Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Discrete Problems in Nature Inspired Algorithms First Edition Shukla Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Discrete Problems in Nature Inspired Algorithms First Edition Shukla Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/discrete-problems-in-nature-
inspired-algorithms-1st-edition-anupam-prof-shukla/
https://textbookfull.com/product/bio-inspired-algorithms-in-pid-
controller-optimization-first-edition-ashour/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nature-inspired-algorithms-and-
applied-optimization-1st-edition-xin-she-yang-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nature-inspired-computation-and-
swarm-intelligence-algorithms-theory-and-applications-1st-
edition-xin-she-yang-editor/
Nature Inspired Computation in Engineering 1st Edition
Xin-She Yang (Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/nature-inspired-computation-in-
engineering-1st-edition-xin-she-yang-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nature-inspired-design-of-
hybrid-intelligent-systems-1st-edition-patricia-melin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nature-inspired-optimization-
techniques-for-image-processing-applications-jude-hemanth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nature-inspired-optimizers-
theories-literature-reviews-and-applications-seyedali-mirjalili/
Anupam Shukla
Ritu Tiwari
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to
publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or
the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced
in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright
material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any
form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and
recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.
copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400.
CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been
granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
Foreword I ......................................................................................................................................xv
Foreword II.................................................................................................................................. xvii
Foreword III ..................................................................................................................................xix
Preface ............................................................................................................................................xxi
Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... xxiii
Authors .........................................................................................................................................xxv
v
vi Contents
Amit Konar
Jadavpur University, Kolkata
xv
Foreword II
P.N. Suganthan
Nanyang Technological University
xvii
Foreword III
Swagatam Das
Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata
xix
Preface
Nature has been a constant source of inspiration for scientists since centuries. Various
laws and theories have been formulated by observing the different phenomena that occur
in nature. Nature-inspired algorithms is an area inspired by natural processes; in the recent
past, many algorithms have been developed taking inspiration from certain biological,
geographical, and chemical processes that take place in the natural world. Nature-inspired
algorithms have the immense potential for optimizing complex real-world problems and
have been applied in various areas. In the past two decades, plethora of new and promis-
ing nature-inspired algorithms has been introduced. The highly multidisciplinary nature
of the field further has attracted a number of researchers. There is a mammoth of litera-
ture available in the field of nature-inspired algorithms. The current literature covers the
theoretic concepts, but the practical applications might still be very difficult for students to
comprehend and implement. Many students find it difficult to visualize the application of
nature-inspired algorithms from theoretical text.
This book not only helps them in understanding these algorithms but also exposes them
to the current developments over various related fields. This empowers them to pursue
research in these areas and contribute toward research and development at large. The
main purpose of this book is to explain the nature-inspired algorithms theoretically and
in terms of their practical applications to real-world problems to the readers. This will
enable them to get an in-depth, practical exposure to the methodology of the application
of the nature-inspired algorithms in various situations.
This book can also be used as a standard text or reference book for courses related to
nature-inspired algorithms, evolutionary algorithms, and so on. This book may be referred
for the purpose of elementary and advanced studies as it introduces the basic concepts of
nature-inspired computing and then also discusses some state-of-the-art variants of those
basic algorithms and then finally explains their practical examples. This book also incor-
porates some of the recent developments over various areas.
Salient Features
• Introduction to the world of nature-inspired computing
• Foundations of the basic nature-inspired algorithms
• Detailed description of the problem and solution
• Information on recent developments in the various nature-inspired algorithms
• Interdisciplinary applications of the nature-inspired algorithms
xxi
xxii Preface
Intended Readers
• Students of undergraduate, postgraduate, doctorate, and postdoctorate levels can
refer this book as a text or reference book for nature-inspired algorithms.
• Researchers can refer this book to obtain a good insight into the recent develop-
ments in the field of nature-inspired algorithms.
This book is our yet another step into the world of authored books. It began as a dream to
use our past research as a base to create a landmark into the world of nature-inspired com-
puting. It is natural that the dream required a lot of encouragement, guidance, and sup-
port that were provided by numerous people in various phases of this book. The authors
acknowledge all those people who made this possible.
The authors thank Professor S.G. Deshmukh, director, ABV-IIITM, Gwalior, India, for
extending all sorts of help and support during the course of writing this book. This book
would not have been initiated without his encouragement and support.
