SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDE in Building Your LDM Practicum Portfolio: Learning Delivery Modalities Course For Teachers

LDM 2
Learning Delivery Modalities Course for Teachers

SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDE in building your
LDM PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
AMELIE A. IHALAS, MT-III

MPCES
LDM 2 Learning Delivery Modalities Course for Teachers
PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO LAC GUIDE
2 KINDS OF ARTIFACTS
(MOV)
1. Required
are artifacts that you have to include in the portfolio
2. Self-Selected
are those that you might consider having in your portfolio to
satisfy the criteria used in assessing it
for teachers
1. REQUIRED
Individual Learning
Monitoring Plan (IMLP)
LDM ARTIFACT (MOV) Lesson Plan

(DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson Exemplars)
Teacher-Made/Modified Materials
for teachers
1. REQUIRED
Certificates of participation in any

professional development (PD)
LDM ARTIFACT (MOV) activities
Reflective Summary
for teachers
2. SELF-SELECTED
MOVs on engaging learners for
their progress and achievement
photo-documentation of
● conversations through chat/text/video
LDM ARTIFACT (MOV) conference about class requirements
● notes or messages as feedback to their
submitted outputs (activity sheets, SLMs,
portfolio,etc.)
● kumustahan/consultation sessions with

learners
NOTE: Blur names and photos of students, parents/guardians to protect their
privacy.
for teachers
2. SELF-SELECTED
MOVs on professional
engagement with colleagues
● socially-distanced in-person/online
LDM ARTIFACT (MOV) synchronous LAC Sessions
● LDM-related LAC chats

(text, messenger, viber, etc)
● faculty meetings
● in-service trainings
for teachers
2. SELF-SELECTED
MOVs on engaging key
stakeholders in the teaching
learning process
LDM ARTIFACT (MOV)
● conversations with parents/guardians
through chat/text/video conference
● parents dropping off modules at

designated school boxes
NOTE: Blur names and photos of students, parents/guardians

to protect their privacy.
TEACHERS
PORTFOLIO CONTENTS aligned with the PPST
AMELIE A. IHALAS, MT-III Learning Delivery Modalities

MPCES Course for Teachers LDM 2
LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

for TEACHERS
REQUIRED

for TEACHERS
REQUIRED
LDM Artifact Remarks PPST

for TEACHERS
REQUIRED

for TEACHERS
REQUIRED

for TEACHERS
REQUIRED

for TEACHERS
SELF-SELECTED

for TEACHERS
SELF-SELECTED

for TEACHERS
SELF-SELECTED
LDM PORTFOLIO ELEMENTS
 Cover/title page
TEACHERS
LAC LEADERS
 Table of Contents
name of the artifact

PPST strand
 Short Annotation
DELETE this page

if you have decided not to include
self-selected artifacts/MOVs
in your practicum portfolio.
How do we rate the

TEACHERS’ LDM PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO?
EVALUATION FORMS
FOR TEACHERS’ LDM PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
LDM FORM 3.2P

LDM Portfolio Evaluation of
Teachers
EVALUATION FORM
Excellent VS S Marginal US
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Demonstration of Progress of
LDM Implementation (30%)
Quality of Reflection (25%)
Demonstration of Professional
Standards (20%)
Language and Overall

presentation of Output (15%)
Organization of Portfolio (5%)
Timeliness (5%)
Demonstration of Progress of LDM Implementation (30%)

The outputs clearly and adequately captured the progress of the
Excellent implementation of the LDM, showing innovations that contribute
(5) to its smooth implementation
Very The outputs adequately captured the progress of the
Satisfactory implementation of the LDM
(4)
Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent the progress of the LDM
(3) implementation
Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited extent the progress of the LDM
(2) implementation
The outputs do not show the progress of the LDM
Unsatisfactory
(1)
implementation
Quality of Reflection (25%)

