Petidentityapp: A Mobile Application With Emergency Rescue
And Domestic Pet Adoption For Pet Paradise Ph
Jefferson A. Costales
Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science and
Technology, Manila, Philippines
jacostales@earist.ph.education
Allen Paul G. Olguera
Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science and
Technology, Manila, Philippines
Olguera.a.bsinfotech@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
The study’s goal is to develop a system that anyone may use to
rescue and adopt pets. The application displays and spotlights pets
for attention using the power of social media. The program includes
numerous animal-centric components but also contains a section
where you may interact with others. The survey form was used
to collect the data of the respondents, and based on the findings
of the analysis, the study’s respondents obtained high percentage
results on the questionnaire given by the researcher, and it was eval-
uated using International Standardization Organization (ISO/IEC)
25010:2011 system and software quality requirements. Additionally,
there is no significance in the perception of respondents to the app.
The primary task of this application is to accomplished process
satisfaction with regards to its goal to also life the organizational
image. Most organization both nonprofit and profit generating,
adapt and transition from the traditional or manual web-based
these days. It is to take advantage of the resources and emerging
technologies of today’s context, as it is main solution for faster
and smooth communication, transaction and data collection. The
mean of communication for the animal shelter is the interface itself
replacing physical transactions or phone calls to mobile application
for its convenience and availability, a mobile application transaction
of an animal shelter is a great advantage for its always available.
CCS CONCEPTS
• Information systems → Information systems applications; Mo-
bile information processing systems.
KEYWORDS
mobile application, domestic pet, adopt pets, social media
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or
classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed
for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation
on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the
author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or
republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission
and/or a fee. Request permissions from permissions@acm.org.
NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea
© 2023 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
ACM ISBN 979-8-4007-0922-7/23/12
https://doi.org/10.1145/3639233.3639325
252
Melody L. Gabas
Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science and
Technology, Manila, Philippines
mlgabas@earist.ph.education
Bernadette C. Macabebe
Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science and
Technology, Manila, Philippines
macabebe.b.bsinfotech@gmail.com
ACM Reference Format:
Jefferson A. Costales, Melody L. Gabas, Allen Paul G. Olguera,
and Bernadette C. Macabebe. 2023. Petidentityapp: A Mobile Application
With Emergency Rescue And Domestic Pet Adoption For Pet Paradise Ph. In
2023 7th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Infor-
mation Retrieval (NLPIR 2023), December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3639233.3639325
1 INTRODUCTION
Domestic pets such as cats and dogs have been human companions
for thousands of years, we can’t deny how these beautiful animals
made an impact on every individual and our society. Keeping
animals as pets is ethically permissible since it is the natural method
for many breeds of different animal species, including dogs and cats,
to exist. These animals have a long history of serving as human
companions.
Trigg et al., (2016) stated that the new concept of the pet-
owning self has discussed three self-psychology perspectives: self-
extension, symbolic interactionism, and self-object relations. We
purposefully depart from the realm of attachment theory to ar-
gue that these three epistemological approaches to self-identity,
although related, warrant closer examination.
Domestic pets are more than just friends; thus, we did this study
for them to address the problem of underprivileged domestic an-
imals that need adoption, rescue, or identification. And due to
their priceless loyalty and love for us, domestic pets deserved to be
treated fairly as humans. Unfortunately, uncontrollable bad circum-
stances still happen to them, and some animals still suffer. Those
fortunate enough to have loving owners receive the same treatment
as humans, unlike those unfortunate domestic street animals. Some
animals need help and care that only humans can do so. They need
care and a good environment to live a comfortable life.
Veterinary clinics play a major role in their lives. Although
roaming street animals are inevitable, there are several instances in
which they were injured due to a busy outside environment. Also,
some pet owners are unable to care for their pets’ newborn puppies.
Petnapping is another issue that needs to be addressed.
RI No. 43 Permenkes (2019) confirmed that an animal shelter is
government-operated, government-contracted, and receives sup-
plemental government funding. Most shelters are operated out of
a physical establishment, frequently with some facility space allo-
cated to veterinary. Animal rescues, by contrast, are often smaller
NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework
and independently operated, without governmental support. While
some may maintain official premises, many house user animals
through an extensive volunteer foster-care system.
Animal shelters help animals that need a good home that humans
can’t provide. They are also the go-to places for people who want
to adopt in the right way and provide information in case there are
animals that need help to be rescued.
Pet Paradise Ph is an animal shelter founded by Janice Spiers
located in Diego Silang Street, Quezon City. It is a non-profit orga-
nization and Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) which aims
to save stray, neglected and maltreated animals and provide them
with safe haven where they can improve their lives via protection,
rehabilitation and care.
The vision of the shelter is that no animals should be oppressed
and should have a chance to get rehabilitated in a good way wherein
it can help the animals find comfort and feel that they belong to
society. The researchers objective is to offer them an innovative
app that can be useful to them and to those people that love and
care for animals.
The framework of PetIdentityApp: A Mobile Application with
Emergency Rescue and Domestic Pet Adoption for Pet Paradise PH
is based on how the shelter conducts and conducts their adoption
and rescue and with a little twist to it, we added some changes to
the application to make it more user friendly.
PetIdentityApp is an innovative application that covers not only
the identification of pets but also how to adopt a pet and if our
pets have sudden emergencies. We’re proposing this application
because we know that it is very useful to the client. We create and
design the app according to the preferences of the beneficiary for
them to be familiar with our application after we employ it.
2 METHODOLOGY
The conceptual framework by the researchers serves as a visual
representation of how the suggested system works. The researcher
produced an IPO which means Input, Process, Output to show the
proposed system used in this project. Figure 1 below illustrates how
253
Jefferson Costales et al.
the system works. Input content is the Client Records, Pet Records,
Pet Adoption, and Emergency Response while Process Content
is Design, testing, and Implementation. Finally, the output is the
PetIdentityapp: A Mobile Application with Emergency Rescue and
Domestic Pet Adoption for the Pet Paradise PH.
In figure 2, the researchers explained the System Development
Life Cycle that was used to construct the system. The research
concludes that Agile is the optimal method for developing a system.
The steps guided the development of this study include planning,
requirement analysis, documenting, designing, developing, and
testing.
This study was conducted through one of the social media plat-
forms that is commonly used in the society. The respondents were
not forced and especially not chosen; they voluntarily answered
the survey that was distributed on various social media platforms.
A total of 84 people participated in this study, 73 of them were
non-expert respondents such as employees, parents, teachers and
others who can use the application along with 11 expert respon-
dents such as web developers, network administrators, software
engineers, etc.,who reviewed the application.
The questionnaire is one of the instruments used to process and
gather data that consists of a sequence of questions. The survey is
essential to this research because it will accumulate information
needed in developing this Pet Identity Application. By utilizing
this, the researchers collected data in much lesser time.
Researchers used Google Form to disseminate the survey. The
researchers collected data using Google Forms in a number of dif-
ferent methods. The body of an email contained a form that enabled
recipients to post comments straight from their Inbox.
An interview between two persons to discuss something or an act
of inquiry to acquire a desired response that is necessary for solving
a specific problem. This is when the interviewee is questioned
directly and vocally to gather important data.
In table 1, the data was interpreted by using the Five (5) Likert
Scale Method, as the criterion which serves as the basis for the
interpretation of the data.
Petidentityapp: A Mobile Application With Emergency Rescue And Domestic Pet Adoption For Pet Paradise Ph NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Figure 2: Agile Model

