Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Educating Activist Allies Social Justice Pedagogy With The Suburban and Urban Elite 1St Edition Katy M Swalwell Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Educating Activist Allies Social Justice Pedagogy With The Suburban and Urban Elite 1St Edition Katy M Swalwell Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/educating-for-critical-
democratic-literacy-integrating-social-studies-and-literacy-in-
the-elementary-classroom-1st-edition-kathryn-m-obenchain/
https://textbookfull.com/product/janusz-korczak-educating-for-
justice-1st-edition-joop-w-a-berding/
https://textbookfull.com/product/greenspace-oriented-development-
reconciling-urban-density-and-nature-in-suburban-cities-julian-
bolleter/
https://textbookfull.com/product/critical-social-justice-
education-and-the-assault-on-truth-in-white-public-pedagogy-the-
us-dakota-war-re-examined-rick-lybeck/
Cities and the Super-Rich: Real Estate, Elite Practices
and Urban Political Economies 1st Edition Ray Forrest
https://textbookfull.com/product/cities-and-the-super-rich-real-
estate-elite-practices-and-urban-political-economies-1st-edition-
ray-forrest/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-activist-director-lessons-
from-the-boardroom-and-the-future-of-the-corporation-ira-m-
millstein/
https://textbookfull.com/product/environmental-justice-and-urban-
resilience-in-the-global-south-1st-edition-adriana-allen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/new-teachers-in-urban-schools-
journeys-toward-social-equity-teaching-1st-edition-althier-m-
lazar/
https://textbookfull.com/product/chattanooga-fall-2-1st-edition-
s-m-schuster-katy-light-boyd-craven-jr-la-bayles/
EDUCATING ACTIVIST
ALLIES
SocialJustice Pedagogy with the
Suburban and Urban Elite
Katy M. Swalwe/1
11 Routledge
I~ Taylo,6.FrandsQoup
NEWYORIC
AND LONDON
Fim published 2013
by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Simult:mc:ouslypublished in the UK
by Routlcdgt:
2 l1Jrk Square:, Milton Park. Abingdon. Oxon OXl4 4RN For my mom, who is always in my heart.
R,1111/r,(~r
is ,111
i111J1tilll c,..,.,,,
.if1/1rT<Jy/,,r[~ Fr,mris ,111
i,y.,1111"
/,11,ittr.ss
(0 2013 T :1ylor & l'mtcis
The right ofK:11y M. SwJlwdl to be idcmilicd as author of this work hJs
been asserted by her in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the
Copyright, D<:sig11sand l'atcms Act l'JH8.
All rights reserved . No pJrt of this book may be reprimed or reproduced or
uuhzed in any fonn or by any elccironic, 111echmical,or other means, now
known or hcrcJlier invented, including photornpying and recording, or in
any infonnation s1or•gc or retriev.al sysrem, wi1hou1 pcnni ssion in writing
from the publishers.
Tradrm,1rkr1,•1irr:
Produce or corpor-.atenames may be tr•dc111.1rks or
registered tr-Jdcmarks, and arc used only for identification Jnd cxpbnation
w11hou1iment 10 infringe.
Ul,r,1ty,f C.•11J.1rrss D,11"
C.,1"/,'J,/it((l•i11-/'11/1/ir,11ic111
Swalwcll, K:iryM.
f.Jucating activist allies : social justice pcd.agoh'Ywith the suburlm1 and
urb .111elite / by Kary M . Swalwcll.
p.1gcscm. - (The critical sociJI thought series ; 38)
Includes bibliogr:iphic al rl'ferenccs and index.
I. Elite (Social scienc•-s)-Educ a1ion-Uni1cJ St:itcs.
2. Upper elm-Education-United Sratcs.
3. Critical pedagogy-United Smcs. I. Title .
lC-1941.S!.132013
371 .8:!621-Jc2J 20120375%
ISBN : 978-0-415-52945-7 (hbk)
ISBN : 1>78-0-415-5:!9-l<,-4 (pbk)
ISBN : 978- 0- 203-11780-4 (cbk)
T ypeset in lkmbo
hy Cenveo Publ isher Services
PARTI
The Education of Privileged Youth in Theory 1
1 Why the Education of Privileged Children Matters 3
PARTII
The Education of Privileged Youth in Practice 29
3 Sheltered and Exceptional: Privileged Students'
Conceptions of Themselves and Their Communities 31
126
Appc11dixA 129
SERIES EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION
Appendix B 141
Natcs 145
Refcrc11ccs 156
llldcx
. . . • Schools and the teachers within them arc ~nd~r con- to make a major ditference in the lives of their students and in the communities
arc wrong Ill tlus society. . i offered include such things as markct1zat1on and in whi c h they are embedded (see also Gutstein, 2006). Even more recently ,
certcd attack. The ans~ei:5 bent . l· d ever more testing, pcrfonnancc pay Vajra Watson has shown what this looks like in community-based education
competition, standard1zat1on o cumcula aln . , I d to keep up. There is actually {WatsOI!, 2012) .
• proposa st 1:1t1t s 1ar
for teachers, and so many more 1 . ctually work in the long run Much of the emphasis in critical education has been on poor and oppressed
.d that any of these proposa s a d
little robust evi ence . . . tly being contested in large an populations and this is true of most of the material to which I pointed in my
?006) F rther these poh c1es arc constan )
(Apple, - . > • u .' . . d schools throughout the n.ation (sec Lipman, 2011 .. previous paragraph. In no way do I wish to diminish the crucial importance of
small ways m conunumucs an_ . . fi well-known educators who had prcv1- the hard work that teachers, community workers, and so many others continue to
Indccd, even in the fac~ of c~t1c1smsl_r~m d who are now totally opposed to do to build an engaging, culturally responsive, and socially critical education with
I ·d these donunant po 1c1csan
ous y supportc l I f "refonns" still keeps coming. these students. However, because so much attention is rightly given to the poor
them (Ravitch, 2011), the ava anc_1eol ti1"t "re possible or available. and disenfranchised and to those whom this society has marginalized as the
1 nl ducauona responses .. ..
But arc these. t 1e o y e_ "No " There is a rich set of .1pproaches that h,ivc "Other," less attention has been paid to critical education for those who benefit
Herc the answer ts a resoun~mg 1· d unities throughout this nation the most from this society's dominant institutions and power relations, what Katy
I d . d used Ill schoo s an comm .
been deve ope an d'ffi t kinds of nonns, ones involvmg Swalwell calls the "suburban and urban elite."
and many others . These embody very ftl cren ds cn't1'cal and democratic- This is a distinct problem. All sets of social relations are just that-relations. For
. d · Both o t 1csc wor -
critically democratic e ucauon . 1· . d ctices that arc embodied in these there to be the "poor" there is a corresponding category of the "affluent ,"
. Tl educational po ic1cs an pra 'd f
arc unportant. 1c d . t ower relations inside and outs1 c o For there to be "people of color" there is a corresponding category of people
approa~hes illuminate and _co:t:s: tl~::::s::r: the agency of teachers and stu~cnts. who see themselves as the "human ordinary"-"White." Th.is simple point
cducauon. But they do so .n~ y dagogically their aim is not to sunply has considerable political bite. There is not a poor problem unless there is a rich
They are indeed deeply cnncal . However, pe . I •
. d dominant ideology with anot icr. problem. There is less of a Black problem than there is a White problem. Less of
replace one unqu~s~1one . I ve a vc long theorcticJl and practical his- a gay problem than a straight problem. Less of a women's problem than a men's
These more cnt1cal approache _s ldi~ ?OOi) Some arc based in the influential problem.
• , Apple Au and Gan n, - · ·· l
tory (see, e.g., • ' F •· Others come from cnttca This has important implications for education and for Swalwell's book. It asks
B
work of the great r.1z1ian c
r •ducator Pau 1o n:1re.
. . tivists cultural workers, and
. developed by connnumty ac , us not only to focus on those who are oppressed by this society's dominant power
educationa I pr.acttces U . d S • But 110matter where they come relations, but to also pay considerably more attention to those who are situated in
. I l I lout the mte tatcs.
teachers m sc 100 st iroug • . d ducarion for social justice and to classed, gender, and raced positions that give them more advantages because of
• · d •cply comnutte to an e
from, eac I1 o f t I1cm is t: I . I di students teachers, and com- that very location.
r . I ·s that sees pcop t..'-lllC u ng ,
a set o f ega itanan va uc . . K S alwell and the fine book you are Among the tasks of the critical scholar/ activist in education are: 1) to tell the
munities-as co-responsible subJeCtls: aty fwd cators asking and answering the truth about the nature of the inequalities in tlus society; 2) to show where there
d 't t ·din a long ustory o e u
about to rca arc st ua c . I I n lay a role in social transfonna- are opportunities, spaces, for engaging in work that challenges these inequalities;
qucstion of whether and m what ways sc 100 s ca p
and 3) to act as critical secretaries of those individuals and groups who are engaged
tion (Apple, 2013). . .. "t'cal eda ogy" is that it is often in the creative and hard practical etforts of actually successfully acting on these
One of the criticisms of the literature on en t p I . g_ •ry style makes it
. . h convoluted ways, t tat its vc challenges (Apple, 2013). EducatingActivistAllies does all three and does them well.
so theoretical, and wntten m sue! I• . ht enter into it. This will not Jo. It is grounded in a substantive understanding of the ways this society is organized
I rd r-. ducators to see w tcre t iey nug . I d'f.
very ta ior c d . . . I work and how to do it wit • I - to produce massive inequalities in power and resources and in how schools fit into
We need powerful analyses of how to o ~nuca .
f d d . l different kmds of settings. these relations. It illuminates the spaces in schools where teachers have maintained
fcrcnt kinds o stu ents an . n . . II democratic educators have tumed their autonomy and where they can engage in critical pedagogic and curricular
There arc places to wluch ma~yblc~uca. y • of conservative attacks on schools work. And, finally, it provides us with detailed portraits of what committed critical
. . f what is poss, e m a umc
for rich d escnpuons o . be a center for the pro- educational work looks like in classrooms.
and teachers. The journal Rctl1i11ki11.1?kScpliools clonbtmuk~ss::ch as Dc11111cratic Sc/1Mls
· · \ d · c·anal wor · opu ar 00 f But this is not all. Swalwell is a fine writer, someone who does all of this with
motion of cnttca e uc., I 1 .. v ·n teachers and administrators, many o theoretical elegance and insightful accounts that draw the reader in to the lives of
(Apple and Beane, 2007) also tavc gi c Id d detailed looks at class- real teachers and students in real communities. She takes us inside the classrooms
whom are deeply dissatisfied with what they arc to to o~ 1· . • . d pr.actices
. 't'cally democrauc po 1c1cs,111 of two dedicated and talented teachers, both of whom are working in affluent
rooms and entire schools that arc usmg en I •
xvi Series Editor's Introduction
Lastly' l want to tl1.1nkthe students who participated in this study as. we~I as
d L' J hnson two exceptional educ:itors who contume . to
~cr~on Sl~an an •:n:i and ~rofcssional life and whose real identities I wish
111sp1reme Ill my pcrs · d b nerving
, der to properly acknowledge them. It is no ou t un
l cou Id reveaI Ill or ,, d al
e a stran er into your classroom who may cnt1que an an yzc your INTRODUCTION
to welcom I •g arely hesitated to invite me "behind - the- scenes" and let me
~very mo:e, yet t teti:r. d challenges. This book would quite simply not have
111 on their hopes, ears, an · I · ed our
been possible without their generosity and openness and l gcnume y cnJoy
time together. From the bottom ofmy heart, thank you.
. k I ard While politicJI debates rage about why about how they are educated, however, we must first address the problematic
anyone can get ahead ,f they wor l . d I ght to be done about them, nature of a category like "privilege" given the multiplicity of ways that all of us
d . equalities persist an w 1at ou
. I 10 .
economic an rJcta
1
ti • United States is beconung experience advantage or marginalization to some degree.
few debate this basic truth: in fundamenta w.iys, le
more separate and less equal. d .. ffi ct.ivcly disavowing a need for
. S preme Court ec1s1ons e e I Who Is Privileged?
