Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Publisher
..
Institut for Construction Banja Luka
,
Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Banja Luka
:
For the publisher:
, ..
General director Vojislav Teanovi, ECTS dipl.oec
:
Editor
. , ...
Prof. dr Mirko Ai , PhD, Dipl. Civ. Eng.
, ..
, . . .
Branka Gatari, ECTS dipl.oec
Vesna Gaji, engineer of business org. and managenent
Technical editors
:
Reparation for printing
. . .
Snjeana Lepir, BScEE
:
Printed by
Point,
Point, Laktai
:
Printed
CD ROM
300
300 copies
300 copies
, maj 2015.
Banja Luka, May 2015.
XI
11th INTERNATIONAL
SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL CONFERENCE
CONTEMPORARY
THEORY AND PRACTICE
IN BUILDING DEVELOPMENT
O:
- ,
- ,
-
-
,
- ..
ORGANIZERS:
- MINISTRY OF SPATIAL PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ECOLOGY OF
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA
- FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, BANJA LUKA
- CHAMBRE OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA
- THE PUBLIC INSTITUTION INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION
TESTING OF REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA
- INSTITUT FOR CONSTRUCTION BANJA LUKA
:
-
- , ,
SPONSORS:
- GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA
- CITY OF BANJA LUKA, REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
-
EDIA SPONSOR:
- RADIO-TELEVISION OF REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA
CONTENTS
FOREWORD
MILENKO PRULJ
BRIDGE AESTHETICS ..................................................................................
,
MIRJANA LUKI
SOLAR SKY SCAPERS CONSTRUCTIONS OF ARCHITECT NORMAN
FOSTER ...........................................................................................................
13
- : ,
MIRKO AI
DRAGICA JEVTI
DIMITRIJE ZAKI
EXPOSED CONCRETE: PROPERTIES, APPLICATION AND
TECHNICAL REGULATION .
21
DOBROSLAV ABRILO
MARKO IVEC
MILENKO PRUL
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MONITORING OF A VIADUCT ON
AN UNSTABLE SLOPE .
31
-
, ,
-
,
MILA PUCAR
MARINA NENKOVI-RIZNI
EXPERIENCES IN IMPLEMENTING SRP SPATIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL,
ENERGY AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF DEVELOPING SETTLEMENTS AND
CLIMATE CHANGE MUTUAL IMPACTS COOPERATION, PROBLEMS
AND OBTAINED RESULTS ... 43
DEJAN LUBISAVLEVI
MILAN JOKSIMOVI
STATIC CALCULATION OF SEWER PIPES ...
53
eet eaje oee o oejaa a
o ae
SVETLANA STEVOVI
MORE EFFICIENT ENERGY UTILIZATION OF HYDRO POTENTIAL
ON THE MRATINJE PROFILE ...................................................................... 63
.
.
.
oj 27.10. 1969.
MIODRAG I. MANI
BORKO . BULAJI
MIHAILO D. TRIFUNAC
ON PEAK ACCELERATIONS COMPUTED FROM SLIDING OF
OBJECTS DURING THE OCTOBER 27, 1969 BANJA LUKA
EARTHQUAKE ...
71
ZORAN KNEEVI
VLADISLAVA BARTO DIVAC
ZVONIMIR KOCI
FLOOD PROTECTION OF CITY PARACIN
83
NIKOLA GVOZDOVI
LUBO MARKOVI
LILANA MILI MARKOVI
VELIMIR DUTINA
EFFECT OF THE "SMART HOUSE" CONCEPT ON LIFE QUALITY
AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY ........................................................................ 91
2014.
STEVAN PROHASKA
DRAGAN UKI
VLADISLAVA BARTO DIVAC
NEDELKO TODOROVI
ASSESSMENT OF THE RETURN PERIOD OF THE RAINFALL THAT
CAUSED THE DISASTROUS MAY 2014 FLOOD IN SERBIA ..................
101
MILOVAN JOTI
VLADETA VUJANI
THE EXTENT OF DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CYCLONE
TAMARA ON STATE ROADS IN SERBIA .. 113
j ''
''
DUKO SUNARI
MILAN MALEEV
BORIS KRUNI
ANALYSIS OF THE CONDITIONS FOR THE REHABILITATION OF
THE ROAD NEAR OF THE MINE "VELIKI MAIDAN" LJUBOVIJA
123
VLADETA VUJANI
SLOBODAN NEDELJKOVI
MILOVAN JOTI
TERRAIN VULNERABILITY AND ACCEPTABLE RISK IN CREATED
AREA SOME ASPECTS .. 135
ZLATKO MARKOVI
INTRODUCING OF EUROCODES IN STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL
REGULATION OF SERBIA AN OVERVIEW OF CURRENT STATE
-
143
RADOVAN VUKOMANOVI
APPLICATION OF ANCHORED RC GRILLAGE STRUCTURES FOR
LANDSLIDES REHABILITATION ...............................................................
151
DRAGAN LUKI
MARTINA VOJNI
ALEKSANDAR PROKI
MIROSLAV BEEVI
MODERN FASTENING OF THE RAIL TO THE SLEEPER
FOR RECONDITIONING OF RAILWAYS ...
161
MATO ULJAREVI
BOJANA GRUJI
DAJANA ULJAREVI
EFFECT OF DETERMINING SOIL PARAMETERS TO HE DEL
CALCULATION RESULTS ...........................................................................
171
AEO O
oae oje oa eeeaa
o e oja II
ANELKO CUMBO
FORMING OF THE LAYERED FINITE ELEMENT FOR ANALYSING
THE INFLUENCE OF RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ON COMPLEX
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES .
179
VEDRAN CAREVI
JANKO RADOVANOVI
REACTIVE POWDER CONCRETE ..
187
K
SLAANA JANKOVI
CONTRADICTIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE IN
RESIDENTAL ARCHITECTURE ..................................................................
195
SVETOMIR PROKI
NEBOJA POPOVI
THE KOLUBARA RIVER DISPLACEMENT IN THE LIGNITE BASIN ...
207
( , )
MILE BOI
DEJAN MILOEV
MILORAD STOJADINOVI
PUBLIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH LARGER NUMBER OF USERS
(GROCKA MUNICIPALITY, CITY OF BELGRADE) .................................
225
VELKO UKI
POSSIBILITIES OF APPLICATION BIOREACTOR DISPOSAL IN
MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ..
233
JOVANA UKANOVI
SANJA JANKOVI
TEODORA VUKI
SAA OREVI
GREEN WALLS IN URBAN CITY AREAS AND THEIR INFLUENCE
ON MICROCLIMATE ....................................................................................
241
VLADETA VUJANI
ROAD CONSTRUCTION ON LABILE AND
UNSTABLE TERRAINS .
249
,
-
VLADETA VUJANI
SIMO TOOVI
TECHNOLOGY OF CONSTRUCTION OF CUT, DAP AND BUILDING
MISTAKES IN COMPLEX GEOLOGICAL GEOTECHNICL
CONDITIONS ..
263
ALEKSANDAR PROKI
MARTINA VOJNI
DRAGAN LUKI
MIROSLAV BEEVI
MODUL REACTION OF SOIL IN THE CALCULATION OF
STRUCTURES ................................................................................................. 273
DRAGAN LUKI
ELEFTERIJA ZLATANOVI
ALEKSANDAR PROKI
MARTINA VOJNI
LOAD TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION INFLUENCED PROCESS
RHEOLOGICAL IN THE ROCK MASS
281
MILAN TRIFKOVI
TIHOMIR MILUTINOVI
ARKO NESTOROVI
GORAN PEJII
ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL GEODETIC NETWORKS FOR
DEFORMATION ANALYS OF ENGINEERING OBJECTS
, ,
291
HAMDO MEI
ANESA LJEVO
RAID HADI
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROJECTOR, CONTRACTOR,
SUPERVISOR IN IMPLEMENTATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF
INVESTMENT BUILDING ............................................................................
299
ASSET MENAGEMENT-
GORDANA GLOGOVAC
MIODRAG BABI
MILANA KOI
ASSET MENAGEMENT IN WATER UTILITIES ........................................
307
M
MIROSLAV MALINOVI
CONTRIBUTION TO DISCUSSION ON RECENT ARCHITECTURE IN
OFM BOSNA ARGENTINA ........................................................................... 315
BRANKA TOMI
GEOSPATIAL SENSOR NETWORKS IN PREVENTION OF HAZARDS
OF LANDSLIDES IN MUNICIPALITY GRADIKA ... 323
MILICA IGI
PETAR MITKOVI
IVANA BOGDANOVI PROTI
REGENERATION OF FORMER INDUSTRIAL COMPLEXES INTO THE
PARKS .
331
RISTO STJEPANOVI
THE REGULATION OF TORRENTIAL STREAMS
339
CVJETKO SANDI
DRAGAN MITROVI
KOVILKA LEKA
NECESSITY FOR MAKING THE LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP
IN THE EASTERN PART OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA .
349
IVANA KLARI
NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB
SUPPORTED BY COLUMNS 357
ARKO LAZI
ZORAN KONESKI
JOVICA STANOJEVI
ACCIDENTAL TORSION IN SYMMETRICAL STRUCTURES ................
365
EJAA MO
AA
ee ao eja ea, ae oo aoja a
oo eoa - ee aaa oa
DEJANA MILINKOVI
BILANA ILI
CEMENT AS CHEMICAL MIXTURES, CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS
AND COMPONENT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CONCRETE REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF REGULATION IN THE RS ...
375
MAR
MILAN JAKI
DEJAN LJUBISAVLJEVI
MATO ULJAREVI
STATIC AND DYNAMIC PROBLEMS CAUSED BY GROUNDWATER
PUMPING IN MAR SYSTEMS
385
CHS -N
MILIVOJE MILANOVI
MERI CVETKOVSKA
RADENKO PEJOVI
NAZIM MANI
SIZE EFFECT CROSS SECTION CHS COMPOSITE COLUMN ON HIS M N CAPACITY IN TERMS OF FIRE ..
K
391
RADOMIR ZEJAK
NATAA KOPITOVI VUKOVI
BEHAVIOR OF RC BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH COMPOSITE
MATERIALS - EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS ............................................
401
MILICA JOVANOVI POPOVI
SAJA KOSANOVI
BOJANA STANKOVI
METHODOLOGY FOR QUALITY ESTIMATION OF MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN SERBIA
409
MILICA JOVANOVI POPOVI
DUAN IGNJATOVI
BOJANA STANKOVI
APPLICATION RANGE OF NATIONAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
TYPOLOGY ON LOCAL LEVEL ..
417
p a eoma ao poappao pao
eoa
JAKOB UTERI
ANDREJ ZAJC
EVALUATION OF BEHAVIOUR OF VERY YOUNG FIBRE
REINFORCED SHOTCRETE .
429
-
SRA ALEKSI
MILIVOJE ROGA
RADOVAN UROVI
TEST LOADING OF STEEL EAVES ACC PODGORICA .
439
MARIJA BODROA
OMISSIONS IN CONDUCTING REGULATIONS OF THE GUIDELINES
FOR
PLANNING
AND
DESIGNING
CONDITIONS
FOR
UNDISTURBED MOVEMENTS OF CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH
DECREASED PHYSICAL ABILITIES .......................................................... 445
ISIDORA KARAN
MILANA STIJAK
APPLICATION OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE PLANNING
PROCESS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA
455
BRANKO MAZI
ALEKSANDRA MANDI
INFLUENCE OF MICRO-LOCATION ON EXTREME DEPTH OF
FROST PENETRATION INTO SOIL . 467
,
PETAR BEGOVI
BRANKO IVANKOVI
GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF URBAN AREA OF SRBAC ..................
475
,
,
I
MILORAD LOLIN,
DRAGUTIN JEVREMOVI,
DUKO SUNARI
VELJKO MALETI
KATARINA ANDREJEV
LANDSLIDE NEAR ''THE KING ALEXANDER I KARADJO-RDJEVIC''
BRIDGE IN MALI ZVORNIK
483
- :
VLADAN VRANE
MILAN PETROVI
RAINFORCE CONCRETE COLUMN OF HIGH RISE BUILDINGS:
INTERNATIONAL VS. LOCAL DESIGN PRACTICE
493
3
NIKOLINA MIJI
MILORAD JANI
CALCULATED QUANTITIES BASED ON 3D MODEL OF CHANNEL ..
503
ANESA LJEVO
RAID HADI
NERMAN RUSTEMPAI
PROJECT MANAGEMENT, QUALITY AND SUCCESS FACTORS IN
CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES ...................................................................
511
SIMO TOOVI
AKI LASLO
SELECTION OF FAILURE CRITERIA FOR DEFINING THE
PARAMETERS OF SHEAR STRENGTH .........
519
SQUAT
DRAGANA DABI
VLADAN VRANE
RAIL DEFECT FROM SQUAT TYPE ON RAILWAY STATION
"PANCEVO VAROS"
527
-
-
DRAGICA JEVTI
TOMISLAV DUBOANIN
ANTIGORIT INFLUENCE TO THE PHYSICAL-MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES OF CEMENT LIME MORTARS 537
.
2 - -
MILENKO STANKOVI
RADUKA CUPA
SAA B. VORO
NEVENA NOVAKOVI
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND REDUCE EMISSIONS OF CO2 NEW
BUILDING FACEG IN BANJA LUKA .
549
BROWNINFO : K
TIJANA VUJII
ALEKSANDRA UKI
DIJANA SIMONOVI
BROWNINFO METHODOLOGY AND SOFTWARE KEY FOR
ACTIVATION OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS.
557
(60) -
XI -
" ".
, .
,
, ,
,
.
, , (,
, .), , ,
, , ,
. ,
, ,
.
,
,
2014. .
,
, , ,
.
, ,
, .
,
.
,
, ,
.
, ,
( 50%), ( 1/3 ) ;
, , ,...
, ,
,
.
, , ,
.
, , , ,
, , .
,
2015.
:
. , ...
ESTETIKA MOSTOVA
:
(
), , ,
.
.
: , , , ,
BRIDGE AESTHETICS
Summary:
A bridge as utilizable and symbolic structure shall be reliable (safe and stable),
functional, economical, aesthetically correctly designed and incorporated into
natural or urban space.
The article provides fundamental principles of bridge aesthetics, illustrated by
examples of beautiful as well as less successful solutions.
Keywords: bridge, aesthetics, functionality, reliability, rationality
. . ,
,
. , ,
.
,
, , , ,
, , ,
.
(
) ,
, , ,
.
.
.
, , ,
.
.
, .
. .
.
.
, .
, .
. ,
. ,
.
, ,
,
.
,
.
2
,
,
,
,
, ,
.
1 ,
,
.
1:
2
,
.
.
2:
3
. ,
.
3:
, .
( 4).
.
4:
.
, (
, ) ( 5).
5:
.
.
6 .
6:
7.
7:
5
,
,
.
, .
( 8).
8:
45 + 60 + 45 m.
.
, ( 9).
9: 1971.
,
.
( 10).
10:
.
( 11).
11:
12 .
,
, ,
.
-
.
12:
,
,
, 12
13. .
.
13:
.
, .
. 14
.
14:
2005.
.
.
,
. 60 ,
( 15).
,
. ( 15)
1808. .
15:
(16).
.
.
16:
70 cm
, .
17:
,
.
,
, ;
. (P. Sijourni).
.
10
.
. ,
.
.
. 1981. .
. . .
.
11
,
:
,
, ,
, .
. ,
, , ,
. ,
, ,
.
; , , ,
13
.
2014 :
-
.
, , 299 m,
,
, 40.000 m2.
, .
47
4 , 179 m, 3200 .
5000 m2, , 52 m.
, ,
75 .
, , 46 , 182 .
, 1928 , ,
.
, ,
. ,
, ,
. ,
, .
, , ,
. ,
. 180 m
14
:
1.
1.
..
,
The highest commercial building in Europe, The Commercial Bank in Frankfurt
, , 299 m,
,
, 40.000 m2.
15
,
a 2300 .
.
,
.
,
,
.
2.
2.The building of Honking Bank corporation in the city
47
4 , 179 m, 3200 .
5000 m2, , 52 m.
, ,
75 m. , 21
16
24 ,
, .
- , ,
,
"-" ( " ).
.3. Herst
3. The Hearst Corporation building in NewYork
17
, ,
,
, .
46 , 182 .
, ( . ), 1928 ,
, 57 .
,
, , ,
.
P
. 11 2001,
,
, ,
.
, ,
. ,
, ,
.
,
20 % . ,
, , 4 .
10.480 .
2.000 . 80.000 m2.
.
,
.
, ,
, ,
, ,
, .
, ,
. , ,
, 21 .
, , ,
. Emporis Skajskejper
2006 , ,
, .
18
,
.
.
.4.
4.The London scayscaper Cucomber
,
400m. 180 m.
19
.
,
; ,
, Svis Re, 2000 ,
, Svis Re.
.
, ,
, ,
,
.
.
,
.
. ,
.
,
, .
( ).
,
. ,
.
, .
, .
INTERNET PORTALI:
Lord Norman Foster
NewYork Green building
London Cucomber
20
1, 2, 3
- : ,
:
() .
,
() . ,
.
.
. ,
.
: () , , , ,
.
. ,
. ,
3
. ,
2
21
1
. , 25
, 3,8 .
, .
, , , ,
. ,
,
,
(, ,
), (, , ),
, .
, .
, , (,
, ), , ,
, . ,
,
, . .
(eng: Exposed concrete, nem: Sichtbeton). DIN 18217:
Betonoberflchen und Schalhaut [1], ()
()
( , , , ,
, , , .). DBV/BDZMerkblatt Sichtbeton [2], ,
, SB1 ( ) SB4 (
).
, , () ,
( ),
. ,
,
, [4]. ,
(, , , ,
), ( ,
, , ),
( SCC , FRC , ,
HPC, , .).
() ,
. ,
,
. (.
), , ,
22
, ,
.
()
,
[3]. :
- (, , ),
- ( ,
, , ),
- ( , v/c 0,02
),
- (
,
- bleeding),
- (
),
- ,
-
,
- ( ),
- ,
- -,
- ( -
),
- ,
,
- ,
- (in situ, , , SCC ),
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
(
),
,
( 2, -87),
( , , , , ,
, ),
(, ,
, , , ),
.
23
2
() ,
, . ,
, , , , ,
, XX , . ,
, ,
.
, , , .
, , /
,
.
,
- ,
- ,
[5]. ,
,
( ).
,
. 50- 60- XX ,
. ,
,
.
.
, ,
, , .
1960-1970.
,
.
,
, . "
". ,
- ( ),
( )
- , . [6]. :
,
,
, ,
- ,
,
.
24
XX " ".
. " " [5].
, ,
. , ,
.
,
"" (
), , .
61 62 ( , 1970-).
,
. - "" ( 1970.
) ""
"", ( 1 ). ,
- ,
.
,
. ,
- ,
.
,
() ,
(
, 1954. ).
, (
, , 1965. ).
:
,
. 1999.
, 2006-2009.
,
( 1 - ).
(
, 2011. ), 200
,
( 2).
,
, .
25
1. - "" () ()
2.
26
3
, 60- 70-
,
. .
, ,
. , ,
,
,
. , ,
[6].
, ""
( ),
, .
"" , ""
. ,
, ,
, "" - ""
. , ,
,
() .
,
"" , , , ,
, , . ,
( ,
). , ,
.
( 1960- 1970-),
,
. ,
, ,
" ".
[6]:
,
"" ,
,
"" ,
( ).
"" , ,
() ,
-
27
( ,
). , "" ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
.
,
,
.
,
(,
, , , .).
/
. ,
, ,
. :
? , [2]
, ,
1.
1 - () DBV/BDZ
SB1
SB2
SB3
SB4
( )
,
,
,
. :
-, , , ,
- () .
DIN 18217 (Betonoberflchen und Schalhaut)
DBV/BDZ-Merkblatt (Sichtbeton), ()
: NORM B2211 (''Beton- und
Stahlbetonarbeiten), OVBB-Richtlinie ''Geschallte Betonflaechen (Sichtbeton)'', DIN 18202
(''Toleranzen im Hochbau''), EN 13670 (''Execution of concrete structures'') TP CEN/TR
15739 (''Precast concrete products'').
28
4
,
()
. ,
(SB1 SB4),
- , , , ,
- () . ,
,
, , .
,
, .
,
,
.
, .
, ,
- ,
- .
(
),
""
,
. , "" ,
.
""
, SCC , FRC , HPC
.
() , ,
( ) . ,
,
.
,
36017
: "
, ,
".
29
[3]
[4]
. , . : " 2",
, 2003.
[5]
"", : http://pulse.rs/stilovi-i-pokreti-usrpskoj-arhitekturi-krajem-xx-pocetkom-xxi-veka.
[6]
. , . :
, ,
,
, , , . 1-16, 2013.
[7]
: " -
",
, 2013.
[8]
'87
, , , 1989.
[9]
. , . , . , . : "
", , 1-2/2002, . 11-19.
[10] Jevti D., Zaki D.: Exposed concrete application once and nowadays, 21. Slovenski
kolokvij o betonih "Vidni beton", Zbornik gradiv in referatov, Ljubljana, Slovenija, 21.
5. 2014, pp. 37-48, ISBN 978-961-93671-0-0.
[11] Korla J.: Measuring quality of visible concrete, 21. Slovenski kolokvij o betonih "Vidni
beton", Zbornik gradiv in referatov, Ljubljana, Slovenija, 21. 5. 2014, pp. 63-69, ISBN
978-961-93671-0-0.
[12] Horvath J.: Construction technology and formed surfaces with visible concrete, 21.
Slovenski kolokvij o betonih "Vidni beton", Zbornik gradiv in referatov, Ljubljana,
Slovenija, 21. 5. 2014, pp. 5-7, ISBN 978-961-93671-0-0.
30
1, 2, 3
,
:
H4 - , -.
-
.
, ,
333,02 m, 332,53 m.
, 26m.
10
.
: , , ,
31
1.
"" -.
.
"".
/
/ ,
- 2001 .
/ 2003 ,
-
2005 .
2003 2005 ,
,
.
2.
.
5%, 3,5 % -2,5% ( ).
21,08 m
6 L=332,53 m, L=333,07 m .
( 1 2)
1:
32
dilatacija D240
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
7L
6L
313
izl.
312
izl.
311
izl.
310
izl.
309
4L
3L
5L
izl.
308
307
306
305
304
2L
303
302
301
1L
300
299
298
297
296
295
294
0L
KOZINA
8L
9L
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
k izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
odvodnjavanje, O 200
izl.
izl.
odvodnjavanje, O 200
5.8+87.50
dilatacija D240
313
7D
6D
312
311
310
5D
309
308
4D
307
306
305
3D
304
303
2D
302
1D
301
300
299
298
297
296
295
8D
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
6.2+30.50
1D
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
izl.
dilatacija D240
294
0D
0L
KOZINA
izl.
izl. k
k izl.
izl.
izl.
VIPAVA
2:
. 3,20 m
, 4,10 m, 40 cm.
6,6 m 4,2 5,0 m.
7 ( 3)
3:
33
3.
4 5 6.
-
2001 ,
. 4, 5 6
2001-2003.
3.1
2001
-
. DN 638050 ... 2001 .
.
. 0,1,2 3 , 1,5 mPa, 4,5 6
1,35 2,8 mPa.
.
3.1.1
0D 0L
5,5 m
6,5 m. 5,40 m, 9,5 m.
C25/30. ( 4 5).
4: 0D
5: 0L
34
3.1.2
1L 1D (2L,2D,3L,3D)
5,5 m
8,0 m. 8,0 9,0 m. ,
. ( 6 7)
6: 1D
3.1.3
7: 1L
2L,2D 3L,3D
5,5 m
8,0 m, 7,5 m 2L 2D 9,5 10,0 m
3L 3D. . ( 8 9)
8: 2L,2D
9: 3L,3D
35
3.2
2003
. 6 5
.
4,5 6. , ,
. -
4 5 6
.
.. , 2003 .
.
PO
LI8
Q
pg
5 6
6,
26,0 m.
l
Q
de
29
PO
PO
L-
5 , -I 2
38 A
IP
1
PO
L-
I3
A'
10: 4,5 6
6
19 26 m, 4
36
18m 2001 .
4 , 11,0 m.
5 6, 4, 10-15 mm
.
4
5 6. ,
.
15 mm , 135 .
3.2.1
5 6
5 6
- .
7,4 m 3,0x3,0 m,
/ 200 cm ,
130 .
11:
37
8,0 m
( 11) .
5L,5D, 6L 6D
. 8,0 8,40 m,
, ,
, .
38
12: 5L,5D,6L 6D
3.2.2
. 4
4.
-16
11,0 m.
.
. ,
. ( 13)
39
POL-I7(IPO-4) (+3,5m)
311,55
(AVTOMATSKI INKLINOMETER SE OBVEZNO OHRANI )
POL-I6 (+3,5m)
306,715
(INKLINOMETER, BREZ
JEDROVANJA)
Qpg
GC
9,0
GP/GC
EN
TER
JEN
EN
OC
Qpg
GC
GC/GM
(zaglinjen do meljast gru apn.)
12,0
9.6
11.7
14.7
GC/GP
17,0
18,0
20,5
GC/GP
(E1,2)
17.4
fli, rjav in sivorjav, preperel
lapor, siv
19.3
26.0
fli, siv in sivorjav,
lokalno preperel
(E1,2)
1,2
22.7
24.7
E1,2
28.0
13:
,
6
5x0,62" .
40
4.
30.10.2013. .
, .
,
2x
.
5.
41
1, -2
, ,
- ,
:
- , ,
-
,
2011. 2015. . 50 6 -
.
(). ,
,
.
: , , .
, , , e-mail: mp@iaus.ac.rs
, , , e-mail: marina@iaus.ac.rs
43
1
- ,
- ,
().
,
,
, [1].
20112015.
, , ,
.
: , ,
36035. :
,
, ,
. 46 53 . ,
,
.
, ,
.
,
, ,
, ,
, .
.
.
. ,
.
.
.
. ,
, ,
.
.
,
.
,
44
,
, .
,
, ,
.
50% .
,
(). 2015.
, ,
.
3D
( cityGML-a ao OGC ,
); ;
.
2
2010. ,
.
, , :
; ; ;
;
,
;
;
, (,
); ,
( , /, ).
978 : (),
() (), 777 79,45%.
,
( ,
). : ,
, 2010. 373, 273 73,19%.
2.1
,
:
- , ;
- ;
45
- C2 ;
- , C2
;
- ;
- , , ,
.
2.2
.
.
,
. ,
, .
,
C2 .