Table 1: The Likert Scale

Point Scale Range Interval Verbal Interpretation Symbol

5 4.20-5 Strongly Agree SA
4 3.40-4.19 Agree A
3 2.60-3.39 Moderately Agree MA
2 1.80-2.59 Disagree D
1 1.00-1.79 Strongly Disagree SD

Table 2: The demographic profile of respondents in terms of Gender

GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE Rank

Male 44 52.38 1
Female 40 47.62 2
TOTAL 84 100.00
GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE Rank

Table 3: The demographic profile of respondents in terms of Age

AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE Rank

51 and above 1 1.19 4
37 – 50 5 5.95 3
25 – 36 8 9.52 2
24 and below 70 83.33 1
TOTAL 84 100.00

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Application
In figure 3, the researchers made use of two survey participants,
namely the study’s user or beneficiary, and industry experts. The
survey’s goal is to evaluate the proposed system entitled “Pet Iden-
tity App – A Mobile Application with Emergency Rescue and Do-
mestic for Pet Paradise PH” in terms of functional suitability, per-
formance efficiency, compatibility, usability, reliability, security,
maintainability, and portability using the International Standard-
ization Organization (ISO/IEC) 25010:2011 systems and software
quality requirements. The data was tallied and verbally interpreted
from 73 non experts and 11 experts.
Table 2 gives the demographic profile of respondents in terms
of age. As shown in the table, 52.38% or 44 respondents are male
while 47.62% or 40 respondents are female. In general, most of the
respondents are males.

