You are on page 1of 37

Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Special Process: Coating System Assessment Cover Sheet

Facility Name: Aum Dacro Coatings


Address: Plot No. 04, Sector -06, IMT Manesar
Gurugram,
Haryana -122050 (India)
Phone Number: -
Current Quality Certification(s): IATF 16949:2016 & ISO 9001:2015
Number of Coating Employees at this Facility: 190
Captive Coater (Y/N): N
Commercial Coater (Y/N): Y
Date of Assessment: 24/06/2023
10.03.2022 -11.03.2022 (Self Assessment by
Date of Previous Assessment: Supplier)
Date of Re-assessment (if necessary): -
Type(s) of Coating Processing at this Facility:
Process Table A: Applicable Process Table G: Applicable
Pre-treatment (Aqueous) Dip Spin and Zinc Flake
Process Table B: Applicable Process Table H:
Pre-treatment (Mechanical) Autodeposition
Process Table C: Process Table I: Applicable
Conversion Coatings Cure
Process Table D: Process Table J:
Powder Coating Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing
Process Table E: Applicable Process Table K: Applicable
Spray Coating Equipment
Process Table F:
Electrocoat
Personnel Contacted:
Name: Phone

Auditors / Assessors:
Name: Phone
Mr. Akash Upadhyay 8400258501
Mr. Sumit Dhariwal 9306206855

Number of Nonconforming Findings from Section 1 and Section 2: 0


Number of Nonconforming Findings in the Job Audit(s): 0 0

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Number of Nonconforming Findings in the Process Table(s): 0

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

CSA SECTION 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning

Management Responsibility and Quality Planning

1.1 There shall be a dedicated and qualified surface finishing person on site.

• To ensure readily available expertise, there shall be a dedicated and qualified surface finishing person on site.
• This individual shall be a full-time employee and the position shall be reflected in the organization chart.
• A job description shall exist identifying the qualifications for the position including coating and surface finishing knowledge.
• The qualifications shall include a minimum of 5 years’ experience in surface finishing operation or a combination of a minimum of 5 years of relevant formal
education and surface finishing experience.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
What is this person’s title? Quality Head - Mr. Saurabh Kumar Conforming
Yes, Annexure 1 of Quality Manual, Rev. 0,
Is this position reflected in the organizational chart? 15.11.2018 last updated on Date 02.01.2023 Conforming

Is there a documented job description listing all the required qualifications and Available amd evident with format no. F01 (MR-P-
responsibilities of this position? 14, Rev.0 last updated on 02.02.2023) Conforming

B.Tech Mech with 10 years experience in Geomet


Describe in detail this person’s educational background and practical experience. Conforming
coating application

How many years of process experience at a coating facility does this person have? 10 Years Conforming
Is this individual a full-time employee at the location being audited? Full time employed Conforming
Comments: Ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.2 The facility shall perform advanced quality planning.

• The organization shall incorporate a documented advanced product quality planning process.
• A feasibility study shall be performed and internally approved for each new part or process. Similar parts can be grouped into part families for this effort as
defined by the organization.
• After the part approval process is approved by the customer, no process changes are allowed unless approved by the customer.
• The organization shall contact the customer when clarification of process changes is required. This clarification of process changes shall be documented.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Yes, procedure for APQP QAD-D-09 is available and


Does the facility use a documented advanced quality planning process? evident with latest Rev.04, & Date 10.10.2022 Conforming

Does the facility perform a documented internal feasibility study for each part before
Yes Feasibility study report F03(QAD-P-09) Rev. no.
processing?
01, Dated 26.02.2021 was evident for part Ball pin Conforming
If no, does the facility perform a documented internal feasibility study for similar part types
threaded M10x1.5. done on Date 14.01.2023
or family of parts before processing?

What is the procedure for changing the process after PPAP? ECN conforming
Comments: OK

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.3 The facilities FMEAs shall be up to date and shall reflect the current process.

• The organization shall incorporate the use of a documented Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and ensure the FMEAs are updated to reflect current
part quality status.
• The FMEA shall be written for each part or part family or they may be process-specific and written for each process.
• FMEAs shall address every process step from part receipt to part shipment.
• A cross-functional team shall be used in the development of the FMEA.
• All special characteristics, as defined by the organization and its customers, shall be identified, defined, and addressed in the FMEA.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Production - Abhay Singh


Yes, F06 (QAD-P-09) Common PFMEA was evident
Does the facility have a documented Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in use? Quality - Saurabh
last revised Kumar with rev. no.17 for double
on 01.05.2023 Conforming
QMS-
dippingYogesh
process.
Incoming Inspection - Neeraj Kumar
Final Inspection - Anil Mishra
Laboratory - Swati Verma
Identify the names and job function of the team members used in the development of the
Maintenance - Rakesh Kumar Conforming
FMEA.
Degreasing - Sudhir Kumar
Shot Blasting - Avenendra
Coating - Nitin, Satyam
Identify if the FMEA is written for each part, part family or process specific. Evidental
Packing and FMEA was Process
Dispatch - Mohitspecific
Verma for all parts. Conforming
Operations - Subhasis Datta
Yes, F06 (QAD-P-09) Common PFMEA was evident,
Are all FMEAs consistent with all associated documentation such as control plans, work
in control plan process steps was same according to Conforming
instructions and shop travelers?
FMEA and PFD.

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Yes, F06 (QAD-P-09) Common PFMEA was evident,


Do all FMEAs include every process step from part receipt to part shipment? in control plan process steps was same according to Conforming
FMEA and PFD.

FMEA F06 (QAD-P-09) verify for special


Are special characteristics, as defined by the organization and its customers, identified,
characteristics , Part coating weight was show Conforming
defined, and addressed in the FMEAs?
critical in FMEA and control plan.

Yes, F06 (QAD-P-09) FMEA was revised for double


Provide evidence that the FMEA has been updated in response to quality issues. dipping process regarding customer complaint rec. Conforming
from customer.

Comments: -

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.4 The process control plans shall be up to date and shall reflect the current process.

• The organization shall incorporate the use of a documented control plan and ensure the control plans are updated to reflect current controls.
• The control plans shall be written for each part or part family or they may be process-specific.
• The control plans shall address all process steps from part receipt to part shipment and identify all equipment used and all key surface finishing process
parameters as defined by the organization.
• A cross-functional team shall be used in the development of control plans, which shall be consistent with all associated documentation such as work
instructions, shop travelers, and FMEAs.
• All special characteristics, as defined by the organization and its customers, shall be identified, defined, and addressed in the control plans.
• The control plan shall detail the product and process characteristics, and controls including testing frequency and sample size.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Yes, Common Control plan, F01(QAD-P-09) Rev.15,


Does the facility have a documented control plan in use? Conforming
15/06/2023 was evident.

Identify if the control plan is written for each part, part family or process specific. Process specific - Common Conforming

Do all control plans include every process step from part receipt to part shipment? Yes Conforming

Does the control plan identify all key surface finishing process parameters? Yes, Conforming

Production - Abhay Singh


Quality - Saurabh Kumar
QMS- Yogesh
Incoming Inspection - Neeraj Kumar
Final Inspection - Anil Mishra
Laboratory - Swati Verma
Identify the names and job function of the team members used in the development of the
Maintenance - Rakesh Kumar Conforming
control plan.
Degreasing - Sudhir Kumar
Shot Blasting - Avenendra
Coating - Nitin, Satyam
Packing and Dispatch - Mohit Verma
Operations - Subhasis Datta

Are the control plans consistent with all associated documentation such as work
instructions, shop travelers, specifications and FMEAs? Yes Conforming

Provide evidence that sample sizes and frequencies for evaluation of process and product
Yes, addressed in control plan. Conforming
characteristics are addressed and consistent with the minimum requirements.

Are special characteristics, as defined by the organization and its customers, identified, Yes, Coating weight is defined as a special
defined, and addressed in the control plans? characteristics. Conforming

Provide evidence that the control plan has been updated in response to quality issues,
Yes Conforming
customer requirements and process changes.
Comments: Ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


All surface finishing related and referenced specifications shall be up to date and available. For example: SAE, AIAG, ASTM, General Motors, Ford, FCA, Toyota,
1.5 Volvo Truck.

• A document control system is pertinent for the handling and internal distribution of received customer specifications and to keep up to date with national or
global standards related to surface finishing processes. To ensure all customer requirements are understood and satisfied, the organization shall have all related
surface finishing and customer referenced standards and specifications available for use and a process to ensure that they are current.
• The organization shall have a process to ensure the timely review, distribution, and implementation of all customer and industry engineering standards and
specifications and changes based on customer required schedule. This process shall be executed as soon as possible and shall not exceed two weeks.
• The organization shall document this process of review and implementation, and it shall address how customer and industry documents are obtained, how
they are maintained within the organization, how the current status is established, and how the relevant information is cascaded to the shop floor within the
two week period.
• The organization shall identify who is responsible for performing these tasks.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Yes, Customer standard and specification are


Does the organization have all related surface finishing and customer referenced standards
available. Conforming
and specifications available for use?

Customers are providing the standards &


How are standards and specifications obtained? Conforming
specifications

Describe the system and timing used to maintain the standards and specifications to ensure Control of Document procedureMR-P-01 was
that they are up to date. evident for Yearly standard review system Confirming

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

New standard & specification are being received by


Marketing dept . Marketing dept is sharing these
Define that process used to review and communicate within the two week period updated
with Quality Head & QMS Head. QMS Head is
standards and specifications throughout the organization. Include the names and job Confirming
updating the same and communicating to concerned
functions of the responsible personnel.
dept.

Comments: ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.6 There shall be documented process instructions.

• The organization shall have written process instructions for all active parts or family of parts, including relevant part specific requirements. Examples of part
specific requirements include process line, coating type, load size, rectifier settings.
• These process instructions may take the form of work instructions, job card, computer-based recipes, or other similar documents.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Does the organization have written process instructions for all active parts or family of parts Available in tracking card. - Part specific Tracking
Conforming
and include all relevant operating parameters? card with Process parameters - F01(QAD-P-05)

What form of process specification is used? (These may be in the form of work instructions, Work Instructions, Tracking card/Job Card,
job card, computer-based recipes, or other similar documents.) Computer based recipes, Conforming
Comments:Ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.7 A valid product capability study shall be performed.

To demonstrate each process is capable of yielding acceptable product, the organization shall perform product capability studies for the initial validation of each
process, after relocation of any process equipment, and after a major change of any process or equipment. The organization shall define what constitutes a
major change.
• Initial product capability studies shall be conducted for all surface finishing processes per line as defined in scope of work and in accordance with customer
requirements. Capability study techniques shall be appropriate for the surface finishing product characteristics, (e.g., surface finishing thickness, corrosion
resistance, etc.).
• An action plan shall exist to address the steps to be followed in case capability indices fall outside customer requirements or established ranges.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Has an initial product capability study been performed? Yes, validation is done for all process Conforming

Are studies conducted for each surface finishing process for each line in the facility? Yes, product performance in checked for all lines. Conforming

Has a new study been completed after relocation of any process equipment, major rebuild Yes, validation is being done after re-location or
Conforming
of any equipment, or any significant change in process chemistry? modification.

Change is happened in process or machines. All are


How does the organization define what constitutes a major change? Conforming
addressed in 4 M change.

Analysis and corrective action and effectiveness


What steps are followed when capability indices fall outside specified requirements? checking Conforming

Comments:Ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.8 The organization shall collect, analyze, and react to product and process data over time.

• The analysis of product characteristics and processes parameters over time can yield vital information for defect prevention efforts.
• Methods of analysis shall include ongoing trend or historical data analysis of special product and process parameters.
• The organization shall determine which parameters to include in such analysis.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

What product characteristics and process parameters are used? All control plan parameters are recorded. Confirming

How is the ongoing trend or historical data reviewed and analyzed? daily and weekly review done Confirming

How does the organization use this data to prevent future failures and improve the quality
Implementation of CAPA Confirming
system?
Comments: ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.9 All process control and testing records must be retained for a minimum of one calendar year after the year in which they were created.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Records are retained as defined. Minimum 3 years -


What is the process to retain these records? Master list of Record Retention is defined(F05(MR- Conforming
P-01))

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

What is the process for retention of customer specific documents with longer retention
times? Maintained Hard & Soft copies Conforming
Comments: OK

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.10 There shall be a process in place to review the monitoring systems / logs at specified intervals.

