Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download textbook Crc Handbook Of Chemistry And Physics 95Th Edition William M Haynes ebook all chapter pdf
Download textbook Crc Handbook Of Chemistry And Physics 95Th Edition William M Haynes ebook all chapter pdf
https://textbookfull.com/product/crc-handbook-of-chemistry-and-
physics-95-ed-haynes-w-m-ed/
https://textbookfull.com/product/crc-handbook-of-chemistry-and-
physics-a-ready-reference-book-of-chemical-and-physical-
data-2012-2013-w-m-haynes-david-r-lide-editors-editor-in-chief-w-
m-haynes/
https://textbookfull.com/product/crc-handbook-of-chemistry-and-
physics-a-ready-reference-book-of-chemical-and-physical-data-
haynes-w-m-ed/
https://textbookfull.com/product/crc-handbook-of-chemistry-and-
physics-96-ed-internet-version-
%d0%bd%d0%b5%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%bd%d1%8b%d0%b9-ch-1-10-96th-
Handbook of Homotopy Theory 1st Edition Haynes Miller
(Editor)
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-homotopy-theory-1st-
edition-haynes-miller-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-homotopy-theory-1st-
edition-haynes-miller-editor-2/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-wood-chemistry-and-
wood-composites-2nd-edition-roger-m-rowell-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/crc-handbook-of-materials-
science-nonmetallic-materials-and-applications-lynch/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-on-the-physics-and-
chemistry-of-rare-earths-volume-45-1st-edition-karl-a-
gschneidner/
95
EDITION
TH
95
EDITION
TH
2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5
2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5
2014-2015
95th
EDITION
Editor-in-Chief
W. M. Haynes, Ph.D.
Scientist Emeritus
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Associate Editors
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and
information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and
publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission
to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any
future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic,
mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact
the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides
licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment
has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation
without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
and the CRC Press Web site at
http://www.crcpress.com
Foreword
My first copy of the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics seen the guy in a semester or more, and it was a heavy book to heft
was a 1973 edition that came into my possession in 1983, when I from one desk to another. If he did come in and was looking for it,
was 21 years old. I’d like to tell you that its 2279 pages launched me he’d see it on my desk, no problem. But before long, some of the
onto a career of successful physics research, but the truth is they graduate students were asking if they could borrow “my” Handbook.
very nearly launched me instead on a career of petty larceny and I was always very willing to loan it out, but I never corrected their
crime in general. impression that the book belonged to me. I knew then, and I know
I was an undergraduate physics major, working in the afternoons now, that this act of omission was very wrong, but it was just so
in a Stanford physics lab. Undergraduate researchers did not have flattering to my ego that the graduate students would ask to borrow
a lot of clout in the department and no one offered me a desk of such an important book from me, a lowly undergraduate.
my own, but my lab key got me into a room full of desks occupied Well by now I was well down the slippery slope. The true owner
by graduate students, and one of them was empty, so I decided to never did show up again. I guess he graduated. But did I make any
brazen it out. I lined up my five or six physics text books along the effort to contact him, to let him know he had forgotten his book?
back of the desk, put several pads of engineer-lined blank paper in I did not. And when I left Palo Alto to go to grad school, I took his
the center drawer, and “moved in.” For a year and more, I did my Rubber Bible with me.
homework at the desk and also did calculations for an experiment In the ensuing 30 years, I’ve owned and made good use of sev-
I was working on. eral generations of updated editions of the CRC Handbook of
Sitting on the adjacent desk was a massive blue book. My slide Chemistry and Physics, but for sentimental reasons, and perhaps
down into criminality began in a simple moment of curiosity one as a moral warning, I’ve always kept also my purloined 1973 edi-
evening when I was bored with my homework. I leaned over onto tion. Just now, I’m opening it. The name of the true owner is writ-
my neighbor’s desk, and flipped his book open: Wow. It turned ten in pen on the inside of the front cover, but it has been lined
out to be choc-a-bloc full of all varieties of useful information, ex- through and just under it, my name is written, and in my own
actly the sort of stuff I needed to design modifications to my ex- hand. I don’t remember doing that, but I can hardly call that a
periment! Another graduate student in the room told me “Oh sure, mere “act of omission,” can I?
we call that the ‘Rubber Bible.’ No one knows why. ” Years later Gentle reader, do not repeat my errors. Go not down the path
someone told me that “CRC” used to stand for the company that I have chosen. Buy this, the 95th Edition of the CRC Handbook of
published it —and the “R” stood for “Rubber.” Thus, its authorita- Chemistry and Physics, for your own!
tive tome was naturally still called the “Rubber Bible,” but at the
time the name seemed to me full of portent and significance. My Eric A. Cornell, Ph.D.
favorite record album was called “Rubber Soul.” What better way JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and
to tend to your rubber soul than flipping through a rubber bible? University of Colorado
Soon I was borrowing my neighbor’s CRC Handbook on a fre- Boulder, Colorado 80309-0440
quent basis. And, since he never seemed to be around, one fateful Nobel Laureate Physics 2001
day instead of returning the book to his desk when I was done, I just http://jila.colorado.edu/bec/CornellGroup/
left it on the edge of my desk. I meant no harm. It’s just that I hadn’t March 2014
The 95th Edition of the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics is dedicated in memory of my wonderful and cherished
daughter, Jennifer “Jen” Lynn Haynes, who has gone to be with her angels and who has inspired many friends and family with
her endless love and respect for all animals and the natural beauty in our environment and has guided and challenged her
many friends and family with her boundless spirit and faith in the magic and wonders of the unknown of the spiritual world.
