Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Procedurr::
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OF GAS FROM TEMPERATURE LOGS
Calculate ".:l. " from the temperature log using the formula:
Eotes tne -.,olumeu1c How 1ctt~ dHilC i>ll iCS 01d1tuite with the calcuhned \'&iu,e
of o; proceed horizontally to the intersection with the cu,ved c ontrol line; pro-
ceed ,.,ertically to read ~s production r;3te.
Ex.;.1rnpJe. Given : Assumi ng the temperature Jog shown on the adjacent page.: Te ..,.- 187.8;
T {"183.3; dD- 17
Solution: ,:i; .. t7; gis production... 17 MCFGPO
,\. 187.8 •183.3/ (187 .8- 183.3/ 17)-4 .51.2641- 11
Rema,ks. Thi$ method require s temper.11uce logging under dynamic producing conditions.
The rate of gas heating toward forma tion temperatutt' ( in terms of tempe,oture
gr3dient) as it moves up the- borehol e to the surfoce depends on the \'olume of
gas flo v,;·ing. Gas volume flow has been expressed by the abo\'e formula.
Negative temperature anomalies ftom the 11orma l gradient indicate gas e xpansion
a.nd therefore the presence of gas.
ln c ases where only one gas producing zooe is present, gas production may be
readil}' dete rmined by i urface meter. The major applicatjon for the described
system is in estimating How fro m multiple zones . Jn dealing with multiple pays,
one should remember that the gas being produced from lower zones may affect
the gradient opposite shallQ\\' gas-producing inte r...a ls .
200
5 10
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OF GAS FROM T EMPERATURE LOGS
20
I I
so
GAS PROOUCTION RATE - MCFO
I I I
100
'
200 500
II
'
1,000 2,000
'
6,000
-, 10,000
300
200
I
100 I ! I I I
100
·- ·
'
' ,--
so I I
,.,I, .--
- ' I
I
' so
L\
JO
I I I
30
20
II I"
V I
20
I V
I y - ~
I
1I'. . - I
10
I
,_
.,- ,., - ---i - -, '
'
, i,-..- 10
--- ·- - I
' ' ' I I
I I' I I I 5
10 20 so 100 200 500 1,000 2,000 S,000 10,000
GAS PRODUCTION RATE - MCFD
TEMPERATURE LOG
\
·- ,.
I I \
' : \
\\
'
" ~
I \ --~
I \
I
j
I
,,.,l.. '
.,,;:.~• - ..-1I, .-; , ,.
'q -4- ---1 \I \
_.,
_i,.-- ..~ .../ I-<
I I' \ i
I '
11100
'
'
"'
33 Log l n1,•rprc:1atio11 k.dt'1·..-m:..- Lh,ht fh od bovl..
- F'or:
CAPAC I TY OF HOLE, CASING ANO T UBING
~ emarks: Tubing s u:e describes the approxinwtt' inside d 1;;meter of the tubing. Ct,sirig
s ize describes the casing ouc.side- di;:imeter. T!le follow ing table ma>• be used
t0 determine the ins ide dia1nete1 of vMious c:..s i.ng types for calculating casing
capacity.
;,.,>,SII\G SllE
,1. 112 ..,
W~t(; lff (It, /11 1
ll 6
I () ( 111 .J
•1.09
, .oo
(;ASINC $11.F,
l,,.$8
',111,' EJ(,H T tlb. /ft.)
36 D
40.0
1.0 . ( lll.J
7.1!2
i'.72
13.5 3.92 ·t.l.O 1.61
-1Q.O i'.Sl
; ll.S 4.S,6
tJ.O 4,-19 9,S: li 29.3 906
15.0 -1.41 32 .3 9.00
lS.0 us 36.-0 '"2
iO,O ?I.M
;\. I ll.O S.IM -IJ.S $ 16
' l H'I
15,5
5.01
-1 95
47 0
SJ.>
!t 6!!
