Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Declaration: By submitting this assessment (Parts 1 – 4) for marking I declare that it is entirely my own work. I understand that falsely claiming that
the work is my own is malpractice and can lead to NEBOSH imposing severe penalties (see the NEBOSH Malpractice Policy for further information).
Important note: You must refer to the document ‘Unit IG2: risk assessment – Guidance and information for learners and Learning Partners’ while
completing all parts of this assessment. Your Learning Partner should provide you with a copy, but it can also be downloaded from the relevant
resources section for this qualification on the NEBOSH website.
Part 1: Background
• In the beginning, a closed meeting was held between the members of the safety
• who you spoke to; and team present at the site to develop an integrated plan and identify the groups that
will be spoken with and benefit from them in determining the risks and then go to the
site and hold mini-meetings with experienced workers, site engineers and
maintenance workers And supervisors to know the work mechanism and what are
the potential risks that may occur or that have occurred previously .
• how you identified:
- the hazards; - The hazard were identified by conducting field tours at the work site, talking with
experienced workers, and using risk assessment reports similar to the work whose
risks are to be determined, as well as making use of the site’s operating engineers
- what is already being done; and By going to the site and watching the applied procedure myself, using work permits to
confirm the action taken, as well as reviewing the previous risk assessment .
- any additional controls/actions By holding a meeting with the operational engineers and the safety team at the site to
that may be required. develop additional procedures based on ILO and refer to ISO 45001, NEBOSH, OSHA
and the Iraqi labor law to choose the most effective and appropriate measure to control
the risk
Hazard category Who might be What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for Responsible
and hazard harmed and how? required? further actions person’s job
to be completed title
(within …)
1- Working at -All workers who work 1- Do not place heavy 1- Provide safety nets around 1- Within 2 HSE manager
Hight / on scaffolds, whose loads on the scaffold the scaffold week and financial
Working on number is (30 worker), platform. manager
scaffold and -by climbing on the 2- Putting a handrail that
falling off it scaffold to disassemble bears the numbers of
and material or install parts of the workers and suits their
fall used machines, and movements.
because of the heavy 3- Physical protections, 2- Provide an appropriate 2- Within 2 day HSE
and large size of these such as toe boards and connection of the scaffold supervisor
iron parts, and because brick guards, should with the building near the
of the unsafe practices be used to prevent scaffold or with the tower
of workers on the objects from falling..
scaffold, it may lead to 4- Inspect the scaffold
the scaffold falling or before using it
collapsing or Not tying 5- Training workers on 3- Contracting with a company 3- Within 3 HSE manager
the scaffold near the how to use scaffolding specialized in erecting week and
building or next to the correctly, knowing scaffolding contracting
machine (tower) , what are safe manager
Hence the fall of the scaffolding practices,
workers, and identifying unsafe
- Which may lead to practices 4- provide body harness every 4- Within 1 HSE manager
serious injuries to worker week and financial
workers such as . manager
2- Confined -All maintenance 1- Complete isolation of 1- Install hoods or fans for Within 3 week HSE
space / workers and welders the area to work in disposal from fumes and Supervisor
Exposure to and supervisors, gasses and Operation
hazard fumes whose number is (15) - 2- Conduct a gas engineer and
or gasses by entering those tanks inspection to ensure financial
to perform welding that the area is free of manager
work, which will be flammable gases 2- The use of EX-type tools
exposed to many of and equipment that are used Within 1 week HSE manager
risk such as fire and 3- Provide AGT in an explosive atmosphere and financial
explosion or manager
asphyxiation from gas 4- Hot work permit work
, fumes vapor
-which will lead to 5- Wear all personal 3- Training workers before HSE
serious injuries such as protective equipment they enter confined spaces Within 1 week Supervisor
loss consciousness, and HR
burns , choking and
consequently to Death
3- Slips and -All the workers on the 1- Reasonable disposal of 1- Spill control and good Within 10 day HSE Manager
Trips / site, supervisors, those spills drainage and site
Oil spills on engineers, 2- Cleaning the floor on a engineer
the ground maintenance workers regular basis is
and people passing by, necessary to maintain a
whose number is safe walking space. 2- Providing information, Within 1 week HSE
approximately (200). 3- Proper housekeeping training and effective Supervisor
procedure shall be supervision and HR
9-Work Workers who enter the 1- Turning off equipment 1- Providing covers for all Within 1 week HSE manager
equipment and towers for periodic during maintenance equipment that contains and financial
machinery / maintenance or while operations rotating parts manager
Trap and working near cooling 2- Using only guards that
entanglement fans or rotating parts, require a special tool to
whose number is remove or modify them
approximately (20), if it isn't possible to 2- Provide sufficient distances HSE
when they enter, parts permanently secure the between these rotating parts Within 4 day supervisor
of their bodies will get guard or interlock the and workers and site
stuck between those guard. This is a type of engineer
parts, leading to severe administrative control.
