 -0.656
1- 3 0.437 -3.031 0.694 12.462 1.716 -0.843
1- 4 0.806 -3.311 0.694 12.462 1.271 -1.007
1- 5 1.103 -3.806 -0.367 12.462 0.895 -1.185
1- 6 1.438 -4.561 -0.367 12.462 0.777 -1.561
1- 7 1.567 -5.388 -0.367 12.462 0.682 -1.904
1- 8 1.522 -6.272 -0.367 12.462 0.610 -2.211
1- 9 1.884 -7.756 -0.602 12.697 0.561 -2.484
1-10 2.227 -9.405 -0.602 12.697 0.535 -2.722
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 2.227 -9.405 -0.535 2.722 12.054 -0.602
2- 1 5.822 -3.735 -0.535 2.722 10.782 -1.177
2- 2 9.313 -0.899 -0.535 2.722 8.883 -2.182
2- 3 12.239 -0.712 -0.535 2.722 7.357 -3.414
2- 4 13.597 -1.281 -0.535 2.722 5.932 -4.611
2- 5 13.476 -2.121 -0.535 2.722 4.510 -6.036
2- 6 11.832 -3.083 -0.535 2.722 3.153 -7.424
2- 7 9.119 -4.336 0.678 1.509 1.921 -8.966
2- 8 5.828 -5.876 0.678 1.509 0.875 -10.820
2- 9 2.639 -9.523 0.678 1.509 0.067 -12.543
2-10 -0.126 -17.919 1.587 1.509 -0.281 -13.647
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 4.011 -4.011 1.047 17.867 1.989 -1.989
3- 1 2.751 -2.751 1.047 17.867 1.989 -1.989
3- 2 1.495 -1.495 1.047 17.867 1.989 -1.989
3- 3 0.440 -0.440 1.047 17.867 1.989 -1.989
3- 4 1.060 -1.060 1.047 17.867 1.989 -1.989
3- 5 2.314 -2.314 1.047 17.867 1.989 -1.989
3- 6 3.573 -3.573 1.517 17.397 1.989 -1.989
3- 7 4.832 -4.832 1.517 17.397 1.989 -1.989
3- 8 6.092 -6.092 1.517 17.397 1.989 -1.989
3- 9 7.352 -7.352 1.517 17.397 1.989 -1.989
3-10 8.611 -8.611 1.517 17.397 1.989 -1.989
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 -0.863 -5.714 -0.212 3.262 5.736 1.101
4- 1 1.814 -2.421 -0.212 3.262 4.368 0.876
4- 2 4.303 -0.925 -0.212 2.353 3.000 0.622
4- 3 6.010 -0.368 -0.212 2.353 1.632 0.368
4- 4 6.614 0.032 -0.212 2.353 0.426 -0.297
4- 5 6.032 0.272 -0.212 2.353 0.186 -1.664
4- 6 4.270 0.332 -0.212 3.262 0.003 -3.032
4- 7 1.912 -1.792 1.218 1.832 -0.180 -4.400
4- 8 0.042 -5.627 2.353 1.832 -0.363 -5.768
4- 9 -0.352 -11.122 2.353 1.832 -0.546 -7.137
4-10 -0.904 -17.802 2.353 1.832 -0.729 -8.505
Right
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 11 of 24
ANALYSIS RESULTS (Fill Depth = 1.00 ft)
================
Edge beams or shear connection to adjacent slab not required (LRFD 4.6.2.10.4)
Load Parameters:
---------------
Fe = 1.01
Unfactored Moments due to All Loads: (k-ft) (Fill Depth = 1.00 ft)
-----------------------------------
M-PT Mdc Mev Mdw Meh Mls Mwa Mll+ Mll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 -0.53 -0.20 0.00 -0.96 -0.57 0.00 0.28 -1.66
1- 1 -0.49 -0.20 0.00 -0.33 -0.24 0.00 0.00 -1.37
1- 2 -0.44 -0.20 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00 -1.32
1- 3 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00 -1.56
1- 4 -0.35 -0.21 0.00 0.54 0.30 0.00 0.00 -1.80
1- 5 -0.31 -0.21 0.00 0.55 0.34 0.00 0.17 -2.10
1- 6 -0.26 -0.21 0.00 0.44 0.31 0.00 0.43 -2.50
1- 7 -0.22 -0.21 0.00 0.23 0.20 0.00 0.70 -2.90
1- 8 -0.17 -0.22 0.00 -0.06 0.02 0.00 0.99 -3.30
1- 9 -0.13 -0.22 0.00 -0.42 -0.23 0.00 1.30 -3.71
1-10 -0.08 -0.22 0.00 -0.83 -0.56 0.00 1.60 -4.11
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 -0.08 -0.22 0.00 -0.83 -0.56 0.00 1.60 -4.11
2- 1 0.21 0.08 0.00 -0.70 -0.47 0.00 3.34 -1.35
2- 2 0.41 0.30 0.00 -0.56 -0.38 0.00 5.08 -0.09
2- 3 0.51 0.42 0.00 -0.43 -0.29 0.00 6.57 -0.22
2- 4 0.52 0.45 0.00 -0.29 -0.20 0.00 7.26 -0.70
2- 5 0.43 0.39 0.00 -0.16 -0.11 0.00 7.20 -1.27
2- 6 0.26 0.24 0.00 -0.03 -0.02 0.00 6.36 -1.84
2- 7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.07 0.00 4.92 -2.42
2- 8 -0.38 -0.33 0.00 0.24 0.16 0.00 3.19 -3.06
2- 9 -0.84 -0.75 0.00 0.37 0.25 0.00 1.58 -4.80
2-10 -1.39 -1.27 0.00 0.51 0.34 0.00 0.00 -9.10
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 -2.21
3- 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 -1.52
3- 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 -0.82
3- 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 -0.24
3- 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 -0.58
3- 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28 -1.28
3- 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 -1.97
3- 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.66 -2.66
3- 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.36 -3.36
3- 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.05 -4.05
3-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.75 -4.75
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 -0.53 -0.20 0.00 -0.96 -0.57 0.00 0.28 -1.66
4- 1 0.07 0.10 0.00 -0.81 -0.47 0.00 1.27 -0.44
4- 2 0.50 0.31 0.00 -0.65 -0.38 0.00 2.28 0.00
4- 3 0.75 0.43 0.00 -0.49 -0.29 0.00 2.99 0.00
4- 4 0.83 0.46 0.00 -0.34 -0.20 0.00 3.20 0.00
4- 5 0.73 0.39 0.00 -0.18 -0.11 0.00 2.89 0.00
4- 6 0.45 0.24 0.00 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 2.05 -0.10
4- 7 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.90 -1.04
4- 8 -0.63 -0.35 0.00 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.00 -2.78
4- 9 -1.44 -0.78 0.00 0.44 0.26 0.00 0.00 -5.31
4-10 -2.42 -1.30 0.00 0.60 0.35 0.00 0.00 -8.37
Right
Unfactored Shears due to All Loads: (k-ft) (Fill Depth = 1.00 ft)
----------------------------------
M-PT Vdc Vev Vdw Veh Vls Vwa Vll+ Vll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 12 of 24
Bottom
1- 0 0.07 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.57 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 1 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.46 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 2 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.34 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 3 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.23 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 4 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.12 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 5 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.09 0.00 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 6 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.25 -0.11 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 7 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.40 -0.23 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 8 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.52 -0.34 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1- 9 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.61 -0.45 0.00 0.49 -0.64
1-10 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.68 -0.57 0.00 0.49 -0.64
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 0.39 0.41 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 6.19 -0.66
2- 1 0.28 0.30 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 5.57 -0.90
2- 2 0.17 0.20 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 4.60 -1.38
2- 3 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 3.83 -1.99
2- 4 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 3.12 -2.58
2- 5 -0.15 -0.12 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 2.41 -3.29
2- 6 -0.26 -0.23 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 1.73 -3.98
2- 7 -0.37 -0.33 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 1.13 -4.75
2- 8 -0.48 -0.44 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 0.62 -5.70
2- 9 -0.58 -0.54 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 0.25 -6.58
2-10 -0.69 -0.65 0.00 0.15 0.10 0.00 0.00 -7.11
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3- 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
3-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 -1.10
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 0.80 0.40 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 2.39 0.00
4- 1 0.60 0.29 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 1.78 0.00
4- 2 0.39 0.19 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 1.17 0.00
4- 3 0.19 0.08 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 0.56 0.00
4- 4 -0.01 -0.02 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 0.03 -0.23
4- 5 -0.22 -0.13 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 0.00 -0.84
4- 6 -0.42 -0.23 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 0.00 -1.45
4- 7 -0.62 -0.34 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 0.00 -2.06
4- 8 -0.83 -0.44 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 0.00 -2.67
4- 9 -1.03 -0.55 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 0.00 -3.29
4-10 -1.23 -0.65 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.00 0.00 -3.90
Right
Live Load Parameters: Traffic Direction is Parallel to Main Reinforcement
--------------------
Vehicle Axle Weight Dist. From
No. (k) Previous (ft)
Truck 1 5.52 0.00 (largest truck used)
2 5.52 14.00
3 1.38 14.00
Tandem 1 4.32 0.00 (largest truck used)
2 4.32 4.00
All Vehicles:
Distribution Width: 4.48 ft
Impact Factor : 1.29
Note: Distribution width is calculated for one wheel only.
Lane:
Lane Load : 0.069 k/ft Distribution Width: 11.15 ft
Truck Positions That Cause Maximum Results:
-------------------------------------------
Maximum +Moment in Top Slab
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 13 of 24
Vehicle Axle Weight Dist. From
No. (k) Left End (ft)
Truck 1 1.38 17.47
2 5.52 3.47
3 5.52 -10.53
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.32 k/ft
Maximum -Moment in Top Slab
Truck 1 1.38 19.20
2 5.52 5.20
3 5.52 -8.80
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.32 k/ft
Maximum +Shear in Top Slab
Truck 1 5.52 0.43
2 5.52 -13.57
3 1.38 -27.57
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.32 k/ft
Maximum -Shear in Top Slab
Truck 1 1.38 22.23
2 5.52 8.23
3 5.52 -5.77
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.32 k/ft
Maximum +Moment in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.32 7.47
2 4.32 3.47
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.50 k/ft
Maximum -Moment in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.32 6.60
2 4.32 2.60
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.50 k/ft
Maximum +Shear in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.32 4.33
2 4.32 0.33
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.50 k/ft
Maximum -Shear in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.32 8.33
2 4.32 4.33
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.50 k/ft
Maximum Deflection in Top Slab Due to Lane Load = 0.000 in
Unfactored Moments and Shears due to Live Loads: (k, k-ft) (Fill Depth = 1.00 ft)
-----------------------------------------------
Truck Tandem Lane
M-PT Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll- Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll- Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 0.27 -1.54 0.44 -0.61 0.21 -1.41 0.46 -0.61 0.01 -0.12 0.03 -0.03
1- 1 0.00 -1.26 0.44 -0.61 0.00 -1.15 0.46 -0.61 0.00 -0.11 0.03 -0.03
1- 2 0.00 -1.21 0.44 -0.61 0.00 -0.97 0.46 -0.61 0.00 -0.11 0.03 -0.03
1- 3 0.00 -1.44 0.44 -0.61 0.00 -1.21 0.46 -0.61 0.00 -0.12 0.03 -0.03
1- 4 0.00 -1.68 0.44 -0.61 0.00 -1.59 0.46 -0.61 0.00 -0.12 0.03 -0.03
1- 5 0.16 -1.91 0.44 -0.61 0.10 -1.97 0.46 -0.61 0.01 -0.13 0.03 -0.03
1- 6 0.41 -2.15 0.44 -0.61 0.36 -2.36 0.46 -0.61 0.02 -0.14 0.03 -0.03
1- 7 0.67 -2.41 0.44 -0.61 0.65 -2.74 0.46 -0.61 0.04 -0.16 0.03 -0.03
1- 8 0.93 -2.80 0.44 -0.61 0.94 -3.13 0.46 -0.61 0.06 -0.18 0.03 -0.03
1- 9 1.20 -3.18 0.44 -0.61 1.22 -3.51 0.46 -0.61 0.07 -0.20 0.03 -0.03
1-10 1.46 -3.56 0.44 -0.61 1.51 -3.89 0.46 -0.61 0.09 -0.22 0.03 -0.03
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 1.46 -3.56 5.17 -0.57 1.51 -3.89 5.93 -0.62 0.09 -0.22 0.27 -0.04
2- 1 3.23 -1.29 4.91 -0.86 2.34 -0.99 5.36 -0.62 0.11 -0.06 0.21 -0.04
2- 2 4.91 -0.09 4.35 -1.33 3.83 0.00 4.43 -0.92 0.17 0.00 0.16 -0.05
2- 3 6.32 -0.21 3.71 -1.92 5.36 -0.16 3.52 -1.42 0.25 -0.01 0.12 -0.07
2- 4 6.97 -0.60 3.04 -2.49 5.94 -0.67 2.67 -1.94 0.29 -0.04 0.08 -0.09
2- 5 6.91 -1.07 2.36 -3.17 5.68 -1.20 1.89 -2.70 0.29 -0.07 0.05 -0.12
2- 6 6.13 -1.55 1.70 -3.82 5.16 -1.74 1.17 -3.63 0.24 -0.10 0.03 -0.16
2- 7 4.78 -2.05 1.11 -4.41 3.59 -2.28 0.53 -4.55 0.14 -0.14 0.01 -0.20
2- 8 3.14 -2.54 0.62 -4.91 1.16 -2.82 0.05 -5.45 0.05 -0.24 0.01 -0.25
2- 9 1.57 -4.07 0.25 -5.27 0.00 -4.36 0.00 -6.27 0.01 -0.44 0.00 -0.31
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 14 of 24
2-10 0.00 -7.12 0.00 -5.43 0.00 -8.38 0.00 -6.74 0.00 -0.72 0.00 -0.37
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 1.75 -1.75 0.86 -0.86 2.09 -2.09 1.04 -1.04 0.12 -0.12 0.06 -0.06
3- 1 1.23 -1.23 0.86 -0.86 1.43 -1.43 1.04 -1.04 0.08 -0.08 0.06 -0.06
3- 2 0.72 -0.72 0.86 -0.86 0.78 -0.78 1.04 -1.04 0.04 -0.04 0.06 -0.06
3- 3 0.23 -0.23 0.86 -0.86 0.18 -0.18 1.04 -1.04 0.01 -0.01 0.06 -0.06
3- 4 0.53 -0.53 0.86 -0.86 0.55 -0.55 1.04 -1.04 0.03 -0.03 0.06 -0.06
3- 5 1.03 -1.03 0.86 -0.86 1.21 -1.21 1.04 -1.04 0.07 -0.07 0.06 -0.06
3- 6 1.56 -1.56 0.86 -0.86 1.86 -1.86 1.04 -1.04 0.11 -0.11 0.06 -0.06
3- 7 2.09 -2.09 0.86 -0.86 2.52 -2.52 1.04 -1.04 0.15 -0.15 0.06 -0.06
3- 8 2.63 -2.63 0.86 -0.86 3.17 -3.17 1.04 -1.04 0.19 -0.19 0.06 -0.06
3- 9 3.17 -3.17 0.86 -0.86 3.83 -3.83 1.04 -1.04 0.22 -0.22 0.06 -0.06
3-10 3.70 -3.70 0.86 -0.86 4.49 -4.49 1.04 -1.04 0.26 -0.26 0.06 -0.06
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 0.27 -1.54 2.17 0.00 0.21 -1.41 1.72 0.00 0.01 -0.12 0.23 0.00
4- 1 1.04 -0.43 1.61 0.00 1.20 -0.20 1.29 0.00 0.08 -0.02 0.17 0.00
4- 2 2.11 0.00 1.06 0.00 2.07 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.11 0.00
4- 3 2.74 0.00 0.51 0.00 2.58 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.05 0.00
4- 4 2.95 0.00 0.03 -0.21 2.71 0.00 0.03 -0.17 0.26 0.00 0.00 -0.01
4- 5 2.67 0.00 0.00 -0.77 2.46 0.00 0.00 -0.60 0.22 0.00 0.00 -0.07
4- 6 1.91 -0.10 0.00 -1.32 1.84 -0.07 0.00 -1.03 0.14 0.00 0.00 -0.13
4- 7 0.69 -0.83 0.00 -1.87 0.85 -0.98 0.00 -1.46 0.05 -0.06 0.00 -0.19
4- 8 0.00 -2.58 0.00 -2.42 0.00 -2.44 0.00 -1.89 0.00 -0.20 0.00 -0.25
4- 9 0.00 -4.87 0.00 -2.97 0.00 -4.26 0.00 -2.33 0.00 -0.44 0.00 -0.31
4-10 0.00 -7.63 0.00 -3.53 0.00 -6.46 0.00 -2.76 0.00 -0.74 0.00 -0.37
Right
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 15 of 24
Serviceability Check: Crack Control (Fill Depth = 1.00 ft)
--------------------
Bar Fss Spacing Allow
Mark Location (ksi) (in) (in)
A1 Top Corner Bar 3.69 10.00 93.81
A2 Bot Corner Bar 1.59 10.00 99.99
A100 Top Slab (int) 24.69 10.00 12.24
A300 Top Slab (ext) 16.98 10.00 16.64
A200 Bot Slab (int) 19.40 10.00 14.30
A400 Bot Slab (ext) 19.36 10.00 14.01
B1 Ext Wall (int) 4.70 12.00 67.11
B2 Ext Wall (ext) 0.00 12.00 0.00
B3 Int Wall 0.00 8.00 99.99