,
, ,
.
,
, .
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
3D
,
. 3D
,
C2.
46
2.3
, , CO2,
.
, , .,
.
.
.
.
,
.
, ,
CO2.
, .
,
.
3. 2011.
2014.
: 1-
, ; 2-
; 3- ,
; 4-
; 5- ,
,
.
.
3.1 ,
,
, ,
. ,
, .
, ,
.
,
, .
.
(on-line) .
47
,
.
, , (
) , ,
. ,
.
,
, ,
, , , .
.
. , (,
, ),
.
3.1.1
,
,
.
.
.
.
, .
, [2].
, , 36035,
.
,
: http://e-science.amres.ac.rs/TP36035/.
, Wordpress
W .
, ,
.
(3D
, , ,
.),
,
.
48
Web ,
, ,
.
,
,
, .
.
, , , ,
;
[3].
3.2 ,
. ,
,
,
[4]. ,
.
( , ,
).
(),
,
.
.
.
, , .
.
.
3.3
, ,
.
.
.
,
,
.
, .
. , -
49
4.
.
2011. 2014. 700. 40
, 26 .
13 220
. 12 45
. 12 .
( 30, , , , ).
, ( ,
).
5.
.
,
.
(). ,
,
.
( ,
).
, HORIZONT 2020.
.
, 2010,
http://147.91.185.80/predlog_sajta/images/stories/pravna_akta/strategija/strategija_prelo
m.pdf , (, 2012.)
Planung und Projekte im Hinblick auf den Klimawandel Situation in Serbien, . Pucar, .
Devetakovic, Klimawandel als Gesellschaftliche Herausforderung - Antworten aus der
Perspektive von Jura und Architektur, Goethe-Institut, 2011, Beograd, Sarajevo.
,
, . , 38, 14.
2008.
36035 ,
,
, ,
.
51
1, 2
:
, ATV-DVWK-A 127.
: a, ,
.
, ,
DN 500 .
.
: ,,,a,
1
2
. . , - ,, ljubisav@grf.bg.ac.rs,
. . , milanjoksimovic@yahoo.com,
53
1
. ,
.
1- a
: ATV-DVWKA 127, . O
, , .
- HDPE
UP-GF
. SN 5000.
DN 500, ,
s=85mm ; s=75mm . ; s=21,6 mm
s=10mm .
h=0,5
h=5
m
0,5
m
(hw=2
m
)
. ,
b=1,55 m ( 2)
( 2 2). 2= 90
2= 120 . I (
). G3
(G1).
2, 2 , , 2,0=6
N/mm2 a
, . 1
[1] . .
.
3-6 . h
, , 5 6, a 7
. v h .
54
2 -
1 [1]
M
ER
ER,K
ER,L
N/mm2
N/mm2
KN/m3
R,K
R,L
N/mm2
N/mm2
30 000
24
6,4
30 000
25
(HDPE)
(UP-GF)
800
160
9,4
21
14
8436
5416
17,5
. . . qv=RGpE+pV ,
-pE
o - pV
RG :
. , ,
.
, . ,
,
KN/m3 .
,
, ,
SLW 60.
o -pa
-Rs -W
55
3
,
,
m n
:
2
,rm ,q
qv, qh,
,
, Rs Wrm .
:
: = s x 1mm, W ,
.
,
() :
3 - . ,
=2,2
,
56
4 -
5- HDPE
6 - UP-GF
57
4
.
.
. .
,
, . .
dv,
:
,
, :
6%. 6 %
( )
5x .
. .
7- ,
6%
5
. ,
, doz ,
.
58
5.1
qV
:
, v2 -
1%; S0 je SBh. ;
-
5.2
.
.
:
, D . pa
, . W=10
KN/m3 hW=2 m:
pa:
5.3
.
:
59
8- () ()
6 AK
( , ,
, ...). .
,
. : ,
.
.
, 0,5-5
,
.
, ,
,
.
2 3,5-5
8 .
.
.
.
60
ATV-DVWK-A 127
3. ,
, 2013, , . 11-52.
61
, , ,
63
1. O
Ao e o aeao ae aaa eeea eao,
oe oeeeo oejaa a jeo o, oa e eo
oe e a e oeae eeee eao a E a aa oea
aae ae oe oe oejaa, ee ooe
aeje e e eeje. oo eea ao je ea jea o
e aja oeaa aae ae a o e ae Mae,
ao oe oee ae ae eo o.
o eao eea oea ea - a, a oe oea
eaaje e ae eoje oeaje oeeae a,
oeo je aaa ojee oo oeaa aae ae a
o eaae E Mae, aa E a. ooj e e oo
a oeae eea aao oe oeeae eee eaje
oee oejaa a o. eee oje aje aje a je
ajaa a oo oeo ao ao eo o oo je aao
oo eea. eo oeaa o a o Mae je aaa o
oa o e e oaaj oo a aje ee e, oa oa
ooe eeje, a a oae ea joo oooa, o
aea aaea oe ee [1].
2. TAJ
MAT
MEOAE OJEATA
OMEA
. 50 ,
, .
,
,
. ,
, ,
, redefinisati, optimizirati
, , .
, ,
.
, ,
.
,
.
[2].
oe eea aao oea ooejaa a o ae
oeeae a, oaa e a ooj eae ao aao
ojea oeae eeee eao oejo oe
oo oa eeje j oo aoja a eja eea
aaaa Eeooje-oee Ee, jo o ae 1980.oe. O
eo ee aae ae a oo eoo ooje, aao e a a
ee ojeoaa ojea E a I. aa je o e o, e
64
3. OO OET AE E A II
Oo oe oeaa aae ae E a, eo ao,
eo a, aa e a ej ae oe oee ae ae
oeeae eo o, a ooo oj e eo ee ae. oojea
aa a aa e ojaa o ae oj 13, a e e je oa oo 15
eea 22 , a ooo ea oo 9 . a ee ojaa ae, jeeo
oao eo a o 560 , ao e oaa eea a eo
ooaajo ao ao, oja ooa a e o aaj ooo
oe, a E a I aa oj a, a a e ae ao a ae oja
ooa aae. Oaa ooaj ooa oa je ooaja eea eo oa
o e e ee e. Oa je eoo aa aa oea a
oeo o ao aoja a aoe o 47 . ojee e a
oeae e aae a a, a e:
- a e a aeo o o o e a e a oe,
ooo aeo o oe, aa ea eaoea aoa.
aa aa ooe ae ae jo je o oe:
- oeo aeo aee o eea ae, ooo o o ja
oaaa o eea,
- a aeo o ooje oaja oaja,
- ejo a oo oo e ea a a oa ooe oe
e o ao oojee oaa 20-a oo o "eo oa",
- ooa ooo eea aa.
o ae ae e ae a e, a e oo a a
aj oaa, aeaa. e o aaea, a
oeeo e a eaj. oea aa e ooao
ao oa ae ee ae, aj oe aoa.
ea e oa o ao oje e o oe oa,
oje eo o aeje. Oo je jea o aoa o oa o
oojea ee oo 1.
ae oe oaaa eeaoa oo oo, eaa ojeoae
ee aaje E jea, e je aeo je je oaea oa oa
jee oja aa a eoj . o oeo ao oojaa ooaa o
ae ae (14,5 ), o eo o aea oja
a e.
4. TEO EEE
oeeaa a II je ee oeje aaoo ao oojee,
oje ojo oao aao ao o 342 MW oo o aa
oeja e oe ee e, aoa aaoo jee oe
aee 790 hm3. aae aaje je eo a oo oo
oe aaa oa. a aaje oojee E a je Qinst=3x803/,
e je Qinst/Qsr=3.2, o, ao e oaaj ajeo oojea oeeaa a I a
ooeoeo HE Piva II, e je Qinst=3x80+2x120=4803/, oja e a je
65
66
67
68
6. AA AMATAA
oao je, a e eea eeja oe oe ao oa, ooo oaa,
ao oeeo aoa eee, a o ao e oeje, ooo
a e oe o ao oe ooe. ae, o eee e jeo
eeo-eeeo ea aea e a ao ea o aa o oe a e
aooea jeao: ooa = ooa + eoa, a a je
e aje, oja e o ojoj eoooj ao, aaoj oj,
oaea e a e a ee o oea ea a ja aa
a o oeeaa oa oeeeo oejaa.
Oo a oo ao oa, eaoa e, a o a
o ao oa aaeaa a eoo ooo oa a oo
oo eee eeje, jae oaj eoe o oo aaa.
oe oaj jo e aa e aa o a aooea ooo
eea o eoo eeja. o, o ao ea a oo ae a aaj
oe aoeeo eaeo aaa
oeeeo oejaa, eo a oa oa oa.
69
AAOT
, je 35030
18031.
TEATA
1. eo eaa, Eoo eae oeee, aa
Aeje, eoa, 2006.
2. Stevovi S., Stamatovi M, Ivanovi G., Methodological approach and artificial
intelligency application as solution for environmental conflict related to large dams, Dams
and Reservoirs under Changing Challenges ICOLD 2011, 785-791, Publisher:
Taylor&Francis
3. Hranislav Milosevic, Namik Ahmetovich Geydarov, Yuriy Nikolaevich Zakharov, Svetlana
Stevovic, Full Length Research Paper: Model of incompressible viscous fluid flow driven
by pressure difference in a given channel, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
4. Hranislav Miloevi, Svetlana Stevovic, Dojin Petkovi, Full Length Research Paper:
Numerical simulation of interaction during the top blow in a steel making converter,
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
5. Stevovic Svetlana, Milosevic Hranislav, Stevovic Ivan, Sabahudin Hadrovic, Sustainable
management of water resources in Prokletije region, Industry, vol. 42, no. 1, 2014., pp 4761
6. Stevovi Svetlana, Milovanovi Zorica, Milaji Aleksandar, New methodological approach
in techno - economic and environmenral optimisation of sustainable energy production,
Thermal Science, Year 2010, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 809-819
7. Neboja Zaki, Milan Stamatovi, Svetlana Stevovi, Necessity of entrepreneurship
education: A research among entrepreneurs and potential entrepreneurs in Serbia, African
Journal of Business Management Vol. 6 (9), pp. 3173-3180, 7 March, 2012.
8. Hranislav Miloevi, Dragana Vasilski, Svetlana Stevovi, Sustainable technology for
existing buildings renovation in the function of energy efficiency, Technics Technologies
Education Management Journal, ISSN: 1840-1503, vol 8 no 1, 2013.
70
. 1, . 2, . 3
OJ 27.10. 1969.
:
27.10.1969.,
.
Mercalli CancaniSieberg (MCS) .
1973. 1986.
e .
: ,
,
, , , ,
3
, , , (USC),
2
71
1
1969. ,
1971. . ,
,
,
[1-4], - ,
- .
,
[5].
[6],
. ,
. [7]
.
1973. 1986. ,
[6].
, .
,
. Milne-
[8-9] Perry- [10],
[11-15].
[16-20] [21-22].
.
27. 1969. , ML = 6.4,
I0 = VIIIIX MCS (. 1) [23]. , 60%
, . 76.000
, . ,
,
[24].
, 1971.
()
, . ,
1969. (ML = 6.4),
.
, ,
72
80cm/s2 I, 140cm/s2 II, 180cm/s2 III.
,
[7].
, 3.0 3.8 .
MCS
,
[28].
2. 218 , 23
.
27.10.1969. .
1973. 1986.
2 1969.
,
ML = 4.5 1968. 1969. ,
1969. , -
26. 1969 (ML = 6.0, I0 = VIIVIII MCS) (27.
1969; ML = 6.4, I0 = VIIIIX MCS).
, IX MCS ~70 km2, VIII MCS
~1800 km2, VII MCS ~9000 km2,
1 [23].
, -
. 1000
74
, 250 23
( . 2). . [7],
.
(, , ,
, ), . 250 , 218
, 21 , 3
, 1 . 7 ,
. 218 250 ,
[kg] [kg] .
.
. [7]
268, 246 297.
. 2, , . 3,
, 90 270, 180. ,
140-320 50-230,
IX MCS . 1.
[23],
27 .
,
NNWSSE 318 SSWNNE 227.
1969.
, ,
1 [29].
1 [29].
3. 250
1969.
75
3
1969.
3.1.
[29],
1
[29]. 218 , ah, 11 14
1 [29] ,
,
(. r = 0.7 r = 0.0, [29]).
4 , ah. ,
ah r = 0.7.
ah 0.337 g 0.086 g, 0.400 g 0.093 g
, .
. , 1.20.
4. , ah, r = 0.7,
27.10. 1969. ,
3.2.
log10(acc) I
[MCS], .
76
[28]. 1969.
IX MCS ( . 1),
218 .
5, ,
,
( ),
. [28]. ,
218 , 2.534 (~ 342cm/s2),
2.531 (~340 cm/s2).
5.
1969. ( B12 B21,
[29], , . r=0.7 r = 0),
.
log10(acc) I [MCS]
[28].
, Lee . [6] ,
(UHS) [30-33].
- [7]
1969. ML = 6.4,
,
Lee . [6]
,
[34]
[35-36].
6
50 ,
Lee- . [6] "" (SL=0)
77
6.
50 Lee - . [6]
"" (SL=0) (SS)
(SL=1) -2 (BK2), -9 (BK9), (IIM)
( '''' 2).
13.08.1981. ML = 5.4 a
(),
1969. ML = 6.4,
i i , r = 0.
13.08.1981. ML = 5.4 e 6,
e .
27.10.1969. ML = 6.4
.
[7] 6
,
r = 0 (
),
. 6,
Lee- . [6] 0.2 50 ,
78
0.1 50 .
500
27.10.1969. .
4
- 1971. [7],
, 80 cm/s2 I, 140 cm/s2
II, 180 cm/s2 III.
1973. 1986.
1971.
ML = 4, 1.2 2.4
,
ML = 5.4 (13. 1981).
218 404 cm/s2 r=0.0,
531 cm/s2 r=0.0. 2.2 3.0
- 1971.
III, 2.9 3.8
II.
, 218
1969. ,
, 1991.
[7].
Lee- . [6],
( )
20% 10% 50 (. 224 475 ,
).
80 cm/s2 I, 140 cm/s2 II, 180
cm/s2 III, - 1971. ,
44
.
1969. , 1973. 1986.
,
, 1971.
2.0 3.0
.
79
TR 36043, ,
.
1
Akademia Nauk SSSR (1980). Seismicheskoe Reionirovanie Teritorii SSSR, Izdatalstvo
Nauka. Moscow.
2
Karnik, F. (1972). Microzoning Program within the UNDP-UNESCO Survey of the
Seismicity of the Balkan Region, Proc. Microzonation Conference, Seattle, WA, I, 213
215.
3
Liao, Z. (1985). Seismic Microzonation of China, Institute of Engineering Mechanics,
State Seismological Bureau, Research Report, 137.
4
Medvedev, S. V. (1962). Inzenjernaya Seizomologiya, Akademia Nauk SSSR, Institut
Fizaiki Zemli Imeni O. Smidta, Moskva.
5
Trifunac, M.D. (2012). Earthquake Response Spectra for Performance based Design A
Critical Review, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 37(6), 73-83.
6
Lee, V.W., M.I. Mani, B.. Bulaji, D. Herak, M. Herak, and M.D. Trifunac (2015).
Microzonation of Banja Luka for performance-based earthquake-resistant design, Soil
Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, in press.
7
Stojkovi M., Kirijas T., Mihailov V., Petrovski J., Paskalov T., Bikovski B., Galbov
S., and R. Kapsarov (1971). Seismic microzonation of Banja Luka, Report No. S-21/71,
Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology (IZIIS), Skopje.
8
Milne, J. (1881). Experiments in observational seismology, Trans. Seism. Soc. Japan, 3,
12-64.
9
Milne, J. (1885). Seismic experiments, Trans. Seism. Soc. Japan, 8, 1-82.
10 Perry, J. (1881). Note on rocking of a column, Trans. Seism. Soc. Japan, 3, 103-106.
11 Omori, F. (1900). On the overturning and sliding of columns (in Japanese), Publication
Earthquake Investigation Committee, 32, 19-33.
12 Ikegami, R. and Kishinouye, F. (1947). A study on the overturning of rectangular
columns in the case of the Nankai earthquake on December 21, 1946, Bull. Earthquake
Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ., 25, 49-55.
13 Ikegami, R. and Kishinouye, F. (1950). The acceleration of earthquake motion deduced
from overturning of the gravestones in case of Imaichi earthquake on Dec, 26, 1949,
Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ.,28, 121-128.
14 Ishiyama, Y. (1980). Review and discussion on overturning of bodies by earthquake
motions, BRI Research Paper No. 85, Ministry of Construction, 1-115.
15 Ishiyama, Y. (1982). Motions of rigid bodies and criteria for overturning by earthquake
excitations, Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn., 10,633-650.
16 Abadi, A.H, Gad, E., Lam. N. and Petrolito J. (2013) A Simple Model for Estimating
Shocks in Unrestrained Building Contents in an Earthquake, Journal of
EarthquakeEngineering, 17(8), 1126-1140.
17 Lipscombe, P.R. and Pellegrino, S. (1993). Free rocking of prismatic blocks, J. Eng.
Mech., ASCE, 119(7), 1387-1410.
80
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Makris, N. and Roussos, Y. [2000] Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source
ground motions, Gotechnique, 3, 243262.
Gazetas, G., Garini, E., Berrill, J.B. and Apostolou, M. (2012). Sliding and overturning
potential of Christchurch 2011 earthquake records, Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn.,
41,19211944.
Voyagaki, E., Psycharis, I.N. and Mylonakis, G. (2013). Rocking response and
overturning criteria for free standing rigid blocks to single lobe pulses, Soil Dynamics
and Earthquake Engineering, 46, 8595.
Brune, J.N., Anooshehpoor, A., Shi, B. and Zeng, Y. (2004). Precarious Rock and
Overturned Transformer Evidence for Ground Shaking in the Ms 7.7 Kern County
Earthquake: An Analog for Disastrous Shaking from a Major Thrust Fault in the Los
Angeles Basin, Bull. Seism.Soc. of America, 94(6), 19932003.
Shi, B., Anushehpoor, A.,Zeng, Y. and Brune, J.N. (1996). Rocking and overturning of
precariously balanced rocks by earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. America, 86(5), 13641371.
Trkulja, D., (2009). Earthquakes in Banja Luka. In: Seismology and Engineering
Seismology (Ai, M. and Trkulja, D., Eds.). International Conference on Earthquake
Engineering, Banja Luka, 4357.
Stojkovi M.B. (2009). Seismic microzoning of the city of Banja Luka area,
Proceedings of the International conference on earthquake engineering, October 26-28,
2009, Banja Luka, Book 4 - Seismology and engineering seismology, pp. 345-357.
Jordanovski, L.R., Lee, V.W., Mani, M., Olumeva, T., Sinadinovski, C., Todorovska,
M.I., and Trifunac, M.D. (1987). Strong earthquake ground motion data in EQINFOS:
Yugoslavia, Part 1, Dept. of Civil Eng. Rep., No. 87-15, Los Angeles, California: Univ.
of Southern California.
Trifunac, M.D. (2009). 75th Anniversary of Strong Motion Observation A Historical
Review, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(4), 591-606.
Trifunac, M.D. and Ivanovi, S.S. (2003). Reoccurrence of Site Specific Response in
Former Yugoslavia Part II: Friuli, Banja Luka and Kopaonik, Soil Dynamics and
Earthquake Eng., 23(8), 663-681.
Trifunac, M.D., V.W. Lee, M. ivi, and M.I. Mani (1991). On the correlation of
Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg intensity scale in Yugoslavia with the peaks of recorded
strong earthquake ground motion, European Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.
27-33.
Mani, M.I., Bulaji, B.. and Trifunac M.D. (2015). note on peak accelerations
computed from sliding of objects during the 1969 Banja Luka Earthquakes in former
Yugoslavia, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (accepted for publication).
Trifunac, M.D. (1990). A Microzonation Method Based on Uniform Risk Spectra, Soil
Dynamics and Earthquake Eng., 9(1), 34-43.
Lee, V.W. and Trifunac, M.D. (1987). Microzonation of a metropolitan area,
Department of Civil Engineering. Report CE 87-02. University of Southern California,
Los Angeles, California.
Lee, V.W., Herak, M., Herak, D. and Trifunac, M.D. (2010). Uniform Hazard Spectra in
Northwestern Bosna and Hercegovina, Izgradnja, 64(5-6), 282-304.
81
33
34
35
36
Lee, V.W., Herak, M., Herak, D. and Trifunac, M.D. (2013). Uniform Hazard Spectra in
western Balkan Peninsula, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Soil Dynamics
and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 55, pp. 1-20.
Seed, H.B., I.M. Idriss, F.W. Kiefer (1968). Characteristics of rock motions during
earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. EERC 68-5,
September 1968, College of Eng., University of California, Berkeley, California.
Trifunac, M.D. (1990). How to Model Amplification of Strong Earthquake Motions by
Local Soil and Geologic Site Conditions, Int. J. Earthquake Eng. and Structural
Dynamics, 19(6), 833-846.
Trifunac, M.D. (2008). The Nature of Site Response During Earthquakes, Proc. NATO
ARW workshop in Borovec, 30 August 3 September, 2008, Bulgaria, published in
Coupled Site and Soil-Structure Interaction effects with Applications to Seismic Risk
Mitigation (T. Schantz and R.Iankov editors), NATO Science for Piece and Security
Series C: Environmental Security, 3-31, Springer Science + Business Media, B. V.
2009.
82
1, 2, 3
:
2014.
. .
o
2014. .
,
.
: , ,
1
. . . - ,
zoran.knezevic@jcerni.co.rs
2
. . . - ,
vladislava.bartos@jcerni.co.rs
3
. . . - , zvonimir.kocic@srbijavode.rs
83
1
2014. ,
, ,
, ,
.
a 12. 19. 2014. ,
.
.
, .
,
, .
2014. .
, ,
.
, ,
. :
- (km 0+000 km 4+790)
- (km 4+790-km 6+277)
- (km 6+277 - km 8+722)
- 10
,
(km 8+722 km 9+780).
km 9+780 .
1
, 7 5 .
.
=100 ,
Q=180 m3/s.
3
,
.
. 2014.
.
84
24 41,4 mm .
, 81,6 mm,
. 12. ,
16.
Hmax=408 cm, 1 m
H=313 cm (16. 1999. ).
, km 12+383
. .
. , ,
, , , , .
.
, ,
.
,
. 1
, (
).
1 -
4
,
, .
85
4.1 2014.
2014.
.
,
.
,
, .
,
.
.
, .
, ,
. ,
, ,
, n 0,125 m-1/3s 0,1 m -1/3s. ,
,
260 m3/s.
HEC-RAS (Hydrologic
Engineering Center - River Analysis System).
, ,
.
,
: 0,025 m-1/3s (
) 0,04 m-1/3s ( ),
0,04-0,06 m-1/3s; 0,04-0,06 m-1/3s;
0,1-0,125 m-1/3s.
.
2 -
86
.
,
.
260 m3/s. ,
100-120 m3/s.
.
, ,
.
4.2
295 km2 ( 3), je
.
(159 km2). 5,3 km .
289 km2. ..
1925. . 1958. -
, 1959. . 19251958. .
, 1959-2013. 1959-2014. .
1959-2013.
, 2014.
.
..
.
2- -. Log-Pearson III ,
.
3 - ..
87
1959-2014. Q1%=255 m3/s.
,
4, (
SCS ).
4 -
4.3
Q=180 m3/s. , 13
.
n=0,033-0,035 m-1/3s. ,
, .
.
, ,
(Q=180 m3/s),
. , 120130 m3/s. Q=180 m3/s ( )
, .
70 cm.
(km 6+060) ,
. km 8 .
88
5 (
)
K / ,
( , 1,2 m).
Q=180 m3/s .
,
,
Q1%=255 m3/s.
Q1%=255 m3/s , / .
,
1 m. Q1%=255 m3/s ,
1,42 m.
.
89
5
25.000 ,
.
,
=100 (
1%).
.
.
, , ,
.
. ,
. ,
(
),
.
,
,
.
,
1%
(Q1%=255 m3/s).
, .
/
Q=180 m3/s, ,
(Q1%=255 m3/s) 1 m
.
1 m,
,
.
[1] ,
, ., , 2001.
[2]
, , , 2007.
[3] a - ,
, 2009.
90
1, 2, 3,
4
:
k .
,
, .
( 30%
) ,
.
, k
.
: k , ,
91
-2-
1.
k ,
.
, .
k:
-
;
- ;
- ;
- ;
- , ;
- (Building IT, Building
Management Sistems...).
1. IBCM
,
,
.
,
.
92
-3-
,
.
, : SMART
HOME, SMART HOUSE, , POWER HOUSE, INTELIGENT HOUSE, -HOUSE.
,
, , .
2.
,
,
.
,
,
(. 19
;
).
25-30%,
.
.
.
:
- ;
- ;
- ;
- ;
- , , -;
- ;
-
.
, ,
,
.
,
.
,
.
, , , ,
.
,
. , ,
93
-4-
.
, , ,
.
,
.
:
- ;
- ;
- ;
- ;
- , ;
- (, , ) ;
- ;
- ;
- .
:
- ;
- ;
- ;
/ .
2. TACH PANEL
""
("
", " ", " ", "", " ", " ",
"", "", "", "", "", " ", " ", "
", " "...).
, , .
94
-5-
.
,
.
, -,
,
,
-
.
.
,
, ,
.
(: ,
, , -. ,
. ,
, , ...)
3.
, ,
,
, . .
, . ,
.
,
95
-6-
/
.
/ :
- split ;
- fancoil ;
- ;
- ;
- ;
- .
" "
30% 50%
,
.
4.
k,
,
- .
k ,
,
.
,
,
96
-7-
, ,
.
, .
.
, k 25,00
/2 . 1.000 4.000 ,
4.000 12.000 .
.
(
-
, , .)
.
( k).
.
k
15 ,
.
,
, ,
.
,
.
5.
X10 .
97
-8-
, ,
X10 .
220V 120Khz.
X10 :
- 256 ;
- ;
- ;
-
;
- ;
- ;
- ( ).
3.
, .
,
.
, :
- IBCM , . ;
- INFINITY, . , ;
- - XENON, .
;
- Raiffeisen , 66 , ;
- - VIG Plaz, 11, .
k
,
.
k
. :
, , ,
,
.
. O ,
,
. ,
,
.
98
-9-
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
99
1, 2, 3, 4
2014.
:
2014.
. :
, , ,
, , ,
.
,
, .
: , , 2014. , ,
, , , .