Despite recent u . , ( n • ,ts Sea/lieSclrtiol District,Mere,1ii Iv.
· d tional pohc1es e g. i-iirc, 11·
rJce-consc1ous e uca . . ''d tru<mle with significant and increas- A discourse of privilege within social justice circles has emerged in the last several
Jiffcrw11 e(>1111/y ), pu blic schools nattonwt .
e s .,.,
(Orfi ld F ankcnberg & Garces, 2008}. s
A
decades from a rejection of traditional justice-based work focusing on the oppres-
ing economic ,md racial -segregJttO~ _1e 'b r.b l chart~r ·md private schools sion of particular groups towards a deconstruction of the ways in which dominant
t'. ·i· ll their cluldren Ill su ur ai , ''
more White i;mu ies enro I ) fi Other r.icial groups (Frankenberg, groups maintain and reproduce power (i.e., studying the ways in which men
t students (or teac 1ers rom d
with lit cle exposure o d t of color are siphoned into un er- actively reproduce sex.ism as well as researching women's experiences of oppres-
W ?010} more stu ens
Siegel-Haw Iey, & :mg, - ' I 'd l l ,. in the country's large urban sion) (Bonnett, 1996; Choules, 2007). With her landmark article "Unpacking the
.. e=tcd" or "apart 1e1 sc 100 s . .
funded 11yper-scgr r,- rfi ld ?003) Though the stereotypical Wlute, White Knapsack," Peggy McIntosh (1990) is probably the most famous example
• b •ro Lee & 0 ,c ' - . .
centers (Fr.ink en c .,, ' . ki' I· ss urban center 1s of how someone adopting a position of privilege (in her case, White privilege)
I kirtS of a diverse wor ng-c a
wealthy suburb on t 1e ou~s. ti WI . • tudt/ms is still the nonn. In fact, the finds herself made newly accountable to those whose oppression benefits her.
changing,' racial homogeneity or l ulte sl • 77% of the student body is also Postcolon.ial, postmodern, cultural, and critical theorists have also been quite
. d ·nt attends a sc 100 w 1erc .l
aver.ige WI ute stu c . . . ualities exacerbate this r.icta productive in problematizing traditional liberal and conservative understandings
., 009 } u d ·rlymg econonuc 111eq
White (0 rfitcId' - . n c 430/ fBI· ck and Hispanic students attended of oppression and privilege, particularly with regards to male privilege and
. F . uple as of?009, 70 o a Id
segregation. or exa1 ' - I ·1 t'. than 4'.V..of White du rcn Whiteness (e.g., McIntosh, 1997),
. over 80'¾>w 11 c Jcwer
schools with poverty rates dl O uk & Acevedo-Garcia, 2010). Ovcr.tll, A variety of tenns with different connotations has surfaced: terms that
attended such schools (M~Ar . c, syp 'is 58'¾, of Whites' (Isaacs, 2007}, arc de-center privileged people like non-marginalized, tenns that indicate active intent
Black families earn a mc~1an mcomc t~1at b 'l'ty than Whites (Sharkey, 2009}, like oppressorand dominator,and tentlS that imply an invisible hand producing
.k I pcnencc ccononuc mo 1 1
much less l1 ·c Y to ex • . . ,ffrcts of the recent foreclosure inequality like advantaged, privileged,and dominant.An emerging field offers work
and have disproportionately felt the ncgJtlVe c c
focusing on a pedagogy for the uo,1-pPor(Evans, A., Evans, R., & Kennedy, 1995),
epidemic (Rothstein, 2012). .1 I . ps however as the correlation pedagogyefthe oppressor(Schapiro, 1999), pedagogyfor 1l1eclii/drenefthe oppressors
Mobility has decreased for all r.1c1a/ ct u~IC grou • .· ' l· (S whill &
. . d. 1e has unhmgcd for the workmg c ass a (van Gorder, 2007), or educatio11for theprivileged(Goodman, 2000a, 2000b). Because
between product1v1ty an mcon
l
. I
tto ?011) Sunp y put, t 1e
l • current oap between the rich
r-·
of their prevalence, [ have adopted the tenns communitiesefprivilegeand privileged,
Morton, 2 007 ; Al egrc ' - . · . A , . can history. Whtie the .iverJge with the hope that they encourage "the beneficiaries ofinjustice to see themselves
· f the widest ever Ill men
and the poor 1s one O • bout ?5% in the past forty as implicated and having some collective responsibility for the perpetuation of
l · •. mings mcrease a •
American househol d saw t 1c1r ca . d b ( 8'¼ the top 1% by 323% injustice" (Choules, 2007, p. 474).
. f th • richest 5% has mcreasc y } "• .
years, the mcomc o c • • b 49"' ¾, (Khan, 2011). A recent Econouuc I adopt th.isdiscourse with great caution, however, in an attempt to listen to the
. I •st one-tenth of a percent y - l (:3 50 1
and tllC nc le S'¾ fl seholds currently contra i • 111 insightful critiques from scholars who warn that the term "privilege(d)" obscures
Policy Institute report notes that tl~;~i)
;~om;~ matters worse, it is not just that the subject of domination by describing oppression as happening without the
of the nation's wealth (Allegretto, - . . oorer (Bernstein McNichols, & knowledge of the oppressors. For example, Hernandez-Sheets (2000) critiques
· · I • , tile poor are gcttmg P ' h
the rich arc gettmg nc 1cr. , ble of roducing sue the use of this "nice word" in relation to race as a "benevolent and socially imposed
Nicholas, 2008). Though some may defclenda syrdsstc1:~l1:ardpawork "~!us kind of gap prerogative of Whites ... (that] can reinforce feelings of superiority and help con-
· racy t 1at rewa .. •
wildly d.ispar.itewcaIt Il as a mentoc . Wilki ?009} It is struct personal and group identities based on the devaluation of others" (p. 19). To
. . s. • and fundamentally unstable (Pickett & nson, - .
1ssocially corro ive . • .. ducation, he.11thcare, and energy avoid the use of a term that reinforces injustice, critical race scholars recommend
1
also unlikely to change soon given steep y n~m_g e cial safety nets.
.I h t privJtize or elnumatc many so a discourse of"supremacy" that acknowledges privilege, but only, in the case of
costs coupled wit t a pus o I I • ·ry least whether or not race, as a "function of whites' actions toward minority subjects and not as mysteri-
These worrisome statistics den~onstr.itc ~ l~t: at; :~l~~ren is ~ot an irrelevant ous accumulations of unearned advantages" (Leonardo, 2009, pp. 89-90}. [fit
we should care about the educau~n ~f ~nv1l~g:rticularly with regards to their weren't so cumbersome, I would rather identify elite or privileged students
topic: such students exist and thctr pnvt _ege_ ~ l c indeed ought to care as those positioned by power rel:itions within systems of supremacy that are
economic security) is intensifying. Before JUsttfymg w 1y w
•
Why the Educationof PrivilegedChildren Matters 7
6 The Educationof PrivilegedYouth in Theory
. . 1 . 1 litical and economic factors and that Privileged groups, on the other hand, are those which maintain cultural
. l I d by h1stonca soc1a • po • l b and institutional domination by creating structures and systems that reflect and
continuous y s ,ape d. . 'bl consciously or not, to those w ,o en -
when rendere mvm e, . ·1 d
are ma d e stronger d f. . I wever l use the tenn pm•r t'J!C promote the internalization of privileged values, normalize their values and beliefs
efit from them most. To prevent rea e_r au~e, 10 ' by supporting particular policies and practices, believe in the superiority of their
ti · I winded clanficauon.
as shorthan d or t 1us ong- f rivile as a set of unearned advan - values, and actively grant material and psychological benefits to their peers at the
Tr.1ditionally, scholars have made sense o ~ (. ge race gender, sexual orien - expense of subjugated groups. This process does not require nefarious intentions
. ll constructed categones e.g., '
tages based upon soc1a y 1 .. ble to avoid benefiting from regardless to work; in ways both subtle and explicit, these systems condition people to think
tation) within which people are la~e ~ una b • t'ng to tally privileges in an of themselves as normal (Goodman, 2000b; Johnson, 2006) and to make small
. s Wlule it may e temp I
of their level of conmousnes.. .. balance sheet in which one can allowances for critiques in order to silence them (Buras, 2008).
· " ial 1denunes are not a
additive fasluon, our soc . .. I d minant side and the number on Ultimately, all ofus embody traits by which these forces oppress and pri vilege
1ber of idennnes on t lC o I "
just compare t I,e nun h .vilege or freedom one ,as us based upon aspects of our personhood deemed important for membership in
. .d d know how muc power, pn ' . 'I
the subordinate st e an d'fi d understanding ofpnv1 egc subordinate or dominant groups . Though these identities are complex, fluid (to a
(Goodman, 2000b, PP· 32- 22). Such a coann~o l i;scholars focusing less on the point), and relationally situated, it is important to recognize that there do exist
b . licated by a new generauon o
is rightly emg comp " . il d" people and more on the unjust pro - people who, in general, gamer unearned advantage in most situations and who
unequal benefits enjoyed by pnv ege d' d 'd t'ty fonnation and its related more often than not can claim association with elite groups . These people , and
. ·1 . io culturally me iate a en l
cess~s of_pnva egmg as soc - ward 2008; Khan, 2011). I would include myself in this category, are net ben~daries of privilege who,
distnbuuon of resources (e.g., Ho ' . . then privilege represents a "because of their positioning within the dominant group at both a local and / or
f )ear cut fixed charactensucs, '
I
Rather t ,an a set o c - ' b I . l fl . d dynamics produce complex, global level, attract privilege of different sorts [granting the] ability to act without
context-dependent, mediat_eddpr_o_cess(By wtl~1ncg1eru1?003· Johnson, 2006; Curry - consequences and as if one had the right to set the rules" (Choules, 2007, p. 461,
. di I enuues ran • - •
sometunes contra ctory, d ?00") Such a situated process of 472). In other words, these are people who have the "luxury of obliviousness "
· M Kay ?007· Leonar o, - 7 •
Stevens, 2007; D e1us- c ,- , d . . s values perceptions, thoughts, Qohnson, 2006). Conversely, there are people who dominant groups consistentl y
l t hapes an mamtam ,
privilege serves as a 1ens t l~ s , If . I· n· 11to others. Rather than some - marginalize and whose actions are severely constrained regardless of context-net
. rdmg one s se Ill re a o
feelings, and acuons reg.t . . " .. . ·1 •d" writ large, what is more mal~ciaries.2
one simply identifying as "margtnahzcd ordsp"n0v01£:e)ge r "modified binary frame• It is important to note that acknowledging the ways in which one is not
· 'd · " (Edwar 1 0
likely is an "intersectmg ' entity 'd , .-. . teract in concert with others' permanently privileged does not justify a relativist stance whereby all people
. f one' s multiple 1 ennues m
work" wherem aspects o . I .. oderate or exacerbate an experi- oppress and are oppressed so chat everyone is equal in a sort ofinjustice wash. On
· ·on at hand to e1t 1er m
identities an d t l1e s,tuao . the other" (Curry -Stevens, the contrary, there are individuals who claim membership in certain groups that
. ·1 one hand and oppression, on .
encc of pnv1 ege, on ' he abili to claim membership in domm ant tend to be unjustly favored by hegemonic forces at the macro and micro levels in
2007, P· 37). In my case, for cxa~ple,_ t. hi tystatus and physical ability groups ways chat make a deep and lasting difference. To claim otherwise is arrogant at
racial, social class, sexual identi~, c1t1ze~s . ~ . c:nversely my gender, home worst and ignorant at best, especially if one's "knapsack," as Peggy McIntosh
. rfi l ways m most s1tuanons, • d
positions me m powe u d . ( d ·n relation to certain people) ten (1990) would say, is very full. For the purposes of this project, then, these net
region, and religious backgroun at u~1es an i beneficiaries are referred to as privileged people while net maleficiaries (those
.. tside the margms of power .
to pos1t1on me more ou f I. . il ·ng / maroinalization process to whose experiences in the aggregate tend to deny them access to resources
tiinc ·1spects o t llS pn v egi · r-· •
Severa 1 scI101ars ou • . .nalized in 3 given situauon, and opportunities) are referred to as marginalized people. These experiences of
'd 'fy Io is privileged and w 1,o is margt . ·1 d
help 1 enn w I di . . I s among the char.1ctcristics of pnv1 ege domination and oppression take a variety of powerful fonns including sexual
Goodman (2000b) helpfully snngu1s_l~l d . d. . duals are those who lack orientation, physical ability, and gender. 3 In American society, however, there are
. il d ,,oups Pnv1 ege m iv1
individualsan d pnv egc .~. . d . b. tit who easily deny or avoid the few ways in which this process of privileging operates more powerfully than by
. d. ng pnvalege an its ene • s, I
consc10usness regar 1 . . f · ority and entitlement t 1at tile racialization of people and their stratification by social class.
