Initial Visit Scoring Guide

Supplier
Location
Reviewer
Date
Score Actual Score
Topic Points to consider Weight
0 1 2 0-2
Vision evident but not
Company Vision none concrete well defined & articulated 25% 2

Customer Service Poor Moderate Excellent 25% 2

Management &
Organization Manufacturing, tech Not capable Moderately capable Highly capable 25% 2
capability

Ethics, integrity Unethical Highly Ethical 25% 2

Subtotal 100% 100.00%

No experience in
Products commodities relevant to Moderate experience Good experience 20% 2
DOVER OpCo

Some CNC and some

Operations Conventional conventional Fully CNC 20% 2

Manufacturing
Few machines are new new machines, well
Processes & Equipment, age old, not maintained and few are old maintained 20% 2
Capabilities

Capacity 100%; 0% 20 - 40% 40 - 60% 20% 2

Works only on high Works only on low volume Experience both in high
Volume mix volume products products and low volumes 20% 2

Subtotal 100% 100.00%

QA / QC process not evident, observable documented observable on floor 50% 2

Certifications none - ISO 9001 25% 2

Quality

Corrective action process No knowledge on

Moderate knowledge Good knowledge 25% 2
and root cause analysis Fishbone, 5 Whys,8D etc.

Subtotal 100% 100.00%

Evidences for VA/VE

VA/VE capability No evidence of VA/VE and cost savings 20% 2
observed

Some are degreed and

Engineering capability no degreed engineers some are not All engineers are Degreed 20% 2
Engineering &
Technical
Prototyping, First article limited/no capability Good experience 20% 2

Program management none dedicated PM 20% 2

Transition capabilities No one's job Dedicated individuals 20% 2

Subtotal 100% 100.00%

Provide Programs on Site Own/3PL Warehouse in
Inventory programs No Inventory program on Kanban, Stocking, VMI, USA,EU & provide various 20% 2
etc programs
Provided End to End
Logistics Program Use Customer logistics Provide Logistics Capability supply chain Solution 20% 2
Procurement, Sources from Authorised Sources from
Inventory & Raw material spend Source from Local Traders Distributors Manufactureres 20% 2
Logistics
Supply Chain risk High Medium Low 20% 2

No plans for having a Open to ideas about Already have a Warehouse

Location warehouse in USA warehousing in USA 20% 2

Subtotal 100% 100.00%

Customer base Limited to few customers Moderate Diversified 20% 2

Access to capital weak strong very strong 20% 2

Transparency in
Commercial quoting/price Poor Good Excellent 20% 2
competetiveness

Financial risk Poor Good Excellent 20% 2

Terms and Alignment with Poor Good Excellent 20% 2

Dover MOU
Subtotal 100% 100.00%
Total Score 100.00%
 AUDIT TYPE
SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE
AUDITOR
REPRESENTATIVE AUDITEE

OPERATIONS
Facility
Process Control
Production/Process Capabilities
Material Control
Sub supplier
Employee Health and Safety
Operations Total
QUALITY
Quality: Registrations / Certifications
Quality: Systems
Quality: Department Personnel Deployment
Quality Inspection Program
Quality Driven Programs
Quality Inspection (Lab or at workstation)
Gage Surveillance Program
Quality Total
ENGINEERING
Engineering Department Personnel Deployment
ENGINEERING Total
RISK & FINANCIAL
Risk Management
Financial
Risk & Finance Total

% Evidence Reviewed
Evaluation report is accepted
Total Score
Supplier Grade D
Audit conclusions #NAME?
Recommendations #NAME?
 NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

WEIGHT TOTAL
35%
20.0% 0%
20.0% 0%
20.0% 0%
15.0% 0%
15.0% 0%
10.0% 0%
100.0% 0.0%
40%
25.0% 0%
10.0% 0%
15.0% 0%
15.0% 0%
20.0% 0%
5.0% 0%
10.0% 0%
100.0% 0.0%
15%
100.0% 0%
100.0% 0.0%
10%
50.0% 0%
50.0% 0%
100.0% 0.0%

