Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Choose a Topic - Select a topic related to the A. Position argument - This type of argument
field of technical writing that is debatable and makes you present an assertion or a claim about
has sufficient evidence available to support an issue, a point, or a question, which will lead
different viewpoints. you to a discussion or dispute that will elicit
• Conduct Research - Conduct thorough research conflicting views. Here, you have to define or
on the chosen topic to gather relevant explain exactly the nature of the issue, adopt a
information and evidence. Consider various solid stand, and argue convincingly for your
perspectives to develop a comprehensive views and against your opponent's opinions.
understanding of the subject matter.
• Develop a Claim - Craft a clear and concise BASIC POINTS IN WRITIING ARGUMENTATION:
claim that presents your argument. The claim
should be specific, debatable, and manageable 1. Choose a debatable issue - a position
within the scope of your composition. argument that states. Without a debate, there is
• Organize Your Composition - Structure your no argument.
argumentative composition with an 2. Present a clear, definite viewpoint. Readers
introduction, body paragraphs, and a do not want to guess your position. Although
conclusion. Each paragraph should focus on you present both sides of a position, readers
presenting evidence, addressing must be clear about which side your support.
counterarguments, or reinforcing the main 3.Support your viewpoint with reasoning and
claim. Use transitional phrases to ensure a evidence.
smooth flow between paragraphs. 4. Identify counterclaims (dissenting opinions).
• Support with Evidence - Utilize credible sources When you address differing or contradictory
and evidence to support your argument. opinions, show empathy, the ability to
Include examples, statistics, research findings, understand and share the feelings of others, for
or expert opinions to enhance the those with dissenting views.
persuasiveness and credibility of your
composition. B. Proposal argument - you give your opponent
• Address Counterarguments - Anticipate remedies to solve his problem. Presenting a
potential counterarguments and address them course of action for a problematic situation, this
using logical reasoning and evidence. By doing type of argument tells you how to change things
so, you strengthen your own argument and for improvement purposes.
demonstrate your ability to consider opposing To achieve the objective of proposal argument,
viewpoints. you have to give an accurate explanation of the
• Conclude Effectively - Summarize the main problem, convince the other party to consider
points of your argument and restate your claim the proposed solution, and make sure that your
in the conclusion. Leave a lasting impression proposal is practicable, achievable, or workable.
on the reader by emphasizing the significance
of your argument and its implications C. Causal Argument - a causal argument is one
• Conclusion - argumentation plays a vital role in that focuses specifically on how something has
technical writing by effectively conveying caused, or has led to, some particular problem.
information, persuading readers, and justifying A causal argument answers a how or why
conclusions. question: How did things get to be the way they
are? Why did something happen?
A causal argument is an important argument
type, as people are often looking for reasons as
to why things have happened but may not be Example: The children's several-hour
sure or have all the I necessary information. In TV viewing is detrimental to their health for
your causal argument, you get the chance to they become glued to the device in a long
make these things clear. period of time. ( long period of time is the
repetition of several hours.)
D. Evaluation Argument - an evaluation
argument is an argument that is used to c. Either...or - if you use this type of wrongful
evaluate whether a particular element is "good" reasoning, you must disregard other
or "bad." For this argument to work, those alternatives or options, because this statement
participating in the argument must first come to gives you only two options to choose from.
an agreement as to the criteria of "good" and Example: Either you pay your five-
"bad". Evaluation arguments make a claim month arrears today or you subject your
about the quality of something. account to 25% monthly interest charges.
E. Narrative Argument – a narrative argument is d. False analogies - this happens when you
an argument in which an individual states their stress the similarities of two cases.
case by telling a story that illustrates a point Example: Chemotherapy treatment
directly related to the argument. Unlike other worked successfully on the German-cancer
arguments which rely solely on figures and patient; hence, Mr. Hurtz, a German athlete, has
facts, narrative arguments allow individuals to to go through the chemotherapy cure, too.
use a narrative to express their stance on a e. Hasty generalization - in this case, you apply
particular issue. your assertion or claim to a wider scale, despite
A narrative essay is one that uses a story, usually insufficiency of your evidence.
presented in chronological order, to make some Example: An academic supervisor
kind of point. When you are writing a narrative discovered grammar errors in five English
argument, that point is persuasive or textbooks being used by students in one private
argumentative school in Manila. He then goes to the
Department of Education Chairman to request
F. Rogerian Argument - is an argument used to him to subject into internal evaluation all
determine the best possible solution to a English textbooks being.
particular issue based on the interests and
needs of all parties involved. This type of f. Name calling - to prove your point, you resort
argument is used to help those with opposing to using names casting negative idea or
viewpoints reach a common ground by allowing meaning to your opponent's identity.
them to look at a situation from a different Example: You are not only a tax evader,
perspective. In a Rogerian argument, both but also asocial climber. With your reasoning,
parties acknowledge the opposition and build you are Dennis the Menace in our society.
trust by identifying each others' merit.