Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download textbook Integrated Uncertainty In Knowledge Modelling And Decision Making 5Th International Symposium Iukm 2016 Da Nang Vietnam November 30 December 2 2016 Proceedings 1St Edition Van Nam Huynh ebook all chapter pdf
Download textbook Integrated Uncertainty In Knowledge Modelling And Decision Making 5Th International Symposium Iukm 2016 Da Nang Vietnam November 30 December 2 2016 Proceedings 1St Edition Van Nam Huynh ebook all chapter pdf
https://textbookfull.com/product/knowledge-and-systems-
sciences-17th-international-symposium-kss-2016-kobe-japan-
november-4-6-2016-proceedings-1st-edition-jian-chen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/decision-and-game-theory-for-
security-7th-international-conference-gamesec-2016-new-york-ny-
usa-november-2-4-2016-proceedings-1st-edition-quanyan-zhu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/games-and-learning-alliance-5th-
international-conference-gala-2016-utrecht-the-netherlands-
december-5-7-2016-proceedings-1st-edition-rosa-bottino/
https://textbookfull.com/product/foundations-of-information-and-
knowledge-systems-9th-international-symposium-foiks-2016-linz-
austria-march-7-11-2016-proceedings-1st-edition-marc-gyssens/
https://textbookfull.com/product/proceedings-of-the-5th-
international-symposium-on-uncertainty-quantification-and-
stochastic-modelling-uncertainties-2020-jose-eduardo-souza-de-
Van-Nam Huynh · Masahiro Inuiguchi
Bac Le · Bao Nguyen Le
Thierry Denoeux (Eds.)
Integrated Uncertainty
LNAI 9978
in Knowledge Modelling
and Decision Making
5th International Symposium, IUKM 2016
Da Nang, Vietnam, November 30 – December 2, 2016
Proceedings
123
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 9978
Integrated Uncertainty
in Knowledge Modelling
and Decision Making
5th International Symposium, IUKM 2016
Da Nang, Vietnam, November 30 – December 2, 2016
Proceedings
123
Editors
Van-Nam Huynh Bao Nguyen Le
Japan Advanced Institute of Science Duy Tan University
and Technology Da Nang
Nomi, Ishikawa Vietnam
Japan
Thierry Denoeux
Masahiro Inuiguchi Université de Technologie de Compiègne
Graduate School of Engineering Science Compiègne
Osaka University France
Toyonaka, Osaka
Japan
Bac Le
University of Science
Ho Chi Minh City
Vietnam
This volume contains the papers that were presented at the 5th International Sympo-
sium on Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making (IUKM
2016) held in Da Nang, Vietnam, from November 30 to December 2, 2016.
The IUKM symposia aim to provide a forum for the exchange of research results
and ideas, and experiences in application among researchers and practitioners involved
with all aspects of uncertainty modelling and management. Previous editions of the
conference were held in Ishikawa, Japan (originally under the name of International
Symposium on Integrated Uncertainty Management and Applications – IUM 2010),
Hangzhou, China (IUKM 2011), Beijing, China (IUKM 2013), and Nha Trang,
Vietnam (IUKM 2015).
IUKM 2016 was jointly organized by Duy Tan University (Da Nang, Vietnam),
Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST), and Belief Functions
and Applications Society (BFAS).
The organizers received 78 submissions. Each of which was peer reviewed by at
least two members of the Program Committee. While 35 papers were accepted after the
first round of reviews, 22 others were conditionally accepted and underwent a rebuttal
stage in which authors were asked to revise their paper in accordance to the reviews,
and prepare an extensive response addressing the reviewers’ concerns. The final
decision was made by the program chairs. Finally, 57 papers were accepted for pre-
sentation at IUKM 2016 and publication in the proceedings. Invited talks presented at
the symposium are also included in this volume.
As a follow-up of the symposium, a special volume of the International Journal of
Approximate Reasoning is anticipated to include a small number of extended papers
selected from the symposium as well as other relevant contributions received in
response to subsequent open calls. These journal submissions will go through a fresh
round of reviews in accordance with the journal’s guidelines.
The IUKM 2016 symposium was partially supported by the National Foundation for
Science and Technology Development of Vietnam (NAFOSTED) and Duy Tan
University. The IUKM 2016 best student paper award was sponsored by Elsevier. We
are very thankful to Dr. Gia-Nhu Nguyen and his local organizing team from Duy Tan
University for their hard work and efficient services and for the wonderful local
arrangements.
