Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Molecularly Imprinted Catalysts Principles Syntheses and Applications 1St Edition Cao Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Molecularly Imprinted Catalysts Principles Syntheses and Applications 1St Edition Cao Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/basic-organometallic-chemistry-
concepts-syntheses-and-applications-b-d-gupta/
https://textbookfull.com/product/antioxidant-nutraceuticals-
preventive-and-healthcare-applications-first-edition-chuanhai-
cao/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-maleic-anhydride-
based-materials-syntheses-properties-and-applications-1st-
edition-osama-m-musa-eds/
Bionanotechnology: Principles and Applications 1st
Edition Anil Kumar Anal
https://textbookfull.com/product/bionanotechnology-principles-
and-applications-1st-edition-anil-kumar-anal/
https://textbookfull.com/product/principles-of-econometrics-
theory-and-applications-1st-edition-mignon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/virology-principles-and-
applications-2nd-edition-unknown/
https://textbookfull.com/product/animal-law-and-welfare-
international-perspectives-1st-edition-deborah-cao/
https://textbookfull.com/product/structured-glass-fiber-
catalysts-first-edition-lopatin/
Molecularly Imprinted
Catalysts
Principles, Syntheses, and Applications
Edited by
Songjun Li
School of Materials Science & Engineering,
Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
Shunsheng Cao
Associate Professor, Jiangsu University, China
Secretary-General, the Chinese Advanced Materials Society
Marie Curie Fellow, European Commission
Sergey A. Piletsky
Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or
medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein.
In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the
safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors,
assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of
products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods,
products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-801301-4
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress
xi
xii CONTRIBUTORS
Rüstem Keçili Plant, Drug and Scientific Research Center, Anadolu University,
Eskişehir, Turkey
Lei Peng Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam,
Germany
Anthony P.F. Turner Biosensors & Bioelectronics Centre, IFM, Linköping University,
Linköping, Sweden
xv
xvi EDITORS’ BIOGRAPHIES
I welcome the timely publication of this volume entitled Molecularly Imprinted Catalysts:
Principles, Syntheses, and Applications. For many, molecular imprinting is associated with
traditional areas of application such as selective adsorbents, separations, and solid-phase
extraction. Indeed, the latter has achieved some commercial success, with a number of
products available in the marketplace. The next wave of products based on molecularly
imprinted polymers (MIPs) is likely to come from technological developments in the areas of
sensors, diagnostic assays, and biomedicine. A significant challenge currently facing the
chemical industries is the development of selective catalytic systems. Catalysts both reduce
the temperature at which specific chemical transformations take place and steer reactions in
favor of the desired product over undesirable byproducts, reducing energy demand and
lowering waste in the process. This clearly has economic, environmental, and societal ben-
efits resulting from a “green chemistry” approach and has spurred the development of new
catalysts. Scientists working on MIPs have not been slow to take up the challenge. Catalytic
MIPs can make a unique contribution to this field because they can combine design elements
from nature in the form of biomimetic catalysis or from manmade transition metal catalyst
design, combined with elements of smart polymer synthesis. These sophisticated approaches
may pave the way for a new generation of switchable MIP catalysts offering exquisite regio-
and stereoselectivity in chemical transformations. In parallel, new MIP-based catalysts may
compete with enzymes in areas such as sensors and assays and may find new applications in
environments (such as extremes in temperature or pH) in which enzymes would be rapidly
degraded. This volume describes key advances made to date in the field of MIP-based
catalysis.
This book is composed of 13 chapters describing the field of molecularly imprinted
catalysis and catalyst design. In the first chapter, Li et al. critically review some of the key
issues involved in the design, synthesis, and application of catalytic MIPs. Similarities and
differences between synthetic approaches to conventional MIPs and imprinted polymers
designed to show catalytic properties are highlighted. The future outlook for catalytic MIPs is
also discussed. The chapter by Scheller et al. focuses on catalytically active MIP architectures.