. d who mamtam a sense o supen
privilcgmg process, an I . . t the expense of oppressed peop 1e.
their needs should be met even w ien it is_:entities ,fourinauls as people who
Similarly, Hackm an's (2005) tax011o~nilyt I bet1·eve that their life and it5
Race
ti cir pnv egc, w 10
are actively taught not to see . l dI . and who have done nothin g to Recent advances in genetic technologies prove beyond the shadow of a
privileges are the nonn for society a1_1 . 1umaruty,
doubt that race is not a biological truth (fempleton, 1999), but rather a social
cam the benefits that accompany pnvalcge .
Why the Education of Privfleged Children Matters 9
8 The Education of Privileged Youth in Theory
. . . ut of a desire to distribute power based upon hier- We live today with the result of these efforts: the United States is among
cons~ruction that ongn~ated o Black identities. For as deeply embedded as it is in the wealthiest of nations in the world yet struggles with a history of indigenous
arclues that favored Wlute over_ 1 efarious category that has grown genocide, slavery, segregation, and increasingly high numbers of people living
. "WI "teness" is a relauve y new yet n . .
society' u . I . I ti n and deliberate actions begmmng below tJ.!epoverty line. It has also produced a fairly fixed class structure: a small
more powerful through conscious . egis al o laws <>Miltingrights distinguished yet extremely rich capitalist and corporate managerial class, an unstable middle
· ti n of the Amencas w 1en o· -
with the coIomza o I d. d red servants of European heritage class whose position is tied to training in technical skills for jobs with particular
d African peop e an m entu
between ensIave Tl . . hand complex: history ofimmigr,mts credentials, a large working class rapidly losing any former protections they may
. . ?OO?·Johnson ?006). 1ere is.a nc ..
(L1psttz,- -, •- . I . b tween Whiteness and c1ttze11- have had through unionization, a segment of this working class with little to no
struggling with how tonegottat; t 1e ~o;;:;t1~1~e:e Italy, India, and a range of job security, and a thoroughly marginalized poor whose living conditions make
ship, partic~larly amon_gthoosfiete:opt:opr;e fro:n these ;egions have been compelled it virtually impossible to acquire the skills and education needed for jobs to
Lan·n Amencan countnes. • d
. I Bl ck peoples in or er to gam so
· c1'al lift them out of poverty (Wright and Rogers, 2010): 1 Throughout American
to distance themselves r.ither th~n ~y ;~~) ~istorically legislation has encour- history, varying degrees of regulation, taxation, and other policies have attempted
and economic advantages (e.g., o ey, - - . of wiute supremacy (Lipsitz, to address these issues, but rarely has capitalism itself been questioned (Mattick,
aged such divisiveness in order to support systems b . "American" has 2011).
?00") Throughout the history of the United States, econunft d. ?00?)
-, - .fi b ·n conflated with becoming "White" (Barrett & oe i_ger, .- -: al. When thinking about who is a net beneficiary of racial privilege, those who
t 1us o ten ec . . t Whiteness as a soc10-lustonc- can claim Whiteness are clear candidates for such a status. Thinking about people
t1 .rty years growmg attentton o b
In t lie past u ' b d" . 1· f"White studies "There seem to e who are privileged by capitalism, on the other hand, is a bit more complicated
I suited in a su - isc1pme o .
phenomenon 1asre . d u· e analysisof Whiteness from yet clearly important in that class distinctions create "unequal possibilities for
h ches to tlus field- a econstruc v
at least t ree approa . · 1988) a call for the total abolition of flourishing and suffering" (Sayer, 2005, p. 218). Scholars thinking about social
0
a social and historical pcrspecove _(e.g.{ 99;~r, d th; advocacy of a re-articulation class are not in agreement about how to describe an "inherently indescribable
Whiteness (e.g., Garv~y & lgnaaev,. b • aln998 Leonardo, 2009). In dunking concept" (Conley, 2008, p. 367). It is not simply a matter ofhow much income a
. ( Kmchcloe & Stem erg, • . .d
ofwl uteness e.g., . . all rivileged by their racial 1 en- family generates (Lareau, 2008) nor whether someone is an employee or the
.al . . edagogy with peop 1e typ1c y p
about soc1 JUsttcep . . d d constructive analysis that "examines employer (Wright, 1997), though clearly how much money people have, how
tity'. I adv~cate re~artaculaoo;s!;;~ a:: ~o:Unation and as a viable, progressive, people earn their money, and what people do with their money are all important
wluteness m relatton to op~ . 2000 . 16). This position rejects calls aspects of social class (Hout, 2008).
and contradictory category (Rodnguez!, ds' p ·gnore how deeply embedded For the purposes of this book, I focus on those children from funilies who
.. . ti t such an approac l ten to I
for abolmon given ta . . I. Whiteness (e.g. the marginali- identify themselves at the top tiers of Wright and Rogers' (2010) taxonomy: the
. . · erlooks the differences wit un '
race 1sm soaety, ov . ,. d ·roru·cally may strengthen the capitalist and corporate managerial class and those in more stable upper-middle-
fi d "Wlute eras11 ), an , 1 •
zation of people re erre to as I ich can unwittingly lead to the classpositions. I also take into account Conley's (2008) "folk concept" of class, the
flawed position that race does not matter w l
ways in which laypeople think about class that include the trajectories related to
srengthening of White supremacy (Rodriguez, 2000).
someone's education, occupation, and income. It should come as no surprise that
this approach can produce complex:identities for people (e.g., the factory foreman
Social Class without a college education who owns multiple rental properties or the attorney
. . - I h' history of racialization in the with little disposable income because of large student loans and alimony pay-
In addition to and often in conJuncaon wit l t is . . ded in
. fl f an econonuc system groun ments). My focus, however, is on those individuals in "clear classpositions" whose
United States are the deep m uences o ital.ismis rooted in the racial and classstatus most ofi:en align and who tend to leverage them as a means
the principles of a competitive market system. Modem ~ap . ngaged
. O fWestem European profit-shanng corpor.inons e for moving into homogenous "good" neighborhoods filled with similarly classed
six:teenth•century nse tural and human resources and raced people (Pattillo, 2008).
in high- risk investments to compete for control over na . stem depended
. Tl wth of such an econonuc sy Whether focusing on race or social class, we are wise to remember that the
in Africa and the Amencas. te gro 1 b . the fonns of indentured and two are intimately bound (in both historical and contemporary tenllS) in what
upon the exploitation of cheap and free a. or I~ con uest of indigenous Johnson (2006) calls a "matrix of domination" and what Pattillo (2008) refers to
enslaved peoples as well as cheap resou~~es,mcludmg :1~ ~ li t political agen· as "inflection" in that class "inflects" race. Leonardo (2009), too, poetically con-
peoples and their territories through mibtary means an impena s
nects advanced capitalism with Whiteness (and patriarchy) as "the hour and
das (Marx:, 1990; Wright, 1997).
Why the Educationof PrivilegedChildren Matters 11
10 The Educationol PrivilegedYouth in Theory
. bl • it should not surprise the critical educator Meiners, 2007). In no way am I advocating that the actions of activists and
minute hands of a clock so pred1cta c, l ·l b I . d" (p. 182). Historical teachers, the gaze of researchers, or the efforts of policymakers ought to ignore
ti d the other lurks c osc y e un .
that where you m one, . ' l ·ct1·ons· the enslavement of Afncan these issues.
d f ti ·se categones com c . b
examples ab oun o le . f ·cy among working-class peoples y I do._ however, claim that students from communities of privilege face
i: c: Ib the prevention o um d b
people lOr ,rec a or, . . l/ I . groups and current c ates challenges that merit further investigation. Very few scholars have empirically or
k fi competmg racta et m1c •
hiring strike b rea crs rom " I " taking "our jobs." theoretically looked up the social ladder to understand the education of these
. . . tering around those peop e
about mmugrat1on ccn . I I focus more on rJce or more on youth. The work of Anyon (1980), Bourdieu (1984), Lipman (1998), Brantlinger
· b k there arc tunes w 1en
Throughout t lus oo , l I 11cases I acknowledge that t 1ic (2003), and Lareau (2003) are notable exceptions that provide important insights
. 1 I l p the two togct 1cr. n a ,
class and umes w ien um b .. d diffcrendy in relation to both catego- into the way privilege is reproduced through, inscribed upon, and experienced by
. hich someone may e pos1t1one
ways m w . . • of"privilcgc." people from dominant groups. 6 Recendy, there has been a burst of ethnographic
rics no doubt influences their cxpene~1ccs r tcd beings whose multi-layered activity studying elite private day and boarding schools (Howard, 2008;
I want to reitcr.ite that we are ~ comp tea_ , ·ecy of contexts. Though Gaztambide-Femandez, 2009; Khan, 2011) foUowing in the footsteps of Cookson
r rymg degrees m a van
identities influence our ives to :a . . I ti d nor binary we cannot ignore & Persell (1985), as well as an attempt co understand the mechanisms at work in
· ·1 d ·dentlty 1s nclt 1cr ixe •
it is clear that a pnv1 cge I • ·-1 , d class lines as a powerful Ivy League coUege admissions (Karabel, 2006; Stevens, 2007). Building on
, .l c along evolving racta an
the existence o f pnvi cg . . . . st consequences, particularly the work of King5ton and Lewis (1990), Howard and Gaztambide-Fern:indez's
. avoid addressmg its unJU
process. Ne1t 11cr can we b d I haracteristics that make them net (2010) edited volume, Educati,igElites: ClassPrivilegeand EducationalAdvat1tage,is
· d ho tend to em o Y t te c fi
with t 1tose stu ents w l . WI ·ceness and who come rom a particularly useful compendium.
beneficiaries (i.e., students who can c aim u What this recent scholarship tells us about the education of privileged youth is
middle -/ upper -class fumilics). that they are often cultivated to appear capable ofindependently juggling multiple
responsibilities and to engage in intense competition with the aplomb of a profes-
What Do We Know about the Education sional. Parents and teachers in privileged communities tend to "concertedly cul-
of PrivilegedChildren? tivate" their children (Lareau, 2003), which results in students rarely feeling safe to
. . . • . .nd I want to clarify what I mean by an make mistakes or take the risk inherent in creative and critical thinking (Howard,
With this concepaon of pnv1lcge mknu 'b t ' ts effects on privileged children. 2008). In his recent ethnographic work exploring schooling at St. Paul's Academy ,
. d cl' e what we ·now a ou 1
elite cducanon an ou m . . f . il • I define an elite education as the for example, Khan (2011) found that teachers and White students naturalized
In keeping with my defimuon o pnv egc, oftl1e benefits granted them social hierarchies as artifacts of a meritocratic ladder system, Students pointed to
.d · cc and expect as one
schooling that clul rcn expen~~ d 'al For example, children from their diverse range of experiences rather than their heritage in order to justify
· · . pnvilcgc soc1 group.
by their mem b erslup m a . l d t social class, have parents/ their position near the top, actively ignoring the deep relationship between the
k ds especially those re ate o . I
privilege d b ac ·groun ' . I b I dswith access to safe, stable, lug 1- two. As a result, successful students expressed an embodied sense of ease and an
guardians able to move them int~ ne1g l or l~O • •putable private school. In articude of radical egalitarianism in tenns of their cultural tastes rather than a sense
. l l or simply pay ior a re
achieving pu bl ic sc 100 s . . rivilc ed schools have barriers to entry of entidement marked by cultural distinctions of"high" culture. Not surprisingly,
other words, whether pubhc or pnvate, p ~ b th as markers of and makers upper-class straight White male students succeeded more frequently in this system
(explicit and implicit) that help them to serve o
than did students who identified as working class, LGBTQ, female, or from a
5
of privilcge. 1 attend private and public schools racial background other than White.
