Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) The New Class Society Goodbye American Dream Fourth Edition Earl Wysong Indiana University Kokomo Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) The New Class Society Goodbye American Dream Fourth Edition Earl Wysong Indiana University Kokomo Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-american-cancer-society-new-
healthy-eating-cookbook-fourth-edition-jeanne-besser/
https://textbookfull.com/product/generation-chef-risking-it-all-
for-a-new-american-dream-karen-stabiner/
https://textbookfull.com/product/rising-dispatches-from-the-new-
american-shore-first-paperback-edition-university-of-south-
alabama/
https://textbookfull.com/product/becoming-a-world-class-
university-the-case-of-king-abdulaziz-university-1st-edition-
osama-tayeb/
Requiem for the American dream the 10 principles of
concentrated wealth power based on the film Requiem for
the American dream First Edition Chomsky
https://textbookfull.com/product/requiem-for-the-american-dream-
the-10-principles-of-concentrated-wealth-power-based-on-the-film-
requiem-for-the-american-dream-first-edition-chomsky/
https://textbookfull.com/product/fundamentals-of-social-research-
fourth-canadian-edition-earl-babbie-and-lance-w-roberts/
https://textbookfull.com/product/little-indiana-jessica-
nunemaker/
https://textbookfull.com/product/chinese-dream-and-practice-in-
zhejiang-society-guangjin-chen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-new-politics-of-class-in-
britain-the-political-exclusion-of-the-working-class-1st-edition-
evans/
The New Class Society
Fourth Edition
R OW M A N & L I T T L E F I E L D P U B L I S H E R S , I N C .
Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic
or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written
permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review.
Perrucci, Robert.
The new class society : goodbye American dream? / Earl Wysong, Robert Perrucci, and
David Wright. — Fourth edition.
pages cm
Revised edition of: The new class society : goodbye American dream? / Robert Perrucci
and Earl Wysong. 3rd ed.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4422-0527-7 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-4422-0528-4 (pbk. : alk.
paper) — ISBN 978-1-4422-0529-1 (electronic) 1. Social classes—United States. 2.
United States—Social conditions—1980– I. Wysong, Earl, 1944– II. Title.
HN90.S6P47 2014
305.50973—dc23 2013012029
™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of
American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper
for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.
Notes 293
Bibliography 345
Index 379
About the Authors 393
FIGURES
vii
TABLES
Spinning social science straw into the gold of an artful narrative is an elusive en-
deavor. Paraphrasing Mark Twain on the power of language, we believe the difference
between a class analysis that reflects an imaginative blend of art and science and one
that lacks this quality is the difference between vivid lightning that illuminates the
social world and the shallow glow of a cell phone screen that lights a single tweet.
This project flashed into being in 1999 with the first edition. At that time, we were
nearly alone in calling attention to the changing class structure, steadily widening
inequalities, and declining opportunities—developments we saw as threatening
the American dream. As we crafted our narrative for this edition, we aspired to re-
capture the lightning evident in that first edition. But it is up to you, our readers,
to determine the extent to which the fourth edition approximates that lofty stan-
dard. We are mindful of the reality that printed works today compete with digital
media products for readers’ attention, time, and favor. To some, books may appear
as quaint, dated, and “old school”; they are sometimes viewed as less glamorous,
less entertaining, and less visually compelling than products of the digital universe.
Recognizing those realities makes us doubly appreciative of readers who chose this
book. We hope its content will convince you that the printed word remains a source
of enduring value in today’s digital world.
The publication of this new edition was facilitated by the efforts and contribu-
tions of many people. In its early stages the project benefited immensely from the
support and vision of the late Alan McClare. As executive editor, Alan encouraged us
to develop a fourth edition that would not just update our earlier work but also, in
ix
many respects, be a new book. He challenged us to imagine a new edition with more
chapters than earlier versions, to develop a bold volume wherein our class analysis ap-
proach would be used to explore an expanded range of inequality issues and examine
new economic, political, social, and cultural developments. Inspired by his vision
and invigorated by our own enthusiasm for crafting a book that would link our
new, class-focused research on recent important issues such as the new economy, the
financial crisis, the political zeitgeist of the Obama era, social mobility, the culture
industry, and many others, we developed an outline for a new edition. At that time,
Alan was as excited by the promise of our new work as we were, but unfortunately
he was unable to see it through to fruition. In recognition of his unwavering support
for our work, we dedicate this edition to his memory
We appreciate the encouragement, support, and assistance of many individuals
associated with Rowman and Littlefield who helped move the fourth edition from
an outline of chapter titles to a completed manuscript. Sarah Stanton was a patient,
supportive force over an extended period of time. As acquisitions editor, Sarah never
wavered in her support for the book even as the project moved through numerous
iterations, encountered unexpected headwinds, and took longer to complete than
expected. Assistant editor Kathryn M. F. Knigge provided timely encouragement,
support, and assistance as the manuscript moved to completion. Production editor
Patricia Stevenson made numerous editorial contributions that added clarity and
precision to the fourth edition; we are indebted to her for her detailed attention to
the manuscript. The authors, however, are responsible for any and all errors or mis-
takes that may remain in the book.
