Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jennifer Slade
B.Sc (Hon), M.Sc Candidate
Outline
• Model organism • Neurological disorders
– Definition – Triple-repeat diseases
– Current models – Parkinson disease
– Characterisitics of a “good” – Familial Alzheimer disease
model organism?
– Fragile X
• Drosophila as a model
organism • Cancer
– Characteristics – RTK-RAS-MAPK signaling
– Uses in Research – Targets of Rapamycin pathway
• Developmental disorders – Cell cycle control
– Conserved genes, similar – Tumour metastasis
functions • Limitations of fly models
– Conserved genes, different
functions
• Summary
Definition of Model Organism
• Specific species or organism
• Extensively studied in research laboratories
• Advance our understanding of
– Cellular function
– Development
– Disease
• Ability to apply new knowledge to other
organisms
Current Models
• Drosophila
• Xenopus
• Zebrafish
• Mouse
• C. elegans
• Yeast
• E. coli
• Arabidopsis
Characteristics of a
“Good” Model Organism
• Think individually
– Make jot notes
– 5 to 10 minutes
• Share in groups
– Get in groups of 4
– Discuss various characteristics
• Share with the class
– One person from each group write one characteristic
discussed on board
– Explain why characteristic is beneficial
Drosophila melanogaster
as a model organism
Characteristics of Drosophila that
make it a good model organism
• Small, easy and cheap to maintain
and manipulate
• Short lifespan
• Produce large numbers of offspring
• Development is external
• Availability of mutants
• Lots of history/previous
experiments and discoveries
• Genome is sequenced
• Homologues for at least 75 % of
human disease genes
• Exhibit complex behaviours
• Fewer ethical concerns
Drosophila in Research
• Early research aided in the understanding of
development
– Made first link between chromosome and phenotype
– Identified various genes and mechanisms of
development
• Current research focuses on the study of human
disease
– Developmental disorders
– Neurological disorders
– Cancer
Technique: Second site modifier screen
• Begin with a fly posessing a mutant phenotype
• Create random mutations that might effect this phenotype in this
genetic background
– Via radiation or feeding of a mutagen
– Observe offspring or “grandoffspring” for either less or much more severe
phenotype
• Some might be revertants of the original gene
• Others might be mutants for upstream or downstream components of
the pathway(s)
that lead to the original phenotype
• Rarely, there might be mutants of a gene
with a compensational function.
• These are second site mutants.
Human Disease :
Developmental Disorders
• Dysmorphologies
– Diseases resulting in morphological defects
– Largest, most prevalent human genetic disorders
• Result from mutations in genes that control
important steps in development, such as:
– Transcription factors
– Proteins involved in signal transduction
• Two broad categories:
– Conserved genes with orthologous function
– Conserved genes having different functions
Conserved genes, Similar functions
• Genes have:
– Homologous functions
– Involved in the development of conserved
structures in both humans and flies
• Mutations in both human
and fly homologues affect
same tissue/cell type
Human gene Drosophila gene Affect when mutated
• Includes:
– Spinobulbar muscular atrophy
– Spinal cerebellar ataxias
– Huntington disease
• Extended consecutive repeat of a codon
– Glutamine encoding triplet CAG
– Leads to neuronal degeneration
– Longer repeats – earlier onset
Neurological disorder: Triple-repeat diseases
• Mutant polyglutamine genes
– induce neuronal degeneration in fly retina
– Mimics retinal degeneration in humans
– Inclusion bodies present with extended CAG repeats
• Discovery of other genes involved in retinal degeneration
– Heat-shock proteins – chaperonins that re-fold misfolded proteins
– protein degradation genes
– histone deacetylation genes
– apoptotic genes
– genes encoding RNA binding proteins
Neurological disorder: Triple-repeat diseases
PTEN
Akt
PI3K
Tsc1 Tsc2
Protein synthesis
And cellular growth
TOR RHEB
Cancer: Cell cycle control
• Cancer sometimes caused by disruption of components
at check points
– Negatively regulate cell cycle under normal conditions
• Drosophila homologues:
– Cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases, E2F genes (enhance cell
cycle progression)
– CDKN2B (decapo), C1B1 (kip) and retinoblastoma protein
(Rb) (inhibit cell cycle progression)
– P53 –downstream, pro-apoptotic effector of E2F genes
• Flies have one copy of these genes
– Vertebrates often have several
Cancer: Cell Cycle Control
• Searching for tumour suppressors in Drosophila leading to
cellular growth (like PTEN)
– Discovered previously unknown negative regulators of cell cycle:
• Warts (WTS or LATS)
• Salvadore (SAV)
• Hippo
• Motivated studies in mice and humans to confirm importance of
new genes in tumourgenesis
– LATS1 mutant mice – tumour overgrowths (like fly)
– Human renal and colon cancer cell lines – mutations in SAV homologue
• Flies help clarify cell cycle control mechanisms and lead to
identification of new genes which may prevent excessive cell
proliferation and cancer
Cancer: Tumour metastasis
• Not observed in wild-type flies
• Instead, study genes involved in regulation of cell
behaviours
– Migration
– Invasion of epithelial sheets
• Show mechanistic similarities to processes involved
in multistep spread of cancer cells
• Normal cells can undergo programmed migrations,
and then invasion of epithelial sheet
– Two distinct steps
Cancer: Tumour metastasis
• Screen to find genes involved in metastasis
– Identified mutations in scribbled (scrib)
• Maintains normal apical/basal cell polarity
• Scrib mutants – overproliferation of cells
– When have both
• Mutated form of Drosophila RAS
• A loss-of-function scrib
– Cells break free and move to other locations
– Migration also seen with notch mutations combined with scrib mutants
– Like mammalian tumours, E-cadherin is downregulated
• Adhesion molecule which would prevent metastasis
• Invasive cancer thus results from distinct steps and separate
processes which can be studied in Drosophila
Limitations of fly models
• Some biological processes evolved in vertebrate lineage only
– Genes involved in creating four-chambered heart
– However, could study genes in specific steps of these processes
• Smaller organism, such as yeast, might be preferred when
studying cell-autonomous functions (ie: DNA repair)
– Shorter generation time, smaller genome, large number of individuals
produced
• Ideal study of human disease might be:
– Parallel analysis of gene at all relevant tiers
• Cell autonoumous effects in yeast
• Multicellular or inductive events mediated by gene in Drosophila
• Accurate disease model and mutations of gene in mice
Summary
• Benefits of Drosophila include:
– Broad spectrum of genes related to human disease already discovered
– Many successful techniques already developed
– Already a powerful tool in study of developmental and neurological
disorders, and cancer
• Future Perpectives:
– Identification of novel genes functioning in disease processes
– Determination of genes contributing to complex disorders
– Exploit the fly to answer already existing questions, and formulate new
hypotheses
• Drosophila is a most effective model:
• More simplicity than vertebrate models
• Greater complexity than yeast or bacteria models
Reference
• Bier, E. 2005. Drosophila, the Golden Bug,
Emerges as a Tool for Human Genetics.
Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 9-23