100.0%
d
0.0%
E?
 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

AUDIT TYPE NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE
AUDITOR
REPRESENTATIVE AUDITEE

OPERATIONS 35%
No. Facility Weight Score 0-4 Evidence Reviewed
Facility is clean, organized and is properly maintained to protect materials from outside
1 10.0% 0
elements?
Manufacturing equipment is clean, in good working order and characteristics measured
2 10.0% 0
were reproducible during an observed 10-pc consecutive production run?
Manufacturing test devices are clean, in good working order and characteristics previously
3 10.0% 0
tested were repeatable during an observed 10-pc run of random components?
4 5S disciplines deployed throughout production operations? 15.0% 0
No environmental condition exists in the manufacturing process that potentially could result
5 5.0% 0
in product non-conformity?
Capacity: Facility size is adequate to accommodate current customer base and Dover
6 5.0% 0
business opportunities?
Capacity: Facility has adequate expansion potential to accommodate future business
7 5.0% 0
opportunities with, or manufacturing requirements for Dover and customer base?
Does your company have all the required permits and licenses (e.g. environmental,
8 10.0% 0
business) to conduct operations at their facilities?
9 Total Productive Maintenance Program (TPM) deployed? 0
10 Preventive Maintenance Program (machinery, equipment, test devices, etc.) 10.0% 0
Continuous improvement program; work instruction, visual aids, error-proofing, etc.
11 20.0% 0
(annual review)
Facility Subtotal 100% 0%
Process Control Weight Score 0-4
12 Work instructions are deployed throughout production operations? 25.0% 0
13 Parameter charts, production checklists or logs are deployed throughout operations? 15.0% 0
14 Visual aids are deployed throughout production operations? 10.0% 0
15 In-process gages and/or test devices are deployed throughout production operations? 10.0% 0
16 Poke-yoke’s or error-proofing devices are deployed throughout production operations? 10.0% 0
Tool maintenance program is deployed? Program to include at a minimum, a database or
17 records indicating frequency of inspection, tool characteristics inspected, tool cycles at last 10.0% 0
inspection and expected tool life cycle and/or tool replacement interval

Tool control program is deployed? Program to include at a minimum, database or records

18 indicating tool control number, date of tool deployment, current tool location, replacement 10.0% 0
tooling availability and min./max. level maintained, including replacement tool location

Tooling adequately identified for ease in deployment and stored in a manner to prevent
19 unintended use or damage (to include adequate identification of tooling scheduled for 10.0% 0
refurbishment or scrap)
Process Control Subtotal 100.0% 0%
Production/Process Capabilities Weight Score 0-4
Poke-yoke’s, error proofing or “pass / fail” devices are deployed for all test devices
throughout manufacturing operations to validate correct operation of test device(s); results
20 30.0% 0
of the validation are recorded in a test log or database? (Note: validation of test equipment
should at a minimum frequency of twice per manufacturing shift)
Cycle times are posted at production operation or maintained in a database, and production
21 20.0% 0
operations observed are producing within the cycle time indicated?
Capacity: Processes capabilities can support an increase in production capacity on a short-
22 20.0% 0
term or long-term basis with minimal delay or concerns?

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 8 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

AUDIT TYPE NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE
23 Capacity: What is the current production or machine capacity of all production operations? 30.0% 0

Material Control Scope Subtotal 100.0% 0%

Material Control Weight Score 0-4
24 Material identification/tagging system deployed throughout production operations? 20.0% 0
Materials throughout manufacturing process are adequately identified with manufacture
25 date, manufacture lot number, part number, description, quantity, operator name or 20.0% 0
initials; the status of the material is clearly understood?
Materials in shipping area are adequately identified and the status of the material is clearly
26 15.0% 0
understood?
27 There are no scrap or suspect materials located in the shipping and receiving areas? 15.0% 0
All scrap or suspect materials are quarantined away from conforming product in production
28 areas and are identified in a manner to ensure the status of the material is clearly 15.0% 0
understood to prevent accidental re-introduction into manufacturing processes?