To readers, supporters, and instructors who found earlier editions of the book to
be thoughtful, informative, provocative, and useful, we offer a sincere and vigorous
“thank you!” We are grateful for the observations and compliments many passed
along to us. We are also appreciative of the comments we received from critical read-
ers. The supportive and critical feedback helped improve our work. We look forward
to learning of readers’ reactions to this new edition.
We hope readers will find the book to be an artful and engaging rendering of
class inequality issues. Written, we believe, with thunderclap clarity and imaginative
imagery, its goal is to illuminate—in new and useful ways—the nature, power, and
consequences of America’s increasingly unequal class structure. To learn more, we
invite you to turn the page.
“Occupy Wall Street reminded the country of the deep economic divisions run-
ning through our society, but it appears the only way to keep the issue in the
media discussion is to keep OWS—or some other form of large-scale protest—in
the news.”
—John Knefel, “Bored with Occupy—and Inequality,” Extra! (May 2012): 7
This book is focused on what we and many others believe is the most important so-
cial issue in the United States today: the emergence and entrenchment, over the past
four decades, of a new, increasingly unequal and ever more rigid social class system.
We initially identified, described, and analyzed what we termed the new class society
in the first edition of this book in 1999. Since then, much of our research has been
devoted to enhancing our understanding of the many evolving facets of what we call
America’s “new class system.” Through books, articles, and research papers we have
sought to share our findings with interested readers.1 Our latest exploration of, and
most recent research on, the structures, processes, and consequences of our unequal
class system are contained in this fourth edition of The New Class Society.
We have all been told that compared with other nations, our country is the rich-
est and our economy is the most productive and efficient on earth. But what is less
well known is the extent of inequalities in the rules, policies, and practices that direct
the distribution of highly unequal shares of goods, services, income, and wealth to
Americans. In short, when it comes to producing goods and services, America is
indeed “Number One!” But when it comes to fairly distributing the goods, services,
income, and wealth generated by our enormously productive and wealthy society,
America is not “Number One.”
The explanation for the disparity between our highly productive society and
a more equitable distribution of its rewards lies, we believe, in the multifaceted
influence of the new class system. The main structural and dynamic features of this
system, explored in the following chapters, include the following: (1) the central
importance of large corporations and powerful policy-making government organiza-
tions to the creation and maintenance of an increasingly caste-like social class system;
(2) the mobilization of enormous economic and political resources by wealthy elites,
advocacy organizations representing their interests, and large corporations to facili-
tate, via corporate and governmental policies, an upward redistribution of income
and wealth to the most affluent classes; (3) the intensification of social-class-based
economic, political, and cultural inequalities via forty years of class-war policies
directed by the wealthiest classes against the middle and working classes; (4) the
increasing polarization of the United States into two distinct “have” and “have not”
classes; (5) the perpetuation and legitimation of our unequal class system by several
conventional social institutions, including federal and state governments, large
corporations, the corporate media, and the culture industry. As we will see, these
features, along with various economic, political, and social developments related to
and spawned by them, have exerted, and continue to exert, profound effects on the
lives and life chances of all Americans.
In sociology, the term social classes, as we note in chapter 1, refers to the organiza-
tion of societies into stratified “layers” or “ranks” with each class (or rank) consisting
of large numbers of people who possess similar levels of what are considered scarce
and valuable resources in a given society. While the term resources can be thought
of as taking many forms (e.g., power, education, occupation, opportunities, health),
in advanced industrial societies the quantity of money people possess as wealth or
receive as income is a critical “scarce and valuable” resource. Thus, the quantity of
money people have is central to the general meaning of social class as a concept
and to people’s social class rankings in our society. Money, however, is not the only
feature of social class, and it is not the only resource included in definitions of it. As
we’ll see in chapter 2, within sociology, social class has been defined differently by
different scholars. And although our definition of social class does include money
as a crucial resource, it includes other key resources as well (see chapter 2). But for
our purposes in this introduction, the quantity of money people have, used here to
represent the economic dimension of social class, provides a convenient and familiar
way of referencing and measuring one crucial aspect of social class membership and
related class inequalities.