The authors thank Professor. Amit Konar, Professor P.N. Suganthan, and Professor
Swagatam Das for writing the foreword for this book. Their precious words have added a
greater charm to this book. The authors further express their thanks to Dr. A.S. Zadgaonkar,
ex-vice-chancellor, Dr. C.V. Raman University, Bilaspur, India, for the guidance and moti-
vation that he has bestowed during the entire course of work with the authors.
This book would have never been possible without the pioneering work carried out by
the coresearchers associated with the authors. The authors also thank the student fraternity
of the Institute for taking deep interest into the courses titled “Special Topics in Intelligent
Systems” and “Soft Computing.” Their interest to learn beyond the classroom program has
been the key motivation for this book. The authors are highly indebted to all the students
who undertook challenging problems as a part of their thesis and came up with excel-
lent solutions and experimental results. The authors thank their PhD students Sanjeev
Sharma, Apoorva Mishra, and Saumil Maheshwari for their constant support during each
phase of this book. The authors thank their postgraduation students Prashant Shrivastava,
Chiranjib Sur, Annupriya, Riya Naval, Alok Sharma, Prashant Pandey, Harshita Lalwani,
and others for the quality results they produced during their course of work with the
authors. The authors further thank Pritesh Tiwari for helping in editing some parts of the
manuscript.
The first author thanks his son Apurv Shukla for his support during the course of
writing this book. The second author thanks her mother Parvati Tiwari and her late aunt
Dr. Asha Shukla for motivation and blessings for writing this book.
This book required a lot of work by numerous people around the globe. The authors
thank the entire staff of Taylor & Francis Group and all the associated units who have
worked over different phases of this book. The authors thank all the people who have been
associated with and have contributed to this book. Above all, we all thank the Almighty for
his constant blessings and love. Without Him, this project would not have been possible.
xxiii
Authors
xxv
xxvi Authors
She has received “Young Scientist Award” from Chhattisgarh Council of Science &
Technology, India, in the year 2006. She has also received gold medal in her postgradu-
ation from National Institute of Technology (NIT), Raipur, India. She has completed 10
prestigious research projects sponsored by Department of science and technology (DST)
and Department of Information Technology (DIT), Government of India. She is currently
involved with the Government of India and is working on three sponsored research proj-
ects. She is a reviewer of various international journals, including ACM Computing Review,
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Elsevier Journal of Biomedical
Informatics, and Elsevier Neurocomputing journal.
1
Introduction to Optimization Problems
1.1 Introduction
In the present world, we are obsessed with solving a huge number of problems. With the
progress of science and technology, humans have been able to tame some of them [1]. Due
to advancements in the field of automation, and knowing the fact that natural resources
are on the verge of exhaustion, scientists, today, are paying a lot of attention on the low
resource (regarding power, time, and occupancy) factor, which can be achieved through
optimization. Optimization can be achieved at many levels.
The discovery of nature-inspired computing and its allied optimization branches has
revolutionized computation and automation, the future of which lies in the hands of
machine learning and self-adaptive systems [2–4].
One might wonder, why adaptive learning systems? In a real-life environment, every
system is associated with some input and output mappings in which the inputs act as the
main decisive factor for the outputs. However, unless the system is carefully designed,
the range associated with the input and output data variables is highly unpredictable and
nonstationary, and there exist a large number of samples. In such a scenario, it becomes
a challenge for supervised learning to establish a nonlinear model, which can produce
correct judgment through the efficient processing of data and intelligent decision-making.
However, there always remain chances of deviation due to irregularities in the datasets.
Hence, there is a requirement for the system to adapt to the appearance of a new data and
the combination of situations.
This adaption is handled in various ways in various situations and it depends on the
mathematics of the algorithms. In this chapter, we will introduce techniques for such
kinds of adaption that are involved in nature-inspired metal-heuristics [5] on many
problems.
This work can be marked as an introduction to a bunch of bio-inspired computation tech-
niques, which can be readily applied to the graph-based and discrete optimization prob-
lems. Before moving further, the term discrete optimization problems should be explained
and illustrated so that you can have a clear idea of what kind or class of problems we are
referring to. Consider an equation of any straight line of the form y = mx + c. For any value
of x ∈ R, where R is the set of Real numbers, the value of y is valid and acceptable and this
is a simple continuous domain problem. There is no minimum or maximum value that
can be achieved due to the nonconvergence attitude of this equation. On the other hand,
an equation of the form y = |x12 | + |x22 | has a minimum value at zero and x1 , x2 both can have
any value in R. What if we say that the equation y = |x12 | + |x22 | also has a minimum value at
zero but x1 , x2 can only take integer values lying within Z, where Z is the set of Integers.