By most conventional measures, srodcntsbw d10. •ll· in generJl they tend to Regardless of their demographic descriptors, what we know from the
.. f . ilcgc appear to c omg we ' '
serving commumtics o pnv . l . t't t1·ons of higher education. To small body of empirical work about these students is that those who excel within
d d te and mamcu ate to ms 1 u d
get good grJ cs, grJ ua , . n le resources and attention and arc indee privileged school serting5 tend to be those who embrace hierarchies, ignore struc-
be sure, these children have received a, p b rd to idcntif.y them as an tural inequalities, and demonstrate egalitarianism and politeness on the surface
. · f ways (t may seem a su
likely to succeed m a vanety o . d '1tl1students from marginalized groups with a streak of independence and competitiveness just below. Denis-McKay
. · way when contraste w d
at-nsk group 111any k ow on standardized tests, are pushc or (2007), for example, describes a poignant example of one litde boy in her class at
who struggle to demonstrJte what thefiy n ll • etc These are students whost an international school in Mali and challenges his "successful" identity in school
d t graduate rom co egc, · .
drop out of sc I100 1s, . o n~ . • demand inunediate attention in when he refuses her assignment to write a thank you note to someone who had
schooling is dearly 111 c~s~s and whose n~e-~ d not (e.g., Valenzuela, 1999i helped him:
ways that students in pnv1leged commumues o
Why the Educationof PrivilegedChildren Matters 13
12 The Educationof PrivilegedYouth in Theory
d . all talented and demonstrated Grimke sisters and Freedom Rider Jim Zwerg exemplify the ways in which social
Although this student was acal enuc y ble to critically reflect on his capital and power granted to people through unjust systems can be wielded on
. over and over 1e was una
academic success '. . . 1·r 11dhe was certainly unable to behalf of groups working to upend them .7 More cautionary tales, like those of
. d d I .s own posmon m uc, a
own culture, 11l ec u . A hild of great privilege in a land of m:ed, he middJe-f lass White feminists m:irginalizing working-class women and women
connect or fonn commuruty. c k b cl rs and guardians His parents of color (Thompson, 2002), underscore the importance of caring about the edu-
had been cared for by nan_rud·es,_co\~~eyuw:r: unable to buy ~aring, how- cation of privileged students as part of a larger strategic move to create a more just
. d . ny people to prov1 e care.
lurc fl .
and humane society for all people.
ma ed . hi bility to be critically re ccove
. d this student was stunt m sa ..
ever, an .. ll ral" ground of his privilege, as well as his ability to It is important to note (and will be addressed in more depth later) th.it students
about the mora Y neut are unlikely to come to the same conclusions about how to solve social problems
form connection and community. (p. 31) or whether or not to participate in social justice movements. To demand they
do so would be indoctrination and anti-democratic at its very core. To expose
. . I beliefs that are undesir.ible to students to the realities of an unequal world, to raise questions about how best to
Additionally, this schooling perpetuates olt ter. . l1t way of knowing address that inequality, and to ask students to think about their complicity and
. . · d ogy· that t 1ere 1s one ng
advocates of social Jusace pe ag .. . to others that one should do obligations, however, is not beholden to one's political affili.itions and critically
· I cess comes from bcmg supenor ' ·
and d omg, t tat sue . . d by accumulating possessions, important for a functioning and healthy democracy .
whatever it takes to win, that fulfillment ts game d ?008) Last, but not least, an interest in privileged students' education represents a
that others are too different to relate to, etc. (Howar ' - .
concern for them as participants in oppression given that an unjust society dehu-
manizes not only the marginalized but also those who benefit from its inequality
Why Care About Privileged Children? . . (Freire, 2000; Luthar, 2003). Though benefiting from oppression clearly manifests
. . ort an affinnativc answer to the ongtnal itself in increased m:iterial and social power for net beneficiaries of privilege, it
There are three d1sonct reasons to supid • bout (and by extension, study) also significantly hinders people's ability to build fulfilling lives (Choules , 2007)
question of whether or not we shou care a '
and frequently produces feelings of alienation, meaninglessness, randomness ,
privileged kids' education. d . of unequal opporcunities and isolation, pain, and dysfunction (McLaren, 1998; Goodman, 2000b; Dennan-
First, if we are s:ou1\1~t:::~ ;~::e:~:e:u;nnot just about p_oor people but Sparks & Ramsey, 2006; Denis-McKay, 2007). According to Wise's (2008) memoir
outcomes, we _mu . • co le of all social classes. Focusmg only on the of Whiteness,
about the relaoonslup b_etween p . pil d "unchancnng and unproblematic
. 1· d . ks making the pnv ege an i:,· di d
margma 1ze ns t1· (?00J) refers to as the "unstu e To define yourself, ultimately, by what you're not, is a pathetic and heart-
. ,, (B tt 1996) or what Bran mger -
locaoon onne • . om Others are favorably com- breaking thing. It is to stand denuded before a culture that has stolen your
.. 1 . .ned control group '.lgamst w 1t
but posmve y unag1 d . . 'legcd students' schooling helps birthright, or rather, convinced you to give it up. And the costs are fonni-
,. ( 10) In other words, stu ymg pnvi d.
pare d P· . l . ·1 d chools are inherently good an m dable, beginning with the emptiness whites so often feel when confronted
to demystify the assumption t tat pnv1 cglle s "d wn" tl1us enriches our under- by multiculturalism and the connectedness of people of color to their
S d · "up" as we as o
no need of change. tu ymg . . . / . ' nalization and how oppression , various heritages. That emptiness then gets filled up by the privileges and
standing of the consequences of pnv1leg1ng margl
ultimately forces us to become dependent on them. It's hard to deny th.it at
operates. . c • 'I d communities are very likely to the end of the day, this self- imposed cultural genocide has cost us more,
Secon d ' gi·v e·n that clnldren I lrom pnvi Ider ege
ensuring that these students are in the long run, than it's worth.
·· f wer as t icy grow O ,
occupy pos1aons o po . . f . . d encouraged to orient themsclv~ (p. 171)
· ·cal exanunanon o society an
expose d to a cnu . li cl understood) str.itegy in the larger
towards justice is an unportant (though t e_ kb u'ng "misled miseducated In addition to these more philosophical concerns, there are tangible physical
. . . tic • If not they ns econ • .
project ofintcrrupung lllJUS c. .: I d . I . t n'cal realities" (Gorski. and mental health issues that may be unique to communities of privilege. This
. ciopohnca an socio us o
citizens when it comes to so .. . le from dominant group! includes higher rates of drug-induced deaths, binge drinking, and suicide (for
2006 pp.165-166).Historically,cnocallyconsc1ouspleopl ,. ( (:0) in liberatiOII
' F . (?000) called "a fundamenta ro c P· l which the only group with higher rates are Native American men) (Centers for
have had what reire - I fi 1.onal class like che Disease Control and Prevention (CDC] Report, 2011), as well as lower levels of
mGovcmentsd. SMto n' ca~t~~;~:~~~!~:;i~:r::v~~o~;,:~ea:~:i:: likc the abolitio~ happiness than their less affluent peers, and particular fonns of anxiety, depression,
uevarJ an 01 1
14 The Education of PrivilegedYouth in Theory
A lot of my studenlS have cultural capital and moH of their families are
doing pretty well economically. I'm therefore trying to look at the way I teach
about social justice issues and see if I am enabling studenis to use knowledge
about oppression to their own advantage rather than take it permanently into
their hearts,
(Aiul, a 1e,ul1trin Nortl,'sstudy;Nortl,, 2009, p. 165)
There are many ways to think about how students in privileged communities
ought to be educated. One approach that no doubt drives many parents' decisions
about where to enroU their children is to think about which school will best
prepare them for prestigious universities and job opportunities. In many ways,
this is understandable: most parents want their children to have access to a
high- quality education and successful futures. Yet only considering how best to
prepare students for universities or jobs does little more than preserve, if not
enhance, the forces that privilege elite students (Swift, 2003) .
Another way to think about the question of how we should educate privileged
c hildren (or any children, for that matter) is to consider the needs of a democracy.
What kind of citizens and community members do we want and need privileged
people to be? What kind of education will best prepare them for embracing these
responsibilities? These are loaded questions with inherent nonnative qualities
(What is best? What ought to be?), as well as a range of possible and legitimate
solutions. In their influential examination often civic educational programs in the
United States, Westheimer & Kahne (2004) highlight how educators' pedagogi-
cal choices reveal three very different visions that are helpful here of what kinds
of citizens are needed for a healthy democracy. These perspectives include person-
ally responsibledtiz e11sliip,participatorycitize1isl,ip,and justice-orienteddtize11ship.
Disconnected, Paralyzed, and Charitable 17
16 The Education of Privileged Youth in Theory
. f pe-onally responsible citizenship equipping and empowering them to work for a more socially just society
. b · the perspccuvc o ,,
Civic educauon cm racmg . . f .. with good morJl character who themselves. This composite definition includes intrapersonal development
teaches students that the cu_luvanondo c1t1ze1d1Sob ·d1'ence will solve social prob- in the teacher, pedagogy and dispositions that support equitable access
'bT depen cnce an c
demonstrate rcspons1 'ity, m . . '. . I ·p on the other hand, empha- to learning for all, a curriculum that can empower all students to
oting paroc1patory cmzcns u ' I become agents of social justice themselves, and activist teachers engaged in
lems. P~ogrJms ~ronl1.. d I . role within established community structures t tat
stze taking an acuve ca ers up . oc·1cty Lastly educational efforts challenging and transfonning inequitable structures and policies in schools
" · der to improve s · •
serve the "less fortUnate m _~r . I d ts that good citizens question and society.
. . · t d ciuzcnslup teac 1 stu en •
rooted in Jusucc-one~ ~ . •dly reproduce injustice and actively (p. 285)
hen it is shown to repcate
the status quo w . • throu h social movements.
work to change those estabhshcd systems! t tl1ogughthere is some overlap among This approach can trace its roots to myriad influences: Jesuit priests working
, d K hne (?004) assert t 1a , ..
Wcsthenncr an a - . . . · · " They cnuque t 11c within a liberation theological framework, critical theorists working within the
I •s present "co1161cung pnonues.
them, these three approac 1e d. . Uy responsible or participatory Frankfurt School tradition, and popular educators like Paolo Freire working
. d . I prom-Jms rootc m persona
many civic c ucauona ,,,.. . I b I . . ns dangerously depoliticize within a "pedagogy of the oppressed"--all actors who mobilized scholarship and
.. l. . I the dann t iat ot l v1s10
fonns of cmzens up ~1~ l . . . al idios ncrJtic acts of kindness over social education as a means to fight against the deep social and economic inequalities in
democracy by emphas1zm~ md1v1du • . y d ·11·tyover demands for change. their communities.
· f" t c • and cncourJgmg oci
action in the pursuit o JUSI e I lly responsible and participatory It is worth noting that any conception of social justice education means very
k wl ·dge that bot l persona
Though t I1ey ac no, e . b I found that attempts to educate little if not linked with the rich philosophical tradition of nonnative theory
.. k d commumty mcm er., t iey
c1ttzens ma ·e goo . . ffi ·ent for a robust democracy. exploring why we should value equality and justice and what a society that values
.I I ·nds m nund are not su ,c1
students wit l t iese. c . I e (?004) call for democratic educational equality and justice should look like (e.g., Leistyna & Woodrum, 1996; Fraser,
Ultimately, Wcstheuner ~nd_ Ka I~ -d tions of citizenship linked to 1997; Gutmann & Thompson, 2004) . Hopefully, the following description will
I size JUst1ce-onente concep . I
programs t Itat emp ta . d I •· . ti at is also known as soc,a appease readers whose visions may differ in important and reasonable ways. ln
. . . . . a type of tcaclung an eanung l
civic part1c1pauon, brief. my conception of the "more just world" towards which education ought to
justice pedagogy· orient itself is one that recognizes and affinns difference (e.g .• cultural, sexual,
political) while maintaining a commitment to fundamental human rights and
democratic principles (e.g., freedom of speech and freedom of religion). It is also
Social Justice Pedagogy ..
