You are on page 1of 16

Test Bank for American Government Stories of a Nation

Essentials Edition 1st Edition Abernathy 1452287309


9781452287300
Fulllink download:
Test Bank:
https://testbankpack.com/p/test-bank-for-american-government-stories-of-a-
nation-essentials-edition-1st-edition-abernathy-1452287309-9781452287300/

CHAPTER 2
The Early History of Correctional Thought and Practice

MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. The purpose of punishment as a public spectacle was:
a. immediate deterrence
b. specific deterrence.
c. exhibition of the sovereign’s power.
d. both crime control and exhibition of the sovereign’s power.

ANS: D REF: 27 OBJ: 1

2. The following is an example of corporal punishment:


a. forgiveness.
b. whipping.
c. imprisonment.
d. religious education.

ANS: B REF: 27 OBJ: 1

3. Jeremy Benthem argued that effective punishments prevent in the future.


a. negative behavior
b. positive behavior
c. similar behavior
d. coerced behavior

ANS: C REF: 37 OBJ: 4

4. Political liberals and encouraged reform of the prison system during the
Enlightenment Period.
a. Political conservatives
b. independents
c. religious groups

22
d. political liberals

ANS: C REF: 36 OBJ: 2

5. The penitentiary was developed during the:


a. 1740s.
b. 1790s.
c. 1830s.
d. 1900s.

ANS: C REF: 28 OBJ: 1, 2

23
Chapter 2: The Early History of Correctional Thought and Practice

6. The invention of the penitentiary occurred because of:


a. the influence of the Age of Reason.
b. a response to negative social conditions and their influence on the rise of crime.
c. the growth of the surplus labor due to the Industrial Revolution.
d. all of these

ANS: D REF: 38-39 OBJ: 1, 2, 3

7. By the 1900s, punishments were carried out under the supervision of:
a. the governor.
b. the king.
c. correctional staff.
d. the victim.

ANS: C REF: 27 OBJ: 2, 3

8. Lex talionis embodies which of the following principles?


a. Punishment should correspond in degree and kind to the offense.
b. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth is legal punishment.
c. Punishment needs to be proportionate.
d. All of these

ANS: D REF: 28 OBJ: 1, 2, 3

9. The belief that a punishment inflicted on an offender must achieve enough good to outweigh the
pain inflicted is called:
a. utilitarianism.
b. classical criminology.
c. the Enlightenment.
d. wergild.

ANS: A REF: 37 OBJ: 2, 3

10. The practice of removing offenders from the community to another land was known as:
a. benefit of clergy.
b. galley slavery.
c. wergild.
d. transportation.

ANS: D REF: 32 OBJ: 1

11. The Penitentiary Act was based upon four core principles where prisoners were confined in
solitary cells and labored silently in common rooms. They include
a. secure and sanitary conditions.
b. nonsystematic inspections.
c. fees for inmates.
d. a continued regimen.

ANS: A REF: 38 OBJ: 1, 2

24
Test Bank

12. The founder of the Classical School of Thought is .


a. Cesare Beccaria
b. John Howard
c. Cesare Lombroso
d. Jeremy Benthem

ANS: A REF: 36 OBJ: 3

13. The period known as the Enlightenment had what effect(s) on society?
a. It brought a reaction against feudal society and the monopoly of religion.
b. It stressed the notion of equality for all citizens.
c. It was largely influenced by the growth of scientific thinking.
d. All of these

ANS: D REF: 36 OBJ: 2, 3, 4

14. The Enlightenment proposed which of the following ideas for correctional reform?
a. A rewriting of penal codes to increase the severity of criminal sanctions.
b. A greater belief in the application of pain as a specific and general deterrent.
c. The invention of the penitentiary, where prisoners could be isolated from the temptations
of the outside world.
d. An increase in the number of criminal laws and, as a result, a growth in the numbers and
types of prisoners.