Section 7: Biochemistry
Properties of Amino Acids................................................................................................................................................................................. 7-1
Structures of Common Amino Acids............................................................................................................................................................... 7-3
Properties of Purine and Pyrimidine Bases ................................................................................................................................................... 7-5
The Genetic Code................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7-6
Properties of Fatty Acids and Their Methyl Esters........................................................................................................................................ 7-7
Properties of Fatty Acid Methyl and Ethyl Esters Related to Biofuels....................................................................................................... 7-9
Composition and Properties of Common Oils And Fats........................................................................................................................... 7-12
Carbohydrate Names and Symbols................................................................................................................................................................. 7-17
Standard Transformed Gibbs Energies of Formation for Biochemical Reactants................................................................................ 7-19
Apparent Equilibrium Constants for Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions....................................................................................................... 7-22
Thermodynamic Quantities for the Ionization Reactions of Buffers in Water..................................................................................... 7-26
Biological Buffers................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7-29
Typical pH Values of Biological Materials and Foods................................................................................................................................. 7-30
Structure and Functions of Some Common Drugs..................................................................................................................................... 7-31
Chemical Constituents of Human Blood...................................................................................................................................................... 7-48
Chemical Composition of the Human Body................................................................................................................................................. 7-51
Nutrient Values of Foods.................................................................................................................................................................................. 7-52
Index..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................I-1
Units
CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
Standard Atomic Weights (2013). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-11
Atomic Masses and Abundances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-13
Electron Configuration and Ionization Energy of Neutral Atoms in the Ground State. . . . . . . . 1-17
International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-19
Conversion of Temperatures from the 1948 and 1968 Scales to ITS-90. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-20
International System of Units (SI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-22
Units for Magnetic Properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-26
Conversion Factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-27
Conversion of Temperatures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-37
Conversion Factors for Energy Units. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-38
Conversion Factors for Pressure Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-39
Conversion Factors for Thermal Conductivity Units. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-40
Conversion Factors for Electrical Resistivity Units. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-41
Conversion Formulas for Concentration of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-42
Conversion Factors for Chemical Kinetics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-43
Conversion Factors for Ionizing Radiation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-44
Values of the Gas Constant in Different Unit Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-46
Units
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8420, USA
This report gives the 2010 self-consistent set of values of the basic constants and conversion factors of physics and
chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) for international use.
The 2010 adjustment takes into account the data considered in the 2006 adjustment as well as the data that became
available from 1 January 2007, after the closing date of that adjustment, until 31 December 2010, the closing date of
the new adjustment. The 2010 set replaces the previously recommended 2006 CODATA set and may also be found
on the World Wide Web at physics.nist.gov/constants.
Reference
1. Nakamura, K., K . Hagiwara, K . Hikasa, H. Murayama, M. Tanabashi, T. Watari, C. Amsler, M. Antonelli, D. M. Asner,
H. Baer, and e. al, 2010, J. Phys. G 37, 075021.
Relative std.
Quantity Symbol Numerical value Unit uncert. ur
speed of light in vacuum c, c0 299 792 458 m s−1 exact
magnetic constant µ0 4π × 10−7 N A−2
= 12.566 370 614... × 10−7 N A−2 exact
electric constant 1/µ0 c2 �0 8.854 187 817... × 10−12 F m−1 exact
Newtonian constant of gravitation G 6.673 84(80) × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2 1.2 × 10−4
Planck constant h 6.626 069 57(29) × 10−34 Js 4.4 × 10−8
h/2π h̄ 1.054 571 726(47) × 10−34 Js 4.4 × 10−8
elementary charge e 1.602 176 565(35) × 10−19 C 2.2 × 10−8
magnetic flux quantum h/2e �0 2.067 833 758(46) × 10−15 Wb 2.2 × 10−8
conductance quantum 2e2/ h G0 7.748 091 7346(25) × 10−5 S 3.2 × 10−10
electron mass me 9.109 382 91(40) × 10−31 kg 4.4 × 10−8
proton mass mp 1.672 621 777(74) × 10−27 kg 4.4 × 10−8
proton-electron mass ratio mp /me 1836.152 672 45(75) 4.1 × 10−10
fine-structure constant e2/4π�0h̄c α 7.297 352 5698(24) × 10−3 3.2 × 10−10
inverse fine-structure constant α −1 137.035 999 074(44) 3.2 × 10−10
Rydberg constant α 2 me c/2h R∞ 10 973 731.568 539(55) m−1 5.0 × 10−12
∗ This report was prepared by the authors under the auspices of the CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants. The members of the task
group are:
F. Cabiati, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Italy
J. Fischer, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany
J. Flowers, National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom
K. Fujii, National Metrology Institute of Japan, Japan
S. G. Karshenboim, Pulkovo Observatory, Russian Federation
P. J. Mohr, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States of America
D. B. Newell, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States of America
F. Nez, Laboratoire Kastler-Brossel, France
K. Pachucki, University of Warsaw, Poland
T. J. Quinn, Bureau international des poids et mesures
B. N. Taylor, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States of America
B. M. Wood, National Research Council, Canada
Z. Zhang, National Institute of Metrology, China (People’s Republic of)
1-1
TABLE I: (Continued.)
Relative std.
Quantity Symbol Numerical value Unit uncert. ur
Units
UNIVERSAL
speed of light in vacuum c, c0 299 792 458 m s−1 exact
magnetic constant µ0 4π × 10−7 N A−2
= 12.566 370 614... × 10−7 N A−2 exact
electric constant 1/µ0 c2 �0 8.854 187 817... × 10−12 F m−1 exact
characteristic impedance of vacuum µ0 c Z0 376.730 313 461... � exact
Newtonian constant of gravitation G 6.673 84(80) × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2 1.2 × 10−4
G/h̄c 6.708 37(80) × 10−39 (GeV/c2 ) −2 1.2 × 10−4
Planck constant h 6.626 069 57(29) × 10−34 Js 4.4 × 10−8
4.135 667 516(91) × 10−15 eV s 2.2 × 10−8
h/2π h̄ 1.054 571 726(47) × 10−34 Js 4.4 × 10−8
6.582 119 28(15) × 10−16 eV s 2.2 × 10−8
h̄c 197.326 9718(44) MeV fm 2.2 × 10−8
Planck mass (h̄c/G) 1/2 mP 2.176 51(13) × 10−8 kg 6.0 × 10−5
energy equivalent mP c2 1.220 932(73) × 1019 GeV 6.0 × 10−5
Planck temperature (h̄c5 /G) 1/2 /k TP 1.416 833(85) × 1032 K 6.0 × 10−5
Planck length h̄/mP c = (h̄G/c3 ) 1/2 lP 1.616 199(97) × 10−35 m 6.0 × 10−5
Planck time lP /c = (h̄G/c5 ) 1/2 tP 5.391 06(32) × 10−44 s 6.0 × 10−5
ELECTROMAGNETIC
elementary charge e 1.602 176 565(35) × 10−19 C 2.2 × 10−8
e/ h 2.417 989 348(53) × 1014 A J−1 2.2 × 10−8
magnetic flux quantum h/2e �0 2.067 833 758(46) × 10−15 Wb 2.2 × 10−8
conductance quantum 2e2/ h G0 7.748 091 7346(25) × 10−5 S 3.2 × 10−10
−1
inverse of conductance quantum G0 12 906.403 7217(42) � 3.2 × 10−10
Josephson constant1 2e/ h KJ 483 597.870(11) × 109 Hz V−1 2.2 × 10−8
von Klitzing constant2 h/e2 = µ0 c/2α RK 25 812.807 4434(84) � 3.2 × 10−10
Bohr magneton eh̄/2me µB 927.400 968(20) × 10−26 J T−1 2.2 × 10−8
5.788 381 8066(38) × 10−5 eV T−1 6.5 × 10−10
µB / h 13.996 245 55(31) × 109 Hz T−1 2.2 × 10−8
µB / hc 46.686 4498(10) m−1 T−1 2.2 × 10−8
µB /k 0.671 713 88(61) K T−1 9.1 × 10−7
nuclear magneton eh̄/2mp µN 5.050 783 53(11) × 10−27 J T−1 2.2 × 10−8
3.152 451 2605(22) × 10−8 eV T−1 7.1 × 10−10
µN / h 7.622 593 57(17) MHz T−1 2.2 × 10−8
µN / hc 2.542 623 527(56) × 10−2 m−1 T−1 2.2 × 10−8
µN /k 3.658 2682(33) × 10−4 K T−1 9.1 × 10−7
1 See Table IV for the conventional value adopted internationally for realizing representations of the volt using the Josephson effect.
