IMAM 2011 XIV Congress of The International Maritime Association of The Mediterranean

IMAM 2011
XIV Congress of the

International Maritime
Association of the Mediterranean Università di
Genova 12-16 September 2011 Genova
Motion calculations for fishing vessels with a time domain panel

code
R. Datta, J. M. Rodrigues and C. Guedes Soares
Centre for Marine Technology and Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical
University of Lisbon, Portugal
Contents
Introduction
Motivation and Objective
Brief discussion on mathematical formulation
Dealing with numerical instability
Results and discussion
Conclusion
IMAM 2011
Genoa, September 13th -16th 2011
Introduction
Prediction of wave induced motions and sea loads with the best possible
accuracy is very important in ship design.
Large motions affect operability and safety while large loads can cause
structural damages
IMAM 2011
Introduction cont…..
• Available numerical schemes:
 2D Strip theory (Salvensen, Tuck, Faltinsen)

 3D Frequency domain panel method (WAMIT)
 3D Rankine panel method (SWAN)
 3D Time domain panel method (TiMIT, TD)
IMAM 2011
Motivation
• Fishing vessels hull forms diverge significantly from the ones of

container ship or large cargo ship
• Smaller in length
• Comparatively high Froude number
• different L/B ratios, block coefficient
• Cross coupling terms are very important
IMAM 2011
Motivation Continued…….
Previously studied large ships with the panel code
IMAM 2011
Motivation Continued…….
Presently studied fishing vessels with the panel code
IMAM 2011
Motivation continued…..
• The computational scheme proposed by Datta and Sen (2007) shows

good agreement with other published results for large ships
• But it has been found to give inadequate results when fishing vessels
are considered
• Therefore, there is a need to introduce some modifications in the

scheme, to go beyond such restrictions.
IMAM 2011
Objective
• Detect numerical Instability
• Develop and Incorporate numerical scheme in order to remove the

instability
• Compare with other results for validation
In order to do that, lower order panel method is taken for the solution
purpose
IMAM 2011
Brief Mathematical Formulation
  
T ( X , t )  I ( X , t )   ( X , t )
 
  ( X ; t )  0;
2
X 
 2   I
g  0 ;z  0  Vn  ; on S0
t 2
z n n
  0 as RH  , on z  0
 ,  0 ; t  0
IMAM 2011
Brief Mathematical Formulation continued…..
G( p, t , q, )  G 0  G f when p  q; t  
 ( p; t ) 1   Gt f ( p, q; t   )
t
G 0 ( p, q )
    (q, t ) dS   d    (q, t ) dS
n p 4  S0 ( t ) n p  S0 ( ) n p
 0
1 Gt f ( p, q; t   )  
   ( q, t ) VNVn dL  
g  ( ) n p  
1  t 
 ( p, t )      (q, t )G ( p, q )dS   d    (q, t )Gt ( p, q; t   )dS
o f
4  S0 ( )
 S0 ( t ) 0
1 
   (q, t )Gt ( p, q; t   )VNVn dL  
f
g  ( ) 
IMAM 2011
Significant changes in the panel code
Hydrostatic Forces:
 
FStatic  c.x (t )
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 

0 0  gAwp 0   gM wp 0
c 
0 0 0  g GM T 0 0
 
0 0   gM wp 0  g GM L 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 
IMAM 2011
Significant changes in the panel code continued…
• Solution for equation of motion
First Step
 *  t    t 

t t
*  * (t )  *  * (t )
FD (t )    .n dS , M D  t     .  X   n  dS
S0
t S0
t
*  1 *  
Vb  t  t   Vb (t ) 
M

f FT  t  , FT  t  t  ,.., FT  t  nt  
*  *  

X b  t  t   X b (t )  f Vb  t  t  , Vb  t  ,...,Vb  t  mt 
IMAM 2011
Second Step
  t    t     t  t 

t t
  (t )    (t )
FD (t )    .n dS , M D  t     .  X   n  dS
S0
t S0
t
 predicted  1   
Vb  t  t   Vb (t ) 
 
M

f FT  t  , FT  t  t  ,.., FT  t  nt  
 predicted

f  t  t   b
V  t  t   Vb  t 
t
 
FT  t  t    M  f  t  t 
  1   
Vb  t  t   Vb (t ) 
M
f FT  t  t  , FT  t  t  ,.., FT  t  mt  
    

