Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Leaders and Leadership in Serbian Primary Schools Perspectives Across Two Worlds Jelena Rakovic Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Leaders and Leadership in Serbian Primary Schools Perspectives Across Two Worlds Jelena Rakovic Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/global-citizenship-education-in-
australian-schools-leadership-teacher-and-student-
perspectives-1st-edition-andrew-peterson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/trilingual-education-in-hong-
kong-primary-schools-lixun-wang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/instructional-leadership-and-
leadership-for-learning-in-schools-understanding-theories-of-
leading-tony-townsend/
https://textbookfull.com/product/arabs-and-jews-in-ottoman-
palestine-two-worlds-collide-2019-alan-dowty/
Future Learning in Primary Schools A Singapore
Perspective Ching Sing Chai
https://textbookfull.com/product/future-learning-in-primary-
schools-a-singapore-perspective-ching-sing-chai/
https://textbookfull.com/product/systems-thinking-for-school-
leaders-holistic-leadership-for-excellence-in-education-haim-
shaked/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lessons-in-library-leadership-a-
primer-for-library-managers-and-unit-leaders-1st-edition-
halaychik/
https://textbookfull.com/product/serbian-dreambook-serbian-
dreambook-national-imaginary-in-the-time-of-miloaevia-national-
imaginary-in-the-time-of-miloaevia-marko-zivkovic/
https://textbookfull.com/product/servant-leaders-in-training-
foundations-of-the-philosophy-of-servant-leadership-john-henry-
horsman/
6ÊÉ;É%+"÷
Tom O’Donoghue
and Simon Clarke
LEADERS AND
LEADERSHIP IN
SERBIAN PRIMARY
SCHOOLS
Perspectives Across
Two Worlds
Leaders and Leadership in Serbian
Primary Schools
Jelena Raković · Tom O’Donoghue
Simon Clarke
Leaders and
Leadership in Serbian
Primary Schools
Perspectives Across Two Worlds
Jelena Raković Simon Clarke
Graduate School of Education Graduate School of Education
The University of Western Australia The University of Western Australia
Crawley, WA, Australia Perth, WA, Australia
Tom O’Donoghue
Graduate School of Education
The University of Western Australia
Crawley, WA, Australia
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2019
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse
of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by
similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt
from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein
or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Contents
1 Introduction 1
v
vi Contents
References 209
Index 221
Abbreviations
vii
1
Introduction
Introduction
Globalisation of the world economy has led to the globalisation of
knowledge, thus blurring the boundaries between local and national
levels in many education systems, including in Serbia, which has
been in economic regression for some time (Arar, Turan, Barakat, &
Oplatka, 2017). Concurrently, school leadership has been identi-
fied as potentially being a major force in promoting education change
as transnational education policy transfer is taking place, led by such
agencies as the European Union (EU), the Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the World Bank (Hall,
Møller, Schratz, & Serpieri, 2017). However, as these international
organisations are usually concerned primarily with aiming for vibrant
economies, they often promote a culture of training rather than one
of education (White, Cooper, & Anwaruddin, 2017). Consequently,
much contemporary education change is based on ‘new public man-
agement’ (NPM) ideas, including reducing public expenses and
bureaucracy, encouraging competition, promoting marketisation, and
measuring outcomes (Hall et al., 2017).
doing the same things, but to start calling them something different
(Mincu, 2009).
A related issue can be the promotion of the interests of the most
powerful in the society. Following this, popular disenchantment can
emerge from the democratisation process. This brings to mind the
view that what has previously been defined as right and wrong within
a society may now become blurred and the individual may not have
clear social rules to follow (Hughes, Martin, & Sharrock, 2003; Pratto,
Žeželj, Maloku, Turjačanin, & Branković, 2017). Also, individuals can
cease being aware of each other’s interdependence when there is no effi-
cient mechanism in a society to ensure solidarity (Hughes et al., 2003;
Pratto et al., 2017). Such a situation can occur when there is a rapid
transition from a mechanical (uniform, with a common conscience) to
an organic (complex division of labour, needs moral regulation) society
(Hughes et al., 2003). In this regard, the process of democratisation in
the post-Yugoslav context demanded that there be a transition period
between that of the more mechanical communist society and that of
one with the organic qualities of democracy (Škorić & Bešlin, 2017).