2 See Table IV for the conventional value adopted internationally for realizing representations of the ohm using the quantum Hall effect.
Units
ATOMIC AND NUCLEAR
General
fine-structure constant e2/4π�0h̄c α 7.297 352 5698(24) × 10−3 3.2 × 10−10
inverse fine-structure constant α −1 137.035 999 074(44) 3.2 × 10−10
Rydberg constant α 2 me c/2h R∞ 10 973 731.568 539(55) m−1 5.0 × 10−12
R∞ c 3.289 841 960 364(17) × 1015 Hz 5.0 × 10−12
R∞ hc 2.179 872 171(96) × 10−18 J 4.4 × 10−8
13.605 692 53(30) eV 2.2 × 10−8
Bohr radius α/4πR∞ = 4π�0h̄2/me e2 a0 0.529 177 210 92(17) × 10−10 m 3.2 × 10−10
Hartree energy e2/4π�0 a0 = 2R∞ hc = α 2 me c2 Eh 4.359 744 34(19) × 10−18 J 4.4 × 10−8
27.211 385 05(60) eV 2.2 × 10−8
quantum of circulation h/2me 3.636 947 5520(24) × 10−4 m2 s−1 6.5 × 10−10
h/me 7.273 895 1040(47) × 10−4 m2 s−1 6.5 × 10−10
Electroweak
Fermi coupling constant3 GF /(h̄c) 3 1.166 364(5) × 10−5 GeV−2 4.3 × 10−6
weak mixing angle4 θW (on-shell scheme)
sin2 θW = sW
2
≡ 1 − (mW /mZ ) 2 sin2 θW 0.2223(21) 9.5 × 10−3
Electron, e−
electron mass me 9.109 382 91(40) × 10−31 kg 4.4 × 10−8
5.485 799 0946(22) × 10−4 u 4.0 × 10−10
energy equivalent me c2 8.187 105 06(36) × 10−14 J 4.4 × 10−8
0.510 998 928(11) MeV 2.2 × 10−8
electron-muon mass ratio me /mµ 4.836 331 66(12) × 10−3 2.5 × 10−8
electron-tau mass ratio me /mτ 2.875 92(26) × 10−4 9.0 × 10−5
electron-proton mass ratio me /mp 5.446 170 2178(22) × 10−4 4.1 × 10−10
electron-neutron mass ratio me /mn 5.438 673 4461(32) × 10−4 5.8 × 10−10
electron-deuteron mass ratio me /md 2.724 437 1095(11) × 10−4 4.0 × 10−10
electron-triton mass ratio me /mt 1.819 200 0653(17) × 10−4 9.1 × 10−10
electron-helion mass ratio me /mh 1.819 543 0761(17) × 10−4 9.2 × 10−10
electron to alpha particle mass ratio me /mα 1.370 933 555 78(55) × 10−4 4.0 × 10−10
electron charge to mass quotient −e/me −1.758 820 088(39) × 1011 C kg−1 2.2 × 10−8
electron molar mass NA me M(e), Me 5.485 799 0946(22) × 10−7 kg mol−1 4.0 × 10−10
Compton wavelength h/me c λC 2.426 310 2389(16) × 10−12 m 6.5 × 10−10
λC /2π = αa0 = α 2/4πR∞ λC 386.159 268 00(25) × 10−15 m 6.5 × 10−10
classical electron radius α 2 a0 re 2.817 940 3267(27) × 10−15 m 9.7 × 10−10
Thomson cross section (8π/3)re2 σe 0.665 245 8734(13) × 10−28 m2 1.9 × 10−9
electron magnetic moment µe −928.476 430(21) × 10−26 J T−1 2.2 × 10−8
to Bohr magneton ratio µe /µB −1.001 159 652 180 76(27) 2.6 × 10−13
to nuclear magneton ratio µe /µN −1838.281 970 90(75) 4.1 × 10−10
electron magnetic moment
anomaly |µe |/µB − 1 ae 1.159 652 180 76(27) × 10−3 2.3 × 10−10
electron g-factor −2(1 + ae ) ge −2.002 319 304 361 53(53) 2.6 × 10−13
electron-muon magnetic moment ratio µe /µµ 206.766 9896(52) 2.5 × 10−8
electron-proton magnetic moment ratio µe /µp −658.210 6848(54) 8.1 × 10−9
electron to shielded proton magnetic
moment ratio (H2 O, sphere, 25 ◦ C) µe /µ�p −658.227 5971(72) 1.1 × 10−8
electron-neutron magnetic moment ratio µe /µn 960.920 50(23) 2.4 × 10−7
electron-deuteron magnetic moment ratio µe /µd −2143.923 498(18) 8.4 × 10−9
electron to shielded helion magnetic
moment ratio (gas, sphere, 25 ◦ C) µe /µ�h 864.058 257(10) 1.2 × 10−8
3 Value
recommended by the Particle Data Group (Nakamura et al., 2010).