A designated quarantine area has been established to store scrap or suspect materials?
Location the designated area should be isolated away from production and shipping
29 operations; a material log should be deployed that clearly describes: manufacture date, 15.0% 0
manufacture lot number, part number, description, quantity, operator name or initials,
“date in” and “date out”

Material Control Scope Subtotal 100.0% 0%

Sub-Supplier Management Weight Score 0-4
30 Supplier has the capability to inspect all features of Subsupplier product(s) or service(s) 20.0% 0
31 Supplier has a sub supplier inspection protocol and actively follows it 20.0% 0
32 Supplier periodically identifies its strategic sub suppliers 15.0% 0
33 Strategic sub supplier quality and delivery performance is measured periodically 15.0% 0
Supplier actively works with sub suppliers on improvement when performance is not
34 15.0% 0
meeting expectatiions
35 Supplier conducts perioddic sub supplier business reviews 15.0% 0
Material Control Scope Subtotal 100.0% 0%
Employee Health and Safety Weight Score 0-4
36 Is there an EHS expert employed at or supporting the company/facility? 10% 0
37 Does your company conduct EH&S compliance audits? Who conducts the audit and how
10% 0
frequently?
38 Do you have training programs for your employees regarding EH&S matters? (including
30% 0
anything required by applicable laws and regulation)
39 Your company has operated without any fatalities or serious injury requiring hospitalization
20% 0
greater than 24 hours in the past 5 years?
40 Do employees have proper safety protection? (e.g. eye protection, safety shoes, hearing
30% 0
protection, breathing protection, machines guarded)
Employee Health and Safety Subtotal 100.0% 0%

QUALITY 40%
Quality: Registrations / Certifications Weight Score 0-4
41 Quality System Certified ? (ISO, AS, TS, IATF) (Acquire copy of certificate) 100.0% 0
42 ISO 14001:2004 registered? (Acquire copy of certificate) 0
43 ISO compliant only; possible long-term plans for registration? 0
44 Industry Affiliations; Professional Certifications (in lieu of ISO registration) 0
Supplier Registrations / Certifications Subtotals 100.0% 0%
Quality: Systems Weight Score 0-4
Describe your Quality Management System (QMS
45 Ex. Quality Manual, Procedures, Process Maps 50.0% 0

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 9 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

AUDIT TYPE NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE
Can we see your Quality policy & procedures manual (record revision date and revision level
46 at time of review) Revision Date: Revision Level: 50.0% 0
Supplier operates from a published and controlled subtotal: 100.0% 0%
Quality: Department Personnel Deployment Weight Score 0-4
Is there a member of the management team who is responsible for establishing,
47 implementing, and maintaining quality systems and processes? 50.0% 0

48 Desrcibe the organization chart of the quality department. 25.0% 0

49 What is the experience level of your quality inspectors? 25.0% 0
Does your organization support Six-Sigma training programs? If so, how many Green Belts,
50 Black Belts or Master Black Belts? 0