• I ·d with the multiple cducationJI tradinons one that challenges the current distribution of resources in order to secure
It is easy to become ovcrwhe m~ I in an attempt to cultivate this kind of the basic needs required for human flourishing (e.g., safety, food, shelter, water,
that inter.ect and borrow from eac lot l~r / ,· (Kumashiro 2004), aitical love) (Nussbaum, 1992; Fraser, 1997) •
·ustice•oricntcd
.·
c1t1zc11S
Inp.
· • 1ti•opim·ss111c
a, c, uca
T
'"" & B-ttodano' ?002 · Apple,
J I recognize tl1at this description is loaded with loaded terms; indeed, shelves
, M La 1998· Oarder, orr~-s. .u '- '
pcda~o,l!y (Shor, 19 !>2 ; c ren, ' · Kahnc 1998· Apple & full of books have been written to think through the finer points and inherent
Au,· & Gaudin, 2009), ,lcmoaati~sclw11/i11,I! ~(McstGhc.m1&crB~nks 19;5), m,:/ticulturall tensions in what is meant by "human flourishing," "democratic principles," and
• ? . P· kcr 2003), cq111ty pcda.~o)!y c cc • .
Be.me, _QOO, ar ' ks & B· k ?006- Sleeter & GrJnt, 2007, "human rights." To be as transparent as possible, my understanding ofa more just
. . . (N' ?000· Ban . an s, - ' . .
a11tr-rac1s1
cduC11t11111 ieto, - ' . (I ks 1994) tcad1i11~ for equity a,11/ JUSlllt world is rooted in a critical theoretical framework that assumes unequal power
Pollock, 2008), tcachit1,I! '" tr1;:.~w ,~;) 'and tca~/1i11)!s11ci11I Ji,; actio11
(Schultz, relationships and challenges the belief systems and social relations that (re)produce
(Bigelow, Harvey, Karp, & .' er, - ' • t1'011ssl1·•re are the fundameneli power differentials . Ultimately, this understanding of a more just world asks what
. · ·t t •rrclated conccp ..
2008). What these d istmct y~ •_nc fi k of social justice ctlucatio11 (Ad,uns, sorts of transformation are needed to eliminate oppression and exploitation. "This
principles and objectives w1thm a rJmc".'or t • B ks ?004) question implies not simply an explanatory agenda about the mechanisms that
'ffi 1997· Ayer. Hunt & Qumn, 19 !>8 , an ' - · ,,_1
Bell, & Gn Ill, ' . • ' .' . . •ducation that is perhaps most usellll generate economic inequalities," Wright (2008) says, "but a nonnative judgment
The workmg dcfinmon for social JUsace e f tl1e aforementioned trJditioOS, 3bout those inequalities-are fonns of'oppression and exploitation-and a nor-
. to incorporate many o
here is one thdatzatte1bnplts (?008) cast a wide net when they define it as mative vision of the tr:msfonnation of those inequalities as part of a political
Chubbuck an cm Y as - project of emancipatory social change" (p. 334).
. , d • t cdagomes that impro\lC Burin (2002) wonders if unequal conditions can ever be overthrown given that
. I • ·ffort to transfom1 policies an cnac p o· J-'i.
A tcac 1er s c .
1
d ·d students w 111' oppressive structures seem to be so deeply embedded in society that they are
the learning and life opportunities of typical y un er.;ervc
Disconnected, Paralyzed,and Charitable 19
18 The Educationor PrivilegedYouth in Theory
. . ·s mind the goal of social justice pedagogy for According to North (2009), this age-old debate between critical and func-
immutable and mevttable. In _lu f'· d pc from 'oppression', we are all tional literacies does not, however,
. .. t resistance o an esca
privileged peop 1e ts no a . f I . of power. The goal is rather the
. . d structl ve o re auons
constructed wit 1un an con . . 1' ducti·ve' understood as providing Ad_equately capture the development of additional competencies for social
. f I1 r relanons wtt 1 pro
P roducttve use o sue powe . . ' k If' (pp 14-15). Goodman justice that require more than a bundle ofknowledge and skills. These com-
ti tialines to rema e onesc .
greater rather than ewer poten 'd . . s ~nd alteniatives that change petencies include cultivating solidarity, working through difficult emotions
.. e need to provi e v1s1on ..
(2000b), too, notes t 11at, w . db 1 . In this sense, the aim is not Qike shame, fear, and guilt), and publicly acting up--that is, directly chal-
eople's ways o f I · ki ng, actmg ' an e iavmg.
tun. b
· ··
I ange the very nature of lenging the status quo-when called for. Deep-seated dispositions toward
P 1 who has power ut to c 1
to change roles or c 1ange I . . 1 I elpful and quite pr.igmatic in that social justice rarely if ever emerge from the efficient, scientific planning of
.. (p 195 _ 196) I find t 1ese ms1g 1cs 1
the system P· · . k b l w best to mobilize their resources people. . . . Instead, poignant experiences and interpersonal relationships
. il d pie to dun a out 10 . d
they ask pnv ege peo . Id F while it is unlikely that pnvtlege often incite people to work collectively for a more just and peaceful world.
in order to build a more JUSt worl . orl entirely from the contexts that (p. 75)
Id uld extract t 1emse ves .. ,.
students wou or co . . . ducation that asks them to clmu-
. · ble to 1magme an e
privilege them, tt ts poss1 d I t c\1·•t vision requires of them Keeping in mind Noddings' (1984) "ethics of care" and Antrop-Gonzalez &
. d f . ty they want an w 1a .. .
about what kin o socie k . ·nd l1owever that while radical de Jesus' (2006) "critical care," North (2009) thus recommends the concurrent
·· W must ·eep m nu '
in their current positions. e I . m1ediate or viable of goals, it is development of a relationalliteracy.She notes, however, that, "even an education
· not be t 1e most m .
social transfonnanon may
. . .
d
d ogy eman e uca
els d tors ~nd their students consider
..
that develops critically enlightened and caring citizens does not always realize
one that social Jusoce pc ag vibrant, just democratic communities. We also need communication skills that
(particularly if they are privileged~. . gfi I way a socialJ·ustice pedagogical allow us to expose and ;iddress conflict and controversial issues nonviolently"
dd I · es m a meamn u ,
In order to a ress sue 1 issu . . 1) xposing students to multiple (p. 109). Building upon the work of Westheimer and Kahne (2002) and Parker
.I thr ·e pnmary tenets. e
framework re ies on c f . . d copies ") a democratic class- (2003), she establishes the need for just such a democratic
literacy.Finally, inspired by
. I d th • voices o margma 1ize p '- .
perspectives t I1at me u e e . d 3) portunities to participate m the work of Greene (1995), she calls for a visionaryliteracythat asks students to
I . . lues student vmce, an op . f
room structure t tat va . b d social action that address issues o practice imagining a better world. This literacy relies heavily upon the arts and
· . nd conunumty- ase
project-base d Ieanung a ks pping out the key elements students' creative faculties to complement the analytic, rational modes of thinking
. • • I •. • •ral helpful fr.imewor ma .
nuustice. • T 1ere are seve ti . .de11tifiesfive .. essential com- emphasized by functional and critical literacies.
H kt . ("005) or mstan ce, 1 .
of such a classroom. ac nan - . • I des ex osure to multiple perspecuves, In summary, social justice pedagogy attends to the following three elements:
ponents" : (a) co111e11t ,uasterythat idncu pesn·onsuch infonnation, (c) s,,cial
· I I t \lo w stu ents to qu
(b) criticala11alys1 s IM st ia a ti b . hopeless or complacent by 1) a curriculum that includes multiple perspectives (co11te11t masterylfu11ctiot1al
. t tudents rom econung
tools that I1eIp preven s
c/11111.~c . l ti both students and teachers and criticalliteracy)grounded in an assumption that systemic, institutional
. · (d) se[f-rejlectu>11 too s or .
eng-.iging them m acuon, . . I . ti k and (e) an arvarcuess of ,uu/tr- oppression exists (criticalat1alysistools/criticalliteracy);
I
to make sense o f t 1eu ives
. r wttlun
1
t us ramewor ,
. 1 . stice teachers approach the prevt-
.
2) a democratic classroom where students' voices are valued and lives reflected
cu/tura/~roup,ly11m11 ics that affects 10w soc1a JU (awaretiessof multiculturaldynamics/democraticliteracy)with opportunities to
. . 1. di •rse groups of students.
ous four dynanucs _wit m~ ~ v:Un North (2009) outlines five "literacies" derived engage in individual critical self-reflection (awarenessof multicultural
Morerecently,andquitc use y, I ~•i·ng with what it mean s to dyttamicslseif-rtjlcctiontools/relatio11al
literacy);and
f ki rroup of teac 1ers strugo'
from her study o a wor ng g SI 1pl1·•s1· zes that none of the literacies 3) practice participating in collective action at the micro and macro levels (social
be enaaged
.m soci·a1JUS • t'i cc• pedagogy. 1e. en ..
.,,. k lll concert wit. I1 .an d i' ntionn each other. changetools/democratic a11drelationalliteracy)in order to build a less oppressive
alone are sufficient but rat 11er must _wor 1 k f Ladson - Billings ( 1994) society (soda/cha11ge tools/visionaryliteracy).
. I 1. dr.iwmg upon t 1e wor o f
The first is a jimct,01111rteracy . ' ("008) conception o
. I t be likened to young s -
and Delpit (1995) t I1at nug l . ti . d skills from the dominant The hoped-for short- and long-term outcomes of this pedagogy are that
... osure to 111 onuauon an .
"powerful know Ie d gc · exp · · Tl ·s kind of literacy 15 students will (a) be aware of injustice in the world and understand its root causes,
. cess to more opportunmes. u
culture that trans Iates mto ac . . . I /'tcracypractices that (b) feel empowered to address that inequity as agents of change, and (c) ultimately
d must also eng-.ige 111 crriwr 1
not enough, howeve~; stu ~nts kill d knowledge from multiple perspecuves act in ways that help to create a more just and equitable world (Ayers, Quinn, &
enable them to exanune these s s an Stovall, 2009).
(Gutstein , 2006) .