Strength Limit State at Critical Sections: Flexure (Fill Depth = 1.00 ft)
--------------------------------------------------
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 14.00 -3.21 12.86 14.17 15.60 0.90 0.53 11.60 6.24 8.09
MID 38.00 0.97 0.25 5.65 5.14 0.90 0.20 11.60 5.66 7.33
MID- 38.00 -3.84 12.61 14.17 15.54 0.90 0.53 11.60 4.17 5.41
TOP 14.00 -6.59 12.86 14.17 15.60 0.90 0.53 11.60 2.52 3.27
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 13.00 -3.01 2.94 19.45 18.31 0.90 0.53 18.13 6.92 8.97
MID 52.00 13.68 -0.33 20.77 18.60 0.90 0.53 18.13 1.39 1.80
RT 13.00 -9.08 1.64 19.45 17.95 0.90 0.53 18.13 2.16 2.80
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 14.00 -1.63 18.87 8.40 11.87 0.90 0.30 11.60 7.27 9.42
MID 38.00 2.23 2.63 8.40 8.17 0.90 0.30 11.60 3.66 4.74
TOP 14.00 -6.07 18.37 8.40 11.76 0.90 0.30 11.60 1.94 2.51
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 13.00 -2.06 3.48 19.45 18.46 0.90 0.53 18.13 13.01 16.87
MID 52.00 6.93 -0.01 13.96 12.56 0.90 0.37 18.13 2.00 2.60
RT 13.00 -10.23 1.97 19.45 18.04 0.90 0.53 18.13 1.95 2.53
Note: Mu - Resisting moment under pure flexure, Ma - Allowable moment under applied axial load
Strength Limit State at Critical Sections: Vertical Shear (Fill Depth = 1.00 ft)
---------------------------------------------------------
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 19.76 2.00 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.73 8.72
MID 38.00 0.86 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.23 14.56
MID- 38.00 0.86 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.59 11.14
TOP 19.76 -2.11 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.71 7.40
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 20.20 9.02 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.81
MID 52.00 4.26 7.87 13.15 14.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.96 3.84
RT 20.20 11.10 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.12 1.45
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 16 of 24
Thickness = 8.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 19.76 1.92 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.02 6.51
MID 38.00 1.92 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.02 6.51
TOP 19.76 1.92 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.02 6.51
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 20.20 3.30 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.93 6.39
MID 52.00 0.12 7.51 12.55 13.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.59 86.32
RT 20.20 6.21 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.29 2.97
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 17 of 24
Load Combination Results at Tenth Points: (k, k-ft)(Fill Depth = 1.00 ft)
----------------------------------------
M-PT +Moment -Moment +Axial -Axial +Shear -Shear
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 -1.305 -6.114 -0.001 12.864 3.482 -0.005
1- 1 -1.171 -4.145 -0.001 12.864 2.881 -0.273
1- 2 -0.400 -3.029 1.105 12.614 2.314 -0.517
1- 3 0.341 -3.134 1.105 12.614 1.783 -0.739
1- 4 0.756 -3.371 1.105 12.614 1.285 -0.938
1- 5 0.974 -3.841 0.249 12.614 0.859 -1.149
1- 6 1.273 -4.585 0.249 12.614 0.706 -1.577
1- 7 1.332 -5.422 0.249 12.614 0.577 -1.970
1- 8 1.184 -6.338 0.249 12.614 0.471 -2.329
1- 9 1.445 -7.910 -0.001 12.864 0.388 -2.653
1-10 1.668 -9.682 -0.001 12.864 0.328 -2.942
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 1.668 -9.682 -0.328 2.942 12.242 -0.001
2- 1 5.587 -3.753 -0.328 2.942 10.876 -0.699
2- 2 9.278 -0.784 -0.328 1.846 8.902 -1.813
2- 3 12.296 -0.280 -0.328 2.942 7.289 -3.145
2- 4 13.678 -0.736 -0.328 2.942 5.772 -4.443
2- 5 13.511 -1.575 -0.328 2.942 4.258 -5.960
2- 6 11.753 -2.655 -0.328 2.942 2.805 -7.441
2- 7 8.860 -4.155 0.971 1.644 1.473 -9.070
2- 8 5.287 -6.049 0.971 1.644 0.319 -11.000
2- 9 1.684 -10.093 0.971 1.644 -0.605 -12.802
2-10 -1.113 -18.849 1.846 1.644 -0.816 -14.004
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 3.869 -3.869 2.634 18.874 1.919 -1.919
3- 1 2.654 -2.654 2.634 18.874 1.919 -1.919
3- 2 1.442 -1.442 2.634 18.874 1.919 -1.919
3- 3 0.424 -0.424 2.634 18.874 1.919 -1.919
3- 4 1.023 -1.023 2.634 18.874 1.919 -1.919
3- 5 2.232 -2.232 2.634 18.874 1.919 -1.919
3- 6 3.447 -3.447 3.135 18.373 1.919 -1.919
3- 7 4.662 -4.662 3.135 18.373 1.919 -1.919
3- 8 5.877 -5.877 3.135 18.373 1.919 -1.919
3- 9 7.092 -7.092 3.135 18.373 1.919 -1.919
3-10 8.307 -8.307 3.135 18.373 1.919 -1.919
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 -1.305 -6.114 -0.005 3.482 6.135 1.507
4- 1 1.724 -2.473 -0.005 3.482 4.673 1.230
4- 2 4.441 -0.817 -0.005 2.607 3.211 0.898
4- 3 6.279 -0.112 -0.005 2.607 1.750 0.507
4- 4 6.930 0.353 -0.005 2.607 0.443 -0.279
4- 5 6.315 0.576 -0.005 2.607 0.119 -1.740
4- 6 4.437 0.559 -0.005 2.607 -0.158 -3.202
4- 7 1.874 -1.717 1.511 1.966 -0.436 -4.664
4- 8 -0.196 -5.847 2.607 1.966 -0.714 -6.126
4- 9 -0.935 -11.694 2.607 1.966 -0.991 -7.588
4-10 -1.915 -18.809 2.607 1.966 -1.269 -9.050
Right
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 18 of 24
ANALYSIS RESULTS (Fill Depth = 1.99 ft)
================
Edge beams or shear connection to adjacent slab not required (LRFD 4.6.2.10.4)
Load Parameters:
---------------
Fe = 1.02
Unfactored Moments due to All Loads: (k-ft) (Fill Depth = 1.99 ft)
-----------------------------------
M-PT Mdc Mev Mdw Meh Mls Mwa Mll+ Mll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 -0.53 -0.40 0.00 -1.15 -0.57 0.00 0.27 -1.60
1- 1 -0.49 -0.40 0.00 -0.41 -0.24 0.00 0.00 -1.32
1- 2 -0.44 -0.41 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00 -1.27
1- 3 -0.40 -0.41 0.00 0.47 0.20 0.00 0.00 -1.50
1- 4 -0.35 -0.42 0.00 0.64 0.30 0.00 0.00 -1.73
1- 5 -0.31 -0.42 0.00 0.66 0.34 0.00 0.16 -2.02
1- 6 -0.26 -0.43 0.00 0.54 0.31 0.00 0.42 -2.41
1- 7 -0.22 -0.43 0.00 0.29 0.20 0.00 0.68 -2.80
1- 8 -0.17 -0.44 0.00 -0.06 0.02 0.00 0.96 -3.19
1- 9 -0.13 -0.44 0.00 -0.50 -0.23 0.00 1.25 -3.58
1-10 -0.08 -0.45 0.00 -1.01 -0.56 0.00 1.55 -3.97
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 -0.08 -0.45 0.00 -1.01 -0.56 0.00 1.55 -3.97
2- 1 0.21 0.17 0.00 -0.85 -0.47 0.00 3.23 -1.31
2- 2 0.41 0.60 0.00 -0.69 -0.38 0.00 4.91 -0.08
2- 3 0.51 0.85 0.00 -0.52 -0.29 0.00 6.35 -0.21
2- 4 0.52 0.91 0.00 -0.36 -0.20 0.00 7.01 -0.68
2- 5 0.43 0.79 0.00 -0.20 -0.11 0.00 6.95 -1.23
2- 6 0.26 0.49 0.00 -0.03 -0.02 0.00 6.15 -1.78
2- 7 -0.02 0.01 0.00 0.13 0.07 0.00 4.75 -2.34
2- 8 -0.38 -0.66 0.00 0.29 0.16 0.00 3.09 -2.95
2- 9 -0.84 -1.51 0.00 0.46 0.25 0.00 1.53 -4.62
2-10 -1.39 -2.55 0.00 0.62 0.34 0.00 0.00 -8.76
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.13 -2.13
3- 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.46 -1.46
3- 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 -0.80
3- 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 -0.23
3- 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 -0.56
3- 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.23 -1.23
3- 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 -1.90
3- 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.57 -2.57
3- 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.24 -3.24
3- 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.91 -3.91
3-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.58 -4.58
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 -0.53 -0.40 0.00 -1.15 -0.57 0.00 0.27 -1.60
4- 1 0.07 0.21 0.00 -0.96 -0.47 0.00 1.23 -0.43
4- 2 0.50 0.63 0.00 -0.78 -0.38 0.00 2.20 0.00
4- 3 0.75 0.86 0.00 -0.59 -0.29 0.00 2.88 0.00
4- 4 0.83 0.92 0.00 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 3.09 0.00
4- 5 0.73 0.79 0.00 -0.22 -0.11 0.00 2.79 0.00
4- 6 0.45 0.47 0.00 -0.03 -0.01 0.00 1.98 -0.10
4- 7 0.00 -0.02 0.00 0.16 0.08 0.00 0.87 -1.00
4- 8 -0.63 -0.70 0.00 0.34 0.17 0.00 0.00 -2.68
4- 9 -1.44 -1.57 0.00 0.53 0.26 0.00 0.00 -5.11
4-10 -2.42 -2.61 0.00 0.72 0.35 0.00 0.00 -8.06
Right
Unfactored Shears due to All Loads: (k-ft) (Fill Depth = 1.99 ft)
----------------------------------
M-PT Vdc Vev Vdw Veh Vls Vwa Vll+ Vll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 19 of 24
Bottom
1- 0 0.07 -0.01 0.00 1.33 0.57 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 1 0.07 -0.01 0.00 1.00 0.46 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 2 0.07 -0.01 0.00 0.69 0.34 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 3 0.07 -0.01 0.00 0.41 0.23 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 4 0.07 -0.01 0.00 0.15 0.12 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 5 0.07 -0.01 0.00 -0.09 0.00 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 6 0.07 -0.01 0.00 -0.29 -0.11 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 7 0.07 -0.01 0.00 -0.47 -0.23 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 8 0.07 -0.01 0.00 -0.63 -0.34 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1- 9 0.07 -0.01 0.00 -0.76 -0.45 0.00 0.47 -0.62
1-10 0.07 -0.01 0.00 -0.86 -0.57 0.00 0.47 -0.62
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 0.39 0.82 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 5.98 -0.64
2- 1 0.28 0.60 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 5.38 -0.87
2- 2 0.17 0.39 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 4.44 -1.34
2- 3 0.07 0.18 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 3.70 -1.92
2- 4 -0.04 -0.03 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 3.01 -2.49
2- 5 -0.15 -0.24 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 2.33 -3.18
2- 6 -0.26 -0.45 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 1.68 -3.84
2- 7 -0.37 -0.67 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 1.09 -4.59
2- 8 -0.48 -0.88 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 0.60 -5.50
2- 9 -0.58 -1.09 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 0.24 -6.35
2-10 -0.69 -1.30 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.00 0.00 -6.86
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3- 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
3-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 -1.06
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 2.30 0.00
4- 1 0.60 0.59 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 1.71 0.00
4- 2 0.39 0.38 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 1.13 0.00
4- 3 0.19 0.17 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.54 0.00
4- 4 -0.01 -0.04 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.03 -0.22
4- 5 -0.22 -0.26 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.00 -0.81
4- 6 -0.42 -0.47 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.00 -1.40
4- 7 -0.62 -0.68 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.00 -1.98
4- 8 -0.83 -0.89 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.00 -2.57
4- 9 -1.03 -1.10 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.00 -3.16
4-10 -1.23 -1.31 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.00 -3.75
Right
Live Load Parameters: Traffic Direction is Parallel to Main Reinforcement
--------------------
Vehicle Axle Weight Dist. From
No. (k) Previous (ft)
Truck 1 5.35 0.00 (largest truck used)
2 5.35 14.00
3 1.34 14.00
Tandem 1 4.18 0.00 (largest truck used)
2 4.18 4.00
All Vehicles:
Distribution Width: 4.48 ft
Impact Factor : 1.25
Note: Distribution width is calculated for one wheel only.
Lane:
Lane Load : 0.062 k/ft Distribution Width: 12.29 ft
Truck Positions That Cause Maximum Results:
-------------------------------------------
Maximum +Moment in Top Slab
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 20 of 24
Vehicle Axle Weight Dist. From
No. (k) Left End (ft)
Truck 1 1.34 17.47
2 5.35 3.47
3 5.35 -10.53
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.31 k/ft
Maximum -Moment in Top Slab
Truck 1 1.34 19.20
2 5.35 5.20
3 5.35 -8.80
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.31 k/ft
Maximum +Shear in Top Slab
Truck 1 5.35 0.43
2 5.35 -13.57
3 1.34 -27.57
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.31 k/ft
Maximum -Shear in Top Slab
Truck 1 1.34 22.23
2 5.35 8.23
3 5.35 -5.77
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.31 k/ft
Maximum +Moment in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.18 7.47
2 4.18 3.47
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.48 k/ft
Maximum -Moment in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.18 6.60
2 4.18 2.60
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.48 k/ft
Maximum +Shear in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.18 4.33
2 4.18 0.33
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.48 k/ft
Maximum -Shear in Top Slab
Tandem 1 4.18 8.33
2 4.18 4.33
Coincident Bottom Slab Load: 0.48 k/ft
Maximum Deflection in Top Slab Due to Lane Load = 0.000 in
Unfactored Moments and Shears due to Live Loads: (k, k-ft) (Fill Depth = 1.99 ft)
-----------------------------------------------
Truck Tandem Lane
M-PT Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll- Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll- Mll+ Mll- Vll+ Vll-
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 0.26 -1.49 0.42 -0.59 0.20 -1.37 0.44 -0.59 0.01 -0.11 0.03 -0.03
1- 1 0.00 -1.22 0.42 -0.59 0.00 -1.11 0.44 -0.59 0.00 -0.10 0.03 -0.03
1- 2 0.00 -1.17 0.42 -0.59 0.00 -0.94 0.44 -0.59 0.00 -0.10 0.03 -0.03
1- 3 0.00 -1.40 0.42 -0.59 0.00 -1.17 0.44 -0.59 0.00 -0.11 0.03 -0.03
1- 4 0.00 -1.63 0.42 -0.59 0.00 -1.54 0.44 -0.59 0.00 -0.11 0.03 -0.03
1- 5 0.16 -1.85 0.42 -0.59 0.10 -1.91 0.44 -0.59 0.01 -0.11 0.03 -0.03
1- 6 0.40 -2.08 0.42 -0.59 0.35 -2.28 0.44 -0.59 0.02 -0.13 0.03 -0.03
1- 7 0.64 -2.34 0.42 -0.59 0.63 -2.65 0.44 -0.59 0.03 -0.14 0.03 -0.03
1- 8 0.90 -2.71 0.42 -0.59 0.91 -3.03 0.44 -0.59 0.05 -0.16 0.03 -0.03
1- 9 1.16 -3.08 0.42 -0.59 1.18 -3.40 0.44 -0.59 0.07 -0.18 0.03 -0.03
1-10 1.42 -3.45 0.42 -0.59 1.46 -3.77 0.44 -0.59 0.08 -0.20 0.03 -0.03
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 1.42 -3.45 5.01 -0.55 1.46 -3.77 5.74 -0.60 0.08 -0.20 0.24 -0.03
2- 1 3.13 -1.25 4.75 -0.84 2.27 -0.96 5.19 -0.60 0.10 -0.05 0.19 -0.04
2- 2 4.75 -0.08 4.21 -1.29 3.71 0.00 4.29 -0.89 0.15 0.00 0.15 -0.05
2- 3 6.12 -0.20 3.59 -1.86 5.19 -0.16 3.41 -1.37 0.22 -0.01 0.11 -0.06
2- 4 6.74 -0.58 2.94 -2.41 5.75 -0.65 2.58 -1.88 0.27 -0.03 0.07 -0.08
2- 5 6.69 -1.03 2.28 -3.07 5.50 -1.17 1.83 -2.62 0.27 -0.06 0.05 -0.11
2- 6 5.93 -1.50 1.65 -3.70 5.00 -1.69 1.13 -3.51 0.22 -0.09 0.03 -0.14
2- 7 4.63 -1.98 1.08 -4.27 3.48 -2.21 0.52 -4.41 0.13 -0.13 0.01 -0.18
2- 8 3.04 -2.46 0.60 -4.75 1.12 -2.73 0.05 -5.28 0.05 -0.22 0.01 -0.23
2- 9 1.52 -3.94 0.24 -5.11 0.00 -4.22 0.00 -6.07 0.01 -0.40 0.00 -0.28
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 21 of 24
2-10 0.00 -6.89 0.00 -5.25 0.00 -8.11 0.00 -6.53 0.00 -0.65 0.00 -0.33
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 1.69 -1.69 0.83 -0.83 2.02 -2.02 1.00 -1.00 0.11 -0.11 0.05 -0.05
3- 1 1.19 -1.19 0.83 -0.83 1.39 -1.39 1.00 -1.00 0.08 -0.08 0.05 -0.05
3- 2 0.69 -0.69 0.83 -0.83 0.75 -0.75 1.00 -1.00 0.04 -0.04 0.05 -0.05
3- 3 0.22 -0.22 0.83 -0.83 0.17 -0.17 1.00 -1.00 0.01 -0.01 0.05 -0.05
3- 4 0.51 -0.51 0.83 -0.83 0.54 -0.54 1.00 -1.00 0.03 -0.03 0.05 -0.05
3- 5 1.00 -1.00 0.83 -0.83 1.17 -1.17 1.00 -1.00 0.06 -0.06 0.05 -0.05
3- 6 1.51 -1.51 0.83 -0.83 1.80 -1.80 1.00 -1.00 0.10 -0.10 0.05 -0.05
3- 7 2.03 -2.03 0.83 -0.83 2.44 -2.44 1.00 -1.00 0.13 -0.13 0.05 -0.05
3- 8 2.55 -2.55 0.83 -0.83 3.07 -3.07 1.00 -1.00 0.17 -0.17 0.05 -0.05
3- 9 3.07 -3.07 0.83 -0.83 3.71 -3.71 1.00 -1.00 0.20 -0.20 0.05 -0.05
3-10 3.59 -3.59 0.83 -0.83 4.34 -4.34 1.00 -1.00 0.24 -0.24 0.05 -0.05
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 0.26 -1.49 2.10 0.00 0.20 -1.37 1.66 0.00 0.01 -0.11 0.21 0.00
4- 1 1.01 -0.41 1.56 0.00 1.16 -0.20 1.24 0.00 0.07 -0.02 0.15 0.00
4- 2 2.04 0.00 1.03 0.00 2.01 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.10 0.00
4- 3 2.66 0.00 0.49 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.00
4- 4 2.85 0.00 0.03 -0.21 2.62 0.00 0.03 -0.16 0.23 0.00 0.00 -0.01
4- 5 2.58 0.00 0.00 -0.74 2.38 0.00 0.00 -0.58 0.20 0.00 0.00 -0.07
4- 6 1.85 -0.09 0.00 -1.28 1.78 -0.07 0.00 -1.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 -0.12
4- 7 0.67 -0.80 0.00 -1.81 0.82 -0.95 0.00 -1.42 0.05 -0.05 0.00 -0.17
4- 8 0.00 -2.50 0.00 -2.35 0.00 -2.36 0.00 -1.83 0.00 -0.18 0.00 -0.23
4- 9 0.00 -4.71 0.00 -2.88 0.00 -4.13 0.00 -2.25 0.00 -0.40 0.00 -0.28
4-10 0.00 -7.39 0.00 -3.42 0.00 -6.26 0.00 -2.67 0.00 -0.67 0.00 -0.34
Right
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 22 of 24
Serviceability Check: Crack Control (Fill Depth = 1.99 ft)
--------------------
Bar Fss Spacing Allow
Mark Location (ksi) (in) (in)
A1 Top Corner Bar 3.43 10.00 99.99
A2 Bot Corner Bar 1.39 10.00 99.99
A100 Top Slab (int) 25.11 10.00 11.98
A300 Top Slab (ext) 18.37 10.00 15.03
A200 Bot Slab (int) 20.62 10.00 13.18
A400 Bot Slab (ext) 20.80 10.00 12.72
B1 Ext Wall (int) 2.13 12.00 99.99
B2 Ext Wall (ext) 0.00 12.00 0.00
B3 Int Wall 0.00 8.00 99.99