. , . . , , , Stevan.Prohaska@jcerni.co.rs
. , ,
3
. . , ,
4
. , ,
2
101
1.
2014.
. , , ,
.
().
.
, , , 14.04.
05.05. 2014. .
.
, , , .
, , 12. 19.
2014. : , ,
, , ,
, ,
.
,
.
. ,
.
,
2008. .
2.
2014.
, 2014.
, ,
.
102
14.
05. 2014.
120 l/m2 170 l/m2,
250 l/m2.
2014.
,
, ,
.
13.
, 14. 16.
() ,
( ).
1. 325 , 12
, ,
19.05.2014.
, ,
( , ).
,
, .
, , ,
, , 14. 18.
2014. , , ,
200 l/m2, 300 l/m2. ,
14. 05. ,
120 l/m2 170 l/m2,
250 l/m2. , ,
, ( ),
(), ,
.
103
3.
2014.
.
,
28
,
450 .
( . 18), , ,
()
.
,
.
2. 1
,
1219.05.2014.
2014.
. 1.
.
(188,3 mm), (179,1 mm),
(179,0 mm), (133,8 mm), (130,8 mm) .
( ) 320 mm, 280
mm. 200 mm
.
2014. ,
. ,
mm/.
,
.
()
104
. ,
: 1 , 3 , 6
, 12 , 24 , 48 72 .
39.
. . 2
.
o a
,
.
( . 3) , ,
.
, .
,
, .4. (
. 5) ,
,
, .
3. 3 ,
1219.05.2014.
4. 6 ,
1219.05.2014.
105
24- ( . 6)
12- ,
. 48- (
. 7) ,
()
.
72- ( . 8)
,
, ,
.
6. 24 ,
1219.05.2014.
5. 12 ,
1219.05.2014.
106
7. 48 ,
1219.05.2014.
8. 72 ,
1219.05.2014.
4.
,
. , . , , , 2014. ,
.
2008. .
()
: 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 360, 720 1440 .
-
, . 30
2014. .
107
,
2014. .
. 9
, .
9. a
. 1.
, ( )
.
, ,
.
Pep,
, . ,
, mm,
(g) 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 72 .
108
1.
2014.
1h
3h
6h
12h
24h
48h
72h
Pep
mm
T(g)
mm
T(g)
mm
T(g)
mm
T(g)
mm
T(g)
mm
T(g)
mm
T(g)
12-19.05.2014.
79.2
188.3
2.38
11.1
24.2
<2
34.5
<2
59.8
105.0
125
163.4
1000
176.1
450
67.8
179.1
2.64
12.5
21.8
37.3
66.8
20
103.9
100
158.2
400
172.3
625
64.7
106.2
1.64
13.1
30.3
43.3
10
67.3
100
84.0
50
96.8
80
100.1
80
57.8
133.8
2.31
7.5
18.4
<2
33.5
60.9
81.1
20
107.5
50
131.3
110
80.7
179.0
2.12
5.5
15.0
27.7
<2
53.8
97.4
60
149.4
400
164.2
650
. 1
2014. :
.
7 .
56 ,
.
12- 100
.
24 . , , 24-
, ,
, .
48 ,
, 400 , 80- .
625650 .
450 ,
110 .
, ,
. 1,64 2,64,
64% 164%.
109
5.
, 2014.
,
, ,
, - ,
.
, ,
, .
2014. ,
, .
: , .
, ,
,
2014.
.
(-37005) 20112015.
.
.
1.
2.
3.
, ., .,
(2014), , , ISBN 978-86-82565-40-6.
, ., ., ., .,
., ., ., (2011), ,
XLI, -, 34/2011, ISSN 0350-5049, str. 514.
Spatial interpolation of selected characteristicsof high intensity rainfall in Serbia using
GIS technology,, ., ., , ., , ., , .,
, ., , ., , . (2011), XXV Conference of the Danubian
countries on the hydrological forecasting and hydrological bases of water management,
1617 June 2011, Budapest, Hungary, rad na USB-u 8 str., Conference Abstracts pp. 65,
2011.
110
4.
5.
,, ., , ., , ., , .,
, ., , ., , . (2011),
, ISSN 0350-5049, Vol. 41, No. 34, str. 514, 2011.
2014. , ., ., . (2014),
, 7, . 189201, ISBN 978-86-904985-9-8,
COBISS. RS ID 208242444.
111
,1 2
:
"",
- 2014.,
( 100 ),
,
( 2000 , , , ,
.) ,
, 100 .
, ,
, ,
, , , .
: , , , .
113
1.
2014.,
.
12. 19. 2014..
( , , ,
, , ). ,
, , ,
,
. .,
.
(- ) , , ,
. 20-25%
.
, .
, ,
, , ,
. ()
, ,
.
, ,
, .
, ,
,
.
2.
, ,
.
11. 17. 2014.,
200mm, ., , , ,
... .
, ,
, ,
,
.
I II ,
- 2014.., 2000 ,
, 160-170 ,
,
, -
.
1 I II ,
( 320 ), 2005.-
2014. ( )
2014.( 160 ).
, ,
, , , (
2). ,
.
, , , 3000
, , ,
-
.
, -
2014., 3-6, 4 ( )
. ,
,
.
, ,
, , , ,
.
115
.
,
,
.
, ,
. , I II
100 .
, ,
2014. 15. 2015. , 50
.
, .
1
( 2005. 1.3.2014.)
116
2 ,
1.3.2014.
117
4 IIA-170 -
. ,
300m.
,
, .
118
5 IIA-139, : , km:10+950
11+070.
120m 200m.
6- IB-28, - .
200250m; 200m
.
119
3.
?
( ) ,
,
, :
.
, () ,
,
, ,
() ,
, (,
, ) ( ,
).
, 12.-17. 2014.., ()
() ,
, ,
, , ,
, 100 250 l/m2,
.
,
, , ,
,
( , , , .)
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
( ) .
,
, ,
. , ,
(), ,
, ,
, ,
,
.
,
.
` ,
,
,
, .
120
,
.
, ( )
, , ,
,
, (
, ),
, . ,
, , , ,
. ,
( , , , , ,
, , .),
,
(, , ,
, .).
, ,
( , )
( .),
,
, ( ) (
). ,
,
, ` , , ,
. (
, , .),
( , , , .),
, . ,
, ,
.
4.
()
,
, ,
, , , , ,
.,
,
.
: () , ,
, ,
,
121
,
.
, ,
. ( 10-20 )
, ,
, .
,
, ,
.
5.
, ,
,
,
, ,
. .
[1] / .//
N0 1-2 (1944)
[2]
- 2014. /.,., . . ,
.,. // 0350-0519,.46(267272),(2014).
[3] ,
, ,
,, , , ,.
122
1, 2 , 3
J
'' ''
:
2014. .,
'' ''
, .
,
.
e 160 m 380 m e,
.
: , ,
123
1.
15 18. 2014. . ,
, , , -
, .
, , .
-
'' ''.
.1.
,
, ()
(.2. ), (.2. )
, .
, , ,
. ,
. -
.
5-7m. , ,
, , .
, ,
.
,
.
,
. ,
. ,
()
( .),
.
2.
, ,
, ,
,
3 km, 300 m, km 2+400 km 2+700
, .
2,4 km, 8,6 km2.
, , (
) ()
(. 2),
. ,
,
.
,
.
124
,
, .
,
, .
. 1. = 1:25.000 ()
3 km
. 2: -
- . .
3.
,
.
(675 mnm) 30. , ,
, .
125
.
.
, , -- . ,
, . , 2014. .,
.
.
,
- ,
- .
( 3.). , , - (21,2).
- (Sep) (Qse).
,
(2 1),
(1), (11,2).
: , , ,
(J2,3) (q) (M),
. (al) (t1)
.
.3: [2 ]:
126
, , , .
,
-
, .
, , - - .
, ,
-
. .
- , ,
,
, .
,
.
. -
,
, .
4.
4.1.
'' -
''[1], 1969. .
,
100 m, .
() 2014. .
. , ,
180 m
,
() .
,
" ", , :
-
160 m, 280 m. 6%.
- , 1969.
, ( 4), 9,92 m2,
5,76 m2, 4,16 m2.
4.2.
()
'' '', -
127
, SCS
.
ITP (
),
.
(Shuttle Radar Topography Mission), CORINE 2006 Land
Cover .
1.
4. -
" ",
1 - ()
'' ''
No
p
(%)
0,1
1,0
2,0
5,0
T
(god)
1000
100
50
20
Qmax
(m3/s)
92,5
60,8
51,5
39,8
Tp
(as)
1,1
1,1
1,1
1,1
1
2
3
4
je:
p [%]
T [god]
Qmax [m3/s]
Tp [as]
Tk [min]
P [mm]
Pef [mm]
W [103 m3]
128
Tk
(min)
30
30
30
30
P
(mm)
72,7
55,0
49,6
42,5
Pef
(mm)
45,1
29,6
25,1
19,4
W
(m3/s)
390,0
256,0
217,1
167,8
4.3. 2014.
, 2014. ,
, ()
. 12.06.2014. ,
, -
" ". a
,
.
- 160 m.
.4, Id = 6,0%,
Zd = 265,89 mnm
Zk= 268,34 mnm.
,
271,19 mnm. , ,
. 5 ,
,
1,0 m. , , , Zgv =
272,19 mnm, .
5 - ( - 12.6.2014.) -
15.05. 2014. ( )
5 , 2014.
, .
,
.
, "C" ( 6).
129
. 6 -
Vgv 2
Vc 2
(1 ul ) -
2g
2g
, :
H gv
Cap
1 ul
hc
A 2 g (Hgv
Vgv 2
2g
Ca D) 32,0 m3 /s
(1)
(2)
:
Q
(32 m3/s)
(6,3 m)
Hgv
( ,
Vgv
Vgv 0 m/s)
A
(5,74 m2)
(0,68)
Cap
(0,6)
Ca
D
(2,45 m)
(0,4)
ul
g
(9,81 m/s2)
, , :
H gv
:
Hgv
Vgv
Hi
Vi
L
D
Vgv 2
2g
Hi
Vi 2
L
(1 ul ) -
2g
D
(6,3 m)
( Vgv = 0 m/s)
(1,45 m)
(8,2 m/s)
(160 m)
( 2,5 m)
( = 125 n2/D1/3 = 0,045)
130
(3)
, , 1,45 m,
, .6,
.
,
- (.7),
, ,
.
7 -
,
. ,
, ,
, (0,2).
.
380 m - , '' ''.
-
- 160 m, 1,5 m
( h=1,5 m), -
, :
(4)
Q = 1/n A R2/3 J1/2 = 38,8 m3/s
:
Q
(38,8 m3/s)
n
(0,037 m-1/3s)
(7,5 m2)
R
(0,94 m)
(8,0 m)
J
(4%)
Q = 38,8 m3/s
- - (Q = 32,0 m3/s),
380 m 131
-, Q = 38,8 m3/s - -
15. 2014. ,
.
2014. . 5%, 20 .,
32,0 m3/s,
10 (Q10%). 8,0
m/s.
5.
, :
- , ,
,
.
, ,
, .
-
220 m, 380 m,
,
3 m (.4).
.
- ,
44,5 .
- ,
.
,
.
-
32 m3,
10 . ,
,
2014.
- ( )
" " -
, ,
32 m3/s
, .
132
[1] '' -
'', '''' 1969.
[2] 1:100.000 ,
1975.
[3] a - ,
" " , 2009.
133
1, 2, 3
:
, .
,
. ,
,
, .
.
: ,
. . ., - , ,
, 11000 , II 61, e-meil:
v.vujanic944@gmail.com
2
. . , , , ,, 38, 11000
, e-meil: slnedeljkovic@sbb.rs
3
. . ., 11000 , 43, e-meil: mjotic@hotmail.rs
135
1.
,
. ,
( ), ,
, .
,
?
, 100
, . ,
, 100
, . ,
, .
, ,
, .
, , ,
, .
.
2.
, : ,
. ,
.
.
, . ,
, ,
( ), ,
, .
, . ,
, , ,
.
,
. ,
, (. ).
, ,
, ,
.
,
. , ,
136
,
, .
,
. ,
, .
, ,
. ,
:
P ( a) 1 e a
, .
,
, . , ,
,
. ,
,
, , , () ,
, , 2014 ..
, () ,
, , 2014
, ,
.
, ( ),
,
,
, ()
, ( ).
? , ( )
,
1975 1997 , , 1.
, , , 2014 ,
, , ,
, - ( ,
), , ( )
( ), .
, , , ,
,
1950 2000 1000
() , , ,
, 2.
137
1. ( 2007.)
2. 1950 2000
2020, (, 2004)
138
3.
,
,
, , ,
,
, ,
. ,
. , ,
.
, ,
, ,
, .
. , ,
( ). ,
,
.
, ,
.
, ,
, ,
.
10 15 . ,
15 ,
,
, .
, ,
. 3,
. , ,
3, .
, ,
, () , ,
.
,
,
, . ,
,
. ,
,
. , ,
, , .
139
,
,
.
, , ,
, , .
,
. ,
500 , 4.
,
(- - ).
,
, , ,
, . 4,
, ,
.
Na P=1700 km
Registrovano 2350
klzita
- Aktivna
42 km
- Umirena 87 km
(2,5%)
(5,1%)
2
3.
140
4. 500
,
,
( , - ).
. ,
, ,
,
, .
4.
,
,
.
.
, ,
. ,
, .
141
,
,
, , .
,
, ,
. ,
.
:
[1]
/..
, . , . // ,
1992. (207 218)
[2]
/. , . , . , .
// ,
, 1998; (317 324)
[3]
/.
, . , . , . //.
, 2008. (49 52)
[4] /. , . , .
// II , 2009..
[5] /.
, . , . // , ()
[6] /.
, . , . // X
, 2014 (281-292)
[7] . ,
.
142
:
.
,
.
.
: , , ,
. , . . ,
143
1.
, ,
,
( 0 - 9, 63 ),
:
0 (SRPS EN 1990): ,
1 (SRPS EN 1991): ,
2 (SRPS EN 1992): ,
3 (SRPS EN 1993): ,
4 (SRPS EN 1994): ,
5 (SRPS EN 1995): ,
6 (SRPS EN 1996): ,
7 (SRPS EN 1997): ,
8 (SRPS EN 1998): ,
9 (SRPS EN 1999): .
, ,
, (, , o...),
.
, .
.
(ENV).
.
(EN), 2006. 0
, 2, 3 4 ( ). , 2009.
12 , 17 ,
.
2. SRPS
,
, (EN)
, ,
(SRPS EN). , ,
,
().
144
. o ,
, 1948. ,
. ,
.
, (SRPS
EN)
:
1. U250-1,8: 0, 1 8 - ,
2. U250-2: 2 -
3. U250-3,4,9: 3, 4 9 -
,
4. U250-5,6: 5 6 -
5. U182: 7
(58 63)
(SRPS EN), (14), (42),
.
.
( ) SRPS EN .
()
.
.
1:
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
:
1
10
9
20
3
3
4
2
6
5
63
SRPS EN
1
0
1
4
6
10
1
3
4
5
15
20
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
3
4
0
2
2
0
6
6
0
5
5
14
45
58
1
5
0
20
3
0
0
0
0
5
34
,
.
145
.
( , ,
...),
(, , , .), ,
,
().
(NDP):
,
, ;
( );
(NCCI)!
34 58 ,
( 1). ,
( 0) (,
) ,
1:
SRPS EN 1991: 1-1: ,
;
SRPS EN 1991: 1-7: ;
SRPS EN 1991: 3: ;
SRPS EN 1991: 4: .
,
,
. ,
,
, (),
( ).
,
SRPS EN ,
. ,
!
(, , , ...),
,
,
, .
()
.
3.
3.1 - 0, 1 8
, , ,
146
147
EN 206: : , ,
;
EN 10080: ;
EN 10138: ;
EN 12390: ;
EN 12791: ;
hEN:
.
:
SRPS EN 1992-1-2:
SRPS EN 1992-2:
SRPS EN 1992-3: .
3.3 - 3, 4 9
,
.
,
.
.
, ,
.
( , ...).
SRPS EN 1090-2:
2: (210
.), ,
.
,
:
SRPS EN 1993-2: 3 2:
(100 .);
SRPS EN 1993-1-9: 3 1-9:
(35 .);
SRPS EN 1993-1-11: 3 1-11:
(35 .);
SRPS EN 1994-2: 4
2: (90 .);
SRPS EN 1993-1-2: 3 1-2:
(80 .);
SRPS EN 1994-1-2: 4
1-2:
(110 .);
148
3.4 - 5 6
, SRPS EN 1995-1-1: - 1-1:
SRPS EN 1996-1-1: 1-1: , .
, , 5
6,
. ,
, :
EN 338: ;
EN 384:
;
EN 408:
;
EN 1194:
;
EN 26891:
;
EN 1015-11: 11:
;
EN 1052-1: 1:
;
EN 1052-2: 2:
;
EN 1052-3: 3:
.
, SRPS
EN :
SRPS EN 1995-1-2: 5 1-2:
;
SRPS EN 1995-2: 5 2:
;
SRPS EN 1996-1-2: 6 1-2:
;
SRPS EN 1996-2: 6 2:
, ;
SRPS EN 1996-3: 6 3:
149
3.5 - 7
. SRPS EN 1997-1
. .
.
4.
,
.
.
:
;
;
;
;
(
);
;
.
,
,
( 0-9).
150
-
:
.
,
.
,
,
.
,
476, - , 1+400.
: , , , ,
APPLICATION
OF
ANCHORED
RC
GRILLAGE
STRUCTURES FOR LANDSLIDES REHABILITATION
Summary:
This paper presents application of reinforced concrete anchored grid structure for
landslides rehabilitation. Structure consists of horizontal and vertical reinforced
concrete beams, anchored at their intersection with geotechnical anchors. These
structures are applicable to places where it is risk of landslides and rock fragments
fall, caused by loose or cracked rock material due to construction work, as well as
discontinuities occurring in natural geological processes. There is a description of
real implementation of this type of structure at specific project, design of landslide
rehabilitation on regional road R476, Ukrina Gornja Vijaka, at km 1 + 400.
Keywords: landslide, rehabilitation, slope, grillage construction, anchor
, . ., -- , ,
rvukomanovic@aggfbl.org
151
1.
.
,
.
,
, ,
, ,
.
, , .
.
, :
1. , - , ;
2. , ,
, ;
3. , ;
4. , ,
, ;
5. , ,
, .
, .
,
,
.
.
, ,
,
,
.
,
, .
,
,
, ,
,
.
, ,
,
152
.
, ,
.
,
.
1 [6]
2. O
476, 801,
, 1+400. ,
153
.
, -
30 . , 7,7%.
, 2006. .
,
,
, .
,
, .
25 ,
, .
,
, - ,
3.
60,
, .
6.00 ( ),
0.70 1.00 .
2 ,
, 1000,
.
, ,
,
50 .
3.
,
. , ,
154
-
,
2006.
.
.
,
.
3
,
. ,
,
20 .
,
.
,
, .
.
.
. ,
,
,
,
.
4
4.
7.
155
.
0,5 x 1,5 , () 0,5 x 0,5 , 32 ,
10 , 49 , 2,42 x 2,73 .
5
.
,
.
.
, ,
, , ,
. ,
, 2006. .
,
, 10.0 ,
,
.
, ,
156
. , ,
,
,
.
6
, 32 10.
. 70,
.
,
,
,
,
.
7
157
8
. ,
,
. ,
Winklera .
, .
,
.
-, 1-9.
, 2-9,
8. ,
,
, . ,
, ...
158
9
. ,
.
, .
60%
, .
10
159
5.
,
, ,
,
.
,
,
,
, .
,
.
,
( )
,
.
, ,
,
.
, ,
, .
Me / M. // , , 2005
Earth Pressure and Earth-Retaining Structures / R.I. Clayton, R.I. Woods, A.J. Bond, J.
Milititsky // New York, 2014
Me / . Nonveiler // , 1990
// 15/90, 1990
, , ,
// / , 2005
http://www.geocaching.com/
160
1, 2, 3, 4
:
a
.
( ) o
,
.
. ,
.
. ,
, Pandrol Vanguard.
: , , , Pandrol
Vanguard
. ... ,
. ... ,
3
. ... ,
4
. ... ,
2
161
1.
. 45%
225 kN, 30% 160 kN,
.
225 kN, ,
(, ),
(, , ). , S45,
S49, UIC60.
"".
[1]:
3809 3162 km
. 1286 km 1/3 .
647 km (17%) ,
. 120 km/h,
2012. 93 km/h, 66%
(61 km/h). 2013., 2014. 2015.
.
.
191 km . 1981. 2010.
( ) 38 km 20%,
. 20
10.8% 78.4% ( ).
1995. 2012. 27.9
km/h, 43.4 km/h.
.1
. .
1 - [1]
Table 1 - Average time driving speed trains on the route Belgrade Subotica [1]
1956-1957
1978-1979
1980
1991-1995
1995-2000
2000-2008
2008-2010
2010-2013
4h
2h 30min
2h 30min
2h 30min
2h 50min
3h 10min
3h 30min
4h
160 km/h
120 km/h .
.
.
425 km . 35
km/h 75 km/h 100 km/h.
.
162
.
:
-
- ,
-
- ,
- ,
- ,
, ,
, (
),
, ,
[2,5].
2. K
. .
2.1
.
,
.
.
.
1,
2.
1 - e
[2]
Figure 1 - Fastening systems for wood sleepers K [2]
163
2 - [3]
Figure 2 - Technical characteristics of fastening the system K for wooden sleepers [3]
-
, .
3.
3 - [2,3]
Figure 3 - Results of measurement system fastening [2,3]
.
.
.
.
2.2
.
.
4.
.
164
4 - [6]
Figure 4 - Impacts on the coupling of the elastic fastening systems and model-relianc [6]
( ) .
(, ).
, , ,
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
-
.
2.2.1 VOSSLOH
5 - Skl 12 - [5]
Figure 5 - The system fastening Skl 12 and force-time fastening [5]
SKL12 213
N, 16.7 N. SKL14 .
.
165
.
.
2 - [4]
Table 2 - Development of fastening system [4]
3 - [4]
Table 3 - Development of fastening system [4]
2.2.2
)
S-300 Skl 15 :
- :
- R 300m
-
- GI-
- Skl15 9 N
-
2.2.3 RN
RN 1948. ( 7 )
( 7 ).
.
.
7 - RN [5]
Figure 7 - The system fastening RN [5]
2.2.4 SSK
, .
, .
.
, ,
.
167
8 - SSK [2]
Figure 8 - Elastic fastenings SSK [2]
2.3 PANDROL
Pandrol [7,8].
.
.
, .
)
)
3.
. ,
.
, .
, ,
. ,
. Pandrol,
168
.
.
169
1, 2, 32
:
,
.
.
,
.
: ,
--
--
3
. . .
2
171
1.
.
, ,
.
-
.
20m, 35.
,
badrock.
,
10m .
- ,
. GEO
STUDIO, SLOPE/W,
. -
.
kx=0,1 kx=0,2.
.
172
2.
p=100 kN/m2
=21 kN/m3
=28
c=0kPa
Minimalni faktori
sigurnosti za proracun
stabilnosti kosine za
razlicitekategorije
materijala 1
Fs Faktor sigurnosti
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.0
2.8
2.6
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
1I
173
m aterial 1
=21 kN/m3
pn=250kPa
b=32
=12
m aterial 2
bedrock
III
Minimalni faktori sigurnosti za
proracun stabilnosti kosine za
razlicitekategorije materijala 1
12
3.6
3.4
32
3.2
1.3807
3.0
c
2.8
0.7276
2.6
29
30
31
Pn=250kPa
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
IV
3. SPT CPT
CPT , ,
174
. CPT ,
2 cm/s.
:
-
-
-
-
-
:
-
-
CPT :
- 2cm
-
-
- CPT
-
-
:
V CPT
175
(MN/m2)
N (SPT)
3.1.1
SPT
, .
,
,
().
(m)
()
>10
1.00
176
6-10
0.95
4-6
0.85
3-4
0.75
I
.
R,
( )
. ,
N60, N R u
vrijednosti 60%.
N60= R/60xN,
:
- N -
- R
4.
,
,
( )
. ( )
, ,
.
.
, . ,
.
( ) ,
.
(ohr- Coulomb) .
,
,
.
177
In-Situ
Soil
Testing/
Piezocone,
http://www.conepenetration.com/onlinebook/piezocone/piezocone-conepenetration-test-with-porewater-pressure-management,
2011
Geotechnical Engineerig: Soli and Fundation Principles and Practice
Richard L.H. and Spangler M.G., Fifth edition, MC Graw- Hill 2007
, 3./ EUROCODE 7, 1994
5
6
178
Aeo o1
, ..,
, (andjelko.cumbo@gmail.com)
179
1
, (X ) [1],
(), , ,
(, ).
.
() :
(), , ()
(). , ,
(),
-
.
aaa e a oa ejaa ,
oeeee ea aaeaa aejaa. eoaa e a
oa o aoja aa eea eoa
, a eao aoee eoaja o oeo eea.
a eea o jeaa, aaj eoaja je eaa ja a e
ae eoe eea ( c -eo, a -, s -, p -), a oe aj k -
a :
(1)
a,k
a,k
r
r
Es
s,k
s,k
r r*
r
r
r
pr
Ec(k ,k 1)
* ;
Ep
c,k
p ,k
p ,k 0 p ,k
c,k
(2)
(3)
* *
(4)
eaa aoee ( ):
K k qT k Qk Q*c,k Q*p,k
(5)
e aa o oaa e e o a o oeaa.
eoa jeaa je a e aea jeaa, e oe ea
aaea aejaa eea eooa oja eoa .
180
Maa o eo E ea eoa, , M k -
:
(6)
K k K c,k K a,k K s,k K p,k
oeje ae o e aj o oejeaa ae o
ooeo aa a a Em,k S m,k / l , m c, a, s, p , S m ,k je a oea
oe oeo eea oo a eee o.