In America’s highly unequal class system, the concept of class inequalities includes
the idea that not only do people in different social classes possess unequal levels
of resources but these inequalities also lead to very unequal lives. In short, class
inequalities, especially wealth and income differences, have powerful and enduring
effects on people’s opportunities and life experiences. The quantity of money people
in different social classes have (in amounts such as large, modest, small, none)
means people are substantially advantaged or disadvantaged in several ways (e.g.,
educational and occupational opportunities, access to health care, ability to influence
government policies). The greater the quantity of money one has, the greater one’s
“life chances” for living a secure, long, happy, healthy, and rewarding life—and vice
versa.2 This does not mean that lots of money buys happiness. It means that having
more money provides people with more opportunities, resources, and chances to pur-
sue and achieve whatever they determine to be important goals in their lives. But we
don’t all have to be rich to enjoy an abundance of positive life chances. A large and
growing body of research finds that societies with greater levels of equality produce
higher levels of both mental and physical well-being among all people in all classes
than more unequal societies. At the same time, people in more equal societies are less
stressed, more trusting of others, and commit far fewer violent crimes than people in
more unequal societies.3 The evidence is clear: class inequalities matter for individu-
als and societies.4 This reality underscores the importance of better understanding
our unequal class system.
Chapter 2 describes the distinctive form of our new class system as essentially
bipolar. It includes an affluent and secure privileged class and an increasingly impov-
erished and insecure new working class. Chapter 2 also identifies four important prin-
ciples that define the new class system. These four principles are explored at length
in chapters 3, 4, 5, and 6. As we will see, in this new class system, most people are
members, or soon will be members, of the new working class—the class of people
increasingly excluded from the likelihood of realizing or experiencing highly positive
life chances. The once-upon-a-time traditionally large and secure American middle
class is mostly absent in the new class system. Chapters 5 and 6 explore how and
why the demise of the middle class has been hastened by a number of developments
and inequality trends driven by corporate and government policies orchestrated by
and for the wealthiest classes.
“More than three-quarters of Americans . . . say that they believe in the American
Dream.”
—Michael Ford et al., The Modern American Dream (August 2011)
“That’s why they call it the American dream; you have to be asleep to believe it.”
—George Carlin, Sacramento Bee (December 2, 2005)
Some readers may wonder: Why do we need to explore the structures and dynamics
of what we claim is an increasingly unequal new class system rife with structured
class inequalities when, as many believe, we live in a society that routinely provides
people with ample opportunities to achieve educational and economic success if they
work hard and follow the rules? It’s a good question. After all, as the first quote above
indicates, a large majority of people in the United States today say they believe in
the American dream—the belief, generally, that hard work leads to success. However,
the second quote suggests we may need to be cautious. It implies that achieving the
dream is not such a certain prospect. If that is not the case, then why not? Prudence
suggests this question merits attention—especially if we suspect the certainty of the
dream is “oversold.”
From our perspective, the American dream of financial security and upward mo-
bility stands in opposition to what we term the “iceberg” of the new class system.
Thought of this way, the U.S. class structure, like an iceberg, consists of not only
readily visible features and obvious inequalities but also a much larger mass of par-
tially concealed, or even “hidden,” components, including a wide array of structured
class inequalities. As metaphors, these concepts call attention to and remind us of
potent tensions that exist in our society between the cultural ideals and social realities
associated with the U.S. class system. The dream represents a widely shared cultural
ideal—what most Americans believe should be true about class-related opportunities
and achievement in our society. The iceberg, however, represents the social reality
of what is true regarding these qualities in our society—that they are battered and
blunted by the iceberg-like reality of partially exposed, but largely hidden, patterned,
enduring, and increasing class inequalities embedded in the new class system. These
separate realities are threaded through the American social fabric as well as the lives
and life chances of each of us. While the dream inspires optimism and hope for
a brighter future, the iceberg, especially its hidden components and inequalities,
grinds away at the dream, generating, as we will see, increasingly bleak life chances,
opportunities, and experiences for most Americans.
The foundation of the American dream, a term coined by historian James Truslow
Adams during the Great Depression, rests on the belief that humble class origins are
not destiny.5 It includes the widely shared view that American society offers equal
and nearly unlimited opportunities for upward mobility for those who embrace a
strong work ethic, regardless of class origins.6 Although the details of the American
dream have varied somewhat over time, Americans—from the post-WWII period to
the present—typically envision it as including financial security, home ownership,
family, higher educational levels (leading to upward mobility), greater opportunities
and rewards for the next generation (compared with the current generation), a suc-
cessful career, freedom, happiness, and a comfortable retirement.7
In the 1920s and 1930s, the “modern American dream” (grounded in the growth
of a secure middle class after World War II) was not yet part of the culture.8 Today, of
course, it is, but the ideals of the dream are increasingly at odds with the inequality
patterns of the emerging new class system—which, in many respects, are similar to
those evident in the 1920s and 1930s. As we note in chapter 1, the U.S. class structure
during the Great Depression resembled a pyramid with limited mobility across class
lines. Class membership in such a system was typically defined by family lineage—
“The fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree.” Prior to the first three decades of the post–
World War II period (1945–1975), this aphorism linking children, parents, and
social class stood at the intersection of commonsense observations and social science
research.9 From wealthy elites to white trash, personal experiences, popular culture,
and sociological data supported the view that social class tended to “run in families.”
