Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Ebook Active Geophysical Monitoring 2Nd Edition Junzo Kasahara Editor All Chapter PDF
Textbook Ebook Active Geophysical Monitoring 2Nd Edition Junzo Kasahara Editor All Chapter PDF
Edited by
Junzo Kasahara
Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan; Former Japan Atomic
Agency, Mizunami, Gifu, Japan; Kawasaki Geological
Engineering Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Michael S. Zhdanov
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Utah, Salt
Lake City, UT, United States; TechnoImaging, Salt Lake City, UT,
United States
Hitoshi Mikada
Department of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Kyoto
University, Kyoto-Daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
xxi
xxii List of contributors
Eva Caspari
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia;
University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Julia Correa
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Leif Cox
TechnoImaging, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Martin Ćuma
The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; TechnoImaging, Salt
Lake City, UT, United States
Tom Daley
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
Tess Dance
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; CSIRO, Australian Resources Research
Centre, Kensington, WA, Australia
S.A. Elagin
Altae-Sayan Branch of GS RAS, Acad. Koptyug Prospect, 3, Novosibirsk,
Russia
A.F. Emanov
Altae-Sayan Branch of GS RAS, Acad. Koptyug Prospect, 3, Novosibirsk,
Russia
Alexey G. Fatyanov
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
Barry Freifeld
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
Naoyuki Fujii
Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan
Boris M. Glinsky
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
Stanislav Glubokovskikh
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Andrew Greenwood
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia;
University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Andrey P. Grigoryuk
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
Boris Gurevich
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia;
CSIRO, Australian Resources Research Centre, Kensington, WA, Australia
List of contributors xxiii
Muran Han
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City,
UT, United States
Yoko Hasada
Former Japan Atomic Agency, Mizunami, Gifu, Japan; Daiwa Exploration and
Consulting Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Jan Henninges
German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Ryoya Ikuta
Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan
Tomohiko Ise
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kindai University, Higashi-Osaka, Japan
Kiyoshi Ito
DPRI, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Shinji Ito
NTT DATA CCS, Tokyo, Japan
Monika Ivandic
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Michael Jervis
Geophysics Technology Team, EXPEC Advanced Research Center, Saudi
Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Christopher Juhlin
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Shiori Kamei
Department of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto-
Daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
Aya Kamimura
Kawasaki Geological Engineering Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Dmitriy A. Karavaev
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
Junzo Kasahara
Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan; Former Japan Atomic Agency,
Mizunami, Gifu, Japan; Kawasaki Geological Engineering Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
Japan
V.N. Kashun
Seismological Branch of GS RAS, Acad. Koptyug Prospect, 3, Novosibirsk,
Russia
Akio Katsumata
Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan
Shozo Kawamura
Graduate School of Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology,
Toyohashi, Japan
xxiv List of contributors
Thomas Kempka
German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Anton Kepic
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Marat S. Khairetdinov
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics
SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia; Novosibirsk State Technical University,
Novosibirsk, Russia
Valery V. Kovalevsky
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
Takahiro Kunitomo
Former Japan Atomic Agency, Mizunami, Gifu, Japan; Nagoya University,
Nagoya, Japan; Current address: Faculty of Science, Nagoya University, Aichi,
Japan; Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Mizunami,
Gifu, Japan
Omar Lafouza
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh, Saudi
Arabia
A.V. Liseikin
Seismological Branch of GS RAS, Acad. Koptyug Prospect, 3, Novosibirsk,
Russia
Stefan Lüth
German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Alberto Marsala
Saudi Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Masami Matsubara
Graduate School of Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology,
Toyohashi, Japan
Jun Matsushima
Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hitoshi Mikada
Department of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto-
Daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
Kei Murase
Kawasaki Geological Engineering Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Hiromichi Nagao
Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Mizunami, Gifu,
Japan; Current address: Earthquake Research Institute, The University of
Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
List of contributors xxv
Takahiro Nakajima
Geological Carbon Dioxide Storage Technology Research Association, Kyoto,
Japan; Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Mizunami,
Gifu, Japan; Current address: Research Institute of Innovative Technology for
