Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

ACTIVITY DOCUMENTATION REPORTS

Part 1 Background Information

A. Title of the Activity

Winning Education through Continuous Professional Career & Development:
School-Based Mid-year Performance Review & Evaluation & In-Service
Training for teaching Personnel for the year 2024

B. Date
January 24, 25, 26, 29, & 30, 2024

C. Venue
Grade 7 Classroom, Elena M. Mipaña National High School

D. Rationale of the Program/Activity

Pursuant to the released DepEd Order No. 022, s. 2023 re Implementing
Guidelines on the School Calendar and Activities for the School Year 2023-2024
which enable the school and community learning centers to implement school
activities and maximize instructional time in cognizance of the goals and
objectives of the DepEd MATATAG Agenda effectively and efficiently. According to
It is noticeably noted the series of activities to be conducted within the
specified school year. One of those activities is the conduct of professional
development for teachers specifically the Midyear Performance Review and
Evaluation (MPRE) and the School-Based In-Service Training (INSET). The five-day
midyear break will be used for reviewing the performances of the teachers and
the staff issues and concerns. In addition, the week-long activity will evaluate the
school’s progress in implementing the educational school’s programs, projects,
and activities (PPAs) through cooperative efforts.
Relative to the week-long activity, the Elena M. Mipaña National High
School wants to intensify the implementation of SLAC which fully supports the
continuing professional development of its teaching personnel based on the
principle of lifelong learning. This inspired the school to intensify and encourage
all teaching personnel to engage into active teaching and learning process through
enhanced educational programs. This is to help improve teachers on the way they
extend inputs and learning’s to the learners and on the delivery of services and
strategies of the interventions to increase learning outcomes.
With the integration of School-based Learning Action Cell (SLAC), the school
seeks to review the performances of the teaching personnel through midyear
performance review and evaluation and in-service training in order to determine
whether they are functioning their roles and responsibilities in line with the KRAs
and Objectives in the RPMS-PPST and to the address educational gaps within the
school through collective efforts.
With this, the Elena M. Mipaña National High School will conduct School-
Based Midyear Performance Review and Evaluation (MPRE) and In-Service
Training (INSET) for the school year 2023-2024.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
E. Objectives of the Activity

Terminal Objective:

To conduct School-Based Midyear Performance Review & Evaluation

and In-service Training for the teaching personnel.

Enabling Objectives:

1. Review the performances of the teachers within the first two

quarters of the school year;
2. Evaluate the school’s progress in implementing the
educational programs, projects, and activities through contextualized
monitoring and evaluation tools; and
3. Present individual best practices and innovations through
collective and cooperative efforts.

F. Expected Outcome and Results

Individual Packages indicating the daily activities with

written narrative or reflection
Accomplished Midyear Review Form and
Performance Monitoring and Commitment Form
MPRE & INSET attachments with Accomplishment Report and Photos

D. Summary Profile of Participants

Demographics Frequency N Percent %

Gender
Male 4 40%
Female 6 60%
Total 8 100%
Positions
Teacher I-III 9 90%
Master Teacher I-III 0 0%
Administrative Officer II 1 10
Total 10 100%
Age Category
18-25 6 60%
26-32 1 10%
33-39 1 10%
40 above 2 20%
Total 10 100%
Educational Attainment
Bachelor’s Degree 3 30%
Master’s Degree 7 70%
PhD Degree 0 0%
Total 10 100%
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
Part II Highlights of the Activity

A. Preliminary Activities

For the pre-implementation of the activity, all the materials were

quality-assured including the session guides, slide decks, pre/post-tests,
and curriculum vitae ensuring that the Learning and Development design
was approved.

Before the session proper, there was a registration proper following the
template provided by the Division. Igniting the spirit of patriotism, the activity
started with the Singing of the Philippine National Anthem, followed by the
QMS Opening Prayer, Regional and Sarangani Hymns, and the Reading of
the Quality Policy Statement.

Afterwards, the School Head gave the purpose of the activity and the
Overview of the MPRE & INSET 2024 to the teacher-participants wherein
they were guided about what to expect at the end of the activity.