8.~
17.0 -1.89
10.0 4 1& ;O,.J ~ JU' 10. 19
23.0 4 67 "O.!> 10.05
,s 5 9.95
• 1s.n
t.!f. 0
5 52
5.4'2
5LO
55.5
9.$S
9.16
lO.O s..35
2J .O 5.2-1 ;.1. J 4 31).(l t i.IS
42.{I ll II,.~
~.~
" n b. H -1,.0 11.00
20.0 6.0S S4.0 t0.88
24. 0 $ ,9 2 60.0 10. 77
28.U S.i"'J
J:2.0 $.66 iJ-3. !l 4!! 0 l'> "">
S'l.5
-·'-
12.62
li'.O 6.~ 6 LO 12.52
'.'().0 1>•.i.6 6i!.O 12.42
23.n 6..l) 12.0 IUI
26.0 6.21!.
29.0
J 2.0
6.JS
b.0 9
•• s.; 0
65.0
l !d!!.
15.25
J5 O 6.00 15 0 1$, 12
JS.O 5.92 S-1.0 15.0l
i' .:, ,$ !Cl.ii U! :..'l' 00.0 IQ. 11
24 0 1.oz 94 0 19.12
:!&.-1 &.91
'.!Y.1 6.88 n SJ:U 2J.22
"'
39.0
6 76
6.62
103.0
114.(1
21.lJ
:!O.OJ
I
~
~
-
s-
CAPACITY OF HOLE., CASING OR TUBING
.-
10
HOl.E DIAMETER - INCHES
16 --
20 .
--
--
30 ,00
I
iz
r. 2 - ,, 0
e -· - v I.., ~
J,
•
2. 3
'"" • I:30
•5 ~
v
e 6
I..,,
l/ '•
....
::,
J
7
8 , I/ :
..
0
9
,o·
' • •
j
-
10
...."'""'
"
L '-
J
.,,_,
.."" 15
20
,
/
- - . - •
•
'
!
,,
"'
-
...,.."
I
26 f -
30
·- • 8
~
:;, •
-- - : m
~
40
J 0
J
50 : ~
7
...
~ ~
60
,.. r
..
~
10.
0
• ~ IJ I:.
";;= .,
.'
~
100
,_ -
'l 150 ._ _ (7 ,_,_ I I I I
- ,_
I -
•g, 200 I . 5
, :z,;o - ·'3
•",••' -
300
400,
- • 600 !• 2
"• 600.
..•:t
100.
:88
1000·
' 0 5 10 ,. ..
20
..
25 --
30
rr
HOLE DIAMETER - INCHEt-
FLUID VELOCITY VERSUS FLOW RATE
Injec tion or production rotes lll OOttels per day horn mc...asurc·d fluid veloc u;.y
(ft/ min) in vario us d iameter holes, casing, or tu.bing.
Pron-duce. Ence, the c ha rt on its abscissa with fJ u i(I velocity 1n ieet per minuH~: proceed
vertic{ll)y to the intetsection with the vaJue fct e-Hecti\'e diomet('r of the fluid
passageway ~t the point of log measwcml'nt; proceed horizonta lly to the or-
dinate a nd re c1d i luid !low rate i n barrels per day.
Remarks : The a ccompan>•~ng chart was 1.:ons trutted io, fluid l1ow through passag,e...,,ays ,">i
!ht" listed di ameters such as occurs 1,1·, he-n the- fl,ow inside a pipe i s monitored by
following radioac th•it}' tagged internal fluids with a tracer 1001 located outs ide
the pipe . The c:harl does not ta ke in10 c onsidt:"catio11 lhe ,educti on in effective
passage14•ay dia:meter c aused by the presence of a logging tool wi thin the flo,w
s tream inside the casing 01 tubi ng where lbe flow is being measured. (n such
c ases the vol um.e occupied by the tool at the point of me;:1surernent must be sub•
trac1ed from that of the hole with thi s calculated effect ive hole diameter used to
dete rmine fluid tlO'A' rate. The fo llowing table represents a solution of the {Ofm•
Ufa A =n-r2 and may be used as an aid in such c omputations . Simply subtract tlle
area represented by the loggi ng tool from that of the hole and use this effecti-.•e
area to establish the effecti,,e bole dhlmeter for entry into the accompanying
chart. Such correcti ons a,e not required for spi nner surveys because here tool
response has been pre-calibr;:1ted to the \'arious flow di ameterS.