As far back as the 1990s, the population in Serbia became aware that
circumstances had irreversibly changed. Furthermore, the changes con-
tinued after 2000. The hope was that the period of immature capital-
ism would end and that a new ‘normalcy’ would be reached (Kojanić,
2015). This however, has not eventuated. Rather, in the ‘immature
capitalism’ phase that persists, the institutions of the socialist state have
disappeared, while new institutions of neoliberal governmentality have
only just begun to emerge. Thus, owing to the high levels of uncertainty
and structural corruption, the individual’s capacity for decision-mak-
ing is restricted (Kojanić, 2015; Pratto et al., 2017). Spasić (2012) has
argued that the communist system in Serbia supported individuals in
the making of decisions autonomously on their life goals and on see-
ing them through. Not surprisingly, then, there is currently a nostalgia
being expressed that is rooted in a memory of hope that, it is held, used
to be abundant and is now lost (Spasić, 2012). The point of some is that
while communism can be seen in other European countries as having
been a dictatorship, people in Yugoslavia, the ‘ordinary people’, did not
1 Introduction
7
seem to mind the fact that they only had a single party for which they
could vote. Politics at the time, some hold, gave them peaceful lives,
unlike later on (Petrović & Hofman, 2017; Spasić, 2012).
Nowadays, Serbia’s population is ageing and is shrinking at a rate
of 0.5% per year. Also, healthcare, education, construction and spa-
tial planning, infrastructure projects, and the privatisation of public
enterprises still remain particularly vulnerable to corruption (European
Commission, 2016). Furthermore, from the time when the population
initially started to decline, school principals began to agitate to main-
tain the largest possible number of classes in their schools in order to
keep them running. This meant that any existing funds, rather than
being invested in development, were spent in trying to keep the largest
possible number of staff employed (Ministry of Education, 2012).
Some development funds have been provided by the EU, mostly
in the areas of public administration change, justice and home affairs,
competitiveness, education, and energy (Börzel & Grimm, 2018;
European Commission, 2016). Specifically in relation to education,
the implementation of an education action plan is progressing, albeit
with delays. Also, in 2016, it was concluded that additional investment
in education was badly needed at pre-school and basic education levels
(European Commission, 2016).
Serbia itself spends 95% of its budget for education on salaries. The
funding system is a dual one, meaning that the central government is
responsible for covering the salaries, whereas the local government is
meant to be involved in dealing with other investments and expenses.
However, there are not sufficient means at the local level to fund any
development projects, especially in poor communities (Ministry of
Education, 2012). Also, differences between individual schools are
emerging in terms of funding received, and, as a result, in the success
levels of students. The proposed solution has been to develop net-
works of schools, monitor data centrally, and fund schools based on
the number of students in attendance (Ministry of Education, 2012).
This means that those schools which could not justify having a certain
number of teachers in relation to the numbers of students on their rolls,
would have to close.
8 J. Raković et al.
References
Alam, S. (2017). A study on leadership styles executed by principal and
academic coordinator in one of the private schools in Gilgit-Baltistan,
Pakistan. Academic Research International, 8(3), 91–99.
Alexiadou, N. (2014). Policy learning and Europeanisation in education:
The governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge. In A. Nordin &
D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational policy flows in European education: The
making and governing of knowledge in the education policy field (pp. 123–
140). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Anderson, G. L., & López, A. (2017). Resisting and reclaiming the global
discourse of leadership. In D. Waite & I. Bogotch (Eds.), The Wiley inter-
national handbook of educational leadership (pp. 157–174). Hoboken, NJ:
Wiley.
Arar, K., Turan, S., Barakat, M., & Oplatka, I. (2017). The characteristics of
educational leadership in the Middle East: A comparative analysis of three
nation-states. In D. Waite & I. Bogotch (Eds.), The Wiley international
handbook of educational leadership (pp. 355–373). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal
imaginary. London: Routledge.
Bideleux, R., & Jeffries, I. (2007a). The Balkans: A post-Communist history.
New York: Routledge.
Bideleux, R., & Jeffries, I. (2007b). A history of Eastern Europe: Crisis and
change (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
16 J. Raković et al.
Birks, M. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Blackmore, J. (2016). Educational leadership and Nancy Fraser. London:
Routledge.
Blackmore, J. (2017). Rethinking gender and socially just leadership in
the sociospatialized context(s) of global Edu-Capitalism. In D. Waite &
I. Bogotch (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of educational leadership
(pp. 79–102). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Boeckh, K., & Rutar, S. (2017). The Balkan wars from contemporary perception
to historic memory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Börzel, T. A., & Grimm, S. (2018). Building good (enough) governance
in postconflict societies and areas of limited statehood: The European
Union and the Western Balkans. Daedalus, 147(1), 116–127. https://doi.
org/10.1162/DAED_a_00478.
Bryant, A. (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.
Bush, T. (2012). International perspectives on leadership development:
Making a difference. Professional Development in Education, 38(4),
663–678.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through
qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
Charon, J. M. (2001). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpreta-
tion, an integration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Clarke, S., & O’Donoghue, T. A. (2013a). The case for studying educa-
tional leadership at the individual school level in post-conflict societies. In
S. R. P. Clarke & T. A. O’Donoghue (Eds.), School level leadership in
post-conflict societies: The importance of context. London: Routledge.