Reflection describes the experience in the LDM implementation, shows in-depth
Excellent analysis and synthesis, and excellently relates it to the professional standards and to
professional and personal development goals
(5)
Reflection describes the experience in the LDM implementation, shows some
Very analysis, and relates it to the professional standards and to professional and personal
Satisfactory development goals
(4)
Satisfactory Reflection describes the experience and relates them to the professional standards
(3) and personal development goals
Marginal Reflection describes the experience in the implementation of the LDM with limited
(2) attempt to relate it to the professional standards and personal development goals
Unsatisfactory Reflection describes experience in the implementation of the LDM with no attempt to
(1) relate it to the professional standards and personal development goals
Demonstration of Professional Standards (20%)
Excellent
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 or more indicators of
(5) relevant strands in professional standards
Very
Satisfactory The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 indicators of relevant
(4) strands in professional standards
Satisfactory The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 indicators of relevant

Marginal The outputs clearly demonstrate the 2 indicators of relevant

Unsatisfactory The outputs do not demonstrate any indicator in the

(1) professional standards
Language and Overall Presentation of Output (15%)
Excellent The ideas are expressed in clear, coherent, and appropriately- worded
(5) language with no errors in structure and/or writing conventions
Very The ideas are expressed in clear language with very minimal errors in
Satisfactory structure and/or writing conventions
(4)
Satisfactory The ideas are expressed well but with incoherence in some areas and few
errors in structure and/or writing conventions
(3)
Marginal The ideas are expressed using very basic words and structure with
(2) incoherence in many areas and several errors in structure and/or writing
conventions
Unsatisfactory The ideas are jumbled and difficult to understand; errors in structure and
(1) writing conventions are almost everywhere in the output
Organization of Portfolio (5%)
Excellent The portfolio is logically organized, is insightful, and offers new perspective
(5) and insights
Very
Satisfactory The portfolio is logically organized.
(4)
Satisfactory The portfolio is generally well-organized with 1-2 items not well placed in the
(3) overall organization
Marginal
The portfolio has 3-4 items not well placed in the overall organization
(2)
Unsatisfactory
The portfolio does not follow a logical order
(1)
Timeliness (5%)
Excellent The output/s is/are submitted more than 3 days ahead of the deadline
(5)
Very The output/s is/are submitted 1-2 days before the deadline
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory The output/s is/are submitted on the deadline

(3)
Marginal The output/s is/are submitted 1-3 days after the deadline
(2)
Unsatisfactory The output/s is/are submitted more than 3 days after the deadline
(1)
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Can I use my LDM certificate for my

application for
Yes, LDM certificates can be used by any LDM participants in their
application for reclassification/promotion. A memo on this addressed to field
reclassification/promotion? offices has been issued.
2. Can I use my pre-implementation

outputs in my practicum portfolio?
For your pre-implementation portfolio, this should only contain the required
outputs in each module. These outputs are indicated in the course
introduction/overview module also. You are not required to submit your study
notebook.
NEAP released last April the list of required outputs for your practicum
portfolio (as discussed in Module 5 or Module 7)) to guide you in building it.
Visit bit.ly/ldmportfolioeval .Most of these practicum artifacts/MOVs are
outputs that you already have as part of your daily practice, and some can also
be used for your RPMS portfolio this school year. These practicum outputs
are evidence of how you applied what you have learned from the LDM
course.
3. I haven’t received my LDM certificate of

participation. What shall I do?
You may coordinate with your SDO LDM PMT (SGOD-HRDS) as they are
the ones coordinating with the regional LDM PMT (NEAP-R/HRDD). It’s the
region who will issue your LDM certificates of participation and completion.
5. Is it okay not to have self-selected

artifacts/MOVs in our practicum
If you think that the required outputs already sufficiently satisfy the
evaluation criteria, you may do away with the self-selected outputs. Our
portfolio? recommendation is that you still include self-selected outputs from (or even
not from) the list to demonstrate application of learning. But please note that
the portfolio is not a scrapbook where you put everything in it.
6. I am not a supervisor but I served as

