CIE and SEE Assessment Assessment Mode Duration Max Marks

Methodologies CIE Assessment In hours

Week 3 CIE 1– Written and practice test 4 30
Week 5 CIE 2– Written and practice test 4 30
Week 8 CIE 3– Written and practice test 4 30
Week 10 CIE 4– Written and practice test 4 30
Week 12 CIE 5– Written and practice test 4 30
Week 13 Assessment for Project or 4 30
Internship
On line Course work (At least one related to the specialization) 30
Portfolio evaluation (Based on industrial assignments and weekly 30
developmental assessment) *
TOTAL CIE MARKS (A) 240
SEE 1 - Theory exam (QP from BTE) Conducted for 100 marks 3 hour 3 60
duration reduced to 60 marks
SEE 2 – Practical 3 100
TOTAL SEE MARKS (B) 160
TOTAL MARKS (A+B) 400
Case 5 4 3 2 1 Student Score
Submission /
Content
Evaluation
Rubrics
Evaluation
Parameters
Identification of Identifies and Identifies and Identifies and Identifies and Identifies limited 5
the main understands all the understands most understands some understands a few issues
issues / problem main issues in the of the main issues in of the issues in the of the issues in the in the problem
problem statemen the problem problem statement problem statement statement
statement
Analysis of the Insightful and Thorough analysis Superficial analysis Incomplete analysis No analysis of the 4
issues thorough analysis of of most of the issues of some of the of the issues issue
all the issues issues in the
problem statement
Comments on Well documented, Appropriate, well Superficial and / or Little and/or No action to all 2
effective reasoned and thought out inappropriate inappropriate issues in the
solutions / pedagogically comments about solutions to some of solutions to all of problem statement
strategies (The appropriate solutions, or the issues in the the issues in the
solution may be in comments on proposals for problem statement problem statement
the problem solutions, or solutions, to most of
statement already proposals for the issues in the
or proposed by solutions, to all problem statement
you) issues in the
problem statement
Links to course Excellent research Good research and Limited research Incomplete No research or links 3
learning and into the issues with documented links and documented research and links to any reading
additional clearly documented to the materials links to any to any reading.
research links to course read during the readings
learnings and course
beyond.
Total 14/20
Case 5 4 3 2 1 Student
Presentation Score
Evaluation
Rubrics
Evaluation
Parameters
Delivery & Very clear and concise flow Clear flow of ideas Most ideas flow Hard to follow the No flow in the 5
Enthusiasm of ideas Demonstrates but is lost flow of presentation
Demonstrates passionate interest in the at times ideas Poor presentation
interest in the topic and topic and Limited evidence Lack of enthusiasm skills
engagement with class / engagement with of interest and
examiner class / examiner in and interest
engagement with
the
topic
Visuals Visuals augmented and Use of visuals related Limited use of No use of visuals Poor visuals used 4
extended comprehension of to the visuals and some
the issues in unique ways topic loosely related to visuals are not easy
the topic to
understand its
relevance.
Staging Uses stage effects such as Uses stage effects Limited use of No use of stage Poor stage effects 2
props, sound effects, and such as stage effects effects usage
speech modulation in a props, sound effects, and/or used in a
unique and dramatic and manner
manner that enhances the speech modulation in that did not
Understanding of the issues an enhance the
in the problem statement. effective manner to understanding of
extend the issues
the understanding of in the problem
the statement.
issues in the problem
Statement.
Involvement of Excellent and Questions and Questions and Little or no attempt Did not engage the 3
the class/ salient discussions discussions to class /
Examiners discussion points addressed addressed engage the class / examiner and poor
Questions that important important examiner listening
Discussions elucidated material information that superficial issues of in demonstrating skills
Activities to developed the their
develop a deep understanding problem statement learning
understanding Appropriate Limited use of
Appropriate and activities used activities to
imaginative to clarify clarify
activities used to understanding understanding
extend
understanding in a
creative
manner
Total 14/20
Case Results 5 4 3 2 1 Students Score.
Evaluation
Rubrics
Evaluation
Parameters
Problem outcome The topic was well The topic was The topic was The topic was Desired results not 5
researched researched and researched but researched and obtained,
and all information most information information and data were not from but some relevant
and data and data data were reliable research
included are were from reliable only partly from sources. was done.
accurate and from sources of reliable The proof was not Outcome not
reliable sources of information. sources of backed up obtained as per
information The proof was information. with data, analysis the problem brief
like high impact backed up with The proof was not or
journals good data and fully backed reasoning as taught
standards, etc. reasoning as up with good data in the
The proof was taught in the class. or reasoning class.
enough backed Outcome achieved as taught in the Some outcome
up with accurate as per the class. obtained as per
data, analysis problem brief Partial outcome the problem brief
and reasoning achieved as
beyond the class per the problem
learning. brief
Outcome achieved
Application of Made effective use Made good use of Made some use of Made limited use of Poorly applied class 4
class learning in of class class class class principals,
problem solving principles, models principles, models principles, models principles, models models and theories
and theories and theories and theories and theories
Also used creativity Some creative ideas No creative ideas or
to find were models
effective results explored to find explored
appropriate to desired
industry beyond outcome but within
 class learning. the
framework of class
learning.
Response to Excellent response Good response to Satisfactory Limited response to Poor or no 2
Class/Examiners to questions response to questions response to
Queries. to Class / comments and and discussions questions and and discussions questions and did
Examiners `Quries discussion with with some discussions with with no not
appropriate connection made to limited reference to reference to participate in the
content supported theory/research theory/research theory/research discussions.
by theory/research
Conclusions ions Provides detailed Provides Provides adequate Provides limited Has not provided 3
and appropriate and mostly and appropriate
appropriate conclusion for the appropriate somewhat conclusions for the
conclusion for the problem conclusions for the appropriate problem
problem statement statement problem statement conclusions for the statement.
problem
statement
Total 14/20