We would like to express our appreciation to the members of the Program Com-
mittee for their support and cooperation in this publication. We are also thankful to
Alfred Hofmann, Anna Kramer, and their colleagues at Springer for providing a
meticulous service for the timely production of this volume. Last, but certainly not the
VI Preface
least, our special thanks go to all the authors who submitted papers and all the attendees
for their contributions and fruitful discussions that made this conference a great
success.
General Co-chairs
Bao N. Le Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam
Thierry Denoeux University of Technology of Compiègne, France
Honorary Co-chairs
Michio Sugeno European Center for Soft Computing, Spain
Hung T. Nguyen New Mexico State University, USA;
Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Co C. Le Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam
Sadaaki Miyamoto University of Tsukuba, Japan
Program Co-chairs
Van-Nam Huynh JAIST, Japan
Masahiro Inuiguchi University of Osaka, Japan
Bac Le University of Science, VNU-Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Program Committee
Byeong-Seok Ahn Chung-Ang University, Korea
Yaxin Bi University of Ulster, UK
Bernadette Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France
Bouchon-Meunier
Lam Thu Bui Le Quy Don Technical University, Vietnam
Humberto Bustince Universidad Publica de Navarra, Spain
Tru Cao Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam
Fabio Cuzzolin Oxford Brookes University, UK
Tien-Tuan Dao University of Technology of Compiègne, France
Bernard De Baets Ghent University, Belgium
Yong Deng Xian Jiaotong University, China
VIII Organization
Sponsoring Institutions
Hiroshi Mamitsuka
Hung T. Nguyen
Short biography: Prof. Hung T. Nguyen received the BS degree (1967) from
University of Paris XI, the Master degree (1968) from University of Paris VI, and the
PhD degree (1975) from University of Lille (France), all in Mathematics. After
spending several years at the University of California, Berkeley and the University of
Massachusetts, Amherst, he joined the faculty of Mathematical Sciences, New Mexico
State University (USA), where he is currently a Professor Emeritus. He is also an
Adjunct Professor of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, and was on the
LIFE Chair on Fuzzy Theory at Tokyo Institute of Technology (Japan) during 1992-
1993, Distinguished Visiting Lukacs Professor of Statistics at Bowling Green State
University, Ohio, in 2002, Distinguished Fellow of the American Society of Engi-
neering Education (ASEE), Fellow of the International Fuzzy Systems Association
(IFSA). He has published 16 books, 6 edited books and more than 100 papers. Dr.
Nguyen’s current research interests include Fuzzy Logics and their Applications,
Random Set Theory, Risk Analysis, and Casual Inference in Econometrics.
Summary: In view of the recent ban of the use of P-values in statistical inference, since
they are not qualified as information measures of support from empirical evidence, we
will not only take a closer look at them, but also embark on a panorama of more
promising ingredients which could replace P-values for statistical science as well as for
any fields involving reasoning with integrated uncertainty. These ingredients include
the recently developed theory of Inferential Models, the emergent Information Theo-
retic Statistics, and of course Bayesian statistics. One main focus of our analysis of
information measures is its logical aspect where emphasis will be placed upon con-
ditional (event) logic, probability logic, possibility distributions, and some fuzzy sets.
Autonomous Systems: Many Possibilities
and Challenges
Akira Namatame
Katsuhiro Honda
Invited Papers
Linguistic Features and Learning to Rank Methods for Shopping Advice . . . . 269
Xuan-Huy Nguyen and Le-Minh Nguyen
Contents XXI
A Convex Combination Method for Linear Regression with Interval Data . . . 469
Somsak Chanaim, Songsak Sriboonchitta, and Chongkolnee Rungruang
Statistical Methods
Econometric Applications
Does Asian Credit Default Swap Index Improve Portfolio Performance? . . . . 624
Chatchai Khiewngamdee, Woraphon Yamaka,
and Songsak Sriboonchitta
What Firms Must Pay Bribes and How Much? An Empirical Study of Small
and Medium Enterprises in Vietnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 689
Thi Thuong Vu and Chon Van Le
Hung T. Nguyen1,2(B)
1
Department of Mathematical Sciences, New Mexico State University,
Las Cruces, USA
hunguyen@nmsu.edu
2
Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
1 Introduction
The recent ban on the use of the notion of P-values in hypothesis testing (Trafi-
mow and Marks [32]) triggered a serious reexamination of the way we used
to conduct inference in the face of uncertainty. Since statistical uncertainty is
an important part of an integrated uncertainty system, a closer look at what
went wrong with statistical inference is necessary to “repair” the whole infer-
ence machinery in complex systems.
