Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Declaration: By submitting this assessment (Parts 1 – 4) for marking I declare that it is entirely my own work. I understand that falsely claiming that
the work is my own is malpractice and can lead to NEBOSH imposing severe penalties (see the NEBOSH Malpractice Policy for further information).
Important note: You must refer to the document ‘Unit IG2: risk assessment – Guidance and information for learners and Learning Partners’ while
completing all parts of this assessment. Your Learning Partner should provide you with a copy, but it can also be downloaded from the relevant
resources section for this qualification on the NEBOSH website.
Part 1: Background
Hazard category and Who might be harmed What are you already What further controls/actions are Timescales for Responsible
hazard and how? doing? required? further actions person’s job
to be title
completed
(within …)
1. Manual Workers that are involved Workers carried the 1. Overhead cranes installation, 1. 2 Months Plant
Handling: in the transportation, weight in groups rather forklifts, and other mechanical aids Manager (1,2)
packaging, stacking, than individually to to minimize manual handling. 2. 1.5 Month
The physical activity of unloading, and loading of reduce the danger of 2. Conveyors installation to improve Department
lifting, pulling, pushing as heavy cement bags. harm. manual handling. 3. 2 Weeks Heads (3)
well as handling heavy 3. To reduce repetitive movements,
bags of cement and or Workers being observed in Workers are given job rotation programs need to be 4. 3 Weeks Manager HSE
other material is observed the MLCF were carrying good-grip safety gloves. implemented. (4)
in the cement plant. heavy loads by manually, 4. Manual handling training 5. 5 days
These kinds of activities which is the cause of introduction to train all workers on Manager
may lead to physical different health issues like proper lifting tasks. Stores (5)
injuries specifically back musculoskeletal disorders, 5. Safety shoes must be provided to
bone injury. fractures, back bone pain, workers.
joints dislocation,
tendonitis, and
psychological strain.
2. Noise: The loudest noise was felt An out-of-date but 1. Construct soundproof enclosure 1. 01 Month Plant
by field workers, working silencing covering noisy machinery to absorb Manager (1)
Heavy machines and equipment operators, system is installed. noise and install vibration isolators 2. 01 Week
motors with 1000 KW tourists, and contractors. to decrease noise transmission. Manager
rating were used in MLCF offers personal 2. Change the noisy cooling fan with 3. 01 Month Mechanical
cement plants for grinding Workers, operators, protective equipment a new one. (2)
and crushing purposes, visitors, and contractors. (PPE) like ear plugs to 3. Noise-producing machinery must
8. Fire: Employees, contractors, Only "class A fire" 1. Provide the factory with a fire 1. 01 Month Executive
interns, tourists, firemen, extinguishers are given. engine (fire lorry/vehicle). Director (1)
The cement and severe damage to 2. Install a smoke and fire detection 2. 01 Month
manufacturing process at machinery and structures Flammable objects are system. Manager I&C
MLCF includes high are all at risk. kept in secure areas. 3. Every year, quarterly fire drills 3. 01 Month (2)
temperatures maintained Fire drills are held once must be organized to put the system
by regulated coal burning, In the event of a fire, the a year. and workers' responses to the test. 4. 01 Month Manager HSE
but there is no fire lack of extinguishers, the 4. Installation of fire hydrant system. (3,7)
protection equipment in incorrect type of 5. A chart of evacuation and an 5. 03 Weeks
place in the case of a extinguishers, or the emergency exit must be installed. Manager
disaster. improper amount of 6. Post "No Smoking" signs 6. 02 Weeks Plant (4)
extinguishers can be throughout the facility.
extremely dangerous 7. Provide firefighting training to all 7. 03 Weeks Manager
because fire cannot be employees and repeat the training Admin (6)
quelled in its early stages, procedure every year. 8. 05 Days
resulting in significant 8. Provide proper personal Manager
damage to the health and protective equipment (PPE) to all Stores (8)
lives of workers, as well as workers, including gloves, fire-
damage to machinery and resistant clothing, helmets, and
Specific legal arguments As per the ILO convention of 1977 (C148, Article 9) which states that:
“As far as possible, the working environment shall be kept free from any hazard due to air pollution,
noise, or vibration-
By technical measures applied to new plant or processes in design or installation, or added to
existing plant or processes, or, where this is not possible.