Case Innovation 5 4 3 2 1 Student Score

Evaluation
Rubrics
Evaluation
Parameters
Finding new The newly The newly The newly The newly No new processes / 5
processes / discovered discovered discovered discovered models /
models / processes / processes / processes / processes / approaches were
approaches models / models / models / models / identified
approaches are of approaches are of approaches have approaches has
good quality and appropriate quality limited application restricted
relevant but limited but relevant to the application
relevance problem
Proposing ideas Various ideas and Various ideas and Some ideas or Few ideas have No ideas or 3
and innovative innovative innovative innovative been proposed innovative
solutions in terms solutions have been solutions have been solutions have been solutions have been
of processes / proposed and their proposed as well as proposed but the proposed
models / application have the outline of the process of applying
approaches and been clearly process to apply them hasn't been
how they can be outlined them specified
applied to solve
the problem on
hand
Using creativity Wherever Creativity Creativity Creativity Creativity 2
techniques to necessary creativity techniques are techniques are techniques are used technique are not
provide and techniques are frequently utilized utilized at times in a few times only utilized to analyse
reason good ideas utilized to analyse in more than 50% less than 50% of and solve the
which are original and solve the of the occasions the occasions problem
and problem
unconventional
Finding Constraints and Constraints and A critical analysis is Only a description No constraints or 3
constraints and weak points are weak are identified undertaken of the working weak points have
weak points in understood process and been identified.
existing methods are
processes / provided
models /

approaches or methods
Total 13/20
Assessment framework for CIE (1 to 5)
Note : Theory to be conducted for Electronics & Communication Semester V
1 hour and practice for 3 hours, Engineering
total duration of exam – 4 hours
Programme
Course Industrial Internet of Things Max Marks 30
(IIoT)
Course Code 20EC52I Duration 4 hours
Name of the course coordinator
Note: Answer one full question from each section.
Qn.No Question CL CO PO Marks
L3/L4
Section-1 (Theory) – 10 marks
1.a)
b)
2.a)
b)
c)
Section-2 (Practical) - 20 marks
3)
4)
Assessment framework for SEE 1 (Theory)
Programme : Electronics & Communication Engineering
Semester : V
Course : Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Max Marks : 100
Course Code : 20EC52I Duration : 3 Hrs Instruction to the Candidate: Answer one full question from each section.
Q.No Question CL CO Marks
Section-1
1.a) 1
b)
2.a)
b)
Section-2
3.a) 2
b)
4.a)
b)
Section- 3
5.a) 3
b)
6.a)
b)
Section-4
7.a) 4
b)
8.a)
b)
Section-5