Thus, this paper is organized as follows. We start out, in Sect. 2, by
elaborating on the notion of P-values as a testing procedure in null hypothe-
sis signficance testing (NHST). In Sect. 3, within the context of reasoning with
uncertainty where logical aspects and information measures are emphasized, we
elaborate on why p-values should not be used as an inference procedure any-
more. Section 4 addresses the question “What are the items in statistical theory
c Springer International Publishing AG 2016
V.-N. Huynh et al. (Eds.): IUKM 2016, LNAI 9978, pp. 3–15, 2016.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49046-5 1
4 H.T. Nguyen
which are affected by the removal of P-values?”. Section 5 points out alternative
inference procedures in a world without P-values. We reserve the last Sect. 6 for
a possible “in defense of P-values”.
Starting with NHST, the unique way to infer conclusions from data is the tra-
ditional notion of P-values. However, there is something fishy about the use of
P-values as a “valid” inference procedure, since quite sometimes serious prob-
lems with them arised, exemplified by Cohen [6], Schervish [30], Goodman [13],
Hurlbert and Lombardi [15], Lavine [16], and Nuzzo [28].
Having relied upon P-value as the inference procedure to carry out NHST
(their bread and butter research tool) for so long, the Psychology community
finally has enough of its “wrong doings”, and without any reactions from the
international statistical community (which is responsable for inventing and devel-
oping statistical tools for all other sciences to use), decided, on their own, to ban
NHST-Procedure (meaning P-values), Trafimow and Marks [32]. While this is a
ban only for their Basic and Applied Social Psychology Journal, the impact is
worldwide. It is not about the “ban”, it is about “what wrong with P-values?”
that we should all be concerned. For a flavor of doing wrong statistics, see e.g.,
Wheelan [34].
On Evidential Measures of Support for Reasoning 5
Even, the ban gets everybody’s attention now, what happend since last year?
Nothing! Why? Even after the American Statistical Association issued a “state-
ment” about P-values (ASA News [2]), and Wassertein and Lazar [33], not ban-
ning P-values (why not?), but “stating” six “principles”.
What do you read and expect from the above “statement”? Some literature
search reveals stuff like this. “Together we agreed that the current culture of
statistical significance testing, interpretation, and reporting has to go, and that
adherence to a minimum of six principles can help to pave the way forward for
science and society”. And in the Sciences News, for laymen, “P-value ban: small
step for a journal, giant leap for sicence”. See also, Lavine [16].
There are three theoretical facts which make P-values undesirable for statis-
tical inference:
(i) P-values are not model probabilities.
First, observe that a hypothesis is a statistical model. The P-value P (Tn ≥
t|Ho ) is the probability of observing of an extreme value t if the null hypothesis
is true. It is not P (Ho |Tn ≥ t) even when this “model probability given the
data” makes sense (e.g., as in the Bayesian framework where Ho is viewed as a
random event). Note that when P (Ho |Tn ≥ t) makes sense and is available, it
is legitimate to use it for model selection (a valid inference procedure from at
least a common sense standpoint). In a frequentist framework, there is no way
to convert P (Tn ≥ t|Ho ) to P (Ho |Tn ≥ t). As such, the P-value P (Tn ≥ t|Ho ),
alone, is useless for inference, precisely as “stated” in the sixth principle of
the ASA.
(ii) The reasoning with P-values is based on an invalid logic.
As mentioned by Cohen [6] and in the previous section, the use of P-values to
reject Ho seems to be based on a form of Modus Tollens in logic, since after all,
reasoning under uncertainty is inference ! and, each mode of reasoning is based
upon a logic. Now, thanks to Artificial Intelligence (AI), we are exposed to a
variety of logics, such as probability logic, conditional probability logic, fuzzy
logics...which are logics for reasoning under various types of uncertainty. See a
text like Goodman, Nguyen and Walker [12]. In particular, we could face rules
that have exceptions (see e.g., Bamber, Goodman and Nguyen, [3]). The famous
“penguin triangle” in AI can be used to illustrate well the invalidity of Modus
Tollens in uncertain logics.