, , ooaj ee oe aa Tk
, ae o. oe oa aa o je
oea o oee eeaao oa eoaja eoa Ec(k ,k 1)
oaaa/ o/ ojea oo eea.
u T T u ; U T T U T
Jeaa aoee
aoaje je:
(7)
oeao
oao
K k qT k Q k Q *c,k Q *p,k
(8)
T k
c,k
p,k
(10)
(11)
2.1
aaa ooeaa eoa a (. 1.)
o e oeaaa oa
a a o aj oeo ajaa. j oe
oje a ea je aa, a ea a oee eee ae
aooaaj. oo e
eo ojaj oeee eo, ae eo o a oaj eoae,
j. eoa je oaao (. 2.).
o je oj e a e oj E, o je o a jaa
aja a, o eeae ooae je, e eaea
ao jaa o ae je, a ooaa ja a
oo oeaa o eaje a a oa j (
. 3.).
c*
M c*
T,c
*
NN,c*
c*
-N2c*
*
-N N2c
*
NN1c
N1c*
(NN1c+NN2c)/2
*
182
Q*c,k
0
A S 0
N1*
I
S
I
S
T*1
T
l
l
l
l
S
I
0
0 1*
M 1*
Ec(k ,k 1)
*
0
0
A S T* 2
N 2
S
I S
I
*
T2
2* c,k
l l
l
M *
l
2 c ,k
0 S I c,k
(12)
oo aj, o aoee oo a, a oa
aa oee (12), je e. a o aoee o aooe,
eee oa oa, oeaa e a oaa a (. 2.):
N1*c,k N2*c,k
N N* 1c N N* 2c k
(82)
2
a aj oa e je e ee oe ee oao
oeo eea (. 3.). ea je oee a oeeea ea . 3a. jaa
oeaa ajaa oee ea eaoj eoj I ea aa je a . 3b.
o ea eea, eo aa (4), aaaj e ooe eoaje
eoo ea eea (. 1.). aae e, aa (12), oej e e
ooa eeea oje ae a . 3c. 3d. Oe e e ej e
eaoao eea T .
o ea eea, aae a oje aaj o o, e
oae e e aaj, je a o ee a ea eeea oe e o
eea a oo ea (. 3d.). oe ajaa e aoe
oaaj (. 3c.), a ao o, je e o ao oe oa eo
oe a (. 3f.). Ao e e o oeaae
aja a, ae aoe eoaje e ee o
oo. Oo oeo o aje oaa eaa oaa.
oaa E, ea ojeo oe, e oe a oe oa
eeea ( ). Oeaae aja a, ea
a (13), oo o aeje eeao jaaa o a (. 3e.), ao a e
o ae ooa (. 3g.) ojaj eo ae o
e. O e oo aja o aja a o a
oaa .
a e oeaa ao eaa a ee a a oje E, a oaa
E, a oee jaa, aaa aaje a e ea eea,
ea oa ( oe) a aaje N,k (. 2. 3e.):
183
N ,k
1 N N* 1 N N* 2
Er Ak
2
k
(14)
~
Q
a)
b)
M
c)
M c*
d)
NNc*
e)
Nc*
f)
T c*
g)
~
Qc*
3 e e ee oe ee
3 A
eee ea aea jeaa (9) oeje e eo o oeaa a
e ea eea. eoo je oeo e ae oe o
oeaa / aa ea oae oe, je je aa o
aa. ooeae eoaja oaao E e o oe ao
ajaa eoa oeaa a eoe oe ae. Oa oeaa ea ae
aoa oao oa ooa e [4]:
qT k T qT k
(15)
184
BT qT k
k
M k
(16)
eo a je a eeaao o oo e e
N,k M ,k jeaa e o a oo o :
T
BT qT k
k
(17)
; m c,a,s,p
1
k 0
k
(18)
k k 1 k
(19)
Tm Tm
Tm
; m c,a,s,p
k k 1 k
(20)
185
oo. oaa ao a aa oa
E oj e o eaa oaje oe a.
, ,
,
, ( ).
4
aa oaa , aaa ee
eoa, eoa oa oe aoeoj eeoj
a .
eoe oe oaa o oeeea (ooa
oa) oj
.
ea oo oe oe je eaa a oea. oe oea eea,
e e e oae oje oeeea aaaj eoaje, oe je eaa
oee eaaje, e e e oae oje eoaja oeje a aoa.
Taoe je ao a a e o oo, a a o aae a oee
oja e eea ea oee aja, eaaj a eoeee
oje e e eea eaj aj e oee oae oeeea.
aa aoa oaa ooje ejae aae oaaa e
ea, e e a ooaaj aaea aaaa o oa oeae
ooaa, e eoo aeaa oaaa ee aa eeeaa.
oee oo aoa oe e aea aj oje aoa a
aoa eoaa eeeaa oaa ae. Mo e aaa
oej aje, ao o e aae eeje e ojaaaa aaje
ooje aje ea e eoa (. e ooje
aae). Oae aae ooe oaj a oaa, je e oe
oa e oj a eoa aea (. oo e aea,
oae oa eeeaa oa eoo aoa o).
TEATA
[1] . (2014):
, X
- , ,
, . 271-278.
[2] o A., o . (2004): aa aja
e oja,
, , . 203-255.
[3] ., . (2000):
,
. 1-2, , , . 12-19.
[4] eo M. (1988): Meo oa eeeaa, o ae, aea a,
eoa.
186
1, 2
:
.
, .
(RPC).
RPC .
. ,
.
: , , RPC,
1
2
... , , , vecacarevic@gmail.com
..., ...o , , jankoradovanovic87@gmail.com
187
1
.
,
. , , ,
.
.
(Ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete)
.
, .
(Reactive Powder Concrete)
RPC .
, .
,
.
.
2 RPC-
XX Bouygues,
2,5% 13 mm 0,16 mm [1].
(200800 MP) (25150 MP).
,
[2,3].
RPC
. ,
, , .
0,1 m pa do priblino 600 m
.
150600 m. , ,
.
:
,
C-S-H .
188
,
:
- ,
- ,
- ,
- .
-
Sherbrooke 1997. 60m [4]. , 2002. [5].
3
RPC
.
. 1
RPC-.
1 RPC
Figure 1 The ratio of component materials for a typical RPC admixture
. RPC
-
C3 (- )
( ).
, , .
2838%
650 kg m3 . 10%
( )
.
.
()
600 m.
.
189
:
- ,
- C-S-H ,
-
.
- (/) ,
.
.
. - 0,1
0,25.
(SCC).
67% .
, .
.
23%
(67% ).
,
.
4 RPC
RPC 10-15 .
.
.
( , NaCl)
.
. ,
.
RPC 50
, [6].
.
:
- ,
- .
Campbell RPC
[7]. RPC
.
.
.
.
- . RPC
190
,
[7]. ,
.
5
RPC
,
(FRC) (UHPC). ,
RPC .
. 13 mm 0,2 mm (
65) 40 mm 0,5 mm ( 80).
. RPC 1
, RPC 3 , RPC 2
. 1
. 4x4x16 cm
, 10x10x50 cm .
28 , 90 .
1 - [8]
Table 1 - The composition of admixtures [8]
PC 55
(% m+)
13/0,2
40/0,5
(% vol)
RPC 1
RPC 2
230
720
1235
170
0,18
24,5
2,6
190
2,5
230
720
1235
170
0,18
28,5
3,0
190
76
3,5
RPC 3
[kg/m3]
230
720
1235
170
0,18
24
2,5
152
2,0
FRC
UHPC
364
1800
150
0,41
1,8
0,5
76
1,0
364
1800
150
0,41
1,8
0,5
-
5.1
2.
.
.
,
[9].
191
, .
RPC
FRC UHPC 23 .
2
Figure 2 Test results of compressive strength
5.2
3
[8]. RPC 2
. 1 3
. ,
RPC FRC UHPC .
47 .
.
. ,
, .
5.3
90 [10].
. 4 [8].
, .
.
. RPC
192
FRC UHPC .
23 . RPC
UHPC 4.
3
Figure 3 Test results of flexural strength
4
Figure 4 Test results of ductility
. ,
.
UHPC () .
193
6
.
600 .
, .
,
.
. ,
.
,
.
RPC
. ,
.
[1]
Ultra high performance fiber-reinforced concretes (UHPFRC): an overview / P. Rossi
// Proceedings of the Fifth International RILEM Symposium: Fiber-reinforced
concrete (FRC), BEFIB 2000 , 2000, , , . 87100.
[2]
Structural applications of RPC / M. Cheyrezy // FIP International Conference New
Technologies in Structural Engineering, 1997, , .
[3]
Composition of Reactive Powder Concretes / P. Richard, M.Cheyrezy // Cement and
Concrete Research, Vol. 25, No. 7, 1995, . 15011511.
[4]
The Sherbrooke Reactive Powder Concrete Footbridge / P.C. Aitcin, M. Lachemi, R.
Adeline, P. Richard // Structural Engineering International, No. 2, 1998, . 140144.
[5]
Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete // Interim Recommendations,
AFGC/SETRA working group, 2002.
[6]
Concrete Tehnology / A. Neville, J.J. Brooks // Addison Wesley Longman Limited,
1997.
[7]
Report CPAR-SL-98-3: Reactive powder concrete for producing sewer, culvert and
pressure pipes / R.L. Campbell, E.F. Oneil, M.D. Dowd, C. Dauriac // US Army Corps
of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, 1998, , .
[8]
/ M. , . ,
. // , 2004, . 6978.
[9]
/ M. //
- , 2003, .
[10] / . //
- , 1998, .
194
:
,
. ,
.
,
, . .
: , , ,
, sladjanajankovic80@gmail.com, ,
195
1
,
.
.
,
, .
, ,
,
.
,
.
.
, ,
.
.
, , ,
. , ,
, , .
,
. :
, , , ( 4 , 4
), (
, , , , ...).
.
, ,
.
,
, , .
,
.
,
, , .
? : ,
, , , , ,...
.
196
?
,
.
,
,
,
.
2.0 .
,
.
, 18. ,
.
.
.
,
20. . High-tech
,
.
, ,
.
, ,
,... , high-tech
,
. 21. ecotech, green architecture . .
, , ,
.
.
.
.
. ,
. , .
,
.
.
197
,
. ,
, .
2.1
(Bernard
Tschumi)
,
3
. , .
, , , ,
, - .
. :
. : , , , , ,
, ... : , ,
. ,
, .
. input
.
. .
198
1 Jean Nouvel, 100 Eleventh Avenue, New York Manhattan, Project 2010
.
, ,
, .
, , 1.
2.2
, ,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,
.
.
.
, . ,
, , , , ,
, , , ,
.
.
.
199
,
, .
,
.
,
.
,
5 .
, ,
,
,
.
.
, ,
.
/, . , 2,
,
, ( ),
( ),
,
.
, .
.
.
.
2.2.1 /
, ,
.
, .
,
.
.
(3)
.
.
:
201
3Mountain Residence
2, / ,
, ,
. 3
.
, 2 (
, )
. .
:,
, , , .
.
10-20 , .
.
,
.
.
.
.
3.0
,
,
, .
,
.
,
.
( 4 5), .
/
.
202
4 , , 1971.
5 , , 2010
4.0
203
, ,
.
.
( ).
?
.
/
.
, copy/paste,
.
. ,
.
. .
, ,
., ,
.
- /
, //, , 1994 (),
132.
/
// 20 (2011) , 153-159
/ // BusinessArt, Milano,
2014
a -
/ //
2012
204
/Jean Nouvel//www.sa-c.net/index.php/events/item/117-jeannouvel-kontekstualna-arhitektura.html
205
1 2
:
. .
.
.
: ,
, , , , Email:
nebojsa.popovic@jcerni.co.rs
207
1
. 50 km
.
, 30
. 1898
1950
, .
2000,
, 1.
,
. 2200 km2 Q = 650 m3/s.
.
,
, ,
.
EPDM .
5 km 100 000,00 m2 , 200 000,00
m2 265 000,00 m3
.
, . Morwell
Inde , `
. ,
.
() , 1947
, .
208
64%
.
. 85%
.
30
. - 1:3 10 200 m
.
600 km2
, , , .
. 20%
120 km2. .
, 480 km2
.
50 .
,
.
1
Tamnava
Tu
RADLJEVO
b
Pljo
a
tanic
KALENI
MALI BORAK
S tu
ble
nica
K la
d ni
ca
ri ja
D. po
UB
3'
VELIKI CRLJENI
tok
.p
ar-
a-B
rug
d
gra
eo
1
2
3
3'
4
5
6
7
"TAMNAVA - Z. POLJE"
"TAMNAVA - I. POLJE"
POLJE "V.CRLJENI"
POLJE "CVETOVAC"
"TAMNAVA - J. POLJE"
POLJE "D"
POLJE "B"
POLJE "E"
Sko balj
K la
VREOCI
ca
d ni
iina
Vran
Krl ja
ica
ODLAGALITE JALOVINE
av
REKULTIVISANE POVRINE
7
Luk
Kolubara
na
nii
V ra
n
Peta
jezero
Paljuvi
-Vi
OPI
LAZAREVAC
POVRINSKI KOP
RUDOVCI
LAJKOVAC
209
2
. .
.
.
. ,
, .
, 2007
. 3
,
( Google Earth, Lazarevac, Central
Serbia)
. 2
.
:
1. 200 m
, ,
.
2. ,
,
.
3.
.
4. ,
.
5.
.
6.
,
, , ,
, .
210
7.
.
8.
.
,
I
,
2001 2006 .
3 .
3
I, II III
3
:
I ()
.
II ()
.
III
()
211
I
.
( ) .
,
.
/.
I
,
, , , ,
.
.
.
, .
.
, (
),
.
5 km I .
.
'' '' 120 000,00 m2.
.
.
,
1 m 84 mnm.
,
. 2.5H:1.0V EPDM
212
300<D<500.
4 / EPDM 84
mnm.
4
5 - 1
I , ,
. 1
213
,
.
, 300<D<500 mm.
. 5 1.
2
. EPDM
1,0 mm, .
,
. 100 m
. 6
.
6 2
(a) - 2
3
. 1,2 m
1,3 m
.
214
(b) .
(c) .
,
.
,
,
.
.
.
:
:1,65 kN/m
: K < 10-07 cm/s
: Cu > 9
: < 6 %
: d 1,2 m
/
. , ,
:
.
215
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
:
(High Density Polyethylene) HDPE 1,5 mm
PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) 1,0 mm
(Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer) EPDM 1,0 mm
EPDM
.
I
I )
, ) ,
:
7
.
.
,
.
.
216
.
.
h=1,0 m,
,
.
,
.
, ,
(soil flow)
.
,
. . 9
.
9
217
.
( )
()
, ,
. 12 ,
.
.
,
.
. , 8
,
. 10
.
10
218
3
,
. ,
.
11 (km 0+000)
(a)
(b)
2014 Q > 950 m3/s
, - 1,3 m
, ( EPDM) .
,
, .
, USA . 343 .
11 12 2010 2014
.
219
(a)
(b)
, ,
, ,
.
,
,
.
,
. 80
.
,
, ()
, .
, ,
,
.
.
220
13
. 1 2 : 1)
, 2) - 2008 ( ), 3)
- 2008 ( ), 4) 2008
5) 2010..
2010., :
, ,
. 0,35 m,
0,95 m .13.
, .
0,37 m, 0,74 m
.20.
.
( ) 0,82 m,
1,45 m .36.
0,27 m, 67, - 0,52 m.
( 2008.)
2010 , 0,14 m.
0,04 m.
221
( )
a. crossisectionl: no.17
90.50
90.00
90.00
89.50
89.50
89.00
89.00
88.50
88.50
88.00
88.00
87.50
87.00
87.00
Z (mnm)
Z (mnm)
87.50
86.50
86.00
86.50
86.00
85.50
85.50
85.00
85.00
84.50
84.50
84.00
84.00
83.50
83.50
83.00
83.00
-40.00
-20.00
82.50
0.00
20.00
40.00
L (m)
Recorded may 2008
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
-40.00
-20.00
82.50
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
L (m)
Recorded september 2008
:
,
. ()
. 2,0 m,
, .
1,3 m ( ),
.
.
.
. .
,
(
, ).
.
(
) .
.
222
New Kolubara river bed - I phase
Z (mnm)
500.00
1000.00
1500.00
2000.00
2500.00
L (m)
Recorded july 2008
3000.00
3500.00
4000.00
4500.00
5000.00
4
: I ; : , ;
: , ;
: , ;
: - , ;
: Trelleborg Building Systems AB, Rubber, Membranes Division,
Varnamo, Sweden;
: Neshvyl Ltd, ;
: CIP, Be.
223
1, 2, 3
( ,
)
:
(
), ,
650 ha .
220 m,
. ,
1.000, .
,
.
: , ,
, . . ., , mile.bozic@jcerni.co.rs
, . . . ., , dejan.milsev@jcerni.co.rs
3
. . ., , milorad.stojadinovic@jcerni.co.rs
2
225
1
,
, .
,
20.000 .
, 30 km
( 1).
1 -
,
1.000 ha ,
1.000 ha . , , ,
, , .
,
,
.
, .
.
(
0,5 ha, 3 ha),
. ,
-.
, ,
27, 33 54 km .
226
,
, , 355 mm .
, 1988. - 2007. .
3,9 5,6 mm/.
, ,
4 : , , , 89 %
.
.
.
,
.
77 mm ,
, 10 % , 4 mm.
, ,
.
. ,
( ),
. ,
,
.
2
,
( 2). 0,24 m3/s,
650 ha.
2 -
227
2.1
, 1600 mm.
.
45
. 27 m ,
.
20- ,
.
-
12 12 m, 72 m ..
65,5 m ..
,
.
, ,
( 3).
.
3 - 67 m ..
- - ,
. 250 kW,
1.000 kW.
.
.
228
2.2
500 mm,
7.050 m. , ,
,
. ,
22 bar,
R-100 ( - ),
.
, .
,
. ,
.
2.3
- , 4.500 m3,
, 76 m2,
( 4).
.
4 - 286 m ..
285 m ..
286 290 m ..
3
,
,
229
.
,
- .
.
,
.
. ,
. ,
.
,
.
,
.
, .
,
.
,
( 5).
5 -
, .
6 ,
230
.
,
. ,
,
.
4
. ,
, , .
.
(, ,
, ) ,
.
,
.
,
,
. .
220.000 .
, 340 /ha/
650 ha, 1.000 /ha/
( 220 ha).
.
( ),
, ,
( ),
, , .
: ,
. 69 %
2,24 GWh .
650 ha ,
, .
650 ha,
70 % 30 %. 220 ha,
85 % 15 %.
( 4 . ), .
231
650 ha,
1,9 . m3 , 0,17 (530 /ha).
, 0,34 (1.100 /ha).
5
, ,
, ,
650 ha .
, 2012. .
.
,
.
, .
.
530 /ha/ ,
. ,
,
. , ,
, 1.000 /ha/
.
,
,
, .
, .
,
.
/ // 2010. ., .
/
// 2011. ., .
/
// 2014. ., .
232
:
,
,
,
. ,
.
,
.
: konvencijalno odlagalite, bioreaktorsko odlagalite, deponijski
plin.
POSSIBILITIES
DISPOSAL IN
SYSTEM
OF
APPLICATION
MUNICIPAL WASTE
BIOREACTOR
MANAGEMENT
Summary:
Unlike the conventional or passive municipal waste landfill, the alternative approach
the bioreactor landfill introduces active management of landfilled waste in order
to accelerate waste biodegradation, to decrease its toxicity and to reduce the time
required to reach a stable and condition. This paper describes the basic concept of a
bioreactor landfill, stating the advantages and disadvantages of the described
disposal technology. With American and European experiences, lists the
recommendations for Waste Management Strategy of the Republic of Srpska
regarding the application of bioreactor landfills as part of an integrated waste
management system.
Keywords: conventionally landfill, bioreactor landfill, landfill gas.
1 . , ,
233
1.
.
(). () ,
. :
, ,
,
40% ,
[1].
40 .
.
75 .
2003.
Acceptance Criteria[2].
, B2, .
. .
.
- ()
.
()
.
. : , . ( 20%
45-60%), (
). () : ,
, , ,
, , .
-
.
2.-
(, )
- . - ,
,
[3].
1. -
.
,
, , .
234
: , , , ,
, .: ,
.
- :
-
,
-
,
- ,
- , ,
,
,
- ,
,
- 40%.
5 5 5
1-
235
.
,
.
,
.
.
,
(.
) .
3.
. [4]:
/ -
()
10-15%. 2540%. ,
( 20%), ( 20%)
- ( 20%).
/ -
.
( ).
/ -
( )
, .
,
.
3.1
20-35%.
.
, ,
.
(
).
236
3.1.1 -
250.000
. : 97.000
(), 35.000 , 92.000
( 7.000 ).
,
, , , , , .
54oC 12%.
2700 m3. 18
60% ( 2.).
250.000 /
42%
40%
/
15%
Fe+
3%
2-
1000 m3/h
2123 m3. 40 m3/t
. .
,
. -
( ). ,
, ( 3.)[5].
237
3- .
3.1.2
. :
, pH , .
.
.
3.2
.
,
.
.
3.2.1
, .
10% .
12%.
.
.
( 4.).
238
4-
3.2.2
.
() ( 10%)
. ,
(
pH 67).
- ,
( 5.).
.
100 g HPK/l
.
.
,
.
.
239
5-
4.
,
,
: , ,
,
.
.
-,
. ,
.
1 /./,
,2009,345-353.
[2] Acceptance Criteria /Concil Decision 2003/33/EC/Official Journal of the European
Communities, 2003.
[3] /./ ,2004.
[4] Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage and organic fraction of municipal solid
wastes/P.Sosnowski,A.Wieczorek/Advances in Enviromental Researck,2004,609-616.
[5] /.,./ ,
2011,138-142.
240
1, 2, 3, 4
:
, .
,
,
.
,
.
: , , , ,
. . , , djukanoviclollyc@hotmail.com,
. . , , sjankovic671@gmail.com,
3
. . , , teodoravukic91@gmail.com
4
, , sasha91bor@gmail.com,
2
241
1
.
, -
. , ,
600. ... 5.
6 ,
7 1938. .
:
,
, , ,
.
, .
( 25 /2),
. .
: ;
, , ;
8;
;
, .; ,
;
...
,
, 9.
, .
.
- ( )
. , 90 , .
6
7
Stanley Hart White , 1922. 1959.
8
Heat - island effect ,
.
.
9
Patrick Blanc , .
242
2
2.1
.
,
.
, .
, ,
.
4 12 ,
500 . ,
. ,
, 1015, 12
353 . , 1220
12 .
2.2
.
0,5 .
. :
, ,
, 60,
25. 80. ,
, . ,
.
, .
2.3 ,
,
. ,
. ,
,
. , ,
50% , .
, .
.
243
2.4
.
. 5
2,9 W/2,
. ,
.
,
, ,
.
, ,
.
2.5
, :
, , ,
, .
. ,
, ,
.
.
.
5.
3 O
3.1
: ,
/ , ,
, .
. :
- , .
.
.
- , , , .
,
. ,
.
244
3.2.
3.2.1
.
,
.
( ).
.
.
,
.
,
.
, , .
,
. ,
, ,
, , ,
.
3.2.2
.
,
5 ,
, .
.
,
,
.
, ,
.
, .
8
.
245
3.2.3
,
, .
10 15 ,
.
, ,
.
, .
. ,
, . ,
,
, , ,
, .
,
.
4
. , ,
, .
,
, , ,
.
,
. . ,
, ,
, ,
, . ,
.
, ,
. , ,
.
.
, , -
, .
(
-
).
246
5
,
.
.
,
.
40%
, , ,
.
,
. ,
,
, ,
.
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
,
. , ,
.
,
.
,
.
, ,
.
.
,
, , ,
.
247
1
[2]
[3]
[4]
Architecture and the environment: bioclimatic building design /D. Jones, J. Hudson, A.
Tadao // Laurence King, 1998., London
/ M. //
, 1991.,
: / M.
, M. , M. // , 1994.,
, / .
// , 2009.,
[5]
[6]
/ . // , 2008.,
/ . //
, (2012, ), 02, 140 147
[7]
/ A. // , (2012,
), 04, 140 143
Green architecture / J. Wines // Taschen, 2008., Kln
[8]
248
:
, ( ),
, ,
, , .
, , ,
. ,
, , . ,
, - ,
,
, , .
: ,
..., , ,
, 11000 II 61,
email: v.vujanic944@gmail.com
1
249
1.
( ),
. ,
, , (), ,
, ,
, , .
, , , .
, ,
, , .
, ,
,
, , , ,
, , , , ..
( ), 2014..
,
( 2000, : , ,
),
. ,
, ,
, .
, ,
, .
, , (
, ) (
, , , , , )
. , , .
: , ,
. ,
, (1941/2, 1951,1963.). 2005. 2006. ,
, , ,
.
( ) ,
, ,
, .
() ,
, , .
, .
?
.
, ,
( , , , ),
, .
(),
, .
, .
, ( , 1).
.
.
250
: 1) , 2) - , 3)
- , 4)
1.
,
( ), , .
, .
.
2.
, ,
( ), ,
( ).
, . ,
, , , .
,
() , ,
.
, , ,
( ,
), ,
.
, .
, ,
. ,
. (
),
( , ,
, ).
, ,
, , .
,
(1>2>3), ( . , . , . ),
: , ,
.
,
(, , .),
, , .
251
3.
, , ,
,
, , ( 2).
2. ()
(a, b i c) , ; (d i e)
;
, , .
,
, ( 3).
.
,
( - !).
, (
) ,
(CaCO2), , ,
, (paleosoil !).
, , 15 m
(weathering zone) ( 4),
(ice lenses), (solifluction).
( ), ,
, ,
, .
252
3. ( )
4.
, , (reactivated)
(quiscent !) . ,
,
, , - ,
(neotektonika !).
, , ,
( ),
, , :
, , , ,
, ,
, , , , ,
(, , , ) , , ,
.
253
B i H
HRV ATS KA
5 : ) ;
) (, )
254
, , ,
( 50% , ),
, (
),
() , , . ,
( 2014..),
, .,
( , ,
.). , , ,
, , ( ) ,
. , "
, 20 25% ,
, ,
(. 2 5%) (.
). ,
, , ( ) .
, 5 ( ), ()
.
, () ,
,
.
, ,
, , .
(, , ), .
, . :
3.1.
:
1. ( ,
),
(, ,
.);
2. (
, , ),
(, .);
3.
, ;
4. , ,
,
, , .;
5. (, , .)
6. (, , .).
:
255
1.
, , ,
;
2. ( ,
, ),
, .;
3. (, .),
( ,
, ) , .;
4. ,
.
,
,
.
. ,
, , . , ,
, ,
.
, .
, .
, :
3.2.
:
1. ( ,
, ),
();
2. (
, , );
3.
( ), :
, ;
,
, ;
, ;
,
;
4.
,
;
5. , ;
6.
(, , .).
:
1.
, :
256
( );
(
);
( );
(
);
(, .);
2. ( ,
, ),
:
,
, .;
;
3. (
),
;
4. ,
, , ,
, .;
5. : ,
, .
