Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(AE29202)
Aerodynamics Lab – I (AE29202) * Images are taken from various web sources 2
Aerodynamic Forces
• Lift and drag forces can be found by integrating pressure
and wall-shear stress.
Aerodynamics Lab – I (AE29202) * Images are taken from various web sources 4
Pressure Distribution Comparison with Circular Cylinder
Aerodynamics Lab – I (AE29202) * Images are taken from various web sources 5
Report Format
1. Aim of the Experiments
2. Objectives
3. Experimental Procedure
4. Observations
5. Results and Discussion
6. Conclusions
7. Questionnaires
8. Ansys Fluent Simulations (optional)
Aerodynamics Lab – I (AE29202) * Images are taken from various web sources 7
Observation Table
Settling
For α = 0° Chamber
Group - 3 and 4
Pressure inside the settling chamber (i.e. air box) = P 0 = 312 mm of H2O
Pressure at the inlet of wind tunnel (i.e. test section) = P ∞ = 260 mm of H2O
Tap
Static pressure,
Dynamic pressure =
Coefficient of pressure,
Coefficient of pressure,
Repeat for α = 0° and 90°
Ps Ps - P∞ Cp,exp = (Ps - P∞) / (P0 - P∞)
Loacation 0.5 × ρ × U2∞ = P 0 - P ∞ Panel Method
(mm of water) (Experimental)
0 310
10 308
20 298
30 278
40 250
50 222
60 202
70 192
80 194
90 200
100 200
-90 200
-80 200
-70 200
-60 198
-50 198
-40 198
-30 198
-20 198 Aerodynamics Lab – I (AE29202)
-10 198 * Images are taken from various web sources 8
and pressure coefficient,
Sample Calculation
Settling where D is the cylinder diameter. We therefore have,
The drag on a real cylinder is, of course, not zero and can be estimated from a measured
Chamber
pressure distribution as follows. Consider an element of the cylinder surface of length
ds = rd as shown in fgure. The force per unit span on the element due to a pressure
normal to the element is
The drag component of this force is the component acting in the direction of the free-
stream velocity
the second integral is zero, giving,
The integral of this around the cylinder circumference gives the total drag on the
cylinder per unit span d.
This integration can be done numerically using Simpson's or the trapezium rule or by
plotting Cpcos vs. and measuring the area under the curve. Note that is measured
in radians.
The above estimate of Cd takes account only of the pressure drag on the cylinder. In
Now, it is conventional to work in terms of the non-dimensional drag coefficient,
calculating this, however, it is fairly accurate, the main source of error probably being
the numerical integration.
Similarly, lift coefficient can be calculated by taking other direction pressure force
component.
and pressure coefficient,
Aerodynamics Lab – I (AE29202) * Images are taken from various web sources 9
where D is the cylinder diameter. We therefore have,
Plots to Include in the Report
Settling
Chamber
1. Coefficient of Pressure vs Tap Location at different AoA (Both Potential
Flow Theory and Experimental)
2. Lift coefficient vs AoA (Both Potential Flow Theory and Experimental)
3. Drag Coefficient AoA (Both Potential Flow Theory and Experimental)
4. Comparison of experimental results with ANSYS Fluent Simulation
(Optional)
Aerodynamics Lab – I (AE29202) * Images are taken from various web sources 10
Questionnaire
1. Why the coefficient of pressure (Cp) distribution seen in the experiment is
significantly different from potential flow theory?
2. What are sources of error in your experiments and comment how can it be
avoided.
3. Compare the drag force of circular cylinder and elliptical cylinder from
your experiments? Specify the Re in both the experiments.