1
2 Discrete Problems in Nature Inspired Algorithms
This is what is referred to as the fundamental discrete optimization problem in which the
variable parameters take only integer values. However, this is not what we are looking
for. We are going for a generalized discrete optimization problem set, which will have the
above-mentioned kind of problems as special cases and we would not have to reformulate
our equations.
Now, optimization may mean different things for different types of problems. For
minimization as optimization of a function f, we have f ( x) ≤ f ( a) where ∀x ∈ S and S ⊆ B
where S denotes the allowed representations for x and B is the constraint for the vari-
able, which can be a domain or range or an integer value depending on the problem.
Here, a ∈ S and f ( a) = MIN( f ( x) : ∀x ∈ S ⊆ B and is called the optimized solution or the
global solution.
(1776-1826.)
very fair instance of Jacobite sentiment
A PLEBISCITE
in London, in the year 1777, presents FOR THE
itself in a record by Boswell, in his ‘Life STUARTS.
of Dr. Johnson.’ The doctor, in argument
with the Whig Dr. Taylor, insisted that the popular
inclination was still for the Stuart family, against that of Brunswick,
and that if England were fairly polled, the present king would be sent
away to-night, and his adherents hanged to-morrow!’ Taylor
demurred, and Johnson gave this as the ‘state of the country.’—‘The
people, knowing it to be agreed on all hands, that this king has not
the hereditary right to the crown, and there being no hope that he
who has it can be restored, have grown cold and indifferent upon the
subject of loyalty and have no warm attachment to any king. They
would not, therefore, risk anything to restore the exiled family. They
would not give twenty shillings a piece to bring it about; but if a mere
vote could do it, there would be twenty to one; at least, there would
be a very great majority of voices for it. But, Sir, you are to consider
that all those who consider that a king has a right to his crown, as a
man has to his estate, which is the just opinion, would be for
restoring the king who certainly has the hereditary right, could he be
trusted with it; in which there would be no danger now, when laws
and everything else are so much advanced, and every king will
govern by the laws.’ It was in the same year, 1777, that Johnson
called the design of the young Chevalier to gain a crown for his
father ‘a noble attempt;’ and Boswell expressed his wish that ‘we
could have an authentic history of it.’ More than a generation had
passed away since the attempt had failed, but Johnson thought the
history might be written: ‘If you were not an idle dog, you might write
it by collecting from everybody what they can tell, and putting down
your authorities.’ It was shortly after that, hearing of a Mr. Eld, as
being a Whig, in Staffordshire, Johnson remarked, ‘There are rascals
in all counties.’ It was then he made his celebrated assertion that ‘the
first Whig was the Devil;’ but this Jacobite definition was provoked by
Eld’s coarse description of a Tory as ‘a creature generated between
a nonjuring parson and one’s grandmother.’ Lord Marchmont thought
Johnson had distinguished himself by being the first man who had
brought ‘Whig’ and ‘Tory’ into a dictionary.
‘Nonjuring parsons’ still existed; but the hierarchy was all but
extinguished.
In the last week of November 1779, reverential THE LAST OF
groups were assembled in Theobald’s Road, to THE
witness the passing to the grave of the last nonjuring NONJURING
bishop of the regular succession—Bishop Gordon. BISHOPS.
There was no demonstration but of respect. Yet there must have
been some Jacobites of the old leaven among the spectators;
though many Nonjurors were not Jacobites at all. To this record may
be added here the fact that in St. Giles’s churchyard, Shrewsbury, lie
the remains of another nonjuring bishop, William Cartwright, who is
commonly called ‘the Apothecary,’ because, like other bishops of the
sturdy little community, he practised medicine. Cartwright (who came
of the ‘Separatists,’ a division which started about 1734, with one
bishop) always dressed in prelatic violet cloth. Hoadley once
surprised a party at Shrewsbury by saying, ‘William Cartwright is as
good a bishop as I am.’ Cartwright hardly thought so himself, for in
1799, in which year he died, he was reconciled to the established
church, at the Abbey in Shrewsbury, by a clergyman who in his old
age revealed the fact to a writer who made it public in 1874, in the
‘Dictionary of Sects, Heresies, and Schools of Thought,’ edited by
the Rev. John Henry Blunt. No reason is given why the alleged fact
was made a mystery of for so long a period.