Strength Limit State at Critical Sections: Flexure (Fill Depth = 1.99 ft)
--------------------------------------------------
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 14.00 -3.40 13.05 14.17 15.64 0.90 0.53 11.60 6.37 8.26
MID 38.00 0.84 0.87 5.65 5.29 0.90 0.20 11.60 5.92 7.67
MID- 38.00 -3.89 12.79 14.17 15.58 0.90 0.53 11.60 4.28 5.55
TOP 14.00 -6.68 13.05 14.17 15.64 0.90 0.53 11.60 2.57 3.33
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 13.00 -3.00 3.16 19.45 18.37 0.90 0.53 18.13 7.10 9.21
MID 52.00 13.78 -0.12 20.77 18.66 0.90 0.53 18.13 1.40 1.81
RT 13.00 -9.58 1.78 19.45 17.99 0.90 0.53 18.13 2.14 2.78
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 14.00 -1.66 19.94 8.40 12.12 0.90 0.30 11.60 7.69 9.96
MID 38.00 2.15 4.24 8.40 8.53 0.90 0.30 11.60 3.96 5.13
TOP 14.00 -5.86 19.40 8.40 11.99 0.90 0.30 11.60 2.05 2.66
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in
Design Corr. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Moment A. F. Mu Ma As 1.2Mcr IR OR
(in) (k-ft) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) phi (in2) (k-ft) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 13.00 -2.07 3.70 19.45 18.52 0.90 0.53 18.13 13.25 17.18
MID 52.00 7.27 0.20 13.96 12.62 0.90 0.37 18.13 1.99 2.58
RT 13.00 -10.75 2.10 19.45 18.08 0.90 0.53 18.13 1.93 2.50
Note: Mu - Resisting moment under pure flexure, Ma - Allowable moment under applied axial load
Strength Limit State at Critical Sections: Vertical Shear (Fill Depth = 1.99 ft)
---------------------------------------------------------
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Thickness = 8.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 19.76 2.08 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.79 8.80
MID 38.00 0.82 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.64 15.09
MID- 38.00 0.82 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.90 11.54
TOP 19.76 -2.20 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.77 7.48
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 20.20 9.05 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.41 1.82
MID 52.00 4.01 7.87 13.15 14.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.03 3.93
RT 20.20 11.31 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 1.43
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 23 of 24
Thickness = 8.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
BOT 19.76 1.85 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.20 6.74
MID 38.00 1.85 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.20 6.74
TOP 19.76 1.85 5.76 9.63 10.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.20 6.74
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Thickness = 10.00 in (Controlling Shear Method: Simplified)
Design Max. Load Ratings
Loc Dist. Shear Dv phi*Vn Vc Vs Av Spac IR OR
(in) (k) (in) (k) (k) (k) (in2) (in) (Str I)(Str II)
LT 20.20 3.52 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.97 6.44
MID 52.00 0.05 7.51 12.55 13.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.94 85.48
RT 20.20 6.59 7.37 12.32 13.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 2.92
Licensee: Michie Corporation (Henniker, NH) Sht:____of____
ETCulvert v.2.16 Analysis and design of culverts By:PJLChk:____
Copyright © 2010-2012 Eriksson Technologies, Inc.(www.LRFD.com) 8/7/2013 1:30:16 PM
Filename: LRFD BC Twin 8x5-6 Weaver Joppa 3935.etc Culvert p. 24 of 24
Load Combination Results at Tenth Points: (k, k-ft)(Fill Depth = 1.99 ft)
----------------------------------------
M-PT +Moment -Moment +Axial -Axial +Shear -Shear
Member 1: (Exterior Wall)
Bottom
1- 0 -1.747 -6.520 0.603 13.052 3.701 0.198
1- 1 -1.504 -4.425 0.603 13.052 3.049 -0.103
1- 2 -0.578 -3.205 1.521 12.786 2.432 -0.382
1- 3 0.242 -3.246 1.521 12.786 1.849 -0.637
1- 4 0.703 -3.441 1.521 12.786 1.301 -0.870
1- 5 0.840 -3.885 0.869 12.786 0.823 -1.115
1- 6 1.104 -4.619 0.869 12.786 0.637 -1.593
1- 7 1.096 -5.468 0.869 12.786 0.474 -2.037
1- 8 0.846 -6.416 0.869 12.786 0.334 -2.447
1- 9 1.006 -8.076 0.603 13.052 0.217 -2.822
1-10 1.111 -9.972 0.603 13.052 0.123 -3.162
Top
Member 2: (Top Slab)
Left
2- 0 1.111 -9.972 -0.123 3.162 12.449 0.603
2- 1 5.361 -3.771 -0.123 3.162 10.986 -0.219
2- 2 9.257 -0.681 -0.123 2.103 8.933 -1.444
2- 3 12.374 0.013 -0.123 2.103 7.228 -2.878
2- 4 13.781 -0.184 -0.123 3.162 5.617 -4.280
2- 5 13.567 -1.027 -0.123 3.162 4.006 -5.892
2- 6 11.691 -2.229 -0.123 3.162 2.455 -7.469
2- 7 8.609 -3.980 1.260 1.779 1.020 -9.189
2- 8 4.743 -6.237 1.260 1.779 -0.243 -11.199
2- 9 0.717 -10.694 1.260 1.779 -1.070 -13.086
2-10 -2.114 -19.833 2.103 1.779 -1.358 -14.390
Right
Member 3: (Interior Wall)
Bottom
3- 0 3.734 -3.734 4.241 19.936 1.851 -1.851
3- 1 2.561 -2.561 4.241 19.936 1.851 -1.851
3- 2 1.392 -1.392 4.241 19.936 1.851 -1.851
3- 3 0.410 -0.410 4.241 19.936 1.851 -1.851
3- 4 0.987 -0.987 4.241 19.936 1.851 -1.851
3- 5 2.154 -2.154 4.241 19.936 1.851 -1.851
3- 6 3.326 -3.326 4.773 19.404 1.851 -1.851
3- 7 4.498 -4.498 4.773 19.404 1.851 -1.851
3- 8 5.671 -5.671 4.773 19.404 1.851 -1.851
3- 9 6.844 -6.844 4.773 19.404 1.851 -1.851
3-10 8.016 -8.016 4.773 19.404 1.851 -1.851
Top
Member 4: (Bottom Slab)
Left
4- 0 -1.747 -6.520 0.198 3.701 6.550 1.918
4- 1 1.641 -2.522 0.198 3.701 4.990 1.544
4- 2 4.592 -0.703 0.198 2.858 3.430 1.171
4- 3 6.566 0.150 0.198 2.858 1.870 0.648
4- 4 7.266 0.680 0.198 2.858 0.459 -0.263
4- 5 6.614 0.885 0.198 2.858 0.051 -1.822
4- 6 4.614 0.767 0.198 2.858 -0.323 -3.382
4- 7 1.837 -1.646 1.799 2.100 -0.696 -4.942
4- 8 -0.439 -6.081 2.858 2.100 -1.070 -6.502
4- 9 -1.528 -12.300 2.858 2.100 -1.443 -8.061
4-10 -2.940 -19.871 2.858 2.100 -1.816 -9.621
Right
Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Design/Analysis References:
1. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th Edition.
2. NHDOT 2010 Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction.
3. Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering, 5th Edition.
4. Holtz & Kovacs, Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering
5. AISC, Steel Construction Manual, 13th Edition
6. Highway Innovative Technology Evaluation Center (HITEC), Evaluation of the Con/Span Wingwall System, CERF
Report #40580, July 2001.
7. Contract Plans, "Roadway reconstruction Plans, Joppa Hill Rd", Sheets 1-40 by Bedford Public Works Project
#77-2013, Dated 5/2/13.