the Earth, Kyoto, Japan
Osamu Nishizawa
International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research, Kyushu University,
Fukuoka, Japan
Ben Norden
German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Mitsuyoshi Osaki
Graduate School of Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology,
Toyohashi, Japan
V.P. Panchenko
Russian research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia
Roman Pevzner
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Dmitry Popik
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Sofya Popik
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Matthias Raab
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia
Dennis Rippe
German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Michelle Robertson
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger
German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Galina F. Sedukhina
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
V.S. Seleznev
Seismological Branch of GS RAS, Acad. Koptyug Prospect, 3, Novosibirsk,
Russia
Naotaka Shigeta
Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Mizunami, Gifu,
Japan; Current address: Horonobe Underground Research Center,
Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Hokkaido, Japan
Gulnara M. Shimanskaya
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
xxvi List of contributors
Gyulnara M. Shimanskaya
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
Valeriya Shulakova
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; CSIRO, Australian Resources Research
Centre, Kensington, WA, Australia
Rajindar Singh
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia
Robert Smith
Geophysics Technology Team, EXPEC Advanced Research Center, Saudi
Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
V.M. Solovyev
Altae-Sayan Branch of GS RAS, Acad. Koptyug Prospect, 3, Novosibirsk,
Russia
David Sunwall
TechnoImaging, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Junichi Takekawa
Department of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto-
Daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
Konstantin Tertyshnikov
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Gennady M. Tsibulchik
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
Kayoko Tsuruga
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan; Former
Japan Atomic Agency, Mizunami, Gifu, Japan
Tsyren A. Tubanov
Geological Institute SB RAS, Ulan-Ude, Russia
Takumi Ueda
Department of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Waseda University,
Tokyo, Japan
Takemichi Ueki
Graduate School of Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology,
Toyohashi, Japan
Milovan Urosevic
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
E.P. Velikhov
Russian research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia
Le Wan
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City,
UT, United States; TechnoImaging, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
List of contributors xxvii
Shuming Wang
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City,
UT, United States
Toshiki Watanabe
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Max Watson
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia
Ziqiu Xue
Geological Carbon Dioxide Storage Technology Research Association, Kyoto,
Japan; Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth, Kyoto, Japan
Alexander A. Yakimenko
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia; Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk,
Russia
Koshun Yamaoka
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Sinem Yavuz
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Yasuhiro Yoshida
Meteorological College, Chiba, Japan
V.I. Yushin
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics of Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences (IPGG SB RAS), Acad. Koptyug Prospect, 3,
Novosibirsk, Russia
Michael S. Zhdanov
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City,
UT, United States; TechnoImaging, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Sasha Ziramov
CO2CRC, Carlton, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
List of reviewers
Naoyuki Fujii
Junichi Takekawa
Takahiro Nakajima
Ehsan Jamali Hondori
Toshinori Kimura
Kyosuke Okamoto
Michael Zhdanov
Hitoshi Mikada
Junzo Kasahara
xxviii
CHAPTER
Elements of active
geophysical monitoring
theory 1.1
Anatoly S. Alekseev, Gennady M. Tsibulchik, Valery V. Kovalevsky
and Andrey S. Belonosov
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB RAS, Novosibirsk,
Russia
Chapter Outline
1.1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3
1.1.2 Main properties of the integral precursor ........................................................... 4
1.1.3 Multidisciplinary model of integral precursor and combined inverse problems...... 9
1.1.4 Methods for vibroseismic monitoring of seismic-prone zones ............................ 12
1.1.5 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 15
Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................... 16
References ............................................................................................................... 16
1.1.1 Introduction
Different types of geophysical precursors are used in earthquake prediction to
reduce the probability of unexpected catastrophic earthquakes. Several years prior
to such earthquakes, some anomalies occur within geophysical fields, such as
crustal deformation, seismicity, and electric conductivity. Zones that manifest
such anomalies will migrate within 200300 km from the epicenter of a subse-
quent earthquake. The migration mechanisms for different anomalous zones, and
the interrelations among them, reflect the evolution of seismotectonic stress fields,
which could contain valuable information about the timing of seismic activity.
