Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DIARY OF PED ITERN Izbassar Zh.
DIARY OF PED ITERN Izbassar Zh.
«SDU» University
Faculty of Education & Humanities
Kaskelen, 2024
ДП-SDU-01-Ф25
AFFIRMED
Director of graduate programs_________________
«___» _________________ 2024
2
ДП-SDU-01-Ф25
INTERNSHIP REGULATIONS
3
ДП-SDU-01-Ф25
№ Activities Contents
Attendance at a practical During the meeting, students should obtain
1 training meeting organised information and guidance regarding pedagogical
by the department internship.
Participation in teacher-led classes is required
Engagement in classes To gain the necessary didactic and
2
taught by instructors methodological abilities through the attendance
to the lessons.
Conducting open classes for undergraduate
students who has same major, in consultation
3 Conducting open lessons with their mentor and internship supervisor. If a
student attains all of his/her objectives, he/she
may conduct no more than one open lesson.
At the end of the internship, submit all required
documents to the supervisor in a signed version
The storage of materials
(internship portfolio, open lesson plan, open
4 that are relevant to
lesson record, etc.). Upload to the shared
pedagogical internship
storage folder opened by the internship
supervisor once students go online.
4
ДП-SDU-01-Ф25
WRITTEN LOG
Date A summary of the tasks that has been completed Mentor’s comment
30.01 I participated in the lecture given by Halit
Yilmaz to 2nd year students. Lecture topic
“Concentration concept".
01.02 I participated in the practical lesson conducted by
Gulmira Bekenova for 3rd year students. The
topic of the practical lesson is "Electrochemical
cells". The students defended their work and in
the second lesson with the help of the teacher the
laboratory work was done in the practice class.
06.02 I conducted an open class for 2nd year students.
Open lesson topic "Normality. Molality".
5
ДП-SDU-01-Ф25
confidently and freely, his pedagogical
professional knowledge was visible.
During the lecture, students were very
active and could freely ask questions they
did not understand. The lecture was
summed up by providing feedback on the
knowledge gained by students.
01.02 Instructor: Gulmira Bekenova In the first lesson the 3 rd year students
Topic: "Electrochemical cells" defended their project work about
“galvanic cells” for 20 min. The next
group defended the “Redox” topic for
another 20 minutes. After that the teacher
gives constructive feedback for group
members. In the 2nd lesson the teacher
sends the link to the lab work video. After
watching the video the students retell the
steps of the lab work. And the teacher
demonstrated the lab work to the
students.
I really liked the way that teachers
conducted the lesson. Specially for the
visual learners the video was the best
decision.
When the students observe the instructor's lesson, they must consider the following:
1) the lesson's organization stage;
2) the topic's comprehensive disclosure in the lesson;
3) the instructor's creativity;
4) the lesson's methodological support;
5) the lesson's connection of theory and practice;
6) the instructor's oral language skills;
7) the ability to communicate with the audience and receive feedback;
8) the students’ activity;
9) instructor's competence;
10) the lesson's summary stage.
6
ДП-SDU-01-Ф25
(Objective, theory, method adopted, illustration, and session notes. Each student is
responsible for filling out the outline for the open lesson)
Me and Zhibekaiym conducted the lecture "Normality" to 2nd year students of the
Faculty of Chemistry. We prepared the lecture materials in advance for the lecture. We
made a presentation that consisted of theoretical and practical parts of the topic. We
came to the lecture hall early for the lecture. Before starting the lesson, Mr. Yilmaz
introduced us to the students. Instead of starting with a new topic we asked several
questions to the audience to grab their attention. Students responded very actively.We
also did the review of the previous topic by solving problems. After the little warm up
we jumped to the main topic. As our topic was another unit of concentration that was
easier to explain with the connection of previous. In order to confirm the knowledge, we
prepared example problems for the students. At the end of the lesson, Mr. Halit
explained the topics that were not fully revealed.
7
ДП-SDU-01-Ф25
8
ДП-SDU-01-Ф25
Characteristics to the master student and evaluation of his\her work
(to be completed by the internship supervisor)
During the internship period master student Akbope Aidos proved to be well- attended
in all the arranged lessons. She explained concentration and normality in quantitative
chemistry for a short time period. She clearly presented the relevant theories and their
teaching methods. She included practice problems with guidance to calculate normality
concentrations. The lesson structure was well-organized, with slides followed by hands-
on exercises. While slides were used effectively, incorporating problem solving would
enhance student participation. The large classroom setting and lecture format limited
opportunities for interactive activities. Despite the limitations, the student instructor
delivered a good lesson. The score is to be 95.