• Management or management designee shall review the monitoring systems / logs at specified intervals.
• The organization shall have reaction plans for nonconformances to process requirements.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
MIS - Controlled through HMI - logs are being
Define the process in place to gather and review this information. maintained Conforming

Identify the manager or management designee reviewing the process records from the
monitoring systems / logs. Departmental head is reviewing the process records Conforming

Describe reaction plans for nonconformances to the written process requirements. Reaction plan mentioned in control plan Conforming
Comments: ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.11 Internal assessments shall be completed at a minimum once every 12 months using the latest revision of the CQI-12 coating System Assessment.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

This is the first internal self assessment done on


What is the date of the last AIAG CQI-12 coating System Assessment? 10.03.2022 -11.03.2022 and customer assessment is Conforming
done on 24.06.2023
Comments: ok

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.12 There shall be an internal system in place to authorize reprocessing and it shall be documented.

• The quality management system shall include a documented process for reprocessing that shall include authorization from the quality manager or a
designated individual.
• The reprocessing procedure shall describe product characteristics for which reprocessing is allowed as well as those characteristics for which reprocessing is
not permissible.
• All reprocessing activity shall require a separate rework specific process control sheet or other identification method, issued by qualified technical personnel
denoting the necessary surface finishing modifications.
• Records shall clearly indicate when and how any material has been reprocessed.
• The rework of material shall comply with the customer’s specifications and / or requirements.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Describe the procedure for authorizing reprocessing of nonconforming material. QAD-P-07, rev. 00, 15.11.2018 (rework procedure) Conforming

Does the reprocessing procedure describe product characteristics that allow or not allow Rework criteria defined in procedure ( QAD-P-11)
Conforming
reprocessing? Rv.02 date:-21.07.2021

Did the quality manager or manager’s designee authorize the rework and determine the Yes - Rework of Customer Returns are authorized by
Conforming
reprocessing procedure? Quality Head

Through rework material tracking card in pink


How do you identify that material has been reprocessed? colour. Conforming

Do the records clearly indicate when and how any material has been reprocessed including Verify tracking card of rework material, all the
the quality manager’s authorization of release? information was evident for same. Conforming

Provide evidence that the rework complies with your customer's specifications and / or After rework, parts are being checked against
requirements. inspection standard based on customer specification Conforming

Comments: Ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.13 The Quality Department shall review, address, and document customer and internal concerns.
The quality management system shall include a process for documenting, reviewing, and addressing customer concerns and any other concerns internal to the
organization.
Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Yes procedure available


Describe the procedure for reviewing and addressing external customer and internal Procedure for NC Products control QAD-P-07
concerns. Procedure of Customer Complaints QAD-P-12, Rev. Conforming
02,29.01.2022.

Describe the problem solving approach that is used. Fish Bone Diagram, Why Why analysis followed Conforming

Describe the communication process used to respond to the originator. Using Mail, Text messages, etc.. Conforming

Replying to Cosmo India - Black Spot in hole area


Provide a recent example of this procedure in use. Issue Conforming

Comments: Ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.14 The organization shall have a continual improvement process.

• The continual improvement process shall be designed to achieve improvements in quality and productivity.
• Identified actions shall be prioritized and shall include timing (estimated completion dates).
• The organization shall show evidence of program effectiveness.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Describe the continual improvement process used to achieve improvements in quality and Suggestion and Kaizen - Continual improvement
productivity. projects are taken Conforming

Provide a recent example of how actions are identified, prioritized and completion dates Suggestions are reviewed identified for
Conforming
assigned. implementation.
Describe how the organization measures the effectiveness. Reduction of rework%, productivity increased Conforming
Comments: Ok

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.15 There shall be predefined personnel responsible for management of materials in quarantine area.

Only the quality manager or designee may authorize the disposition of material from quarantine status.
Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Control of Non-conforming products procedure


Define the process for release of material from quarantine. Conforming
followed.
List the authorized personnel with job titles. Quality Head Conforming
Decision given by quality head with in 24 hours
Review evidence that only these persons are releasing materials from the quarantine area. Conforming
according to procdure (QAD-P-07).
Comments: OK

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.16 There shall be documented procedures and / or work instructions for all processes and they shall be available to all of the organization’s personnel.
• There shall be procedures or work instructions available to personnel covering their responsibilities.
• These documents shall include instructions for addressing potential emergencies (such as power failure), equipment start-up, equipment shut-down, product
segregation (See 2.3, 2.8), product inspection, and general operating procedures.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Work instruction available for process startup.


Review the procedure / work instruction for process start-up and shut-down. Conforming
F32(PRD- P-01)

Review the procedure / work instruction for process control during operation. Guidelines available for control the process. Conforming
Work InstructionWI 01(QAD-P-10) was evident for
What is the procedure in place to address potential emergencies?
handling of Abnormal Situations and abnormalities is Conforming
(Such as power outage and / or equipment failure).
handling according to work instruction
Review the procedures for inspection of the product, in process or after completion. Inspection plan followed Conforming
Verify that these procedures / work instructions are accessible to personnel performing the
Available in respective areas Conforming
job at all times.
Comments: OK

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.17 The organization and management shall provide employee training.

• The organization shall provide employee training for all operations.


• All employees, including backup and temporary employees, shall be trained.
• Documented evidence shall be maintained showing the employees trained and the evidence shall include an employee assessment.
• Management shall define the qualification requirements for each function, and ongoing or follow-up training shall also be addressed.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Review the process for initial training of all employees, including backup and temporary. Training procedure followed Conforming

Review the process for ongoing and / or follow-up training. Training plan followed Conforming

Provide a recent copy of the training matrix. Trainings records available Conforming
Provide documented evidence that shows how the organization verifies effectiveness of
training. Training effectiveness monitoring sheet Conforming
Comments: OK

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning

1.18
Essential management and supervisory functions shall be performed by qualified personnel at all times and a matrix of these essential responsibilities shall be
available for review.

• The organization shall maintain a responsibility matrix identifying all essential management and supervisory functions and list the qualified personnel who
may perform such functions.
• It shall identify both primary and secondary (backup) personnel for the essential functions (as defined by the organization).
• This matrix shall be readily available to management at all times.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Review and provide an example of the most recent matrix. Departmental activity vs resp. defined Conforming

Confirm that the matrix includes both primary and secondary persons. Yes, Available - Conforming

Describe how and where this information is made available. All respective departments Conforming
Comments: Primary and Secondary Persons to be defined

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.19 There shall be a preventive maintenance program and maintenance data shall be utilized to form a predictive / preventive maintenance program.

• The organization shall have a documented preventive maintenance program for essential process equipment (as identified by the organization).
• The program shall be a closed-loop process that tracks maintenance efforts from request to completion to assessment of effectiveness.
• Equipment operators shall have the opportunity to report problems, and problems shall also be handled in a closed-loop manner.
• Company data, (e.g., downtime, quality rejects, first time-through capability, recurring maintenance work orders, and operator-reported problems) shall be
used to improve the preventive maintenance program.
• Maintenance data shall be collected and analyzed as part of a preventive maintenance program.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Show evidence that a documented preventive maintenance program exists. Preventive maintenance plan followed Conforming
Describe the process for reporting problems. Maintenance - problem register implemented Conforming

Verify B/D maint slip, B/D was happened on


01.09.2022 on M/C no. 01 (Oven), due to Convayor
Provide a recent example showing that the person reporting the problem received
sprocket key broken, after close the B/D, Maint. Conforming
feedback after the problem was resolved.
Deptt. Handover the oven to the production after
belt speed verification.

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Give a recent example of how the program was used to prevent / predict potential Poka yoke verification, Daily machine checksheet
Conforming
equipment failure. F19(MNT-P-02)
How is the data being generated reviewed with management to improve the quality Major breakdown analysis and implementation of
system? action plan. Conforming

Comments: OK

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning


1.20 The organization shall develop a critical spare part list and the parts must be available to minimize production disruptions.

• Spare part suppliers, minimum quantity and lead times shall be documented.
Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Provide the critical spare parts list. Available, Conforming
Yes, verify WI 06 (MNT-P-02) for spare managemnt
Does the critical spare parts list include inventory, lead time and suppliers? all criteria was defined for same. Conforming

Describe how and when the organization updates the list. On Every 15 Days by physical inventory verification Conforming

What criteria is used to determine whether critical spare parts are kept at the facility or
based on lead time and availability. Conforming
sourced off site.
Describe the process used to maintain minimum quantities. based on the consumption & interchange part Conforming
Comments: ok

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

CSA SECTION 2 : Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility
2.1 The organization shall ensure that customer data entered into the receiving system matches the customer’s shipping documents.

It is critical that all customer requirements and lot identification be correctly transferred to internal documents.
• The facility shall ensure that the data entered in the receiving system match the information on the customer's shipping documents.
• Documented processes and evidence of compliance shall exist (e.g., shop travelers, work orders)
• Sometimes the material received does not precisely correspond to customer shipping documents. The facility shall have a detailed procedure in place to resolve
receiving discrepancies.
• The requirements stated above apply to captive, in-house, commercial and all involved departments.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Incoming Material register F02(QAD-P-01)


Describe the receiving process including listing the documentation used. Conforming
Incoming inspection Report F01(QAD-P-01)

Describe the process to identify the coating requirements. Customer PO, Challan, Internal Part No. , Tracking Card Conforming

Describe the reaction process when material received does not correspond to the
Inform to customer, if any mismatch. Conforming
customer’s documents.
Comments: Ok

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


2.2 Is product clearly identified and stored throughout the surface finishing process and is lot traceability and integrity maintained?

Procedures are required for part and container identification to avoid incorrect processing or mixing of lots.
• As received, in-process, and finished product or material shall be properly segregated, identified, and stored in a dedicated and clearly defined area.
• Out-going lot(s) shall be traceable to the incoming lot(s).
• The discipline of precisely identifying lots and linking all pertinent information to them enhances the ability to do root cause analysis and continual improvement.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Describe the method that ensures the parts and lot numbers are correctly identified and
Every Trolley contains tracking card F01(QAD-P-05) Conforming
maintained throughout the process.

Verify that received, in-process, and finished product or material is properly segregated, Different trolleys colour & size are used in different
Conforming
identified, and stored in a dedicated and clearly defined area. processes
Comments: Ok

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


2.3 Procedures shall be adequate to prevent movement of nonconforming product into and out of the production system.

The control of suspect or nonconforming product is necessary to prevent inadvertent shipment or contamination of other lots.
• Procedures shall be adequate to prevent movement of nonconforming product into the production system.
• Procedures shall exist addressing authorized personnel, appropriate disposition, product identification and tracking of material flow in and out of hold area.
• Nonconforming hold area shall be clearly designated to ensure segregation of such material.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Holding area is placed inside of the plant with lock and
Where is the nonconforming holding area, and how is it identified? Conforming
key system and identified with display board.
Quality Head is authorised for movement of non-
Describe the procedure to prevent the unauthorized movement of nonconforming products. Conforming
confirming product.
Hold material list is displayed in holding area with in
Provide evidence that material movement in and out of this area is documented. Conforming
and out status.
Comments: Ok

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility

2.4 For bulk processing there shall be a procedure to identify trap points throughout the entire process to reduce risk of unfinished, improperly coated and mixed parts.

• The organization shall have documented procedures to identify and monitor all trap points for each process / equipment.
• Monitoring of potential trap points shall occur at minimum every part changeover.
• Trap points may include: Baskets, barrels, bins, part containers, loading and unloading equipment, oven belts, load hoppers and transfer belts.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Describe the procedure to identify and monitor all trap points for each process and / or Trap points is identified visually, where part is trapped.
Conforming
equipment. Trap point is monitored daily shift.

Provide the list of trap points. Trap point list is available Conforming

Comments: ok

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


2.5 The handling, storage and packaging shall be adequate to ensure product quality is maintained throughout the entire process.

• Handling, storage, and packaging shall be adequate to ensure product quality.