254
NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea Jefferson Costales et al.

Figure 3: The Application’s app launcher, login page, user
profile, and newspage
Table 3 displays the total number of responses as well as the age
group with the highest rating. The figure shows that the age group
24 years old and below received the most replies, followed by age
groups 25-36, 37-50, and 51 and above, who obtained the lowest
position, rank 4. Overall, there were 84 responses, including 11
experts and 73 users.
Table 4 depicts the profile of responses based on their category.
There are two categories of respondents: users and experts. Those
in rank 1 had a frequency of 73(86.90%), while those in rank 2
had a frequency of 11 (13.10%). The experts were gathered outside
the institution to offer technical comments on the system. The
institution offers technical comments on the system that we are
constructing.
• 5 4.20-5.00 Strongly Agree (SA)
• 4 3.40-4.19 Agree (A)
• 3 2.60-3.39 Moderately Agree (MA)
• 2 1.80-2.59 Disagree
• 1 1.00-1.79 Strongly Disagree
The table 5 depicts the level of assessment of the response in
terms of Functional Suitability. Functional Suitability has three
indicators: completeness, correctness, and appropriateness. Com-
pleteness indicates that the system is intended to cover all of the
needed tasks and user objectives. In terms of completeness, the
professionals have a value of 4.58 and are understood as ”Strongly
Agree”, on the other hand, the users have a result of 4.27 which
is likewise regarded as ”Strongly Agree”. Overall, the composite
average is 4.33 and translated as ”Strongly Agree”.
The second indicator of functional stability is correctness. Cor-
rectness is the technique that generates accurate outcomes with
the appropriate accuracy. The result of the experts indicates 4.50
and 4.02 in the users which are both regarded as ”Strongly Agree”.
Overall, the composite average is 4.10 and is read as ”Agree”.
The last indicator is the appropriateness, or the system is in-
tended to make doing specific activities easier. The result shows
that the experts evaluated these features as 4.33 and interpreted
them as “Strongly Agree”. Likewise, the users have 3.93 and are
interpreted as “Agree”. Overall, the assessment of respondents in
Functional Suitability is 4.14 and interpreted as “Agree”
Table 6 demonstrates the respondents’ level of assessment of
Performance Efficiency. Time Behavior and Resource Utilization
are some indicators of performance efficiency. Time Behavior in-
dicates that the system is intended to cover all of the necessary
tasks and user objectives. The expert evaluation in terms of Time
Behavior reveals a result of 4.64 with a verbal interpretation of ”
Strongly Agree” on the other hand, the non-expert has a result of
4.26 with a verbal interpretation of ” Strongly Agree”. With a verbal
interpretation of ”Strongly Agree,” the composite average is 4.45.
Resource Utilization is the second indicator in Performance Ef-
ficiency. The technique that generates precise results with the
requisite accuracy is known as resource utilization. The result of
the expert shows 4.18 while the non-expert shows 4.16 with verbal
interpretation of ”Agree”. Overall, the composite average is 4.17
with the linguistic interpretation of ”Agree”.
Table 7 in terms of compatibility, the expert received 4.23 from
12 respondents, while the user received 4.16 from 73 respondents,
for a total of 4.20. In terms of system compatibility, it reveals that
the expert earned rank 1 and the user obtained rank 2.
The table 8 shows each respondent’s total Usability points, be-
ginning with an expert with 4.55 and 4.26 in user, a composite of
4.40 for Usability 1, Usability 2 with 4.55 experts and 4.29 in user
composite of 4.42, Usability 3 with 4.55 by experts and 4.23 by a
user, Usability 4 with a total of 4.27 points by experts and 4.18 by
the user with a composite of 4.23, and finally, Usability 5 with 4.55
in experts and 4.26 in user.

