Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Inequalities in Creative Cities Issues Approaches Comparisons 1St Edition Ulrike Gerhard Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Inequalities in Creative Cities Issues Approaches Comparisons 1St Edition Ulrike Gerhard Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/re-imagining-creative-cities-in-
twenty-first-century-asia-xin-gu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/script-development-critical-
approaches-creative-practices-international-perspectives-batty/
https://textbookfull.com/product/teaching-general-music-
approaches-issues-and-viewpoints-1st-edition-carlos-r-abril/
The Role of Sharing Mobility in Contemporary Cities
Legal Social and Environmental Issues Guido Smorto
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-role-of-sharing-mobility-in-
contemporary-cities-legal-social-and-environmental-issues-guido-
smorto/
https://textbookfull.com/product/implementing-climate-change-
adaptation-in-cities-and-communities-integrating-strategies-and-
educational-approaches-1st-edition-walter-leal-filho/
https://textbookfull.com/product/interdisciplinarity-in-
translation-studies-theoretical-models-creative-approaches-and-
applied-methods-ana-maria-rojo-lopez/
https://textbookfull.com/product/environmental-management-in-ski-
areas-ulrike-probstl-haider/
https://textbookfull.com/product/educational-research-
contemporary-issues-and-practical-approaches-2nd-edition-jerry-
wellington/
INEQUALITIES
IN CREATIVE CITIES
ISSUES,
APPROACHES,
COMPARISONS
EDITED BY ULRIKE GERHARD,
MICHAEL HOELSCHER, AND DAVID WILSON
Inequalities in Creative Cities
Ulrike Gerhard • Michael Hoelscher • David Wilson
Editors
Inequalities in
Creative Cities
Issues, Approaches, Comparisons
Editors
Ulrike Gerhard Michael Hoelscher
Geographisches Institut Deutsche Universität für
Universität Heidelberg Verwaltungswissenschaften
Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Speyer, Germany
Germany
David Wilson
University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign
Champaign, Illinois, USA
v
vi AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES
the University of Freiburg and received his doctorate 2003 at the University
of Würzburg, for which he received in 2005 the Prize of the Austrian
Geographical Society. From 2004 to 2010 he qualified as a post-doctoral
fellow at the University of Passau and finalized in 2011 his habilitation on
the reproduction of urban inequality in Salvador da Bahia (Brazil). In
2010, he received the ‘Award for good teaching’ of the Bavarian State
Minister for Science, Research and the Arts. Between 2011 and 2012, he
represented the chair of Social Geography and Geographical Development
Research at the University of Bonn. His main areas of research focus on
urban inequality in the Global South, especially Brazil, critical theory and
intercultural hermeneutics. He is currently leading the European research
project SELFCITY on collective governance and urban self-organisation
in the face of climate change. Recent publications include inter alia
Exklusion im Zentrum. Die brasilianische Favela zwischen Stigmatisierung
und Widerständigkeit (2012), Urbane Ungleichheit in komparativer
Perspektive. Konzeptionelle Überlegungen und empirische Befunde aus den
Amerikas (Geographica Helvetica 2014; with Gerhard) and Urban Self-
organisation in the Global South: The Everyday Life of the Poor as a Collective
Resource to Enhance the Politics of Sustainability (in Wilson (ed.): The
Politics of the Urban Sustainability Concept. Champaign Common
Ground, 2015; with Korff).
David Wilson is Professor in the departments of Geography and
Geographical Information Sciences, Urban Planning, African American
Studies, and the Unit for Criticism and Interpretive Theory at the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He teaches and conducts
research on cities and urbanization in the USA and the Global West. His
most recent books are The Politics of the Urban Sustainability Concept
(2015, Common Ground), Urban Inequalities Across the Globe (2015,
Routledge) and Cities and Race: America’s New Black Ghettos (Routledge,
2007). He is currently completing a book on Chicago’s new gentrification
frontier and its invasion of blues clubs on the city’s South Side. Wilson has
sat on the editorial boards of Urban Geography, Social and Cultural
Geography, Professional Geographer, Acme: the Radical Geographical
Journal, International Journal of Spaces and Flows and Syracuse University
Press Series. In recent years, he has delivered keynote lectures at confer-
ences in the USA, Canada, Germany, England, Norway, China and Italy.