4 Based
on the ratio of the masses of the W and Z bosons mW /mZ recommended by the Particle Data Group (Nakamura et al., 2010). The value
for sin2 θW they recommend, which is based on a particular variant of the modified minimal subtraction ( MS) scheme, is sin2 θ̂W ( MZ ) = 0.231 16(13).
electron gyromagnetic ratio 2|µe |/h̄ γe 1.760 859 708(39) × 1011 s−1 T−1 2.2 × 10−8
γe /2π 28 024.952 66(62) MHz T−1 2.2 × 10−8
Muon, µ−
muon mass mµ 1.883 531 475(96) × 10−28 kg 5.1 × 10−8
0.113 428 9267(29) u 2.5 × 10−8
energy equivalent mµ c2 1.692 833 667(86) × 10−11 J 5.1 × 10−8
105.658 3715(35) MeV 3.4 × 10−8
muon-electron mass ratio mµ /me 206.768 2843(52) 2.5 × 10−8
muon-tau mass ratio mµ /mτ 5.946 49(54) × 10−2 9.0 × 10−5
muon-proton mass ratio mµ /mp 0.112 609 5272(28) 2.5 × 10−8
muon-neutron mass ratio mµ /mn 0.112 454 5177(28) 2.5 × 10−8
muon molar mass NA mµ M(µ), Mµ 0.113 428 9267(29) × 10−3 kg mol−1 2.5 × 10−8
muon Compton wavelength h/mµ c λC, µ 11.734 441 03(30) × 10−15 m 2.5 × 10−8
λC, µ /2π λC, µ 1.867 594 294(47) × 10−15 m 2.5 × 10−8
muon magnetic moment µµ −4.490 448 07(15) × 10−26 J T−1 3.4 × 10−8
to Bohr magneton ratio µµ /µB −4.841 970 44(12) × 10−3 2.5 × 10−8
to nuclear magneton ratio µµ /µN −8.890 596 97(22) 2.5 × 10−8
muon magnetic moment anomaly
|µµ |/(eh̄/2mµ ) − 1 aµ 1.165 920 91(63) × 10−3 5.4 × 10−7
muon g-factor −2(1 + aµ ) gµ −2.002 331 8418(13) 6.3 × 10−10
muon-proton magnetic moment ratio µµ /µp −3.183 345 107(84) 2.6 × 10−8
Tau, τ−
5
tau mass mτ 3.167 47(29) × 10−27 kg 9.0 × 10−5
1.907 49(17) u 9.0 × 10−5
energy equivalent mτ c2 2.846 78(26) × 10−10 J 9.0 × 10−5
1776.82(16) MeV 9.0 × 10−5
tau-electron mass ratio mτ /me 3477.15(31) 9.0 × 10−5
tau-muon mass ratio mτ /mµ 16.8167(15) 9.0 × 10−5
tau-proton mass ratio mτ /mp 1.893 72(17) 9.0 × 10−5
tau-neutron mass ratio mτ /mn 1.891 11(17) 9.0 × 10−5
tau molar mass NA mτ M(τ), Mτ 1.907 49(17) × 10−3 kg mol−1 9.0 × 10−5
tau Compton wavelength h/mτ c λC, τ 0.697 787(63) × 10−15 m 9.0 × 10−5
λC, τ /2π λC, τ 0.111 056(10) × 10−15 m 9.0 × 10−5
Proton, p
proton mass mp 1.672 621 777(74) × 10−27 kg 4.4 × 10−8
1.007 276 466 812(90) u 8.9 × 10−11
energy equivalent mp c2 1.503 277 484(66) × 10−10 J 4.4 × 10−8
938.272 046(21) MeV 2.2 × 10−8
proton-electron mass ratio mp /me 1836.152 672 45(75) 4.1 × 10−10
proton-muon mass ratio mp /mµ 8.880 243 31(22) 2.5 × 10−8
proton-tau mass ratio mp /mτ 0.528 063(48) 9.0 × 10−5
proton-neutron mass ratio mp /mn 0.998 623 478 26(45) 4.5 × 10−10
proton charge to mass quotient e/mp 9.578 833 58(21) × 107 C kg−1 2.2 × 10−8
proton molar mass NA mp M(p), Mp 1.007 276 466 812(90) × 10−3 kg mol−1 8.9 × 10−11
proton Compton wavelength h/mp c λC,p 1.321 409 856 23(94) × 10−15 m 7.1 × 10−10
λC,p /2π λC,p 0.210 308 910 47(15) × 10−15 m 7.1 × 10−10
proton rms charge radius rp 0.8775(51) × 10−15 m 5.9 × 10−3
proton magnetic moment µp 1.410 606 743(33) × 10−26 J T−1 2.4 × 10−8
to Bohr magneton ratio µp /µB 1.521 032 210(12) × 10−3 8.1 × 10−9
to nuclear magneton ratio µp /µN 2.792 847 356(23) 8.2 × 10−9
proton g-factor 2µp /µN gp 5.585 694 713(46) 8.2 × 10−9
5 This and all other values involving m are based on the value of m c2 in MeV recommended by the Particle Data Group (Nakamura et al.,
τ τ
2010).
Units
proton-neutron magnetic moment ratio µp /µn −1.459 898 06(34) 2.4 × 10−7
shielded proton magnetic moment µ�p 1.410 570 499(35) × 10−26 JT −1
2.5 × 10−8
(H2 O, sphere, 25 ◦ C)
to Bohr magneton ratio µ�p /µB 1.520 993 128(17) × 10−3 1.1 × 10−8
to nuclear magneton ratio µ�p /µN 2.792 775 598(30) 1.1 × 10−8
proton magnetic shielding correction
1 − µ�p /µp (H2 O, sphere, 25 ◦ C) σp� 25.694(14) × 10−6 5.3 × 10−4
proton gyromagnetic ratio 2µp /h̄ γp 2.675 222 005(63) × 108 s−1 T−1 2.4 × 10−8
γp /2π 42.577 4806(10) MHz T−1 2.4 × 10−8
shielded proton gyromagnetic ratio
2µ�p /h̄ (H2 O, sphere, 25 ◦ C) γp� 2.675 153 268(66) × 108 s−1 T−1 2.5 × 10−8
γp� /2π 42.576 3866(10) MHz T−1 2.5 × 10−8
Neutron, n
neutron mass mn 1.674 927 351(74) × 10−27 kg 4.4 × 10−8
1.008 664 916 00(43) u 4.2 × 10−10
energy equivalent mn c2 1.505 349 631(66) × 10−10 J 4.4 × 10−8
939.565 379(21) MeV 2.2 × 10−8
neutron-electron mass ratio mn /me 1838.683 6605(11) 5.8 × 10−10
neutron-muon mass ratio mn /mµ 8.892 484 00(22) 2.5 × 10−8
neutron-tau mass ratio mn /mτ 0.528 790(48) 9.0 × 10−5
neutron-proton mass ratio mn /mp 1.001 378 419 17(45) 4.5 × 10−10
neutron-proton mass difference mn − mp 2.305 573 92(76) × 10−30 kg 3.3 × 10−7
0.001 388 449 19(45) u 3.3 × 10−7
energy equivalent (mn − mp )c2 2.072 146 50(68) × 10−13 J 3.3 × 10−7
1.293 332 17(42) MeV 3.3 × 10−7
neutron molar mass NA mn M(n), Mn 1.008 664 916 00(43) × 10−3 kg mol−1 4.2 × 10−10
neutron Compton wavelength h/mn c λC,n 1.319 590 9068(11) × 10−15 m 8.2 × 10−10