The very last of all the nonjuring bishops, one of the irregular
succession, died in Ireland in 1805, namely, Boothe. He was
irregularly consecrated by Garnet, who had been consecrated by
Cartwright, who had been consecrated by Deacon. Nonjuring
congregations, in London and elsewhere,—they generally met in
private houses,—diminished and dissolved. Here and there, a family
or an individual might be met with who would use no Prayer Books
but those published before the Revolution of 1688. Probably, the last
Nonjuror (if not the last Jacobite) in England died in the Charter
House, London, in 1875—the late Mr. James Yeowell, for many
years the worthy and well-known sub-editor of ‘Notes and Queries.’
To him, the true church was that of Ken, and his true sovereign was
to be looked for in the line of Stuart; but Mr. Yeowell acknowledged
the force of circumstances, and was as honest a subject of Queen
Victoria as that royal lady could desire to possess.
The Jacobite and Nonjuring pulpits were THE JACOBITE
unoccupied and silent, but the Muses manifested MUSE.
vitality. The tenacity, and one might almost say, the
audacity of Jacobite loyalty was well illustrated in 1779 by the
publication of a collection of songs, under the title of ‘The True
Loyalist, or Chevalier’s Favourite.’ In one of the ballads both Flora
Macdonald and Charles Edward are alluded to:—
Over yon hills and yon lofty mountain,
Where the trees are clad with snow;
And down by yon murm’ring crystal fountain,
Where the silver streams do flow;
There fair Flora sat, complaining
For the absence of our King,
Crying, ‘Charlie, lovely Charlie!
When shall we two meet again?’
At this period, the unhappy Charles Edward was neither lovely nor
loveable. His ballad poet, above, has paraphrased, or parodied, a
popular song, ‘Over Hills and high Mountains,’—but so ill, with
excess or lack of feet, indifferently, as to serve the measure with the
arbitrary despotism with which the Stuarts themselves would have
visited Church and Constitution.
It will be remembered that when Jacobite Johnson JACOBITE
was pensioned, the English language did not suffice JOHNSON.
to give expression to his feelings. He was obliged to
borrow a word from France: he was pénétré with his Majesty’s
goodness. In 1783,—weighing Stuart against Brunswick, Johnson
borrowed a word from the same foreign source, to disparage the
House of Hanover. It must be confessed that Dr. Johnson’s
Jacobitism had become a ‘sentiment,’ in 1783. He could then
indignantly denounce the factious opposition to Government, and yet
account for it on Jacobite principles. He imputed it to the Revolution.
One night, at Mrs. Thrale’s house in Argyle Street, where the
conversation turned on this subject, ‘Sir,’ said he, in a low voice,
having come nearer to me, while his old prejudices seemed to be
fermenting in his mind, ‘the Hanoverian family is isolée here. They
have no friends. Now, the Stuarts had friends who stuck by them so
late as 1745. When the right of the king is not reverenced, there will
not be reverence for those appointed by the king.’
In June of the following year, 1784, Johnson made
BOSWELL, ON
a remark which very reasonably struck Boswell ‘a ALLEGIANCE.
good deal.’—‘I never,’ said Johnson, ‘knew a Nonjuror
who could reason.’ On which observation and on the position of the
Nonjurors and their Jacobite allegiance, generally, Boswell makes
this comment:—‘Surely, he did not mean to deny that faculty to many
of their writers,—to Hickes, Brett, and other eminent divines of that
persuasion, and did not recollect that the seven Bishops, so justly
celebrated for their magnanimous resistance to arbitrary power, were
yet Nonjurors to the new Government. The nonjuring clergy of
Scotland, indeed, who, excepting a few, have lately, by a sudden
stroke, cut off all ties of allegiance to the House of Stuart, and
resolved to pray for our present lawful Sovereign by name, may be
thought to have confirmed this remark; as it may be said that the
divine, indefeasible, hereditary right which they professed to believe,
if ever true, must be equally true still. Many of my readers will be
surprised when I mention that Johnson assured me he had never in
his life been in a nonjuring meeting-house.’—Johnson’s disrespect
for the reasoning powers of the Nonjurors was still less intense than
his detestation of the Whigs. Of some eminent man of the party, he
allowed the ability, but he added, ‘Sir, he is a cursed Whig, a
bottomless Whig, as they all are now.’