While we focus in this address on reasoning with P-values in probabilis-
tic systems, perhaps few words about reasoning with more complex systems
in which several different types of uncertainty are involved (integrated uncer-
tain systems) should be mentioned. To create machines capable of ever more
sophisticated tasks, and of exhibiting ever more human-like behavior, we need
knowledge representation and associated reasoning (logic). In probabilistic sys-
tems, no additional mathematical tools are needed, since we are simply dealing
with probability distributions, and the logic used is classical two-valued logic.
For general integrated uncertain systems, new mathematical tools such as con-
ditional events, possibility theory, fuzzy logics are needed. See, e,g., Nguyen and
Walker [25], Nguyen and Walker [26], Nguyen [27].
6 H.T. Nguyen
P (Tn ∈ Rα |Ho ) ≤ α
Are P-values left out in this determination of rejection regions? (i.e., the
rationale of inference in NP tests does not depend on P-values of Tn ?). Put it
differently: How to “pick” a region Rα to be a rejection region?
Note that the P-value statistic p(Tn ) = 1 − FTn |Ho (Tn ) corresponds to a N-P
test. Indeed, let α be given as the type-I error. Then, the test, say, Sn , which
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Ojos abiertos, pechos
enconosos,
tu gran beldad, mis ricas
intenciones,
cercadas de legiones de
envidiosos.
Bien imagino yo que si te
pones
á querer tropellar dificultades,
irás segura en carros de
leones.
Bien tienes entendidas mis
verdades,
y que en mí son llanezas
conocidas
las que en mil otros son
curiosidades.
Bien sabes que quisiera
tantas vidas
cuantos momentos vivo por
contallas,
por muy ganadas, en tu Amor
perdidas.
Y bien sé yo que en mi
rudeza hallas
iugenio soberano para amarte,
y sabes que te escucho aun
cuando callas.
Entiendes que me huyo por
buscarte,
y alguna vez tan sin piedad
me dexas,
que pierdo la esperanza de
hallarte.
Conoces claramente que
mis quexas
llevan puro dolor sin artificio,
y con descuido mi cuidado
aquexas.
Mis ojos ven que el principal
oficio
que, sustentando el cuerpo, al
alma honra,
es, no faltar los dos de tu
servicio.
Y ven los tuyos, vueltos á mi
honra,
que el rato que sin ellos me
imagino,
tengo el alma y la vida por
deshonra.
Alguna vez creciendo el
desatino,
á fuerza del pestífero veneno
matarme ó despeñarme
determino.
Acoge ¡oh mar! en tu
sagrado seno
esta barquilla, que á tu golfo
embiste,
porque se alabe de algún día
sereno.
Essos divinos Nortes, que
escogiste,
de la primera inacessible
lumbre,
para alegrar al navegante
triste,
Muéstrense en essa
soberana cumbre,
hincha la vela el viento
favorable
contra la calma desta
pesadumbre.
Deje el cuidado el remo
incomportable,
y estotras jarcias de trabajos
llenas,
tórnense en ejercicio
saludable.
Cántenme tus dulcíssimas
sirenas,
que vencida del sueño mi
barquilla,
y á voluntad la sangre de mis
venas,
Si tu Neptuno á mi favor se
humilla
aumentarás tus obras y mi
suerte,
librando en tan heroica
maravilla
á quien te ofrece el alma de la
muerte.
FILARDO
Tus ojos, tus cabellos, tu
belleza,
soles son, lazos de oro, gloria
mía,
que ofuscan, atan, visten de
alegría,
el alma, el cuello, la mayor
tristeza.
Fuego, no siente el alma tu
aspereza;
yugo, no teme el cuello tu
porfía;
que bastante reparo y osadía
concede Amor en tanta
gentileza.
Rabia, que por mis venas te
derramas;
oro, que á servidumbre me
condenas;
beldad, por quien la vida se
assegura,
Pues soy un nuevo Fénix en
las llamas,
y hallo libertad en las cadenas,
amo y bendigo tanta
hermosura.
MIRENO
Sale la Aurora, de su luz
vertiendo
las mismas perlas que el
Oriente cría;
vase llenando el cielo de
alegría,
vase la tierra de beldad
vistiendo.