Assumptions:
1. It is assumed that the failure plane of the soil to be retained by this wall will lie within the proposed
backfill material.
2. The proposed backfill material is assumed to have a friction angle = 32 degrees and a dry unit weight = 120 pcf.
3. The installation of the weepholes will preclude the development of hydrostatic pressures on the wall.
4. Passive earth pressure in front of the wall is ignored per AASHTO 11.6.3.5.
5. Site Layout. The 8x5.5 Twin Cell BC carries Joppa Hill Rd over McQuade Brook. WW2/4 are skewed 60 degrees from
the culvert, WW1/3 are skewed 30 degrees. The roadway is skewed 70 degrees from the culvert (i.e. 20 degrees off of square).
Therefore, skews from road are WW1/3 = 40 deg,WW2/4 = 50 deg.
6. Backslope Angle. Assume 2:1 backslope, all four wings.
7. Live Load Surcharge. Vehicular Surcharge is applied when traffic can come within a distance of half the height of the
wall to the back face of wall. Since the wingwalls are skewed, the distance to traffic at each anchor will increase by L*tan(x),
where L is the plan distance down the wall from the culv ert and x is the angle that the wall makes with the road (s ee #5). Since
the distance to traffic changes, traffic surcharge may or may not be included depending on the location of each anchor.
8. The HITEC Evaluation (page 3) explains that the Anchor Wall acts as a cantilever wall for most of its length since the
weight of the soil within and above the anchors provides resistance to overturning. The wall also has attributes of a bin wall
since arching and friction of soil masses between anchors provides additional resistance. Therefore, the provisions of AASHTO
Sections 11.6 (Conventional Retaining Walls) and 11.11 (Modular Walls) shall be applied.
9. Per AASHTO 11.11.4.4, a maximum of 80% of the weight of the retained soil is effective in resisting overturning. The
HITEC Evaluation (pages D29-D33) evaluated the accuracy of this assumption and found that using 80% of the soil weight is a
conservative assumption.
10. The Top of Wingwall elevations are 2 inches below the top of headwall elevations.
11. WW3 has the tallest 2/3 design height with steepest backfill, and will control design.

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 1 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

General Input:
ELVwalltop := 413.08ft Elevation of the Wingwall at its tallest point.

ELVwalltip := 410.25ft Elevation of Wingwall at its tip.

ELVbot.ftg := 400.17ft Elevation of the Bottom of the Wall Footing

t ftg := 2.5ft Thickness of Wall Footing

h ftg := 4ft Height of Wall Footing

h short := ELVwalltip − ELVbot.ftg − h ftg − 1in = 5.997 ft Short end of wall (less 1" for shim)

h tall := ELVwalltop − ELVbot.ftg − h ftg − 1in = 8.827 ft Tall end of wall (less 1" for shim)

l wall := 14ft Length of Wall Panel

l flat := 1ft Length of flat portion of wingwall before break in slope.

t wall := 12in Thickness of Wall P anel

t stem := 6in Thickness of Anchor Stem

wflange := 2ft + 6in Width of Anchor Flange

αskew := 40deg Angle of ww skew in plan view, measured from edge of roadway.
(to measure distance to traffic for each anchor)
θwall := 90deg Wall batter angle with horizontal

θanchor := θwall + 30deg Anchor batter angle with horizontal

β := atan 
1
 = 26.565⋅ deg Backfill slope angle with horizontal, measured perpendicular to
2 the wall.
( 2ft)
d traffic := = 2.611 ft Estimated minimum distance to traffic, measured from
(
cos αskew ) backfill side of wall and perpendicular to the wall.
2ft
BreakInSlope := = 2.611 ft Assumed distance from face of guardrail to break-in-slope,
(
cos αskew ) meaured perpendicular to the wall.

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 2 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Wall Material Properties

Concrete

lbf
fc := 5000 Ec := 4074ksi Aggregatediam := .75in
2
in

γc := 150pcf Assumed unit weight of concrete panel.

β1 = Stress Block Factor specified in Article


5.7.2.2
β1 := max.65 ,  .85 if fc < 4000psi  = 0.8
  
  .05  fc − 4000psi  
  .85 − psi ⋅  1000  otherwise 
    

Steel:

lbf
fy := 60000 Es := 29000ksi
2
in

Soil:
γs := 120pcf Assumed soil unit weight for all soil

q sur := 2ft⋅ γs = 240 ⋅ psf Surcharge Soil Pressure (AASHTO Tbl 3.11.6.4-2)

ϕftg := 35deg Friction Anlge of Soil below Wall Footing

ϕbackfill := 32deg Friction Angle of Backfill Soil

δwall := 0.75⋅ ϕbackfill = 24⋅ deg AASHTO C3.11.5.9-1 and HITEC p.D19

δanchor := 0.50⋅ ϕbackfill = 16⋅ deg AASHTO C3.11.5.9-1 and HITEC p.D19

(
sin θwall + ϕbackfill )2
ka.wall := = 0.459
2 AASHTO 3.11.5.3
 sin( ϕbackfill + δwall) ⋅ sin( ϕbackfill − β) 
sin( θwall) ⋅ sin( θwall − δwall) ⋅  1 + 
2
 sin( θwall − δwall) ⋅ sin( θwall + β) 

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 3 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

2
(
sin θanchor + ϕbackfill )
ka.anchor := = 0.163
2 AASHTO
 sin( ϕbackfill + δanchor ) ⋅ sin( ϕbackfill − β)  3.11.5.3
sin( θanchor ) ⋅ sin( θanchor − δanchor ) ⋅  1 + 
2
 sin( θanchor − δanchor ) ⋅ sin( θanchor + β) 

(
k0 := 1 − sin ϕbackfill = 0.47 ) AASHTO 3.11.5.2-1

Determine Load Factors (Strength I) (AASHTO 1.3 and Table 3.4.1-1)


Load Modifiers

ηD := 1.00 Ductility for a conventional design

ηR := 1.00 Redundancy for conventional design

ηI := 1.00 Importance for a conventional bridge

(
ηi := max ηD⋅ ηR ⋅ ηI , 0.95 ) ηi = 1

Load Factor Max Min Service

γDC 1.25 0.9 1.0 Component Dead Loads

γEH 1.5 0.9 1.0 Horizontal Earth Loads

γEV 1.35 1.0 1.0 Vertical Earth Loads

γLL 1.75 1.75 1.0 Live Loads

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 4 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Anchor Types, Layout and Backfill Geometry

ConnectedToBridge := "No" To account for the connection of the wing to the bridge. Choose
between Yes and No.

AnchorType1 := "D" Anchor Type to be tied to the back face of the wall. Chosen
between Anchor Type B, C, D, and E as defined below.
AnchorType2 := "C"

AnchorType3 := "C"

Distance to each anchor is from culvert end of wing. Anchor 1 is closest to culvert.
distanchor.1 := 2ft
Note: Research in HITEC report supports spacing from 2.5 ft (anchors are touching) to 5.5
distanchor.2 := 7ft feet (HITEC Report pages D29-D33). If distance between anchors increases beyond 5.5 ft,
data supporting the usable 80% soil weight assumption shall be provided due to possible
affects on soil arching between the anchors. Similarly, anchor closest to the wall tip shall not
distanchor.3 := 13ft
exceed 3 feet without supporting data.
If only 1 anchor is used, set dist anchor2 = dist anchor3 = 0.
If only 2 anchors are used, set dist anchor3 = 0.