Walpole was satisfied that the Stuart race was effete, and that the
family was incapable of exciting the smallest sensation in England.
He could not, however, pass over an incident in ‘the other family.’
In allusion to the Prince of Wales and the Roman Catholic widow
(of two husbands) whom he married,—Mrs. Fitzherbert, he says:
1786, ‘We have other guess matter to talk of in a higher and more
flourishing race; and yet were rumour;—aye, much more than
rumour, every voice in England—to be credited, the matter,
somehow or other, reaches from London to Rome.’ Happily, no new
‘Pretender’ arose from this extraordinary union.
In this year, in the month of July, the comedy of
A JACOBITE
‘The Provoked Husband’ was played at the ACTRESS.
Haymarket, ‘Lady Townley, by a Lady, her 1st
appearance in London.’ The lady and the incident had some interest
for those who held Jacobite principles. They knew she was the
daughter of an old Scotch Jacobite, Watson, whose participation in
the ’45 had perilled his life, ruined his fortune, and caused him to fly
his country. He died in Jamaica. His widow returned to Europe, and
brought up the family, creditably. In course of time; Miss Watson
married a paper-manufacturer, or vendor, named Brooks. His early
death compelled her to go on the stage; her success, fair in the
metropolis, was more brilliant in Dublin, Edinburgh, and other
important cities, especially where Jacobite sympathy was alive. It is
curious that in Boswell’s account of the tour to the Hebrides with
Johnson, under the date, September 7th, 1773, when they were at
Sir Alexander Macdonald’s, at the farm of Corrichattachin, in Skye,
among the things which he found in the house was ‘a mezzotinto of
Mrs. Brooks, the actress, by some strange chance in Skye.’ The
portrait, in 1773, was not that of an actress; nor was the lady then
Mrs. Brooks; but that was her name, and such was her profession
when Boswell published his Life of Dr. Johnson, in 1791; at which
time, however, he was not aware of her Jacobite descent. Some
persons, unpleasantly advanced in years, recollect old Mrs. Brooks’s
powerful delineation of Meg Murdockson, in T. Dibdin’s ‘Heart of Mid
Lothian,’ about the year 1820, at the Surrey Theatre, and they
suggest that she was the old Jacobite’s daughter.
In the year in which the Jacobite’s daughter made
BURNS’S
her first appearance in London, as ‘Lady Townley,’ ‘DREAM.’
Burns wrote the verses which he called ‘A Dream,’
with this epigraph:—
Thoughts, words, and deeds the Statute blames with reason,
But surely Dreams were ne’er indicted Treason.
The poet then dreams of being at St. James’s on the king’s birthday,
and addressing George III. in place of the Laureate. The feeling
expressed was no doubt one that had come to be universal,—
namely, of respect for a monarch and his family, about whom,
however, the poet could see nothing of that divinity which was
supposed of old to hedge such supreme folk. But Burns recognised
a constitutional king, from whom he turned, to attack his responsible
ministers:—
Far be’t frae me that I aspire
To blame your legislation,
Or say ye wisdom want, or fire,
To rule this mighty nation.
But, faith! I muckle doubt, my Sire,
Ye’ve trusted ’Ministration
To chaps who, in a barn or byre,
Wad better fill’d their station
Than courts, yon day.
In the following year, Burns still more satisfactorily BURNS ON
illustrated the general feeling as being one of loyalty THE
to the accomplished fact in the person of the king at STUARTS.
St. James’s, but with no diminution of respect for the
royal race that had lost the inheritance of majesty. This the Scottish
bard expressed in the ‘Poetical Address’ to Mr. W. Tytler. He
lamented indeed that the name of Stuart was now ‘despised and
neglected,’ but, he adds:—
My fathers that name have revered on a throne;
My fathers have fallen to right it.
Those fathers would spurn their degenerate son,
That name should he scoffingly slight it.
Still, in pray’rs for King George, I must heartily join
The Queen and the rest of the gentry:
Be they wise, be they foolish, is nothing of mine;
Their title’s avow’d by my country.