Table 4: The demographic profile of respondents in terms of Category

TYPE OF RESPONDENTS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE Rank

Expert 11 13.10 2
Non Expert 73 86.90 1
TOTAL 84 100.00

255
Petidentityapp: A Mobile Application With Emergency Rescue And Domestic Pet Adoption For Pet Paradise Ph NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Table 5: Level of Assessment in terms of Functional Suitability

Indicator Non – Experts Experts Composite

W.M V.I W.M V.I W.M V.I
The app addresses all the tasks and user 4.23 SA 4.45 SA 4.34 SA
objectives specified.
When it came to requesting information, 4.34 SA 4.55 SA 4.44 SA
the app was responsive.
The app’s interface enabled me to use all of 4.14 A 4.64 SA 4.39 SA
the app’s functions and features.
OVERALL MEAN 4.24 SA 4.55 SA 4.39 SA

Table 6: Level of Assessment in terms of Performance Efficiency

Indicator Non-Experts Experts Composite

W.M. V.I. W.M V.I. W.M. V.I.
1. A request is processed by the 4.26 SA 4.64 SA 4.45 SA
system, and a response is returned.
2. The amounts and types of 4.16 A 4.18 A 4.17 A
resources used by the system when
performing its functions meet
requirements.
OVERALL MEAN 4.21 A 4.41 A 4.31 SA

Table 7: Level of Assessment in terms of Compatibility

Indicator Non- Experts Experts Composite

W.M V.I W.M V.I W.M V.I
1. The system can efficiently perform its required 4.19 A 4.27 SA 4.23 SA
functions while sharing a common environment and
resources with other products, without negatively
affecting any other product.
2. The system is compatible with other running one 4.14 A 4.18 A 4.16 A
application and will not affect the behavior of the other
application

OVER ALL MEAN 4.16 A 4.23 SA 4.20 SA

Table 9 shows that experts respond with 4.41 points, while the
user responds with 4.25 points overall and a composite of 4.33. This
table demonstrates that reliability is useful and widely accepted by
both users and professionals.
Table 10 shows the respondents’ level of security assessment.
Confidentiality, Integrity, Non-repudiation, Authenticity, and Ac-
countability are the five indicators of security. Confidentiality
implies that the system has been developed to cover all of the nec-
essary duties and user objectives. The expert evaluation in terms of
Confidentiality gives a result of 4.64 with a verbal interpretation of
”Strongly Agree”, on the other hand, the non-expert has a result of
4.33 with a verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”. With a verbal
interpretation of ”Strongly Agree,” the composite average is 4.48.
Integrity is the second security indicator. The Integrity technol-
ogy gives precise results with the necessary accuracy. The result
of the expert shows 4.64 whereas the non-expert shows 4.29 with
verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”. Overall, the composite
average is 4.46 with verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”.
Non-repudiation is the third indicator in Security. Non-
repudiation technology generates accurate findings with the requi-
site accuracy. The result of the expert shows 4.45 whereas the non-
expert shows 4.32 with verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”.
Overall, the composite average is 4.38 with verbal interpretation of
”Strongly Agree”.
Authenticity is the fourth security indicator. The technique that
generates precise results with the needed accuracy is known as
Authenticity. The result of the expert shows 4.36 whereas the non-
expert shows 4.36 with a verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”.
Overall, the composite average is 4.36 with verbal interpretation of
”Strongly Agree”.

256
NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea Jefferson Costales et al.

Table 8: Level of Assessment in terms of Usability

Indicator Non -Experts Experts Composite

W.M V.I W.M V.I W.M. V.I
The system allows users to recognize if it 4.26 SA 4.55 SA 4.40 SA
is appropriate for their needs.
System can be used by people with the 4.29 SA 4.55 SA 4.42 SA
widest range of characteristics and
capabilities to achieve a specified goal in a
specified context of use.
System has attributes that make it easy to 4.23 SA 4.55 SA 4.39 SA
operate and control.
System protects users against making 4.18 A 4.27 SA 4.23 SA
errors.
User interface enables pleasing and 4.26 A 4.55 SA 4.40 SA
satisfying interaction for the user

OVERALL MEAN 4.24 SA 4.49 SA 4.37 SA

Table 9: Level of Assessment in terms of Reliability

Indicator Non - Experts Experts Composite

W.M V.I. W.M. V.I W.M. V.I
A system, product or component meets needs for 4.30 SA 4.36 SA 4.33 SA
reliability under normal operation.
A system, product or component is operational 4.29 SA 4.36 SA 4.33 SA
and accessible when required for use.
A system, product or component operates as 4.19 A 4.45 SA 4.32 SA
intended despite the presence of hardware or
software faults.
In the event of an interruption or a failure, a 4.23 SA 4.45 SA 4.34 SA
product or system can recover the data directly
affected and re-establish the desired state of the
system.
OVERALL MEAN 4.25 SA 4.41 SA 4.33 SA