Tributary Width of Wall for each Anchor

tribplates := 0 if ConnectedToBridge = "No" = 0 ft


1
⋅ distanchor.1 otherwise
2

trib1 := l wall − tribplates if distanchor.2 = 0 = 4.5 ft

1
2
( )
⋅ distanchor.1 + distanchor.2 − tribplates otherwise

l 1 
trib2 :=  wall − 2 ( distanchor.1 + distanchor.2) if distanchor.3 = 0 = 5.5 ft
 
1 1
2
(distanchor.2 + distanchor.3) − 2 (distanchor.1 + distanchor.2) otherwise

(
trib3 := l wall − trib1 + trib2 + tribplates = 4 ft )

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 5 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Height of Wall at CL of Each Anchor

h ( x) := 0 if x = 0
h tall if 0 < x ≤ l flat

  h tall − hshort  
h tall −  l  ⋅ ( x − l flat) otherwise
  wall − lflat  

( )
h wall.1 := h distanchor.1 = 8.609 ft Height of wall at each anchor

h wall.2 := h ( distanchor.2) = 7.521 ft

h wall.3 := h ( distanchor.3) = 6.214 ft

Length of each Anchor Stem Ext ension

W is the additional anchor stem length beyond that of a "B"


W( x) := ( 0ft) if x = "B"
anchor. W(B) = 0
( 1ft) if x = "C"
( 2ft) if x = "D"
( 3ft) if x = "E"

( )
W1 := W AnchorType1 = 2 ft

W2 := W( AnchorType2 ) = 1 ft

W3 := W( AnchorType3 ) = 1 ft

Width of Soil Column above each Anchor

Bbot is the width of the soil column at the top of the anchor, measured from backfill side of wall to upper tip of each anchor.

7in
Bbot.1 := W1 + ( 3ft + 5.375in) + = 6.121 ft
cos( 30deg)
7in
Bbot.2 := W2 + ( 3ft + 5.375in) + = 5.121 ft
cos( 30deg)
7in
Bbot.3 := W3 + ( 3ft + 5.375in) + = 5.121 ft
cos( 30deg)

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 6 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Bbot.lower is the width of the soil column at the bottom of the anchor, measured from backfill side of wall to bottom tip of
anchor.

Bbot.lower.1 := W1 +  1ft + 4in +  = 4.007 ft


7in

 cos( 30deg ) 
Bbot.lower.2 := W2 +  1ft + 4in +  = 3.007 ft
7in

 cos( 30deg) 

Bbot.lower.3 := W3 +  1ft + 4in +  = 3.007 ft


7in

 cos( 30deg ) 

Perpendicular Distance to Traffic at each Anchor

(
d traffic.1 := d traffic + distanchor.1⋅ tan αskew = 4.289 ft)
(
d traffic.2 := d traffic + distanchor.2⋅ tan αskew = 8.485 ft)
( )
d traffic.3 := d traffic + distanchor.3⋅ tan αskew = 13.519 ft

Height of backfill at CL of each anchor

( (
d slope.1 := max 0 , min Bbot.1 , d traffic.1 − BreakInSlope )) = 1.678 ft Distance to break in slope, measured
perpendicular to wall from inside face of wall,
d slope.2 := max( 0 , min( Bbot.2 , d traffic.2 − BreakInSlope ) ) = 5.121 ft limited by B.bot.

d slope.3 := max( 0 , min( Bbot.3 , d traffic.3 − BreakInSlope ) ) = 5.121 ft

( ( ) )
h backfill.1 := max h wall.1 , h wall.1 + min Bbot.1 , d slope.1 ⋅ tan( β) = 9.448 ft The height of backfill is taken at the
end of the reinforced soil mass.
h backfill.2 := max( h wall.2 , h wall.2 + min( Bbot.2 , d slope.2) ⋅ tan( β) ) = 10.081 ft

h backfill.3 := max( h wall.3 , h wall.3 + min( Bbot.3 , d slope.3) ⋅ tan( β) ) = 8.775 ft

Calculate Nominal Bearing Resistance


Per 11.11.4.3, Soil bearing resistance shall be evaluated according to 10.6.3. Per 11.5.3, bearing resistance shall be
investigated at the strength limit state. Per HITEC p. D24, check soil bearing pressure under the precast footing.

γfdtn := γs = 120 ⋅ pcf


Assumed Unit wt of foundation soil

ϕfdtn := 32deg Assumed internal friction angle of natural foundation soil.

Calculate Cohesion Term Ncm

Ncm := 0ksf Granular foundation soil. Does not apply. (Eq 10.6.3.1.2a-2)

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 7 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Calculate Surcharge (Embedment) Term, Nqm

Df := h ftg = 4 ft Depth of Footing

1
B := (
t −t
2 ftg wall
) ( )
+ t wall + min B bot.lower.1 , Bbot.lower.2 , B bot.lower.3 = 4.757 ft - Per HITEC, the vertical reaction
will be supported on the horizontal
portion of the anchor plus the
Nq := 23.2 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-1 footing.

B
sq := 1 +
l wall
( )
⋅ tan ϕfdtn = 1.212 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-3

d q := 1.00 Conservative estimate based on Table 10.6.3.1.2a-4

i q := 1.00 Per commentary on pg 10-63 regarding footings with modest embedment.

Nqm := Nq ⋅ sq ⋅ d q ⋅ i q = 28.126 Eq 10.6.3.1.2a-3

Calculate Surcharge (Embedment) Term, Nγ m

Nγ := 30.2 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-1

sγ := 1 − 0.4⋅ 
B 
 = 0.864 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-3
 lwall 
i γ := 1.00 Per commentary on pg 10-63 regarding footings with modest embedment.

Nγm := Nγ⋅ sγ⋅ i γ = 26.095 Eq 10.6.3.1.2a-4

Calculate Nominal Bearing Resistance

Cwq := 0.5 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-2, conservatively assuming a depth of water at 0.0 ft

Cwγ := 0.5 Table 10.6.3.1.2a-2, conservatively assuming a depth of water at 0.0 ft

q n := γfdtn⋅ Df ⋅ Nqm⋅ C wq + 0.5⋅ γfdtn⋅ B⋅ Nγm⋅ Cwγ = 10.47⋅ ksf Eq. (10.6.3.1.2a-1)

ϕb := 0.45 Table 10.5.5.2.2-1

( )
q R := min ϕb ⋅ q n = 4.71⋅ ksf Eq. 10.6.3.1.1-1

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 8 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

External Stability Analysis at Anchor 1

Calculate Vertical Load s and Associated Lever Arms (All Lever Arms are f rom Po int "O")

kip
DCwall.1 := t wall⋅ h wall.1⋅ γc = 1.291⋅
ft
1
xDC.wall.1 := t wall = 0.5 ft
2

1 kip
( )(
EV1a1 := γs⋅ h backfill.1 − h wall.1 ⋅ d slope.1 = 0.084⋅
2 ft
)
2
xEV1a.1 := t wall + d slope.1 = 2.119 ft
3

kip
( )(
EV1b1 := γs⋅ h backfill.1 − h wall.1 ⋅ B bot.1 − d slope.1 = 0.447⋅ )ft
1
xEV1b.1 := t wall + d slope.1 + (B
2 bot.1
)
− d slope.1 = 4.9 ft

kip
( )
EV2 1 := γs⋅ h wall.1 − 3.5ft ⋅ B bot.1 = 3.753⋅
ft
1
xEV2.1 := t wall + B bot.1 = 4.061 ft
2

EV3 1 := γs⋅ ( 3.5ft) ⋅  Bbot.lower.1 −  = 1.4⋅ kip


7in

 cos( 30deg)  ft

xEV3.1 := t wall +  Bbot.lower.1 − 


1 7in
2
 = 2.667 ft
cos( 30deg) 

EV4 1 := γs⋅ ⋅ 3.5ft⋅  W1 + 3ft + 5.375in −  Bbot.lower.1 −  = 0.444⋅ kip


1 7in
2 
( 
) 
cos( 30deg)  ft

xEV4.1 := t wall + Bbot.lower.1 + ⋅ W1 + 3ft + 5.375in −  B bot.lower.1 −  = 5.712 ft


1 7in

3   cos( 30deg) 

1 kip
DCanchor.1 := ⋅ ( 1740lbf ) if AnchorType1 = "B" = 0.508⋅
trib1 ft (See Anchor Geometry
( 2010lbf ) if AnchorType1 = "C" Drawing)

( 2285lbf ) if AnchorType1 = "D"

( 2550lbf ) if AnchorType1 = "E"

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 9 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

xanchor.1 := t wall + ( 2ft + 2.25in) if AnchorType1 = "B" = 4.427⋅ ft

( 2ft + 8.8125in) if AnchorType1 = "C"

( 3ft + 5.125in) if AnchorType1 = "D"

( 4ft + 0.0625in) if AnchorType1 = "E"

kip
LSvert.1 := q sur⋅ Bbot.1 − ( d traffic.1 ) if d traffic.1 < Bbot.1 = 0.44⋅ Used in bearing calcs only
ft
0 otherwise
1
xLS.vert.1 := t wall + d traffic.1 + B
2 bot.1
( )
− d traffic.1 = 6.205 ft

kip
DCftg.1 := γc⋅ t ftg⋅ h ftg = 1.5⋅
ft
t ftg
xDC.ftg.1 := = 1.25 ft Note: This moment arm is measured from the front toe of
2 the ftg since it is only used in bearing calculations.

Calculate Lateral Loads and Associated L ever Arms

1 2 kip
EH1 1.vert :=
2
( ) (
ka.wall⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.1 − 3.5ft ⋅ sin δwall = 0.396⋅ )
ft
1 2 kip
EH1 1.hor :=
2
( ) (
ka.wall⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.1 − 3.5ft ⋅ cos δwall = 0.89⋅
ft
)
xEH1.1 := t wall + Bbot.1 = 7.121 ft

1
yEH1.1 := 3.5ft + h (
3 backfill.1
− 3.5ft = 5.483 ft )

kip
( ) (
EH2 1.vert := ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.1 − 3.5ft ⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ sin δanchor − 30deg = −0.113⋅
ft
)
kip
( ) (
EH2 1.hor := ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.1 − 3.5ft ⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ cos δanchor − 30deg = 0.452⋅
ft
)
1
xEH2.1 := t wall + B
2 bot.1
(
+ Bbot.lower.1 = 6.064 ft )
1
yEH2.1 := 3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft = 1.5 ft
2

1 2 kip
EH3 1.vert :=
2
( )
ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ sin δanchor − 30deg = −0.038⋅
ft

1 2 kip
EH3 1.hor :=
2
(
ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ cos δanchor − 30deg = 0.152⋅ )ft

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 10 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

xEH3.1 := t wall + Bbot.lower.1 +  3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft tan( 30deg) = 5.488 ft


2
 3 
2
yEH3.1 := 3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft = 10⋅ in
3

h wall.1 kip
LShor.1 := ( ka.wall⋅ qsur⋅ hbackfill.1) if d traffic.1 <
2
= 1.04⋅
ft
0 otherwise

1
xLS.hor.1 := t wall + B (
2 bot.lower.1
)
+ Bbot.1 = 6.064 ft (Assumed for ease of calculation)

1
yLS.hor.1 := h backfill.1 = 4.724 ft
2

Check Sliding

Per AASHTO 11.11.4.2, Sliding shall be evaluated according to 10.6.3.4. Per 11.5.3, sliding shall be evaluated at the strength
limit state. Use minimum load factors for vertical loads and maximum load factors for horizontal loads. Assume the failure
plane is beneath the wall ftg, which will be grouted to the wall during construction. This is consistent with assumptions in the
HITEC report (page D24).

Resisting Forces

ϕτ := 0.9 AASHTO Table 10.5.5.2.2-1, "Precast on Sand" or "Soil on Soil"

kip
( ) (
ΣV1 := 0.9 DCwall.1 + DCanchor.1 + DCftg.1 + 1.0⋅ EV1a1 + EV1b1 + EV2 1 + EV3 1 + EV4 1 ... = 9.466⋅
ft
)
(
+ ηi ⋅ 1.50⋅ EH1 1.vert + EH2 1.vert + EH3 1.vert )
kip
( )
Rτ.1 := 0.8⋅ tan ϕftg ⋅ ΣV1 = 5.303⋅
ft AASHTO 10.6.3.4
kip
Rr.1 := ϕτ⋅ Rτ.1 = 4.773⋅
ft

Driving Forces

kip
 (  )
ΣHτ.1 := ηi ⋅ 1.50⋅ EH1 1.hor + EH2 1.hor + EH3 1.hor + 1.75LShor.1 = 4.06⋅
ft

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 11 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

R r.1
Checksliding.1 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
ΣHτ.1

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 12 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Check Overturning and Eccentricity

Per AASHTO 11.11.4.4, Overturning shall be evaluated according to 11.6.3.3. A maximum of 80% of the retained soil shall
be used to resist overturning. Per 11.6.3.3, evaluate overturning and eccentricity at the strength limit state using maximum
load factors for horizontal loads and minimum load factors for vertical loads. First, evaluate overturning about front base of
wall. If the wall passes the overturning check, the wing will not experience uplift with respect to the footing. Therefore
evaluate eccentricity at the bottom of the footing. The location of the resultant of the reaction forces shall be located within
the middle half of the base width (footing width plus anchor projection). Eccentricity is measured from the center of the
base width toward the stream side of the footing. Assume that a negative eccentricity (beyond the center of the base,
toward the backfill) is acceptable since this condition will engage passive earth pressures.