Instructional Coach in LDM 2. Which
The practicum portfolio guide for supervisors, including the list of
artifacts/MOVs, is applicable to all coaches regardless of position. If the
practicum portfolio guide should I use? coach is a teacher or school head, this particular role can be used in the RPMS
corresponding to either highly proficient or distinguished career stage. You
just have to match the artifact/MOV to the appropriate strand and career stage
relative to the position of the personnel who served as Instructional Coach but
is not a supervisor.
7. Should I include the study notebook in

my practicum portfolio?
You may still include your study notebook as a self-selected artifact, but it is
advised that you keep it (or a copy of it) as this may be useful when you need
to go back to your own learning notes.
8. What would be the set of practicum

portfolio required artifacts of
Outputs expected from department heads would depend on their participation
in LDM2--either as a school LAC leader or a teacher-participant.
department heads who were not
assigned as LDM2 school LAC If they did not take the pre-implementation part of the LDM 2 course, they are
Leaders? not considered as course participants, hece, are not expected to submit the
practicum portfolio.
9. Can the artifacts submitted for the pre-

implementation modules be used again
Yes, to a certain extent--if you pair it with the updated/improved version to
highlight the learnings you have gained throughout the school year.
in the practicum portfolio?
Ex. Pre-implementation output ILMP/WHLP + Q3/Q4 ILMP/WHLP
10 Is the evaluation rubric for teachers

similar to that for the School LAC
The same set of criteria/rubrics is used in all LDM courses.
. Leaders?
11 I am a school head and took the LDM1

course and consequently submitted the
You only need to submit one (1) LDM practicum portfolio--for LDM1--since
it’s the course that is intended for you--aligned to the professional standards
. pre-implementation module outputs. for school heads, and you have submitted the pre-implementation outputs for
Then, I was assigned to serve as LDM 2 it. LDM2-related artifacts may also be added in your LDM1 practicum
School LAC Leader/ LDM2 portfolio under self-selected artifacts. You just have to map the PPSSH
Instructional Coach. Do I submit two indicators that these LDM2 artifacts cover.
practicum portfolios--for LDM1 and
LDM2?
12 xx xx
13 xx xx
.
AMELIE A. IHALAS
MT-III/MPCES

SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDE in Building Your LDM Practicum Portfolio: Learning Delivery Modalities Course For Teachers

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDE in Building Your LDM Practicum Portfolio: Learning Delivery Modalities Course For Teachers

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LDM 2

Learning Delivery Modalities Course for Teachers

AMELIE A. IHALAS, MT-III

LDM ARTIFACT (MOV) Lesson Plan

Certificates of participation in any

● kumustahan/consultation sessions with

● LDM-related LAC chats

● parents dropping off modules at

NOTE: Blur names and photos of students, parents/guardians

AMELIE A. IHALAS, MT-III Learning Delivery Modalities

LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

LDM Practicum Portfolio Contents

LDM PORTFOLIO ELEMENTS

LDM PORTFOLIO ELEMENTS

name of the artifact

LDM PORTFOLIO ELEMENTS

DELETE this page

How do we rate the

LDM FORM 3.2P

Quality of Reflection (25%)

Language and Overall

Organization of Portfolio (5%)

Demonstration of Progress of LDM Implementation (30%)

Quality of Reflection (25%)

Demonstration of Professional Standards (20%)

Satisfactory The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 indicators of relevant

Marginal The outputs clearly demonstrate the 2 indicators of relevant

Unsatisfactory The outputs do not demonstrate any indicator in the

Language and Overall Presentation of Output (15%)

Organization of Portfolio (5%)

Satisfactory The output/s is/are submitted on the deadline

1. Can I use my LDM certificate for my

2. Can I use my pre-implementation

3. I haven’t received my LDM certificate of

5. Is it okay not to have self-selected

6. I am not a supervisor but I served as

7. Should I include the study notebook in

8. What would be the set of practicum

9. Can the artifacts submitted for the pre-

10 Is the evaluation rubric for teachers

11 I am a school head and took the LDM1

You might also like