This is a developing field that combines enzyme-like catalysis with a biomimetic design to
achieve selective catalytic function. Progress made in esterolytic MIPs, MIPs using metal
complexes and prosthetic groups, new MIP–enzyme architectures, and protein-based MIPs is
presented. One of the most frequently applied methods used in the preparation of catalyti-
cally active MIPs is the imprinting of a transition state analogue of the target reaction, which
is intended to lower the activation barrier for a reaction to take place within the MIP. Another
approach is to incorporate transition metals such as Fe(III), Cu(II), Co(II), Zn(II), or mimics of
the catalytic center of enzymes.
In Chapter 3, Dramou et al. describe different approaches to the design of MIPs for
biomimetic catalysis, including progress made in the area intended to enhance the effect. It is
a challenge for chemists to mimic the catalytic machinery of nature through synthetic
methods. This requires a proper understanding of the nature of enzymatic catalysis, which
would help when designing tailor-made catalysts. Molecularly imprinted polymers represent
xvii
xviii FOREWORD
one of the most efficient techniques by which the selectivity and specificity of enzymes can be
mimicked using a comparable range of geometric constraints analogous to natural catalysts.
The chapter by Holdsworth et al. summarizes the design and synthesis of molecularly
imprinted microspheres. Major strategies in polymer design and synthesis applicable to
molecularly imprinted nano- and microparticulates are reviewed, including alternative
initiation processes, “greener” porogens, alternative cross-linkers, and custom-designed
monomers. The difficulty in assessing the binding performance of MIP microspheres asso-
ciated with changes in particle size owing to template effects is briefly discussed.
Core–cross-linked star polymers, accessible via modern polymer synthetic routes, are intro-
duced as a way forward for applications that require processable or soluble MIP materials. In
Chapter 5, Dickert and Mujahid discuss the development of molecularly imprinted catalysts
by citing examples prepared using different binding interactions such as covalent, non-
covalent, stoichiometric noncovalent, and metal-coordination approaches. Challenges in
using imprinted polymers as synthetic catalysts and possible solutions to these problems are
highlighted. In addition, some emerging trends in the design of imprinted catalysts, i.e., the
developments of microgels and nanogels are described along with a description of their
contribution to the field.
Most chemical and biochemical reactions subject to enzymatic catalysis occur with a
high degree of specificity and with rapid reaction rates under very mild conditions. Therefore,
the creation of artificial catalysts that can reproduce the catalytic performance of natural
enzymes has been an aspiration of scientists. In Chapter 6, Say et al. describe how to design
MIPs as artificial catalysts as enzyme mimics. In the following two chapters, Szekely et al.
present the synthesis and applications of mimics of metalloenzymes obtained via imprinting,
and Li et al. describe the mechanism of recognition and selectivity of molecularly imprinting
membranes. It is evident that imprinted metal-containing catalysts can be designed to
control reactions that are not catalyzed by natural enzymes, such as the degradation of
contaminants present in soil or water contaminants, and for hydrogen production. Rational
design methodologies and statistical methods such as the design of experiments are expected
to assist in the screening of matrices for their catalytic performance and consequently
accelerate further developments in the field. Methods of improving the recognition
performance of the molecular imprinting technique include changing the environment
of aggregation and testing; modifying the imprinting unit; employing the effect of metal
ion-coordination; applying dendrimers, monolayers, and multilayer self-assembly-based
molecularly imprinted techniques; and using combinatorial methods in synthesis and of
chemometric forecasting methods to design MIPs with the desired specific recognition
properties. Kutner and D’Souza et al. review MIPs as synthetic catalysts in Chapter 9, and
Shen describes molecularly imprinted photocatalysts in Chapter 10. Zhao et al. introduce the
use of MIPs as biomimetic catalysts in Chapter 11. Significant progress in improvement of the
morphology, solubility, and monodispersity of MIP catalysts and some successful applica-
tions in eliminating contaminants from polluted water or soil samples are summarized.
Yoshimi reviews MIPs applicable for biomimetic catalysts in sensors in Chapter 12. Wagner
et al. describe the use of MIPs as synthetic receptors in diagnostic medical devices in Chapter
13. It appears possible that a straightforward sensor platform compatible with electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy and featuring a novel readout technique can be developed
by incorporating MIPs into sensing devices.