• Part cleanliness shall be maintained throughout the process.
• All parts shall be stored in a controlled environment.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Which process steps have dedicated in-process containers? Degreasing, shot blasting and coating Conforming

How are containers maintained to preserve part cleanliness? Covered container is used is after shot blasting process. Confirming

Describe how the containers are inspected to ensure they are free of foreign material. Before using container, it is cleaned. Confirming

What is used for liner material of customer containers before packing finished goods for
shipment? Polythene sheet is being used Confirming
(Materials like newspapers, used cardboard and bags should be avoided).

Provide a list of dedicated storage areas that avoid exposure to contamination and
FG Storage area is located away from the shot blasting
corrosion. (Storage outdoors, near media blasting and corrosive processes such as acid Confirming
shop and it is under the factory shed.
tanks should be avoided).
Comments: Ok

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


2.6 Each process step shall be documented and traceable.
How does the operator verify that all process steps have been completed in specified order and in within specified time limits?
Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

Do you have a document (e.g., shop travelers, job sheet, etc.) that specifies all the processes
Tracking card F01(QAD-P-05) Conforming
for each part number / part family?
Define the procedure that ensures that all processes have been completed in the specified All process steps are defined in the material tracking
Conforming
order. card.
Describe how time sensitive processes are completed in the specified time limits (e.g., wet
NA NA
part transfer).
Provide documentation that this process has been followed. NA NA
Comments: Ok

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


2.7 Part loading shall be specified, documented and controlled.
• Loading parameters shall be specified, documented and controlled.
• Examples include: parts per rack, part position and orientation, weight per barrel / basket or masking.
Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Describe how the loading parameters are communicated to the operator. Tracking Card/ Loading Guidelines Conforming
Identify how the loading weight or rack quantity is recorded for each load or rack. Data is entered in log book in each process Conforming
Comments: Ok

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


2.8 There shall be a procedure for material handling, containment action and product segregation in the event of an unplanned process interruption.

Unplanned downtime greatly increases the risk of improper processing.


• Work instructions specifically addressing potential types of unplanned process interruptions shall be accessible to operators.
• Specific instructions shall address containment / reaction plans for each step of the process. Where processes are time critical, immediate actions are required.
Examples include process steps exposing parts to: acidic solutions, current, bake or curing processes.
• Evidence shall exist showing disposition and traceability of affected product.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
4M Change Management, Procedure QAD-P-08,
What procedure is used to address each step of the process? Conforming
Rev.03 , 15/02/2023
Provide all work instructions that address unplanned process interruptions. Process wise Guidelines available for unplanned process Conforming
How is the affected product traced, dispositioned and documented? 4M Lot number Conforming
Comments: Ok

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


2.9 Plant cleanliness, environment, and working conditions shall be conducive to ensure product quality.
• Plant cleanliness, housekeeping, environmental, and working conditions shall be adequate to preserve product quality.
• A housekeeping policy shall be clearly defined and executed.
Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA
Provide a copy of the housekeeping procedure.
Provide a copy of the procedure used to handle dropped or spilled parts. Process for non-confirming and suspected products Conforming

Describe what is done with loose parts found on the floor of the plant. Process for non-confirming and suspected products Conforming

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Define the process used to review the facility for conditions that are detrimental to quality
5S Audit Checksheet Conforming
processing such as chemical spills and inadequate ventilation.
Comments: Ok
Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility
2.10 Plant lighting shall be adequate in all inspection areas.

Lighting in the part and / or process inspection areas must be adequate for the intended operation.

Conforming
Guidance Objective Evidence Nonconforming
NA

How do you ensure the lighting in the part and / or process inspection areas, including
Monitoring of Lux level Conforming
loading and unloading areas, is adequate for the intended operation?
For part inspection, how do you arrange the lighting to avoid spot lighting, glare, shadows
Light with refractor installed in inspection table Conforming
and distracting reflections?
Comments: ok

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

CSA SECTION 4 - JOB AUDIT

Section 4 - Coating System Assessment Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:

Customer: OCAP Chassis Parts Pvt Ltd

Shop Order Number:

Part Number: 2171691/020

Part Description: Balll Pin Threaded ( M12*1.5)

Material Substrate:

Plating Requirements: Geomet 720

Specification Number and Revision:


Identify Relevant Documents and Actual Conforming
Question
Inspection Element Condition (Provide Data or Values and Embed or Nonconforming
Number
Attach Documents) NA

Attach evidence that the documentation for the


specific part conforms to the requirements including:
4.1 • Advanced quality planning process Available Conforming
• FMEA
• Process Control Plan

What customer specifications or requirements are


4.2 used for this part? Customer requirement is evident. Conforming
• List the specification(s) and revision(s)

4.3 Provide evidence of receiving inspection. Incoming inspection Report found OK Conforming

Provide the job traveler or attach a copy of this • Customer name -


traveler showing: • Lot number -
• Customer name • Weight / quantity -
4.4 • Lot number • Process instructions - Available Backside of the Conforming
• Weight / quantity tracking card
• Process instructions • Inspection requirements - Available Backside of
• Inspection requirements the tracking Card.

If the lot is divided how is the traceability maintained


4.5 throughout the process? Material Lot No. M230309-08 Conforming

Describe the method used to document each


operation as being completed. Is there a sign-off with
4.6 Bar code and scan in each process. Conforming
time stamp, bar code or scan, etc., after each
operation?

Attach work instructions applicable to this part


Basket is identified based on the coating
indicating proper barrel / basket mesh size or
chemical.
4.7 perforation (hole size), load size, appropriate rack Conforming
Basket size mentioned Master list of Jigs and
configuration, appropriate part orientation on rack,
fixture .
etc.

Identify each process table pertaining to this job


audit. Populate the applicable process tables with
4.8 the actual process results / conditions at the time table A Conforming
this part was processed (Columns H and I in Process
Tables A through H).

Were appropriate process steps on the job


Operator manaul sign off the tracking card after
4.9 router / traveler signed off? For electronic systems, a Conforming
completion of process.
screen print is acceptable.

Were all inspection steps, as documented in the


4.10 Yes, this is available In control plan Conforming
control plan performed?
Were steps / operations performed that were not All Operations involve in coating process are
4.11 documented in the control plan? mentioned in control plan. Conforming

If additional steps were performed, were they


4.12 authorized? Through deviation Authorization Conforming

If the order was certified, did the certification


4.13 Tracking Card Conforming
accurately reflect the process performed?

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Was the certification signed by an authorized


4.14 individual? Yes, Conforming

Are the parts and containers free of foreign objects


4.15 Yes, Conforming
or contamination?
4.16 Are packaging requirements identified? Packaging requirements are idenfied Conforming

Are parts packaged to prevent mixing or damage to Material packed seprately in polybag /Wooden
4.17 Conforming
parts (parts packed over height of container)? container

Are storage condition sufficient to maintain part


4.18 quality. (e.g., parts are stored indoors in a clean, dry Material are stored in covered shed, dry place Conforming
environment).

Were the parts properly identified and / or labeled


4.19 Yes, Material tag is being used Conforming
before shipping?

Each part may have one or more requirements determined by the


For the finished part, list each test and inspection
4.20 coating specification. Parts must meet each requirement. Add
requirement per customer specification.
additional sections as needed.

Conforming
Below is an example of how to fill out sections in
Inspection Requirements Nonconforming
4.20.x
NA

Test Description: Corrosion Resistance Conforming

Test Method: ISO 9227 Conforming

Example Test frequency or quantity: As per plan Conforming


only
Test Requirement: 720 hrs. no red rust. Conforming

Result:
Attach evidence: - Conforming

Insert audit data below this line. Add additional sections as needed

Test Description: Corrosion Resistance Conforming

Test Method: ISO 9227 Conforming

4.20.1 Test frequency or quantity: As per plan Conforming

Test Requirement: 720 Hours - No Red Rust Conforming

Result:
Attach evidence: Not Done Conforming

Test Description: Coating thickness Conforming

Test Method: XRF Conforming

4.20.2 Test frequency or quantity: Every Lot Conforming

Test Requirement: > 5 micron Conforming

Result:
Attach evidence: 7-15micron Conforming

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to applicnler customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor

If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies
must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column
Instruction for creating the table with the form builder:

Using the Populate Forms lists to the right, select the box that represents the first step of the process flow
Then select the Populate Forms banner and that section of the process table will be added below
For each additional step of the process flow, continue adding sections to the form by selecting the applicable step from the list to the right, followed by selecting the Populate Forms banner.
Fitness between process steps are to be included.
If using multiple counter flowed rinses only insert one Rinse section, document only the condition of the last rinse tank in the series.

Process Line Identification


Type of Line : Rack or Barrel

Observations /
Category / Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Job Audit Measurement
Comments
Actual
Conforming
Minimum Actual Actual Measurements
Item # Monitoring Requirement Nonconforming Range
Requirement Condition Condition supporting time
NA
of Job Audit

1.0 Aqueous Cleaning Process (Alkaline or Acid)

There shall be an incoming part assessment procedure with


A1.1 Per Control Plan Yes Once per lot and per part change Every lot Conforming - -
criteria

Automatic Line : Confirm set-up at the


start of production and every process
change. Manually verify every 3
months or after programming change
A1.2 Time Automatic / Manual Automatic PLC Controlled Conforming PLC Controlled PLC Controlled
of equipment maintenance.

Manual Line : Continuously monitor


time in each stage of process

2.0 Cleaning / Descaling Solution

Pressure for spray rinse.


A2.1 Automatic / Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA NA NA NA
Agitation for immersion tanks
Solution Temperature is monitored and controlled if required Continuous monitoring by controller.
A2.2 Automatic Automatic Every lot Conforming 60 - 80 Deg. C 71 Deg. C
by chemical supplier's technical data sheet Manually verify daily

Automatic Max. SAT Every lot


Continuous monitoring by controller.
A2.3 Temperature (Thermocouple) difference allowed ± Automatic recorded in Conforming 60 - 80 Deg. C 71 Deg. C
Manually verify daily
5ºC (10ºF) HMI

Chemical Concentration (Alkaline Cleaner) (if used)


Per chemical supplier recommendation such as:
PH - <9
- free alkalinity PH - 8.0
Every Shift Concentration
A2.4 - total alkalinity Automatic / Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Conforming Concentration -
(8Hours) - 80 - 110
- pH 101.05 gm/Ltr.
Gram/Ltr.
- conductivity
- percentage of cleaner (weight/volume or volume/volume)

Chemical Concentration (Acid Cleaner) (if used) Per chemical


supplier recommendation such as
A2.5 Automatic / Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA NA NA NA
- free acidity or concentration
- metal contamination

Impurity Content
Per chemical supplier recommendation such as
A2.6 - acid spit (oil contamination) Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA NA NA NA
- alkalinity ratio
- iron content

Level Sensor
Indicator and
A2.7 Solution Level Manual Automatic Once every 8 hours Conforming NA NA
automatic
topup

Solution and tank clean out schedule is documented and As per Cleaning
A2.8 followed Manual Manual Per preventive maintenance program and Maint. Conforming NA NA
- Desludging, coalesce, new make-up frequency, etc. Plan

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the audit shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row.
For sections that are not applicable mark NA in the Comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Process Line Identification

Type of Line : Rack or Barrel

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)


Observations /
Category / Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Job Audit Measurement
Comments
Actual
Conforming
Minimum Actual Actual Measurements
Item # Monitoring Requirement Nonconforming Range
Requirement Condition Condition supporting time
NA
of Job Audit

3.0 Rinse
Rinse Type - Identify in comment section e.g., Flowing, Automatic
A3.1 Automatic Once every 8 hours done Confirming Continuous Continuous
Counter flowing, Spray, Stagnant, Drag-in / out Flowing
Water Type - Identify in comment section e.g., Municipal.
A3.2 NA NA Municipal.
Deionized (Dl) Reverse Osmosis (RO)
Agitation Type - Identify in comment section, if applicable,
A3.3 Automatic NA Air
e.g., Mechanical (Describe) Air, Ultrasonic.
Solution Temperature is monitored and controlled if required Continuous monitoring by controller.
A3.4 Automatic NA NA NA
by chemical supplier's technical data sheet Manually verify daily
Automatic Max. SAT
Continuous monitoring by controller.
A3.5 Temperature (Thermocouple), if applicable difference allowed ± NA NA Na
Manually verify daily
5ºC (10ºF)