λC,n /2π λC,n 0.210 019 415 68(17) × 10−15 m 8.2 × 10−10
neutron magnetic moment µn −0.966 236 47(23) × 10−26 J T−1 2.4 × 10−7
to Bohr magneton ratio µn /µB −1.041 875 63(25) × 10−3 2.4 × 10−7
to nuclear magneton ratio µn /µN −1.913 042 72(45) 2.4 × 10−7
neutron g-factor 2µn /µN gn −3.826 085 45(90) 2.4 × 10−7
neutron-electron magnetic moment ratio µn /µe 1.040 668 82(25) × 10−3 2.4 × 10−7
neutron-proton magnetic moment ratio µn /µp −0.684 979 34(16) 2.4 × 10−7
neutron to shielded proton magnetic
moment ratio (H2 O, sphere, 25 ◦ C) µn /µ�p −0.684 996 94(16) 2.4 × 10−7
neutron gyromagnetic ratio 2|µn |/h̄ γn 1.832 471 79(43) × 108 s T
−1 −1
2.4 × 10−7
γn /2π 29.164 6943(69) MHz T−1 2.4 × 10−7
Deuteron, d
deuteron mass md 3.343 583 48(15) × 10−27 kg 4.4 × 10−8
2.013 553 212 712(77) u 3.8 × 10−11
energy equivalent md c2 3.005 062 97(13) × 10−10 J 4.4 × 10−8
1875.612 859(41) MeV 2.2 × 10−8
deuteron-electron mass ratio md /me 3670.482 9652(15) 4.0 × 10−10
deuteron-proton mass ratio md /mp 1.999 007 500 97(18) 9.2 × 10−11
deuteron molar mass NA md M(d), Md 2.013 553 212 712(77) × 10−3 kg mol−1 3.8 × 10−11
deuteron rms charge radius rd 2.1424(21) × 10−15 m 9.8 × 10−4
deuteron magnetic moment µd 0.433 073 489(10) × 10−26 J T−1 2.4 × 10−8
to Bohr magneton ratio µd /µB 0.466 975 4556(39) × 10−3 8.4 × 10−9
to nuclear magneton ratio µd /µN 0.857 438 2308(72) 8.4 × 10−9
deuteron g-factor µd /µN gd 0.857 438 2308(72) 8.4 × 10−9
deuteron-electron magnetic moment ratio µd /µe −4.664 345 537(39) × 10−4 8.4 × 10−9
deuteron-proton magnetic moment ratio µd /µp 0.307 012 2070(24) 7.7 × 10−9
deuteron-neutron magnetic moment ratio µd /µn −0.448 206 52(11) 2.4 × 10−7
Triton, t
triton mass mt 5.007 356 30(22) × 10−27 kg 4.4 × 10−8
3.015 500 7134(25) u 8.2 × 10−10
energy equivalent mt c2 4.500 387 41(20) × 10−10 J 4.4 × 10−8
2808.921 005(62) MeV 2.2 × 10−8
triton-electron mass ratio mt /me 5496.921 5267(50) 9.1 × 10−10
triton-proton mass ratio mt /mp 2.993 717 0308(25) 8.2 × 10−10
triton molar mass NA mt M(t), Mt 3.015 500 7134(25) × 10−3 kg mol−1 8.2 × 10−10
triton magnetic moment µt 1.504 609 447(38) × 10−26 J T−1 2.6 × 10−8
to Bohr magneton ratio µt /µB 1.622 393 657(21) × 10−3 1.3 × 10−8
to nuclear magneton ratio µt /µN 2.978 962 448(38) 1.3 × 10−8
triton g-factor 2µt /µN gt 5.957 924 896(76) 1.3 × 10−8
Helion, h
helion mass mh 5.006 412 34(22) × 10−27 kg 4.4 × 10−8
3.014 932 2468(25) u 8.3 × 10−10
energy equivalent mh c2 4.499 539 02(20) × 10−10 J 4.4 × 10−8
2808.391 482(62) MeV 2.2 × 10−8
helion-electron mass ratio mh /me 5495.885 2754(50) 9.2 × 10−10
helion-proton mass ratio mh /mp 2.993 152 6707(25) 8.2 × 10−10
helion molar mass NA mh M(h), Mh 3.014 932 2468(25) × 10−3 kg mol−1 8.3 × 10−10
helion magnetic moment µh −1.074 617 486(27) × 10−26 J T−1 2.5 × 10−8
to Bohr magneton ratio µh /µB −1.158 740 958(14) × 10−3 1.2 × 10−8
to nuclear magneton ratio µh /µN −2.127 625 306(25) 1.2 × 10−8
helion g-factor 2µh /µN gh −4.255 250 613(50) 1.2 × 10−8
shielded helion magnetic moment µ�h −1.074 553 044(27) × 10−26 J T−1 2.5 × 10−8
(gas, sphere, 25 ◦ C)
to Bohr magneton ratio µ�h /µB −1.158 671 471(14) × 10−3 1.2 × 10−8
to nuclear magneton ratio µ�h /µN −2.127 497 718(25) 1.2 × 10−8
shielded helion to proton magnetic
moment ratio (gas, sphere, 25 ◦ C) µ�h /µp −0.761 766 558(11) 1.4 × 10−8
shielded helion to shielded proton magnetic
moment ratio (gas/H2 O, spheres, 25 ◦ C) µ�h /µ�p −0.761 786 1313(33) 4.3 × 10−9
shielded helion gyromagnetic ratio
2|µ�h |/h̄ (gas, sphere, 25 ◦ C) γh� 2.037 894 659(51) × 108 s−1 T−1 2.5 × 10−8
γh� /2π 32.434 100 84(81) MHz T−1 2.5 × 10−8
Alpha particle, α
alpha particle mass mα 6.644 656 75(29) × 10−27 kg 4.4 × 10−8
4.001 506 179 125(62) u 1.5 × 10−11
energy equivalent mα c2 5.971 919 67(26) × 10−10 J 4.4 × 10−8
3727.379 240(82) MeV 2.2 × 10−8
alpha particle to electron mass ratio mα /me 7294.299 5361(29) 4.0 × 10−10
alpha particle to proton mass ratio mα /mp 3.972 599 689 33(36) 9.0 × 10−11
alpha particle molar mass NA mα M(α), Mα 4.001 506 179 125(62) × 10−3 kg mol−1 1.5 × 10−11
PHYSICOCHEMICAL
Avogadro constant NA , L 6.022 141 29(27) × 1023 mol−1 4.4 × 10−8
atomic mass constant
1
mu = 12 m( 12 C) = 1 u mu 1.660 538 921(73) × 10−27 kg 4.4 × 10−8
energy equivalent mu c2 1.492 417 954(66) × 10−10 J 4.4 × 10−8
931.494 061(21) MeV 2.2 × 10−8
Faraday constant6 NA e F 96 485.3365(21) C mol−1 2.2 × 10−8
6 The numerical value of F to be used in coulometric chemical measurements is 96 485.3321(43) [4.4 × 10−8 ] when the relevant current
is measured in terms of representations of the volt and ohm based on the Josephson and quantum Hall effects and the internationally adopted
conventional values of the Josephson and von Klitzing constants KJ−90 and RK−90 given in Table IV.