Several volumes, each consisting of many chapters, are probably insufficient to cover all
of the new developments made in molecularly imprinted catalysts. Therefore, this book can
provide only an overview to highlight some of the most important recent research. The
editors are to be congratulated in having assembled a volume that includes the most
FOREWORD xix
extensively studied areas, and which I am sure will be of interest to a broad range of in-
vestigators and researchers in this and related fields. I would also like to thank both Elsevier
and the leading editor, Dr Songjun Li, for inviting me to write this Foreword, and I
congratulate all of the contributors for making this interesting book possible.
Catalysis is currently the subject of intense research because of its importance in a broad
range of implications, from industry to agriculture, aerospace to aviation, environment to
ecology, military to civilian purposes, and inanimate objects to living bodies. The emerging
challenge associated with the tantalizing demand for selective catalytic ability has fueled an
essential need for novel catalytic technology and materials. Progress is slowly being made in
this field by the adoption of multifunctional supports and emerging technology, including
molecular sieve catalysts, nanoparticle catalysts, and organic topologic inclusions, which often
have properties that can control the access of substrate to the encapsulated metal nano-
particles and/or active frameworks. It appears possible that selective catalysts may be ach-
ieved by carefully controlling the size of metal particles, metal–support interaction, and/or
tuned active frameworks. Nonetheless, it remains a challenge to achieve a generic protocol
suitable for the development of selective catalytic ability, based on currently reported findings.
One important reason associated with the phenomena may be the low structural complexity
and simplicity of these conventional supported or nanometer catalysts, in contrast to the
elaborate architectures in active biomacromolecules. It is difficult and even impossible to
straightforwardly develop a well-tuned relationship between the structures of conventional
catalysts and their functions, which was often held by active biomacromolecules. Novel
technology and methods are clearly required.
Known as “key-to-lock” technology, the latest development in molecular imprinting
has led to a promising solution to the struggling field of selective catalysis. The technology is
able to create binding sites with desired templates that are comparable to natural antibodies.
To fabricate molecular imprinting, the template and functional monomers are first allowed
to form a self-assembled architecture, in which the functional monomers are regularly
positioned around the template. Polymerization is then performed to fix the self-organized
architecture in place, followed by removal of the imprinted template from the polymeric
networks, which then leaves behind binding sites stereochemically complementary to the
imprinted template. The binding sites left behind constitute an induced molecular memory of
the template, which then endows the resulting polymers (i.e., molecular imprinted polymers
[MIPs]) with molecular recognition ability.
For use in catalysis, the prepared MIPs are expected to have the ability to stabilize the
transition state of reactants, decreasing the activation energy of the ongoing reactions. As
such, the use of a template analogous to the transition state of the reactants (also known as
the TSA template) should allow the objective to be achieved. The other way to achieve
selective catalytic ability is to use MIPs as the carrier of active metals. The imprinted
networks will provide regulated access to the imprinted substrate, which allows only the
specified substrate to gain access and denies access to analogues. Compared with biogenic
antibodies, MIPs are highly cross-linked and have the advantages of easy preparation,
reusability, and robustness under chemical and physical stresses. Hence, MIPs can be
used under harsh conditions to resist elevated temperature and pressure and to resist
acids, bases, metal ions, organic solvents, etc. Arguably, molecular imprinting technology is
furnishing a revolutionary transition to the conventional recognition of catalysts, pro-
foundly changing our understanding of the basic concept of catalysis.