. ,
,
. , ,
, . ,
,
. (
) .
, .
4.
, , ,
, , ,
. , ( ) ,
, ,
. , , ,
, , , .
, , , :
1. , (
),
( );
2. ( ), : , ,
(), , , , ,
, .
3 : (),
(), (), 6.
257
3. , ,
( ).
b
6. (a, b i c)
, , , ,
( ) ( ),
, , ,
( ), , (,
, ), , ,
, ()
( , ,
).
, (),
, , .
5.
()
,
, . , :
- ( ),
- ,
- .
, : ,
; .
, - , , ,
.
, (/cm) ,
.
, ,
. , () ,
(), .
, , ,
, :
,
- , .
, , ,
, .
258
,
, ()
.
, .
.
,
, .
, ,
,
( , , , ),
.
6.
, , ,
.
, (
, , ,
).
, , (
5), ,
,
. ,
, 30 . ,
, .
,
, , ,
, ( ) ,
.
,
,
, .
,
. , :
- ,
- .
, , ,
, .
,
, .
.
, ,
. !
259
,
. ( !),
, , ,
, .
,
, :
, ,
, .
, .
, ,
. ,
, .
, :
- , ;
- ,
;
- , ,
;
- , , .
,
.
, ( ),
.
,
, ;
,
,
. ,
.
1.
260
, : ,
( ).
, ,
( ),
, .
( )
7. : ) (
); )
, ,
( ) ,
( 1),
, . 7. , (: , ,
, .), ,
, ,
. , 30 40.000 ,
5 8 m3 . , (,
, ), , ,
, ,
, , , ,
.
, () , :
- .
, ,
, .
- , .
.
- ,
.
- ,
,
.
.
,
. .
261
,
, .
,
, . : , ,
.
, ,
, .
7.
(, ),
,
- . ,
, :
- , ,
;
- , ,
, , ;
- () ;
- ; , ,
.
, ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
, ( ) .
, ,
, (
) , .
[1] / .,
., .//
, , 1967..
[2] ,
, / ., .// ,
.., , (2000).
[3] / .//,
, 1994.. 1-2.
262
1, 2
,
:
,
.
,
( ), ( ,
) ,
.
: , ,
263
1.
, ,
, .
( ) ,
,
, ,
, ( ) (
, .).
,
, ( , ),
, ,
. ,
: , .
, :
- ;
, ,
- : , .
,
.
: ,
, , ()
, , .
,
.
,
.
.
( ), :
- ( ),
- ,
- ,
- .
1.1.
( ),
,
.
( 1).
264
1.
,
. ( 1,5 2,0 km)
, , : , , ,
, .
:
- ,
- , ,
- .
,
, .
1.2.
,
.
( 5-6 m),
, . ( 2).
2.
265
.
.
, .
, ,
, , ,
, (.3.).
a)
3. : ) ,
) .
() :
- 3-5 m,
- 4 m ,
: 3m,
4 m, .
,
. ,
. , ,
, 4-6.
4 .
266
5 .
6.
1.3.
,
, . ,
,
,
( 7).
,
, ( 7).
267
a)
8. ( a )
, ,
,
. ( 8. ). :
- ,
- , ,
,
- , .
:
- ,
- , ,
, .
. a
, ,
.
1.4.
, (
8 m,
10 m).
268
,
.
9 10,
(),
( 2,5 3,0 m 2 2,5 m ,
).
, .
,
, , .
1,5- 2 m2 ( 1,2 x 1,2 1,4 x 1,4 m ),
.
, . 10 15 m ( 9
10). :
, ,
,
, :
,
.
2.
M
, :
, ,
, ,
.
,
.
, (
), 30 cm .
, ,
, . ,
30 cm ,
.
.
.
, . 1:2
, .
, 100 % ,
.
269
9.
10.
3.
IV
V , . VI V
VII,
.
, ,
( ), .
, .
, ,
.
. ,
30 x 30 x 30 cm.
,
.
270
4.
( ).
4.1.
- ,
, . ,
, .
- ,
, , ,
. ,
.
. ,
.
,
( ) ,
.
,
,
. ,
, . ( 11.).
11.
. 12
.
4.2.
- ,
: ,
.
- ,
''''.
, ,
. ,
.
271
- ,
,
.
- .
.
.
- .
,
, .
12.
, ,
, .
5.
, ,
,
.
1 .. .
2 ( )
, .
3
() .
272
1, 2, 3, 4
:
.
.
.
. ,
.
.
: ,
, , ,
. ... ,
. ... ,
. ... ,
4
. ... ,
2
3
273
1
,
. ,
, , .
,
, .
, .
a
.
,
Winkler [1].
- , .
, . ,
,
. , Winkler-
, a
.
. FilolenkoBorodich [2]
. , Heteny- [3]
, . Pasternak
[4] je ,
, .
.
.
. Terzaghi [5]
. Biot [6]
, .
Winkler- . Vesi [7]
[5] ,
, . Horvath [8]
.
,
. , .
.
.
274
2.
, Winkler-,
q w.
ks
q
w
(1)
Terzaghi [6]
B x B :
B 0.305
k k0
2B
(2)
,
L B
k0 30.5cm
:
k k0
0.305 L 0.152
B
1.5L
(3)
1
:
1
Tble 1 Typical numerical values of modulus of reaction for cohesion soils
K
100-200 kPa
200-400 kPa
>400 kPa
ks -
15-30 MN/m3
30-60 MN/m3
>60 MN/m3
ks -
23 MN/m3
45 MN/m3
90 MN/m3
, Terzaghi-,
B D f :
B 0.305
k k0
2B
(4)
1 2
Df
2
(5)
B
2
. ,
. ,
.
275
2
Tble 2 Typical numerical values of modulus of reaction for cohesionless soils
a
k s - /
5-20 MN/m3
20-90 MN/m3
90-300 MN/m3
k s -
12 MN/m3
40 MN/m3
150 MN/m3
k s -
8 MN/m3
25 MN/m3
100 MN/m3
1 k0 (
30.5cm), Terzaghi-.
1- 30.5cm [9]
Figure 1- Approximate values of modulus of reaction for plate with 30.5 cm [9]
,
Winkler- , Vesi [7] :
k
0.65Es
B 1 2s
12
Es B 4
0.65Es
L
10 k
,
Eb I
B
B 1 2s
:
Es - ,
Eb -
276
(6)
s - ,
I -
3.
.
.
, ,
-2,80 -3,80.
50cm. 2 , 3
.
2
Figure 2 3D construction model
277
2 -
3 -
Figure 3 Ground floor of the construction
4a
2D,
. 4
2C ,
. Winkler- .
a)
278
4
Figure 4 Subsidence foundation in function of modulus of reaction
5 2-C
,
. 5 2-C
,
.
)
279
5
Figure 5 Bending moments of the frame in function of modulus of reaction
4.
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Die Lehre Von Elasticitaet Und Festigkeit / E. Winkler, H. Dominicus // 1867., Prague
Some approximate theories of the elastic foundation / . Filonenko, M. Borodich //
Uchenyie Zapiski Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennoho Universiteta Mekhanica, 1940., 46,
pp. 3-18 (in Russian).
Beams of Elastic Foundations / M. Heteny // University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor,
MI, 1946.
On a new method of analysis of an elastic foundation by means of two foundation
constants / P. L. Pasternak // Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstro liberaturi po stroitelsvui
arkhitekture, 1954., Moscow (in Russian)
Evaluation of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction / K. Terzaghi // Geotechnique, 1955.,
Vol. 4, pp. 297-326
Bending of an infinite beam on an elastic foundation / M. A. Biot // Journal of Applied
mechanics, 1937., pp. A1-A7
Bending of Beams Resting on Isotropic Elastic solid / A.S. Vesi // Journal of
Engineering mechanics division, ASCE, 1961., 87, EM2, pp. 35-53
Modulus of Subgrade reaction: New perspective /J. S. Horvath // Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering 109 (12), ASCE, 1937., pp. 1591-1596
/ . // ,
, 2012.
280
1, 2, 3,
4
:
,
,
.
,
.
.
.
: , , ,
,
. ... ,
. ... ,
3
. ... ,
4
. ... ,
2
281
1.
,
.
, .
.
, .
. ,
. , ,
:
(Hooko- ) (Newton- ).
.
. Maxwell- Kelvin-Voigt-
,
, . Burgers- .
[1].
, ,
.
,
[2].
,
() .
:
) - ,
) - .
, .
, , .
, ,
.
2.
.
1 ,
.
282
[3,6]:
1. = 0
PASCAL-
2. = 2GE HOOKE-
3. T =2 E
4. T= c0
NEWTON-
St. VENANT- (- )
1. [6]
Table 1. Models of ideal basic material [6]
,
:
5. = 2GE * 2 E
6.
KELVIN-
T = 2 E -tR T
MAXWEL-
7.
T = 2 E * c0
BINGHAM- ( )
8.
T = 2GE*2 E *tR T
POYNTING-THOMSON
9.
T = 2GE*2 E *c
--
PRANDTL-REUSS
283
3.
:
-
-
,
.
[4].
.
Kelvina ( 1).
-
, .
. Maksvel- ( 1).
)
2. - [6]
Figure 2. Model extended elastic - model marl [6]
284
.
, , 10
.
. 10 ,
20 .
.
4.
, ( ),
(
, ),
,
.
4.1
.
Coulomb-Mohr-
[7,8]. ,
Cusl dozv C.
(
)
, ,
.
,
. - ,
,
. (
)
Laplace- . ,
,
:
D (t ) D0 (1 e t )[ D D0 ]
(1)
: D(t) - "t"
D0=D(0), = 1
285
D=D(), = 12 / (1+2)
- (1/t)
-
-
t = T (
- )
D = D(T), :
S(T) = S0
(2)
S0 -
( t >T ) :
D'(t)=D(t)
(3)
H(t)
D(T),
H (t ) ( D D0 )(e T e t )
(4)
H ( ) ( D D0 ) e T
(5)
: H
H ()
,
H ( )
D
(1 0 ) e T
D
D
(6)
,
:
S()=S0(1-)
(7)
:
p
(8)
S0
4.2
( 2).
:
p (1
E1
) p
E1 u u
E2
E2
(9)
:
p -
286
u -
-
p -
u -
, :
p0 (1
E1
) E1 u u
E2
(10)
:
u u
p0
const
E
(11)
:
1
1
1
;
E E1 E2
E1 E2
E1 E2
(12)
:
1
u p0 (1 e t )
E2 E1
(13)
. t = T ,
,
. t = T :
1
u uT p0 (1 e T )
E2 E1
(14)
:
p (1
E1
) p
E1 uT const
E2
E2
(15)
p p E uT
(16)
:
287
E1 E2
p0
E1 E2 (1 e T ) 1 e ( t T ) p0 e (t T )
E1 E2
(17)
t :
p0
E1 E2 (1 e T )
E1 E2
(18)
.
:
p p0
1 (1 e T )
1
(19)
,
pR p0 p p0
e T
1
(20)
(20) :
pR p0
(21)
[9]. ,
: 0.1 (1/), po= 560 kN/m2 .
3.
Figure 3. Distribution of pressures over time
""
3.
pR 2 3 .
288
5.
,
.
, ,
.
.
:
, ,
,
, (
).
6.
[1] An Analytical Solution for Axisymmetric Tunnel Problems in Elasto-Viscoplastic Media
/P.Fritz //, Int.J.for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol.8, 1884,
pp.325-342
[2] Modeling of viscoelastic materials /V. Effinger, P.D.Bois // Dyna, 2012.
[3] Engineering viscoelasticity / D.Roylance // 2001.,Cambridge
[4] Introduction to the finite element method a numerical method for engineering analysis
/C.Desai, J.Abel // London, 1972.
[5] Application of finite element and constitutive models /C.Desai // Tucson, 2012.
[6]
/ . // D ,
, ,1980.
[7] A study on Deformation of Eunnels Excavation in Fractured Rocks /A,R. Khoshboresh //
Quebec, 2013.
[8] Time-Dependent Damage investigation of Rock Mass in an In Situ Experimental Tunnel
/Q. Jiang, J. Cui and J. Chen // Materials, 2012., No 5, 1389-1403.
[9] / .
// , , ,
, 02, 1987., , . 117-126
: "
, 22-26 ( 36028 36043)"
289
1, 2, 3, 4
:
,
.
.
,
.
.
: , ,
. , ..., ,milantri@eunet.rs
, ..., ,tmilutinovic@het.ba
, ..., ... , 1, 19320
,zarko.nestorovic@djerdap.rs
4
, mast..., , , ,gpejicic@gmail.com
2
3
291
1.
,
- .
( )
.
.
- ,
.
.
(
, ).
.
.
:
- ;
- ;
-
;
- ;
- .
.
.
.
292
8 12 .
2.
.
,
.
.
[1].
(, ),
. ,
,
,
.
( ).
.
.
[2].
3.
.
.
[1].
.
.
293
.
[2]
.
.
:
-
[3]
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
( )
294
.
.
.
.
.
[2].
. [4] :
, data snooping, Pope- Tau .
4.
.
.
8 12 . 1
8 2
12 .
.
.
.
295
.1. 8
.2. 12
[cm].
1
( 8 12 ). 1
2
296
1
1. 2
20%
.
1.
1
min
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.09
0.06
max
0.98
0.98
1.01
0.45
0.81
0.81
0.82
0.32
sred
0.18
0.18
0.16
0.08
0.19
0.19
0.20
0.10
2.
1
min
0.0004
0.0263
0.0053
0.1104
max
0.9737
0.9996
0.8896
0.9947
sred
0.3598
0.6402
0.3455
0.6545
.
.
(
).
.
.
.
.
.
[5]
297
.
.
5.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
, ,
.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
, ., , ..: ,
, , 1994
, .: .
, , , 1989
, .: , ,
, , 1989
Caspary, F.W.: Concepts of Network and Deformation Analysis, Monograph 11,
School of Surveying, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, N.S.W.,
Australia
Perovi, G.: Least Squares, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Civil Engineering,
Belgrade, 2005
298
1, 2, 3
,
,
:
: ,
,
.
, :
. , ,
j ''''
.
: , , , ,
, , .
. .., ''''
.., .., , 30,, zanesahandzar@yahoo.com
.., . ., .
299
1.
, .
. (constructions works)
.[1]
,
,
.
.
,
,
.
, , .
, . [2]
: , , ,
. ,
( 1).
1 - ,
Figure 1 - The railway standard socio-political community, the backbone of the prosperity of
state capital
300
2.
.
,
.
:
,
[3]
,
.
.
. [3]
.
.
, .
, .
j , 70%
,
, k
. [4]
,
.
.
. ,
( 2).
2
Figure 2 - Offer and demand of actors construction
301
3.
.
,
, .
.
. ,
( 3).
3
Figure 2 - Contracting values
.
,
( 4).
: 1 15.
1 ,
2 ( ) ,
3 ,
4 ,
5 ( ),
6 ,
7 ,
8 ,
9 ,
302
10 ,
11 ,
12 ,
13 ,
14 ,
15 , .
4
Figure 4 - The coordination of the construction site system
4.
.
j,
.
, .
j , .
303
.
( 5).
,
( 6).
5
Figure 5 - Cranes in the service of the works in front of the dam
6
Figure 6 - Hydrotechnical works on accumulation lake
/
, ( 7,8).
304
7
Figure 7 - Excavation using the appropriate machinery
5.
305
. ,
.
!
,
.
. .
:
[1] ,
, ,
/ .//, ,
, 1999.
[2] , /. //, , , ,
2002./2003.
[3] , /. //, , , ,
2002./2003.
[4] , /. //,
, , 2010.
:
[I]
, /. //, , ,
1981.
[II] , /. //, , ,
1995.
[III] 1., /. //,
, , e o, ,
1985.
[IV] , /. //,
, , 2004.
[V] , /. //,
, , 2003.
[VI]
, ... . , /. //,
, , 2008.
306
1 , 2, 3
ASSET MENAGEMENT-
:
. Asset menagement-
-,
.
- , ,
, , ,
. .
: , ,
, . . , ..
. . , ..
3
. . , ..
2
307
1.
() asset menagement (AM)
. Asset management . . -
, .
: ,
, - , ,
.
: , ,
, .
asset menagement-
, .
. 1 -
.
. ,
.
:
308
,
.
.
:
asset menagementa-
,
, .
.
.
, .
.
.
.
,
.
309
2.
..
(DWP-a)
.. 2013.
. Asset menagement
(Danube water programme),
.
World bank ( ) IAWD- International Association
of Water Supply Companies in the Danube River Catchment Area (
) , .
, ,
, . ..
.
,
.
, ..
.
. Hidro-copm
..
. ,
.
3.
- - ..
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
.
.
.
,
. .
,
,
.
1999/2000.. .
,
310
. Auto Cadu -
. 2007.
-GIS
PROTOK. GIS .
, .
,
( ,
).
.
.2 ,
311
3.
4.
- , AutoCad
.5 GIS
312
.. -GIS
.
.
,
.
.
, ,
.
(DWP-a)
.. 2014.
, .
,
.
,
.
, (),
,
, , .
- ..
.
.
, ( )
.
,
. ,
.
. ,
.
313
( ).
-
,
, /,
( )
.
. ,
, 1950-, 1960- 1970-
.
. ,
.
, ,
.
:
- , ,
- -
- -
- .
.
, , asset management- ,
.
(1) Asset management: A guide for water and wastewater systems; Environmental financ
centar, New Mexico
(2) Infrastructure Asset Management of Urban Water Systems, Helena Alegre, National
Civil Engineering Laboratory, Lisbon, Portugal
(3) ..
314
Miroslav Malinovi1
:
:
, ,
, , .
,
, , ,
, ,
.
: , ,
MSc M , . . . , , o- . , ,
. mmalinovic@agfbl.org
315
1 INTRODUCTION
This work does not tend to give supportive or negative comments on the architecture which
is in its focus; on contrary, it is supposed to give thorough overview of the contemporary
architectural ideas produced by some of the leading local architects, some in-depth information
about interesting details, and besides others, provide the closer look to the projects in general.
The history of the Franciscan Province Bosna Argentina and the sites concerned in this paper is
far more complicated than the provided volume of this work, reaching all the way to the
Middle Ages and the earliest historical facts of the Bosnian region. Therefore, it is important to
mention that this work obviously does not comprise these information, but knowledge about
that exciting and interesting data is a good prerequisite for understanding some basic ideas in
the architectural tradition and principles in the Province. Nevertheless, it does not make this
work any less valuable, it is to contribute to the whole idea of importance of this topic.
The selection of the projects is the matter of direct choice, as these three here presented and
depicted, are actually the largest and the most important construction sites out of all 19
convents locations in Bosna Argentina. Truth to be said, there are other active sites, like
Provincial Headquarters in Kovaii, Sarajevo, convent and parish church in Jajce, convent in
Gua Gora etc, but those do not offer as much representative and valuable data as these three in
Sesvetska Sopnica, Plehan, and Petrievac.
The work will not deal with the theoretical approaches of the architects, nor it will discuss
about some common topics like the actual need for such undertakings, financial aspects of the
projects etc, it will only open the most important questions for further discussions and try to
reach the real importance of these projects in the light of contemporary architecture in the
Provincial, and general sacred European levels, providing the original contribution of this
paper to the discussions about the sacred architecture in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
316
Sreko Kreitmayer. It announced the ultimate moving of the Convent of Saint Elias from
Podsused to Sesvete, which happened recently.
The project for the new complex comprises a number of functions and facilities, organized
together to make one of a kind centre, probably unique in the region. It could be, however,
compared to the new project for a multi-purpose centre in Plehan.
Architect Sreko Kreitmayer is the author of the final project, which is dated in 1999, and
followed with a comprising textual document depicting the authors ideas on the general theory
of sacred facilities in the contemporary era, as well as its reflections to the approach to this
certain project. [1]
Kreitmayer, according to his words, tried to reproduce the scenes from the historical
models, and reinvent them in the contemporary context, using the present structures, instead of
the already known visual symbols creating the unique sacred space. One of the ideas was to
maintain the relationship between the sacred and public space, which is recently brought to the
discussions in the context of changed life terms and human needs.
The complex consists of the parish church and the 2-winged convent, linked with the parish
house. The church is oriented southeast-northwest, with the entrance on the southeastern side,
and the altar on the northwestern side. On its southern side, the semidetached bell tower is set,
as well as the chapel, laid on the ground floor level. The eastern side of the church holds the
link to the parish house, which connects two wings of the convent, and all together outline two
inner courtyards.
The church is conceived as an irregular, leaning, truncated cone, built over the egg-shaped
base, and erected in the outlines of the historical human shelter tent. The truncation on the
top provides not only the natural light, but the direct link to the heavenly heights, symbolizing
overwhelming motive of the direct link of the congregation with the God. As Kreitmayer says,
the glass dome on the top of the cone represents the non-materialistic crown of the building and
the human movement towards the spiritual. The inner shell is perforated: in the altar zone the
perforations are on the decorative level, growing to the huge structural openings towards the
chapel, entrance galleries, and the parish house surrounding the main nave. Other light
sources, important to comprehend the idea, are set behind the altar. At the height of the human
eyes, directly behind the priest, the altar zone is discretely closed with the stained glass
windows, allowing the diffused lightening, and still providing the link between the outer and
inner space. In the vertical axis of the altar, the outer shell of the cone is dramatically cut with
huge vertical opening. In the altar zone, just below the opening, The Crucifixion is set.
According to the initial project, the altar should have held additional stained glass windows,
standing in front of the faade wall, and flank the direct light and the view towards the outer
space, instead of the stained glass windows set directly on the faade. Besides those details,
some others are also interesting, like one of a kind, horse shoe-shaped platform, allowing the
insight view of the interior and the altar from completely reinvented positions. The overall
impression of light and simple space inside is supported with discrete shades of white and grey
colour, delivering the initial architects idea.
The church, with the semidetached bell tower, is the central figure in the project. The bell
tower raises prominently in the surrounding landscape of post-war violently urbanized
neighbourhood, defining probably the least regular line within the context. In the corner
between the tower and the church, there is the chapel, with the similar treatment of the interior
light and the impression of a link between the interior and the exterior space. The entrance to
the very church is done over the transparent vestibule, actually the ciborium, reflecting the
317
initial architects idea of returning to the early Christian roots. The whole ensemble is a bit
elevated from the immediate surrounding allowing a more prominent position and adequate
viewing of the site, from the perspective of the visitor. The church is materialized with the
sheets of stainless steel, supporting the virtual scenario of the only shining star in the skyline.
The south-western side of the complex is outlined with the linear water ditch with the
installations of the Via Crucis, shimmering above the water, with the Cross as the final
element, set in the extended position of the ditch, and visible from the church, through the altar
openings. On the western side of the Via Crucis, the geometrical garden is designed.
The rest of the complex, the parish house and the convent, is set on the north-eastern side of
the ensemble. The parish house is directly linked to the church, and furthermore represents the
virtual bridge to the convent. Convent comprises two linear wings, which are oriented to the
less public side of the future complex. All buildings have the basement, ground, and two floors
above. The architecture of those buildings is carefully designed not to prevail over the church
and its own visual integrity. Two wings of the convent, are interconnected with smaller
building parts, making two inner courtyards, with similar geometrical structure as the generous
enclosure. Even here, Kreitmayer tried to preserve a certain level of reminiscence to the
historical models of the sacred housing facilities, but in reinvented language and the mutual
position within the overall context.
After the acquisition of the construction site, the works started very soon. The site was
blessed by Archbishop of Zagreb, Cardinal Josip Bozani, on 15th July 2001. As expected, the
construction of such an ensemble is feasible only in stages: by now, the church with the
underground crypt and the side chapel is erected, as well as the parish house, now used also as
the convent. The prominent entrance, ciborium-based idea, also got its shape. The rest of the
building parts, landscape architecture, surrounding roads and parking lots are still to be done.
In the interior of the church, artistic decoration and some detailed projects are still
undergoing. The stained glass window with the motive Annunciation of the Lord was done by
uro Seder, while Mile Blaevi did the sculpture of Saint Anthony of Padua and the bronze
entrance door. Just recently, the inner shell of the church, with a perforated structure, was
installed.
Similarly to other uncompleted pieces of contemporary architecture, here is also quite
difficult to give unbiased thoughts on the non-finished architecture, and its possible reflections
to the initial idea and use. It is, however, one huge idea, made from scratch and designed to be
a complex that will serve not only as a simple Sunday-gathering place, but important
ecumenical meeting point within the regional context. In the perspective of the OFM Bosna
Argentina, this project represents an outstanding legacy for the future generations that are still
to come and enjoy the fruits of the present labour.
From the architectural point of view, this remote site, set on the far western part of the
Province, represents a worthy entrance gate to the Province, and maybe traces the path of the
future design principles in the Province. It is clear that the distance from the Provincial
headquarters, and the completely different context within which the site is being built, is
reflected in the architecture, but that is the only precedent in the era of, some would often say,
repeating and dull theories in the contemporary architecture.
2.2 THE CONVENT AND THE PARISH CHURCH OF SAINT MARC, PLEHAN
The unfortunate stream of historical events in the last civil war in Bosnia heavily influenced
the Convent of Saint Marc. On 2nd July 1992, extremists dynamited the site and totally
318
demolished both the convent and the parish church, which represent an unpreceded event in the
newer Balkans history. This was the most comprehensive destruction of one Franciscan site in
Bosnia during the last civil war. Truth to be said, many others were also demolished, like
convent churches in Jajce or Petrievac, but in Plehan the case was that the whole complex was
destroyed, along with the majority of movable possessions, museum artefacts, artworks,
archive documents etc.
Shortly after the demolition, the architect Zlatko Ugljen was commissioned for the project
for the new complex. In 1993, Ugljen did one of his the foremost projects for OFM Bosna
Argentina. Later, the final project was done by Ugljen himself, and his close associates, Nina
Ugljen-Ademovi and Husejn Dropi, architects that are the co-authors of a number of his
recent projects. The Convent of Saint Marc is temporary situated in the former farm building
northern from the initial complex.
The works on the complex started just in 1998, when Friar Ivan uri set off with the
preparation works on the cleaning of the remains of the old buildings. The foundation stone
was blessed by Pope John Paul II, and laid down on 23rd June 2001 by Archbishop of
Vrhbosna, Cardinal Vinko Pulji.
The complex that was designed in 1993 is still under the construction; precisely on its
beginning. Therefore, that makes it rather complicated to analyse a partly built complex of
extreme importance. The proposed ensemble consists of three built structures: Parish Church,
Convent, and the Cultural Centre, set in a way to outline the central lapidarium designed to be
the multifunctional opened space.