Units
molar Planck constant NA h 3.990 312 7176(28) × 10−10 J s mol−1 7.0 × 10−10
NA hc 0.119 626 565 779(84) J m mol−1 7.0 × 10−10
molar gas constant R 8.314 4621(75) J mol−1 K−1 9.1 × 10−7
Boltzmann constant R/NA k 1.380 6488(13) × 10−23 J K−1 9.1 × 10−7
8.617 3324(78) × 10−5 eV K−1 9.1 × 10−7
k/ h 2.083 6618(19) × 1010 Hz K−1 9.1 × 10−7
k/ hc 69.503 476(63) m−1 K−1 9.1 × 10−7
molar volume of ideal gas RT/ p
T = 273.15 K, p = 100 kPa Vm 22.710 953(21) × 10−3 m3 mol−1 9.1 × 10−7
Loschmidt constant NA /Vm n0 2.651 6462(24) × 1025 m−3 9.1 × 10−7
molar volume of ideal gas RT/ p
T = 273.15 K, p = 101.325 kPa Vm 22.413 968(20) × 10−3 m3 mol−1 9.1 × 10−7
Loschmidt constant NA /Vm n0 2.686 7805(24) × 1025 m−3 9.1 × 10−7
Sackur-Tetrode (absolute entropy) constant7
5
2
+ ln[(2πmu kT1 / h2 ) 3/2 kT1 / p0 ]
T1 = 1 K, p0 = 100 kPa S0 /R −1.151 7078(23) 2.0 × 10−6
T1 = 1 K, p0 = 101.325 kPa −1.164 8708(23) 1.9 × 10−6
Stefan-Boltzmann constant
(π2 /60)k4/h̄3 c2 σ 5.670 373(21) × 10−8 W m−2 K−4 3.6 × 10−6
first radiation constant 2πhc2 c1 3.741 771 53(17) × 10−16 W m2 4.4 × 10−8
2
first radiation constant for spectral radiance 2hc c1L 1.191 042 869(53) × 10−16 W m2 sr−1 4.4 × 10−8
second radiation constant hc/k c2 1.438 7770(13) × 10−2 mK 9.1 × 10−7
Wien displacement law constants
b = λmax T = c2 /4.965 114 231... b 2.897 7721(26) × 10−3 mK 9.1 × 10−7
b� = νmax /T = 2.821 439 372... c/c2 b� 5.878 9254(53) × 1010 Hz K−1 9.1 × 10−7
TABLE III: The variances, covariances, and correlation coefficients of the values of a selected group of constants based on the
2010 CODATA adjustment. The numbers in bold above the main diagonal are 1016 times the numerical values of the relative
covariances; the numbers in bold on the main diagonal are 1016 times the numerical values of the relative variances; and the
numbers in italics below the main diagonal are the correlation coefficients.1
α h e me NA me /mµ F
α 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 −0.0011 0.0009 −0.0021 0.0019
h 0 .0072 19.4939 9.7475 19.4918 −19.4912 −0.0020 −9.7437
e 0 .0145 1 .0000 4.8742 9.7454 −9.7452 −0.0020 −4.8709
me −0 .0075 0 .9999 0 .9998 19.4940 −19.4929 0.0021 −9.7475
NA 0 .0060 −0 .9999 −0 .9997 −1 .0000 19.4934 −0.0017 9.7483
me /mµ −0 .0251 −0 .0002 −0 .0004 0 .0002 −0 .0002 6.3872 −0.0037
F 0 .0265 −0 .9993 −0 .9990 −0 .9997 0 .9997 −0 .0007 4.8774
1
The relative covariance is ur (xi , xj ) = u(xi , xj )/(xi xj ), where u(xi , xj ) is the covariance of xi and xj ; the relative variance is
u2r (xi ) = ur (xi , xi ): and the correlation coefficient is r (xi , xj ) = u(xi , xj )/[u(xi )u(xj )].
7 The 3 5
entropy of an ideal monoatomic gas of relative atomic mass Ar is given by S = S0 + 2 R ln Ar − R ln( p/ p0 ) + 2 R ln(T/K).
Language: English
“Think of it! A twist of a switch and the living, breathing piglet slowly
dissolved before my eyes and vanished along a pair of wires to my
aerial, whence it was transferred as a set of waves in the ether to the
receiving apparatus—there to reincarnate into the living organism
once more, alive and breathing, unharmed by its extraordinary
journey!”
RADIO MATES
by Benjamin Witwer
From the telegraph to the telephone was but a step. From the telephone to
radio constituted but another such step, and we are now enjoying radio
broadcast from stations thousands of miles away. Every time you have an
X-ray photograph taken you are bombarded, not by rays, but by actual
particles that go right through the walls of the tube, which particles are just
as real as if they were bullets or bricks, the only difference being that they
are smaller. Thus our scientists lead up to the way of sending solids
through space. While impossible of achievement, as yet, it may be
possible, years hence, to send living beings through space, to be received
at distant points. At any rate, the author of this story weaves a fascinating
romance around this idea. It makes excellent reading, and the plot is as
unusual as is its entire treatment.
54 Westervelt Ave.,
Eastport, New York,
February 15th.
Dear Cousin George:
Now that you have identified me by referring to my signature on
the last page (which I had just done) you will no doubt wonder at the
occasion for this rather effusive letter from one so long silent as I
have been. The fact of the matter is that you are the only male
relative with whom I can communicate at this time. My nephew,
Ralph, is first officer of a freighter somewhere in the Caribbean, and
Alfred Hutton, your mother’s first cousin, has not been heard from
since he embarked on that colonizing scheme in New Guinea, nearly
a year ago.