xxi
xxii PREFACE
Edited by
Prof. Songjun Li, PhD
Distinguished Professor, Jiangsu University, China (Lsjchem@ujs.edu.cn)
Jiangsu Distinguished Professor, Jiangsu Province
President, Chinese Advanced Materials Society
Marie Curie Fellow, European Commission
Prof. Shunsheng Cao, PhD
Associate Professor, Jiangsu University, China (sscao@ujs.edu.cn)
Secretary-General, the Chinese Advanced Materials Society
Marie Curie Fellow, European Commission
Prof. Sergey A. Piletsky, PhD
Professor, University of Leicester, UK (sp523@le.ac.uk)
Secretary-General, the International Union of Advanced Materials
Prof. Anthony P.F. Turner, PhD, DSC, FRSC
Professor, Linköping University, Sweden (anthony.turner@liu.se)
Foreign Associate, USA National Academy of Engineering
Fellow, the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Science
Fellow, the Royal Society of Chemistry
1
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for
Enzyme-like Catalysis: Principle,
Design, and Applications
1. Introduction
Catalysis has been at the forefront of intense research owing to its importance in a broad
range of applications ranging from industry to agriculture, aerospace to aviation, envi-
ronment to ecology, military to civilian purposes, and inanimate objects to living bodies
(1–3). Emerging challenges associated with increasing demands for selective catalysis
have fueled an essential need for novel catalytic materials. Over the past few years,
impressive progress has been made in this field by adopting new design methods and
polymer supports. It appears possible that selective catalysts can be prepared with
careful control of active specimens, catalytic binding sites, or polymer supports (4, 5).
Nonetheless, it remains a significant challenge to acquire a generic protocol suitable for
the development of selective catalytic materials. One reason may be the lower structural
complexity and simplicity of these reported catalysts compared with the elaborate
structures in enzyme or other active biomacromolecules. In fact, it is almost impossible
to build a well-tuned relationship between the structures of these conventional catalysts
and their selective catalytic ability in a straightforward manner, based on these reported
findings (6). As such, a natural approach to achieve selective catalysis would be to
translate the principle of enzyme catalysis for the design of new catalytic materials
(known also as artificial enzyme analogues). These new catalytic materials might be
synthesized to possess high catalytic activity and selectivity comparable to enzymes.
They might also be better accessible and more stable, and catalyze a larger variety of
reactions. The most prominent is the so-called “molecularly imprinted polymers”
(MIPs), which are capable of creating active binding sites and selectivity comparable to
enzymes (7, 8). To some extent, the use of MIPs as catalysts offers an opportunity for the
characteristics of enzyme catalysis to be studied in a greater detail by systematically
varying functional groups in active sites. This can help us gain a better understanding of
the selective essence of catalytic processes.
The term “molecular imprinting” has been used for some time (at least since the
late 1960s) to describe the induced molecular recognition by stamping the impression
of molecules into a polymeric network, recording a chemical and stereochemical
negative image of the template molecule in the process (9–11). A more complete
definition of molecular imprinting can be described as the template-induced forma-
tion of specific recognition sites in a material in which the template directs the
positioning and orientation of the material’s structural components by a self-assembly
mechanism. The material itself could be oligomeric, polymeric, or a two-dimensional
surface assembly. To be useful in a technological sense, the imprints should be fixed
by a polymerization, cross-linking, precipitation, or condensation process that ce-
ments the relative positions of the structural components before separation or removal
of the template species. The imprinting process is thus recognized as a tool to produce
a range of materials with biomimetic recognition properties (12–15). Compared with
biogenic molecular recognition systems such as antibody–antigen, enzyme–substrate,
and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)–complementary DNA, MIPs are highly cross-linked
polymers and usually have the merits of easy preparation, reusability, and robust-
ness to chemical and physical stresses. Thus, as a promising substitute of bio-
molecules, MIPs can be used under harsh conditions to resist elevated temperature
and pressure and resist acids, bases, metal ions, organic solvents, etc. For these rea-
sons, MIPs have shown much use as in separation, adsorption, sensing, and drug
delivery (16–18).