Quality Department Personnel Deployment Subtotal 100.0% 0%

Quality Inspection Program Weight Score 0-4
51 Describe receiving inspection process. 15.0% 0
52 Are inspection instructions avaiable for operators at each production station? 15.0% 0
53 Who does inspections during production? 15.0% 0
54 Describle your final inspection process. 15.0% 0
55 PPAP capability? Indicate Levels 10.0% 0
Supplier has the necessary quality controls in place to ensure material conformance to
56 10.0% 0
specifications?
57 Are customer’s drawings/specification readily available at inspection/test stations? 15.0% 0
58 Are inspection/test records maintained and available for review? 5.0% 0
Quality Inspection Program subtotal 100.0% 0%
Quality Driven Programs Weight Score 0-4
SPC program (or quality/inspection control plan) deployed and operators/QC personnel
59 5.0% 0
properly applying them?
Is there a non conforming material (NCM) location? Quarantined from production
60 15.0% 0
operations?
Material Review Board (MRB) is deployed for product non-conformance disposition and
61 20.0% 0
customer review and approval?
62 Internal corrective action program is deployed? 20.0% 0
63 Internal process/system audits performed? An audit schedule is required for review 5.0% 0
64 Can we review Production & Quality personnel training and records? 5.0% 0
What problem solving methodology does the supplier use? Supplier has capability to do 8D
65 15.0% 0
analysis or CAPA (Corrective & Preventive Actions)?
How do you track quality? PPM? What is your internal/external PPM? Or Internal/external
66 15.0% 0
reject rates
Quality Driven Programs Subtotal 100.0% 0%
Quality Inspection (Lab or at workstation) Weight Score 0-4
67 Standard measuring equipment deployed? (caliper, micrometer, dial indicator, etc.) 25.0% 0
68 Optical Comparator (in-use) 25.0% 0
69 Tensile Test or similar equipment (in-use); Chemical Analysis (in-use) 25.0% 0
70 CMM (in-use) 25.0% 0
Quality Inspection Lab subtotal 100.0% 0%
Gage Surveillance Program Weight Score 0-4
71 Personnel trained in gage application and use (annual review) 10.0% 0
Gage surveillance database in-use?
72 20.0% 0
If used, type: excel spreadsheet, gagetrak, gagepak, other. Is it available to review?
Gages in-use on production floor or lab are identified, calibrated and documented to
73 20.0% 0
internal procedures?
Gages in-use are clean, in good working order, within calibration and demonstrate
74 15.0% 0
repeatability?

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 10 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

AUDIT TYPE NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE
Gages in-use are sufficient to inspect all drawing characteristics and specifications
75 15.0% 0
adequately or correctly?
76 Replacement gages/devices are available to ensure production is not disrupted? 5.0% 0
77 All gages or devices are stored in a manner to prevent damage? 10.0% 0
78 Methodology used for gauge R&R, charts, etc 5.0% 0
Gage Survelliance Program subtotal 100.0% 0%

ENGINEERING 15%
Engineering Department Personnel Deployment Weight Score 0-4
Does your organization have an engineering department? If so, please descible the
79 25.0% 0
organization structure and the experience level of each engineer.
New product review program is deployed to review customer provided drawings and
80 specifications to ensure manufacturing processes are adequate or can support 15.0% 0
requirements?
81 Participate in FMEA's? Ability to do DFM, DFMA? 15.0% 0
Internal Deviation, Engineering Change Notification (ECN) or equivalent programs are
82 15.0% 0
deployed and utilized?
83 3D software in use? Indicate software type (AutoCad, Pro E, SolidWorks, Catia, etc) 15.0% 0
84 Does supplier have ECOC control (Engineering Control Change Process)? 15.0% 0
Enginerring Department Personnel Deployment 100.0% 0%

Risk and Financial 10%

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 11 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

AUDIT TYPE NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE
Risk Management Weight Score 0-4
85 Does supplier have a risk mitigation or written contingency plan? 5.0% 0
86 Has your company ever been investigated or fined for non-compliance with local laws? 10.0% 0
Does your company have trading relationship with a US embargoed, blacklisted & SDNT
87 20.0% 0
country (Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Sudan)?
Your company does not use or has never used persons who are below the local minimum
88 5.0% 0
legal age (and in no case less than 16 yrs) to manufacture any products?
There are no outstanding legal issues facing your company that could potentially hamper
89 25.0% 0
your ability to supply products to the company?
Are there internal policies and procedures for handling confidential/proprietary information
90 20.0% 0
belonging to company/customers?
91 Does facility/company have a history free of labor disputes with its employees? 15.0% 0
Risk Management subtotal 100.0% 0%
Financial Weight Score 0-4
92 Do you have a D&B no. or other 3rd party agency number or certificate? 0
93 Ask workers whether they get wages on time 0
94 Has company been profitable for the last three years 0
Does your company have an established line of credit with its bank? Amount and Amount
95 25.0% 0
available
Can your company operate without depending on your customers for working capital
96 50.0% 0
needs? (e.g. for inventory, equipment financing)
Can supplier provide an audited copy of the Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Cash
97 Flow Statement (English preferred)? If not, can they provide the data required in the 25.0% 0
Financial Data section?
Financial subtotal 100.0% 0%
Financial Data (not required if they provide audited statements)
Current/Prior year Info
Year
Sales revenue
Income before taxes
Current assets
Current liabilities
Average inventory value
Debt – short term
Debt – long term
Category Specific Questions Weight Score 0-4 Evidence Reviewed

