Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Neither Man Nor Beast Feminism and The Defense of Animals Carol J Adams Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Neither Man Nor Beast Feminism and The Defense of Animals Carol J Adams Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/animaladies-gender-animals-and-
madness-carol-j-adams/
https://textbookfull.com/product/neither-wolf-nor-dog-on-
forgotten-roads-with-an-indian-elder-dan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/neither-wolf-nor-dog-on-
forgotten-roads-with-an-indian-elder-kent-nerburn/
https://textbookfull.com/product/imperial-beast-fables-animals-
cosmopolitanism-and-the-british-empire-kaori-nagai/
Death is the Beginning 1st Edition T. J. Adams [Adams
https://textbookfull.com/product/death-is-the-beginning-1st-
edition-t-j-adams-adams/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-art-of-self-defense-a-do-it-
yourself-self-defense-guide-for-security-personnel-and-for-the-
lay-man-2nd-edition-christopher-fernandes/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-nutrition-and-
pregnancy-carol-j-lammi-keefe/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-decolonial-feminism-francoise-
verges-ashley-j-bohrer/
https://textbookfull.com/product/princess-to-pleasure-slave-
chronicles-book-five-eagerly-bred-by-the-beast-man-1st-edition-
amanda-clover-jay-aury-clover/
Neither Man
nor Beast
Neither Man
nor Beast
Carol J. Adams
Bloomsbury Academic
Bloomsbury Academic
50 Bedford Square
1385 Broadway
London
New York
WC1B 3DP
NY 10018
UK
USA
www.bloomsbury.com
BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
Carol J. Adams has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs
and Patents Act,
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
ISBN: PB: 978-1-3500-4020-5
ePDF: 978-1-3500-4022-9
eBook: 978-1-3500-4021-2
In memory of my parents
gifted teachers
And then, occasional y, when [Blue, the horse] came up for apples,
or I
took apples to him, he looked at me. It was a look so piercing, so full
of
there are people who do not know that animals suffer. People like me
who
have forgotten, and daily forget, all that animals try to tell us.
“Everything
We are one lesson” is essential y it, I think. There are those who
never
once have even considered animals’ rights: those who have been
taught
someone taught them this: “Women can’t think,” and “niggers can’t
faint.”
But most disturbing of al , in Blue’s large brown eyes was a new look,
more
painful than the look of despair: the look of disgust with human
beings,
with life; the look of hatred. And it was odd what the look of hatred
did.
It gave him, for the first time, the look of a beast. And what that
meant
violence; all the apples in the world wouldn’t change that fact.
peaceful to look at from the window, white against the grass. Once a
friend came to visit and said, looking out on the soothing view: “And
steaks. I am eating misery, I thought, as I took the first bite. And spit
it out.
—Alice Walker, “Am I Blue?” 1986
viii
Contents
Illustrations xi
Preface xxxvii
1 Eating Animals 3
Environmentalism 117
Contents
Part Three From Misery to Grace 133
Ontology 175
Coda 197
Notes 203
Bibliography 241
Index 261
Illustrations
6 Turkey hooker. 10
Chart, 2009. 65
Illustrations
Chickens, 2008. 66
xii
xiii
Figure 1 Greek Moothology, California, March 2016, photograph by
Mark Hawthorne.
REVELATIONS EDITION
repressed.
the image on the original publication of this book; she, too, is neither
man
days—are numbered.
I am honored that Neither Man nor Beast has been selected to enter
book, I register the optimism and energy that were their sources.
Elsewhere
to describe how some of the essays came into being. I believe their
history
Our task is to record those stories and leave to future historians the
work of
Metis. Venus is said to have sprung from no woman’s womb but from
the
from the sea (the primordial female water, the uterine water) or the
father’s
head. When one rises from the sea, one doesn’t have a past, or a
biography.
A cow’s milk production is prompted by pregnancy and delivery, but
any
calf who drinks the mother’s milk prevents the product from reaching
the
the cow and those who drink the milk taken from her, or between
milk
and milk-drinkers. In the original image from the Second World War
that
inspired Figure 2, Rosie the Riveter announced “We Can Do It.” Her
noun and verb referred to the collective work efforts of women. With
the “You
Can Drink It” postcard, the cow’s work at producing milk disappears,
and
exploitation.
fathers are revered; mothers often ignored. This is true for the
animal rights
movement as wel . The way our story is told is that Peter Singer is
the father
of the animal liberation movement; if not Peter, then the late Tom
Regan
is assigned the title. The work of both Tom and Peter is important for
the
xvi
Preface to the Bloomsbury Revelations Edition
were wrong.
arose from a book review of the 1971 anthology Animals, Men and
Morals:
xvii
book, what is lost is not just the women’s voices but also the role of
feminism
During 1975 and 1976, I interviewed more than forty feminists who
Chapter 5.) But the animal movement, like the patriarchal world in
which
those little old ladies in sneakers that male activists continual y assert
the
Society of the United States, told the New York Times Magazine: “
‘We aren’t
(Jones). I concluded Neither Man nor Beast with a “Coda” that offers
a
the twenty-first century this stereotype would still haunt the men
leaders
the way that feminist writers have been eclipsed in the presentation
of the
xviii
that women and animals are categories liable to trope one another
in producing the dominant category of white, human masculinity.