Clarke, S., & O’Donoghue, T. A. (2013b). Educational leadership in post-new
war societies: Insights from the field into challenges and possibilities. In
S. R. P. Clarke & T. A. O’Donoghue (Eds.), School level leadership in
post-conflict societies: The importance of context. London: Routledge.
Clarke, S., & Wildy, H. (2009). The Europeanisation of educational leader-
ship: Much ado about nothing? European Educational Research Journal,
8(3), 352–358.
Corbin, J. M. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures
for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among
five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
1 Introduction
17
Dahiru, A. S., Pihie, Z. A. L., Basri, R., & Hassan, S. A. (2017). Mediating
effect of teacher empowerment between entrepreneurial leadership and
school effectiveness. The Social Sciences, 12(11), 2077–2084.
European Commission (EU). (2016). Serbia 2016 report: Communication on
EU enlargement policy. Brussels: European Commission.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Fullan, M. (2014). Leading in a culture of change: Personal action guide and
workbook. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Glenny, M. (2014). The Balkans, 1804–2012: Nationalism, war and the great
powers. Toronto, ON: House of Anansi Press.
Gunter, H. M., & Fitzgerald, T. (2013). New Public Management and the mod-
ernisation of education systems 1. London: Taylor & Francis.
Hall, D., Møller, J., Schratz, M., & Serpieri, R. (2017). From Welfarism to
neo-liberalism: Conceptualizing the diversity in leadership models in
Europe. In D. Waite & I. Bogotch (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook
of educational leadership (pp. 311–334). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Hermann, C. (2007). Neoliberalism in the European Union. Studies in
Political Economy, 79(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2007.1
1675092.
Hess, F. M. (2013). Cage-busting leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
Education Press.
Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2018). The practice of qualitative research
(2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Hughes, J., Martin, P. J., & Sharrock, W. (2003). Understanding classical
sociology: Marx, Weber, Durkheim (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, lifelong learning and the learning society:
Sociological perspectives. London: Routledge.
Kojanić, O. (2015). Nostalgia as a practice of the self in post-socialist Serbia.
Canadian Slavonic Papers, 57(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006
.2015.1090760.
Mincu, M. E. (2009). Myth, rhetoric, and ideology in Eastern European
education. European Education, 41(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.2753/
EUE1056-4934410103.
18 J. Raković et al.
Introduction
The study of Serbian primary school principals’ perspectives on their
work, which is reported later, sits within the broad context of the
Republic of Serbia as a post-communist and post-conflict country. The
legacies of Yugoslav socialism, the Balkan conflicts of the 1990s, and
the contemporary transition towards democracy that is taking place
have shaped, and continue to shape, the education system in the nation.
As a result, any understanding of the perspectives of school principals
necessitates an understanding of this context.
In light of what has been said above, relevant historical and contem-
porary issues associated with societal and education developments in
Serbia are discussed in this chapter. First, an overview of key historical
and political developments is presented. This is followed by an account
of education changes that have taken place as a result of the introduc-
tion of contemporary democratisation practices. Next, the most prom-
inent governance initiatives that have been taken in relation to the
development of Serbia’s education system are outlined. An exposition
on the latest developments in relation to the nation’s education policy
Historical Developments
This section presents an overview of key historical and political develop-
ments that provide the background to the most recent stages in the his-
torical development of Serbia, namely, the period of Yugoslav socialism
(1945–1991), the period of the conflicts of the 1990s, and the period of
democratisation of the country from 2000 onwards. Specifically regard-
ing the latter, in moving from socialism to democracy the centralising
influence of the communist government was replaced by a democratic,
decentralising one (Boeckh & Rutar, 2017).
The historical, geographical, and political context of the Balkan
region predisposed it to the adoption of strong centralising power struc-
tures. Throughout much of its complicated history, the area was under
the control of various multinational empires, including the Roman
Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the Ottoman Empire
(Kolev, 2017). The centralising and dominating bureaucratic control of
these empires slowed down the development of capitalism (Reynolds,
2000). Vertical power structures were perpetuated by them, manifest-
ing in the desire for a state that would provide social security as well
as opportunity for engaging in corruption and the abuse of power
(Bideleux & Jeffries, 2007b).
Also, in the territory of former Yugoslavia, three religions formed
the basis for creating different ethnic identities amongst a population
sharing a common language and origin. Initially, when the South Slav
tribes inhabited it in the seventh century, those from the west embraced
the Catholic religion and the Latin alphabet from the Roman Church,
while those from the east adopted Orthodox religious teachings and
the Cyrillic alphabet from the Byzantine Church (Bideleux & Jeffries,
2007b; Glenny, 2014). Later on, this religious division brought about
the divide of the South Slavs into those with Serbian and those with
2 Overview of the Context
23