By supplementary organisational measures.”
Whereas according to the R156 working environment (Air pollution, Noise and vibration
recommendation1977 (No. 156) says that: “Competent must be hired to ensure safe working
environment taking protection of health and equipment efficiency.”
As the suggested action was not being done which is the violation of laws and hence can be
resulted in the heavy penalty on the Maple Leaf Cement Factory.
Specific legal arguments To have firefighting systems measures, ILO Convention of C174 Prevention of major industrial
accidents convention 1993 article 9 (e) states that, “In order to any major industrial accident,
measure should be adopted to limit the consequences of major accidents”.
And as per ILO C155 Occupational safety and health Convention 1981 article 18 states
“Employer shall be required to provide, where necessary, for measure to deal with the emergencies
and accidents including first aid arrangements.”
As the suggested action was ignored and is the violation of laws and consequently can result in the
heavy penalty on the Maple Leaf Cement Factory.
Consideration of likelihood AND severity The likelihood of getting harmed from the hazard category “fire” was high. As the possibility of
arising of fire event is high.
types of injury or ill health
number of workers at risk Just in case of any fire event, it can cause the great loss to the cement plant and severe risk injury
is there, burn or can cause death also, therefore the severity is Catastrophic as per severity
how often the activity is carried
categorization given in “Justification for Action-1”
out
how widespread the risk is Burns, smoke inhalation, CO poisoning, skin damage and PTSD, potentially fatal
depending on fire intensity,
As burning at preheater and kiln is most crucial part of cement manufacturing,
number of workers at these areas is 30 at each shift.
This activity is carried out for complete shift of 8-hour.
The widespread the risk is present with the workers working in Preheater and Kiln
area are exposed to the risks of Fire.
Specific legal arguments The legal arguments that MLCF needs to implement should be, Article 13 (Operational Control) -
“ILO convention C170 Chemical Convention which states that “Employer shall make an
assessment of the risks arising from the use of chemicals at work, and shall protect workers against
such risks by appropriate means, such as: The choice of chemicals that eliminate or minimise the
risk The choice of technology that eliminate or minimise the risk The use of adequate engineering
control measures The adoption of working systems and practices that eliminate or minimise the
risk.”
While R177 – Chemicals Recommendation, 1990 (No. 177) article 11 (1)(a) states that “Where
workers are exposed to hazardous chemicals, the employer should be required to: (a) limit
exposure to such chemicals so as to protect the health of workers.”
The above suggested actions is not there at MLCF, workers are exposed to dust of cement that is
violation of laws that can result in penalties, and fines.
Consideration of likelihood AND severity The likelihood of health issues due to exposure to hazardous substances is very high as workers
at packing plants inhale hazardous cement dust comprising silicon dioxide in the absence of a
ventilation system
How the risk assessment findings will be Before concluding the draft of my risk assessment, a formal meeting will be arranged with Plant
communicated AND who you need to tell Manager and HSE personnel to communicate all the findings of my risk assessment in an
understandable way whilst meeting of minutes will be recorded accordingly. After that the finalized
draft will be shared with the Managing Director (MD) for final approval. after receiving approval from
MD, the risk assessment will be communicated to the HSE Manager and HSE supervisors. And an
overview of the risk assessment will be announced on notice boards to share with all workers and
also toolbox talk will be arranged with all workers of plants at their respective departments.
How you will follow up on the risk To follow up my risk assessment, I have saved the contacts of all responsible persons in my phone
assessment to check that the actions and also in my diary. I have also shared my contact details with these personnel along with the risk
have been carried out assessment findings. Furthermore, I will communicate each responsible person within the given
time frame to take report on suggested control measure. If the performance would not satisfy me,
then I will search out the reason behind delay. I will speak to Executive Director and then Managing
Director and request them to resolve the issues causing delay. Such follow up will safeguard the
MLCF from moral, legal and financial consequences and will raise the organisation repute that will
subsequently benefits the organisation with all aspects.