Table 10: Level of Assessment in terms of Security

Indicator Non - Experts Experts Composite

W.M. V.I. W.M. V.I. W.M. V.I
System ensures that data are accessible only 4.33 SA 4.64 SA 4.48 SA
to those authorized to have access.
A system, product or component prevents 4.29 SA 4.64 SA 4.46 SA
unauthorized access to, or modification of,
computer programs or data.
Actions or events can be proven to have 4.32 SA 4.45 AS 4.38 SA
taken place so that the events or actions
cannot be repudiated later.
The actions of an entity can be traced 4.36 SA 4.36 SA 4.36 SA
uniquely to the entity.
The identity of a subject or resource can be 4.37 SA 4.45 SA 4.41 SA
proved to be the one claimed.
OVERALL MEAN 4.33 SA 4.51 SA 4.42 SA

257
Petidentityapp: A Mobile Application With Emergency Rescue And Domestic Pet Adoption For Pet Paradise Ph NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Table 11: Level of Assessment in terms of Maintainability

Indicator Non - Experts Experts Composite

W.M. V.I. W.M. V.I. W.M. V.I.
A system or computer program is composed of 4.23 SA 4.64 SA 4.43 SA
discrete components such that a change to one
component has minimal impact on other
components.
An asset can be used in more than one system, 4.23 SA 4.45 SA 4.34 SA
or in building other assets.
The effectiveness and efficiency with which it is 4.21 SA 4.45 SA 4.33 SA
possible to assess the impact on a product or
system of an intended change to one or more of
its parts, or to diagnose a product for
deficiencies or causes of failures, or to identify
parts to be modified.
A product or system can be effectively and 4.16 A 4.45 SA 4.31 SA
efficiently modified without introducing defects
or degrading existing product quality.
The effectiveness and efficiency with which test 4.16 A 4.55 SA 4.35 SA
criteria can be established for a system, product
or component and tests can be performed to
determine whether those criteria have been met.
OVERALL MEAN 4.20 SA 4.51 SA 4.35 SA

The last indicator is accountability, or how the system is de-
signed to make specified actions simpler. The result reveals that the
expert assessed this characteristic as 4.45 with the verbal meaning
of ”Strongly Agree”. And the non-expert has 4.37 with a verbal
interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”.
Table 11 shows the respondents’ degree of satisfaction with the
maintainability. Modularity, Reusability, Analyzability, Modifiabil-
ity, and Testability are the five indicators of maintainability. The
system is modular if it is intended to cover all of the needed activities
and user objectives. The expert evaluation in terms of Modularity
indicates a result of 4.64 with verbal interpretation of ”Strongly
Agree” on the other hand, the non-expert have a result of 4.23 with
verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”. Overall, the composite
average with linguistic interpretation of ”Strongly Agree” is 4.43.
Reusability is the second indicator in Maintainability. The tech-
nique that generates correct outcomes with the needed accuracy is
known as reusability. The result of the expert shows 4.45 whereas
the non-expert shows 4.23 with verbal interpretation of ”Strongly
Agree”. Overall, the composite average is 4.34 with verbal interpre-
tation of ”Strongly Agree”.
Analyzability is the third indicator in Maintainability. Analyz-
ability is the technique that generates accurate and precise out-
comes. The result of the expert shows 4.45 while the non-expert
shows 4.21 with verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”. Overall,
the composite average is 4.33 with verbal meaning of ”Strongly
Agree”.
Modifiability is the fourth indicator in Maintainability. The tech-
nique that generates correct outcomes with the requisite accuracy
is known as modifiability. The result of the expert shows 4.45
whereas the non-expert shows 4.16 with verbal interpretation of
”Strongly Agree”. Overall, the composite average is 4.32 with verbal
interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”.
The last indicator is Testability, or how well the system is de-
signed to make certain tasks easy. The result reveals that the expert
assessed this characteristic as 4.55 with verbal meaning of ”Strongly
Agree”. And the non-expert has 4.16 with verbal interpretation of
”Strongly Agree”.
Table 12 shows the respondents’ degree of satisfaction with
Portability. Portability has three indicators: adaptability, instal-
lation ability, and replaceability. Adaptability indicates that the
system is intended to cover all of the needed tasks and user ob-
jectives. The expert evaluation in terms of Adaptability indicates
a result of 4.73 with verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”, on
the other hand, the non-expert had a value of 4.23 with verbal in-
terpretation of ”Strongly Agree”. With a verbal interpretation of
”Strongly Agree,” the composite average is 4.48.
Installation ability is the second security indicator. The tech-
nique that generates correct outcomes with the requisite accuracy
is known as install ability. The result of the expert shows 4.55 while
the non-expert shows 4.23 with verbal interpretation of ”Strongly
Agree”. Overall, the composite average is 4.39 with a linguistic
interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”.
The third indicator is Replaceability, which means that the tech-
nology is designed to make particular tasks simpler. The result
reveals that the expert assessed this characteristic as 4.45 with the
verbal meaning of ”Strongly Agree”. And the non-expert has 4.12
with a verbal interpretation of ”Strongly Agree”. With the verbal
interpretation of “Strongly Agree”, the composite average is 4. 29.
It is shown in Table 13 that the Functional Suitability versus the
assessment of the type of respondents with a Computed Value of