He is also the lead guitarist for the Urbana-Champaign-based blues band
the Painkillers.
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES xi
xiii
xiv Contents
11 Conclusion261
David Wilson, Ulrike Gerhard, and Michael Hoelscher
List of Figures
xv
xvi List of Figures
Fig. 9.4 Street market in the city center: Rurality in town. There,
small and local farmers could sale and trade their products,
which reached the market using mules or old cars for
transportation. The products prices were lower and
bargaining was common 232
Fig. 9.5 Inside the delicatessen: A symbol of urbanity. Also located
in the city center, the convenience store is well organized,
the products are industrialized, mostly of them from other states
or even imported, prices are fixed and people can pay 233
List of Tables
xvii
PART I
Cities across the globe toil mightily to transform in the elusive effort to
enhance their prosperity. The mantra of city governances is to bolster com-
petitiveness by becoming a more “creative” city. As cities find t hemselves
seared by the knowledge society, the creative class syndrome, and the cul-
tural and creative industries, this drive relentlessly makes and re-makes
urban space and socio-physical realities for people (Baycan-Levent 2010;
Knight 1995; Matthiesen 2004; Lever 2002). Yet, the full impacts and
consequences of this planning initiative have received at best scant treatment
from academics and planners. In short, we know little about how the
U. Gerhard (*)
Geography Department, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
M. Hoelscher
Higher Education and Science Management Department, Speyer University,
Speyer, Germany
D. Wilson
Geography and Geographic Information Science Department, University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
billion Euro) was higher than that of the automobile industry (55 billion
Euro) in 2009 (BMWi 2012: 21).
Key to these knowledge-intensive industries is a greater reliance on
intellectual capabilities that supplants physical inputs and natural resources
(Powell and Snellman 2004: 199). A “radically new system for creating
wealth has evolved that depends upon advanced education, research and
innovation, and hence upon knowledge-intensive organizations such as
research universities, corporate R&D laboratories and national research
agencies” (Duderstadt and Weber 2006: 282). These “intellectual capa-
bilities,” some authors claim, continue to concentrate in specific places.
Cities are not only historically information hubs, they are also cen-
tral spaces where knowledge is created, distributed, and used. Regional
wealth and the concentration of these industries are strongly correlated, as
empirical data for Europe show. “If we take into account no other factors,
regional creative and cultural specialization explains 60 % of the variance in
GDP per capita. Europe’s wealthiest regions are home to disproportionate
levels of creative and cultural industries concentration” (European Cluster
Observatory 2011: 8).
Different characteristics of cities foster the production of knowledge
and innovation, for example, their critical mass of people, their density,
and their heterogeneity (e.g., Howells 2002; Fischer 1975). While there
are many different types of knowledges produced in the city, the dom-
inant economic discourse reduces the notion of knowledge in the city
mostly to “human capital” as an essential input into production and con-
sumption. A question, however, remains: how significant is the impact of
knowledge industries for urban economic growth? How are they embed-
ded in the urban environment, thus contributing to its overall develop-
ment? Some researchers apply a comparative perspective to calculate the
significance of knowledge production within cities. Gabe et al. (2012), for
example, analyzed 287 US and Canadian metropolitan areas in relation
to their share of employment in knowledge-related industries, with the
help of a cluster analysis that extracted 11 different knowledge profiles
for city regions. They ranged from farming regions (high in food produc-
tion and m anufacturing), over making regions (very high in manufactur-
ing, very low in commerce and humanities), to thinking regions (high in
arts, humanities, IT, and commerce, low in manufacturing; examples are
Portland, Victoria, and Santa Cruz). Cities, where knowledge industries
played a significant role in the employment sector, qualified as thinking,
6 U. GERHARD ET AL.
turn bring with them (or create) innovative and successful firms. This con-
centration on cultural and creative industries and on this task for culture
in general goes along with—or even is a result of—a more general shift in
the concept of culture itself (see O’Connor 2010). It moves from culture
as an end in itself (“l’art pour l’art”) with its traditional dual task of educa-
tion and relaxation toward an economic stipulation or meaning of culture.