I must do all in my power to prevent the bungling metropolitan
police from implicating Howard Marsden in my disappearance. It
would take no great stretch of the imagination to do just that, and
were the State to require Marsden’s life as forfeit for my own, then
my carefully planned revenge would be utterly frustrated. I have
been cultivating the village postmaster for some weeks, ever since
this plan began to shape definitely in my mind. I am mailing this letter
at three o’clock this afternoon, for I have noticed that at that hour the
postal section of the store is generally deserted. I shall ask him if his
clock is correct, thus fixing the time in his mind. Please remember
these points. Then I shall register this letter, taking care to exhibit the
unusual collection of seals on the back. I shall manage to inform him
also that I stamped the seals with my ring and will show him the
coat-of-arms, explaining its meaning in detail. These villagers are a
curiosity-ridden lot. Upon returning home, I shall drop this same ring
into the inkwell which stands upon my desk. Finally I shall proffer my
friend the postmaster a fifty-dollar bill in paying for my registry. The
registry slip itself will be found within the hatband of my brown hat,
which I shall place in the wall safe of my study.
You are becoming more amazed as you proceed, no doubt asking
yourself if this letter is the product of a madman or a faker. Before
you have finished you will probably be assured that both
assumptions are correct. It matters little, for I will at least have firmly
established the fact that this letter was mailed by no one else but
me. As for the rest, Howard Marsden will corroborate what follows.
To begin at the beginning. As you know, or perhaps you do not
know, for I forget that our correspondence has been negligible of
late, five years ago I accompanied the Rodgers expedition into
Afghanistan. We were officially booked as a geological mission, but
were actually in search of radium, among other things. When I left, I
was practically engaged to Venice Potter, a distant relation of the
Long Island Potters, of whom you have perhaps heard. I say
“practically” engaged because the outcome of this expedition was to
furnish me with the standing and position necessary for a formal
demand for her hand. As I said, that was nearly five years ago.
Four months after my departure her letters ceased coming and
mine were returned to me unopened. Two months later I received an
announcement of her betrothal to Howard Marsden. Received it out
there in Afghanistan, when I had returned to the coast for supplies.
We’ll skip that next year, during which I stuck with the expedition. We
were successful. I returned.
Then I found out where the Marsdens were living, here in
Eastport. I’d met Marsden once or twice in the old days, but paid him
little attention at the time. He seemed but another of the moneyed
idlers; had a comfortable income from his father’s estate and was
interested in “gentleman farming,”—blooded stock and the rest. I
decided that it was useless to dig into dead ashes for the time being,
at least until I could determine the lay of the land, so to speak.
Meanwhile I had my researches to make, a theory I had evolved as a
sort of backfire to fill that awful void of Venice’s loss,—out there on
the edge of the world. Countless sleepless nights I had spent in a
feverish attempt to lose myself in scientific speculation. At last I
believed I had struck a clue to conclusions until now entirely
overlooked by eager searchers. I decided to establish my laboratory
here in Eastport, perhaps devoting any leisure hours to an
unravelling of that mystery of my sudden jilting. With a two-year-old
beard and sunbaked complexion there were few who would have
recognized me under my real name, and none in my assumed role of
“Professor Walters.”
Thus it was that I leased an old house not half a mile from Marsden’s
pretentious “farm.” I converted the entire ground floor into a
laboratory, living in solitary state upon the upper floor. I was used to
caring for myself, and the nature of my experiment being of such
potentialities, I felt that I wanted no prying servants about me.
Indeed, it has turned out to be of such international importance that I
feel no compunction whatever in utilizing it for my own selfish ends.
It could be a boon to humanity, yet its possibilities for evil in the
hands of any individual or group is so great as to render it most
dangerous to the happiness of the human kind on this small globe.
One day, some three months after I had taken up my residence in
Eastport, I had a visitor. It was Marsden. He had been attracted by
the sight of my novel aerial, just completed. By his own admission he
was an ardent “radio fan,” as they are popularly termed, I believe,
and he spent the better part of an afternoon bragging of stations he
had “logged” with his latest model radio set. Aside from my vague
suspicions of his complicity in the alienation of my beloved Venice, I
must admit that even then I felt an indefinable repulsion towards him.
There was something intangibly unwholesome about him, a
narrowness between the eyes which repelled me. Yet, although at
that time I had no plan in mind, nevertheless I encouraged him in my
most hospitable manner, for even thus early I felt, that at some time
not far distant, I might be called upon to utilize this acquaintanceship
to my own advantage.
This first visit was followed by others, and we discussed radio in
all its phases, for the man had more than a smattering of technical
knowledge on the subject and was eager to learn more. At last, one
day, I yielded to his insistence that I inspect his set and agreed to
dine at his house the following evening. By now I felt secure in my
disguise, and although I dreaded the moment when I should actually
confront my lost love once more, yet I longed for the sweet pain of it
with an intensity which a hard-shelled bachelor like you will never
understand. Enough. I arrived at the Marsden’s the next evening and
was duly presented to my hostess as “Thomas Walters.” In spite of
my private rehearsals I felt a wave of giddiness sweep over me as I
clasped that small white hand in my own after the lapse of almost
five years, for she was, if possible, lovelier than ever. I noted when
my vision cleared that her eyes had widened as they met mine. I
realized that my perturbation had been more apparent than I
imagined and managed to mutter something about my alleged “weak
heart,” a grimmer jest by far than I intended. Frantically I fortified
myself with remembrances of those barren days in Afghanistan,
where I stayed on and on, impotent to raise a hand in the salvage of
my heart’s wreckage.
We chatted politely all through that interminable meal, no morsel
of which aroused the faintest appreciation on my dry tongue. Finally
the chairs were pushed back and my host excused himself to bring
down some pieces of apparatus he had recently purchased,
concerning which he professed to desire my invaluable opinion.
No sooner had he left the room than the polite smile dropped from
Venice’s face like a discarded mask.
“Dick,” she cried, “what are you doing here?”
It was my first inkling that she suspected my true identity. I rallied
quickly, however, and allowed my self-encouraged bitterness its
outlet.
“Had I believed you would recognize me, Mrs. Marsden, I should
not have inflicted my unwelcome presence upon you, I can assure
you.”
She bit her lips and her head raised with a jerk. Then her mouth
softened again as her great eyes searched mine.
“Yes, but why—” she broke off at the sound of approaching
footsteps. Suddenly she leaned forward. “Meet me in the pine grove
to-morrow afternoon—four o’clock,” she breathed. Then her husband
entered.
The remainder of the evening I was forced to listen to Marsden’s
eager dissertation on the alleged “static eliminator” which had been
foisted upon him on his last trip to the city. Mechanically I answered
or grunted in simulated appreciation when a pause in his endless
monologue warned me that some reply was expected of me; but my
pulses were leaping in exultation because of the fleeting hope which
those few words from my lost Venice had kindled. I could not
imagine why the offer to bridge the breach of years should come
from her so voluntarily, yet it was enough for me that she
remembered and wished to see me. I cared not why.
