Video Lecture Guidelines

Objective:

The objective of this performance task is to create a short video lecture that
effectively communicates a specific concept in MAPEH. The video should be
engaging, clear, and informative, catering to the elementary students’
understanding level.

Duration:

The duration of the video lecture should be between 5 to 10 minutes.

Content Guidelines:

Choose a Topic: Select a specific concept in MAPEH 7 – 10 or PEH 1-4 in SHS.

Ensure that the topic is suitable for the target audience's level of understanding.

Outline the Lecture: Plan the structure of the lecture, including an introduction to
the topic, an explanation of key concepts and examples, and a conclusion
summarizing the main points covered.

Visual Aids: Utilize visual aids such as diagrams, graphs, or animations to

enhance understanding. Visuals should complement the explanation and help
illustrate key points.

Examples and Demonstrations: Include relevant examples and demonstrations to

illustrate how the mathematical concept or technique is applied in practice. Use
both numerical and real-world examples where possible.

Clarity and Organization: Ensure that the content is well-organized and

presented in a logical sequence. Clearly label different sections and transitions
within the video.

Technical Guidelines:

Video Quality: Record the high-quality video (at least 720p) with clear audio. Use a
stable camera or screen recording software to avoid shaky footage.

Presentation Style: Choose a presentation style that suits the topic and your
personality. You may opt for a talking head format, voice-over slides, or a
combination of both.

Editing: Edit the video to remove any mistakes, pauses, or irrelevant content. Add
transitions, captions, and visual effects as needed to enhance the overall
presentation.

Submission Guidelines:

Submit the video lecture along with any supplementary materials (such as slides or
handouts) if applicable.

Submit the video lecture by March 09, 2024, via Google Drive.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1isLpPZNsmagPej3NMO77NJ-UexmAjvTN?
usp=sharing

Page 1 of 3
Evaluation Criteria:

Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)

The explanation is The explanation is The explanation is The explanation is
exceptionally clear, clear and effectively somewhat clear but unclear, confusing,
Clarity and precise, and communicates the may lack precision or ineffective in
effectiveness effectively mathematical or leave some conveying the
of communicates the concept or aspects of the mathematical
explanation mathematical technique, with concept unclear to concept or
concept or minor room for the audience. technique.
technique. improvement.
The presentation The presentation The presentation The presentation
style is highly style is engaging style is somewhat style is dull,
engaging, capturing and holds the engaging but may monotonous, or
the audience's audience's lack consistency or fails to engage the
Engagement attention attention for the fail to captivate the audience effectively
and throughout the most part. Some audience's interest throughout the
presentation video lecture. The minor consistently. video lecture.
style presenter effectively improvements
uses storytelling, could enhance
humor, or engagement.
interactive elements
to maintain interest.
The lecture is The lecture is well- The lecture is The lecture is
meticulously organized, with a somewhat poorly organized,
organized, with a clear structure that organized but may with a lack of clear
clear and logical effectively guides lack clarity in structure or
Organization structure that the audience structure or coherence, making
and structure guides the audience through the transitions between it difficult for the
of the lecture through the content content. Minor sections, leading to audience to follow
seamlessly. improvements in some confusion for the content.
Transitions between transitions or the audience.
sections are smooth structure could
and coherent. enhance clarity.
Visual aids and Visual aids and Visual aids and Visual aids and
examples are examples are well- examples are examples are
exceptionally well- incorporated, somewhat poorly integrated
incorporated, contributing to integrated into the or irrelevant to the
enhancing understanding and lecture but may be topic, hindering
Use of visual understanding and illustrating key inconsistent or less understanding and
aids and illustrating key points effectively. relevant to the failing to illustrate
examples points effectively. Some minor topic, detracting key points
They complement improvements from overall effectively.
the explanation could further understanding.
seamlessly and are enhance their
relevant to the relevance and
topic. clarity.
Technical The video The video exhibits The video's The video's
quality of the demonstrates good technical technical quality is technical quality is
video excellent technical quality, with clear somewhat adequate poor, with frequent
quality, with high- visuals and audio, but may suffer from glitches, low-
resolution visuals, and minimal occasional glitches, resolution visuals,
clear audio, and technical issues. poor resolution, or or significant audio
smooth transitions. Minor audio issues, problems, making it
It is free from improvements impacting the difficult for the

Page 2 of 3
Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)
technical glitches or could enhance the viewing experience. audience to engage
distractions. overall viewing with the content.
experience.

Page 3 of 3