Thus, city planning and policies have been re-adjusted to produce what
is often called the “creative city”. Cities invest into new theatres and con-
cert halls (often designed by star architects) and support a great variety of
public events (from festivals to marathons and public viewing). Similarly,
new investment refurbishes waterfronts, public squares, and city halls.
The result: policies across diverse cities exhibit remarkably similar patterns
of public investment. What can be observed is a “policy borrowing” or
“policy mobility” by city administrations and governments, leading to
what neo-institutionalists would describe as “isomorphism” (DiMaggio
and Powell 1983). With this isomorphism, actors (without any authorita-
tive knowledge on what is really functional in complex systems) focus on
increasing legitimacy instead of functionality (Meyer and Rowan 1977).
This is made easily digestible as authors such as Florida (2002) and Landry
(2000) foster such legitimacy of action (Grodach and Silver 2012). What
becomes apparent here is the importance of narratives and discourses that
bind together specific concepts such as the creative city, stories about their
success, and certain actions.
Our Book
This book sheds light on the diverse forms of inequalities that follow from
the governance drive to forge creative cities focusing on a distinctive kind
of place: “ordinary cities”. This book offers complex and challenging
appraisals of the “drive to go creative”, recognizing that many cities across
the globe now find themselves struggling to generate wealth, tactical com-
petitive advantage, and social solidity as they cope in a world of neolib-
eral dominance. But all is not so simple and well known. Despite global
trends of retrenched government, rolled back welfare statism, stepped-
up economic privatization, and growing declarations and acceptances of
individualized causes for social processes, the production of inequalities
INTRODUCTION. INEQUALITIES IN THE CREATIVE CITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE... 9
The second part, featuring empirical case studies, begins with Linda
McDowell’s investigation of Oxford, UK. This analysis complements her
recent array of studies on the consequences of this city’s re-making for the
construction and marking of gender in local labor markets. David Wilson
follows with an investigation of racial inequalities in Cleveland, USA, and
Glasgow, UK. He has extensively examined such inequalities in US rust
belt cities. Ulrike Gerhard’s and Michael Hoelscher’s analysis of labor
market and housing inequalities in Heidelberg, Germany, comes next.
While Hoelscher is a sociologist with an interest in the knowledge sector
and cultural industries in Europe, Gerhard is an urban geographer who
had done substantive work on recent changes from urban restructuring
processes across European and American cities. David Giband’s chap-
ter focuses on the perplexing new inequalities that pervade Montpellier,
France, as its growth governance strives to creatively re-make the city,
connecting discourses of knowledge growth and sustainability. Giband has
done important research on dilemmas around social and ethnic heteroge-
neity of French cities. Justin Beaumont’s and Zemiattin Yildiz’s chapter
focuses on urban governance and politics in relation to social and spatial
justice in Groningen, The Netherlands. Beaumont has worked exten-
sively on the recent upsurge of housing struggles over problematic state-
funded provision in European cities.
Even though our case studies are already quite diverse, we cast our gaze
beyond the Global North. With two further chapters in a third part of the
book we look beyond the Western world, understanding urban inequali-
ties connected to knowledge growth as a global phenomenon or planetary
process. What does the case of Cachoeira, Brazil, contribute to the discus-
sion? We find here a specific urban growth strategy closely related to the cre-
ativity discourse. Eberhard Rothfuß and Wendel Henrique Baumgartner
are the two specialists on this perspective. Christiane Brosius contributes
another story of a city trying to become “world-class”: Delhi, India, is
restructuring its public space in order to be part of this global aspiration
process of going creative.
These authors all address different themes, underlined by their indi-
vidual research, that make up inequalities when cities are trying to go
creative. Thus, we can detect a new spatiality of urban inequality in the
appraised creative city. Urban inequality has not diminished, but is only
hidden behind the knowledge discourse. It is less pronounced, more sub-
tle, but at least as severe as in the past.
12 U. GERHARD ET AL.
Bibliography
Anheier, Helmut K., and Michael Hoelscher. 2015. Cultural Sustainability in
Small and Medium-Sized Cities. What Are the Issues? In Culture and
Sustainability in European Cities. Imagining Europolis, ed. Svetlana Hristova,
and Milena Dragićević Šešić, 17–31. Abingdon: Routledge.