Over the past 30 years, data have been collected from a number of different scien-
tific disciplines and from several different countries, including China, Japan, the
United States, Greece, Turkey, and Russia.
In China, for example, information on hundreds of large earthquakes is now
available from databases that are part of a substantial observational network. The
accumulated information is used to investigate problems of earthquake prediction,
using statistical analyses and various characteristics of geophysical anomalies at
different preearthquake stages. Some previously successful earthquake predictions
where N is the number of cracks of size L per unit volume, K is the critical
average distance between cracks, measured in units of average crack lengths.
When the average distance between cracks becomes smaller than a certain
critical value, there is an abrupt reorganization of the entire system of cracks,
with an increase in the average crack sizes (in some geometrical proportion)
and a decrease in the average volume concentration. Cracks tend to localize in
1.1.2 Main properties of the integral precursor 5
the area of a future macrofracture. These phenomena are typical for any scale
and any loading regime.
3. Reorganization of the crack system manifests itself as a change to some of the
characteristics of the medium in a developing earthquake source and as
the formation of anomalies in some geophysical fields. In particular,
concentration of the crack-formation process can be evidence of a change in
the seismicity regime for weak earthquakes, and in the appearance of rock
anisotropy in a future earthquake source. The appearance of elastic anisotropy
is most conspicuous in the formation of anomalies prior to large earthquakes
(Nersesov et al., 1971).
Some geophysical fields can be affected by the opening of microcracks. In
particular, gas and fluid permeability increases in those areas of the Earth’s crust
where this process takes place. As a consequence, the groundwater level, the
intensity of gas flow, and the electrical resistance can change. The loosening of
rock resulting from the increase in total crack volume must also cause local grav-
ity anomalies.
Thus the crack-density function as a measure of rock failure has some advan-
tages, because this function is present in the formulation of all three principles.
Another advantage is that the crack-density function can be more accurately and
reliably determined from multidisciplinary data, owing to its presence in the mod-
els of various geophysical fields—the complementary principle (Alekseev, 1992).
An analysis of the preexisting stress fields at earthquake locations (Miao,
1993; Wang and Liao, 1996) and the results from dilatancy-zone numerical
modeling (presented later) suggest that cracks of some scale level can be formed
at distances of 200300 km from the source of a future earthquake.
Although the earthquake development process is “slow,” lasting up to several
hundreds of years, it is an energy-intensive process. Considerable rheological
change in the medium takes place, and anomalous zones form within different
kinds of geophysical fields. Crack openings in zones with increased shearing and
tensile stresses are the most basic mechanism of medium change. Such zones are
formed near the sources of future earthquakes, if the spatial distribution of forces
is nonuniform. Many seismologists consider that the initial stage of crack opening
and the subsequent state of the medium when rock failure develops are connected
to medium dilatancy (Nikolayevskii, 1982; Nur, 1971; Brace et al., 1966).
Dilatancy is the nonlinear loosening of rocks caused by crack formation from
shear. This process takes place when tangential stresses exceed a certain thresh-
old. A dilatancy zone includes points within an elastic medium, for which the fol-
lowing condition is satisfied:
1
P 5 2 ðσ11 1 σ22 1 σ33 Þ; (1.1.3)
3
where σij is the stresses and τ is the intensity of the tangential stresses:
pffiffiffi h
3 1=2
τ5 ðσ11 2σ22 Þ2 1 ðσ22 2σ33 Þ2 1 ðσ33 2σ11 Þ2 1 6ðσ212 1σ213 1σ223 Þ : (1.1.4)
2
Distance (km)
–40 –30 –20 –10 0 10 20 30 40 X
0
Depth (km)
5
10
15
20
FIGURE 1.1.1
Exact solutions for elastic displacements and stresses from a point source satisfying the
conditions of zero stresses at the free surface show that there are two dilatancy zones—
the “source” zone in the vicinity of the elastic dipole application point and the “surface”
zone in the layer near the free surface. Shapes of “source” and “surface” dilatancy
zones in the plane y 5 0 (15 km 5 source depth), double force M0 5 3 3 1020 N;
n 5 ðcos ϕ; 0; sin ϕÞ; p 5 ð0; 1; 0Þ; ϕ 5 30 .