injuries such as 3- Provide lock-out tag-
cutting, amputation out
and crushing, and may 3- Put warning signs around Within 4 day HSE
reach to death 4- Safe work system these places supervisor
implementation
5- Create a emergency
plan
10-Hazardous All workers present at 1- Placement of hydrogen 1- Source control through Within 1 day HSE Manager
substances / the work site, sulfide gas sensors on continuous maintenance of and operation
Exposure to H2S including supervisors, site pipes and machines to engineer
gas operators, engineers, ensure that they are free of
and even people leaks
passing by, and even
Moral, general legal and financial There are many reasons that made the South Refineries Company to implement the
arguments occupational safety and health system and to preserve the lives and safety of workers, and
among these arguments are:
• Moral arguments / The South Refineries Company is morally committed to
protecting all employees of the company from risks, injuries and accidents that arise
from the danger of work, and it is working hard to provide an appropriate and safe
work environment for workers because it is not moral that the worker leaves his home
safe Saying goodbye to his family in order to go to his place of work and source of
livelihood and not to find safety, the company is committed to physical and moral
support for all workers in order to raise the morale of workers.
• Legal arguments / The South Refineries Company considers the legal aspect to be
the most important issue in achieving occupational safety and health and has made it
at the forefront of work procedures because of its significant consequences in the
future, and among these consequences are fines, imprisonment and closing the
workplace and because of its bad reputation for the company, which It will lose all its
customers in the event of many lawsuits against the company. And here the company
must abide by the local laws set by the government, which clarified all the instructions
that must be submitted by the company or even the workers according to the Iraqi
Labor Law No. (37) for the year 2015 and the international laws ILO and OSHA .
Specific legal arguments - ILO R175 – Safety and Health in Construction Recommendation, 1988 (No. 175).
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1926.105(a) )
- International Labor Organization c120 Health Convention No. 120 of 1964
- International Labor Organization R120 - Health Recommendations No. 120 of 1964
- The International Labor Organization states c167 - Health and Safety Agreement for
Construction No. 167 of 1998,
- International Labor Organization R167 - Health and Safety Recommendations for
Construction No. 167 of 1988
- International General Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety ( RRC Study
Text ) Unit IG2 : Risk Assessment / NEBOSH .
- The German Occupational Safety and Healthy Act (ArbSchG) constitutes the legal
framework for health and safety at work. This act is, in turn, shaped by accident
prevention regulations. The use of safety nets is specified DGUV safety net
information sheet no. 101-011. The product standard for safety nets is the European
Standard EN 1263-1.
- Iraqi Labor Law No. 37 of 2015
Consideration of likelihood AND severity The danger of workers falling from the scaffold and at a high height
Action 2.1 - Install hoods or fans for disposal from fumes and gasses
Specific legal arguments - ILO C155 – Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155).
- ILO R164 – Occupational Safety and Health Recommendation, 1981 (No. 164).
- For construction sites:
- ILO C167 – Safety and Health in Construction Convention, 1988 (No. 167).
- ILO R175 – Safety and Health in Construction Recommendation, 1988 (No. 175).
- The Confined Spaces Regulations 1997 – ILO
- C152 - Occupational Safety and Health (Dock Work) Convention, 1979 (No. 152)
Consideration of likelihood AND severity likelihood / The likelihood of workers being exposed to the risk of burns and asphyxiation
is certain due to the presence of flammable liquids such as oil and other chemicals, or
gasses and fumes that lead to lack oxygen causes asphyxiation or when presence of sparks
resulting from the welding process, which increases the risk of ignition .