A3.6 pH, if applicable Manual Manual Once every 8 hours * done Confirming
A3.7 Conductivity, if applicable Manual NA Once every 8 hours * NA
A3.8 Concentration, if applicable Manual NA Once every 8 hours * NA
A3.9 Flow rate, if applicable Manual NA Once every 8 hours * NA
A3.10 Spray nozzle condition, if applicable Manual NA Once every 8 hours * NA
Verify position of incoming water feed is near the bottom (if
A3.11 Manual Manual Per preventive maintenance program done Confirming
immersion tank)
A3.12 Tank maintenance schedule documented and followed Manual Yes Per preventive maintenance program P.M Confirming
4.0 Acid / Neutral Picking
A4.1 Concentration Manual NA Once every 8 hours * NA
A4.2 Concentration of Fe, per chemical supplier Manual NA Once per day NA
Solution Temperature is monitored and controlled if required Continuous monitoring by controller.
A4.3 Automatic NA NA
by chemical supplier's technical data sheet Manually verify daily
Automatic Max. SAT
Continuous monitoring by controller.
A4.4 Temperature (Thermocouple), if applicable difference allowed ± NA NA
Manually verify daily
5ºC (10ºF)
A4.5 Inhibitor (if used) Manual NA Per supplier data sheet NA
A4.6 Solution Level Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA
Solution and tank clean out schedule is documented and
A4.7 followed Manual NA Per preventive maintenance program NA
- Desludging, coalesce, new make-up frequency, etc.
A4.8 Rinse - See Section 3.0 NA
PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the audit shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row.
For sections that are not applicable mark NA in the Comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

5.0 Aluminum Etching


A5.1 Concentration Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA
A5.2 Concentrations of Al. per chemical supplier Manual NA Once per day NA
Solution Temperature is monitored and controlled if required Continuous monitoring by controller.
A5.3 Automatic NA NA
by chemical supplier's technical data sheet Manually verify daily
Automatic Max. SAT
Continuous monitoring by controller.
A5.4 Temperature (Thermocouple), if applicable difference allowed ± NA NA
Manually verify daily
5ºC (10ºF)

Solution and tank clean out schedule is documented and


A5.5 followed Manual NA Per preventive maintenance program NA
- Desludging, coalesce, new make-up frequency, etc.
A5.6 Rinse - See Section 3.0 NA NA
6.0 Aluminum Deoxidizing
A6.1 Concentration Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA
A6.2 Concentrations of Al. per chemical supplier Manual NA Once per day NA
Solution Temperature is monitored and controlled if required Continuous monitoring by controller.
A6.3 Automatic NA NA
by chemical supplier's technical data sheet Manually verify daily
Automatic Max. SAT
Continuous monitoring by controller.
A6.4 Temperature (Thermocouple), if applicable difference allowed ± NA NA
Manually verify daily
5ºC (10ºF)
Solution and tank clean out schedule is documented and
A6.5 followed Manual NA Per preventive maintenance program NA
- Desludging, coalesce, new make-up frequency, etc.
A6.6 Rinse - See Section 3.0 NA NA
7.0 Sealing Rinse (if applicable)
Solution Temperature is monitored and controlled if required Continuous monitoring by controller.
A7.1 Automatic NA NA
by chemical supplier's technical data sheet Manually verify daily

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Automatic Max. SAT


Continuous monitoring by controller.
A7.2 Temperature (Thermocouple), if applicable difference allowed ± NA NA
Manually verify daily
5ºC (10ºF)
A7.3 Concentration Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA
A7.4 pH, if applicable Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA
A7.5 Solution Level Manual NA Once every 8 hours NA
Solution and tank clean out schedule is documented and
A7.6 followed Manual NA Per preventive maintenance program NA
- Dislodging, coalesce, new make-up frequency, etc.
A7.7 Rinse - See Section 3.0 NA NA
PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the audit shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row.
For sections that are not applicable mark NA in the Comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

8.0 Oil / Wax (if applicable)


A8.1 Pressure / Agitation Automatic NA Once every 8 hours NA

Chemical Analysis :
Per chemical supplier recommendation such as
if not used at 100% concentration,
- Concentration
A8.2 Manual NA every 8 hours. If used at 100% NA
- Emulsion Stability
concentration, every lot change.
- Viscosity
- Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Solution Temperature is monitored and controlled if required Continuous monitoring by controller.


A8.3 Automatic NA NA
by chemical supplier's technical data sheet Manually verify daily
Automatic Max. SAT
Continuous monitoring by controller.
A8.4 Temperature (Thermocouple), if applicable difference allowed ± NA NA
Manually verify daily
5ºC (10ºF)

Solution and tank clean out schedule is documented and


A8.5 followed Manual NA Per preventive maintenance program NA
- Desludging, coalesce, new make-up frequency, etc.
9.0 Dry-Off (if applicable)

A9.1 Air temperature is monitored and controlled Automatic Automatic Once every 8 hours Every Lot Conforming 120 - 160 Deg. 140 Deg. C

No zirblast
There is a procedure to ensure dryness of parts prior to Every change of lot number and each No zirblast
A9.2 Visual Visual Each Lot Conforming powder
subsequent coating container powder Sticked
Sticked

10.0 Process Equipment

Process equipment shall be verified and calibrated per Process Table K


Calibration shall be certified, posted and up to date
A10.1
A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
Complete the audit for these identified elements in Process Table K

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What internal system is used for conducting and managing calibration of all relevant equipment identified in
Calibration plan of Measuring Instruments Available Conforming
Process Table K?

Provide the document that lists all relevant equipment identified in Process Table K Master list of Measuring Instruments Available Conforming

How do you ensure calibrations are up to date ? Review Calibration plan V/s Actual Conforming

How do you ensure new equipment has been added to the calibration list and inactive equipment has been
Review of Calibration plan and master list in every month. Conforming
removed ?

Are calibration labels present and up to date for listed equipment ? Calibration stickers are available in Calibrated Instruments Conforming

Sent the faulty instrument to calibration lab to re-calibrate. Reaction plan


What is the reaction plan to any failed verification ? Conforming
is defined

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the audit shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row.
For sections that are not applicable mark NA in the Comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

A10.2 Barrels, baskets, process tanks, belts / conveyors, racks, fixtures and drive mechanisms shall be maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you inspect for the integrity of the barrels, baskets, process tanks, racks, contact points, belts /
conveyors and drive mechanism? Check Daily as per Daily Machine check sheet.
Conforming
(e.g., wear, perforations, trap points, plugged holes, door gaps, other damage) As per PM check sheet on schedule.
Where are the inspection results documented ?

What is your preventive maintenance program for barrels, baskets, racks, contact points, process tanks and Preventive Maintenance plan available for production machine &
Conforming
drive mechanism ? Supporting Equipments.

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

What is the maintenance program for mechanical / chemical cleaning of barrels, baskets, racks, contact points
Basket/Tray/Tank/trolley Cleaning is done as per decided frequency. Conforming
and process tanks ?

How is each basket, barrel or rack uniquely identified for tracking purpose ? Not Applicable -

All filtration shall be maintained


A10.3
The organization shall have a preventive maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is the preventive maintenance program for filters ? NA

How is the filter type identified during use ? NA

If reusable filters are used, do they meet the supplier's recommendations ? NA

If disposable filters are used, do they meet the supplier's recommendations ? NA

What are your criteria for filter replacement and / or cleaning ? NA

What information is used to determine the required mesh size ? NA

How is compatibility with the process determined ? NA

Describe the preventive maintenance program for all solution filters to include plate, filter bag and cartridge NA

Describe the preventive maintenance program for all air filters used on ovens, dryers, chillers, blowers and
Preventive Maintenance plan available for all Supporting Equipments. Conforming
fans etc.
All process and equipment alarms shall be used tested on a quarterly basis at a minimum
A10.4
The organization shall have a preventive maintenance system that is documented and implemented

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the audit shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row.
For sections that are not applicable mark NA in the Comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is the preventive maintenance program where alarms are used for solution temperature, level control,
All poka yoke verification is being done on shift wise Conforming
environmental control, faults, etc. ?

What are the alarms that are tested and their test frequency ? All poka yoke verification is being done on shift wise Conforming

A10.5 Processing equipment is designed / optimized for "soft handing" of parts

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Are chutes lined to prevent part damage ? Lined with Teflon sheet Conforming
Inclined Teflon sheet is used while collecting the material from the belt to
What technique(s) are used to minimize drop heights ? Conforming
trolley to provent part damage

A10.6 Part transfer equipment is maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is you program to assure cleanliness of belts, conveyors, chutes, vibratory tables, etc. ? Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming

What is your maintenance program for belts, conveyors, chutes, vibratory tables, etc. ? As per PM Plan. Include in Machine Preventive Maintenance Check sheet Conforming

A10.7 In-process and customer containers are managed and maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you identify and segregate in-process containers for different processes ? The design of trolley and handle colour is different Conforming
What is your maintenance program for keeping in-process containers clean and in good condition ? As per monthly plan, Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming
How to you ensure that the customer containers do not degrade the quality of the coated parts ? Before keeping the finished product in customer container, cleaning of
Conforming
(e.g., customer container may arrive damaged, oily, dirty) container is being done
Electrical system shall be maintained
A10.8
Coater shall have a preventive maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Describe the preventive maintenance program for rectifiers (e.g., voltage and amperage) NA

All anodes / cathodes, contacts and bussing shall be maintained.


NA
Coater shall have a preventive maintenance system that is document and implemented

Describe the preventive maintenance program including cleanliness, electrical resistance and electrical shorts. NA

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the audit shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row.
For sections that are not applicable mark NA in the Comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

11.0 Test Equipment (Process Control and Finished Part Quantity)

Test Equipment shall be verified and calibrated as per Process Table K


Calibrations shall be certified, posted and up to date.
A11.1
A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
Complete the audit for these identified elements in Process Table K

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Wet Analysis
Lab testing chemicals is use after verification of Expiry date or shelf life. Conforming
Before use, chemicals must be checked for shelf life and / or expiration date
Daily Verification of PH meter is being done with standard ph solution and
pH Meter Conforming
Calibration Annually by outside lab.
Daily Verification of PH meter is being done with ph solution and
pH Probes (must be solution compatible) Conforming
Calibration Annually
Laboratory Balance (Weight Scale) Not Applicable

Rectifier Not Applicable

Hand Held Thermometer Not Applicable

Temperature Controller Daily verification and Calibration Every Six months Conforming

Thermocouple calibration done Conforming

Solution Mixer Not Applicable


Amp Meter / Volt Meter Not Applicable

Filters Not Applicable

Conductivity Meter Not Applicable

Conductivity Probes (must be solution compatible) Not Applicable

Ultrasonic Cleaner, if applicable Not Applicable


Proceed to PT B, PT C or PT H

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

PROCESS TABLE B - Pretreatment (Mechanical)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Observations /
Category / Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Comments Job Audit Measurement

Actual
Conforming
Minimum Actual Measurements
Item # Monitoring Requirement Actual Condition Nonconforming Range
Requirement Condition supporting time
NA
of Job Audit

1.0 Abrasive Blast Process

For batch operations per load. For No oil and


No oil and grease
B1.2 Parts shall be clean and free of oil and grease Manual Manual integrated operations once every 8 Every Lot Conforming grease after
after degreasing
hours degreasing
Automatic in
B1.3 Load Weight is verified Manual / Automatic Degressing Per load Every Lot / Per Load Conforming

Supplier TC & Grade verification


B1.4 Media Size / type is appropriate for the part being processed Manual Manual Per part number during incoming inspection Conforming Supplier TC Supplier TC

B1.5 Dwell time is clearly defined Manual / Automatic Automatic Per load Per Load Conforming - -
Verify blazing force / energy is sent and maintained with
B1.6 control limits, e.g., Amperage Draw, PSI Manual / Automatic Automatic Per load Per Load Conforming - -

B1.7 Verify abrasive media volume is sufficient Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Per Load Conforming - -

As per acceptance
B1.8 Verify dust collector efficiency / air flow is within limits Manual Automatic Once every 8 hours Every Lot Conforming Dust Level
Criteria - OK