258
NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea Jefferson Costales et al.

Table 12: Level of Assessment in terms of Portability

Indicator Non - Experts Experts Composite

W.M. V.I. W.M. V.I. W.M. V.I.
System can effectively and efficiently be 4.23 SA 4.73 SA 4.48 SA
adapted for different or evolving hardware,
software or other operational or usage
environments.
The effectiveness and efficiency with which a 4.23 SA 4.55 SA 4.39 SA
product or system can be successfully
installed and/or uninstalled in a specified
environment.
Product can replace another specified 4.12 A 4.45 SA 4.29 SA
software product for the same purpose in the
same environment.
OVERALL MEAN 4.20 SA 4.58 SA 4.39 SA

Table 13: Difference in Perception of Respondents

Variables Computedt-value Mean Difference pp - value Decision Interpretation

Functional Suitability 1.276 0.3075 0.206 Reject HO Not Significant
Performance Efficiency 0.780 0.1968 0.438 Reject HO Not Significant
Compatibility 0.225 0.0629 0.822 Reject HO Not Significant
Usability 0.922 0.2471 0.359 Reject HO Not Significant
Reliability 0.587 0.1558 0.559 Reject HO Not Significant
Security 0.611 0.1776 0.433 Reject HO Not Significant
Maintainability 0.355 0.3091 0.220 Reject HO Not Significant
Portability 0.314 0.3786 0.155 Reject HO Not Significant
Legend: If pp -value <0.05, reject HO

1.276 and p-value of 0.206 with a decision of Reject Ho and Interpre-
tation of Not Significant. Performance Efficiency versus the type of
respondents with a Computed Value of o.780 and p-value of 0.438
with a decision of Reject Ho and Interpretation of Not Significant.
Compatibility the type of respondents with a Computed Value of
0.025 and p-value of 0.822 and with interpretation of Not Significant
and the decision is Reject Ho. Usability the type of respondents
with a Computed Value of 0.922 and p-value of 0.359 with interpre-
tation of Not Significant and the decision is Reject Ho. Reliability
versus the type of respondents with a Computed Value of 0.587
and p-value of o.559 with interpretation of Not Significant and the
decision is Reject Ho. Security versus the type of respondents with
a Computed Value of 0.611 and p-value of 0.433 with interpreta-
tion of Not Significant and the decision Reject Ho. Maintainability
versus the type of respondents with a Computed Value of 0.355
and p-value of 0.220 with interpretation of Not Significant and the
decision is Reject Ho. Portability the type of respondents with a
Computed Value of 0.314 and p-value of 0.155 with interpretation
of Not Significant and the decision is Reject Ho.
have highlighted the positive effects of technology and social media
to improve the lives of humans [13-16], and these benefits can also
be cascaded to pets. On this app, you can post for two different
purposes which are rescue and adoption. Using the rescue filter
gives us a sense of urgency and attention just by viewing a specific
pet that needs a real-time rescue. The pet adoption filter gives us
the power to choose pets from the showcase, the researchers also
added an innovative feature which is you can add a pet profile
exclusively for pets that have a microchip.
In this paper, the system is designed and developed as a mobile
application using Android Studio and the Firebase Database online
database. The most successful feature of this system is its flexibility
and ease of use, which is essential to further development. It has
an appealing intuitive user interface as well as a user that can be
employed in a range of jobs in any shape or form for a completely
automated solution.
Future Researchers should expand the program built and explain
the benefits outside of Pet Paradise PH, as well as improve the
development of the project to make it more useful in the long run.