B. Key Learning and Output (per module/session)

After the 5-day MPRE & INSET 2024, all speakers were able to
present their respective topics with brilliance and meaningful inputs that
were beneficial for the participants to perform their roles and
responsibilities. Topics were anchored to the released memorandum of
the Department of Education and the approved School-based Learning
Action Cell Plan of the school. Along with the discussion, speakers
distributed pretest materials in the beginning and posttest materials
after the talk wherein they were rated using the session facilitator
evaluation tool by the teacher-participants.

C. Issues and Recommendations

Issue/Concern Recommendations/ Responsible
Agreements Person/Office
Power supply interruptions Inform the SOCOTECO II School Head
Office regarding the problem
through the letter.

Congested topics in a day Limit the speaking time of Resource Speakers

the speakers provided that
the purpose of giving inputs
is not compromised

D. Synthesis and Closing

Elena M. Mipaña National High School (EMMNHS) concluded the MPRE

cum INSET 2024 face-to-face with the School Head and all the teachers through
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
their assigned topics. In the first session, we visited the AIP and identified the
unimplemented PPAs and their bottlenecks. Then we made an Action Plan for all
the unimplemented PPAs.
In the second session, the speaker reviews the teacher’s RPMS and
evaluates the 1st-semester performance based on the gathered MOVs. The
teachers realized that there are needed things to comply with and work out to
gain the Outstanding Rating.
In the third session, the speaker presented the result of Quarter 1 & 2
consolidated MPS/GPA of the learner’s Grade 7 to Grade 10. We discussed the
possible reasons. Then the speaker reviewed the legal basis for the classroom
assessment which is DO no. 8, s. 2015.
The fourth session was all about the Microsoft 365 Productivity Online
Training through DepEd Philippines. To train and make the teachers familiar with
the tools they’ll likely use for the years to come. Like Microsoft Word, PowerPoint,
Excel, and Teams, while building future-ready skills, like problem-solving and
collaboration.
Furthermore, on the fifth session School-based INSET Learner Diversity
and Student Inclusion. To make sure that all the teachers have one mind and
approach that ensures all learners have equal access to quality learning
regardless of their learning abilities, challenges, or background.
Finally, the last topic was the curriculum contextualization, localization,
and indigenization. The speaker emphasized that contextualization means
focusing on teaching and learning directly on concrete application. While
indigenization on the other hand refers to the process of enhancing curriculum
competencies, education resources and teaching learning process in relation to
the bio-geographical, historical, and socio-cultural context of the learner’s
community.
Though these last five days have been physically and mentally
exhausting, there's nothing more satisfying than having the love of teaching
work.

Prepared by: Checked and Reviewed by:

ARTHUR B. BESANA ARACELI J. DINOPOL

School Head SEPS - SMME

Noted:

MA. SHIRLEY M. CARDINAL

SGOD Chief

Approved by:

RUTH L. ESTACIO PhD, CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

Part III Annexes

A. M&E Analysis (Activity Evaluation Result)

(Based on the results of the End-of-Program Evaluation) Analysis should
include:

Results from the participants’ evaluation of the program

Mean Qualitative
Indicator
Rating Description
1. Meeting the learning objectives and participant
4 Excellent
expectations
2. Relevance of the activity/program to your job. 4 Excellent
3. Presentation Materials 4 Excellent
4. Methodologies 4 Excellent
5. Opportunities to Participate 4 Excellent
6. Time Management 3.13 Very Good
7. Program Management Team Performance 4 Excellent
8. Learning Facilitators / Trainers / Resource Speakers
4 Excellent
Performance
9. Venue 3.13 Very Good
10. Meals 4 Excellent
Overall Mean Rating
Grading scale for the qualitative rating value:
3.50-4.00 = Excellent;
2.50-3.45 = Very Good;
1.50-2.45 = Fair;
0-1.49 = Needs Improvement

