You are on page 1of 2

[Date]

[NAME OF THE VALIDATOR]


[Position]
[Name of Office]
[Address]

Dear Sir/Ma’am;

Greetings of Peace and Solidarity!

We are fourth-year students taking up a Bachelor of Science in Criminology at Holy


Angel University’s College of Criminal Justice Education and Forensics who is currently
formulating a thesis entitled "THE PREVENTIVE MEASURES OF THE ANTI-CYBERCRIME
GROUP TOWARDS THE PREVALENCE OF IDENTITY THEFT INCIDENTS" for our
Criminological Research course.

Regarding this, I would like to request your assistance with the research questionnaire's
validation. A structured survey questionnaire was designed to collect the necessary data for the
investigation.

We are looking forward for your response regarding this matter. Thank you very much,
and may God continue to bless you and your family!

Respectfully yours,

CHANTENGCO, HAIDIE L.

CHANTENGCO, JOHN NIKKO S.

DAVID, LEI ANGEL L.

MAGLAQUI, YSHI MAE P.

ROQUE, ELGIME S.

[Name]
Research Adviser

Noted by:

MR. EMANUEL C. MANAHAN, RCrim


Program Coordinator, Criminology
Validation Form

Instruction: Kindly validate the rating for each question.

Summary of the Questionnaire Evaluation Content Validation


Rating Weighted
5 4 3 2 1 DER
Item Mean
The direction given are clear in all
1. section of the data gathering
instrument
2. Each item is clearly stated
Each item is readable; the items are
3.
easily read
Each item is attractive to read and
4.
good spacing is observed
The data gathering instrument is
5. comprehensive; it covers all area that
are important in the study
Each item is focused on a particular
6.
thought or idea
The items are objective; the response
7. to be elicited are neither
biased nor reactive
The items formulated in accordance to
8 the explicit/ implicit
objective of the study
The items do not overlap with each
9. other, no duplication of items is
observed
A
W
M
Comments:

LEGEND
Rate Numerical Evaluation Descriptive Equivalent
5 4.20 -5.00 Highly Valid
4 3.40-4.19 Valid
3 2.60-3.39 Moderately Valid
2 1.80-2.59 Fairly Valid
1 1.00-1.79 Not Valid

Evaluator:
Signature over Printed name

You might also like