Resisting Forces

kip ⋅ ft
(
Resisting1 := 0.9 DCwall.1⋅ xDC.wall.1 + DCanchor.1⋅ xanchor.1 ... ) = 24.604⋅
ft
(
+ 1.0⋅ 0.8⋅ EV1a1 ⋅ xEV1a.1 + EV1b1 ⋅ xEV1b.1 + EV2 1 ⋅ xEV2.1 + EV3 1 ⋅ xEV3.1 + EV4 1 ⋅ xEV4.1 ... )
(
+ 1.50 EH1 1.vert⋅ xEH1.1 + EH2 1.vert⋅ xEH2.1 + EH3 1.vert⋅ xEH3.1 )

Driving Forces

kip ⋅ ft
( )
Driving1 := 1.50⋅ EH1 1.hor⋅ yEH1.1 + EH2 1.hor⋅ yEH2.1 + EH3 1.hor⋅ yEH3.1 + 1.75LShor.1⋅ yLS.hor.1 = 17.122⋅
ft

Resisting 1
CheckOT.1 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
Driving1

"NG" otherwise

Eccentricity of Resultant

kip
( ) (
ΣVe.1 := 0.9 DCwall.1 + DCanchor.1 + 1.0⋅ 0.8⋅ EV1a1 + EV1b1 + EV2 1 + EV3 1 + EV4 1 ... = 6.891⋅
ft
)
(
+ 1.50 EH1 1.vert + EH2 1.vert + EH3 1.vert )

  ( Resisting1 − Driving1 ) 1  
ΣVe.1 ⋅  + ( t ftg − t wall) + 0.9DCftg.1⋅ xDC.ftg.1
ΣVe.1 2
l 1 :=
    = 1.74 ft (Distance to resultant
ΣV + 0.9DC e.1 ftg.1 from face of ftg)

1
B1 := B bot.lower.1 + t wall + t −t
2 ftg wall
(
= 5.757 ft )

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 13 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

 B1 
e1 := max − l 1 , 0ft = 1.139 ft
 2 
B1
eallow.1 := = 1.439 ft (Within Middle Half of ftg per e1
4 AASHTO 11.6.3.3) Checke.1 := "OK" if ≤1 = "OK"
eallow.1

"NG" otherwise
Check Bearing Pressure

Per 11.11.4.3 Evaluate bearing pressure with respect to resistance calculated in 10.6.3. Per HITEC p. D24, use the
horizontal portion of the anchor at its base plus the footing width. Evaluate at the strength limit state. Use 100% of the
weight of the retained soil. When Live Load Surcharge is present, Strength I with maximum load factors for vertical loads
and horizontal loads controls. Include the effects of live load surcharge. Since lever arms are calculated from the front face
of the wall, must add to the eccentricity the distance between wall and toe of footing.

kip ⋅ ft
(
Resistingbrg.1 := 1.25 DCwall.1⋅ xDC.wall.1 + DCanchor.1⋅ xanchor.1 ... ) = 43.237⋅
ft
(
+ 1.35⋅ EV1a1 ⋅ xEV1a.1 + EV1b1 ⋅ xEV1b.1 + EV2 1 ⋅ xEV2.1 + EV3 1 ⋅ xEV3.1 + EV4 1 ⋅ xEV4.1 ... )
(
+ 1.35 EH1 1.vert⋅ xEH1.1 + EH2 1.vert⋅ xEH2.1 + EH3 1.vert⋅ xEH3.1 ... )
+ 1.75⋅ ( LSvert.1⋅ xLS.vert.1)

kip ⋅ ft
( )
Drivingbrg.1 := 1.35 EH1 1.hor⋅ yEH1.1 + EH2 1.hor⋅ yEH2.1 + EH3 1.hor⋅ yEH3.1 + 1.75LShor.1⋅ yLS.hor.1 = 16.27⋅
ft

kip
( ) (
ΣVbrg.1 := 1.25⋅ DCwall.1 + DCanchor.1 + 1.35⋅ EV1a1 + EV1b1 + EV2 1 + EV3 1 + EV4 1 ... = 11.624⋅
ft
)
(
+ 1.35⋅ EH1 1.vert + EH2 1.vert + EH3 1.vert + 1.75⋅ LSvert.1 ) ( )

  ( Resistingbrg.1 − Drivingbrg.1) 1  
 brg.1 
ΣV ⋅ + ( t ftg − t wall) + 1.25DCftg.1⋅ xDC.ftg.1
ΣVbrg.1 2
l brg.1 :=
    = 2.817 ft (Distance to resultant
ΣV + 1.25DC brg.1 ftg.1 from face of ftg)

 B1 
ebrg.1 := max − l brg.1 , 0ft = 0.061 ft
 2 

ΣVbrg.1
σfoot.1 := = 2.063⋅ ksf
B1 − 2 ⋅ ebrg.1 Eq. 11.6.3.2-1, Rectangular Distibution for
Foundations on soil

q R = 4.713⋅ ksf
qR
CheckBearing1 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
σfoot.1

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 14 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

External Stability Analysis at Anchor 2

Calculate Vertical Load s and Associated Lever Arms (All Lever Arms are f rom Po int "O")

kip
DCwall.2 := t wall⋅ h wall.2⋅ γc = 1.128⋅
ft
1
xDC.wall.2 := t wall = 0.5 ft
2

1 kip
( )(
EV1a2 := γs⋅ h backfill.2 − h wall.2 ⋅ d slope.2 = 0.787⋅
2 ft
)
2
xEV1a.2 := t wall + d slope.2 = 4.414 ft
3

kip
( )(
EV1b2 := γs⋅ h backfill.2 − h wall.2 ⋅ B bot.2 − d slope.2 = 0 ⋅
ft
)
1
xEV1b.2 := t wall + d slope.2 + (B
2 bot.2
)
− d slope.2 = 6.121 ft

kip
( )
EV2 2 := γs⋅ h wall.2 − 3.5ft ⋅ B bot.2 = 2.471⋅
ft
1
xEV2.2 := t wall + B bot.2 = 3.561 ft
2

EV3 2 := γs⋅ ( 3.5ft) ⋅  Bbot.lower.2 −  = 0.98⋅ kip


7in

 cos( 30deg)  ft

xEV3.2 := t wall +  Bbot.lower.2 − 


1 7in
2
 = 2.167 ft
cos( 30deg) 

EV4 2 := γs⋅ ⋅ 3.5ft⋅  W2 + 3ft + 5.375in −  Bbot.lower.2 −  = 0.444⋅ kip


1 7in
2 
( 
) 
cos( 30deg)  ft

xEV4.2 := t wall + Bbot.lower.2 + ⋅ W2 + 3ft + 5.375in −  B bot.lower.2 −  = 4.712 ft


1 7in

3   cos( 30deg) 

1 kip
DCanchor.2 := ⋅ ( 1740lbf ) if AnchorType2 = "B" = 0.365⋅
trib2 ft (See Anchor Geometry
( 2010lbf ) if AnchorType2 = "C" Drawing)

( 2285lbf ) if AnchorType2 = "D"

( 2550lbf ) if AnchorType2 = "E"

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 15 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

xanchor.2 := t wall + ( 2ft + 2.25in) if AnchorType2 = "B" = 3.734⋅ ft

( 2ft + 8.8125in) if AnchorType2 = "C"

( 3ft + 5.125in) if AnchorType2 = "D"

( 4ft + 0.0625in) if AnchorType2 = "E"

kip
LSvert.2 := q sur⋅ Bbot.2 − ( d traffic.2 ) if d traffic.2 < Bbot.2 = 0⋅ Used in bearing calcs only
ft
0 otherwise
1
xLS.vert.2 := t wall + d traffic.2 + B
2 bot.2
( )
− d traffic.2 = 7.803 ft

kip
DCftg.2 := γc⋅ t ftg⋅ h ftg = 1.5⋅
ft
t ftg
xDC.ftg.2 := = 1.25 ft Note: This moment arm is measured from the front toe of
2 the ftg since it is only used in bearing calculations.

Calculate Lateral Loads and Associated L ever Arms

1 2 kip
EH1 2.vert :=
2
( ) (
ka.wall⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.2 − 3.5ft ⋅ sin δwall = 0.485⋅ )
ft
1 2 kip
EH1 2.hor :=
2
( ) (
ka.wall⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.2 − 3.5ft ⋅ cos δwall = 1.089⋅ )
ft

xEH1.2 := t wall + Bbot.2 = 6.121 ft

1
yEH1.2 := 3.5ft + h (
3 backfill.2
− 3.5ft = 5.694 ft )

kip
( ) (
EH2 2.vert := ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.2 − 3.5ft ⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ sin δanchor − 30deg = −0.125⋅
ft
)
kip
( ) (
EH2 2.hor := ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.2 − 3.5ft ⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ cos δanchor − 30deg = 0.5⋅
ft
)
1
xEH2.2 := t wall + B
2 bot.2
(
+ Bbot.lower.2 = 5.064 ft )
1
yEH2.2 := 3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft = 1.5 ft
2

1 2 kip
EH3 2.vert :=
2
( )
ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ sin δanchor − 30deg = −0.038⋅
ft

1 2 kip
EH3 2.hor :=
2
(
ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ cos δanchor − 30deg = 0.152⋅ )ft

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 16 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

xEH3.2 := t wall + Bbot.lower.2 +  3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft tan( 30deg) = 4.488 ft


2
 3 
2
yEH3.2 := 3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft = 10⋅ in
3

h wall.2 kip
LShor.2 := ( ka.wall⋅ qsur⋅ hbackfill.2) if d traffic.2 <
2
= 0⋅
ft
0 otherwise

1
xLS.hor.2 := t wall + B (
2 bot.lower.2
)
+ Bbot.2 = 5.064 ft (Assumed for ease of calculation)

1
yLS.hor.2 := h backfill.2 = 5.041 ft
2

Check Sliding

Per AASHTO 11.11.4.2, Sliding shall be evaluated according to 10.6.3.4. Per 11.5.3, sliding shall be evaluated at the strength
limit state. Use minimum load factors for vertical loads and maximum load factors for horizontal loads. Assume the failure
plane is beneath the wall ftg, which will be grouted to the wall during construction. This is consistent with assumptions in the
HITEC report (page D24).

Resisting Forces

ϕτ := 0.9 AASHTO Table 10.5.5.2.2-1, "Precast on Sand" or "Soil on Soil"

kip
( ) (
ΣV2 := 0.9 DCwall.2 + DCanchor.2 + DCftg.2 + 1.0⋅ EV1a2 + EV1b2 + EV2 2 + EV3 2 + EV4 2 ... = 7.86⋅
ft
)
(
+ ηi ⋅ 1.50⋅ EH1 2.vert + EH2 2.vert + EH3 2.vert )
kip
( )
Rτ.2 := 0.8⋅ tan ϕftg ⋅ ΣV2 = 4.403⋅
ft AASHTO 10.6.3.4
kip
Rr.2 := ϕτ⋅ Rτ.2 = 3.962⋅
ft

Driving Forces

kip
 (  )
ΣHτ.2 := ηi ⋅ 1.50⋅ EH1 2.hor + EH2 2.hor + EH3 2.hor + 1.75LShor.2 = 2.611⋅
ft

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 17 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

R r.2
Checksliding.2 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
ΣHτ.2

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 18 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Check Overturning and Eccentricity

Per AASHTO 11.11.4.4, Overturning shall be evaluated according to 11.6.3.3. A maximum of 80% of the retained soil shall
be used to resist overturning. Per 11.6.3.3, evaluate overturning and eccentricity at the strength limit state using maximum
load factors for horizontal loads and minimum load factors for vertical loads. First, evaluate overturning about front base of
wall. If the wall passes the overturning check, the wing will not experience uplift with respect to the footing. Therefore
evaluate eccentricity at the bottom of the footing. The location of the resultant of the reaction forces shall be located within
the middle half of the base width (footing width plus anchor projection). Eccentricity is measured from the center of the
base width toward the stream side of the footing. Assume that a negative eccentricity (beyond the center of the base,
toward the backfill) is acceptable since this condition will engage passive earth pressures.

Resisting Forces

kip ⋅ ft
(
Resisting2 := 0.9 DCwall.2⋅ xDC.wall.2 + DCanchor.2⋅ xanchor.2 ... ) = 18.177⋅
ft
(
+ 1.0⋅ 0.8⋅ EV1a2 ⋅ xEV1a.2 + EV1b2 ⋅ xEV1b.2 + EV2 2 ⋅ xEV2.2 + EV3 2 ⋅ xEV3.2 + EV4 2 ⋅ xEV4.2 ... )
(
+ 1.50 EH1 2.vert⋅ xEH1.2 + EH2 2.vert⋅ xEH2.2 + EH3 2.vert⋅ xEH3.2 )

Driving Forces

kip ⋅ ft
( )
Driving2 := 1.50⋅ EH1 2.hor⋅ yEH1.2 + EH2 2.hor⋅ yEH2.2 + EH3 2.hor⋅ yEH3.2 + 1.75LShor.2⋅ yLS.hor.2 = 10.616⋅
ft

Resisting 2
CheckOT.2 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
Driving2

"NG" otherwise

Eccentricity of Resultant

kip
( ) (
ΣVe.2 := 0.9 DCwall.2 + DCanchor.2 + 1.0⋅ 0.8⋅ EV1a2 + EV1b2 + EV2 2 + EV3 2 + EV4 2 ... = 5.573⋅
ft
)
(
+ 1.50 EH1 2.vert + EH2 2.vert + EH3 2.vert )

  ( Resisting2 − Driving2 ) 1  
ΣVe.2 ⋅  + ( t ftg − t wall) + 0.9DCftg.2⋅ xDC.ftg.2
ΣVe.2 2
l 2 :=
    = 1.94 ft (Distance to resultant
ΣV + 0.9DC e.2 ftg.2 from face of ftg)

1
B2 := B bot.lower.2 + t wall + t −t
2 ftg wall
(
= 4.757 ft )

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 19 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

 B2 
e2 := max − l 2 , 0ft = 0.439 ft
 2 
B2
eallow.2 := = 1.189 ft (Within Middle Half of ftg per e2
4 AASHTO 11.6.3.3) Checke.2 := "OK" if ≤1 = "OK"
eallow.2