Following World War II, as chapter 1 points out, the pyramidal class structure
of the 1930s began to change as real wages (adjusted for inflation) began trending
upward for working-class Americans. At the same time, the postwar period witnessed
improving opportunities for advancement from the working class into more presti-
gious occupations.10 For members of the expanding blue- and white-collar middle-
income groups of the 1950s and 1960s, these new patterns provided a reassuring vi-
sion of a comfortable and secure future for themselves and their children. Improved
living standards combined with traditional beliefs in the open-ended economic and
social opportunities in America contributed to an enthusiastic, shared embrace of the
modern American dream as a cultural ideal among members of virtually all social
classes.11
Somewhat paradoxically, the dream runs both parallel with and counter to the
general pattern evident in the United States today whereby children tend to replicate
the class rank of their parents (a topic explored in chapter 5). For privileged-class
families, the dream offers a reassuring sense of continuity: the advantaged posi-
tions of parents can and will be passed on to, and extended by, their children. For
working-class families, the dream represents a possible future of reward, fulfillment,
and affluence, especially for their children. To some extent, the first thirty years of
the post-WWII period provided middle-income workers and families with evidence
that the dream was increasingly within reach. Thus, among the working and middle
classes, the modern American dream resonated powerfully as a mythic cultural ideal
and, at least for a time, as an attainable reality. Today, however, the opportunities
once available to working-class Americans for realizing the dream are being shredded
by powerful economic, political, and social forces that are part of the “iceberg” of the
new class system—an iceberg of epic proportions and potency that spans the entire
society and threatens to destroy the American dream.
Like a huge iceberg stretching coast to coast across the American social horizon,
the new class system combines a dramatic profile of sharply defined and disturbing
visible features with a submerged and hidden mass of potentially society-wrecking
forces and consequences. While we appreciate Americans’ interest in and attraction
to the dream, we believe a close examination of the “iceberg” of the new class system
the reality that the production and corresponding occupational structures are much
more complex today than they were in the 1880s.7 Recent sociological variations of
this approach move beyond the two-class model to produce a multilevel image of
class structure with a relatively short list of levels or classes. However, unlike the im-
age of classes shading into one another because of gradually shifting economic and
lifestyle differences, Marxian production models view the class structure as more
sharply divided by inequalities that reflect people’s positions in the production pro-
cess. In these models, classes are typically based on occupational categories such as
owners, managers, small employers, semiautonomous employees, and hourly wage
workers. In each instance, class position is based on a person’s location in the produc-
tion process—which also closely corresponds to the possession of income and wealth
and to the occupational roles people perform. Owners (big and small) set policy and
control the production process; managers assist owners and act as “order givers” who
oversee the production process and often accumulate portions of productive wealth
themselves; workers are “order takers” and typically do not share in the ownership of
productive wealth (or at most own only very small portions); the poor are excluded
from both ownership and most forms of desirable work. This model acknowledges
the existence of conflicting class interests and examines the strategies used by owners
and managers to pressure workers into accepting lower wages or less desirable work-
ing conditions.
The functionalist model was partly inspired by Max Weber’s view that social strati-
fication is a complex, multidimensional phenomenon and cannot be understood on
the basis of a single factor, like a person’s position in the production process. Unlike
the Marxian production model, in which ownership and control (or the lack of it)
are critical to producing the class structure (and defining class), Weber believed that
inequality existed along two different dimensions of social life, which he called class
and status.8 According to Weber, class positions reside in the economic order and
are based on a person’s relationship to the market; there are propertied classes and
nonpropertied classes. The propertied classes own land and the means of production
and receive rent and profits in the marketplace. The nonpropertied class is made up
of skilled and unskilled workers who sell their labor power at values determined by
the supply and demand for labor.
Weber’s view of class positions bears some resemblance to Marx’s production
model, but Weber did not stop with the analysis of class, because he argued that in
addition to the economic order, there is a social order composed of status groups.
Status groups are based on the prestige associated with one’s style of life, including
their values, beliefs, associations, and consumption behavior. Status groups exist in-
dependent of class groups, and it is possible for the same family to have a high class
position and also be in a low status group.
The Weberian view of classes and status groups introduced the distinction be-
tween an “economic class” and a “cultural class.” An economic class in both the
production and functionalist models emphasized groupings of people with similar
occupations, income, and educational levels. Although the production model might
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.