Media size / life


Continuous Sucking system
B1.9 Media size is being checked on a regular schedule to Manual / Automatic Automatic Once per week Conforming - -
working
determine effective cleaning and life for product mix

Part cleanliness is checked after process. Surface cleanliness


No black spots
B1.10 check must be conducted using a chemical e.g., copper Manual Manual Once every 4 hours Every Lot Conforming No black spots observed
sulfate, surface tension ink or other qualitative method

If additional blazing is required, management approval is


B1.11 needed Manual / Automatic Automatic Per load Every Lot / Per Load Conforming - -

B1.12 Surface profile is checked after process, if applicable Manual NA Per load NA

2.0 Process Equipment

Process equipment shall be verified and calibrated pler Process Table K


Calibrations shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
B2.1 A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment's
Complete the audit for these identified elements in Process Table K

PROCESS TABLE B - Pretreatment (Mechanical)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What internal system is used for conducting and managing calibration of all relevant equipment identified in
Process Table K ? HMI Installed - PLC Controlled Conforming

Provide the document that lists all relevant equipment identified in Process Table K Not Applicable

How do you ensure calibration are up to date ? Not Applicable


How do you ensure new equipment has been added to the calibration list and inactive equipment has been
removed ? Not Applicable

Are calibration labels present and up to date for listed equipment ? Not Applicable

What is the reaction plan to any failed verification ? Not Applicable

B2.2 Barrels, belts / conveyors, racks, fixtures and drive mechanisms shall be maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you inspect for the integrity of the barrels, racks, belts / conveyors and drive mechanisms ? e.g., wear, Check Daily as per Daily Machine check sheet.
perforations, trap points, plugged holes, door gaps, other damage) As per PM check sheet on schedule. Conforming

Preventive Maintenance plan available for production machine & Supporting Equipments.
What is the maintenance program for attels, belts / conveyors, racks fixtures and drive mechanisms ? Conforming

How is each barrel or rack uniquely identified for tracking purposes ? NA

All filtration equipment shall be maintained


B2.3 The organization shall have a preventive maintenance system that is documented and implemented

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

What is the preventive maintenance program for filters ? NA

How is the filter type identified during use ? NA

If reusable filters are used, do they meet the supplier's recommendations ? NA

If disposable filters are used, do they meet the supplier's recommendations ? NA

What are your criteria for filter replacement and / or cleaning ? NA

What information is used to determine the required mesh size ? NA

How is compatibility with the process determined ? NA

Describe the preventive maintenance program for all solution filters to include plate, filter bag and cartridge NA

Describe the preventive maintenance program for all filters used on ovens, dryers, chillers, blowers and fans,
etc. NA

How is the dust collection system maintained ? (e.g., pressure differential gages / sensors) Dust collection (Cartridge Filter) is cleaned everyday Conforming

All process and equipment alarms shall be tested on a quarterly basis at a minimum
B2.4 The organization shall have a preventive maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is the preventive maintenance program where alarms are used for environmental control, faults, etc. ? All poka yoke verification is being done on daily basis. Conforming

What alarms are tested and define the test frequency ? All poka yoke verification is being done on daily basis. Conforming

PROCESS TABLE B - Pretreatment (Mechanical)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

B2.5 Processing equipment is designed / optimized for "soft handling" of parts

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Are chutes lined to prevent part damage ? Lined with rubber sheet Conforming
What technique(s) are used to minimize drop heights ? Inclined Teflon sheet is used while collecting the material from the belt to trolley Conforming

B2.6 Part transfer equipment is maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is you program to assure cleanliness of belts, conveyors, chutes, vibratory labels, etc. ? Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming
What is your maintenance program for belts, conveyors, chutes, vibratory tables, etc. ? As per PM Plan, Include in Machine Preventive Maintenance Check sheet Conforming

B2.7 In-process and customer containers are managed and maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you identify and segregate in-process containers for different processes ? The design of trolley and handle colour is different Conforming
What is your maintenance program for keeping in-process containers clean and in good condition ? As per monthly plan, Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming
How to you ensure that the customer containers do not degrade the quality of the coated parts ? (e.g.,
customer container may arrive damaged, oily, dirty) Before keeping the finished product in customer container, cleaning of container is being done Conforming

B2.8 The blasting force / energy supply system shall be maintained (e.g., Amperage Draw, PSI)

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Describe the preventive maintenance program for drive motors (e.g., voltage and amperage) As PM Plan, Included in Machine PM Check sheet Conforming

PROCESS TABLE B - Pretreatment (Mechanical)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

3.0 Test Equipment (Process Control and Finished Part Quantity)

Test Equipment shall be verified and calibrated as per Process Table K


Calibrations shall be certified, posted and up to date.
B3.1
A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
Complete the audit for these identified elements in Process Table K

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA


Wet Analysis
Before use, chemicals must be checked for shelf life and / or expiration date Not Applicable

Media flow rate - amp meter Not Applicable

Part dust residue test capacity Dust level is checked on every lot Confirming

Surface profile assessment capability, if applicable Not Applicable

Media fine removal capacity Not Applicable

Media size distribution capacity - sleeves / lab balance, laser Not Applicable

Media pattern assessment capability Once in day verification done Confirming

Part dryness ceramic test media (e.g., Zirblast), if possible Not Applicable

Part cleanliness assessment - Copper surface solution for Hogaboom test surface tension ink, if applicable Not Applicable

Phenolpthalein solution for alkaline contamination check, if applicable Not Applicable

Laboratory Balance (Weight Scale) Not Applicable


Proceed to PT A, PT C or PT G

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

For a spray zinc-flake, see Process Table G.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Observations /
Category / Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Job Audit Measurement
Comments
Actual
Conforming
Minimum Measurements
Item # Actual Condition Monitoring Requirement Actual Condition Nonconforming Range
Requirement supporting time
NA
of Job Audit

1.0 Part Appearance

Pretreated parts are inspected for cleanliness and / or uniform


conversion coating or paint layer (when applicable)

For parts that are anodized prior to paint, time interval


between anodizing and paint shall be documented and less
AT start of production cycle
E1.1 than 24 hours. No chemical sealers shall be used. Manual Not Applicable Not Applicable
and each container of parts
For plastic substrates, appropriate adhesion promoter or
alternative surface preparation have been verified

This must be performed between each coating layer.

Mutilation prevention items (e.g., gloves, belt buckle covers,


E1.2 Manual Not Applicable Ongoing
watch covers) are in place
Paint racks and / or fixtures are visually inspected for Periodic
E1.3 Manual Manual Ongoing Conforming
cleanliness, excessive paint build-up, bent hooks, etc. Verification

There is a paint rack / fixture maintenance program. Program Per preventative maintenance
E1.4 Manual Manual As per PM Plan Conforming
must define rack / fixture cleaning intervals. schedule

E1.5 Surface tension is within specifications, if applicable Manual Not Applicable Once every 4 hours

2.0 Paint Mixing

Paint mixing rooms are controlled (mixing tank, grounding, During Every
E2.1 closed container, properly enclosed space, temperature, clean Automatic / Manual Actual Condition Once every 8 hours Chemical Conforming
environment) Preparation

There is a stock rotation system (FIFO) in place and being


E2.2 Manual Manual Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
utilized to ensure that older material is used first

Paint agitation / time and reduction (solvent package)


E2.3 procedures follow the chemical manufacturer technical data Manual Manual Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
sheet

Appropriate mixing equipment is used, capable of dispersing


settled solids. The blade type, shaft length, and power rating Chemical supplier
E2.4 Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
shall be consistent with the chemical manufacturer approved equipment
recommendations

Prior to start of production


and every process change
Viscosity is verified to be within operational limits and and / or addition
E2.5 Manual Manual Once in 4 hours Conforming
documented
For continuous operations
check once every 8 hours

Prior to start of production


and every process change
Solids content is verified to be within operational limits and and / or addition
E2.6 Manual Manual done Conforming
documented
For continuous operations
check once every 8 hours

Solvent / deionized water additions for viscosity / solids Chemical supplier


E2.7 Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
adjustment shall be documented approved equipment

Prior to start of production


and every process change
Paint temperature is verified to be within operational limits and / or addition
E2.8 Automatic / Manual Manual Every 4 hours Conforming
and documented
For continuous operations
check once every 8 hours

Automatic Max. SAT Continuous monitoring by


E2.9 Temperature (Thermocouple) difference allowed ± Manual controller. Manually verify continious Conforming
5ºC (10ºF) daily
At installation and
The coating filter size and type follow chemical manufacturer
E2.10 Manual Manual replacement of filters per Before use
recommendations
maintenance schedule
PROCESS TABLE E - Spray Coating

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

For a spray zinc-flake, see Process Table G.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Prior to start of production,


Pump pressures are set and pressure readings are verified and
E2.11 Manual Manual every process change and Every Lot Conforming
documented to be within operational limits
once every 8 hours.
Prior to start of production,
Circulation (flow meter, pressure gage) is monitored and
E2.12 Automatic / Manual Manual every process change and Every 4 hours Conforming
documented
once every 8 hours.
Filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures monitored. Prior to start of production,
E2.13 Filers are changed before pressure differential exceeds 10 PSI Automatic / Manual Not Applicable every process change and - -
(70 kPs) once every 8 hours.

3.0 Primer / Promoter

Prior to start of production,


E3.1 Destatioizing air is operational (Plastic parts only) Automatic Not Applicable every process change and
once every 8 hours.
Prior to start of production,
E3.2 Booth balance (air flow is monitored and documented Automatic / Manual every process change and
once every 8 hours.

For manual process, prior to


start of production and every
4 hours.
Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and
E3.3 Automatic / Manual
documented, if applicable
For automated process, at the
start of production and every
process change

Atomizer parameters are set within operational limits


Prior to start of production
- fluid flow
and every process change. For
E3.4 - air pressure (atomizing fan, shaping) Automatic / Manual
continuous operations once
- electrostatics
per day.
- mixing
For manual change, prior to
start of production and every
process change.
E3.5 Application time is verified and documented, if applicable Automatic / Manual
For automated process, verify
once per month, or after every
program change or major
maintenance.
PROCESS TABLE E - Spray Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

For a spray zinc-flake, see Process Table G.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

4.0 Basecoat
Flash times between coats are set at chemical manufacturers At the start of production and
E4.1 Not Applicable
recommendations every process change
At the start of production and
E4.2 Thickness of preceding layers is verified, if applicable Manual Every Lot Conforming
every process change

For manual process, prior to


start of production and every
4 hours.
Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and
E4.3 Manual Every Lot Conforming
documented, if applicable
For automated process, at the
start of production and every
process change

Automatic Max. SAT Continuous monitoring by


E4.4 Temperature (Thermocouple) difference allowed ± Manual controller. Manually verify Every Lot Conforming
5ºC (10ºF) daily

Atomizer parameters are set within operational limits


Prior to start of production
- fluid flow
Only Air Pressure and every process change. For
E4.5 - air pressure (atomizing fan, shaping) Automatic / Manual Every Lot Conforming
- Automatic continuous operations once
- electrostatics
per day.
- mixing
For manual process, prior to
start of production and every
process change.
E4.6 Application time is verified and documented, if applicable Automatic / Manual Not Applicable
For automated process, verify
1 per month, or after every
program change or major
maintenance.
5.0 Basecoat

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Prior to start of production


Oven set points(s) and energy type (Convection/IR/UV,etc) are
and every process change. For
E5.1 verified to be within chemical supplier's recommended limits Manual Actual Condition Automatic
continuous operations once
and documented
every 8 hours.

Prior to start of production


and every two hours. With a
E5.2 Oven temperature is monitored and recorded Automatic Automatic temperature control alarm, Every Lot Conforming
frequency may be reduced to
once every 8 hours.