Severity / The severity of the injury is catastrophic due to the presence of liquid fumes and
sparks flying from the welding process and because the place is closed and it is not possible
to escape quickly in the event of any emergency, which leads to ignition or explosion of the
place leading to fatal burns or loss consciousness due asphyxiation
How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
• the intended impact of the action;
• The desired effect of a complete emptying of flammable liquids and conducting
ventilation to get rid of the vapors of these liquids is to break the fuel rib of the ignition
pyramid, and therefore the conditions that help in the occurrence of a fire are not
• justification for the timescale that you available also provide pure oxygen to help workers on respirate to prevent their loss
indicated in your risk assessment; consciousness
and • Three weeks have been set for coordination between the safety manager and the
financial manager for the purchase of suction hoods or fans , and limited the number
• whether you think the action will fully required to be equipped from outside the company.
control the risk. • The additional measures that have been taken do not completely eliminate the
danger, but rather will reduce the likelihood of asphyxiation , a fire or explosive
occurring from a certain to a possible.
Specific legal arguments - ILO C155 – Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155).
- ILO R164 – Occupational Safety and Health Recommendation, 1981 (No. 164).
- ILO Toolkit Control Sheet 300 Control approach 3 - https://www.ilo.org › documents ›
wcms_101011
- Slips and trips (Labour administration and inspection) – ILO
- C062 - Safety Provisions (Building) Convention, 1937 (No. 62)
- 29 CFR 1910.22-.30 Walking/working surfaces / OSHA
- International General Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety ( RRC Study Text
) Unit IG2 : Risk Assessment / NEBOSH .
- Iraqi Labor Law No. 37 of 2015 - Which provides for the provision of an appropriate
working environment and the control of surfaces that cause tripping and slipping
through source control
Consideration of likelihood AND severity Likelihood / The Likelihood is certain because of the large amount of liquid spilled on the
ground, either because there are large numbers of leaks, whether from pipes, flanges, or
equipment, and because of the large numbers of workers working near those spills,
especially in maintenance work, and as a result of the many movements, it will be a likelihood
slipping and tripping are too great .
Severity / The severity of the injury is major because the floor is of a very hard type
(concrete) and the presence of oil spills in large quantities and as a result of the many
movement will make the severity of the injury great, which requires medical intervention such
as fractures and others
How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
• the intended impact of the action; • The desired effect of the spill control is to prevent the leakage of liquids from the
source through frequent maintenance and effective supervision to identify all sources
of such spills and prevent their spillage on the floors on which workers work, or by
providing controlled good drainage away from the floors and workplaces of worker .
Learner number:00651550 Learner name: Hayder Kamel zayer Page 19
of 21
• justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
• whether you think the action will fully • The time scale that has been determined is ten days, during which all sources of those
control the risk. spills will be searched to be treated or rerouted away from the movement of workers.
• The measure taken will not eliminate the risk completely, but will significantly reduce
the likelihood of danger, that is, by reducing the amount of ground spills, it will turn the
probability from the sure to unlikely, and therefore the severity of the injury will also
be minor .
Planned review date/period with The risk assessment will be reviewed according to the company’s system and procedures.
reasoning As for the South Refineries Company, a risk assessment review is conducted every 6 months
from 1/1/2022 to 1/7/2022 , but this procedure is not a fixed matter because some risk
assessment is reviewed when changing work, introducing a new activity, changing the work
team, or when something happens An emergency such as an injury, accident or specific
defect.
How the risk assessment findings will be After completing the risk assessment, this assessment will then be communicated to all
communicated AND who you need to tell workers (engineers, supervisors, managers, maintenance workers, operators, all people
around those risks). Which may be either by making a clear summary and in the simplest
terms so that it is understood by the simplest workers and clarifying all the risks and the time
period that must be adhered to implement the procedure and who are responsible for
implementing those procedures. Or by conducting educational seminars to raise the
awareness of workers and raise their morale, or by including them in a training program for
workers to train them on how to find and control risks.