J9$
tUft:O N l'tlrnte<-boofoJ!.i~ I .imitt:d L•..g lnteq1rc1i.1io1.1 Rc-r...re m;e Oa t11 H:mtlbuo~
-
FLUID V ELOCITY VERSUS F LOW RATE
FLUID V ELOCITY - FT./MIN.
1,000 •
·,.soo - ,.soo
>
~
·...-.,
0
....
~
0:
I
1,000 1,QQO
!..,
~
0
..,3
~
600 soo
Procedure:
SPINNER (FLOWMETER) SURVEY RESPONSE VERSUS FLUIO FLOW
Dete rmination of borehole Huid flow in barrels per d::iy and gallons pe r minute
E-n ter the prop('t s pinner (tool diameter) ch;;i.n on its abscissa with spinner re volu•
tions per minute; proceed vertjcally to the intersection with the correct hole
size.: proceed horizontally to re.id fluid flow in barrels per da)' .
Gi\·en : 1-3/ 4" spinoer tool; 290 s pinner ,e..,o lutions per minute; fluid flowing.
water
Solution: Fluid now ~i ,500 battels per da)'
Remarks. 'fh(• occompan>·ing charts were desi•Ioed for sur~·eys performed with the " ;werag~"
tMI stationo.r)' ,.'lt individutll le•:e ls with in the- -.,,;•ell wher(• Wolter is the iluid under
study.
Surveys performed in higher viscosity than w.-iter fl uids will result in optitnist k
appacent now \'-Olume \'ah1es. Surveys made in lower viscosity fluids wiJI result
in pessimistic apparent now \•olume values ,
Prefonioary flow1neter sur\·eys are geoeraHy made with the tool being withdrawn
from the hole ;at a steady rate ,o permit the selection of the various station
leveJs for obser\•ation of absol ute flow rote as telated to spinner rcvohrtioos
per minute.
~ 3 3
« <>
0
0 0
•
"
w
~ ;I>;
0
~
".,-
~ {
w
"')>
a:
«
"",.m
~
~ ~
0 m
0 "
0
~ ►
- 2 2 <
';
~ .
2 '000 10 20
SPINN ER SURVEY RESPONSE VERSUS FLUID FLOW
30
3½" SPINNER R£iVOt.UTIONS PER M INUH
40 50 60 70 80 90
,~
100
I
[
i-t:
~.
8. 2-000 I I I I I /I / 'f / ;..1 / /I .,.. I 12,0 DO
7 7 77 7 7 _:;, C
► .,,.
i 1,500 1.500 ~
"' "'"'
0
~
..
cc
~
.,r"
m
~
m
"'cca: "0
.." ____.,,.,.,.-· ---·
)>
<
1,000 1,000
_.--·
S'
r.
.----- ----·
=
;;
'd
~'
-----
CASI NG
;
• s,z,e
•"'
:r
500 500
.
7·"'
~
•;; ..
• s··
·~
•..
.
'l0 ~--- -,~-- - --,',--- - ~.cL,- - - ---,'.,~ - - - -,,L,- - - --'oo- ----'10'-----,•Lo-----..,..,.----,,,.,0&
0 10 20 ,u
•• ••
°' 3¼'' SPINNER REVOLU'T IONS PER MtNUTl
",.~
i
:;
;:
-
e,
~ 6,000
o 10 ~
SPINNER SURVEY RESPONSE VERSUS FLUID FLOW
JO
4½.. SPINNER REVOLUTIONS PER MINUH.
~ ~ eo ro ~ ~ ~
I
S,000
~
~
;::
s.
a
••
000
I I I I I I I I I 7 / L.. ,.,.,..- J
..
►
0 3,000
3,000
..,,,,,.
~
"w m
..
G..
r
w!:J
w .,"'
.."" "'
0
►
<
r
~
2,000
2,000
•
•
-•'
~
;;
i'
"
"
,.;;''
1,000
1,000
,."=
_
CASING
lt1_7E
Ii
.---
,..
;
!I;
..