Automatic Max. SAT Continuous monitoring by


E5.3 Temperature (Thermocouple) difference allowed ± Automatic controller. Manually verify Every Lot Conforming
5ºC (10ºF) daily

For each coating in use, proper cure or drying time parameters


Every three months and after
E5.4 are verified based upon chemical manufacturer technical data Manual Manual Every Month Conforming
oven modification or repair
sheet
Per preventative maintenance
E5.5 Air filter (if used) is replaced Manual Manual As per PM Plan Conforming
schedule
After process change and as
Foil solids content after heated flash meets the chemical
E5.6 Manual Manual recommended by chemical Every lot Conforming
supplier's recommendation
manufacturer

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

For a spray zinc-flake, see Process Table G.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

6.0 Clear Coat


Flash times between coats are set at chemical manufacturers At the start of production and
E6.1 Automatic / Manual Not Applicable
recommendations every process change
At the start of production and
E6.2 Thickness of preceding layer(s) is verified, if applicable Manual
every process change

For manual process, prior to


start of production and every
4 hours.
Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and
E6.3 Automatic / Manual
documented, if applicable
For automated process, at the
start of production and every
process change

Automatic Max. SAT Continuous monitoring by


E6.4 Temperature (Thermocouple) difference allowed ± controller. Manually verify
5ºC (10ºF) daily

Atomizer parameters are set within operational limits


Prior to start of production
- fluid flow
and every process change. For
E6.5 - air pressure (atomizing fan, shaping) Automatic / Manual
continuous operations once
- electrostatics
per day.
- mixing
For manual process, prior to
start of production and every
process change.
E6.6 Application time is verified and documented, if applicable Automatic / Manual
For automated process, verify
1 per month, or after every
program change or major
maintenance.
7.0 Process Equipment

Process equipment shall be verified and calibrated per Process Table K


Calibration shall be certified, posted and up to date
E7.1
A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
Complete the audit for these identified elements in Process Table K

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What internal system is used for conducting and managing calibration of all relevant equipment identified in
Calibration plan of Measuring Instruments Available Conforming
Process Table K?

Provide the document that lists all relevant equipment identified in Process Table K Master list of Measuring Instruments Available Conforming

How do you ensure calibrations are up to date ? Review Calibration plan V/s Actual Conforming

How do you ensure new equipment has been added to the calibration list and inactive equipment has been
Review of Calibration plan and master list in every month. Conforming
removed ?

Are calibration labels present and up to date for listed equipment ? Calibration stickers are available in Calibrated Instruments Conforming
Sent the faulty instrument to calibration lab to re-calibrate.
What is the reaction plan to any failed verification ? Conforming
Reaction plan is defined

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray Coating

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

For a spray zinc-flake, see Process Table G.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

E7.2 Belts / conveyors, racks, fixtures and drive mechanisms shall be maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you inspect for the integrity of the racks, contact points, belts / conveyors and drive mechanism?
Check Daily as per Daily Machine check sheet.
(e.g., wear, perforations, trap points, plugged holes, door gaps, other damage) Conforming
As per PM check sheet on schedule.
Where are the inspection results documented ?

Preventive Maintenance plan available for production machine &


What is your preventative maintenance program for racks, contact points, process tanks and drive mechanism ? Conforming
Supporting Equipments.
What is the maintenance program for mechanical / chemical cleaning of racks and contact points ? Basket Cleaning is done as per decided frequency. Conforming

How is the environmental control maintained in the application area and powder storage area ? (humidity,
Chemical Storage Area - Cold Room Conforming
temperature, air flow, cleanliness, etc.)
How is each rack uniquely identified for tracking purposes ? Not Applicable -
All filtration shall be maintained
E7.3
The organization shall have a preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is the preventative maintenance program for filters ? Not Applicable


How is the filter type identified during use ? Not Applicable
If reusable filters are used, do they meet the supplier's recommendations ? Not Applicable
If disposable filters are used, do they meet the supplier's recommendations ? Not Applicable
What are your criteria for filter replacement and / or cleaning ? Not Applicable
What information is used to determine the required mesh size ? Not Applicable
How is compatibility with the process determined ? Not Applicable

Describe the preventive maintenance program for all solution filters to include plate, filter bag and cartridge Not Applicable

Describe the preventive maintenance program for all air filters used on ovens, dryers, chillers, blowers and fans
Not Applicable
etc.

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

For a spray zinc-flake, see Process Table G.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

All process and equipment alarms shall be tested on a quarterly basis at a minimum
E7.4
The organization shall have a preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is the preventative maintenance program where alarms are used for paint temperature, level control,
All poka yoke verification is being done on daily basis. Conforming
environmental control, faults, etc. ?
What are the alarms that are tested and their test frequency ? All poka yoke verification is being done on daily basis. Conforming
E7.5 Process equipment is designed / optimized for "soft handling" of parts

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Is chutes lined to prevent part damage ? Lined with Teflon sheet Conforming
Inclined Teflon sheet is used while collecting the material from the Conforming
What technique(s) are used to minimize damage while handling ?
belt to trolley
E7.8 In-process and customer containers are managed and maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA


How do you identify and segregate in-process containers for different processes ? The design of trolley and handle colour is different Conforming
What is your maintenance program for keeping in-process containers clean and in good condition ? As per monthly plan, Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming
How do you ensure that the customer containers do not degrade the quality of the coated parts ? (e.g., customer Before keeping the finished product in customer container,
Conforming
container may arrive damaged, oily, dirty) cleaning of container is being done

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray Coating

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

For a spray zinc-flake, see Process Table G.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Electrical system shall be maintained


E7.9
Coater shall have a preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Describe the preventative maintenance program for rectifiers (e.g., voltage and amperage) Not Applicable

All anodes / cathodes, contacts and bussing shall be maintained


Not Applicable
Coater shall have a preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Describe the preventative maintenance program including cleanliness, electrical resistance and electrical shorts Not Applicable

8.0 Test Equipment (Process Control and Finished Part Quantity)

Test Equipment shall be verified and calibrated as per Process Table K


Calibrations shall be certified, posted and up to date.
E8.1
A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
Complete the audit for these identified elements in Process Table K

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

pH meter Not Applicable -


pH Probes (must be solution compatible) Not Applicable -
% Solids Testing - Moisture Analyzer or Lab Oven Not Applicable -
Laboratory Balance (Weight Scale) Daily Verification and Calibration Annually Confirming
Viscosity Cup or equivalent Calibration Annually Confirming
Weight per Gallon capability - Cup or Hydrometer Replacement Annually Confirming
Hand Held Thermometer Replacement Annually Confirming
Paint / Solution Mixer Daily Verification Confirming
Booth Temperature / Humidity Controller Daily Verification and Calibration Annually Confirming
Circulation Flow Meter / Pressure Gauge Calibration Annually Confirming
Process Air Cleanliness Control Not Applicable -
Process Air Control - Shaping, Atomization, Fluids Not Applicable -
Thermocouple done Confirming
Amp Meter / Volt Meter Not Applicable -
PROCESS TABLE E - Spray Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

For a spray zinc-flake, see Process Table G.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Conductivity Meter Not Applicable


Conductivity Probes (must be solution compatible) Not Applicable
Wet Analysis Lab testing chemicals is use after verification of Expiry date or shelf
Conforming
Before use, chemicals must be checked for shelf life and / or expiration date life.
Part dryness ceramic test media (e.g., Zirblast), if possible Zirblast Powder Conforming
Blacklight (for UV tracer identification) Not Applicable
Water immersion Bath Testing Not Applicable
Thickness measurement device - Magnetic induction / Eddy current gauge or Microscope for cross sectional
Not Applicable
thickness measurement
Weighing Balance (0 - 420 gram) & XRF Machine (Fischerscope
Coating weight capability (as alternative to film thickness measurement) Conforming
Machine) , Calibration Annually
Salt Spray Cabinet Presto Salt Spray Chamber, Calibration Annually Conforming
Ultrasonic Cleaner Not Applicable
Coefficient of Friction / Torque Tension (required for fasteners) Not Applicable
Adhesion Test Capability - scribe and tape Nichiban Tape Conforming
Cure Test - Solvent rub or hardness, if applicable Not Applicable
Gloss Meter Not Applicable
Color Meter Not Applicable
Light Booth Not Applicable
Proceed to PT 1

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip-Spin and All Zinc-Flake Application Methods

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be
documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

Category / Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observations / Job Audit Measurement
Comments
Actual
Item # Minimum Requirement Actual Monitoring Requirement Actual Conforming Range Measurements
Condition Condition Nonconforming NA supporting time
of Job Audit

1.0 Coating Material Application

G1.1 Pretreatment, coating and post treatment shall be completed All described processes in Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
in the same building the same building

After pretreatment, and immediately before each coating,


G1.2 parts are inspected for flash rust, wetness, cleanliness, Visual Inspection Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
phosphate coating uniformity (when applicable), oil or other
defects

G1.3 Containers used to hold parts between coating operations are Visual Inspection Yes Each container Ongoing Conforming
free from blast media, oil, grease or other contaminants

Parts shall be stored indoors in a staging area that does not


affect the cleanliness and quality of parts. The staging area
G1.4 shall not be adjacent to open doorways or windows exposing Designated staging area. Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
parts to water, dirt, fumes, blast media or other
contaminations.

After pretreatment, parts shall be coated within the time limit


G1.5 Per application manual / Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
specified by the customer specification and / or chemical
customer specification
supplier application manual

2.0 Coating Material

Manual measurement Supplier Test


G2.1 Incoming coating material viscosity and percent solids are Each new lot of coating material Every Batch Conforming
and compare to Certificate
checked per chemical supplier application manual
certification verification

Appropriate mixing equipment shall be used and capable of


G2.2 dispersing settled solids. The blade type, shaft length, and Chemical supplier Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
power rating shall be consistent with chemical supplier's approved equipment
recommendations. Hand mixers are not allowed.

G2.3 Coating material shall be stored per chemical supplier Per chemical supplier Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
requirements. requirements

G2.4 When not in use, coating material is kept covered and / or Per chemical supplier Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
sealed per chemical supplier requirements. requirements

G2.5 Coating material storage area is clean and organized so each Manual Yes Ongoing Ongoing Conforming
coating material is easily found and to prevent contamination.

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip-Spin and All Zinc-Flake Application Methods

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be
documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

3.0 Coating Process and Bath

Verify that the coating bath is uniformaly mixed (e.g., no


G3.1 Manual Yes Prior to start of production and before Before start of Conforming
setting or agglomeration checked by viscosity cup and open
any additions. production.
gage

G3.2 Secondary and feed tanks are verified for setting Manual NA Prior to start of production and every NA
agglomeration and viscosity shift.

G3.3 Coating material filtration as required by chemical supplier Manual Yes Per preventative maintenace schedule As per schedule Conforming
guidelines / manual.

G3.4 Coating material temperature Automatic / Manual Manual Prior to start of production and once Every Batch Conforming
every 2 hours *

Automatic Max. SAT Continuous


G3.5 Temperature (Thermocouple) Continuous monitoring by controller.
difference allowed ± 5ºC Automatic Monitoring Conforming
Manually verify daily.
(10ºF) Through HMI.

G3.6 Viscosity as required by chemical supplier guidelines / manual Manual YES Prior to start of production and once Start of Conforming
every 2 hours * production

G3.7 Percent (%) solids by chemical supplier guidelines / manual Manual NA Prior to start of production and before -
every process change

G3.8 Volume (coating material depth in process tank) Automatic / Manual Manual Prior to start of production and once Before start of Conforming
every 2 hours * production.

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Equipment surfaces in contact with coating (e.g., vibratory


G3.9 Manual Manual Once every 8 hours and before every Every lot Conforming
feed tables) are free of loose debris and excess coating
process change
buildup

Basket shall be undamaged and free from coating buildup.


G3.10 Manual Manual Prior to start of production, every Before start of Conforming
Damaged or dirty baskets shall be removed from service
process change, and every 4 hours. production.
immediately.

G3.11 Coating material and / or viscosity reducing agent additions Manual Manual Each addition Yes Conforming
are verified before production continues.

Viscosity cups are cleaned after each use. The cups shall be
G3.12 stored in a designated location and protected against Manual Manual After each use Yes Conforming
contamination and damage.

4.0 Application Parameters Dip-Spin

G4.1 Loading weight shall be defined for each part and documented Automatic / Manual Automatic Every lot Yes Conforming
in the processing manual, traveler, or process recipe.