ANS: C REF: 36 OBJ: 2, 3, 4

15. For the purpose of deterrence, which principle(s) did Beccaria believe were most important?
a. Severity
b. Swiftness
c. Certainty
d. Both swiftness and certainty

ANS: D REF: 37 OBJ: 2, 3

16. The term wergild focuses on which of the following:


a. rehabilitation for offenders
b. money paid to relatives or victims of a crime
c. educational programs
d. vocational programs

ANS: C REF: 28 OBJ: 1

17. How was the existing system of justice altered during the Enlightenment?
a. People reconsidered the administration of law and redefined corrections.
b. During this period the classical school of criminology emerged, with its insistence on a
rational link between the gravity of the crime and the severity of the punishment.
c. The social contract and utilitarianism emphasized limitations on the government and the
need to erect a system of punishments so that people would be deterred from crime.
d. All of these

ANS: D REF: 36 OBJ: 1, 2, 3

25
Chapter 2: The Early History of Correctional Thought and Practice

18. During the Age of Reason, advances in scientific thinking led to a questioning attitude that
emphasized which of the following?
a. Observation
b. Experimentation
c. Technological development
d. All of these

ANS: D REF:35 OBJ: 2, 3, 4

19. As a social institution, corrections reflects the vision and concerns of the:
a. government.
b. larger community.
c. warden and administrators.
d. sentencing judges.

ANS: B REF: 28 OBJ: 1

20. According to the text, Legal sanctions, in the form we are familiar with today, emerged in the:
a. 1700s.
b. 1200s.
c. 1500s.
d. 1800s.

ANS: B REF: 28 OBJ: 1

21. The response to crime was viewed as essentially a private affair prior to the century?
a. 17th
b. 15th
c. 13th
d. 18th

ANS: C REF: 28 OBJ: 1

22. was a leader of reform in England and the developer of a utilitarian approach to crime
and punishment
a. Jeremy Bentham
b. John Howard
c. Cesare Beccaria
d. Bishop Nicholas Ridley

ANS: A REF: 36 OBJ: 3, 4, 5

23. Wergild developed as:


a. a barter system.
b. a method for the king to bring his subjects directly under his rule.
c. a method of treating private wrongs as public crimes.
d. a system of compensation.

ANS: D REF: 28 OBJ: 1

26
Test Bank

24. The dominant social institution during the Middle Ages in England and Europe was:
a. the king.
b. the sheriff.
c. the penitentiary.
d. the church.

ANS: D REF: 29 OBJ: 1, 2, 3

25. The law of the civil society as distinguished from church law is known as:
a. natural law.
b. lex talionis.
c. secular law.
d. benefit of clergy.

ANS: C REF: 28 OBJ: 1, 2, 3

26. Benefit of clergy was extended to:


a. all worthy men of the realm.
b. only wealthy aristocrats of the realm.
c. monks and nuns only.
d. all literate persons.

ANS: D REF: 29 OBJ: 1

27. The was born out of concern for the sinfulness of sloth.
a. wergild
b. workhouse
c. penitentiary
d. bridewell

ANS: B REF: 31 OBJ: 1

TRUE/FALSE
1. Attempts to reform prisons began in the 1500s with the disintegration of feudalism.

ANS: T REF: 32 OBJ: 1

2. The new industrialism brought about a shift from penal to economic considerations as the basis for
punishment.

ANS: T REF: 35 OBJ: 2

3. Major efforts began by the start of the 19th century in both Europe and the United States to devise
a more severe penal sanction that focused completely on the body.

ANS: F REF: 27 OBJ: 2, 3, 4

27
Chapter 2: The Early History of Correctional Thought and Practice

4. Under the law of retaliation, lex talionis, vengeance was a duty to be carried out by the person
wronged or by a family member.

ANS: T REF: 28 OBJ: 1

5. In England by the year 1200, a system of wergild, or payment of money as compensation, had
developed as a way for the king to collect additional resources from the citizens.

ANS: F REF: 28 OBJ: 1

6. Best known for his utilitarian theories and often referred to as his “hedonic calculus,” Jeremy
Bentham was a leading scholar of his time.

ANS: T REF: 37 OBJ: 2, 4

7. The Age of Reason brought about new ideas based on rationalization, the importance of
individuals and the limitations of government.

ANS: T REF: 35 OBJ: 2

8. One of the major reasons England and Europe resorted to sending offenders to the New World was
that their prisons and houses of corrections were filled to overflowing.