The convent and the cultural centre are virtually spilled over the landscape, following its
shape and maintaining its immediate course making the landscape opening for the church
complex that should dominate the surrounding area. The church comprises several parts. First
one is the opening bell tower, in the form of the campanile, detached from the church, but
linked to it with huge glass-covered narthex. On each of the sides, smaller structures with
functions of administrative zone on the northern, and the chapel on the southern side of the
narthex are designed. These buildings, along with the western church facade will be outlined
with the wall, marking one of a kind inner courtyard as the front scene of the church. The
church is a superstructure with the circular floor plan that transforms to irregular square on its
top base, which is done by cutting southern and western sides of the ground circle or to
present it more precisely: it is the partial intersection between huge cylinder and inscribed
cube. That structural detail, along with suspended square glass openings on the roof, allowed
Ugljen to produce a unique atmosphere inside with the magnificent effects of zenithal
illumination the topic that is represented all over the complex. Furthermore, the inner floor
plan reveals the square base and interesting structural and decorative details of wall design and
roof suspension systems.
Another part of the complex is the convent, situated eastern from the church, linked to it
over the covered porch behind the main altar similar was seen in a demolished complex. The
convent consists of three buildings, which could be seen as independent ensemble, also
outlined by a square wall that should mimic the historical archetype of an inner courtyard of
the cloister. The buildings have variable number of levels, as some of them have different
treatment in the basement but above the ground, they are all pretty much flat and in
accordance to landscape configuration.
319
The cultural centre is, according to project situated on the north of the complex, where
today stands the temporary convent building former farm facility. It is shaped as a huge
cross, extending over the site, comprising the surrounding.
It still remains to see in what this complex will be transformed in the future. By now, only
the chapel and administrative buildings in the front yard are built and partially furnished
according to the project. The church is built and its envelope is completed entirely, as well as
the very basic structural segment of two convent buildings. All the rest, surrounding yard
walls, the third convent building, the cultural centre, the bell tower, as well as the elements of
landscape design are still to be built.
Unfortunately, this Franciscan site in Plehan holds the title of the most demolished site in
the last century in whole OFM Bosna Argentina. If not because of its representative
architecture, then because of all belonging pieces of art, paintwork, sculptures, furnishing, it
certainly represents one of the biggest losses in the recent history of the Province. Truth to be
said, there was nothing that original in the demolished buildings, but their importance on the
local, Bosnian level, made them specific and outstanding for the time being. New complex that
is being built is nevertheless even more magnificent and, some would say, incomparable to the
rest of contemporary architecture in OFM Bosna Argentina. Once it is finished, it will certainly
be the biggest site in the Province, but it is still to wait and comprise all the effects that it is
bringing, in order to properly analyse it and understand its values.
The movable properties belonging to the Franciscan convent of Saint Marc in Plehan are
registered as the permanent national monument of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It consists of:
painting gallery with 395 pictures, sculpture gallery with 35 sculptures, 2 items of holy mass
dishes, and 5 items in archive records. [2]
2.3 THE PARISH CHURCH OF SAINT ANTHONY OF PADUA, PETRIEVAC
The contemporary Parish Church of Saint Anthony of Padua in Petrievac is the fourth
parish church that is being built on this site over the last 3 centuries. First one was built in
1884, and reconstructed in 1893, second one in 1928 according to project done by Misita-Bla
Katui, third one was built after the 1969-earthquake demolitions in 1973-1984 by prominent
Slovenian architects Janez and Danilo Frst. [3, 4, 5, 6]
Finally completed, even this church made it just over a decade. On 7th May 1995,
extremists set explosive devices on the church, bell tower, and convent. The church and the
tower were entirely demolished, along with its belonging objects, art pieces, and liturgical
equipment. Unfortunately, the ruins stood on the very same place until 2003, when on 22nd
June Pope John Paul II visited Banja Luka, beatified Ivan Merz, and gave his blessing to
foundation stone of the future church.
The fourth church in Petrievac is being built according to one of the most prominent living
and Bosnian architects at all, Ivan traus. Project for the new church in Petrievac is currently
last big project done by traus, and after several decades, the first one that he is doing in city
where he grew up.
It is one project of total design, within which traus did design not only for church, but also
for all the details, interior design, furniture, equipment Along with some other new convent
churches in Bosna Argentina that are being built at the moment this represents certainly
masterpiece of the sacred architecture in the Province. Actually, it is a smart project, very well
thought out in the context of earlier churches, historical events, status of the site, and liturgical
question in general.
320
Design preserved some of the details from the last demolished church: position of the two
main entrances on the west, entrances, and the actual crypt, which basically survived the
demolition, as well as the relationship of the sanctuary within the context of the altar and the
rest of the church. In addition to that, two bell towers and connection to the convent with an
appropriate bridge is the reminiscence to the project done by Misita-Katui. [7]
Structural system and chosen material: concrete, are not separated from the general concept
and the idea of creating contemporary sacred mansion that offers same impression both inside
and outside, satisfying the liturgical requests and architects personal ideas. Single, opened
space in floor plan is similarly treated as in the old church, but now on a bit larger scale. Only
six rounded concrete columns are hiding in the space: four of them are holding the enormously
huge arched beams, which are crossing each other just above the sanctuary and holding the
entire complex gabled roof. Behind the sanctuary are the altar and sacristy, concealed behind
the wall; sacristy holds the entrances to the bell towers, which are located on its sides. At the
entrance to the church small chapel, which will probably be devoted to the latest deceased
Pope, Saint John Paul II is located. Some usual parts of the church are missing, like the choir,
but its absence is not noticeable. Via Crucis is proposed to be set on sidewalls, which is still to
be completed. Under the church, old and adapted crypt is also being equipped.
Outside, faades and structural elements have the similar role, very important effect and
contribute to the overall impressions. Rough concrete, now being fine plastered is, besides
glass and sheets of metal tin, the only material used for design. Each and every element is not
used just because of its pure utilitarian role, but to support the design ideas. Some would say
even too trivial, maybe the most important are the cross details, that are repeated all over the
church, especially at the entrance to the church and on the bell towers, restoring the identity of
existence of two bell towers on that very location. Also, surrounding landscape design, with
slopes around the church that are meant to be a path for certain liturgical celebrations, is
another important element of the design.
The overview of the important events in Petrievac in appropriate correspondence with
actual political and social situation in region shows the tumbling flow of the convents
development. Each of the regimes had its significant influence to the course of the history, but
nevertheless Franciscan authorities managed to steer the key points as they were supposed,
making one of a kind ensemble of multi-layered architectural fabric. Besides its extraordinary
architectural values, and outstanding original stylistic characteristics, very important architects
signed the projects, making everything even more impressive and original. Unfortunately, not
all built heritage of the convent is preserved up until nowadays, but remaining parts encourage
us that the Franciscan complex in Petrievac, once completed, will remain standing as one of
the brightest architectural stars in Bosna Argentina.
3 CONCLUSIONS
As it is aforementioned, this paper is not intended to open some of the common discussions
when the history of architecture is concerned, moreover it is not the template version of some
of the works with the historical background in the field of architecture. It is the work with the
aim to present the colourful display of current architecture in the Province, which has been the
role model of well-known stream of valuable architectural goods for last several centuries.
Although the unfortunate events from the last civil war led to the possibilities to build new
321
facilities for the friars and congregation, it is to praise the ability of the Franciscan authorities
how they managed to reach the circumstances to step into projects of this kind.
The more important is the recognition of these projects in terms of some universal values,
reaching beyond the usual sacred or specifically Catholic theories. The multi-purpose
background of two cultural centres depicted here testifies to it. The architects provided some of
the ideas that were not seen before in Bosnia, deleting some of the common borders and
outlines often linked to the strict rules of the sacred design. If one compares the sacred
architecture of Catholic Church in Bosnia in previous eras and these new projects, it can be
easily seen that contemporary projects stepped into something that is part of the outstanding
world architectural practise. Use of new materials, structural concepts, multi-functional usage
opportunities are all properties that are linked to the new projects, and exactly that makes the
new churches and convents more than just a Sunday-gathering place, it puts them in the role of
true public institutions, open to all confessions, places for contemplation and learning, outlined
in the architectural masterpieces.
LITERATURE
[1] Archive collection of architectural bureau STUDIO Kreitmayer, Ljubljana
[2] Privremena lista nacionalnih spomenika. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Commission to
preserve national monuments. 2003-2014. Web. 31 May 2014
[3] Secesijski armiranobetonski mostovi vukovarskog inenjera Frana Funtaka / D.
Damjanovi // Prostor Vol. 11 No 1 (25). 2003, Zagreb, 11-31.
[4] Mari, Franjo and Anto Orlovac. Banjoluka biskupija u rijei i slici od 1881. do 2006:
povodom 125. obljetnice utemeljenja Biskupije. / F. Mari, A. Orlovac // Biskupski Ordinariat
Banja Luka, 2006, Banja Luka, 535.
[5] Blago franjevakih samostana Bosne i Hercegovine: povijest, kultura, umjetnost, turizam,
prirodne znamenitosti. / M. Karamati, A. Niki, M. Njavro, M. Studen // Privredni vjesnik,
1990, Zagreb, 61.
[6] Convent and church projects. Archive of Franciscan convent of the Holy Trinity in
Petrievac, unknown date 1927-1997, Banja Luka
[7] Idejni projekat upne crkve Petrievac. / I. traus // Archive of Franciscan convent of the
Holy Trinity in Petrievac, 2007, Banja Luka
Choice of other, non-cited literature
A History of Architecture on the Comparative Method for the Student, Craftsman, and Amateur
/ B. Fletcher, Banister, B. F. Fletcher // Batsford, 1905, London
A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals / S. Kostof, G. Castillo // Oxford University
Press, 1995, New York
Entwurfsatlas Sakralbau. / R. Stegers, D. Baumann // Birkhuser, 2008, Basel
Europischer Kirchenbau: 1900-1950: Aufbruch zur Moderne. / W. J. Stock, A. Gerhards, H.
Schwebel, K. Kinold // Prestel, 2006, Mnchen
Restart: Arhitektura u Bosni i Hercegovini = Architecture in Bosnia and Herzegovina: 19952010 / H. Ibelings, M. Jadri, I. traus, A. Rusan, S. Risaluddin, S. Kreso // Buybook, 2010,
Sarajevo
322
:
.
, .
,
,
, .
: , ,
, ,tomicbranka@ymail.com,
323
1.
. ,
.
.
. ,
, ,
. , .
,
.
.
.
,
.
.
, .
2.
. 5 :
( , ),
( , ,
( )),
(, ),
(, ),
().
.
. ,
.
.
.
. ,
.
.
.
, ,
324
.
, .
.
:
, ,
, .
, ,
.
. ,
, .
, .
.
.
, .
. ,
, , , ,
.
:
, , , , .
3.
. ,
.
.
.
(. WSN Wireless Senzor Network). WSN
.
:
,
,
,
,
.
:
: ( ), ,
, .
: ,
, ( ).
: (
, ,
325
), (
).
,
.
:
.
/
.
,
,
.
:
, ,
- .
:
, /
, .
WSN ,
, , , ,
. ,
1000 .
,
AD HOC .
AD HOC :
( ,
)
,
,
AD HOC ,
WSN AD HOC .
4.
,
:
, ,
.
326
4.1.
.
, :
, -.
.
.
, .
, 0,5'', .
.
.
.
: - ,
20 GHz, ,
- . -
.
-
.
. , .
, .
3 .
. -
.
4.2.
.
:
,
,
,
,
,
.
:
( .
, ).
,
( ),
( ),
,
327
(
),
.
, . ,
(, ,
, ,
, , )
4.3.
.
: (RS232,
RS485, USB), -ethernet, ( ).
: bluestooth long-range bluettooth, radio
modem.
5.
- ,
.
,
. ,
. (
), ( ) .
.
2: -
3
.
.
130 000 .
328
3:
.
27829,25 m. 3
. (2),
(1) (3).
, .
.
4:
.
.
.
,
.
329
:
2
,
3 ,
1 10 m ,
1 10 m.
(, , ).
,
.
.
.
.
,
.
, -
web .
wireless ,
.
.
.
1
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
/ . // , ,
, 2014.
/ . // , 2014
World Disasters Report / International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent
Societies, 2009
Wireless Sensor Network for Disaster Monitoring / M. Ramesh // Amrita University,
India
Landslide monitoring by using sensor and wireless techniqus / S.Bhardwaj, M.Metha,
Y.Ahmed, M. Chowdhury // International journal of gematics and geosciences, 2014
330
:
-,
.
.
.
. ,
.
: , ,
,
1
PhD student, University of Nis, Faculty of civil engineering and architecture, department architecture/urban planning,
Aleksandra Medvedeva street nr14, 18000 Ni, Serbia, milica.igic989@gmail.com
2
Mitkovi Petar, Full Profesor PhD, Faculty of civil engineering and architecture, department architecture/urban
planning, Aleksandra Medvedeva street nr14, 18000 Ni, Serbia, petar.mitkovic@gaf.ni.ac.rs
3
Bogdanovi-Proti Ivana, Senior assistent Mphl,Faculty of civil engineering and architecture, department
architecture/urban planning, Aleksandra Medvedeva street nr14, 18000 Ni, Serbia, ivana.bogdanovic@gaf.ni.ac
331
1 INTRODUCTION
With development and expansion of cities, industrial areas that were once on the periphery,
slowly coalesce into urban fabric of the city, thus creating a number of problems. First of all
there are negative ecological effects on the surrounding area, primary on the life and work of
people living in the city. Thus, their purpose is not in accordance with the space in which the
facilities are, and in these cases it is necessary to reconstruct these complexes and to convert
them in other functions, and it is possible to do that through the process of urban regeneration.
Urban regeneration or restoration, is a program of re-use and adaptation of land in areas of
moderate to high density of construction. Urban regeneration begins to apply at the end of the
XIX century, especially in developed countries. Intensive urban regeneration begins in mid-last
century, mainly under the concept of reconstruction. Urban regeneration is of great importance
for the urban development of cities. It has a lot of credit for changing the layout structure of
many important cities.
This paper discusses process of urban regeneration of industrial complexes on a specific
examples from different countries. As an examples are chosen Emscher Park in Germany,
French Parc La Villette and High Line park in USA. Further study will explain more detailed
the process regeneration, the situation before and after the intervention, and other facts relevant
to the new parks.
The aim of this paper is to show a specific example of a method of urban regeneration by
considering these parks as good examples. Analyzing these examples in the paper will be
pointed out that it is possible to perform good conversion without disturbing the surrounding
area. In addition, aim was also to point out the importance of these project, especially in
understanding the new concept of the parks of the 21st century.
The methods that are used in this paper are: analysis of the data collected, description of the
former and present state, case studies - a broader analysis of specific examples and synthesis making conclusions based on the facts previously analyzed.
2.
Industrial area where it is today Emscher Park was founded in the XIX century for the
purpose of manufacturing of surrounding plants and mines. In that period Ruhr area was
converted into the area with the largest number of built industrial complexes in Central Europe,
with the expected highest level of environmental pollution. These complex worked until last 30
years when because of the restructuring entire complex stopped working and this devastated
area left as ruin to decay. Contamination of air and land is one of the major difficulties for the
process of the regeneration of an industrial area. The solution to this problem occurred in May
1989, when the government of the German made a decision to convert this area into the "park".
River Emscher is the centerpiece of the park and the bearer of the entire project of
regeneration. Park was formed from the industrial areas, and during the process of regeneration
it has been refined with beautiful landscapes, dozens of bridges and flexible, adaptive and
functional objects that are result from the former factory. Natural boundaries of this area are
the rivers Ruhr to the south, and the Emscher River on the north side. The location has an area
of about 800 square kilometers and includes 80 individual projects in 17 different cities
(Duisburg, Oberhausen, Mlheim, Essen, Bochum, Gelsenkirchen, etc.), with a population of
about 2 million inhabitants. Traffic connections are by public transport and a network of local
332
railway lines, and bicycle and pedestrian paths. The infrastructure is such that it allows
operation on the principle of large metropolis, in this case, as the metropolis that is a synthesis
of several small towns. (Figure 1.) 6
Figure 1 Map of the area of Emscher park with main infrastructure objects http://emscherlandschaftsparkblog.de/wp-content/uploads/ELP-Karte-1024x450.jpg
First phase during regeneration of the area was cleaning the river Emscher and main
goal was to change the awareness of the residents for this area. The project included
environmental rehabilitation, preservation and enhancement of industrial heritage and nature
conservation. Because of that it was proposed to create functional contents such as housing,
business, recreation, culture, art, commerce and public green spaces. Solving the problem of
pollution was the starting point in the regeneration, and in general to achieve better sociocultural and economic effects. Environmental remediation of Emscher Park has brought
primarily healthier environment, and set an example of good practice which contributed to the
development of awareness of people in the conservation of nature. Cleaning the river Emscher
and the greening of former industrial site, are some of the measures taken which caused
normalization of biodiversity and the development of new ecosystems in places where it almost
never happened.
Recognition and appreciation of industrial heritage, as part of the history of a city or
region, is one of the most important socio-cultural benefit which is achieved by urban
regeneration process. This way these complexes became more valuable as monuments of past
times which can testify about industrial period that had major influence on development of this
region. On the other hand, looking at the aspect of economic sustainability, the focus was on
the development of restaurants and tourist attractions that have become almost the biggest
sources of revenue. Employing local people during the regeneration of the area, but also during
its operation, it has a major impact on reducing the number of unemployed persons in the
region of Ruhr area. Strengthening of tourism within the preservation of industrial heritage has
led to very significant data that the number of overnight stays increased by 60.6% in the period
from 1990-2009. 5
Referring to the initial hypothesis about the socio-economic sustainable reconstruction
and regeneration of abandoned industrial complex along the Emscher river, the success of this
333
project lies in solving the problems of unemployment and the socialization of different social
groups, with the active participation of local people in the regeneration process. In order to
successfully socialize all social groups in the reconstruction of industrial heritage, it was meant
to fully preserve the spirit -identity of the city, in what was particularly important to protect
and revitalize the architectural buildings and vistas (shafts, cranes, bridges, chimneys. ..).
(Figure 2.)Last but not least important factor is evident and appreciation of new cultural values
and the ability to easily adapt to new social and cultural trends. 7
3.
Park La Villete is located on the edge of Paris main center in the northeastern part of
the city. It is bordered by the Boulevard Priphrique (ring road around Paris) and the suburb
of Seine-Saint-Denis. It is set in the semi-industrial part of town, working-class district, which
borders the suburbs. Park covers an area of 125 hectares. During the XIX century the area of
La Villette is transformed from a small village into a major commercial crossroads of trade,
thanks to the development of canals that surround it. 1860 La Villette has become an integral
part of Paris. This area was popular for its markets, slaughterhouses and ports. This was meat
industry area with market and 5 slaughterhouse and areas for processing meat, where worked
more than 3,000 people. (Figure 3.)
334
Since its completion in 1987, the park has become a popular attraction for residents of
Paris and many tourists. Every year the park is visited by over a million visitors. Park
335
represents a kind of symbiosis of culture and recreation in a very unusual manner characteristic
for architecture of the XX century. This project is very revolutionary for its program in the
world of architecture, and it is important in urban theory of the world because it opened the
way for numerous discussions on the theme of urban regeneration. The idea of conservation of
existing buildings and investing in them as part of a new urban-strategic mechanism has
become a trend in the world in recent years. This example of regeneration process has shown
that the regeneration of inherited form of urban metropolis in the urban areas can be
economically justified and some abandoned or adverse public spaces can get a brand new
unit - form. Park with its design attracted and continues to attract the attention of many critics.
This is the first and very brave step to park is not treated as part of the landscape that is greened
but as an urban form in the heart of the city. The park is divided in units that are fully
determined and dominant and distinctive in their own way and together make up a small
segment of the large continent-city. The city can function without park as well as park cannot
function without city as the architect realized and managed to achieve and to create an invisible
but unbreakable bond between two elementary urban forms. Today the park is the one of good
examples of the XXI century park that was created by converting urban markets in the green
zone. All criteria for recovery from the economic, social, ecological and social aspects are
taken into account as far as possible respected. 2
4.
High line Park is project for regeneration of railway in the urban core of Manhattan
island in New York. High line is an elevated rail structure build in 1930-ies. Its main purpose
was to deliver goods to Manhattan. (Figure 7.) It was working for almost 50 years and when
transportation by truck became more effective - trains lost their significance. Last train that
past this railway was in 1980. After that the railway was abandoned and left ruined (Figure
8.). Since then there were many initiatives for demolishing this site because the site became
mockery and ideal place for gathering of marginal groups and many gangs started to make their
bases in this area. But in the last years of XX century group of activists from nearby
neighborhood started to make campaign for preservation of this industrial infrastructure lane.
Project framework started in 2002. and final design was chosen by the end of 2005 and first
works started in 2006.. First section was opened in 2009., second section was opened in 2011.
and by the end of 2014. third section was opened. 3
336
After many studies, it was obvious that demolishing could only cause huge costs and
pollution not only air but also ground contamination. Many of the buildings would lose their
purpose and this area would became same as many brownfield locations in the city. Thanks to
the very strong will of the friends of the high line this projects was implemented in the way it
was first planned. Main principles during design process were based on preservation of existing
condition and adjustment this infrastructure to all the visitors. Because park is elevated, beside
the stairs there are few elevators so persons with disabilities can visit this park. After opening
the park, many residential blocks were built so that this lane represents addition to their
courtyards. Tiling follows the rails and visitors have feeling like they are going over real green
railway. Along the park there are many benches which have excellent views on the ocean and
there are many widening areas predicted for event organization. Thanks to the big support of
the city and the help of many residents, this project was very quickly developed and in very
short time it became very popular around the world. The only material that was used is wood
and wild greenery and wood tiling creates unique landscape inside the concrete jungle as
New York is called. 9
High line Park is designed as sustainable park and it represents special natural habitat
with very characteristic biodiversity. During the period of non working, this area was
completely abandoned and many wild greenery started growing so designers kept part of it.
Thanks to the structure of railways which is not solid, all of these plants can survive without
special treatment. Entire lane looks like green roof and it is very useful elevated park which
refines high density urban core. 10
5. CONCLUSION
Analyzing examples of three very successfully implemented projects of regeneration
of former industrial sites we can highlight what are advantages and disadvantages of these
processes. First of all, the big problem are legal and property relations and if someone has idea
for regenerating abandoned complex he must have full support of the authorities. That was the
case with High Line because until group of activists didnt get the help from municipality they
couldnt do anything. On the other hand, in Germany there is very high level of awareness for
this problem on the residential but also on the governmental level but even so, some period of
337
time is required until all the evaluations are done. Before any actions are taken, evaluation of
the heritage must be done in order that significant facilities and infrastructure lanes can be
preserved completely. Only in case of La Villete park, existing facilities where poorly saved
because entire park was done according modern principles without considering created state.
But on the other hand, those propositions were made by the government which organized
competition for park design. In all three cases, local residents were actively involved in
regeneration process and they had chance to make suggestions for design. All of these
examples were done years ago and still they represent point of admiration of many planners
and landscape designers. These regeneration processes were comprehensive and all the aspects
of natural environment and industrial heritage were taken into account in order to propose
unique and quality solutions. This way contaminated soil can be regenerated, lack of greenery
can be solved and also many people were involved and unemployment rate was reduced. All
the financial investments were through local budget and many non- governmental funds and all
the projects were done in phases sections depending on the financial situations.
Refining natural landscape has shown as a very good solution for preserving industrial
heritage and promoting eco development. In our country there are many potential sites which
could be regenerated as well as examples analyzed in this paper. The biggest problem, beside
financial, is very low level of awareness of residents and completely unresolved legal and
property relations because of private public ownership.
REFERENCES
1
Cingramme folie: le Parc de la Villette/ B. Tschumi//Princeton Architectural Press,
1987
2
Parc
de
la
Villete/
T.
Nickerson//
published
on
web
site
http://people.umass.edu/latour/France/nickerson/
3
Reclaiming the High Line is a project of the Design Trust for Public Space, with
Friends of the High Line/ J. David// Ivy Hill Corporation,2002
4
The Park of La Villete Urban Park as a building/ C. Betsy//Places, Volume 4, pp 5256,
5
Transformation of Industrial Heritage - an Example of Tourism Industry Development
in the Ruhr Area (Germany)/ S. opi, J. orevi, T. Luki, V. Stojanovi, S.
ukiin, S. Besermenji, I. Stamenkovi, A. Tumari// Geographica Pannonica
Volume 18, Issue 2,June 2014, 43-50
6
http://www.dac.dk/en/dac-cities/sustainable-cities/all-cases/green-city/emscher-parkfrom-dereliction-to- scenic-landscapes/
7
https://www.bezregmuenster.de/startseite/abteilungen/abteilung5/Dez_51_Natur_und_Landschaftsschutz_Fischere
i/Oepel/Raeumlicher_Foerderschwerpunkt/Masterplan_Emscher_Landschaftspark_2010/index.
html
8
http://www.ruhrgebietregionalkunde.de/erneuerung_der_infrastruktur/freiraum_und_gruenflaechen_/emscherpark.ph
p?p=2,4
9
http://www.thehighline.org/about
10
https://www.planning.org/china/presentations/2012/pdf/fisher.pdf
338
.1
:
2014.
.
,
, , , , ,
. .
.
.
.
.
: , , ,
. ... , ...
339
1.
( ,
)
( 2014. ).
,
:
1.
.
(
).
2. , ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
3. (
). ,
, .
, ,
.
4. ()
, ,
. ,
,
,
.
5. ,
.
.
6.
,
.
.
340
, . .
,
.
2014. .
.1.
.2.
.3. .4.
341
.5.
.4.
2.
. -
, ,
.
, W G 2012.
:
W
(3/)
(3/)
2012.
2012.
596.105,41
363.868,35
1.571.197,42
959.073,69
414.940,81
253,110,23
465.442,09
284.110,23
258.168,57
157.588,53
273.871,30
106.132,68
723.455,02
441.603,75
.
873.048,78
539.917,19
166.109,96
101.395,08
5.242.339,36
3.199.973,28
3.
3.1.
(
: ),
342
.
.
,
.
, .
.
: , ,
, ( , ,
, , , , , ,
, .
.5.
3.2.
3.2.1.
, .
() SCS (Soil Conservation
Service)
1957. ., , ,
.
CN : CN
, SCS (Soil Conservation
Service USA, , 1957. ).
. :
343
A: ( ):
, ;
B:
;
C: ,
D;
D: ( ):
,
.
,
, ()
(
.