G4.2 Baskets are ketp less than 70% full by volume Automatic / Manual Automatic Every lot Yes Conforming

Coating parametrers are controlled and verified via external


G4.3 display (dip time, spin speed, spin time, spin cycle, spin Automatic / Manual Automatic Every lot Yes Conforming
direction and basket tilting)

There is a system (raking, vibe table, etc.) to uniformly


G4.4 Automatic / Manual Manual Every coating load Material spread Conforming
distribute parts prior to curing to ensure proper cure and
seperately.
prevent parts from sticking and minimize touch marks

Inspect prior to start of production, Before start of


G4.5 Equipment and fixtures that are in contact with parts (baskets, Manual Manual Conforming
every proces change and every 4 production -
loading tables, chutes, conveyor belts, etc.) are kept clean
hours. daily

G4.6 There shall be soft handling of parts (shallow drops, lined Automatic / Manual Automatic / Ongoing Yes Conforming
chutes and hoppers, bumper boards, etc.) Manual

Parts are within recommended temperature range per


G4.7 chemical supplier recommendation or application manual Manual Manual Ongoing Yes Conforming
before each coating step.

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip-Spin and All Zinc-Flake Application Methods

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be
documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

5.0 Application Parameters Spray

Parts shall be properly racked or fixture to minimize touch


G5.1 marks. Racks and fixtures shall be defined for each part and Manual Not Applicable Every lot
documented in the process manual, traveler, or process
recipe.

G5.2 Parts shall be completely within the spray pattern. Manual Every lot
Coating parameters shall be controlled, verified and
G5.3 documented (e.g., air pressure, voltage, electrostatics, Automatic / Manual Every lot
material flow)
Inspect prior to start of production,
G5.4 Equipment, racks and fixtures that are in contact with parts Manual every proces change and every 4
are kept clean
hours.
Parts are within recommended temperature range per
G5.5 chemical supplier recommendation or application manual Manual Ongoing
before each coating step.

Prior to start of produciton and every 4


G5.6 Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and Automatic / Manual hours. With a control alarm, frequency
documented, if applicable
may be reduced to once every 8 hours.

G5.7 Conveyor speed is verified and documented Automatic Start of production and every process
change

6.0 Process Equipment

Process equipment shall be verified and calibrated per Process Table K


G6.1 Calibration shall be certified, posted and up to date
A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
Complete the audit for these identifed elements in Process Table K

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What internal system is used for conducting and managing calibration of all relevant equipment identified in Calibration plan of Measuring Instruments Available Conforming
Process Table K?

Provide the document that lists all relevant equipment identified in Process Table K Master list of Measuring Instruments Avaialable Conforming

How do you ensure calibrations are up to date ? Review Calibration plan V/s Actual Conforming

How do you ensure new equipment has been added to the calibration list and inactive equipment has been Review of Calibration plan and master list in every month. Conforming
removed ?

Are calibration labels present and up to date for listed equipment ? Calibration stickers are available in Calibrated Instruments Conforming

What is the reaction plan to any failed verification ? Sent the faulty instrument to calibration lab to re-calibrate. Conforming
G6.2 Baskets, coating tank, belts / conveyors, racks, fixtures and drive mechanisims shall be maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you inspect for the integrity of the baskets, coating tank, belts / conveyors and drive mechanisim?
Check Daily as per Daily Machine checksheet. Conforming
(e.g., wear, perforations, trap points, plugged holes, door gaps, other damage)
As per PM checksheet on scheudule.
Where are the inspection results documented ?

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

Preventive Maintenance plan available for production machine & Supporting


What is your preventative maintenance program for baskets, coating tank and drive mechanisim ? Equipments. Conforming

What is the maintenace program for mechnical / chemical cleaning of baskets, and coating tanks ? Basket Cleaning is done as per decided frequency. Conforming

How is each basket and coating tank uniquely identified for tracking purposes ? All basket are identified with Basket No. Conforming

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip-Spin and All Zinc-Flake Application Methods

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be
documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

G6.3 Racks and fixtures shall be maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you inspect for the integrity of the racks and fixgures ?
Check Daily as per Daily Machine checksheet for Baskets Conforming
(e.g., broken electrical contacts, coating build up and other damage)
As per PM checksheet on scheudule.
Where are the inspection results documented ?

What is your preventative maintenance program for racks and fixtures ? Preventive Maintenance plan available for production machine & Supporting Conforming
Equipments for Baskets
How is each rack or fixture identified for tracking purpose ? NA

G6.4 All filtration equipment shall be maintained


The organisation shall have a preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is the preventative maintenance program for filters ? NA


How is the filter type identifed during use ? NA
If reusable filters are used, do they meet the supplier's recommendations ? NA
If disposable filters are used, do they meet the supplier's recommendations ? NA
What are your criteria for filter replacement and / or cleaning ? NA
What information is used to determine the required mesh size ? NA
How is compatibility with the process determined ? NA
Describe the preventive maintenance program for all solution filters to include plate, filter bag and cartridge NA

Describe the preventive maintenance program for all air filters used on ovens, dryers, chillers, blowers and fans etc. Preventive Maintenance plan available for all Supporting Equipments. Conforming

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip-Spin and All Zinc-Flake Application Methods

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be
documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

G6.5 Magnets may be used to remove metal fines.


If used, the organisation shall have preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is the preventative maintenance program for magnets ? NA NA

G6.6 All process and equipment alarms shall be tested on a quarterly basis at a minimum
The organization shall have a preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is the preventative maintenance program where alarms are used for solution temperature, level control, All poka yoke verification is being done on daily basis. Conforming
environmental control, faults, etc. ?
What are the alarms that are tested and their test frequency ? All poka yoke verification is being done on daily basis. Conforming
G6.7 Process equipment is designed / optimized for "soft handling" of parts

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Are chutes lined to prevent part damage ? Lined with teflon sheet Conforming

What technique(s) are used to minimize drop heights ? Inclined teflon sheet is used while collecting the material from the belt to Conforming
trolley
G6.8 Part transfer equipment is maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is your program to assure cleanliness of belts, conveyors, chutes, vibratory tables, etc ? Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming
What is your maintenance program for belts, conveyors, chutes, vibratory tables, etc ? Inlude in Machine Preventive Maintenance Checksheet Conforming

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip-Spin and All Zinc-Flake Application Methods

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be
documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

G6.9 In-process and customer containers are managed and maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA


How do you identify and segregate in-process containers for different processes ? The design of trolley and color is different Conforming
What is your maintenance program for keeping in-process containers clean and in good condition ? Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming
How do you ensure that the customer containers do not degrade the quality of the coated parts ? Before keeping the finished product in customer container, cleaning of Conforming
(e.g., customer container may arrive damaged, oily, dirty) containner is being done

7.0 Test Equipment (Process Control and Finished Part Quantity)

Test Equipment shall be verified and calibrated as per Process Table K


E8.1 Calibrations shall be certified, posted and up to date.
A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
Complete the audit for these identified elements in Process Table K

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Wet Analysis Lab testinng chemicals is use after verification of Expiry date or shelf life. Conforming
Before use, chemicals must be checked for shelf life and / or expiration date

pH meter Verification of PH meter is being done with ph solution and Calibrated Annually Conforming

pH Probes (must be solution campatible) Verification of PH meter is being done with ph solution and Calibrated Annually Conforming

% Solids Testing - Moisture Analyzer or Lab Oven / Lab Balance Not Applicable
Laboratory Balance (Weight Scale) Verification of Weighing Balance is being done with standard weight Bar and Conforming
Calibrated Annually
Viscosity Cup or equivalent NA

Hand Held Thermometer Verification of Glass thermometer is being done with Master Glass Conforming
Thermometer - Replace Annually
Paint / Solution Mixer Daily Verification
Temperature Controller Daily Verification & Calibration every six months Conforming
Amp Meter / Volt Meter Not Applicable
Filters Not Applicable
Conductivity Meter Not Applicable
PROCESS TABLE G - Dip-Spin and All Zinc-Flake Application Methods

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be
documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

Conductivity Probes (must be solution compatible) NA


Lab Oven Controller NA
Thickness measurement device - Magnetic induction / Eddy current gauge or Microscope for cross sectional XRF Machine (Fischerscope Machine) / Microscope for cross sectional Conforming
thickness measurement thickness measurement, Calibration Annually
Salt Spray Cabinet Presto Salt Spray Chamber, Calibration Annually Conforming
Ultrasonic Cleaner, if applicable NA
Coefficient of Friction / Torque Tension (required for fasteners) NA
Scribe and Tape for Adhesion Test Nichiban Tape Conforming

Coating weight capability (as alternative to film thickness measurement) Weighing Balance (0 - 420 gram) & XRF Machine (Fischerscope Machine) , Conforming
Calibration Annually
Part dryness ceramic test media (e.g., Zirblast) Zirblast Powder Conforming
Blacklight (for UV tracer identification) NA
Booth Temperature / Humidity Controller Hygrometer, Calibration Annually Conforming
Process Air Cleanliness Control NA
Process Air Control - Shaping, Atomization, Fluids NA
Cure Test - Solvent rub or hardness, if applicable NA
Proceed to PT 1

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

PROCESS TABLE I - Cure

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Observations /
Category / Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Job Audit Measurement
Comments
Actual
Conforming
Item # Minimum Actual Monitoring Requirement Actual Condition Range Measurements
Nonconforming
Requirement Condition supporting time
NA
of Job Audit

1.0 Curing Process

With alarm system set per limits (of


I1.3): Continuous recording
Oven control temperature is monitored and recorded Continuous
I1.1 Automatic Yes Conforming - -
continuously by a recording instrument No alarm system : Review and approve Recording by HMI
data every process change and every 2
hours

I1.2 Part temperature shall be sufficiently cool before next Automatic / Manual Manual Each batch Yes Conforming - -
operations (coating, unloading, packing, etc.)

I1.3 Temperature control limits shall be defined to ensure the part Automatic Yes Each process change Continuous Conforming 320 - 355 335
temperature is within the chemical supplier recommendation Recording by HMI

For batch oven / spray processes, prior


Automatic Max. SAT to start of production and every part
I1.4 Temperature (Thermocouple) difference allowed ± Yes change. For automated processes, at Every Lot Conforming - -
5ºC (10ºF) oven start-up, once every 8 hours, and
every process change

For batch oven/ continuous processes,


Process time parameters shall be verified against the control prior to start of production and every
I1.5 plan (conveyor / belt, speed set point, batch timer set point, Manual Yes part family change. For automated Every Lot Conforming - -
index time) processes, at oven start-up, once every
8 hours, and every process change

Per oven manufacturer, filter supplier


I1.6 Air filter (if used) change is scheduled Manual NA NA
recommendation
Cure testing is performed per part specification on a At oven start-up, every process or part
I1.7 Manual NA NA
production part, if applicable change and once every 8 hours

I1.8 Coating adhesion test is performed per part specification on a Manual Yes At oven start-up, every process change Every Lot Conforming - -
production part and once every 8 hours
Appearance requirements checks (color, gloss, defects, etc.) At oven start-up, every process change Defects (Every
I1.9 Manual Yes Conforming - -
are performed per part specification and once every 8 hours Lot)
TUS data shall be evaluated to verify the oven is capable of Verification is
I1.10 meeting the minimum curing time and temperature Manual Yes After each TUS being done after Conforming Every Month Every Month
requirements each TTR,

PROCESS TABLE I - Cure

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

2.0 Process Equipment

I2.1 Thermocouples shall be checked and replaced per Section P3. 1 and Process Table requirements

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Are thermocouples calibrated before first use and within the temperature range in which they will be used ? followed Conforming

Do thermocouples meet the accuracy requirements of the Section P3.1 Tables ? Accuracy requirements to be met Conforming

Is thermocouple usage properly documented as applicable per section P3.1.2 (e.g., date placed in service,
followed Conforming
uses ?)

