Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sustainable Development:
p DAO 96-37
p DAO 2003-30
Environmentally Critical Projects (ECPs)
p Heavy industries
• Non ferrous metal industries
• Iron and steel mills
• Petroleum and petrochemical industries, including oil and gas
• Smelting plants
p Resource extractive
• Major mining and quarrying industries
• Forestry projects
• Fishery projects
p Infrastructure projects
• major dams
• major reclamation projects
• major power plants
• major roads and bridges
p Golf course projects (Proclamation No. 803 of 1996)
Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)
i. All areas declared by law as national parks, watershed reserves, wildlife
preserves, and sanctuaries
ii. Areas set aside as aesthetic tourist spots;
iii. Areas which constitute the habitat for any endangered or threatened
species of indigenous Philippine wildlife (flora and fauna)
iv. Areas of unique historic, archeological or scientific interest
v. Areas which are traditionally occupied by cultural communities or tribes
(indigenous cultural communities)
vi. Areas frequently visited and/or hard-hit by natural calamities (geologic
hazards, floods, typhoons, volcanic activity, etc.)
vii. Areas with critical slopes
viii. Areas classified as prime agricultural lands
ix. Recharged areas of aquifers
x. Water bodies tapped for domestic purposes; within the controlled and/or
protected areas; support wildlife and fishery activities
xi. Mangrove areas
xii. Coral reefs
Objectives of DAO 2003-30
(PD 1586)
Ø Revised
the Procedural Manual issued under MC
2005-01 issued on 05 January 2005
Ø Revised
Guidelines for Coverage Screening under MC
2014-005 issued on 07 July 2014
Main Features of Philippine EIA
Requirements
• Scoping as a requirement
• Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Initial
Environmental Examination (IEE) and IEE Checklist
• Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA)
• Timetable for review of EIS/IEE
• Accountability of proponents and preparers
• Public participation and social acceptability
• Environmental monitoring and guarantee fund
• Review Cost
EIA Process in Relation to Enforcement
of other Laws
• Supplementary and complementary to other existing
laws
• Identifies the likely issues or impacts (maybe covered by
other environmental permits and other regulatory
bodies’ permitting requirements)
• Fills the gap and provides appropriate cover for
environmental protection and enhancement related
actions
EIA Process in Relation to other
Agencies’ Requirements
Water Solid Forestry & Agriculture Zoning Water Air Housing Mining Fisheries
Usage Waste Protected Pesticides Pollution Pollution
Areas
Group II Non Environmentally Critical Projects but located in ECAs IEE or full
(Environmentally Critical Areas) EIA
LEGEND:
Proponent
EIA Study / Report preparation by Project
P
Driven Proponent as a requirement for ECC application
U
DENR-EMB
Change B
Driven Project L
plan / I
Proponent REVIEW & EVALUATION of EIA as C
Options Relocate facilitated by DENR-EMB
Project
Not Part of
EIA Process
p legal
(or policy) definition of proposals to which
EIA does or does not apply;
p inclusionlist of projects (with or without
thresholds) for which an EIA is automatically
required; exclusion list of activities which do not
require EIA because they are insignificant or are
exempt by law (e.g. national security or
emergency activities); and
p criteria
for case-by-case screening of proposals
to identify those requiring an EIA because of
their potentially significant environmental effects
ADB and WB Environmental
Categorization for Screening
Category Project Attributes
Category A A proposed project is likely to have significant adverse
environmental impacts that are irreversible, diverse, or
unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the
sites or facilities subject to physical works. An environmental
impact assessment is required.
Category B A proposed project has potential adverse environmental impacts
which are less adverse than those of category A projects. These
impacts are site-specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and in
most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily
than for category A projects. An initial environmental examination is
required.
Category C A proposed project is likely to have minimal or no adverse
environmental impacts. No environmental assessment is
required although environmental implications need to be reviewed.
Category F1 A proposed project involves investment of ADB / WB funds to or
through a financial intermediary
World Bank Environmental Screening
JBIC Environmental Categorization
Category Project Attributes
Category A A project is likely to have significant adverse impact on the
environment or a project with complicated impact or
unprecedented impact which are difficult to assess. The
impact of Category A projects may affect an area broader
than the sites or facilities subject to physical construction.
Category B A project has potential adverse environmental impact which
is less adverse than that of Category A. Typically, this is
site-specific, few if any are irreversible and in most cases
normal mitigation measures can be designed more readily.
Category C A project is likely to have minimal adverse environmental
impact; also includes projects for which JBIC’s share is not
above SDR10million; sectors or projects in which no
particular environmental impact would be normally
expected; there is only minor involvement of the project by
the borrower or JBIC
Category F1 JBIC’s funding of the project is provided to a financial
intermediary.
DENR Screening and Scoping
Forms
MC 2014-05
Scoping form
SCOPING
p design the scoping process for each proposal, taking into account
the environment and people affected;
p specify the role and contribution of the stakeholders and the public;
• study area or impact zone(s) (e.g. the affected environment and community);
• alternatives to be examined;
• the studies to be carried out (e.g. approach, time & space boundaries);