:
= 0,0195 (
L
I
) 0,77
1
(); L - (), I (/)
60
:
0 = 1,864 F 0,39 J -0,31 (): F - (km2), I (%)
: = 0,70 (0+20)1/8
: = (
Tk
3
(); ()
+ 0)
2
2k
: = (1+) ()
( P 0,2d ) 2
Pe (mm): =
P 0,8d
1000
- 10) (mm)
d = 25,4 (
CN
d (mm) -
CN
:
CN =
pi
CNi 100
Q (m3/sek) : Q =
344
0,56 xPexF
Tb
( ).
3.2.2.
Qmaks= A
32
(m3/sek)
0,5 A
-
( 0,6 2,0, 1,0)
3.2.3. Hofbauera
Qmaks=A
60
(m3/sek)
A
- , 75%
1000 =0,50
3.2.3.
Q 20 A A (m3/sek)
=1,1,
A=0,9, ,
=0,94,
3.2.4.
Riha ( )
Qmaks=qA1 21 2 (m3/sek)
q =14 m2/sek/km2, ,
A=6,94 km2,
1=0,68,
2=0,90, ( )
1=0,90 (1/4 )
2=0,90 ( )
3.2.5.
O
L
k0 ; O - ; L
S1=0,4ap+0,7app+anp
ap (%)
app (%)
anp (%)
345
S2=0,6a+0,8at+ag
a (%)
at (%)
anp (%) , .
W
W= yh2/L h(15-22h-0,3L )
h
,
,
.
2024. ,
:
,
,
.
,
, ()
( ) ,
, .
, .
[1]
[2]
[3]
/ //
, , 1972.
/ // , ,
2008.
/
2007/60
346
[4]
[5]
[6]
//
, 2014.
2024. / //
, 2012.
/ //
, 2005.
/ //
347
1, 2, 3
:
2014. .
.
,
,
.
, - .
: , , , , .
NECESSITY
FOR
MAKING
THE
LANDSLIDE
SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP IN THE EASTERN PART OF THE
REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA
Summary:
The paper points out the necessity of landslide susceptibility map preparation in the
Eastern part of the Republic of Srpska which is, after the floods in May 2014, the
most affected by landslides and where the material damages are extremely high.
This fact is not surprising, taking into account that this area is characterised by very
complex geological setting, susceptible to the development of landslide processes,
and that precipitation in May 2014 was about three times higher than long-term
averages. Making of the landslide susceptibility map is the first and the most
important step for the landslide hazard and risk assessment, which will be of great
importance for the future spatial planning.
Keywords: landslides, susceptibility, hazard, risk, Republic of Srpska.
, ., , e-mail: c.sandic@geozavodrs.com
.., , , e-mail: d.mitrovic@teol.net
3
.., , , e-mail: k.leka@geozavodrs.com
2
349
1
,
. ,
.
,
( 1). 2014. ,
3000 .
( , , ,
),
.
.
.
(landslide susceptibility map) .
,
.
, ,
, ( 2).
350
2
, , , , , .
,
- , .
,
351
-
. ,
, .
, ,
, , , . ,
, , .
-
( , )
,
,
.
,
, , .
,
.
,
, .
- , (
, ) , , , ,
. ,
.
, , , ,
, , , , .
(, , ),
.
- .
,
, , , .
, .
, .
3
.
, ,
.
[1].
352
, , ,
, ,
, . ( 3).
3
( )
. 2014.
(1514 ),
(532), (120), (111), (
100), (75), (70) .
353
,
. 20-
.
(landslide susceptibility map)
,
( ), ,
. ,
(. ), [2].
.
.
( 4).
. ,
.
HP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) ,
[4] .
354
,
, .
HP ,
.
, , , , ,
, .).
,
.
.
,
, [1]
.
,
1:25 000,
.
,
(), (layer-):
- ();
- (DEM);
- ;
- (LAND USE);
e HP
( 1).
(1):
n
M AHP wi Fi
(1)
i 1
wi ,
Fi (layer) 1.
1 AHP
Fi
Ko
Te
Wf
1
1
Ko
1
=1
355
, 0 1,
, .
[4],
.
(layer)
.
.
5
, .
,
,
, ,
.
(layer-) , (layer)
.
.
[3]. ,
,
, .
/ // ,
2012, , 1-27.
/ . // 33 1, ,
2012, , 173-189.
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Decision Making / R. Saaty // Creative
Decisions Foundation, 2003, Pittsburgh.
356
-
:
-
.
.
.
solid,
.
: ,
.. , . 6, 78 000 , -mail:ivanacurguz1@gmail.com,
357
1
.
.
. -
. .
.
.
.
.
2
2.1 PBAB87
PBAB 87
. [PBAB] :
:
max
Okp
hs
().
db
hsr /2
dp
hsr /2
hsr
d kp
hx
hy
hsr /2
d s hsr /2
1. PBAB 87
358
2.2 2
2
:
:
1.5
(Mpa)
2
.
() 2d. ,
.
2.
359
3.
3
3.1
.
, ,
.
,
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
3.2
.
360
, .
()
.
:
: Newton-Raphson-, NewtonRaphsonov, BFGS .
. Newton-Raphson-
. NewtonRaphson-
.
4.Newton-Raphson-, Newton-Raphson-
.
.
.
[9].
361
. snap-through.
.
3.4
.
SOLID
3D e.
interface
.
0.2l () .
.
(=0 0)
.
.
.
.
TNODIANA hr-Cooulomb-,
Drucker-Prager- .
resca-o ili Von
Mises- .
.
.
[5].
.
3.5
P-u
.
362
5. P-u
,
.
6.
4
-
.
.
.
[1]
EN-1992-1-1:Eurocode 2-Design of Concrete Structures: Commonrules and rules for
buildings/European committee for standardization, 2004.,Brussels.
363
[2]
[3]
/ . . /
, , 2000. , .
[4]
/ . /
, , 2007. , .
[5]
/ . , . , . / 65,
2013. , . 331-344.
[6]
[7]
Punching shear inReinforced Concrete Slabs Supported on Edge Steel Columns /S.
Ericsson, K. Farahaninia/ Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Chalmers University of Technology, Master's thesis, 2010.Gteborg, Sweden.
[8]
- 87/
, 1995, .
[9]
[10]
364
1 2 3
:
A ,
.
.
. (C8, FE).
,
tabs,
.
: , a , tabs
365
1 (ACCIDENTAL ECCENTRICITY)
1.1
, ,
,
.
,
.
1.2
( , ...)
() () .
,
.
( )
,
, ,
,
-.
1.3
. ,
, Newmark (1969).
Rosenblueth i Elorduy (1969)
.
.
, ,
.
1.3.1
.
.
.
366
.
, Mai =eai * Fi .
.
1.3.2
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
2 (EC8, FEMA)
2.1 EC8
8 (
) (
)
:
(1)
eai 0.05 Li
eai - i
, ;
Li - .
( ) ,
, ,
, :
367
1 0.6
x
Le
(2)
,
;
Li
,
.
,
,
eai
M ai
M ai eai Fi
(3)
M ai - i (
);
eai - i (1)
;
Fi - i, .
( ).
,
(2),
.
2.2 FEMA FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
FEMA-, ,
, M ta
,
5%
.
SDC-a(Seismic design category) C,D,E ili F,
1a i 1b (Sl.1), (T1),
M ta Ax :
368
Ax max
1.2
avg
(4)
max - x Ax 1 ;
avg - x
Ax 1 .
:
( )
.
Ax 3.0.
.
1.
Ax
369
1. Ax (4)
(L/B),
( )
. .
0.05L.
3
3.1
3.1.1
,
15x20m ( 5m ). 5
, . .(3)
.
3
.4 :
4.
[cm]
u X
u Y
C1
C2
C3
M1
25/50
25/50
45/45
45/45
45/45
15
M2
25/50
25/50
45/45
25/45
45/45
15
M3
25/50
25/50
65/65
45/65
65/65
15
M4
25/50
25/50
75/75
45/75
75/75
15
M5
25/50
25/50
85/85
45/85
85/85
15
8,
Etabs.
.
3.1.2
, .
370
Etabs EC8 B
0.3g.
.(4) :
1,5
1,2
(g)
0,9
0,6
0,3
0
0
t(s)
S1-Eurocode-8-2004
S2-ARRAY01
S3-HOLLISTE01
S4-LEXINGT01
S5-LEXINGT02
S6-YERMO01
S7-YERMO02
4
3.2
6,00
S-1
S-1+Ecc
S-2
[m]
S-2+Ecc
S-3
S-3+Ecc
S-4
S-4+Ecc
S-5
3,00
S-5+Ecc
S-6
S-6+Ecc
S-7
S-7+Ecc
0,00
0
12,5
25
37,5
50
[mmx10]
5 3
( )
371
[m]
6,00
T-2
T-3
T-4
3,00
T-5
T-6
T-7
0,00
0
15
30
45
60
[mmx10]
6 3
12,00
S-1
S-1+Ecc
S-2
S-2+Ecc
S-3
[m]
9,00
S-3+Ecc
S-4
S-4+Ecc
6,00
S-5
S-5+Ecc
S-6
3,00
S-6+Ecc
S-7
S-7+Ecc
0,00
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
[mmx10]
7 5
( )
12,00
[m]
9,00
T-2
T-3
T-4
6,00
T-5
T-6
T-7
3,00
0,00
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
[mmx10]
8 5
372
225
[mmx10]
250
200
a
ecc
150
100
a ecc
50
0
M2
M3
M4
M5
(time history)
9 2-5
4.
.
,
.
.
(Lateral Force Method)
. ,
,
30%.
,
,
.
(Spectrum analyses)
.
.
5% .
, ,
.
.
.
(Time history analyses)
373
.
. ,
. ,
.
,
.
.
5.
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
374
ejaa Mo1, aa 2
EE AO EJA EA, AE
OO AOJA A OO EOA EE AAA OA
:
ee je ae oo a je aae / o a e
oa oee . aj
a eoa eo a e ae eoa, ee ao
ooa ooea ea a aoo eje e
eaja a eo. Taoe, ee e
oa oa aaa eajaa. Oaj
a eaa a aaa oa a
o eea a e, o aee eae .
e e: ee, ea eaja, aoa o
, , e-mail: dejana.milinkovic@cis.org.rs
, , , e-mail: biljana.ilic@institutims.rs
375
1 O
o aa oajeo, ooo je ea e oe ee eea, ooo
ee aejaa a a ooa, aa, aa ojeaa. O o
oej ooo oa oja oja, ee aeja oo a
eoae oe, oo e aa eaa, e eaaj o
eoae e aa, e jaa e a eee, oojae aee,
a e o ooa ee a. aoo ojo ao ooaa ee
a oa oaja oa ojaa oe o oe ee ee
aejaa.
e a je ee eoa aa ae oo oje a oa
ooe ooe eea. oe ee oa, ea ooa eea
oaa je o 50% oea 4 jae oa 2013. o [1],
9,4 % 2012. .
e
. , 2013. 1,2 %
2012. , 157,2 [1].
2
ee je oo oj e aje e aee ooe ooe
aee, j ae o ae o aea eea. oa ae
eea o a oaaa aea, ajeo a aea aea,
oe oo ao eao e aaa oeo oje.
2.1
ae oje oe aea, oa a ee oj e aa /
oje a e ee je oa ao o ae
eea (". a ", . 34/2013 44/2014). O oeo eea je
eooje e a [2], aae
ae a aa ae eea, eo ajo, oaaae, ao ae a
(TO), a oeaa ea eo
aaa.
( )
, j
oje , ,
,
, .
ao je eao 27 ooa aj o oa eeaa
:
CEM I - (>95% )
CEM II - - (65-94% )
CEM III - (5-64% )
CEM IV - (45-89% )
CEM V - (20-64% ).
376
aa aae ,
28 : ,
( 32,5; 42,5 52,5). oao, a
o ae aae oe o: a oe a
oo oeo oo, oaea oo N, a a oo oeo
oo, oaea oo R, a a o oeo oo, oaea oo
L. aa L e oe e ao a CEM III eee, ooo eae eee
e oee oe.
2.1.1
ae a aoje a oo eea
a aoj a oo eea :
oa-ee e (K);
aaa a oe e (S);
oa aeja (P, Q, V, W);
ea (L, LL);
aoe a (T);
aa a (D).
oe aoj oaj a ao ee, ooo oaa,
ooeoa, oe aee ao o oo aa ooe
oe e ej aajo a oeaaj oe eea a oo, a oj a
a a ooo eoa aea ea aa, a aj a
aae o ooje. ajee e oaj a eaa eea eaa eea,
ooaa eao ooe ooaa ojaa eea ao o
oao aaae oe [3].
ae ee aoe ao oeaa eo aojaa
o ea ee. oa, oo oe 20 oa oa ja a e
aajj o aa oao. Eao ooo oee aejaa
oaa, oj ae aea ao e ae oe ae aaa,
ao aea ea ea ee, ooe eeje
- , oo oee o
eoo ea o eaa aeooa oo oaa.
,
, aa a oe e oea ooe ea,
ee eeo oea ooe eeje aoeaa a oa
aeja oj ae e-, -, -, oae
oj eaj eae eee a aea eja o-eaa
oja eea, oj ao a, ae ojea, e eaaj oao o
ae o e.
2010. 1990. o 8,3
-a. ee a aaje ea
a a a aee,
e e [4].
377
2.1.2
,
1 2.
1 - ae oe ea ojaa
oa , MPa
aa
oe
32,5 L
32,5 N
32,5 R
42,5 L
42,5 N
42,5 R
52,5 L
52,5 N
52,5 R
oea
oa
oea eaa,
min
aaa
oa
2 aa
7 aa
10,0
10,0
20,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
12,0
16,0
16,0
-
Eaja,
mm
28 aa
32,5
52,5
75
42,5
62,5
60
52,5
45
10
2 - ae oe ojaa
ojo
eao
oaa)
a/T eea
CEM I
CEM III
CEM I
CEM III
aaj aa
(ao SO3)
CEM I
CEM II)
CEM IV
CEM V
a aee
aaj oa
oaa
ao
aa oe
aea)
e ae
5,0%
e ae
5,0%
CEM III)
e e)
32,5 N
32,5 R
42,5 N
42,5 R
52,5 N
52,5 R
e ae
e ae
CEM IV
e ae
a)
3,5%
4,0%
0,10%)
aooaa
ae
378
T eea
aa oe
(SO3)
PC-SR 0
PC-SR 3
PC-SR 5)
P 35-SR
P 55-SR
32,5 N
32,5 R
42,5 N
42,5 R
52,5 N
52,5 R
C3A
)
PC-SR 0
PC-SR 3
PC-SR 5
P 35-SR
P 55-SR
P 35-SR
P 55-SR
aea)
3,0%
3,5%
=0
3,0%
5,0%
9,0%
a)
2.1.3
ajo
379
380
42,5 (kg/m )
200
260
300
320
C8/10
C12/15
C16/20
C20/25
[6]:
;
;
(. );
( );
;
.
CEM I CEM II/A-S. ,
CEM I CEM II/A-S,
,
, XA.
5.
2.2.2
,
, SRPS
U.M1.206 ,
(w/c)max, , (Dmax) 16 mm
32 mm, , ,
50 .
5.
381
5
I -
(w/c)
max
II -
III -
IV -
XC4,
XD1,
XD2,
XA1,
XD1+XF2
XC4+XF3
XA2,
XM1
XM2
X0
XC1
XC2
XC3
XC2+
XF1
0,75
0,65
0,55
0,55
0,55
0,60
)
0,55
0,50
0,55
)
340
360
340
360
380
360
.
.
300
340
.
3
kg/m
)
(w/c)max
V
XD3,
XA3,
XM3
(XD2,
XD3)+
XF4
0,50
0,45
0,50
380
380
380
2.3 ,
,
, ooa eo
a, ooo o, ao ooa eo a je eoa a
eoje ee je, ao e oj aoae eea, je a
a oee oae
oaje oje e ooe a eaae eee eeaa o ae
o e, a a oa oj ej aaj, aoae
oeeaae eaja.
2.3.1
382
383
: .
a o eea o (eaoao) a, a eeoa
aaje Cr (VI), eee oeeaaa e eeae oaje o
oaoa ea a oeeee e eeoo a.
a o aaj eeoo ta (". a ",
. 100/2011).
oao, o eea a eeoa aaje Cr (VI), e oa a
ae, ea a ae, eo oeo ao o ae
oeja oea, eee/oaje oje aeae a ee
e e eo aoee oja e oo a oe aa eo aea
oo oje e oaa oja eoo ea oje oaa aaj
aoo oa (VI) o 0,0002%, ao oaeee o oao oje a:
EUH203: "a o(VI). Moe a aoe aej eaj."
3
, ,
. ,
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
?
[1] Activity report 2013, published by CEMBUREAU, The European Cement Association
[2] ao o e aea a ooe (. a , oj 36/09)
[3] a o ae eea (". a ", . 34/2013 44/2014)
[4] The Cement Sector: A Strategic Contributor to Europe's Future, The Boston Consulting
Group (BCG), 2014
[5] SRPS U.M1.206:2013 , ,
SRPS EN 206-1,
[6] SRPS EN 206-1, - 1: , ,
,
[7] a o oaea aaaa ooe, aaa oe
oea eaja (". ", . 90/2013 i 25/2015)
[8] oo eo aooao ae oa, aa ooa
ooaa, , , aeaa
ae .., ae
384
1, 2, 3
MAR
:
- MAR .
MAR
.
,
.
, .
: ,
, .., -- , e-mail:
mjaksic@agfbl.org
2
. , .,, , e-mail: ljubisav@grf.bg.ac.rs
3
. , .., -- , e-mail:
muljarevic@agfbl.org
385
1
(
: MAR Managed Aquifer Recharge)
[1].
:
.
MAR
-
.
.
,
, .
, 4 ,
, , , .
:
-
, ,
( , ) ;
-
,
,
;
- ( )
,
;
- ,
, ( )
[2, 3].
MAR
(.
).
,
.
[4].
.
: ( )
( ).
386
2
2.1
.
: ( x- y- ), ,
,
[5].
[6]. 1 [6]
,
[5].
FB = v d s 3
FL = CL v u2ds2
~ 0 ds2
PROTOK
FD = CD v u2ds2
~ 0 ds2
FR
FW ~ s d s 3
1
( [5]). FB- , FL-
, FD- ,
FR- , FW- , V- , S , ds- , ds3- , V-
, CD- , CL- , 0-
, u- .
1
()
.
387
2.2
,
- .
.
.
, ,
, ,
(. ) [4,
6].
, ,
.
2.
.
[6].
FB = v d s 3
PROTOK
FS = h v ds2
FL = CL v u2ds2
Sloj slabe
vodopropusnosti
~ 0 ds2
FD = CD v u2ds2
~ 0 ds2
FR
FI = CI v uI ds2
FR
FW ~ s d s 3
2 o
( [5]). FI-
, FS- , CI- ,
h- , uI- .
388
2,
() ,
(J = i V).
,
Louisville (Kentucky, USA),
0,6 m 5 m, 2.1 m
0.03 m [7].
,
.
.
, ,
,
.
,
. ,
.
.
.
[6].
4
MAR
.
, .
,
.
.
.
MAR ,
389
,
. [2, 8].
. ,
,
[6].
[1] Dillon, P.J. (2005) Future management of aquifer recharge. Hydrogeology J. 13 (1): 313316
[2] Bouwer, H. (2002) Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering.
Hydrogeology J.10: 121-142
[3] Hutchinson, A., Milczarek, M., Banerjee, M. (2013) Clogging phenomena related to surface
water recharge facilities. In: Martin, R. (ed.) Clogging issues associated with managed aquifer
recharge methods. IAH Commission on managing aquifer recharge, Australia, 95-106
[4] Zhang, Y., Hubbard, S., Finsterle, S. (2011) Factors governing sustainable groundwater
pumping near a river. eScholarship, University of California, U.S.A., http//
www.escholarship.org/help_copyright.html#reuse
[5] , . (1991) - 4. . ,
, 483 .
[6] Hubbs, S.A. (2006) Evaluating streambed forces impacting the capacity of riverbed
filtration systems. In: Hubbs, S.A. (ed.) Riverbank Filtration Hydrology. Springer, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands, 21-42
[7] Hubbs, S.A. (2006) Changes in riverbed hydraulic conductivity and specific capacity at
Louisville. In: Hubbs, S.A. (ed.) Riverbank Filtration Hydrology. Springer, Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, 199-220
[8] Martin, R. (2013) Introduction. In: Martin, R. (ed.) Clogging issues associated with
managed aquifer recharge methods. IAH Commission on managing aquifer recharge, Australia,
4-10
390
1, 2, 3, 4
CHS
-N
:
-N CHS
, () ,
.
( , ).
,
-N,
CHS .
.
( ISO 834 ).
: , , ,
391
1.
,
.
,
.
(-)
.
.
,
. ,
, , ,
,
.
,
,
.
, ,
. ,
[2][6].
, ,
. , ,
. ,
,
[2].
.
,
, . ,
,
. (
)
.
() . (
) [9].
[9]. ().
, .
.
.
-N CHS
, , ,
.
392
2. -N
( )
[5][6]. 1
CHS
.
.
1: CHS (
) : ) =273 ; ) =457 ; ) =609 ;
CHS ,
, , :
,
- 2 % (20 / 3),
, 834 ,
C 30/37 ( ), S 355, B 400/500,
1 [5],
(, , ) [ 5] , :
Npl,Rd = Aa * fyd + Ac*fcd + As*fsd ,
[] NA = Npl,Rd; Mpl,Rd= 0
.
2:
[B] NB = 0, B = pl,Rd
.
C = Mpl,Rd
394
3. ( - N )CHS
.
, : ,
, -
, ,
.[3].
CHS ,
( 1), .
: 30, 60,
90, 120 180 .T
[4][6].
-N ,
CHS , ,
, 3,4 5.
N (kN)
3500
3000
2500
2000
20 C
1h
1500
0,5 h
2h
1000
1,5 h
500
3h
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
My (kNm)
3 : N,CHS , D =273 ,
, 30,60,90,120 180 ;
395
N (kN)
10000
9000
8000
7000
20 C
6000
5000
4000
2h
3000
2000
3h
1000
1h
0,5 h
1,5 h
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
My (kNm)
4: N,CHS , D =475,
, 30,60,90,120 180 ;
N (kN)
17000
15000
13000
11000
9000
0,5 h
7000
1,5 h
5000
3h
1h
20 C
2h
3000
1000
-1000 0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
My (kNm)
5: N,CHS , D =609 ,
, 30,60,90,120 180 ;
(N), ()
, ,
6,
.
396
Npl,Rd,t / Npl,Rd
120
Mpl,Rd,t / Mpl,Rd
Npl,Rd
110
110
100
100
90
90
80
80
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
Mpl,Rd
120
180
t (min)
30
60
90
120
150
180
t (min)
6: , ,
;
CHS D = 273
180 78,5 % 86,1 %
. ( D = 609 ) ,
34,4 % ,, 45,9 % .
CHS ,
, 7.
6.
T (
Npl,Rd
1200
1200
1100
1100
1000
1000
900
900
800
800
700
700
600
600
500
500
400
400
300
300
200
200
100
100
00
00
30
30
60
60
90
90
120
120
150
150
180
180
tt (min)
(min)
7.
, .
397
8
2 h (120 )
, ,
.
8. , ( )
CHS , 2 h ( 120 ) ( ISO 834);
4.
, M-N .
,
[1][2][3].
8, CHS
.
M-N
.
CHS
. ,
,
.
, ,
, CHS ,
( ) .
.
398
[1]
Cvetkovska, M., Nonlinear Stress Strain Behaviour of RC Elements and Plane Frame
Structures Exposed to Fire, Doctoral dissertation, "Ss Cyril and Methodius" University,
Macedonia, 2002.
[2]
Cvetkovska M., Milanovi M., Jovanoska M., Cifliganec C., Parametric analysis of
fire resistance of centrically loaded composite steel-concrete columns, 15th
International Symposium of Macedonian Association of Structural Engineers, Ohrid,
Macedonia, 2013
[3]
CHU Thi Binh, Hollow steel section columns filled with self-compacting concrete under
ordinary and fire conditions, Doctoral dissertation, University of Liege, 2008.
[4]
[5]
EN 1994-1-1: Eurocode 4 : Design of composite steel and concrete structures Part 1-1
: General rules and rules for buildings ( 2005 ) ,
[6]
EN 1994-1-2 - Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures, General rulesStructural fire design, July 2005.
[7]
[8]
Johnson, R.P., Composite structures of steel and concrete, Vol. 1: Beams, slabs,
columns, and frames for buildings, second ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications,
Oxford, 1994.
[9]
399
k1, 2
:
.
, ,
.
CFRP
,
.
.
: CFRP, , ,
1
2
, p, , @t-com.me
, , , nataly@ac.me
401
1.
, , ,
.
FRP (fiber reinforced plastics) ,
, ,
,
,
.
- , .
, FRP
.
.
CFRP
,
.
, .
FRP
FRP .
FRP ,
(.1).
1 - 1:(a) ;
(b) FRP ;(c)
402
2.
, .
. ,
.
, ,
, FRP .
, , ,
, FRP
, .
,
, , .
3.
:
- ;
- ;
- ,
;
-
.
, ,
, ,
.
3.1.
9
, 7.8 (.2).
30.0
9.0
43.0
R
7.0
2 -
403
, , .
.
, , ,
35kN.
, .
, .
,
, ,
. ,
.
,
, .
.
3.1.1.
, ,
.
,
. ,
, . , ,
,
, .
, .
,
.
, 50 1.2 , -,
, 4 , . ,
.
4 6 ,
.
3.2.
3 .
, 7400 .
, 10 N, , 80 N.
60 -,
15 , .
3.2.1.
, 1/1000 , ,
, 250 .
404
, 1/1000 100 .
,
100 , , .
, .
.
a .
, 0.025 .
, ,
.
, ,
, , L .
3 -
4.
, 91%,
. .
. ,
, .
, x 7.96
35 kN, , , 2.1 .
65 kN 6.8 .
, 35 N,
20.46, 6.79.
405
, 35 N,
5.28, 7.29.
65 N,
, 0.34,
7.59.
.
.
,
.
, 3 ,
35 kN, 40 kN.
, 60 kN
0.8 .
5.
FRP
10 160%. , 70%
.
,
:
- 91%
, ;
- ,
, ;
- ;
- , ,
;
- ,
,
. , ,
,
.
6.
,
, ,
:
-
, ;
406
,
.
.
, .
FRP
. , ,
CFRP ,
, .