● Results from participants’ evaluation of the Learning Facilitators (LF) /

Resource Speakers Performance

Name of LF/ Topic Mean Qualitative Strong Points Points for

Resource Speaker Rating Description Improvement
Arthur B. Besana AIP Review and making 3.98 Excellent The speaker The technical
of Action Plan expressed ideas part of
clearly and presenting the
exhibited slide.
mastery of the
topic.
Re-Orientation on the 4.00 Excellent The speaker is The phasing
RPMS Cycle: Phase II: very interactive was fast.
Performance Mentoring with the
and Coaching participants and
shows mastery
of the topic.
Jay Ismael B. Integrating HOTS into 3.95 Excellent The speaker The technical
Macadaag the lens of teaching delivered the side of the
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
and learning cum Safe lesson with presentation.
Spaces Act (Republic enthusiasm and
Act No. 11313) engaged
participants in
the discussion.
Khiara Mylene S. Differentiated 3.80 Excellent The speaker Be confident
Dalungdong Instruction into exhibited enough when
Teaching-Learning mastery of the others interrupt
(Part II) cum Policy topic. during the
Guidelines on the discussion.
Implementation of the
Comprehensive
Sexuality Education
(DepEd Order No. 31,
s. 2018)
Phoebe Joy C. Child Rights Policy: 3.93 Excellent The speaker There were
Mericullo Adopting the Rights- expressed ideas slides that were
Based Education clearly and incorrect.
Framework in observed
Philippine Basic appropriate
Education (DepEd attire.
Order No. 31, s. 2022)
cum DepEd School
Forms
Zyrah T. Cartel Leadership Training 3.93 Excellent` The speaker Technical side
cum National Learning processed of the
Camp Program questions and presentation.
responded to
deeper learning.

● Results from participants’ Comments, Significant Observations and

Reflections

1. What are the facilitating factors that contributed to the success of the
participants’ learning experience?
● Active participation leads to the success of the activity. Everyone is
cooperating toward achieving the set goals of the program. [Arthur B.
Besana]
● The facilitating factors that contributed to the success of my learning
are the ideas that are clearly presented to us by the mastery of the
resource speakers to the different topics. [Shaina J. Talangin]
● The facilitating factors that contributed to the success of my learning is
the strategies and a productive input. [Kenneth George V. Fernandez]

2. What are the hindering factors that contributed to the success of the
participants’ learning experience?
● Lack of access to electricity
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

● Time management and the venue preparation

3. Take Aways / New Knowledge Gained / Reflections from the Sessions

● I am refreshed with the importance of PPST, as well as the different
domains and strands. [Jay Ismael B. Macadaag]
● I will apply all the domains in order to offer quality education to any
learners. [Phoebe Joy C. Mericullo]
● Understanding RBE framework and the Rights of every child. [Khiara
Mylene S. Dalungdong]

4. Areas for Improvement, Suggestions and Recommendations for Similar

Engagements in the Future
● Time Management

● Venue

5. Compliments and Good Remarks

● Learning is fun when there is unity and teamwork.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

B. Summarized Pre & Post-Test Results

MPRE ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION

120

100 96 95 94 94 96 97
90 93

80

60

PRE-TEST
40 POST TEST

20

0
A Z L A
AN DE ONG GI
N
LL
O
TE AAG OS
S N N U R
BE NA
D A
RI
C CA AD RM
R UNG AL E AC HE
T
FE L M M
DA

As shown in the above graph, it displays the accumulated scores attained

by the teacher-participants after the five-day MPRE & INSET 2024. For the pre-
test results, Participant 7 got the highest score and followed by the Participant 6.
Participants 4 and 5 got the lowest scores in the pre-test. On the other hand,
Participant 7 maintained the top spot as the highest score in the post-test results
and followed by the Participant 3. Participants 4 and 5 still got the lowest scores
in the post-test results. Provided with the results of the participants, it is cleary
noted that there is slightly increase of the results from the pre-test activities into
the post-test activities.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

C. Attendance Sheets
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

D. 2024 School INSET Participant Reporting Tool

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

E. Approved L&D Program Design

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

F. Approved M&E Plan for L&D / PD Program

MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) PLAN

For Professional Development Programs / Learning and Development (L&D)
PD Program Title: MIDYEAR PERFORMANCE REVIEW & EVALUATION AND IN-SERVICE TRAINING FOR
TEACHERS
Implementation Dates: January 24, 25, 26, 29, & 30, 2024
Venue: ELENA M. MIPAÑA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Program Manager/School Head ARTHUR B. BESANA
Target Learners/Participants 9 TEACHERS

Declaration:
I hereby declare the information provided in this application is true and correct and there have been no misleading statements,
omission of any relevant facts nor any misinterpretation made.

I agree that the Schools Division of Sarangani to be the co-owner of all the data gathered and the copyright of any publication of the
use of these data.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

G. Photo Documentation