"NG" otherwise
Check Bearing Pressure

Per 11.11.4.3 Evaluate bearing pressure with respect to resistance calculated in 10.6.3. Per HITEC p. D24, use the
horizontal portion of the anchor at its base plus the footing width. Evaluate at the strength limit state. Use 100% of the
weight of the retained soil. When Live Load Surcharge is present, Strength I with maximum load factors for vertical loads
and horizontal loads controls. Include the effects of live load surcharge. Since lever arms are calculated from the front face
of the wall, must add to the eccentricity the distance between wall and toe of footing.

kip ⋅ ft
(
Resistingbrg.2 := 1.25 DCwall.2⋅ xDC.wall.2 + DCanchor.2⋅ xanchor.2 ... ) = 27.595⋅
ft
(
+ 1.35⋅ EV1a2 ⋅ xEV1a.2 + EV1b2 ⋅ xEV1b.2 + EV2 2 ⋅ xEV2.2 + EV3 2 ⋅ xEV3.2 + EV4 2 ⋅ xEV4.2 ... )
(
+ 1.35 EH1 2.vert⋅ xEH1.2 + EH2 2.vert⋅ xEH2.2 + EH3 2.vert⋅ xEH3.2 ... )
+ 1.75⋅ ( LSvert.2⋅ xLS.vert.2)

kip ⋅ ft
( )
Drivingbrg.2 := 1.35 EH1 2.hor⋅ yEH1.2 + EH2 2.hor⋅ yEH2.2 + EH3 2.hor⋅ yEH3.2 + 1.75LShor.2⋅ yLS.hor.2 = 9.554⋅
ft

kip
( ) (
ΣVbrg.2 := 1.25⋅ DCwall.2 + DCanchor.2 + 1.35⋅ EV1a2 + EV1b2 + EV2 2 + EV3 2 + EV4 2 ... = 8.623⋅
ft
)
(
+ 1.35⋅ EH1 2.vert + EH2 2.vert + EH3 2.vert + 1.75⋅ LSvert.2 ) ( )

  ( Resistingbrg.2 − Drivingbrg.2) 1  
 brg.2 
ΣV ⋅ + ( t ftg − t wall) + 1.25DCftg.2⋅ xDC.ftg.2
ΣVbrg.2 2
l brg.2 :=
    = 2.558 ft (Distance to resultant
ΣV + 1.25DC brg.2 ftg.2 from face of ftg)

 B2 
ebrg.2 := max − l brg.2 , 0ft = 0 ft
 2 

ΣVbrg.2
σfoot.2 := = 1.813⋅ ksf
B2 − 2 ⋅ ebrg.2 Eq. 11.6.3.2-1, Rectangular Distibution for
Foundations on soil

q R = 4.713⋅ ksf
qR
CheckBearing2 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
σfoot.2

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 20 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

External Stability Analysis at Anchor 3

Calculate Vertical Load s and Associated Lever Arms (All Lever Arms are f rom Po int "O")

kip
DCwall.3 := t wall⋅ h wall.3⋅ γc = 0.932⋅
ft
1
xDC.wall.3 := t wall = 0.5 ft
2

1 kip
( )(
EV1a3 := γs⋅ h backfill.3 − h wall.3 ⋅ d slope.3 = 0.787⋅
2 ft
)
2
xEV1a.3 := t wall + d slope.3 = 4.414 ft
3

kip
( )(
EV1b3 := γs⋅ h backfill.3 − h wall.3 ⋅ B bot.3 − d slope.3 = 0 ⋅
ft
)
1
xEV1b.3 := t wall + d slope.3 + (B
2 bot.3
)
− d slope.3 = 6.121 ft

kip
( )
EV2 3 := γs⋅ h wall.3 − 3.5ft ⋅ B bot.3 = 1.668⋅
ft
1
xEV2.3 := t wall + B bot.3 = 3.561 ft
2

EV3 3 := γs⋅ ( 3.5ft) ⋅  Bbot.lower.3 −  = 0.98⋅ kip


7in

 cos( 30deg)  ft

xEV3.3 := t wall +  Bbot.lower.3 − 


1 7in
2
 = 2.167 ft
cos( 30deg) 

EV4 3 := γs⋅ ⋅ 3.5ft⋅  W3 + 3ft + 5.375in −  Bbot.lower.3 −  = 0.444⋅ kip


1 7in
2 
( 
) 
cos( 30deg)  ft

xEV4.3 := t wall + Bbot.lower.3 + ⋅ W3 + 3ft + 5.375in −  B bot.lower.3 −  = 4.712 ft


1 7in

3   cos( 30deg) 

1 kip
DCanchor.3 := ⋅ ( 1740lbf ) if AnchorType3 = "B" = 0.503⋅
trib3 ft (See Anchor Geometry
( 2010lbf ) if AnchorType3 = "C" Drawing)

( 2285lbf ) if AnchorType3 = "D"

( 2550lbf ) if AnchorType3 = "E"

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 21 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

xanchor.3 := t wall + ( 2ft + 2.25in) if AnchorType3 = "B" = 3.734⋅ ft

( 2ft + 8.8125in) if AnchorType3 = "C"

( 3ft + 5.125in) if AnchorType3 = "D"

( 4ft + 0.0625in) if AnchorType3 = "E"

kip
LSvert.3 := q sur⋅ Bbot.3 − ( d traffic.3 ) if d traffic.3 < Bbot.3 = 0⋅ Used in bearing calcs only
ft
0 otherwise
1
xLS.vert.3 := t wall + d traffic.3 + B
2 bot.3
( )
− d traffic.3 = 10.32 ft

kip
DCftg.3 := γc⋅ t ftg⋅ h ftg = 1.5⋅
ft
t ftg
xDC.ftg.3 := = 1.25 ft Note: This moment arm is measured from the front toe of
2 the ftg since it is only used in bearing calculations.

Calculate Lateral Loads and Associated L ever Arms

1 2 kip
EH1 3.vert :=
2
( ) (
ka.wall⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.3 − 3.5ft ⋅ sin δwall = 0.312⋅ )
ft
1 2 kip
EH1 3.hor :=
2
( ) (
ka.wall⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.3 − 3.5ft ⋅ cos δwall = 0.7⋅
ft
)
xEH1.3 := t wall + Bbot.3 = 6.121 ft

1
yEH1.3 := 3.5ft + h (
3 backfill.3
− 3.5ft = 5.258 ft )

kip
( ) (
EH2 3.vert := ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.3 − 3.5ft ⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ sin δanchor − 30deg = −0.1⋅
ft
)
kip
( ) (
EH2 3.hor := ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ h backfill.3 − 3.5ft ⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ cos δanchor − 30deg = 0.401⋅
ft
)
1
xEH2.3 := t wall + B
2 bot.3
(
+ Bbot.lower.3 = 5.064 ft )
1
yEH2.3 := 3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft = 1.5 ft
2

1 2 kip
EH3 3.vert :=
2
( )
ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ sin δanchor − 30deg = −0.038⋅
ft

1 2 kip
EH3 3.hor :=
2
(
ka.anchor⋅ γs⋅ ( 4ft) ⋅ cos δanchor − 30deg = 0.152⋅ )ft

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 22 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

xEH3.3 := t wall + Bbot.lower.3 +  3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft tan( 30deg) = 4.488 ft


2
 3 
2
yEH3.3 := 3.5ft − ⋅ 4 ft = 10⋅ in
3

h wall.3 kip
LShor.3 := ( ka.wall⋅ qsur⋅ hbackfill.3)⋅ cos( δwall) if d traffic.3 <
2
= 0⋅
ft
0 otherwise

1
xLS.hor.3 := t wall + B (
2 bot.lower.3
+ Bbot.3 = 5.064 ft ) (Assumed for ease of calculation)

1
yLS.hor.3 := h backfill.3 = 4.388 ft
2

Check Sliding

Per AASHTO 11.11.4.2, Sliding shall be evaluated according to 10.6.3.4. Per 11.5.3, sliding shall be evaluated at the strength
limit state. Use minimum load factors for vertical loads and maximum load factors for horizontal loads. Assume the failure
plane is beneath the wall ftg, which will be grouted to the wall during construction. This is consistent with assumptions in the
HITEC report (page D24).

Resisting Forces

ϕτ := 0.9 AASHTO Table 10.5.5.2.2-1, "Precast on Sand" or "Soil on Soil"

kip
( ) (
ΣV3 := 0.9 DCwall.3 + DCanchor.3 + DCftg.3 + 1.0⋅ EV1a3 + EV1b3 + EV2 3 + EV3 3 + EV4 3 ... = 6.781⋅
ft
)
(
+ ηi ⋅ 1.50⋅ EH1 3.vert + EH2 3.vert + EH3 3.vert )
kip
( )
Rτ.3 := 0.8⋅ tan ϕftg ⋅ ΣV3 = 3.798⋅
ft AASHTO 10.6.3.4
kip
Rr.3 := ϕτ⋅ Rτ.3 = 3.419⋅
ft

Driving Forces

kip
 (  )
ΣHτ.3 := ηi ⋅ 1.50⋅ EH1 3.hor + EH2 3.hor + EH3 3.hor + 1.75LShor.3 = 1.878⋅
ft

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 23 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

R r.3
Checksliding.3 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
ΣHτ.3

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 24 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Check Overturning and Eccentricity

Per AASHTO 11.11.4.4, Overturning shall be evaluated according to 11.6.3.3. A maximum of 80% of the retained soil shall
be used to resist overturning. Per 11.6.3.3, evaluate overturning and eccentricity at the strength limit state using maximum
load factors for horizontal loads and minimum load factors for vertical loads. First, evaluate overturning about front base of
wall. If the wall passes the overturning check, the wing will not experience uplift with respect to the footing. Therefore
evaluate eccentricity at the bottom of the footing. The location of the resultant of the reaction forces shall be located within
the middle half of the base width (footing width plus anchor projection). Eccentricity is measured from the center of the
base width toward the stream side of the footing. Assume that a negative eccentricity (beyond the center of the base,
toward the backfill) is acceptable since this condition will engage passive earth pressures.

Resisting Forces

kip ⋅ ft
(
Resisting3 := 0.9 DCwall.3⋅ xDC.wall.3 + DCanchor.3⋅ xanchor.3 ... ) = 14.859⋅
ft
( )
+ 1.0⋅ 0.8⋅ EV1a3 ⋅ xEV1a.3 + EV1b3 ⋅ xEV1b.3 + EV2 3 ⋅ xEV2.3 + EV3 3 ⋅ xEV3.3 + EV4 3 ⋅ xEV4.3 ...
(
+ 1.50 EH1 3.vert⋅ xEH1.3 + EH2 3.vert⋅ xEH2.3 + EH3 3.vert⋅ xEH3.3 )

Driving Forces

kip ⋅ ft
( )
Driving3 := 1.50⋅ EH1 3.hor⋅ yEH1.3 + EH2 3.hor⋅ yEH2.3 + EH3 3.hor⋅ yEH3.3 + 1.75LShor.3⋅ yLS.hor.3 = 6.61⋅
ft

Resisting 3
CheckOT.3 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
Driving3

"NG" otherwise

Eccentricity of Resultant

kip
( ) (
ΣVe.3 := 0.9 DCwall.3 + DCanchor.3 + 1.0⋅ 0.8⋅ EV1a3 + EV1b3 + EV2 3 + EV3 3 + EV4 3 ... = 4.655⋅ )ft
(
+ 1.50 EH1 3.vert + EH2 3.vert + EH3 3.vert )

  ( Resisting3 − Driving3 ) 1  
ΣVe.3 ⋅  + ( t ftg − t wall) + 0.9DCftg.3⋅ xDC.ftg.3
ΣVe.3 2
l 3 :=
    = 2.236 ft (Distance to resultant
ΣV + 0.9DC e.3 ftg.3 from face of ftg)

1
B3 := B bot.lower.3 + t wall + t −t
2 ftg wall
(
= 4.757 ft )

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 25 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

 B3 
e3 := max − l 3 , 0ft = 0.143 ft
 2 
B3
eallow.3 := = 1.189 ft (Within Middle Half of ftg per e3
4 AASHTO 11.6.3.3) Checke.3 := "OK" if ≤1 = "OK"
eallow.3

"NG" otherwise
Check Bearing Pressure

Per 11.11.4.3 Evaluate bearing pressure with respect to resistance calculated in 10.6.3. Per HITEC p. D24, use the
horizontal portion of the anchor at its base plus the footing width. Evaluate at the strength limit state. Use 100% of the
weight of the retained soil. When Live Load Surcharge is present, Strength I with maximum load factors for vertical loads
and horizontal loads controls. Include the effects of live load surcharge. Since lever arms are calculated from the front face
of the wall, must add to the eccentricity the distance between wall and toe of footing.

kip ⋅ ft
(
Resistingbrg.3 := 1.25 DCwall.3⋅ xDC.wall.3 + DCanchor.3⋅ xanchor.3 ... ) = 22.99⋅
ft
(
+ 1.35⋅ EV1a3 ⋅ xEV1a.3 + EV1b3 ⋅ xEV1b.3 + EV2 3 ⋅ xEV2.3 + EV3 3 ⋅ xEV3.3 + EV4 3 ⋅ xEV4.3 ... )
(
+ 1.35 EH1 3.vert⋅ xEH1.3 + EH2 3.vert⋅ xEH2.3 + EH3 3.vert⋅ xEH3.3 ... )
+ 1.75⋅ ( LSvert.3⋅ xLS.vert.3)

kip ⋅ ft
( )
Drivingbrg.3 := 1.35 EH1 3.hor⋅ yEH1.3 + EH2 3.hor⋅ yEH2.3 + EH3 3.hor⋅ yEH3.3 + 1.75LShor.3⋅ yLS.hor.3 = 5.949⋅
ft

kip
( ) (
ΣVbrg.3 := 1.25⋅ DCwall.3 + DCanchor.3 + 1.35⋅ EV1a3 + EV1b3 + EV2 3 + EV3 3 + EV4 3 ... = 7.265⋅
ft
)
(
+ 1.35⋅ EH1 3.vert + EH2 3.vert + EH3 3.vert + 1.75⋅ LSvert.3 ) ( )

  ( Resistingbrg.3 − Drivingbrg.3) 1  
 brg.3 
ΣV ⋅ + ( t ftg − t wall) + 1.25DCftg.3⋅ xDC.ftg.3
ΣVbrg.3 2
l brg.3 :=
    = 2.717 ft (Distance to resultant
ΣV + 1.25DC brg.3 ftg.3 from face of ftg)

 B3 
ebrg.3 := max − l brg.3 , 0ft = 0 ft
 2 

ΣVbrg.3
σfoot.3 := = 1.527⋅ ksf
B3 − 2 ⋅ ebrg.3 Eq. 11.6.3.2-1, Rectangular Distibution for
Foundations on soil

q R = 4.713⋅ ksf
qR
CheckBearing3 := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
σfoot.3

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 26 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Check Wall Reinforcement

Assume the wall stem is cantilevered above the anchor. Use tallest wall section above anchor. Use maximum horizontal load
factors to calculate moments and shears. Use minimum load factor for axial compression.