X b  t  t   X b (t )  f Vb  t  t  ,Vb  t  ,...,Vb  t  mt  
IMAM 2011
Behavior of the Green’s function near free surface
 the body geometry of such vessels is modified near the waterline,

assuming that the validity of the computed response of the ship is
not affected significantly.
 The procedure consists in artificially adding a row of relatively small

vertical panels at the waterline .
IMAM 2011
Numerical Implementation ( Evaluation of
the Greens Function )
g ˆ
G  p, t , q,   G  ,   (4.35)
r 
IMAM 2011
IMAM 2011
IMAM 2011
IMAM 2011
IMAM 2011
IMAM 2011
Results (WigLey Hull)
(5x5) B-spline
(7x7) B-spline
2.25
1.50
0.75
x3( t)/a
0.00
-0.75
-1.50
-2.25
0 10 20 30 40 50
t
IMAM 2011
Results
2.25
1.50
0.75
X3(t ) /a
0.00
-0.75
-1.50
-2.25
0 50 100 150 200
IMAM 2011
Results
3
B-spline
SWAN
Strip theory
Experiment
2
Ix3I/a
0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
/L
IMAM 2011
Results (Series 60 )
B-spline
SWAN
1.5 Strip theory
Experimen
1.0
IX3I/a
0.5
0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
L
IMAM 2011
Results (Series 175 )
B-spline
SWAN
1.5 Strip theory
Experimen
1.0
IX3I/a
0.5
0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
L
IMAM 2011
Wigley Hull
2
x3 ( t )
-2
-4
0 15 30 45 60 75
t/T0
IMAM 2011
IMAM 2011
N
Dealing with numerical instability cont…
IMAM 2011
N
tT
 Lbp  6.28
SPEAKER’S
IMAM 2011
- 30 - Affiliation
LOGO
Results and Discussions…
[m] [m] [m] [mT]
Designation LBP B(moulded) D(moulded) ∆
FV1 15 5.4 2.4 104.9
FV2 22 5.8 1.6 94.7
FV3 20 7.4 3.4 302.9
FV4 63 13 6.17 3146.5
FV5 63 13.1 5.61 2923.4
IMAM 2011
Results and Discussions…
speed  0 speed  8 knot speed  16 knot
IMAM 2011 FV4

Results and Discussions continued…
IMAM 2011 FV4

IMAM 2011 FV4

speed  0
IMAM 2011 FV5

speed  16 knot
IMAM 2011 FV5

Conclusions
• The present method is more generic and appears to be
more robust and efficient
• Results are agree very well with WAMIT for zero speed
which validate the correctness of the present development
at least for zero speed
• From the results, it may be concluded again that for the

heave motions, the slenderness property is important for
the strip theory in the low speed situations, but gradually
the forward speed effect becomes the dominated factor as
speed increased.
IMAM 2011
IMAM 2011

IMAM 2011 XIV Congress of The International Maritime Association of The Mediterranean

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

IMAM 2011 XIV Congress of The International Maritime Association of The Mediterranean

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IMAM 2011

XIV Congress of the

Motion calculations for fishing vessels with a time domain panel

• Available numerical schemes:

 2D Strip theory (Salvensen, Tuck, Faltinsen)

• Fishing vessels hull forms diverge significantly from the ones of

• Comparatively high Froude number

• different L/B ratios, block coefficient

• Cross coupling terms are very important

Previously studied large ships with the panel code

Presently studied fishing vessels with the panel code

• The computational scheme proposed by Datta and Sen (2007) shows

• Therefore, there is a need to introduce some modifications in the

• Develop and Incorporate numerical scheme in order to remove the

• Compare with other results for validation

Behavior of the Green’s function near free surface

 the body geometry of such vessels is modified near the waterline,

 The procedure consists in artificially adding a row of relatively small

0 50 100 150 200

Dealing with numerical instability cont…

[m] [m] [m] [mT]

Designation LBP B(moulded) D(moulded) ∆

FV1 15 5.4 2.4 104.9

FV2 22 5.8 1.6 94.7

FV3 20 7.4 3.4 302.9

FV4 63 13 6.17 3146.5

FV5 63 13.1 5.61 2923.4

speed  0 speed  8 knot speed  16 knot

IMAM 2011 FV4

speed  0 speed  8 knot speed  16 knot

IMAM 2011 FV4

speed  0 speed  8 knot speed  16 knot

IMAM 2011 FV4

IMAM 2011 FV5

IMAM 2011 FV5

• From the results, it may be concluded again that for the

You might also like