•= 7·"
..
l 00
5'"..........
" 10 :ao JO ~ 50 60 70 80 90
0
100
4½" SPINNER AEVO:LUTIONS PEA MINUTE
CASING 0 .D., WEICHT, ANO WALL THICKNESS RELATIONSHIPS
F.stirn;:iting cas ing wei~ltt from c.ising 0 .{). ;:ind wall rhicknl's!:-
Estirna ting casing waJJ tbtckness from c;:isi11g o.n. and weight
Procedw~. ·ro determine c-osiog wall thi<::k(H.,$5 . enter tl!e ,chsn Otl its ord1n;)C1: "-ltl1 Ct-JS111g
O.f>. in inches; p,oc:eed horizonto.Jly 10 the inte ,sc:.•ct ion with a ve r lica l projected
from casing weip) 11 as re~d from the abs issa; resd c;:asing \\'all thi ckness from
lht.' diagon;:iJ lines.
' l'o dt.· ll·rmin e c.i.si ng 1.1:e ighl. e nter t he c h.art on its Otdi nate wit h c-i1sing O .U. lo
inches; proceed horizontally to t he inte1sectior1 with the p,opcr casing thicknP. SS
diagonal ; proceed vertic nlly to re;)d c asing weight in pounds per foo t.
Gh·en: Ca !:.ing 0 .0.- 5-1/ 2"; c asing wei~ht =l4 pounds per foot
SoJution: C~sin~ wall thicknes s =-.245"
Remtuks : K no.,1.-Jed~e of casing thickness ?S i mpor tant to dete rr11inc gamma 1ay (-lbso .rp11c111
(·aused by c osing, for the- dt•lt!rmi nation of exa ct ca.si11g LD . for the sc-Jt:cl ion
of brid~•,(' plug a nd packer $izes. and to e st~bJish flow rates from fhud flow
profi l e s urve-ys .
- ,o
CASING 0 .0., WEIGHT, WALL THICKNESS RE LA TIONSHI PS
IS 20
CASING WEIGHT - POUNOS/ FOOT
25 30 35 40
I I
I\ f\ 1\ f\
l\ f\ \ f\ f\ [\ f\ I I
I\ ' '
4
[\f\l\' f\ '0 I
'
I
I
4
I
\ ' I\
' \ I\
' I\
\.
I I
I
' ' ' - -· I
'' I\ I
),., I
I\ " s
I
'\
\ \I 1\ 1' ~' ' I I I
I I\! I I
v)" 6
~ I\ I\ \ ',. I I
~
w \
% ' \ I\ \ \
\
'.i I\ I
. \ \ \ \ I\
I
I I , I I\ I ,
. 0.20"' o2S" c,.30•
.
0-15,. OAO'"
. .
~,45•· I o1 }.)0.. CASING WALL THICK.HE$$
r
7
\ I\
\I I
,I
\
\ ;\ }1, \
' I
'' \
\
1\
I
• I
f\
\
\I '\ \
•
I
t'J !,
\
I\
\
I
\
\
'\
9
I \1
\ f\ f\ '\I I\
9
\
I I\ I\
..,. I \ I
I \ \
I'\ ,
I
j ;
\
I\
\j
I\
I\ \ \ "" I 10
•I \ I' \ \ I\
I \
\
\
I\
I\
\
.
• \ \
I\ I\ \
\I\ I\
\ \ I'
10 15 20
' 25 30 JS 40 45
20.S
- Poe:
TOOL ASSEMBLY WEIGHT REQU IRED TO ENTER WELLS AT VARIOUS WELL
Proc-c:ducc :
HEAD PRESSURES
Ente r t he cho n 011 its ordinal~ with well head press ure; proceed tionzontail )' w
the intetsection with the appropria te ca ble d iamete r; proceed \'e rt ic::a lly to the
absissa and r,ead approxi mate wei ght of U1e tool a$sembly required to enter t he
well.
E>cample: Given: Well head pres s ure-=l,OOOpsi; ca ble dismeter- 15/ 32''
Solution: A,pproxim;;ite 1001 ossetr.bl y weight required to e nter tht '-''t:ll - 193
pounds
Remarks , The chMt is intended as an aid io es timat ing tbe required s inker ba r weight and
lubrica tor si,i e for entry imo pres sured wells .