Calculate Horizontal Loads and resp. Lever Arms at top of Anchor

h wall.internal := h wall.1 − 3.5ft = 5.109 ft

1 2 kip 1
EHwall := ka.wall⋅ γs⋅ h wall.internal = 0.718⋅ yEH.wall := h wall.internal = 1.703 ft
2 ft 3
1
1 kip yLS.wall := h wall.internal = 2.554 ft
LSwall := 0 if d traffic.1 ≥ ⋅ h wall.1 = 0.562⋅ 2
2 ft
(ka.wall⋅ qsur⋅ hwall.internal) otherwise

kip ⋅ ft
(
Muwall := ηi ⋅ 1.5⋅ EHwall⋅ yEH.wall + 1.75LSwall⋅ yLS.wall = 4.35⋅
ft
)
kip
(
Vuwall := ηi ⋅ 1.5EHwall + 1.75LSwall = 2.062⋅
ft
)
kip
(
Nuwall := −ηi ⋅ 0.9⋅ γc⋅ t wall⋅ h wall.internal = −0.69⋅ )
ft

Check Moment Capacity

barwall := 5 swall := 12in coverwall := 1.5in

b w := 1ft

barwall
diamwall := in = 0.625⋅ in
8
2
π⋅ diamwall in 2
Aswall := ⋅ 12 = 0.307⋅ in
4 swall

diamwall
d wall := t wall − coverwall − = 10.187⋅ in
2

ϕmoment := 0.90 Per AASHTO 5.5.4.2.1

ϕshear := 0.90 Per AASHTO 5.5.4.2.1

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 27 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Verify that fy can be substituted for fs in the equations of 5.7.3.2. This is allowed when
c
≤ 0.60 .
ds

Aswall⋅ fy
cwall := = 0.451⋅ in Simplified equation 5.7.3.1.2-4
0.85⋅ fc⋅ β1 ⋅ b w

cwall
= 0.044 This is less than 0.60 therefore fy can be substituted for fs
d wall

awall := β1 ⋅ cwall = 0.361⋅ in

 awall 
Mnwall := Aswall⋅ fy⋅  d wall − 
 2 
Mrwall := ϕmoment ⋅ Mnwall = 13.816⋅ kip ⋅ ft

Muwall⋅ b w = 4.35⋅ kip ⋅ ft Mrwall


CheckWallFlexure := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
Muwall⋅ b w

"NG" otherwise

Check Minimum Flexural Reinforcement (5.7.3.3.2)

fr := 0.24⋅ fc⋅ ksi = 0.537⋅ ksi AASHTO 5.4.2.6

1 3 3 4
Ig.wall := ⋅ b w⋅ t wall = 1.728 × 10 ⋅ in
12
t wall Distance from centroid to extreme tension fibers.
yt.wall := = 6 ⋅ in
2 Conservatively ignore reinforcement.

Ig.wall 3
Sc.wall := = 288 ⋅ in
yt.wall

γ3 := 0.67 0.67 = Factor for Grade 60 ASTM A615 rebar

γ1 := 1.2
1.2 = Factor for precast segmental structures

M cr.wall := γ3 ⋅ γ1 ⋅ Sc.wall⋅ fr = 10.355⋅ kip ⋅ ft


Simplified AASHTO Eq 5.7.3.3.2-1

1.33Muwall⋅ b w = 5.785⋅ kip ⋅ ft


CheckMinSteelWall := (
"OK" if Mrwall ≥ min 1.33Muwall⋅ b w , M cr.wall ) = "OK"

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 28 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Shear Resistance at Bottom of Wall (Section 5.8.3.4.2)

The section contains less than the minimum transverse reinforcement specified in 5.8.2.5,
therefore use equation 5.8.3.4.2-2 to determine the longitudinal strain effect factor (β) at
the location of maximum shear.

(
Mu := max Muwall , Vuwall⋅ d wall ) In the eqtn below Mu shall not be less than Vu⋅ d v

Mu
+ 0.5Nuwall + Vuwall
d wall
ξs_wall := ⋅ bw 1000⋅ ξ s_wall = 0.77 (5.8.3.4.2-4)
Es⋅ Aswall

sx_wall := d wall

1.38in
sxe_wall := sx_wall⋅ = 10.187⋅ in
Aggregatediam + 0.63in (5.8.3.4.2-5)

 4.8 ⋅ 51  (5.8.3.4.2-2)


βwall :=  1 + 750⋅ ξ  s  = 3.157
 s_wall 
 39 + xe_wall 
 1in 

Θwall := 29deg + 3500deg⋅ ξ s_wall = 31.691⋅ deg (5.8.3.4.2-3)

( )
Vnwall := min 0.25⋅ fc⋅ b w⋅ d wall , 0.0316⋅ βwall⋅ fc⋅ ksi⋅ b w⋅ d wall = 27.267⋅ kip
(5.8.3.3)

Vrwall := ϕshear ⋅ Vnwall = 24.54⋅ kip

Vuwall⋅ b w = 2.062⋅ kip Vr wall


CheckWallShear := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
Vuwall⋅ b w

"NG" otherwise

Check Crack Control in Section 5.7.3.4

kip ⋅ ft
(
Ms wall := ηi ⋅ 1.0⋅ EHwall⋅ yEH.wall + 1.0LSwall⋅ yLS.wall = 2.66⋅ ) ft

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 29 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

kip
(
Nswall := −ηi ⋅ 1.0⋅ γc⋅ t wall⋅ h wall.internal = −0.766⋅
ft
)

 Ms wall t wall  
ewall := max + d wall −  , 1.15⋅ d wall = 0.976 ft
 Nswall 2
 

  ewall  
j wall := min0.74 + .1 ⋅   , 0.9 = 0.855
  d wall  
1
i wall := = 3.898
 d wall 
1 −  j wall ⋅ 
ewall
 
 t wall 
Ms wall + Nswall⋅  d wall − 
fss wall :=
 2  = 2.756⋅ ksi Stress in Reinforcement at Service
Aswall⋅ j wall ⋅ i wall⋅ d wall ft Limit State

d c_wall := t wall − d wall = 1.813⋅ in

d c_wall
βs := 1 + = 1.254
(
0.7⋅ t wall − d c_wall )
γe := 1.00 exposure factor

kip
700 ⋅ γe
in
smax := − 2 ⋅ d c_wall = 198.859 ⋅ in
βs⋅ fss wall⋅ b w

CheckMaxSpacing := "OK" if swall ≤ smax = "OK"

"NG" otherwise

Check Minimum Bar Spacing in Section 5.10.3.1.2:

(
smin := max diamwall , 1.33Aggregatediam , 1in = 1 ⋅ in )
CheckMinSpacing := "OK" if swall ≥ smin = "OK"

"NG" otherwise

Check Maximum Bar Spacing in Section 5.10.3.2:

(
smax := min 1.5⋅ t wall , 18in = 18⋅ in ) CheckMaxSpacing := "OK" if swall ≤ smax = "OK"

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 30 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Check Anchor Attachment to Wall


Check Moment Capacity of Connection Bars
Conservatively assume the entire wall is cantilevered about the footing, therefore consider only driving moments. Use total
loads instead of loads per foot. Use 100% of soil weight. Must determine controlling anchor, since tributary width is
variable, not necessarily the anchor at the tallest wall. Assume only top four connection bars resist tension. This
assumption is consistent with HITEC p.D28.

( )
Muanchor := max Drivingbrg.1⋅ trib1 , Drivingbrg.2⋅ trib2 , Drivingbrg.3⋅ trib3 = 73.214⋅ kip ⋅ ft

baranchor := 5 size of bar

bar anchor
diamanchor := in = 0.625⋅ in
8
π 2 2
Asanchor := ⋅ diamanchor = 0.307⋅ in
4

n := 6 Number of bars in tension

b anchor := t stem = 6 ⋅ in thickness of anchor stem

h stem := 3ft + 6in height of anchor stem

d anchor := 30.5in distance from centroid of tension reinforcement extreme compression fiber.

Verify that fy can be substituted for fs in the equations of 5.7.3.2. This is allowed when
c
≤ 0.60 .
ds

n ⋅ Asanchor ⋅ fy
canchor := = 5.414⋅ in Simplified equation 5.7.3.1.2-4
0.85⋅ fc⋅ β1 ⋅ b anchor

canchor
= 0.178 This is less than 0.60 therefore fy can be substituted for fs
d anchor

aanchor := β1 ⋅ canchor = 4.331⋅ in

 aanchor 
Mnanchor := n ⋅ Asanchor ⋅ fy⋅  d anchor − 
 2 
Mranchor := ϕmoment⋅ Mnanchor = 234.708 ⋅ kip ⋅ ft

Muanchor = 73.214⋅ kip ⋅ ft Mranchor


CheckAnchorFlexure := "OK" if ≥1 = "OK"
Muanchor

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 31 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Check Minimum Flexural Reinforcement (5.7.3.3.2)

fr = 0.537⋅ ksi AASHTO 5.4.2.6

1 3 4 4
Ig.anchor := ⋅ t stem⋅ h stem = 3.704 × 10 ⋅ in
12
h stem
yt.anchor := = 1.75 ft Distance from centroid to extreme tension fibers.
2 Conservatively ignore reinforcement.
Ig.anchor 3 3
Sc.anchor := = 1.764 × 10 ⋅ in
yt.anchor

γ3 := 0.67 0.67 = Factor for Grade 60 ASTM A615 rebar

γ1 := 1.2
1.2 = Factor for precast segmental structures

M cr.anchor := γ3 ⋅ γ1 ⋅ Sc.anchor⋅ fr = 63.426⋅ kip ⋅ ft


Simplified AASHTO Eq 5.7.3.3.2-1

1.33Muanchor ⋅ b w = 97.375 ft⋅ kip ⋅ ft

CheckMinSteelAnchor := (
"OK" if Mranchor ≥ min 1.33Muanchor , M cr.anchor ) = "OK"

"NG" otherwise

Check Minimum Steel for Temperat ure and Shrin kage (11.6.1.5.1 & 5.10.8)

  2 2 1.30⋅ b anchor ⋅ h stem  2


Asmin.anchor := max0.11 , min0.60  = 0.6⋅ in
in in
,
 ft  ft fy  ft
  2 ⋅ ( b anchor + h stem) ⋅ 
  ksi 

2
Asmin.anchor⋅ h stem = 2.1⋅ in

2
Asanchor ⋅ ( n + 2 ) = 2.454⋅ in Account for extra two bars in compression face

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 32 of 33


Designed By: PJL Weaver Bros, #3935
Checked By: WW3
Date Printed: 8/9/2013 Joppa Hill Rd
Bedford, NH

Check Hook Development of Connection Steel in Wall

Per 5.10.2, A standard hook with a 180 degree bend shall have a 4*db extension, but not less than 2.5 inches. Per
5.12.3, Cover beyond free end of bar shall be 2 inches.

38.0diamanchor
l hb := = 10.621⋅ in Basic development length for a Grade 60 bar with a standard hook
 fc  (AASHTO 5.11.2.4.1)
 
 ksi 

Modification Factors to be applied to the Basic Development Length (AASHTO 5.11.2.4.2)

M strength := 1 Increase by fy/60 for yield strength greater than 60ksi

M cover := 0.7
0.7 if side cover normal to plane of hook is at least 2.5 inches AND
Cover beyond hook is at least 2.0in

M stirrups := 1.0 0.8 if hook is enclose in with ties or stirrups as specified in 5.11.2.4.2

M As := 1.0 Conservatively assume entire area of steel provided is required.

M lightweight := 1.0 1.3 if lightweight concrete is used.

M epoxy := 1.0 1.2 if epoxy rebar is used.

M := M strength⋅ M cover⋅ M stirrups⋅ M As⋅ M lightweight⋅ M epoxy = 0.7

( )
l dh := max 6in , 8 ⋅ diamanchor , M ⋅ l hb = 7.435⋅ in

t wall.min := coverwall + l dh = 8.935⋅ in


CheckWall.Thickness := "OK" if t wall ≥ t wall.min = "OK"

"NG" otherwise

S:\PROJECTS\Weaver Brothers\Bedford, NH - Joppa Hill Road\Design Page 33 of 33

You might also like