ANS: T REF: 32 OBJ: 1

9. The Enlightenment period recognized that people in America and Europe began to rethink
procedural matters toward offenders.

ANS: T REF: 35 OBJ: 2

10. Public opinion about punishment has remained static over the last 200 years.

ANS: F REF: 28 OBJ: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

11. Shaming is a new punishment idea.

ANS: F REF: 35 OBJ: 1

COMPLETION
1. Scholars point to the as the first comprehensive statement of prohibited
behavior.

ANS: Hammurabic Code


REF: 29 OBJ: 1

28
Test Bank

2. Because punishment was considered a powerful general , authorities in from the


sixteenth to eighteen century in Europe carried sanctions out in the market square for all to see.

ANS: deterrent
REF: 33 OBJ: 1

3. The leading reformer in England and the developer of the utilitarian approach to crime and
punishment was .

ANS: John Howard


REF: 38 OBJ: 5

4. Secular law is the law of society

ANS: civil
REF: 28 OBJ: 2

5. According to the authors The Enlightenment was a reaction against feudal and
traditions.

ANS: monarchical
REF: 36 OBJ: 1, 2

6. A school of criminology that views behavior as stemming from free will is known as the
school.

ANS: classical
REF: 36 OBJ: 2, 3

7. Until the 1800s, was authorized to house pretrial detainees, debtors, and vagrants.

ANS: jail
REF: 31 OBJ: 1

8. The doctrine that the aim of all action should be the greatest balance of pleasure over pain and that
a punishment inflicted on an offender must achieve enough good to outweigh the pain is called
.

ANS: utilitarianism
REF: 37 OBJ: 2, 3, 4

9. The rationalist philosophy of the emphasizes individual rights.

ANS: Enlightenment
REF: 35 OBJ: 2, 3

10. The humanistic concerns of the helped launch penal reforms.

ANS: Quakers
REF: 39 OBJ: 2

29
Chapter 2: The Early History of Correctional Thought and Practice

MATCHING
Match each item to the phrase or sentence listed below.
a. punishment to a body inflicting pain f. the right to be tried in ecclesiastical court
b. law of civil society g. Retaliation
c. forced rowing h. Age of Reason
d. detention facility i. A form of banishment
e. pleasure over pain j. free will and severe punishment

1. Benefit of Clergy
2. classical criminology
3. corporal punishment
4. Enlightenment
5. galley slavery
6. House of corrections
7. Hulk
8. Lex talionis
9. Secular Law
10. Utilitarianism

1. ANS: F REF: 29
2. ANS: J REF: 36
3. ANS: A REF: 33
4. ANS: H REF: 35
5. ANS: C REF: 29
6. ANS: D REF: 31
7. ANS: I REF: 33
8. ANS: G REF: 28
9. ANS: B REF: 28
10. ANS: E REF: 37

ESSAY
1. Briefly summarize the social, political, and scientific ideas advocated during the Age of Reason
and the effect they had on correctional thinking. Discuss whether you recognize any of these ideas
in today’s society.

ANS: Answers will vary OBJ: 2

2. Shaming is not a new idea but it is making a comeback. Give historically early examples of
shaming and discuss whether you think it is a useful tool of social control. Why or why not? Are
there any negative associations with shaming?

ANS: Answers will vary OBJ: 1

30
Test Bank

3. Define the various periods discussed in chapter 2. Name each and what they stand for during their
time. Then discuss in which era would you prefer to be punished? Discuss why you chose the
time period and punishments that you did.

ANS: Answers will vary OBJ: 1, 2

4. Discuss the contributions of Cesare Beccaria and the classical school of thought. Are the concepts
still in use today? If so, how? If not, why not?

ANS: Answers will vary OBJ: 3

5. Discuss the many forms of punishment to criminals in the early years of corrections. How do they
compare to today? Should they or should they not still be in place? If so, why and if not, why not?

ANS: Answers will vary OBJ: 1

31
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -


Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If


you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set
forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied


warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the


Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of


Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the


assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project


Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500


West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to


the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws


regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states


where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot


make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current


donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project


Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several


printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,


including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.

You might also like