Disconnected,Paralyzed,and Charitable 21
20 The Educationof PrivilegedYouth In Theory
from districts, as exemplified by recent legislation in Arizona against ethnic studies
programs (Orozco, 2012) and the opposition to teaching "critical thinking skills"
Complications . in "social justice as part of the GOP party platform in Texas (Republican Party of Texas, 2012).~
fi K-12 classroom teachers engaging . Despi!e the overwhelming odds, however, many narratives exist of teachers
ln recent years, resources or . ead and accessible (e.g., readers like Ayers,
~gogy" have become more w1despr . . Ed ,· ('>009) publications from finding ways to bodt satisfy and critique the demands of an audit culture without
pe d d ,rs . I) treeIII uca,0,1 - ,
sacrificing their committnent to engaging in content that values multiple and
uinn, & Stovall's Handbooko; oo11 us . . like NYCoR.E, curriculum
Q ts teacher orgamzanons . .. ·al marginalized perspectives, student-centered practices, and democratic social
Rethinking Scliools,gr-Jssroo . . d 1 education programs with soct
. . . cines an teac 1er .
conferences m many maJor .' . f 1 tem1 however, should not imp 1y a action working with students and the larger community to address social injustice
.ustice" in their mission). The ~b1q~1tyr.o t 1e_ts ,fii:cacy or its goals. Rather, the (see Ayers, et al., 1998; Apple & Beane, 2000; Wade, 2001; Cutstein, 2003;
J . f. mng its lonn, t e , . d Hackman, 2005; North, 2009). A largely anecdotal body of evidence about social
unified concepuon o its mea ' d tion raises important quesnons an
increased attention to this approach to e uca lutions.2 For example, how justice pedagogy paints a picture of students, teachers, and community members
. b . us answers or easy so 1 engaged in academically rigorous, personally satisfying, and socially transforma-
exposes tensions with no o v10 ' "teachin for social justice" a process, a goa '
should this pedagogy be enact~\ ls 1 rs r!cus on increasing opportunities for tive teaching and learning (see Ayers, et al., 1998; Apple & Beane, 2000; Gutstein,
or both (Bell, 1997)? How nug t teac l~ us curriculum to students' cultures 2006; Au et al., 2007; Schultz, 2008; Ayers, et al., 2009; North, 2009). I cannot
marginalized students by conn_ecti;~9~ n:;1:e also promoting anti-oppression state clearly enough that, while most public school teachers fuce standardizing
(Ladson-Billings, 1994; Oelptt, . _) .. al curriculum (Apple, 1993; Ayers, curriculum, larger class sizes, fewer resources, more narrow conceptions of
activism through an inclusive, ann-rac1s_t,c~~~- Wade, 2001; Kumashiro, 2004; accountability, less autonomy, and stiffer penalties for "failure" (a depressing state
998· Apple & Beane, 2000; Freire, - ' of affii.irsif ever there was one), such a climate does not make social justice peda -
et a1., 1 • ?009)?
Au, Bigelow, & Karp, 2007; Anyan, - e ~n social justice pedagogy, it is als~ gogy impossible. If anything, it cries out for a deeper commitment to teaching
Beyond how teachers should enga~ ... ti "about redistribution, recogm- that critically analyzes society, connects to students' lives, and urges students to
undear to what ends it should be ~on~- is b!~:eceen the two f{ oung, 1990; Fraser, act on what they learn.
It is worth noting here that some scholars bemoan the slippery vagueness
n·on , or a more sophisticatedl rclanons ?006)? Shou Jusnce-
tp Id. . on'ented discourse be one of
of the term "social justice" and warn of its becoming an irreversibly empty buzz-
1997·• Gewirtz, 199H; Nort 1,· -il .
(Chou es,
1 2007)' What keeps th.is pedagogy
· ·
charity' human rights, or p~v e~e . . or another fonn of oppression word despite its proponents' best intentions (Hernandez-Sheets, 2003; Hackman,
from being Leftist ideological mdoc~~n~t00107n· Applebaum, 2009)? Should "jus- 2005; North, 2006; Chubbuck & Zembylas, 2008; Boyles, Carusi, & Attick, 2009).
llsworth, 1989; B utm, · '>002·
- • Au ' eta.i.,. - . ' d ~ct·1ons present an dti uture, Its dilution is not only confusing and frustrating to those who align themselves
(E · di ·d al ' onentanons an
tice" goals focus more on m vt ~ s k
d ' •
embers of a collective society with the tradition, but is potentially counterproductive to the aims most social
· d acnons ta en as m "009)• justice educators promote by asking too little of those in power (Choules, 2007;
or on the orientat1ons an ki 2006' North 200H; Leonardo, - .
v .., e "004· Gars ,
.
(W estheuner & ""'m ' - ' . .' ' -hegemoruc· c I·assroon u
unter Leonardo, 2009). Butin (2007), for example, draws attention to how such watered-
. st m creanng co d
Ft.nally • how might teac 11ers mve 1· . t the school district, state, an down definitions tend to serve those who would find it most unpalatable
. . . · ·table po 1c1esa • by avoiding the "very difficulty originally meant to be engaged" (p. 2). From a
while also orgamzmg against mequknt 2005· North 2006)?
2005· Hae . \an, • ' . . 1 . ·s postmodern perspective, Ellsworth (1989) critiques the vagueness of social justice
national levels (Anyon, ' I. . d "pproach to teachmg is t 1at it t
. . . I , dy sop usttcate (and its cousin "empowerment") as ahistorical and depoliticized. Using a more
Compb caung t 1us a rea
d
k b d managerial conunon sense
rr ·nt mar et- ase , . .
attempting to counter t 1\e cu c t"ves neoliberals, authontanan critical theoretical lens, Hackman (2005) recognizes the benefit of multiple
tf,.l' · f neoconserva 1 , entry points created by a broad definitional range, but concludes that dilution
promoted by a loose a . iauon o "ddle class (Apple, 2006). What results ~rom
opulists, and the professional new lnub . w1·th dosing the infamous adueve~ "ultimately does the field a disservice by . . . weakening the call for teachers,
P . fi • · tiona o session l I
such a hegemmuc orcc is a na . . d 1 ·ously affecting urban sc 100 s schools, and communities to be true vanguards for change" (p. 103). Gorski (2006)
. f pohc1es e eten I and Buras (2008) go further in suggesting that this vagueness leaves too much
mcnt gap and the creanon o . 1 k 'ds and students of color.' T iese
. . •. . nts working -c ass t , d ~
that pnmanly serve mmugra ' b ucrJtic requirements an pres room for Rightist interpretations that purposefully maintain the status quo of
. . 1 burdensome urea
well-documented, mcreasmg y der social J. ustice pedagogY a inequity (e.g., Hirsch, 1988; Payne, 1996).
. l ublic schools seem to ren of Loosely defined and disconnected from its roots, then, it is suggested that
sores on teachers m t 1e p ) l ddin'on some of the successes
· & w od ?004 . n a • l e perhaps social justice pedagogy should be retired from the educational commu-
utopian dream (Meiers . o ,- . 1 . tice pedagogy into schools \al/
integrating a critical, mult1cutlur~, soc1~ JUIs 1' " (BurJ s 200H) or banished nity's evolving lexicon. While I acknowledge these concerns, I believe the term
. b pted into a "righust mulucu tur.i ism ,
either ecn co-o
22 'The Educationor PrivilegedYouth in Theory Disconnected, Paralyzed,and Charitable 23
. . I be set aside ju st yet. ~ Ultimately, the dominant culture also can learn ofinjustice and embrace their own role as
has a history and potential too nc ldto .. r debates about its possible
allies in the creation of a more just society.
d . • rchcr an practmonc
tensions surface m rcsea . have been quite productive and
(pp. 282, 285)
and desirable meanings, though not con e1us1vc, ?
rd ?006· Chubbu ck & Zembylas, _OOH).
important (e.g ., N 0 1• - '
Such attention to group dynamics and the social context of students' lives is
surely good practice for all teachers (Hackman, 2005), though it may be particu-
Social Justice Pedagogy with Privileged Children larly salient when considering these implications within a classroom implementing
, ditions ofliberation movements with oppressed a social justice framework.
With roots firntly planted m tra . . f I unts '-"'ocus on the possibilities Frustratingly, there are few empirical studies that specifically address teachers
. onty o t 1esc acco 1'
peoples, the fact t Itat t 1le vast maJ . r d groups makes histori-
. , da gy with students from margma izc engaged in social justice pedagogy with privileged K-12 students (Hernandez-
of socialJusucc pc go . . A ?0oo7 ,. Erickson, 2009). Given that Sheets, 2003; Curry-Stevens, 2007). Those that do exist tend to focus on a critique
· I • (Giroux 1992 u, -
cal, even et Iuca' sense •
•
' ' I I w'1th a critical consciousness of service-learning with privileged students (e.g., Wade, 2001; Himley, 2004;
'Id , likely to enter sc 100 s
privileged clu ren arc u~ handful of scholars advocate for the theorization and Gorski, 2006; Butin, 2007; Swaminathan, 2007), a description of multicultural
already formed, however, a I . ttuned to their unique needs. education with White students in undergraduate classes (e.g., Gannon, 2004;
. f · l · tice pedagogy t 1at 1sa
implementation o soc1a JUS I d . ant culture relies on unques- Chizhik & Chizhik, 2005), an examination of privileged people's discourses
7) I t "because t 1e onun
Denis-McKay (200 notes t 1a_'. name critically reflect, and act are equally around privilege (e.g., Choules, 2007), or an analysis of adult learners from priv-
tioned privile~, the opportumues !~ 27 •. According to North (2008), "when ileged groups (e.g., Goodman, 2000a, 2000b; Manglitz, 2003; Curry-Stevens,
denied the pnv1leged and the other'-"' (pd. )d l It. while others arc debating the
A1· 1g to find ,oo an s 1e er 2007; Heinze, 2008). The majority of existing literature that connects social justice
some students arc strugi:;,11 I t e we cannot expect a single pedagogy with non-marginalized populations focuses on White, middle-class,
f I . d d placement class over t 1a on ' ,.
ments o t us a vancc . b «- . '-"'r all students in all contexts. pre-service teacher-education students considered to be the "first significant
. 1. . ducauon to e cuect1ve 10
approach to socaa JUsuce e I d • tl1at tl1ose students with the most privileges audience" ofsocialjustice pedagogy (Chubbuck & Zembylas, 2008) as they learn
· "We can cone u c ·
She continues: ' I . pie's sutfering if they are gomg to how to teach students of color and/or students from high - poverty urban com-
need to do more than 'learn about ot 1er peo
· t "(p 1"00) munities (e.g., Cochran-Smith, 2004; Gannon, 2004; McDonald & Zeichner,
effect real social c 1ange · - · . . l ·d '-"'or
a ditferent approach 2009; Zeichner & Aessner, 2009).
d (?009) surular y notes a nee ,,
1n tem1s of race' Leonar o - L , ' b lief that the proletariat must In the late 1960s, Miel and Kiester (1967) conducted a study of suburban
, d I1en he references emn s e
with Wlute stu ents w / . . d In addition he contests the schools showing a need for the curriculum to include challenging social issues
. I b ·sic rcvoutwmzc · '
be educatedwlule t 1e ourge01 I b fi o-d1scoursal White students to expand affiuent children's "life-space." Twenty years later, Howard (1981)
. I tional schoo s ene it mon .
assumption t 1at conven I I ...:ten by default immersed m advocated a "multiethnic curriculum for monoethnic schools" with Project
. d \ts of co or w 10 are 011 , •
when compare d wit 11 stu e1 "al" al . knowledge· "By contrJst, white REACH (Rural Education and Cultural Heritage), a four-phase curriculum
"and "unoffica- . ten1anve .
"counter- di scourses ,uc racial understandings framework focused on human relations, cultural / ethnic self-awareness, multi-
. d fi ge these same counter- 11egen10 . d
subjects o not or . d. lopment, that is, color-bhn cultural/multi-ethnic awareness, and cross-cultural experiences. Building upon
because their lives also depend on a cert:1111 ev~, H3)
his work, Peoples-Wessinger (1994) also wrote about her time as a physical-
strategics that maintain their supremacy as_~gr~uiJ ~~der~served youth" as the
education teacher exploring multicultural education in a monocultural (White)
And though they expli~itl~ re_ferenc~ typ1c~l;ubbuck and Zcmbylas (2008)
targeted population for social JUStacepe gogy, . I. I school in Vermont. Examples of more recent work include Derman-Sparks and
call for educators and scholars to think about the ways m w uc l Ramsey's (2006) book What if All tl1eKids Are White?, which offers research
reviews, case-study vignettes, and voices of teachers in the field in their guide to
. a1· d or from the dominant culture, need to anti-bias/multicultural early childhood education of White children. Drawing
All students, whether margm ize .. d redistribution as
upon the literature of adolescent psychology, Seider (2008, 2009) identifies a
leam and respond to the demands of b~th recogi_1monan . alized students
, f , stice In socially JUSt teaching, margm b decrease in affluent students' levels of empathy for economically disadvantaged
expressions o JU · ··· . ta! · · · are to e
.. d as obiccts of soc1e U>JUSnce... people after participation in a social justice pedagogy English class. And Denis-
who have been posmone -.J • • bl . and
. b' ts who challenge meqmta e status qu 0 McKay (2007), a teacher-researcher working at an international school in Mali,
•1npowcred to act as su ~ec I f the
ework to create a b etter soc1c. •ty [while] ... those students w 10 are part o explicitly focuses on the social justice teaching and learning ofK-12 privileged
Disconnected, Paralyzed,and Charitable 25
24 The Educationof PrivilegedYouth in Theory
. t based curriculum brought students metaphors used for privileged students' ignorance of injustice (e.g., "sheltered",
outh in theorizing about how _her plroJelc- of people native to the region. "in a bubble"), hers is one of my favorites. She says that privileged indi viduals
Y · with a oca group ·
into J. oint cultural pro d uct1on . d . I ·n Rctl1i11kin.J? Sc/,o()/srcflccung (who are privileged, she notes, whether they admit to it or not) have worldviews
I ubhshe aruc es i d
Additionally' teachers iavc p . I ffiuent and suburban stu ents that "eaj_stin protected cocoons" (p. 74). What I like mo st about this is the hope
. I . . pedagogy wit 1 a
on their attempts at socia JUsuce that is embedded within it; one is meant to emerge from a cocoon as a stronger
(e.g., Frewing, 2001; Staples'. 2~05). • oints to three common reactions of and wiser, transformed being meant for broader horizons.