Yet despite this continuity with Adams, Donovan, and others, Animal
Gruen, Marti Kheel, Greta Gaard and myself offered a way of looking
with
feminist insights not only into the status of animals, but into the
concept
right way.
While regressive politics are reflected in how animal rights and animal
studies history is told, equal y disturbing is the status of women in
the
male. The view that their contributions makes their position “too
important
the movement when they see how they are ostracized for discussing
what
Movement.”)
longer just like them. But, almost a quarter of century after I wrote
that
“Venus,” they will not know old age. Though they could live to be
twenty
years old or more, most cows exploited for their milk are dead by the
age
of four.
xix
autumn of 1974 that the idea that become The Sexual Politics of
Meat took
Throughout the length and breadth of the Roman Empire all but a
very few Roman nobles thus professed the faith of Christ. In the
words of the dying Julian, the Galilaean had conquered.
From this time until our own, Christianity has reigned in the West
with no serious rival. In the VIIth century, when Mahommed’s Arabs,
flushed with the enthusiasm of a new faith which owed something at
least to the relics of Gnosticism, poured in upon an Empire wearied
out alike by perpetual war against the barbarians and by its own civil
and religious dissensions, the Church was compelled to abandon to
them her conquests in Africa and the East. In Europe, however, she
continued in unchecked supremacy, gathering to herself and
assimilating the barbarians who at one time seemed likely to
extinguish all civilization; and she thus became a bond uniting many
nations and languages in one community of faith and thought. She
even succeeded in keeping alive the remains of that Greek art and
learning which still form our best and proudest intellectual
possession, and if during her reign many of the precious monuments
of antiquity perished, the fault was not entirely hers. In every respect,
her rule was supreme; and such enemies as she had in Europe were
those of her own household. The Manichaeans who, as has been
said, once bid fair to deprive her of some of her fairest provinces,
never dared to make open war upon her, and their secret defection
was punished by an unsparing use of the secular arm. The German
Reformation of the XVIth century has probably left her stronger than
before, and the few losses that she has suffered in the Old World
have been more than compensated by the number of lieges she has
succeeded in attaching to herself in the New.
In the days of her infancy, and before she thus came into her
inheritance, Christianity borrowed much from the rivals over which
she was in the long run to reign supreme. Her outward observances,
her ritual, and the organization of her hierarchy, are perhaps all due
to the associations that she finally overcame. The form of her
sacraments, the periods of her fasts and festivals, and institutions
like monachism, cannot be explained without reference to those
religions from whose rivalry she so long suffered. That, in such
matters, the Church should take what was useful to her was, as said
above, part of her consciously expressed policy, and doubtless had
much to do with her speedy triumph. To show that her dogmas also
took many things from the same source would involve an invasion
into the domain of professional theology, for which I have neither
authority nor desire. But if, at some future time, investigation should
show that in this respect also Christianity owes something to her
forerunners and rivals, the argument against her Divine origin would
not thereby be necessarily strengthened. That, in the course of her
development, she acquired characteristics which fitted her to her
environment would be in strict conformity with the laws which appear
to govern the evolution of all institutions; and if the Power ruling the
universe chooses to work by law rather than by what seems to us
like caprice, such a choice does not show Him to be lacking either in
wisdom or benevolence.
As was said at the outset, everyone must be left to place his own
interpretation on the facts here attempted to be set forth. But if, per
impossibile, we could approach the study of the origins of
Christianity with the same mental detachment and freedom from
prejudice with which we might examine the worship of the Syrian
Jupiter Dolichenus or the Scandinavian Odin, we should probably
find that the Primitive Church had no need of the miraculous powers
which were once assigned as the reason for her gradual and steady
advance to all but universal dominion. On the contrary, it may be that
Christianity would then appear as a link—although a most important
and necessary link—in a regular chain of events which began more
than three centuries before she emerged from her birthplace in
Palestine into that Roman world which in three centuries more was
to be hers of right. No sooner had Alexander’s conquests made a
world-religion possible, than there sprang up, as we have seen, in
his own city of Alexandria, a faith with a far higher and purer idea of
Divinity than any that had until then been known in the West. Then
the germs already present in small fraternities like those of the
Orphics and the Essenes blossomed forth into the fantastic and
unwholesome growths, as we must needs think them, of that
Gnosticism which marked the transition of the ancient world from
Paganism to Christianity. Lastly there came in from the countries
under the influence of Rome’s secular enemy, Persia, the heresy of
Marcion, the religion of Mithras, and the syncretistic policy of Manes
and his continuators. Against all these in turn, Christianity had to
struggle in a contest where the victory was not always on her side:
and if in time she overthrew them all, it can only be because she was
better fitted to the needs of the world than any of her predecessors
or contemporaries.
INDEX