Las claras fuentes y los ríos
corriendo,
las plantas esmaltándose á
porfía,
las avecillas saludando el día,
con harmonía la nueva luz
hiriendo.
Y esta Aurora gentil, y este
adornado
mundo de los tesoros ricos,
caros,
que el cielo ofrece, con que al
hombre admira,
Es miseria y tristeza,
comparado
á la belleza de tus ojos claros,
cuando los alzas á mirar sin
ira.
PRADELIO
Mientras la lumbre de tus
claros ojos
estuvo en el Oriente de mi
gloria,
entendimiento, voluntad,
memoria
ofrecieron al alma mil
despojos.
Mas después que, siguiendo
tus antojos,
á gente extraña fue su luz
notoria,
es mi rico tesoro pobre
escoria,
mis blandos gustos ásperos
enojos.
Vuelva ya el rayo á su lugar
usado;
pero no vuelva, que una vez
partido,
no puede ser que no haya sido
ajeno.
Mas ¡ay! sol de mi alma
deseado,
vuelve á mis ojos, que una vez
venido,
mi turbio día tornarás sereno.
MENDINO
Ponen, Filis, en cuestión
mi corazón y mis ojos,
cuál goza de más despojos,
los ojos ó el corazón.
Los ojos dicen que os
vieron,
y de vuestro grado os ven,
y que del presente bien
la primera causa fueron,
prueba en la misma razón
el corazón á los ojos;
¿que gozarán más despojos
los ojos ó el corazón?
Poco importa más testigo,
dicen los ojos que á ti;
dice el corazón, ni á mí,
de lo que tengo conmigo;
no les niega su razón,
el corazón á los ojos,
no le nieguen sus despojos
los ojos al corazón.
Su contienda es por demás,
pues todos llevan vitoria,
estando llenos de gloria,
sin que á nadie quepa más;
mas viva la presunción
del corazón y los ojos,
por ser de quien son despojos
los ojos y el corazón.
Son estos competidores
flacos, aunque liberales,
que en efeto son mortales
y hanlo de ser sus favores;
si pone el alma el bastón
entre corazón y ojos,
verán eternos despojos
los ojos y el corazón.
CARDENIO
Por mirar vuestros cabellos
quitóse la venda Amor,
y estúvierale mejor
dar otro ñudo y no vellos.
Quítesela no entendiendo
lo que le podía venir,
valiérale más vivir
deseando que muriendo,
pues fué de los lazos bellos
atado con tal rigor,
que se le tornó dolor
toda la gloria de vellos.
Entenderá desta suerte
que fué grande devaneo
dar armas á su deseo
con que le diesse la muerte.
Voluntad de conocellos
fuera su pena mayor,
mirad si será peor
perder la vida por ellos.
Hizo sus ojos testigos
de tan alto merecer,
y dió su mismo poder
vitoria á sus enemigos;
que si con estos cabellos
quitó mil vidas Amor,
vengáranse en su dolor
los que padecen por vellos.
Quiso ver con qué prendía
y sus redes le prendieron,
y á herirle se volvieron
las flechas con que hería.
Quedar cautivo de aquellos
cabellos fué gran honor,
pero fuérale mejor
olvidallos y no vellos.
SIRALVO
Filida, tus ojos bellos
el que se atreve á mirallos,
muy más fácil que alaballos
le será morir por ellos.
Ante ellos calla el primor,
ríndese la fortaleza,
porque mata su belleza
y ciega su resplandor.
Son ojos verdes, rasgados,
en el revolver suaves,
apacibles sobre graves,
mañosos y descuidados.
Con ira ó con mansedumbre,
de suerte alegran el suelo,
que fijados en el cielo
no diera el sol tanta lumbre.
Amor, que suele ocupar
todo cuanto el mundo
encierra,
señoreando la tierra,
tiranizando la mar,
para llevar más despojos,
sin tener contradición,
hizo su casa y prisión
en essos hermosos ojos.
Allí canta y dice: Yo
ciego fui, que no lo niego,
pero venturoso ciego,
que tales ojos halló,
que aunque es vuestra la
vitoria
en dárosla fui tan diestro,
que siendo cautivo vuestro
sois mis ojos y mi gloria.