When read together, dus hteratun: ~ 1 . . . d~gogy First though they When it comes to thinking about privileged students' capacity to be aware of
d to soc1a JUSt1ccpe .. . '
privileged children when expose ld . ·teged students are likely to frame injustice, Leonardo (2009) quite helpfully distinguishes between racial undcrstat1d-
may well \cam of injustices in the wor 'dpnvp1unawareness of their root causes. ing and racial knowledge,claiming that most Whites have little of the former and a
d demonstrate a ee l . '
these issues as ab stract an to feel empowered by eammg lot of the latter. This distinction holds for other fonns of privilege as well: stu-
. 1· d cudents may come db
Second, whereas margina ize . s. d likely to feel overwhelme y dents from wealthy fumilies, for example, certainly know that poverty exists, but
. pnv1leged stu ents are . . .
about systemic oppression,_ Tl . d '[students choose to paruc1pate m their understanding of how poverty and wealth are intertwined and experienced
guilt or anger and resist tlus pedagogy. ur ' • . I . tice pedagogy' privileged
f heir exposure to soc1a JUS I
is likely to be weak at best. Knowledge about injustice can help students keep an
social action as a result o t . h r. e themselves as savior figures w 10 abstract, impersonal distance from oppression; it is something that happened "back
'k ct m ways t at 1ram d.
students arc more l• eIy to a . . rficial way. Instead of expan mg then" or "over there" to "them." Underst:inding, on the other hand, requires
. .. " · a patrontzmg or supc . ·
help a deficit Ot 1ier m d ·n=mng them m acnon as empathy and a willingness to implicate oneselfin the issue at had--a much more
. . ng them to act, an c .,-.,- • .al
their worldv1ew, empowen 1· ult'i1natcly wams of the potcnu difficult t:isk. When exposed to social justice pedagogy, privileged students, then,
I pe the iterature ll ·
social justice pedagogues to . ' . ·1 d students to backfire. What fo ows is are likely to focus on knowledge of injustice rather than understanding its root
•_1 •
for soc1ai • •
JUst1cc pc•dagogy with pnvi ege . d ·d consequences ·m t c•n11sof causes and connections to their lives (Howard, 2008) as it is "often easier to
. . f each of these umntcn c
a deeper exanunauon o . deplore [oppression] and its effects than to take responsibility for the privilege
awareness, empowennent, and action. some of us receive as a result of it" (Rothenberg, 2002, p. 1).
Even if teachers (or parents) set out to challenge this conception by engaging
in social justice pedagogy, privileged students may still find ways to "capitalize"
Awareness .. f privilege will have ha muc
d h on knowledge of injustice as a way to increase their marketability (Goodman,
lt is unlikely that students from commumuesl o ·111011ic content at the heart of 2000a). A student may integrate their new knowledge about "diversity" as a way
explicit exposure in their ives o
• r t the counter - 1ege
f living it every day. Because to write a much more attractive college essay, for example, or leverage required
. . I ugh they arc, o course, •di
social JUsnce pedagogy, t to b b" messages through exposure to me a, community-service hours in order to gain entrance into more competitive
. . -1 "I d" by a sor mg . ··
Privilege is pnman . y • c:earne oplc .m their . li . d growing up m conunumues universities. Though her study does not focus on privileged students, North
ves, an b
interactions with s1g1U11cant pc . r. l privileged youth tend to e (2009) expresses great concern for (and not a little frustration with) these students
I d11fcrentlrom t tem, 6)
physically isolated from peo~ e . . o them (Demian-Sparks & Rams ey' 200 . who incorporate their new critical literacy into what Lareau (2003) calls a
sheltered by forces rendered mv1S1ble_ t ge of all: to preserve an aura "repeated performance of entitled selves" or Khan's (2011) "ease" of the new elite
. h ost unportant messa ali
Included in their lessons is t ~ 1~1 Tl . ... . 'b1'lizing" need not be of m - that continues to legitimate the social order. Ultimately, she worries that "teaching
I . v1leges us mv1s1
of inevitability about t ietr pn . ?007) <,For example, it is not uncmn- students the rules of a social system that already benefits them could have the
r. • (Curry-Stevens, - · p II k unintentional effect of strengthening that very system" (p. 126). Social justice
cious intent to rnnctton . ki • 1· ·t1y about race- what o oc
. I· . v01d cal. ng exp ict . .
mon for Wlute peop e to a " . uch situations, however, is playmg a educators in communities of privilege thus face a difficult challenge as they
(2004) calls being "colonn~te : . Race• n.1s . ·t" 1ever comes up" simply bcc:1use struggle against norms of competitive individualism that encourage such inter-
. I as an mvtS1blepresence, I '
deeply unportant ro e · · ·rrelevant pret:itions of their pedagogy (Goodman, 2000b).
. .di · - not because tt ts 1 • . • • •
people are actively avo1 ng It I re roduction of incquahues, it IS
When privileged people do challenge t 1el . p. to be "color blind" rather
I - ds (e g c amung Empowerment
often only when it serves t ieir n~e I .. iives and the ways in which they arc
than critically reflecting on ~ace mft tel~ cial structures) (Hurtado, t 996; Because social justice pedagogy asks teachers to expose privileged children to
. . . I production o racist so d ell~
comphc1t 111 t 1e re I 'd ·~ that ignorance an :1war perspectives that often challenge the status quo, few expect these students to jump
I · (1995) presents t 1e 1 c~ dy
Applebaum, 2010). D e p'.t. I• I . t "those with power arc frcquen on the social justice bandwagon as willingly as might those from marginalized
likely co-cXlst · wit· 1un · pnv1legcd peop c, t tad . • 'stence" (p. 24). of· aUthe groups. Rather than feel empowered by knowledge or understanding ofinj ustice,
. • (.-o r least willing to acknow\e ge--1ts cXl
1cast aware o
Disconnected, Paralyzed,and Charitable 27
26 The Educationof PrivilegedYouth in Theory
fi d angry or challenged (Rothenberg, disrupt oppression. As White studies scholar Tim Wise (2002) admits, "pri vilege
privileged students are lik~ly to fed_ con u~~) or deny complicity in the repro- tastes good and we're loath to relinquish it" (p. 108). With regards to race privilege ,
2002), immobilized by giult {Rodnguez, - ?00;) "This makes pedagogy for the Berlak and Moyenda (2001) claim that, ultimately, "White people are going to do
· fomu (Applebaum, - · ,, c rry- what th~ damn well please" (p. 136). Hernandez-Sheets (2000) notes that , " the
duction of oppressive . eda o of the oppressed, says u
privileged significandy d1ffer~nt fr~m ~ a~t ~ dear and direct and the process
Stevens (2007), "where the h:era;:~:
typically marked by ease·a~d reel
~:x relatively unscathed by resistance ~nd
that this fom1 of change engenders resist-
.
connection from the process of White racial identity development that potentiall y
creates change agents committed to social action to effective pedagogy, is unclear ,
undocumented, and unrealistic" (p. 19). In fact, attention to race may encourage
denial. We need to renun ourse ves tion with students' opposition to these White students to "create solidarity" in their racial identity rather than w ork to
ance" (p. 41). A not-so-subtle frustra_ . . students from dominant groups rearticulate it (Rodriguez, 2000). Privileged people are thus "politically unrelia-
. li ture pos1uonmg ·
changes abounds Ill t 11e tera . ' . h hich to attempt this work. Agam, a ble"; they may change their hearts and minds , but refuse to act on these changes
· populauon wit w · t:: to
as the most c hallengmg .. I n1ention here is not m re1crcnce either individually or colle ctively (Goodman, 2000b; Curry-Stevens, 2007 ).
. , , . the opposition d ·I For those privileged students who do choose to act, the literature is clear that
note about mdocmnauon. . b wltat ought to be one wit l
. d rspecuves a out I .
mdcnts' diverse an d vane pe they should do so as allieswith oppressed peoples' struggles rather than patroniz-
S • r ' with systems O oppreSSI. on ' but rather about t 1e1r
f
ing or colonizing saviors swooping in to aid the Other (Kivel, 2002; Ed wards,
regards to their comp 1c1ty I . k bout those issues at all.
.. b . asked to t un a difti l
otential oppos1oon to emg . l dose of realism about how icu t 2006). Privileged students can be valuable to social movements, especially with
P , . d however wit l a d l
Exasperation is tcmpere ' ' d l held worldviews an iow regards to their powerful fonns of capittl they can mobilize (Goodman, 2000b ;
· · ds about eep Y
it is for people to change t 11e_1rnun .h h e (Heinze, 2008). Resistance, Curry-Stevens, 2007). A conception of alliance rather than service can help focu s
ill cnce loss wit c ang ·
likely it is that they w expen . . al tl1e consequences for answenng attention on root causes of injustice and long-term solutions , For instance,
d nor ,rrauon as .
then is neither unexpecte . beliefs and practices have senous Wise (2002), urges people from all backgrounds to unite "against their common
' d ·ally adopung new . iki
new questions an pot.en~ also hi hlight the fact that we are tlm . ng . problem: the mostly white lawmakers who prioritize jails and slashing taxes on
implications for pe~ple s lives. ~:ust ildren ;om into poverty or to fumilies from the wealthy over meeting the needs of most people" (p. 109) rather than engage
bout privileged cl11/,lrc11, who, ecl . • by choice and have very in more superficial action addressing only the symptoms of injustice.
a . d come to such a posmon . K·
marmnahzed groups, o not . t::onns themselves (Dcrus-Mc ay, These alliances between the privileged and the oppressed, however, cannot
• .,. ., , ting oppressive •• . d l
little culpab1hty Ill pe~etua . called for. If the hope is that privilege peop e come at the expense of the oppressed. An ethos of charity is, frustratingly , a
2007). A bit of compassion here is . stl rivilege them, then any process perhaps well-intentioned but all-too common framework in the edu cation of
work to dismande the systenlS that unJU d y ~ lot of pain uncertainty' and grief privileged youth that frequently descends into a type of voyeurism or what
ki towards such ends is sure to engcn er a ' Hernandez-Sheets (2000) calls "helperi sm" which is "platitudinous and no lon ger
wor ng · cknowledge .
that educators would be wise to a brace social justice pedagogy, peers viable" for marginalized peoples (p. 19). Such an approach can be disruptive and
Even if privileged students choosedto em rage a resistant response. There is distracting when privileged students are briefly dropped into an organization
cem an encou l
and families may express con . . • w1·thin their communities for peop e when what is most needed from them is financial support or a comminnent to
. ort onncenuvc . . ·al
likely little opportunity, supp ' I I . ' dentity and cxanune its soc1 build long-term relationships with a movement over time. Such shallow fonns of
· · lly exp ore t 1e1r I k
from dominant groups to cnnca . . l su ortive students may thus revert bac service learning can obscure underlying causes ofinjustice, rcify privileged norms,
implications (Goodman , 2000b). lrunal y PP d by examining themselves and excuse privileged students from critically reflecting on their lives, and reprodu ce
. d " ti e fear ge nerate
to their "original bhn ncss as l . l I . soci·at networks appears coo great a false sense of"Us " and "Them" (Burin, 2007; Choules, 2007).