1.1.2 Main properties of the integral precursor 7
Distance (km)
–40 –30 –20 –10 0 10 20 30 40 X
0
Depth (km)
5
10
15
20
FIGURE 1.1.2
As in Fig. 1.1.1 except for the double-force couple
M0 5 6:75 3 1020 N; n\ 5 p; p\ 5 n; n 5 ðcos ϕ; 0; sin ϕÞ; p 5 ð0; 1; 0Þ; ϕ 5 30 .
8 CHAPTER 1.1 Elements of active geophysical monitoring theory
where σ1 and σ3 are the largest and smallest principal stresses, respectively; ϕ is
the angle of internal friction; Y is the cohesion; and σp is the rock strength. This
criterion determines dilatancy zones under conditions in which the medium can
withstand large shearing stresses, but offers less resistance to tensile forces.
Note that, so far, the existence of surface dilatancy zones under real conditions
should be considered a hypothesis. The use of this hypothesis for practical analy-
sis of anomalies within various geophysical fields is an attempt to find reasons
for the evolution of these anomalies, and to clarify the mechanisms of their
interrelation.
Monitoring of the crack-density variation in the source zone is of special
importance for short-range earthquake prediction. This monitoring should not be
separated from observations of the surface dilatancy zone and the anomalous
fields associated with it. First, the location of the future source is not known
exactly, and its determination is closely related to the behavior of surface anoma-
lous zones. Second, the reliability and accuracy of estimating the crack-density
function in the source zone depend on the information regarding field anomalies
in surface zones.
Before proceeding to the scheme for estimating the integral precursor in the
source using multidisciplinary monitoring, it is reasonable to consider the relation-
ship between crack-formation processes in the source and surface dilatancy areas.
Generally, a stress field is an energy-charged medium in which a relationship
exists between the source and surface zones. The lines of largest tangential stress
(or largest tensile stress) provide an estimate for the predominant orientation of
cracks that occur in zones of the source and surface types.
When dilatancy zones of the two types are combined into one zone, there is a
joint area of fracturing. This area combines the surface zones of anomalous fields
with the source zone, in which the development of the rock failure process can
directly influence the change in the geophysical anomalies. When dilatancy areas
are separated, the source zone can retain its direct influence on the anomalies of
some fields (e.g., on the values of the velocities υp and υs) by a joint area of
introduced anisotropy within the medium. The anisotropy coefficients can be
expected to vary in a special way during the crack growth process, because the
1.1.3 Multidisciplinary model of integral precursor and combined 9
orientation of the axis of symmetry remains the same. This can simplify the prob-
lem of estimating the average number of cracks by a high-resolution vibroseismic
method (Alekseev et al., 1998a,b, 1999, 2001).
(loosening) function, θ (x, y, z, t). This function can be considered piecewise con-
tinuous, and it is assumed to be equal to the total relative volume of cracks in the
medium’s unit volume. The number of cracks in the unit volume can be deter-
mined by the formula N 5 θ (x, y, z, t)/θL (x, y, z, t), where θL (x, y, z, t) is the
relative average volume of a crack with length L.
Let us consider a combined inverse problem for gravitational and electric
data, groundwater-level evaluation, and the seismic method for measuring the
effective anisotropy coefficients of cracked rocks, on the basis of the complemen-
tary principle of geophysical methods (Alekseev et al., 1995; Alekseev, 1992)—
to obtain reliable estimates of the function. Each of these methods is based on
measurements at the surface z 5 0 of a corresponding geophysical field
Uv ðx; y; 0; tk Þ 5 Uv0 ðx; y; tk Þ; (1.1.7)
here, tk 5 kTv, with Tv being the time interval between the recording times of field
values during monitoring.