Category Specific Questions total

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 12 04/12/2024

 Audit action plan
Deviati
Requirement Evidence Reviewed
on #
1 #NAME? #NAME?
2 #NAME? #NAME?
3 #NAME? #NAME?
4 #NAME? #NAME?
5 #NAME? #NAME?
6 #NAME? #NAME?
7 #NAME? #NAME?
8 #NAME? #NAME?
9 #NAME? #NAME?
10 #NAME? #NAME?
11 #NAME? #NAME?
12 #NAME? #NAME?
13 #NAME? #NAME?
14 #NAME? #NAME?
15 #NAME? #NAME?
16 #NAME? #NAME?
17 #NAME? #NAME?
18 #NAME? #NAME?
19 #NAME? #NAME?
20 #NAME? #NAME?
21 #NAME? #NAME?
22 #NAME? #NAME?
23 #NAME? #NAME?
24 #NAME? #NAME?
25 #NAME? #NAME?
26 #NAME? #NAME?
27 #NAME? #NAME?
28 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
30 #NAME? #NAME?
 Copy & insert Progress/Owner/Deadline columns to follow-up
progress.
Supplier corrective action Status Progress xx/xx/2022
r/Deadline columns to follow-up
Owner Deadline
For each question choose between 5 scores:
4 The supplier fully meets requirements.
3 Most required elements of the requirement are present with the possibility o
2 Supplier only partially meets the requirements;
1 Supplier meets a few of the requirements;
0 There is no evidence to support the requirements;
If the question is not applicable, type N/A in comments and offer full s
Please use the comment cell to provide information supporting the rating selected.

Scorec

Grade Overall Score Grade Evaluation Result

D < 70% D DISQUALIFIED

C (70-75)% C NOT RECOMMENDED

PROBATIONARY
B (75 - 80)% B
RECOMMENDED

A (80 - 85)% A RECOMMENDED

A+ > 85% A+ HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

Score

Grade Overall Score Grade Evaluation Result

D < 75% D NOT APPROVED

C >=75% C INTERIM APPROVED

B >=85% B APPROVED

A >=90% A BENCHMARK
A+ >=95% A+ EXCELLENT
are present with the possibility of minor finding

in comments and offer full score.

the rating selected.

Scorecard Key for potential supplier

Recommendations Risk

N/A Very High

N/A High

Supplier restrictions
necessary, measures must
Moderate
be defined, follow up audit
necessary

Measures must be defined,

action plan must be Low
delivered

Unrestricted released None or Low

Scorecard Key for existing supplier

Recommendations Risk

Supplier is disqualified ,
systematic measures must
Very High
be defined, follow up audit
is a must

Supplier restrictions
necessary, measures must
High
be defined, follow up audit
necessary

Measures must be defined,

action plan must be Moderate
delivered

Unrestricted released Low

Unrestricted released None or Low
y for potential supplier

Comments

Suggests quality-driven and training programs are non-existent in several key areas;
complete collapse of quality management system
Suggests very few quality-driven programs are implemented, significant improvements
must be made to quality management system; training programs are poor or non-existent
in several key areas

Suggests some quality-driven programs are implemented, extensive improvements to

quality management system must be made; training is deficient in several key areas

Suggests extensive quality-driven disciplines and high performing programs are

implemented; training programs are adequate and deployed throughout manufacturing
operations
Suggests extensive quality-driven disciplines and best-practices are implemented; and well-
planned high performing training programs are deployed throughout manufacturing
operations

ey for existing supplier

Comments

Suggests quality-driven and training programs are non-existent in several key areas;
complete collapse of quality management system

Suggests very few quality-driven programs are implemented, significant improvements

must be made to quality management system; training programs are poor or non-existent
in several key areas

Suggests some quality-driven programs are implemented, extensive improvements to

quality management system must be made; training is deficient in several key areas