. · hips wit 1 t 1e1r
the risk of damagmg re 1anons . l . l the literJturc that students can To avoid this trap, scholars advise privileg ed people to become involved in
(Heinze, 2008). Ultimately , the.re so~1e
o embrace social JUSUCCpc g
I~ 10:: i:gy with a patient , supportive social movements not simply to help others but in order to liberate themsel ves
b e persua ded t (Denis-M cKay, 2007; Wise, 2008). Th ose who focus on " humanization" warn
teacher at the helm . against demonizing or punishing the privileged , focusing instead on how their
privilege can be mobilized to help abolish oppressive structures and conditions
(Goodman, 2000b; Hein ze, 2008). Though focusing such attention on privileged
Action hcther .. b children may "re-center " them at the expense of marginalized youth (Hernande z-
. tli• a heJlthy dose ofskepnc1sm a out w
-
Along with hope , the hterature ~ _ers d l 's worldvicws is actually poss1b~: Sheets, 2000; Curry-Stevens, 2007), addressing a pedagogy of privileged students
· f pnvile gc pcop e WJII
or not the transfonnauon o . l l d tl1en1 to act in ways that rooted in an "analytics of the oppressed" is markedly different than the historic
l l will ulmnatc y ca
and whether or not sue l c ,ange
28 The Educationof PrivilegedYouth in Theory
The sand-bank was very useful to our coolies for bathing from,
and was also turned to account by the women who came to our
market for doing their washing. The deck of the Davoust became the
rendezvous of everybody, and no doubt some strange episodes took
place on and in the stranded vessel. The flesh is weak, and it was
perhaps as well that the chaplain of the mission and his aide-de-
camp, Baudry, who had charge of the police department, did not
inquire too closely into what went on in the siesta hour.
May 18.—No storm at Fort Archinard, though it is pouring with
rain all round. One would really suppose that we had a grisgris or a
fetich which enabled us to control the elements.
Three men came from Galadio to ask us to send him the treaty
already alluded to. We gave them two copies of it, one of which was
to be returned to us after being signed by Ibrahim if he approved of
it. This treaty was a league of friendship between the French and
him, agreeing to give mutual aid and protection throughout the whole
of the districts subject to him or to the French to all who came in
peace, whether as travellers or traders, whether actually the
subjects, or only aliens under the protection of either of the
contracting parties. Under all circumstances, in fact, and by every
means in their power, Galadio and the French agreed to assist each
other. Both would do their very utmost to make the road between Uro
Galadio and Massina safe. Lastly, Ibrahim promised to make no
agreement with any other European without having first consulted
the French resident at Bandiagara.
Later the duplicate of this convention came back to us signed in
beautifully clear and firm Arabic writing, after having been read and
discussed at a general meeting of native notables. This valuable
treaty had not been obtained by lavish presents, for we had already
begun to practise economy, in view of the probable heavy expenses
of the return journey, and we had warned Ibrahim that he must not
expect costly gifts.
The convention was simple, direct, and easy to be understood by
all. It was in my opinion the most complete treaty which could
possibly be drawn up in these parts, and after its signature we had a
right to rely upon the absolute good faith of the other party to the
contract, and to consider him our friend and our ally. You will see
presently how much it was worth, and judge from that of the value of
all treaties with negro chiefs, especially of those left with them, the
contents of which have never been explained.
Another great piece of news! A Messiah has risen up, by name
Bokar Ahmidu Collado, who is winning converts on the Liptako to the
west of our encampment, between Say and Bandiagara. He has
already had considerable success, and has received investiture from
Sokoto with a banner, giving him the right to make war on the
French. He went to Amadu Cheiku to ask for reinforcements, but that
chief only gave him his blessing in a very frigid manner, saying,
“Believe me, the time will come, but it is not yet come, for driving the
white men from the Sudan, the land of our fathers. There is a country
in the East bounded by a big creek (the Tchad?), and they must
spread there first. As for me, I know the French too well to care to
rub shoulders with them.”
Bokar Ahmidu Collado then went to Niugui, chief of the Cheibatan
Tuaregs, and asked him to give him some men, but Niugui said to
him, “Madidu will make war on me if I help against his friends the
French.” “You have no faith,” answered the Messiah; “I will make you
believe,” and he gave him a consecrated drink. Then they say Niugui
saw, in the air above him, crowds of combatants armed with rifles
and swords, with many mounted men, all following the Messiah and
the triumphant Crescent. He still hesitates, however, on account of
his salutary fear of Madidu.
Bokar Ahmidu Collado comes from a village of Farimaké, near
Tioko. One of Galadio’s people from Wagniaka (Massina) knew him
when he was quite young. “A poor fool that Collado,” he said to us,
“who has not even been to Mecca, yet sets up for being a Messiah!”
Moral: No man is a prophet in his own country.
Something special seemed to be going on all through the latter
part of May; all manner of news pouring in, some of it really seeming
very likely to be true. The barges at Ansongo constantly increased in
number. The Toucouleur chief Koly Mody was about to abandon the
cause of Amadu. Diafara, a man from Kunari, which had remained
true to Agibu, was on the west of our camp to levy tribute in
Hombari, to found a post at Dori, or to lead a very strong force of
French and their allies into the district of Mossi. The people of
Bussuma had been defeated and driven away, they had taken refuge
at Wagadugu, which last-named rumour seemed to us most likely to
be true, for it behoved the French Sudan to avenge the injury
inflicted on French troops the previous year by the so-called Naba of
the Nabas. What, however, were we to think of all the contradictory
rumours which sprung up like mushrooms and grew like snowballs,
to melt away almost as quickly as they took shape?
May 20.—A new visitor to-day, original if nothing more. Like every
one else, he has his budget of news, and told us about the French
column which is to operate in Mossi. We are beginning to attach very
little importance to all this gossip. Our guest is a heathen, or, as
Suleyman translates it, a Christian, explaining that he must be a co-
religionist of ours, in that he has customs peculiar to the Christians—
drinks dolo and gets drunk on it, of which he is very proud. He
therefore belongs to our family, and that is why he has come to see
his big brother, the commandant!
He calls himself a sorcerer, and seems a little off his head.
Anyhow he talks great nonsense. Whilst we were questioning him he
kept fingering a little goat-skin bag, out of which, when we were quite
weary of his stupid replies, he drew a small phial full of oil of
pimento, and a number of tiny little pots—the whole paraphernalia of
magic, in fact. Having set out all these odds and ends on the ground,
he proceeded to make some grisgris to protect the hut in which he
was from bullets.
He began by smoothing the sand of the floor with his hand, to
bring good-fortune, he said, and he then skilfully drew with his finger
in the sand four parallel lines forming parallelograms. These he
combined two by two, three by three, four by four, and so on, reciting
invocations all the time. He then rubbed all the first designs out and
began again with fresh invocations, making the lines sometimes
vertical, sometimes of other shapes.
With a very solemn face, as if he
were celebrating mass, he now drew
forth a little satchel of ancient paper,
written all over in Arabic by some
marabout, and muttered some words,
evidently learnt by heart, for he
certainly could not read. At last, with
an expression as serious as that of
the Sphinx of the desert, he
TYPICAL MARKET WOMEN. announced: “Hitherto you have had
none but enemies in the land, no one
in the whole country is your friend. Beware of the marabouts!
Beware, above all, of one particular marabout! There is a young man
ill here (this was Bluzet, who was just then lying down with an attack
of fever), but it will not be much. You must sacrifice a white chicken
for his recovery; have it broiled, and give it to the poor: this will
conciliate the favour of the great prophet Nabi Mussa, or Moses. It
will be best to give your charity to children. Then all the grisgris of
the negroes and the marabouts will avail nothing against you. But
beware, above all, on account of your men. If you cut away all the
roots of a tree it falls. In the same way, if they take away your
negroes, all will be over with you. Now I have come to give you a
grisgris for them, which will protect them from all spells, and even
from cortés and other evils. I can even give you a corté myself,
which will kill a man if you only throw the tiniest bit of it in his face.”
The corté is, in fact, the most terrible of all spells amongst the
negroes. It is said to consist of a powder which slays from a
distance. The natives say that if thrown from some miles off the man
it touches dies, and the truth seems to be, that the sorcerers have
the secret of a very subtle poison, which produces terrible disorders
in those touched by it.
As a matter of course, we did not accept the offers of a corté or
counter corté from Djula, but to give him an idea of the mischief we
could do if we chose, I gave him a five-franc piece in a bowl of
galvanized water, as I had the son of the chief of the Kel Temulai. I
then told him to go to Mossi and have a look round there to see what
would happen. He is a crazy old fellow enough, but I have been told
that sorcerers have more influence over the Mossi and their nabas,
as they call their chiefs, than those who are in the full possession of
their senses. He was willing to go, and when the Tabaski was over
he would come back inch Allah, with envoys from Bilinga or
Wagadugu.
Now Bilinga is eleven days’ march from Say, and eight days after
he left us the old fellow came back pretending he had gone all the
way. He had really never gone beyond Say, and brought us all sorts
of silly news only, so Digui took him by the shoulders and quite
gently turned him out of the camp.
May 20.—As the so-called Tabaski fête approached, our visitors
and the news they brought were greatly on the increase. Pullo,
Osman, and the minor ambassadors vied with each other in the
ingenuity of their inventions. The fact was, they all wanted to have
new bubus for the festive occasion, some money, some coppers to
buy kola nuts, etc., not to speak of new bright-coloured
undergarments for their wives. “What would the village people say,
commandant,” they would urge, “if I, who every one knows to be a
friend of the French, should cut anything but a good figure?”
All, then, was tending in the direction of our hopes. A good job
too, for the river was falling, falling, falling. Our island was completely
transformed, for a big isthmus of sand and flints now united it to the
right bank. Hundreds of determined men, or of men driven in from
behind, might pour into the camp any night now, as into some
popular fair.
Reassured though we were by what we heard of the political
condition of the country, and by all these protestations of friendship,
we yet awaited the 14th July with impatience, and we celebrated its
passing as joyfully as possible when it came at last. No sooner was it
over, however, when slowly and quietly, and at first very doubtfully,
certain bad news filtered through, which gradually gained certainty.
For once, indeed, there was no doubt about the evil tidings, which
were diametrically opposed to all that the politeness of the natives
would have had us believe. The whole country, Toucouleurs, people
of Say, of Kibtachi, and of Torodi, with the Sidibés, the Gaberos and
others, had combined against us and were marching to attack us.
Naturally no one had thought fit to warn us. It was Osman, poor
fellow, who, in spite of himself, put us on the scent, and gave us the
alarm. He meant to play the part of an angel of light, but, as is often
the case, his rôle was really quite the reverse.
One fine day he said to us point-blank, “There is no cause for
anxiety now, you can sleep with both ears shut, for Amadu Saturu
and Amadu Cheiku are both most favourably disposed towards you.”
“Why do you tell us that, Osman?” I asked. “I feel sure you have
some very good reason, but take care what you say. You are lying, I
know. Amadu is really trying to pick a quarrel with us.”
“Bissimilaye! not a bit of it,” was the reply. “He is only getting his
column together to move against Djermakoy.”
I had never been told a word about that expedition, and the fact
seemed strange, so I said—
“Osman! you are telling a lie. What column is going against
Djermakoy?”
Then with much hesitation, and turning as pale as a negro can
when he has got himself into a hobble, he began to tell us how all
the people of Say, and the Toucouleurs, in fact, all the natives, had
united to march on Dentchendu, a big village of Djerma, the very
centre of the Futanké agitation, but that before actually starting they
were all coming to Say to receive the benediction of Saturu, who
would recite the Fatiha to the glory of the Prophet on the tomb of his
ancestor, Mohammed Djebbo, who had founded the town.
FORT ARCHINARD.