Methods for solving direct and inverse problems exist for all geophysical
fields that are used in the problem of earthquake prediction (Alekseev, 1967;
Alekseev et al., 1971, 1958; Alekseev and Mikhailenko, 1977; Alekseev and
Tsibulchik, 1996; Alterman and Karal, 1968; Babich et al., 1985; Mikhailenko,
1978; Petrashen, 1978). In direct problems, the equations for the field
Lv ðUv ; αv ; βvÞ 5 fv ðx; y; z; tÞ; (1.1.8)
surface conditions
lv ðUv ; αv ; β v Þjs 5 hv ðs; tÞ; (1.1.9)
and the initial data
Uv ðx; y; z; tÞ jt50 5 Uv0 ðx; y; zÞ (1.1.10)
are assumed to be given. Here αv (x, y, z) and β v (x, y, z) are the physical and
geometrical characteristics of the medium; fv (x, y, z, t) is the external volume
sources of the field; and hv (s, t) is the sources at the surface S. The statement of
the combined inverse problem is illustrated by Fig. 1.1.3.
Numerical methods for solving direct problems exist for many of the above-
mentioned fields. These methods use specified geological medium characteristics
αv (x, y, z), β v (x, y, z), the field sources, and the surface S. In inverse problems,
the following information is known: the field Uv0 (si, t) at a series of points si at
the surface S and the sought-for characteristics of the medium αv, β v, or other ele-
ments of the problem (the shape of the surface S, some sources fv or hv).
The model of a multidisciplinary (combined) inverse problem determines the
integral precursor θ (x, y, z, t), that is, the relative crack-density function. In this
case, all geometrical and physical parameters of the medium, with the exception
of the function θ (x, y, z, t), are considered to be known, and the function θ (x, y,
z, t) is considered to be independent of time during each field measurement
tk 5 kTv.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
teacher who feels in her heart a love for every boy and girl, a love that
desires to do the best for them, to build and strengthen their
characters, can not be superficial. It has been said elsewhere, that
whatever increases the confidence of pupils in the teacher lessens the
necessity of outer control, and whatever lessens the confidence
increases the necessity of outer control. This is an important fact and
the teacher cannot too thoroughly study it. It is the teacher who loses
patience with the boy, when he shows the first signs of waywardness,
who fails to attain the ideal in school-room control, who
consequently loses the boy’s confidence, thereby increasing the
difficulty of control. Such a boy, if he is a natural leader, will form a
clique of his own and place himself at its head. He and his clan will
see to it that mischief does not languish in that school. The teacher
wonders why the boy regards her good admonitions so lightly. He
would regard and heed them, if she had not lost his confidence.
What, then, shall the teacher do to regain and keep the faith and
loyalty of every pupil?
No better plan can be given for the primary grades than to tell the
actual experience of one teacher of forty-five boys and girls. Among
these were bad boys, who quarreled, fought, used bad language and
did other things that could not be tolerated in a wellordered school.