4 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Pet Paradise App derives from the animal shelter Pet Paradise PH.,
REFERENCES
[1] Campanilla B S.., Etcuban J. O., Maghanoy A. P., Nacua P. A., Galamiton N.S,
we did this to give importance and highlight to our beloved pets for (2022) Pet Adoption App To Free Animal Shelters https://journalppw.com/index.
full attention through the power of social media. Previous studies php/jpsp/article/view/10869/7019

259
Petidentityapp: A Mobile Application With Emergency Rescue And Domestic Pet Adoption For Pet Paradise Ph
[2] Del Rosario, L.R., Yango, A.,Dela Paz, R.C.,Margate, J.C.B.,May, E.R.P. Pet Animals:
To Own and To Love. Retrieved May 21, 2023 from
[3] https://www.uphsl.edu.ph/research/ARTS%20_%20SCIENCES/DEL%
20ROSARIO,%20Luz%20Remedios/Pet%20animals%20to%20own%20and%
20to%20love.pdf
[4] Driscoll, C. A., Macdonald, D. W., & O’Brien, S. J. (2009). From wild an-
imals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proceed-
ings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(Supplement_1), 9971–9978.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0901586106
[5] Dolling C. (2019). Visualizing U.S Animal Shelter Outcomes. Retrieved May 21,
2023 from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/210610218.pdf
[6] Goselin, C., Letson, K., McGuinniss, K., Walters, A. Does funding affect the
adoption and euthanasia rate of shelters?, The possibility of building a fully
functioning animal shelter at Rutgers University. Retrieved May 21, 2023 from
https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/38418/PDF/1/play/
[7] H. Trapero et al., “Using augmented reality (AR) in innovating pedagogy: Students
and psychologists’ perspectives,” ICCE 2020 - 28th Int. Conf. Comput. Educ. Proc.,
vol. 1, pp. 87–89, 2020.
[8] Malasig,J. (November 22, 2021). The Southeast Asia, Filipinos are most Inter-
ested in Owning Pet during pandemics.. Retrieved May 21, 2023 from https:
//interaksyon.philstar.com/hobbies-interests/2021/11/22/205048/in-southeast-
Asia-Filipinos-are-most-interested-to-own-pet-this-covid-19-pandemic/
[9] McCarthy, Megan & Taylor, Melanie. (2018). Emergency preparedness and plan-
ning for animals: a case study in the Blue Mountains, NSW. Australian Journal
260
NLPIR 2023, December 15–17, 2023, Seoul, Republic of Korea
of Emergency Management. 33. 50-56.
[10] McCarthy, M., & Taylor, M. (2018). Animal emergency management in South
Australia: A case study of the Sampson Flat bushfire. The Australian Journal of
Emergency Management, 33(2), 60–65. Retrieved May 21, 2023 from
[11] Mueller T. (2020) The Human response to Pet Rescue TV Commercials doi: https:
//doi.org/10.21071/pbs.vi9.12193
[12] Petmate Academy(2018). The Benefits of Microchipping. Retrieved May 21, 2023
from https://www.petmate.com/the-benefits-of-microchipping/article/a10080
[13] R. A. Ebardo, “Visibility and Training in Open Source Software Adoption: A
Case in Philippine Higher Education,” in 8th International Workshop on Computer
Science and Engineering (WCSE 2018), 2018, pp. 368–373.
[14] R. Ebardo, “The use of activity trackers for health empowerment and commit-
ment: the Philippine cycling perspective commitment: the Philippine cycling
perspective ”,” in 7th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering
(WCSE 2017), 2017, no. April, pp. 25–27.
[15] R. Ebardo and J. B. Tuazon, “Identifying Healthcare Information Systems Enablers
in a Developing Economy,” ICETAS 2019 - 2019 6th IEEE Int. Conf. Eng. Technol.
Appl. Sci., 2019.
[16] Trigg, J., Thompson, K., Smith, B., & Bennett, P. (2016). An Animal Just Like
Me: The Importance of Preserving the Identities of Companion-Animal Owners
in Disaster Contexts. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(1), 26–40.
doi:10.1111/spc3.12233
[17] Walsom, C. (2014). Microchipping: a brief history. Companion Animal, 19(6),
288–290. doi:10.12968/coan.2014.19.6.288