Anheier, Helmut K., Yudhishthir Raj Isar, and Michael Hoelscher (ed). 2012.
Cities, Cultural Policy and Governance. London: Sage Publications.
Baycan-Levent, Tüzin. 2010. Diversity and Creativity as Seedbeds for Urban and
Regional Dynamics. European Planning Studies 18(4): 565–594.
BMWi (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie) and Michael
Söndermann. 2012. Monitoring zu ausgewählten wirtschaftlichen Eckdaten der
Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft 2010 . Berlin: BMWi. Langfassung
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited:
Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.
American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.
Duderstadt, James J., and Luc E. Weber. 2006. Universities and Business:
Partnering for the Knowledge Society. London: Economica.
European Cluster Observatory. 2011. Priority Sector Report: Creative and Cultural
Industries. Europa Innova Paper. Luxembourg: European Union.
Fainstein, Susan S. 2001. Inequality in Global City-Regions. In Global City-
Regions. Trends, Theory, Policy, ed. Allen J. Scott, 285–298. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Fischer, Claude S. 1975. Toward a Subcultural Theory of Urbanism. American
Journal of Sociology 80(6): 1319–1341.
Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It’s Transforming
Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
———. 2013. More Losers than Winners in America’s New Economic Geography. The
Atlantic City Lab, Jan 30, 2013. Available from http://www.citylab.com/
work/2013/01/more-losers-winners-americas-new-economic-geography/
4465/.
Friedmann, John. 1986. The World City Hypothesis. Development and Change
17: 69–83.
Gabe, Todd, Jaison Abel, Adrienne Ross, and Kevin Stolarick. 2012. Knowledge
in Cities. Urban Studies 49(6): 1179–1200.
Gerhard, Ulrike. 2004. Global Cities. Anmerkungen zu einem aktuellen
Forschungsfeld. Geographische Rundschau 56(4): 4–10.
Grodach, Carl, and Daniel Silver (ed). 2012. The Politics of Urban Cultural Policy:
Global Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Hamnett, Chris. 1994. Social Polarisation in Global Cities: Theory and Evidence.
Urban Studies 31(3): 401–424.
INTRODUCTION. INEQUALITIES IN THE CREATIVE CITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE... 13
Powell, Walter W., and Kaisa Snellman. 2004. The Knowledge Economy. Annual
Review of Sociology 30: 199–220.
Propris, Lisa de, Caroline Chapain, Philip Cooke, Stuart MacNeil, and Juan
Mateos-Garcia. 2009. The Geography of Creativity. Interim Report. London:
NESTA.
Robinson, Jennifer. 2010. Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture.
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(19): 1–23.
Sassen, Saskia. 2001 [1991]. The Global City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press.
Scott, Allen J. 2006. Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions.
Journal of Urban Affairs 28(1): 1–17.
———. 2008. Social Economy of the Metropolis. Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and
the Global Resurgence of Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Winden, Willem, Leo van den Berg, and Paul Pol. 2007. European Cities in
the Knowledge Economy: Towards a Typology. Urban Studies 44(3): 525–549.
Ward, Kevin. 2010. Towards a Relationale Comparative Approach to the Study of
Cities. Progress in Human Geography 34(4): 471–487.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
only two years of age, was rode at the battle of Preston Pans, by a
young gentleman, who afterwards sold it to a farmer near Dunbar.
This pony, at forty-seven years of age, looked remarkably fresh;
trotted eight miles an hour for several miles together; had a very
good set of teeth; eat corn and hay well; was able to go a long
journey; and had not, to appearance, undergone the least alteration,
either in galloping, trotting, or walking, for twenty years preceding.
MUSEUM.
edited by
S. G. GOODRICH,
VOLUME II.
BOSTON:
BRADBURY & SODEN,
10 School Street.
1841.
CONTENTS OF VOLUME II.
Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1841, by S. G. Goodrich, in the Clerk’s
Office of the
District Court of Massachusetts.
MERRY’S MUSEUM.
VOLUME II.
The Siberian Sable-Hunter.
CHAPTER I.