Suggests extensive quality-driven disciplines and high performing programs are

implemented; training programs are adequate and deployed throughout manufacturing
operations
Suggests extensive quality-driven disciplines and best-practices are implemented; and well-
planned high performing training programs are deployed throughout manufacturing
operations
 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

AUDIT TYPE NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE
AUDITOR
REPRESENTATIVE AUDITEE

OPERATIONS 35%
No. Facility (Cơ sở Vật chất) Tỉ trọng Điểm (0-4) Hồ sơ (bằng chứng)
Continuous improvement program; work instruction, visual aids, error-proofing, etc.
(annual review)
11
(Chương trình cải tiến liên tục; hướng dẫn công việc, chống sai lổi,…có được đánh giá hàng
20.0% 3 0
năm)

Parameter charts, production checklists or logs are deployed throughout operations?

13 (Biểu đồ các thông số, checklists kiểm tra hoặc nhật ký có triển khai trong quá trình sản xuất 15.0% 4 0
không?)
In-process gages and/or test devices are deployed throughout production operations?
15
(Các thiết bị kiểm tra, đo kiểm có được triển khai trong suốt quá trình sản xuất không?)
10.0% 4 Có

Quality System Certified ? (ISO, AS, TS, IATF) (Acquire copy of certificate)
41
(Hệ thống chất lượng được chứng nhận? (ISO, AS, TS, IATF) (Nhận bản sao chứng chỉ)
100.0% 4 có

ISO 14001:2004 registered? (Acquire copy of certificate)

42
(Đã đăng ký ISO 14001:2004? (Nhận bản sao chứng chỉ) 0 Không

ISO compliant only; possible long-term plans for registration?

43
(Chỉ tuân thủ ISO; kế hoạch dài hạn có thể đăng ký không?) 4 có

Industry Affiliations; Professional Certifications (in lieu of ISO registration)

44
(Các liên kết trong ngành hoặc chỉ chỉ chuyên môn )Thay thế cho đăng ký ISO) 0 có
Describe your Quality Management System (QMS
Ex. Quality Manual, Procedures, Process Maps
45 (Mô tả Hệ thống quản lý chất lượng của bạn (QMS Ví dụ: Sổ tay chất lượng, Quy trình, Sơ đồ 50.0% 4 có
quy trình)

Can we see your Quality policy & procedures manual (record revision date and revision level
at time of review) Revision Date: Revision Level:
(Chúng tôi có thể xem sổ tay chất lượng và chính sách Chất lượng của bạn không (ghi lại
46
ngày sửa đổi và mức độ sửa đổi tại thời điểm xem xét) Ngày sửa đổi: Cấp độ sửa đổi:
50.0% 4 có

Is there a member of the management team who is responsible for establishing,

implementing, and maintaining quality systems and processes?
47 (Có thành viên nào trong nhóm quản lý chịu trách nhiệm thiết lập, thực hiện và duy trì các 50.0% 4 Có
hệ thống và quy trình chất lượng không?)

Desrcibe the organization chart of the quality department.

48 (Mô tả sơ đồ tổ chức của bộ phận chất lượng.) 25.0% 4 có
What is the experience level of your quality inspectors?
49 (Mức độ kinh nghiệm của thanh tra chất lượng của bạn là gì?) 25.0% 3 có
Does your organization support Six-Sigma training programs? If so, how many Green Belts,
Black Belts or Master Black Belts?
50 (Tổ chức của bạn có hỗ trợ các chương trình đào tạo Six-Sigma không? Nếu vậy thì có bao 0 Không
nhiêu Đai xanh, Đai đen hay Đai đen bậc thầy?)

Describe receiving inspection process.

51
(Mô tả quá trình tiếp nhận kiểm tra.)
15.0% 3 có

Who does inspections during production?

53
(Ai kiểm tra trong quá trình sản xuất?)
15.0% 4 có

Describle your final inspection process.

54
(Mô tả quá trình kiểm tra cuối cùng của bạn)
15.0% 4 KT trước xuất hàng

Are inspection/test records maintained and available for review?