El tiempo que me juzgaban
por ciego, quíselo ser,
porque no era razón ver
si estos ojos me faltaban;
será ahora con hallaros,
esta ley establecida:
que lo pague con la vida
quien se atreviere á miraros.
Y con esto, placentero
dice á su madre mil chistes:
el arquillo que me distes
tomáosle, que no le quiero;
pues triunfo siendo rendido
de aquestas dos cejas bellas,
haré yo dos arcos dellas
que al vuestro dejen corrido.
Estas saetas que veis,
la de plomo y la dorada,
como herencia renunciada,
buscad á quien se las deis,
porque yo de aqui adelante
podré con estas pestañas,
atravessar las entrañas
á mil pechos de diamante.
Hielo que dexa temblando,
fuego que la nieve enciende,
gracia que cautiva y prende,
ira que mata rabiando;
con otros mil señoríos
y poderes que alcanzáis
vosotros me los prestáis,
dulcíssimos ojos míos.
Cuando de aquestos
blasones
el niño Amor presumía,
cielo y tierra parecía
que aprobaban sus razones,
y él dos mil juegos haciendo
entre las luces serenas,
de su pecho, á manos llenas,
amores iba lloviendo.
Yo que supe aventurarme
á vellos y á conocer
no todo su merecer
mas lo que basta á matarme,
tengo por muy llano ahora
lo que en la tierra se suena,
que no hay Amor ni hay
cadena,
mas hay tus ojos, señora.
PRADELIO
Ya que de tu presencia,
cruel y hermossísima pastora,
parto por tu sentencia,
la desdichada hora
que con tanta razón el alma
llora;
Queriendo ya partirme
de cuanto me solía dar
contento,
habré de despedirme,
dando, en tanto tormento,
mis esperanzas y mi lengua al
viento.
Adiós, ribera verde,
do muestra el cielo eterna
primavera;
que el que se va y te pierde,
su partida tuviera
por muy mejor si de la vida
fuera.
Adiós, serenas fuentes,
donde me vi tan rico de
despojos,
que si quedáis ausentes,
presentes mis enojos
me dan otras dos fuentes de
mis ojos.
Adiós, hermosas plantas,
adonde dejo el rostro
soberano,
con excelencias tantas,
que todo el siglo humano
celebrará las obras de mi
mano.
Adiós, aguas del Tajo
y Ninfas dél, que en el
albergue usado
sentiréis mi trabajo,
pues el cantar passado
en tristeza y en llanto se ha
trocado.
Adiós, laurel y hiedra,
que fregando uno en otro os
encendía.
Adiós, acero y piedra,
de do también salía
el fuego que ya va en el alma
mía.
Adiós, ganado mío,
que ya fui por tu nombre
conocido,
mas ya por desvarío
del hado endurecido
tu nombre pierdo, pues que
voy perdido.
Adiós, bastón de acebo,
que conducir solías mis
ganados,
pues los que agora llevo
de penas y cuidados,
de Fortuna y Amor serán
guardados.
Adiós, mastines fieros,
bastantes á vencer con
vuestras mañas
los lobos carniceros,
antes que yo las sañas
de aquella que se ceba en mis
entrañas.
Adiós, espejo escaso,
donde sólo se ve lo pobre y
viejo,
pues fuera duro caso
mirarse el sobrecejo,
faltando al alma su más claro
espejo.
Adiós, cabaña triste,
que en el tiempo passado más
copiosa
de gozo y gloria fuiste;
ya, sola y enfadosa,
sierpes te habitarán, que no
otra cosa.
Adiós, horas passadas;
testigo es aquel tiempo de
vitoria,
que si debilitadas
perdistes ya mi gloria,
no os perderá por esso mi
memoria.
Adiós, aves del cielo,
que no puedo imitar vuestra
costumbre.
Adiós, el Dios de Delo,
que tu sagrada lumbre
fuera de aquí no quiero que
me alumbre.
Adiós, adiós, pastores,
adiós, nobleza de la pastoría,
que sin otros dolores
turbará mi alegría
dejar vuestra agradable
compañía.
Adiós, luz de mi vida,
Filena ingrata; en tan mortal
quebranto
cesse mi despedida,
porque el dolor es tanto
que se impide la lengua con el
llanto.
SEXTA PARTE
DEL PASTOR DE FILIDA