For catalytic applications, MIPs are normally expected to show an ability to stabilize
the transition state of chemical reactions, decreasing the activation energy of the
ongoing reaction. Thus, the use of a template analogous to the transition state of the
reaction would allow this objective to be achieved (19, 20). Nonetheless, it has been
also discovered that straight use of the reactant or product as the template can achieve
the same selective catalytic objective in some cases (21). One more way to achieve
selective catalytic ability could be the use of MIPs as the support for active metal
nanoparticles (22, 23). The imprinted networks will provide access to the imprinted
substrate, but restrict and/or block the analogues. Despite some different conditions
in a range of cases, the paradigm of MIP–substrate interactions is similar to the
binding interactions between enzyme and substrate, which consist of electrostatic
interactions, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, or a combination of these
interactions. Thus, one key issue in preparing MIP catalysts would be to ensure the
particular arrangement of functional groups and the suitable MIPs–substrate interac-
tion. The arrangement of binding sites and the shape of the active specimens should
be complementary to the structure of the intended substrate. As such, the substrate
can be bound and catalyzed in a selective way. Such binding of the substrate would
Chapter 1 • Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Enzyme-like Catalysis 3
FIGURE 2 Covalent molecular imprinting proposed by Wulff. Where the template phenyl-a-D-mannopyranoside
was be removed from (a) with water or methanol to give (b). Solvation of the functional groups leads to swelling
of the cavity (c). When the template binds again, the original shape is restored. Adapted from Ref. ( 31).
16 MOLECULARLY IMPRINTED CATALYSTS
26. Wulff, G. Enzyme-Like Catalysis by MIPs. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1–27.
27. Zheng, M.; Li, S.; Luo, X. Rationally Designing MIP toward a High Specific Adsorbent by Using Metal
as Assembled Pivot. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 44, 1187–1194.
28. Ge, Y.; Turner, A. P. F. Too Large to Fit? Recent Developments in Macromolecular Imprinting. Trends
Biotechnol. 2008, 26 (4), 218–224.
29. Andersson, L. I. Molecular Imprinting for Drug Bioanalysis - A Review on the Application of Imprinted
Polymers to Solid-phase Extraction and Binding Assay. J. Chromatogr. B 2000, 739, 163–173.
30. Chen, X.; Zhang, Z. H.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y. N.; Li, J. X.; Peng, M. J.; Yao, S. Z. Novel MIPs Based on
Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Bifunctional Monomers for Solid-Phase Extraction of Rhein
from the Root of Kiwi Fruit. J. Sept. Sci. 2012, 35, 2414–2421.
31. Wulff, G.; Sarhan, A. The Use of Polymers with Enzyme-Analogous Structures for the Resolution of
Racemates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1972, 11, 341.
32. Arshady, R.; Mosbach, K. Synthesis of Substrate-Selective Polymers by Host-Guest Polymerization.
Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1981, 182, 687–692.
33. Sellergren, B.; Lepistö, M.; Mosbach, K. Highly Enantioselective and Substrate-Selective Polymers
Obtained by Molecular Imprinting Utilizing Noncovalent Interactions - NMR and Chromatographic
Studies on the Nature of Recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5853–5860.
34. Osmani, Q.; Hughes, H.; Flavin, K.; Hedin-Dahlstrom, J.; Allender, C.; Frisby, J.; McLoughlin, P. The
Use of FTIR and NMR Spectroscopies to Study Prepolymerization Interactions in Nitrogen
Heterocycles. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 1229–1236.
35. Dhal, P. K.; Arnold, F. H. Substrate Selectivity of MIPs Incorporating a Rigid Chelating Monomer, bis-
Methacrylato (4-Methyl, 40 -Vinyl) 2,20 -Bipyridine Cu(II). New. J. Chem. 1996, 20, 695–698.
36. Svenson, J.; Andersson, H. S.; Piletsky, S. A.; Nicholls, I. A. Spectroscopic Studies of the Molecular
Imprinting Self-assembly Process. J. Mol. Recognit. 1998, 11, 83–86.
37. Subrahmanyam, S.; Karim, K.; Piletsky, S. A. Computational Approaches in the Design of Synthetic
Receptors. In Designing Receptors for the Next Generation of Biosensors; Piletsky, S. A.,
Whitcombe, M. J., Eds.; Springer Series on Chemical Sensors and Biosensors; Springer: Berlin,
Heidelberg, 2013, Vol. 12; pp 131–165.