I arrived nearly an hour early that next afternoon, for I had been
unable either to sleep or work during the interim. I shall not bore you
with the particulars of that meeting, even were I free to reveal such
sacred details. Suffice to say that after the preliminaries of doubt and
misunderstanding had been brushed away—and it was not the
simple process this synopsis would seem to infer, I can assure you—
I stood revealed as the victim of a most ingenious and thoroughly
knavish plot. Boiled down, it resembles one of those early movie
scenarios.
You remember I spoke of Venice as related to the Long Island
Potters, a branch of the family highly rated in the Social Register?
You will also remember that before I undertook that expedition I was
never particularly certain whence my next year’s expenses were to
be derived, nor to what extent, if you understand what I mean. At
about the time I was preparing for this expedition which I hoped
would make me financially and scientifically independent, this
wealthy branch of the family seriously “took up” my darling Venice,
inviting her to live with them that summer. I remember now all too
late, that even during that confusion of mind caused by the agony of
leaving my loved one, coupled with the feverish preparations for
departure, chill clouds of censure came from the aloof Potters. They
made no effort to mask their disapproval of my humble self and
prospects, yet in my blindness I had never connected them
intimately with what followed.
It was, in short, the old story of the ingenious man-on-the-ground,
the “good match,” aided and abetted by the patronesses of the “poor
relation.” The discriminating Marsden naturally fell in love with
Venice, and to his great surprise and chagrin, was decisively
repulsed by her. Never before having been refused anything he
really wanted in his comfortably arranged life, he became
passionately desirous of possessing her. Accordingly, my darling
was shown a letter, forged with such diabolical cleverness as to be
almost indistinguishable from my own hand. It purported to intrigue
me with a very ordinary female at a period coincident with the time I
had been so fervently courting my dear one.
She refused to credit the document and dispatched me a
voluminous explanation of the whole occurrence. Attributing my
silence to the exigencies of distance, she continued to write me for
over a month. When no answer arrived after nearly three long
months, she at length delivered a hastily planned ultimatum, to which
she was later persuaded to adhere through the combined pressure
of Marsden and her family, beating against the razed defences of her
broken heart. Then it was that I received the betrothal
announcement, the only communication her watchful family had
permitted to escape their net of espionage.
All was set for the final act. I literally hurled myself into the
completion of my improved set. The large quantities of certain
minerals required caused me an unexpected delay. This I filled with
demonstrations in the presence of Marsden, whom I was
encouraging as a fellow radio enthusiast,—with considerable
unexpected histrionic ability on my part. It was so hard to keep my
fingers off his throat! I pretended to explain to him the important
factors of my great secret, and drilled him in the mechanical
operation of the sets. I had divulged to him also that my greatest
desire was to demonstrate my principle on a human being, and like
all great scientific explorers, proposed to offer myself as the subject.
Venice had strenuously opposed the proposal until the
demonstration on the diseased cat, and even now viewed the entire
proposition with alarm. Yet I insisted that unless applied to human
beings my entire work went for naught, and I finally succeeded in
quieting her fears to a great extent.
At last I am ready. I have told my darling how it is impossible to
transmit anything metallic by the very nature of the conflicting rays
encountered. I have bemoaned the fact that, due to the softness of
my teeth since boyhood, my mouth is one mass of metallic fillings
and crowns, rendering it impossible for me to test the efficiency of
my life’s work. As I had hoped, she has volunteered herself as the
subject for the great experiment, for her white teeth are as yet
innocent of fillings. I have demurred and refused to listen to the idea,
permitting myself to be won over only after days of earnest argument
on her part. We are not to tell Marsden, for there is no doubt that his
fanatical love for her would refuse to tolerate the mere suggestion.
Tonight it shall be accomplished. There is no other way, for that
accursed husband of hers seems to progress in neither direction. He
will be nothing but a mud-buried anchor until the end of her days,
while I—I love her. What other excuse need be offered?
But to the facts. At eight o’clock that drug-soaked love pirate
comes to officiate at my transmission through space. I shall meet
him with a chloroformed soaked rag. Later he will awake to find
himself effectively gagged, with his hands and feet firmly shackled to
the wall of a dark corner of my laboratory. These shackles consist of
armatures across the poles of large electro-magnets which I have
embedded in the walls. At 10:30, a time switch will cut off the
current, releasing the wretch, for, above all things, he must live. I
debated sending a message for his chauffeur to call for him here at
the designated hour. I have decided rather to trust to mechanical
certitude than lay my plan open to frustration because of some
human vagary.
At nine o’clock Venice comes for the great experiment. Marsden
has told her that he will remain in the city over night, at my
suggestion, so that in case I fail to materialize after being “sent” he
cannot be held in connection with my disappearance. She does not
know that I have had my teeth extracted and have been using India
rubber plates for nearly a month. By the time she has arrived, the
effects of the chloroform will have entirely worn off from my would-be
assistant, and I shall have had plenty of time to introduce myself
properly to him and explain the evening’s program which has been
so carefully arranged for his benefit.
Then he will have the excruciating pleasure of watching his
beloved wife dissolve into—nothingness! Soon thereafter he will
witness the same process repeated upon myself, for I have so
adapted the apparatus that I need no outside assistance other than a
time-clock to actuate the mechanism! Then, at the appointed hour,
the current will be shut off and the frenzied wretch will rush to the
distant switch controlling the receiving apparatus. As he throws the
metal bars into their split receptacles there will come a blinding flash,
and behold—the apparatus will have disappeared in a puff of
crystalline particles! The secret has returned whence it came!
Then will come that personally prepared hell for my mean spirited
forger. As I told you, he believes that he is in possession of enough
of the details of my secret to reconstruct the apparatus and duplicate
my success. The added details of this letter will assure him into an
idiotic confidence which will lead him on and on through partially
successful attempts. I know that no matter whether you sympathize
with my actions or not (and I am sure that you do not, for you never
have), your sense of justice will force you to show this letter to the
proper authorities in order to prevent a fatal bungling.
Meanwhile that miserable sneak will be frenzied with the
knowledge that at last, the lover he so long cheated of his loved one
is now with her, alone,—where he, her lawful husband, can never
follow. And we shall be together, unchanged, awaiting the day when
some other enlightened mortal solves Nature’s riddle, when we shall
once more assume our earthly forms, unhindered by other selfish
manbeasts.
Farewell,
Bromley Cranston.
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.