Needs Improvement (2

Criteria Excellent (5 pts) Good (4 pts) Satisfactory (3 pts) pts) Unsatisfactory (1 pt) Not Attempted (0
The group selected a highly The group chose a somewhat
relevant and representative The group selected a relevant literary piece, but its The group's choice of a
literary piece that effectively relevant literary piece that connection to the literary piece has little The group did not identify or No attempt was m
Identification of reflects the culture of the gives insights into the municipality's culture is relevance to the discuss a literary piece from to identify a literar
Literary Piece municipality. culture of the municipality. unclear. municipality's culture. their municipality. piece.
The group delivered a
compelling and well- The group's presentation The group's presentation was The group's presentation
organized presentation, was clear and organized, somewhat clear, but some key lacked clarity and coherence, The presentation was
effectively conveying the key effectively presenting the elements of the literary piece making it challenging to disorganized and failed to No attempt was m
Presentation of elements of the literary main aspects of the literary were not effectively understand the literary convey the key elements of the to present the liter
Literary Piece piece. piece. communicated. piece. literary piece. piece.
The group created a The group's chant was The group's chant was
captivating and culturally rich engaging and provided a somewhat engaging, but it The group's chant was
Introduction chant that effectively satisfactory introduction to lacked cultural richness or was unremarkable, lacked The group did not create an No attempt was m
Chant in Local introduced the municipality the municipality in the local unclear in introducing the cultural relevance, or was introduction chant in the local to create an
Language in the local language. language. municipality. challenging to understand. language. introduction chant
The group did not
The group effectively The group slightly exceeded manage time
managed time, staying within The group adhered to the the time limit or finished The group exceeded the The group's presentation was appropriately, resu
Time the 5–8-minute presentation presentation time limit with significantly earlier but still time limit by a considerable significantly shorter than the in an incomplete
Management limit. minor deviations. within an acceptable range. margin. minimum time requirement. presentation.

Most group members

All group members actively actively participated,
participated, demonstrating demonstrating good Some group members were Few group members actively Minimal collaboration and No evidence of
excellent collaboration and collaboration and less engaged, affecting the participated, negatively engagement were evident, collaboration or
Collaboration engagement throughout the engagement during the overall collaboration and impacting collaboration and significantly impacting the engagement amon
and Engagement presentation. presentation. presentation quality. presentation effectiveness. quality of the presentation. group members.
Overall Impact The presentation left a lasting The presentation was The presentation had a The presentation lacked a The presentation had minimal No presentation w
impression, effectively impactful, providing insights moderate impact, but some significant impact, making it impact, failing to effectively made, or the conte
conveying the cultural

Criteria Excellent (5 pts)
significance of the literary
piece and the municipality.
Good (4 pts)
into the cultural aspects of
the literary piece and the
municipality.
Needs Improvement (2
Satisfactory (3 pts) pts) Unsatisfactory (1 pt) Not Attempted (0
aspects could have been challenging for the audience communicate the cultural
better conveyed for a more to grasp the cultural significance of the literary was completely
profound understanding. elements presented. piece and the municipality. irrelevant.