58
(Hồ sơ kiểm tra/thử nghiệm có được lưu giữ và sẵn sàng để xem xét không?)
5.0% 4 Có

SPC program (or quality/inspection control plan) deployed and operators/QC personnel
properly applying them?
59
(Chương trình SPC (hoặc kế hoạch kiểm soát chất lượng/kiểm tra) đã được triển khai và
5.0% 4 Có
người vận hành/nhân viên QC có áp dụng chúng đúng cách không?)

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 22 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

AUDIT TYPE NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE
Internal corrective action program is deployed?
62
(Chương trình hành động khắc phục nội bộ có được triển khai?)
20.0% 4 CÓ

Can we review Production & Quality personnel training and records?

64
(Chúng tôi có thể xem xét hồ sơ và đào tạo nhân sự Sản xuất & Chất lượng không?)
5.0% 4 Có
Standard measuring equipment deployed? (caliper, micrometer, dial indicator, etc.)
67 (Triển khai thiết bị đo tiêu chuẩn? (thước cặp, micromet, chỉ báo quay số, v.v.) 25.0% 4 Có
Optical Comparator (in-use)
68 (Bộ so sánh quang học (đang sử dụng)) 25.0% 4 Có
Tensile Test or similar equipment (in-use); Chemical Analysis (in-use)
69 (Kiểm tra độ bền kéo hoặc thiết bị tương tự (đang sử dụng); Phân tích hóa học (đang sử 25.0% 3 Có
dụng))

Personnel trained in gage application and use (annual review)

71
(Nhân viên được đào tạo về ứng dụng và sử dụng thiết bị đo (đánh giá hàng năm))
10.0% 4 Có

Gage surveillance database in-use?

If used, type: excel spreadsheet, gagetrak, gagepak, other. Is it available to review?
72
(Cơ sở dử liệu được sử dụng để giám sát thiết bị đo lường? Nếu sử dụng thì gõ: bảng tính
20.0% 4 Có
excel, gagetrak, gagepak, loại khác. Có sẵn để xem xét?)

Gages in-use on production floor or lab are identified, calibrated and documented to
internal procedures?
73
(Các thiết bị đo đang sử dụng trên sàn sản xuất hoặc phòng thí nghiệm có được xác định,
20.0% 4 Có
hiệu chuẩn và ghi lại theo quy trình nội bộ không?)

Gages in-use are clean, in good working order, within calibration and demonstrate
repeatability?
74
(Các thiết bị đo đang sử dụng có sạch sẽ, hoạt động tốt, trong phạm vi hiệu chuẩn và có thể
15.0% 4 CÓ
lặp lại không?)

Does your organization have an engineering department? If so, please descible the
organization structure and the experience level of each engineer.
79
(Tổ chức của bạn có bộ phận kỹ thuật không? Nếu có, vui lòng mô tả cơ cấu tổ chức và trình
25.0% 4 Có
độ kinh nghiệm của từng kỹ sư.)

New product review program is deployed to review customer provided drawings and
specifications to ensure manufacturing processes are adequate or can support
requirements?
80
(Chương trình đánh giá sản phẩm mới được triển khai nhằm xem xét các bản vẽ, thông số kỹ
15.0% 4 Có
thuật do khách hàng cung cấp nhằm đảm bảo quy trình sản xuất đã đầy đủ hoặc có thể hỗ
trợ các yêu cầu?)

Participate in FMEA's? Ability to do DFM, DFMA?

81 (Tham gia vào FMEA?(Phòng ngừa rủi ro tiềm ẩn) Khả năng làm DFM(thiết kế cho sản xuất), 15.0% 3 Có
DFMA (thiết kế cho lắp ráp)?)

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 23 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

AUDIT TYPE NEW SUPPLIER EVALUATION

SUPPLIER NAME
SITE, COUNTRY
AUDIT DATE

Category Specific Questions total

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 24 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

Trách nhiệm

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 25 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

KTCL

Mỹ+Tạo + KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

KTCL

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 26 04/12/2024

 Supplier site visit Form - DRAFT

Supplier pre Audit template 03 06 12 27 04/12/2024