38. Chianella, I.; Lotierzo, M.; Piletsky, S. A.; Tothill, I. E.; Chen, B. N.; Karim, K.; Turner, A. P. F. Rational
Design of a Polymer Specific for Microcystin-LR Using a Computational Approach. Anal. Chem.
2002, 74, 1288–1293.
39. Karlsson, B. C. G.; O’Mahony, J.; Karlsson, J. G.; Bengtsson, H.; Eriksson, L. A.; Nicholls, I. A. Structure
and Dynamics of Monomer-Template Complexation: An Explanation for MIP Recognition Site
Heterogeneity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13297–13304.
40. Wangchareansak, T.; Sangma, C.; Choowongkomon, K.; Dickert, F.; Lieberzeit, P. Surface Molecular
Imprints of WGA Lectin as Artificial Receptors for Mass-Sensitive Binding Studies. Anal. Bioanal.
Chem. 2011, 400, 2499–2506.
41. Nicholls, I. A.; Andersson, H. S. Thermodynamic Principles Underlying MIP Formulation and Ligand
Recognition. In MIPs: Man-made Mimics of Antibodies and Their Applications in Analytical
Chemistry; Sellergren, B., Ed.; Techniques and Instrumentation in Analytical Chemistry; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 2001, Vol. 23; pp 60–70.
42. Salian, V. D.; Vaughan, A. D.; Byrne, M. E. The Role of Living/Controlled Radical Polymerization in
the Formation of Improved Imprinted Polymers. J. Mol. Recognit. 2012, 25, 361–369.
43. Wulff, G.; Gross, T.; Schonfeld, R. Enzyme Models Based on Molecurlarly Imprinted Polymers with
Strong Esterase Activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 1961–1964.
44. Sellergren, B.; Shea, K. J. Enantioselective Ester Hydrolysis Catalyzed by Imprinted Polymers.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 1403–1406.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
which I published at the time.
9
Contemporary Review, October, 1911, p. 569.
10
Contemporary Review, January, 1912, p. 111.
11
Contemporary Review, January, 1912, p. 114.
12
Contemporary Review, April, 1912, p. 566.
13
Contemporary Review, April, 1914, p. 571–2.
14
One of my last articles on this subject appeared in the July
issue of the Contemporary Review.
15
The general strike, accompanied in places by riots, a few
months ago.
16
Contemporary Review, July, 1914, p. 122–128.
17
Daily Telegraph, July 25th, 1914.
18
Cf. Sir M. de Bunsen’s Despatch, July 29th, to Sir Edward
Grey, with White Paper.
19
Ibidem.
20
Cf. White Paper. Sir M. de Bunsen’s Despatch, July 30th.
21
White Paper. Sir M. de Bunsen’s Despatch, July 30th.
22
See White Paper. Despatch sent by Sir G. Buchanan, July
30th.
23
White Paper. Despatch sent by the British Ambassador in St.
Petersburg, dated July 27th.
24
Sir Edward Grey’s Despatch, July 29th.
25
Cf. Sir M. de Bunsen’s Despatch dated London, Sept 1st.
26
The Kaiser was then addressing his soldiers.
27
Monday, August 3rd.
28
Friday, July 31st, 1914.
29
White Paper. Despatch of British Ambassador in Berlin, dated
July 29th.
30
White Paper. Sir G. Buchanan’s Despatch, July 30th.
31
July 29th.
32
White Paper. Sir Edward Goschen’s Despatch, July 29th.
33
Literally “danger of war.”
34
July 31st.
35
July 31st.
36
August 1st.
37
Daily Telegraph.
38
Le Soir, August 9th; La Metropole, August 8th, 1914.
39
Westminster Gazette, September 22nd.
40
Westminster Gazette, September 18th.
41
Ibidem.
Transcriber’s Notes
Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent
when a predominant preference was found in the original book;
otherwise they were not changed.
Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced
quotation marks were remedied when the change was obvious,
and otherwise left unbalanced.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A SCRAP OF
PAPER ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.