One was an only child; she controlled her parents and insisted on
similar privileges in the school-room. By no means were the pupils
well behaved. The teacher studied her problem. In the first week of
school, she bore many annoyances, but she found out who were
leaders and just how annoying the pupils could be, and also what
they were capable of doing. She knew the actual condition of the
room and had laid her plans to win. On the second morning she
entered her room bright and cheery. Before the bell rang she copied a
pleasing and easy little song on the blackboard. As soon as the bell
rang and her pupils were in their seats she told them a very
interesting story, standing as she did so. Her manner was pleasing
and she held the attention of her pupils throughout the story. When
it was finished she turned to the song and said, “Children, let us read
over this song together.” At once she started to read. Many of the
children did not read, but that did not deter her, she read on. When
through, she asked them to read it again with her. This time more
read. At the conclusion, she faced the school and said, “How fine that
was! Do read it again for me!” This time every pupil read because she
had approved their reading and showed pleasure and interest in
what they did. Then she asked them to help her sing. None sang with
her, but that did not daunt her. A second time she sang. A few of the
pupils sang with her, and when through, she exclaimed, “I really did
not know you could sing so well! Why, we must sing often!” She had
won every boy and girl. In fact, they did not know themselves that
they could sing so well. Again they sang. This time every voice
helped. True there were a dozen discords. But what did this teacher
care for discords. They were not evils. It was confidence she was
planting and nurturing. From the song she turned to the work of the
day, but casually she dropped this remark: “I know this will be a
pleasant day. You all look just as though you would do your best.”
Through the day the teacher kept up that spirit of cheerfulness.
She approved and complimented the crude efforts of each one. There
was noise. There were annoyances, but she overlooked them as best
she could. She was working for a larger end. Later, when she found
her plans did not win all of her pupils, she took up each case of the
few remaining wayward ones and disposed of it by individual
treatment.
This teacher planned an autumn outing for her pupils. One bright
afternoon, when the sun silvered the country side, and softened the
red, yellow and golden tints in the forest, she took her flock to the
woods. There were nuts to gather, wild grapes to pick, asters and
goldenrod to gather and garlands of autumn tinted leaves to weave.
Toward evening, she assembled the children about her in a pretty
spot in the woods, and all ate together.
Often she allowed the children to have little play parties at which
she was the leader. She knew no end of “full-of-fun” games; her
pupils never failed to have a good time. She took them out skating.
They had snowballing bouts. Even when she wanted her room
cleaned and redecorated, she invited her pupils to join her in the task
and as they worked away, she wisely directed their efforts.
The teacher who is tactful can think of a hundred and one things to
do to please and win her pupils.
All such affairs must be given to the pupils as expressions of the
teacher’s good will. There must be that attitude toward the pupils
that indicates to them the teacher’s love for them and her interest
and consideration for them. Among such fortunate pupils there will
be no hostile ringleaders. All will readily accede to the teacher’s
wishes, because she lives with them and for them. Such a teacher
keeps her pupils busy with those things that they enjoy doing; they
have no time to think of other things, than what the teacher plans for
them.
The teacher who follows this course will be the “ringleader.” She,
too, will be the one whom the pupils unconsciously will imitate and
follow.
CONSTRUCTIVE TREATMENT
COMMENTS
CONSTRUCTIVE TREATMENT
COMMENTS
Such situations as faced Mr. Frank in the oil town are growing less
common as time passes; in frontier towns they occurred frequently.
Sometimes they occur still; and blessed is that school whose teacher,
in such a crisis, possesses quick wits, a knowledge of psychology, and
dauntless courage.
Mr. Frank did well to check the pupils as he did, when once the
school had reached the state of insubordination indicated in the story
above, but he was very seriously at fault in allowing the school to
reach that stage. His arbitrary handling of the situation undoubtedly
was a victory, but it was the kind of victory which assuredly would
breed contempt and resentment and plotting to “get even” with the
man who had tricked the pupils into an extra half day of study.
In depriving the pupils of what they regarded as a great privilege
he should have had a substitute plan which would have eased
somewhat the disappointment of the pupils. In this plan he should
have retained his rightful place as leader and thus by coöperating
heartily in the pleasure of the pupils, should have fully demonstrated
to them that he desired only their welfare.
So regulating a school as to prevent a crisis is a higher type of
administrative ability than allowing crises to come, and then meeting
them with drastic measures, even though they seemed successful.
Occasionally it happens, even in good schools, that a student
commits an act so serious as to justify his being turned over to the
juvenile or other court. In such a case the principal may sometimes
find it to his advantage to coöperate with the court in trying to
reclaim an unusually bad and daring boy.
CONSTRUCTIVE TREATMENT