Are thermocouples replaced in accordance with Tables P3.1.1, P3.1.2 and P3.1.3 ? followed Conforming

Do thermocouples calibration certificates conform with Section P3.1.1.1 ? met Conforming


I2.2 Calibration of instruments shall conform to the requirements defined in Section P3.2 and the Process Tables

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Are instruments calibrations performed at the intervals specified in Table P3.2.1 ? Yes, as per calibration plan Conforming
How do you ensure instrument calibrations are up to date ? Yes, as per calibration plan Conforming
Do instruments meet the accuracy requirements specified in Table P3.2.1 as applicable ? Yes Meeting Conforming
Are offset values within the acceptable limits defined in Section P3.2.2 ? Yes Meeting Conforming
Is there a document offset procedure as defined in Section P3.2.2 ? Not applicable -
Does the documented offset procedure indicate who has the authority to approve the use of offsets ? Not applicable -
How is approval of offset documented ? Not applicable -
Do calibration labels conform with the requirements established in Section P3.2.4.1 ? Yes, Meeting Conforming
Do calibration reports conform with the requirements established in Section P3.2.4.2 ? Yes, Meeting Conforming
PROCESS TABLE I - Cure

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

I2.3 System Accuracy Test (SAT) for all control, monitoring and recording temperature system (instrument, lead wire and the thermocouple (RTD) shall conform to Section P3.3

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Are system accuracy tests performed on all oven / dryers control, monitoring and recording temperature followed Conforming
systems ?
Are system accuracy tests performed at the intervals specified in Section P3.3.1 ? followed Conforming
Are system accuracy tests performed after maintenance per Section P3.3.3 ? followed Conforming
How do you ensure the measuring junctions of the test and oven control, monitoring or recording followed Conforming
thermocouple / RTD are within 50 mm (2 inches) of each other as specified in Section P3.3.4.1.2 ?
Do system accuracy tests meet the tolerance requirements specified in Section P3.3.4.1.3 ? followed Conforming
Do system Accuracy Test records conform with the requirements established in Section P3.3.5 ? followed Conforming
I2.4 Temperature Uniformity Surveys (TUS) of all ovens shall conform to Section P3.4

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Are temperature uniformity surveys performed annually as specified in Section P3.4.1 ? followed Conforming
Are temperature uniformity surveys performed after oven modification or repair per Section P3.4.1.2 ? followed Conforming
How are oven modifications or repairs documented per section P3.4.1.3 ? followed Conforming
How do you determine whether oven modifications or repairs have altered the temperature uniformity followed Conforming
characteristics of the oven ?
If the oven operating temperature range of the qualified work zone is greater than 170ºC / 305ºF, then were
followed Conforming
the minimum and maximum temperatures tested per P3.4.2 ?
Are readings of all TUS thermocouples and control thermocouples within ± 10ºC (± 20ºF) of the temperature
controller set-point value or other more stringent customer specification, process sheet or technical data followed Conforming
sheet ?
Was the time required to achieve target part temperature within the time limit specified in customer followed Conforming
specification, process sheet or technical data sheet ?
PROCESS TABLE I - Cure

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Was the required time at temperature achieved (for continuous / semi-continuous ovens only) ? Yes, continuous oven Conforming
Was the upper temperature tolerance exceeded at any time by any TUS thermocouple or temperature
Not exceed from upper temperature tolerance Conforming
controller thermocouple ?

Was the lower temperature tolerance continually maintained after reaching the beginning of the soak period ? Continually Maintained Conforming

How does the organization internally define suitable time at temperature for determining pass / fail status of
ok Conforming
TUS ?
Does TUS reporting conform with the requirements established in P3.4 ? - -
I2.5 Baskets, belts / conveyors, racks, fixtures and drive mechanisms shall be maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you inspect for the integrity of the baskets, racks, belts / conveyors and drive mechanism? Check Daily as per Daily Machine check sheet. Conforming
(e.g., wear, perforations, trap points, plugged holes, door gaps, other damage) As per PM check sheet on schedule.

Preventive Maintenance plan available for production machine & Supporting


What is your preventative maintenance program for baskets, racks, belts / conveyors and drive mechanisms ? Equipments. Conforming

What is the maintenance program for mechanical / chemical cleaning of baskets, racks, belts / conveyors and Basket Cleaning is done as per decided frequency. Conforming
drive mechanisms ?
How is each basket or rack uniquely identified for tracking purposes ? All basket are identified with Basket No. Conforming

I2.6 All air filters shall be maintained


The organization shall have a preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is your preventative maintenance program for air filters ? NA

How do you verify that the replacement filter is appropriate ? NA

I2.7 All process and equipment alarms shall be tested on a quarterly basis at a minimum
The organization shall have a preventative maintenance system that is documented and implemented

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is your preventative maintenance program where alarms are used for temperature, environmental All poka yoke verification is being done on daily basis. Conforming
control, faults, etc. ?.

What are the alarm that are tested and their test frequency ? All poka yoke verification is being done on daily basis. Conforming

PROCESS TABLE I - Cure

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

Column H and I are used for the Job Audit (Section 4)


Regularly scheduled measurements (e.g., temperature, concentrations, pH) are to be entered in the appropriate row
For section that are not applicable mark NA in the comments column

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.
To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies must be documented
If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

I2.8 Process equipment is designed / optimized for "soft handling" of parts

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Is chutes lined to prevent part damage ? Lined with Teflon sheet Conforming
What technique(s) are used to minimize drop heights / part damage ? Inclined Teflon sheet is used while collecting the material from the belt to troll Conforming

I2.9 Part transfer equipment is maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

What is your program to assure cleanliness of belts, conveyors, chutes, vibratory tables, etc. ? Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming
What is your maintenance program for belts, conveyors, chutes, vibratory tables, etc. ? Include in Machine Preventive Maintenance Check sheet Conforming

I2.10 In-process and customer containers are managed and maintained

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

How do you identify and segregate in-process containers for different processes ? The design of trolley and colour is different Conforming
What is your maintenance program for keeping in-process containers clean and in good condition ? Daily 5S activity is being done Conforming
How to you ensure that the customer containers do not degrade the quality of the coated parts ? Before keeping the finished product in customer container, cleaning of Conforming
(e.g., customer container may arrive damaged, oily, dirty) container is being done

3.0 Process Equipment

Test equipment shall be verified and calibrated per Process Table K


Calibration shall be certified, posted and up to date
I3.1
A system shall be used to track calibration dates of equipment
Complete the audit for these identified elements in Process Table K

Guidance Objective Evidence / Comments Conforming Nonconforming NA

Hand Held Thermometer NA


Lab Oven NA

Travelling Temperature Recorder (e.g., Datapaq or equivalent) Calibration Annually Conforming


Proceed to PT 1

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

PROCESS TABLE K - Process Control and Testing Equipment Verification and Calibration

All requirements given below are subordinate to applicable customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies
must be documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Job Audit Measurements


Condition Condition Actual
Item # Equipment Type Verification Frequency Calibration / Certification Observations /
Nonconforming Nonconforming Measurements
Frequency Comments Range
NA NA supporting time
of job audit

Control chemicals (e.g., Hogeboom Before use - must be checked for Shelf life of chemicals
K1.1 solution, buffers, vibrants, indicators, Daily Conforming shelf life / Expiration date, Conforming mentioned on chemical
surface tension in, viscosity oil) contamination containers

K1.2 Thermocouple Per Section 3 Pyrometry Not Meeting Per Section 3 Pyrometry Conforming Used calibrated
thermocouple

K1.3 Booth Temperature / Humidity Once every 4 hours Every Lot Every 6 months - Conforming Calibration Annually
Controller

K1.4 Circulation / Flow Meter / Pressure At the beginning of production and at Not required Annually Conforming
Gauge every material change

K1.5 Process Air Cleanliness Control Per equipment manufacturer's NA Annually NA


specifications

K1.6 Amp Meter / Volt Meter At the beginning of production and at NA Annually NA
every material change

K1.7 pH Meter Per equipment manufacturer's Daily Annually Conforming Calibration Plan - Yearly
specifications
Once every 4 hours, using a minimum of 2
K1.8 pH Probe buffer solutions near the min and max of Daily Annually Conforming
the chemical control range

K1.9 Conductivity Meter Per equipment manufacturer's NA Annually NA


specifications
Once every 4 hours, using a minimum of 2
K1.10 Conductivity Probe reference solutions near the min and max NA NA NA
of the chemical control range
Once every 4 hours, using a minimum of 2
K1.11 Ion Selective (ISE) Probe reference solutions near the min and max NA NA
of the chemical control range

K1.12 Laboratory Balance Monthly using a minimum of 2 reference Daily Annually Conforming Yearly Calibration Plan
mass standards

K1.13 Atomic Absorption (AA) Before each use NA Annually NA

PROCESS TABLE K - Process Control and Testing Equipment Verification and Calibration

All requirements given below are subordinate to applicable customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies
must be documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Job Audit Measurements


Condition Condition Actual
Item # Equipment Type Verification Frequency Calibration / Certification Observations /
Nonconforming Nonconforming Measurements
Frequency Comments Range
NA NA supporting time
of job audit

K1.14 Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Before each use NA Annually

K1.15 ION Chromatography (IC) Before each use NA Annually

K1.16 X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Daily. Thickness and alloy for each Conforming Annually Conforming
combination of coating and substrate
K1.17 Hardness Tester Daily NA Annually

K1.18 Profilometer Daily NA Annually

K1.19 Lab Rectifier NA NA Annually

K1.20 Ultrasonic Cleaner Monthly (e.g., foil test) NA Annually

K1.21 Hand Held Digital Thermometer NA NA Annually

K1.22 Glass Thermometer Visual Inspection before each use Yes Annually Replacement Conforming

K1.23 Pipettees - must be checked for broken Before each use Yes NA
tips

K1.24 Salt Spray Cabinet Daily Yes Annually Conforming Calibration once in a
year.
K1.25 Water Immersion Bath Per Section 3 Pyrometry NA Per Section 3 Pyrometry

K1.26 Freezer Per Section 3 Pyrometry NA Per Section 3 Pyrometry

K1.27 Thickness Tester Every 8 hours NA Annually NA

K1.28 CASS Cabinet Daily NA Annually

Microscope
K1.29 100x fir surface profile Visual Inspection before each use NA NA
500x fir crystal morphology

K1.30 Lab Oven Per Section 3 Pyrometry - Annually Conforming Calibration once in a
year.
K1.31 Muffle Furnace Per Section 3 Pyrometry - Per Section 3 Pyrometry

PROCESS TABLE K - Process Control and Testing Equipment Verification and Calibration

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 3 Issued 07/2020

All requirements given below are subordinate to applicable customer / OEM specific requirements

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing or greater frequencies. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions. To justify reduced monitoring frequencies, a minimum of 30 consecutive measurements (data points) at stated frequencies
must be documented. If any data points at reduced monitoring frequencies are outside of control limits, then revert back to the frequencies stated under the minimum requirements.

For multiple tanks that serve the same purpose copy and paste sections as needed

Job Audit Measurements


Condition Condition Actual
Item # Equipment Type Verification Frequency Calibration / Certification Observations /
Nonconforming Nonconforming Measurements
Frequency Comments Range
NA NA supporting time
of job audit

K1.32 Coefficient of Friction / Torque Tension NA NA Annually


Testing (required for fastners)

K1.33 Refractrometer Monthly NA NA

K1.34 Spectrophotometer Monthly NA Annually

K1.35 Color Meter Daily NA Annually

K1.36 Glass Meter Monthly NA Annually

K1.37 Digital Temperature Recorder (e.g., NA NA Annually


DataPaq)

K1.38 Moisture Analyser NA NA Annually

Visual Inspection
K1.39 Filters / Sieves - blast media NA NA
Lab - before each use
distribution, impurity removal
Production - each time media is added

K1.40 Linguard® 101 Meter Visual Inspection NA Every 3 months

K1.41 ORP Meter (in process) When difference is greater than 30 mv NA Annually
when compared to lab meter
K1.42 ORP Meter (Laboratory NA NA Every 30 days

K1.43 Line viscosity cup or equivalent Every 14 days NA NA

K1.44 Master viscosity cup or equivalent Every 30 days NA Annually Conforming Once in a year

K1.45 Weight per Gallon Cup / Hydrometer Before each us NA NA

K1.46 Tape (adhesion testing / dust residue Before each us NA NA


check)
K1.47 Scribe Tool Before each us NA NA

K1.48 Blacklight for UV tracer identification Before each us NA NA

K1.49 Timer / Stopwatch Before each us NA Replace Annually Conforming

© 2020 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

You might also like