'f'he term " tooJ assembly" includes the total weight of too1s, s inker be.rs and
c.ab!e be low t he ""-ell contro l head .
A-s c:ables he-c ome worn. the ir diru,:ctcrs wilJ decrease and the outside s urfacE:
will bec:ome ..i,ore s mooth, caus ing a reduced d.is toct ion of packing rubber into the
voids between cable armor strands . As a result a cable may require Jess sinker
bar weight wit h tltntinued usage, part icuJarJy if it has beco maintai ned in good
condit;on.
-
TOOL ASSEMBLY WEIGHT REQUIRED TO ENTER WELLS
AT VARIOUS WELL HEAD PRESSURES
(ESTIMATED VALUES)
APPROXIMATE WflGHT REQUIRED TO E NTER W~LL - POUNDS
I -
14 1--- ---l--+-+-+- + - -f.+-----l---+--+--+--t'-l- 14
13 r-----+-+--J-+--+-,
I -- ,-- .-I
/<-t---1---~ - f--
I
- ' 13
11 >-- -+-I- / 11
"'ii'!
207
- For:
Pr<Xedute:
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CEMENT FROM CEMEIH BOND LOGS
E nter the chart on t he left half of its abscissa with Ute amplitude curve Vtllue :in
chart di\•is ioos;. proceed vertic-3Uy to the intersection with the diagonal repre•
senting the number of chart di\'isions o bsen•ed opposite "hee" casing; proceed
horizontall)• to the intersection with the appropriate c:asing thickness valu,e;
proceed vertic.aUy to read cement compressive strength.
Example: Given: L-og amplitude v-dlue: 1.25 chan di\'isions; free cas ing signal- 16 div.i•
si ons; casing wall lftic::kness-=0. 44"
Solution: Cement compressive. st,ength=2,1SOpsi
Remarks: Calculated c:ompressivt strength of cement is for Utl' time of logging only. Com•
pressi\e strength of cement will iocre;.se rapidly after the- first few hours hom
ce menting and io maoy cases will not h~H·e rea ched a plateau after 48 hours or
longer. Tests have sho>,1,· n thtlt for shaJJow wel1 conditions the compressi11e
st1eng1h may nearly double within both the second and third eight bour intervals
after cementing. The coiopressi\•e strength ma>' still be increasing rapidly e ven
after 100 bows .
lnc:reai.ed tempe.rature. aod pres i.ure may caust' inc,eased compress ive strength
after a fixed setting time inter\'.l l.
1'he c ement mus t be well bonded to casing before the compressive s trength cr.n
be determined, o therwise a reduction in bonding would appear as an increase ~n
amplitude and a decrease in compressible strength.
'fbe. use. of neutron logging will increase the probability of correct interpretatloo
of cement bond log!'..
T he accoo1panying c hart \o\'aS constructed from data obtained with neat cement
tlfter 48 hours coring time and using a centralized logging tool.
JIJS
"~
j
"\"·
~
!.
i
~.
•,. ½, ..
~ '-ii ,.
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CEMENT FROM CEMEN T BOND LOG$
CHART 01VJSIONS
,,., 1 2 3 4 5'6 8 10 20 100
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH - f'SI
'
.""-lc- 1--e-'1'-l { _..,
!el
I : I I~ -
1-- 1
--t+t+tt-1-l~ - "·- ,. -
~
£
,.s
~~~•
~I ¼
1 UJ~1-~- C
1g.• I 1"
-~
, ~ II
I
r::::
"•~ "h
~ I I I I I ~~~tml-~1
-l-l-l+!-1+1--1-l>----+----<-; - -l I I I I·•
,,~
•
•
= -,-, ... ~ 1- 1-
=
•il 1/ll 1/1& 1,i 1/
4 'h 1 2 3 4 S6 810 1.0 100 500 1,000 2.000 3,000 4,000
f Ol4RT DtVl$1016 C0MPRE$$1VE STRENGTH . PSI
'