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for
strengthening concrete structures // ACI 440.2R-08 - American Concrete Institute,
Committee 440, 2008;
Debonding of FRP in bending: Simplified model and experimental validation / R.J.
Casas, J. Pascual, 2007;
Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures // CEB-FIP, 2001;
Experimental performances of RC beams strengthened with FRP materials / F. Ceroni,
2010;
Flexural strengthening of RC beams using externally bonded FRP sheets through
flexible adhesive bonding / J.G. Dai, T. Ueda, Y. Sato, T. Ito, 2005;
Failure diagrams of FRP strengthened RC beams / B. Gao, C.K.Y. Leung., J-K. Kim,
2007;
Strengthening reinforced concrete beams using fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)
laminates / N.F. Grace, G.A. Sayed, A.K. Soliman, K.R.Saleh, 1999;
Numerical analysis of RC beams flexurally strengthened by CFRP laminates / A.R.
Khaloo, A. Gharachorlou, 2005;
Bond between FRP and concrete in reinforced concrete beams strengthened with near
surface mounted and externally bonded reinforcement / R. Kotynia, 2011;
Prediction of failure Load of RC beams strengthened with FRP plate due to stress
concentration at the plate end / A.M. Malek, H. Saadatmanesh, M.R. Ehsani, 1998;
Structural retrofitting of reinforced concrete beams using carbon fibre reinforced
polymer / Y.T. Obaidat, 2010;
RC beams strengthened with GFRP plates / H. Saadatmanesh, M.R. Ehsani, 1991;
Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures with Fibre Reinforced Polymers / A.S. Shamim,
2001;
Strengthening of initially loaded reiforced concrete beams using FRP plates / A. Sharif,
G.J. Al-Sulaimani, I.A. Basunbul, M.H. Baluch, B.N. Ghaleb, 1994;
407
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
408
1, 2, 3
:
,
, .
, ,
, , .
.
.
: ,
, , , milicajp@arh.bg.ac.r,
, , @gmail.com
3 , , stankovicarh@arh.bg.ac.rs,
1
2
409
1.
.4 [1].
. ,
, 5
, ,
.
,
.
. ,
.
,
, ,
, , .
,
.
. 6
2.
,
.
, .
, . ,
410
: ,
, ,
, , , ...
.
.7
, , ,
, .
. ,
, ,
() ,
.
,
. 8 ,
,
9
-.
10
. ,
, .
,
.
, .
, , .
, .
.
.
Introduction to sustainability assessment at the local level / D. Devuyst, in:Devuyst,
D.,Hens, L. and De Lannoy, W. (eds.) How green is the city: Sustainability assessment and
the management of urban environments, New York. 2001, Columbia University Press: 1-36
8
/ ,.
,., , , , . , .
, 2013: , ,
9
/ ,. ,.,
, , , . , . , 2013:
, ,
10
/
.135/2004 36/2009
7
411
,
, ,
.
1
.
.
..
412
(
)
./
( )
413
3.
1. ,
, ,
.
.
.
, ,
,.
.... ,
11
,
.
.
, , ,
,
:
- ,
,
;
- ,
, , ,
;
- :
, ,
, ,
;
- 2
;
- ;
- ,
(, ) ( , )
;
- ,
, ( )
;
- ;
- ,
;
11
;
, ,
;
-
.
-,
.
,
, . ,
.
,
.
.
, .
4.
. ,
: ,
. , ,
.
: , ,
, . ,
,
, .
,
.
.
, .
,
, ,
.
415
/ ,.
,., , , , . , .
, 2013: , ,
/ ,. ,.,
, , , . , . , 2013:
, ,
/
.135/2004 36/2009
Fair Society, Healthy Lives: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post2010/ M. Marmot / /2010 The Marmot Review
Healthy Urban Planning: Setting the Scene / H. Barton// 2005, Built Environment, 31:
281-287
United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-2014: Draft
International Implementation Scheme/ United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO)// 2005: 1-52
[8]
[9]
[10]
416
1, 2, 3
:
17.000 (2011. 2012. ),
CO2 .
.
, ,
.
.
: , ,
RESIDENTIAL
Summary:
National Serbian residential building typology was developed based on field survey
conducted in the period 2011-2012 during which the inventory was made of more
than 17000 single and multifamily houses. The typology enables estimations of
energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in the process of building renewal.
These assessments are used in National plans and strategies development. Same type
of estimations is needed on local, municipal, level for development of Local action
plans. In the paper, two possible approaches to the problem and methodologies for
development of local and regional typologies are described as well as the range of
their use.
Keywords: National typology, energy efficiency, building rehabilitation
, , , milicajp@arh.bg.ac.r,
, , ignjatovic.dusan@gmail.com,
3 , , stankovicarh@arh.bg.ac.rs,
2
417
1
4
.
5 , ,
10 .
, ,
. ,
( 6, ),
, ,
, 20 .
,
: 7
.
2.
, ,
. ,
, 2002. ,
2011. . ,
, ,
. 2011. 2012.
,
.
4 , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., , .,
, . 2013: . ,
,
5 www.tabula.eu
6 www.episcope.eu
7 European Commission, Notices from European union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. Guidelines
accompanying Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 of 16 January 2012 supplementing Directive
2010/31/ EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of building by establishing a
comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance
requirements for buildings and building elements, Official Journal of the European Union, C 115 (2012): 1-28.
418
2.1.
. ,
, .
6500 , 12000 .
.
, ,
, ,
.
, .
, ,
, . ,
,
.
8.
.
9.
2.1.1.
:
. ,
,
. ( ,
, : ,
, , ).
.
, ,
.
, ., , ., , ., , ., , ., ,
., , . 2012: ,. ,
,
9 , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., , .,
, . 2013: ,. ,
,
8
419
, ,
,
,
, ,
( 1.). .
, , ,
.
1 1:1 1:2
2 1: >2
3
1 , ,
50%
2 , ,
50%
3 , ,
50%
1
2 ,
3 ,
4 ,
5
6 ,
7 ,
8 ,
1 ,
2.1.2.
.
.
, 42 .
( 2.)
420
, ,
.
,
10
,
.
.
. ,
11
, , :
, 61. 2011.
11 ,
" ", . 53/2013
2013. 2015. ,
" ", . 98/2013
10
421
.
2.
3.
, ,
,
.
, , ,
70 20000
. 2011.12
12 , 2013. ,
22:
422
3231931 , 113956
475759 . ,
.
,
.
,
.
3.1.
:
- (top-down)
- (bottom-up).
.
,
,
,
, .
. ,
, . ,
.
.
.
, ,
.
, ,
.
,
, . ,
,
, , ,
.
3.2.
,
. (top-down)
.
423
a)
b)
3. ,
3.2.1.
.
40-60000 , 12%
.
, . ,
( 3)., ( 40 10 4), ,
. 8002
( 641
). ,
( ).
, , 36040 15986.
11 165 21716
2 142 518 m2 ( ).
424
4.
() () ,
425
3.2.2.
.
300
. ,
, ,
.
,
.
( 1945. )
:
.
,
,
(
) (
).
20 ( 4).
.
,
.
,
.
3.
. , ,
.
.
.
, ,
.
.
426
, .
.
.
(10pt, bold, ALL CAPS, 12pt before)
1
(k) / . , . ,... //
, , , , . (10pt, 3pt before)
/ , ., , .,
, ., , ., , ., , ., , . //
, , , 2012.
/ , ., , .,
, ., , ., , ., , ., , .//
, , , 2013
/ , .,
, ., , ., , ., , ., ,
., , . // , ,
2013.
/ ,
, :
61. 2011.
, 22:
/ // , 2013.
www.episcope.eu
www.tabula.eu
427
P
A
BEOMA
MKPOAPMPAO PKAO ETOA
MAO
:
, o
om mkpoapmpao o a (MA)
y. a okycom oy
y y .
ea o -oo o a 148-
a MA.
ta
MA 8 . pca
o MA ce y.
: , ,
pca, y, .
1
dr, univ.dipl.in.gra, direktor, IRMA Intitut za raziskavo materialov in aplikacije, Sloveneva 95, 1000 Ljubljana,
Slovenija, jakob.sustersic@irma.si
2
dr, univ.dipl.fiz., voa sistema kvalitete, IRMA Intitut za raziskavo materialov in aplikacije, Sloveneva 95, 1000
Ljubljana, Slovenija, andrej.zajc@irma.si
429
1 INTRODUCTION
The principle of improvement in the early age bearing capacity of tunnel lining made by
fibre reinforced shotcrete (FRS) has been studied during the investigations on the research field
in Dekani Tunnel, on the highway Ljubljana Koper, as part of the research project: The
Improvement of Tunnel Primary Lining in Rocks of Low Bearing Capacity by the Use of FRS
[1]. The use of FRS practically eliminated the use of reinforcement mesh and the still arches
from the primary lining. The effect of this was twofold: the savings were achieved both in the
use of the material and time. Also, the safety on work has been improved, as there was less
exposure of workers to the vicinity of the excavation face.
It seems that, bearing capacity of FRS tunnel lining improved, because of equivalent
strengths at the selected crack widths were high enough at the early age of FRS, already and
shortly after the placement of FRS lining, respectively. This statement is based on the results of
observations and measurements of the lining deformations and convergence of tunnel profiles,
respectively, as well as the results of investigations of FRS properties. Following properties of
FRS were carried out: compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, ultimate flexural strength,
and properties obtained by wedge splitting test (WST) method: ultimate strength, strength at
the first crack and equivalent strengths up to selected crack width (CW = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4
mm). The measurements of these properties were carried out on 3, 7, 28 and 110-day-old
specimens.
Increase of compressive strength at early age up to 2 hours, approximately was measured
with penetrating needle on the fresh sprayed FRS in the test panels. Compressive strength of
1.0 MPa was obtained at 1 h and 40 min, on average after the placing of FRS. Further progress
of compressive strength in regard to age of FRS is shown in Figure 1.
compressive strength (MPa)
60
50
40
30
20
cubes
early strength
10
cylinders
112
105
98
91
84
77
70
63
56
49
42
35
28
21
14
0
age of FRS (days)
430
Increase of compressive strength is relatively higher in early age (up to some days after
construction) in comparison with increase of older FRS. So, average compressive strength of 1day-old FRS is over 20 MPa what is already 50%, approximately of average compressive
strength of 110-day-old FRS. Results of those investigations show increase of compressive
strength in connection with time, but there is no evident how the FRC behaves when a
compressive load is in action. First of all, there is a question whether FRC behaviour is ductile,
as well at early age or right after construction, respectively. It means that we are interested in
descending branch of stress strain ( diagram, or post-peak softening response,
respectively. What kind of influence have fibres on behaviour of young FRS, is the second
question of our interest. Therefore, we began with the research project with the intention of
search for the answers to those questions.
The tests of young FRS and shotcrete without fibres (SC) have been carried out on the
samples only few hours after their preparation at very law levels of compressive strength. Thus,
the fresh FRC and SC were prepared in a laboratory mixer with a vertical shaft and after that
they were cast in moulds and compacted on a vibrating table. In the paper, some initial and
typical findings of the current project are shown.
E ci c
(1)
2
1 c
c ,1
where: c is the compressive stress, c is the compressive strain, c,1 is the compressive strain
at the peak stress, Eci is the tangent Youngs modulus expressed by:
2 f cm
c ,1
where fcm is the peak stress.
(2)
E ci
431
90
12 hours
80
70
load (kN)
60
50
7 hours
40
30
20
3 hours
10
0
0
10
12
14
16
deformation (mm)
Figure 2: Compressive load deformation diagrams of FRS at the ages of 3, 7 and 12 hours.
Experimentally obtained stress strain diagrams show higher ductility when they are
compared with stress strain diagrams derived from the equation (1). Experimental and
calculating stress strain diagrams of 7-hour-old FRS is shown in the Figure 3, as an example.
4
experimental c - c
c (MPa)
calculating c - c
2
0
0
[ /00]
432
softening, recommended by RILEM Technical Committee TC 148 SSC [5], has been used
after that and it is still using during the implementation of the research project.
433
FRS-8
load [kN]
2
FRS-3
1,5
FRS-2
SC-2
SC-3
0,5
SC-8
0
0
deformation [mm]
Figure 5: Characteristic load deformation diagrams of SC and FRS at ages of 2 hours (SC2, FRS-2), 3 hours (SC-3, FRS-3) and 8 hours (SC-8 and FRS-8).
If those diagrams are converted in stress strain (c c) diagrams and compared them
with calculating c c diagrams in accordance with the equation (1), better conformity is
achieved (Figure 6) then in the case of experimental diagrams obtained with tests carried out
on the halves of beams (Figure 3). Those correlations show that problems of specimen
geometry and boundary conditions during the compressive test can be solved to a large extent
by using test method recommended by RILEM TC 148-SSC.
Diagrams given in Figure 5 show a great influence of fibres over the behaviour of FRS at
all its ages. At the age of 8 hours even more when the difference in behaviour of SC and FRS
becomes significant. SC and FRS differ as well in regard to peak stress fcm. FRS reaches higher
fcm than SC (Figure 7).
Obtained values of fcm of SC and FRS (Figure 7) are very small at all ages in comparison
with those of FRC which has been used for construction of the tunnel lining on the research
field in Dekani Tunnel (Figure 1) where average fcm of 1,0 MPa has been obtained 1 hours and
40 minutes, already after placing. The main goal of the project, represented in this paper is to
investigate behaviour of FRS right after construction when its strength is steel very low.
434
Therefore, smaller content of accelerator was used during preparation of laboratory mixtures of
SC and FRS to make the investigations of their behaviour feasible at low strength levels.
0,3
c [MPa]
experimental c - c
0,2
calculating c - c
0,1
0
0
0,1
0,2
c [
0,3
0,4
/00]
Figure 6: Experimental and calculating stress strain diagrams of 8-hour-old FRS; uniaxial
compressive tests were carried out with the method recommended by RILEM TC
148-SSC.
0,3
fcm (MPa)
0,25
FRS
0,2
SC
0,15
0,1
0,05
0
0
Figure 7: Average values of peak stress fcm of SC and FRS at ages of 2, 3 and 8 hours.
Behaviour of SC and FRS is evaluated in regard to amount of absorptive energy up to the
limit stress c,lim with selected value of 0,5 fcm. Different sorts of absorptive energies are
435
calculated from single diagrams shown in Figure 5. Average values of absorptive energy Wc,lim
up to the selected point c,lim on the c c diagram are given in Figure 8. Schematic view of
Wc,lim is shown in Figure 8 below.
16
14
FRS
W c,lim (Nm)
12
10
8
6
4
SC
2
0
0
Figure 8:
Fibres effect, significantly on increase of ductility of FRS right after placing, in spite of
poor bond between fibres and hardening cement paste in young FRS. The same efficiency of
fibres is obtained when behaviour of FRS is evaluated by absorptive energy Wc,1 up to the peak
stress fcm and by absorptive energy of descending part of diagram c c or area of strain
softening, respectively Ws between fcm and c,lim. Average results of both absorptive energies
are given together in Figure 9, with the intention of simple comparison of differences between
Wc,1 and Ws of SC and FRS at ages up to 8 hours.
FRS reached much higher Ws than Wc,1 at all ages. Their differences are much higher than
differences between Ws and Wc,1 of SC, moreover Ws is even smaller then Wc,1 at the age of 8
hours. Those results prove much higher ductility of FRS in comparison with SC.
Strength as well as absorptive energy of FRS increase with increasing of its age as it can be
seen from Figure 10 where characteristic c c diagram are shown.
Average value of the peak stress of FRS increases from 0,26 MPa (obtained on 8-hour-old
FRS) up to 3,32 MPa (obtained on 24-hour-old FRS). Huge increases of all measured
absorptive energies Wc,lim,Ws and Wc,1 are obtained at the age of FRS of 24 hours (Figure 11).
436
10
10
8
3h
6
Wc,1, Ws (Nm)
8h
4
2
2h
0
SC
FRS
Wc,1
SC
Ws
FRS
SC
FRS
Figure 9: Average values of absorptive energies Wc,1 and Ws of SC and FRS at ages 2,3 and 8
hours.
35
30
FRS-24
load [kN]
25
20
15
10
5
FRS-8
0
0
deformation [mm]
Figure 10: Characteristic load deformation diagrams of FRS at age of 8 hours (FRS-8) and at
age of 24 hours (FRS-24).
437
140
120
100
80
FRS-8
60
FRS-24
40
20
0
Wc,lim
Wc,1
Ws
Figure 11: Average values of absorptive energies Wc,lim,Ws and Wc,1 of 8 and 24-hours-old
FRS.
4 CONCLUSIONS
High influence of added steel fibres was obtained at the beginning of the research project
where early age behaviour of FRS is investigated. Results obtained by uniaxial compressive
test method recommended by RILEM TC 148-SSC show that fibres improve ductile behaviour
as well as increase peak stress of young FRS up to age of 8 hours. Improvements in those
properties of young FRS increase bearing capacity of FRS tunnel lining right after the
placement. Results of further investigations which will be carried out within the framework of
the project should make an answer to many questions arisen out from first results and findings.
We expect that those responses and new statements should give proper data for development of
model of young FRS behaviour in tunnel lining.
REFERENCES
1. uteri, J., Jovii, V., Zajc, A., Ercegovi, R. Evaluation of improvement in the bearing
capacity of fibre reinforced shotcrete tunnel lining. Eds: Di Prisco, M., Felicetti. R., Plizzari,
G.A. Fibre-Reinforced Concrete. BEFIB 2004. Proceedings of Sixth International RILEM
Symposium, 20-22 September, 2004, Varenna, Italy. RILEM Publications S.A.R.L., Vol. 2,
pp. 985-994.
2. Desayi P., Krishnan S. Equation for the Stress-Strain Curve of Concrete. Journal of the
American Concrete Institute, Vol. 61, No. 22, 1964.
3. Kotsovos M.D. Effect of testing techniques on the post-ultimate behaviour of concrete in
compression. Materials and Structures, Vol.16 (1983). str 3 12.
4. Van Mier J.G.M. Strain Softening of Concrete under Multiaxial Loading Conditions.
PhD thesis. Eindhoven University of technology (1984).
5. RILEM TC 148-SSC: Strain softening of concrete Test methods for compressive
softening. Test method for measurement of the strain-softening behaviour of concrete
under uniaxial cpmpression. Recommendations. Materials and Structures, Vol. 33 (2000).
str. 347 351.
438
1, 2, 3
- ACC -
:
Atlas Capital Center
CC .
, 15 x
15 6.
.
10.
: ,
, , ...,
, , ...,
3
, , ...,
2
439
1
tlas Capital Center ACC
.
,
,
.1.047 (. 4/1987).
, ,
.
.
.
:
;
15% ;
.
2
tlas Capital Center - ACC .
, 15 x
15 6 ( 2.1).
2.1-
.
, 108
(D108x10/6/5/3.5). ( )
( )
D273x10.
( 2.1).
10. ,
0361.
440
3
( 3.1),
.
,
. .
.
( 3.1),
350 .
3.1-
2, 4, 6,
8 10, ( 3.1).
(350 x 19 = 6650), .
,
: 0, 150, 250, 350, 250, 150, 0.
64
( 3.2) : ( 3.2),
, 2, 4, 6, 8 10.
/
. 15
. 2
.
3.2-
441
4 -
: , ,
, ,
.
. .
.
/
, .
.
,
. ( 4.1 4.2)
.
4.1- ,
4.2- ,
5
1. 2014. ,
700 1800 . (
64 ) 900 ( ) 1630
( ).
( , )
30 /.
.
442
25/
( ).
900 ( ).
,
.
, , 9
/.
, .
Leica TCR1202 R100
.
.
5.1- . 150/
5.2- . 250/
5.3- . 350/
443
6
( 3.2),
1.
1 - -
ULAZNI LUK - MJERNA MJESTA UL1-UL9 - KOORDINATE
nulto mjerenje - optereivanje - rastereivanje
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
kg - 0
kg - 150
kg - 250
kg - 350
Ulazni luk
X
Y
Z
UL1
Ulazni luk
X
Y
Z
UL2
Ulazni luk
X
Y
Z
UL3
Ulazni luk
X
Y
Z
UL4
Ulazni luk
X
Y
Z
UL5
Ulazni luk
X
Y
Z
UL6
Ulazni luk
X
Y
Z
UL7
Ulazni luk
X
Y
Z
UL8
Ulazni luk
UL9
X
Y
Z
105.137
106.857
100.294
kg - 0
106.648
105.414
102.894
kg - 0
105.084
104.328
104.498
kg - 0
102.661
103.706
105.202
kg - 0
100.537
103.482
105.246
kg - 0
98.375
103.456
104.971
kg - 0
95.499
103.741
104.084
kg - 0
93.398
104.755
102.137
kg - 0
93.768
105.888
100.317
105.137
106.857
100.294
kg - 150
106.652
105.414
102.892
kg - 150
105.086
104.328
104.497
kg - 150
102.662
103.706
105.199
kg - 150
100.539
103.481
105.242
kg - 150
98.376
103.454
104.967
kg - 150
95.497
103.74
104.083
kg - 150
93.396
104.754
102.136
kg - 150
93.767
105.887
100.317
105.137
106.857
100.294
kg - 250
106.655
105.413
102.89
kg - 250
105.09
104.327
104.494
kg - 250
102.663
103.704
105.194
kg - 250
100.54
103.48
105.237
kg - 250
98.376
103.454
104.963
kg - 250
95.497
103.739
104.081
kg - 250
93.395
104.753
102.136
kg - 250
93.767
105.888
100.317
105.137
106.857
100.294
kg - 350
106.655
105.412
102.889
kg - 350
105.09
104.327
104.492
kg - 350
102.664
103.704
105.191
kg - 350
100.54
103.479
105.233
kg - 350
98.377
103.454
104.96
kg - 350
95.498
103.739
104.08
kg - 350
93.394
104.753
102.135
kg - 350
93.766
105.888
100.317
kg - 0'
105.137
105.137
106.857
106.856
100.294
100.294
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
105.137
106.857
100.294
kg - 0'
106.655
106.652
105.412
105.412
102.89
102.891
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
106.649
105.413
102.894
kg - 0'
105.089
105.087
104.327
104.327
104.495
104.496
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
105.085
104.328
104.5
kg - 0'
102.663
102.662
103.704
103.704
105.194
105.197
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
102.661
103.706
105.203
kg - 0'
100.54
100.539
103.48
103.48
105.237
105.241
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
100.538
103.482
105.247
kg - 0'
98.376
98.376
103.454
103.453
104.962
104.965
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
98.375
103.455
104.971
kg - 0'
95.498
95.498
103.739
103.739
104.081
104.083
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
95.498
103.741
104.085
kg - 0'
93.395
93.396
104.753
104.753
102.136
102.136
kg - 250' kg - 150 '
93.398
104.754
102.137
kg - 0'
93.767
105.888
100.317
93.767
105.887
100.317
93.767
105.888
100.317
, :
; 15%
(1);
;
, ;
.
1
2
., ., .:
,
, ..., 2014
- .1.047
444
:
.
.
.
.
: ,
, , ,
, .
445
1.
/
,
,
. , ,
,
.
2003. , UN
.
,
. 1
, 18. 2003. ,
( 02/03),
,
.
20.04.2011.
(
44/11).
, ( , .
59/09), ( ,
40/13),
.
, ,
.
,
.
2010-2014.- http://www.impuls.rs.ba/dokumenti/strategija_fbih.pdf
446
2.
. 2
,
.
,
, ,
.
,
.
.
.
,
.
.
(
) , ,
.
1.5. 3
,
.
, :
,
,
,
,
. 4
: ?; Disability
Monitor Initiative South East Europe Rights, Social Innovation and Policy Reforms: http://www.disabilitymonitorsee.org/documents/dmi3_srb/DMRII_serweb.pdf (20.3. 2011.)
3
ADA Standards for Accessible Design; Departman of Justice:
http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstandards.htm (20.3. 2011.)
4
: ?; Disability
Monitor Initiative South East Europe Rights, Social Innovation and Policy Reforms: http://www.disabilitymonitorsee.org/documents/dmi3_srb/DMRII_serweb.pdf (20.3. 2011.)
447
3. /
-, 70- 20.
. .5
.
.
,
. .
1950-
1960-. ,
1960-.
, UN 1993.
.
. 6
(EIDD) 1993. .
1995. ,
, .
,
. ,
, , .
:
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. ;
7. . 7
, 9. 2004.
, EIDD ( )
.
The principles of Universal Design - The Center for Universal Design (CUD):
http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm (4.4.2011.)
6
Dizajn za sve http://ukljuci.in/index.php/bs/dizajn-za-sve (4.4.2015.)
7
EIDD Stokholmska deklaracija EIDD for All Europe
http://www.designforalleurope.org/upload/design%20for%20all/sthlm%20declaration/stockholm%20declaration_s
lovenian.pdf (4.4.2015.)
448
4.
,
,
.
( .
44/11, 20.04.2011.. ) -
, ,
.
:
(
, , ,
),
(, , ),
( ,
,
). 8
,
.
- ,
, ,
.
,
. ,
,
.
.
. , , ,
. , , .
, ,
.
, .
. .
8
. 44/11 - 33.
449
,
, .
,
.
.
.
,
, .
33. ,
, ,
, ,
. 9
87. ,
,
,
. 10
,
.
(
).
.
.
,
, . ,
( 76/07 38/09).
.
5.
, , , , ,
9
. 44/11 - 33.
. 40/13 - 87. 1. 3.
10
450
, .
, ,
?
,
, ,
() . ( :
, CLIO 2001, . 93)
-
.
,
. ,
. 11
,
.
.
,
, ,
.
,
,
.
.
.
,
.
,
,
.
,
, ,
.
(
)
.
( )
,
11
. 40/13 - 87. 1. 3.
451
.
.
-
.
,
.
. 12
/
3.
.
, , ,
( ).
. 13
. 18-21.4.2013.
.
.
(, , ).
.
,
,
, ,
,
, o ,
. ,
.
12
: http://www.ho-partner.rs.sr/en/ (4.4.2011.)
13
/ :
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1735525733339946.1073741863.1425435307682325&type=3
(4.4.2015.)
452
[1] , , :
/ ,
, , 2010.
[2] , :
, Expeditio,
2007.
[3] , :
, CLIO, 2001.
[4] . 2/03 ( 18. 2003..) -
[5] . 44/11 ( 20. 2011..) -
[6] .76/07 38/09 -
[7] . 44/11 ( 20. 2011..) -
:
[2]
2010-2014.http://www.impuls.rs.ba/dokumenti/strategija_fbih.pdf (19.3.2011.)
[3] :
?; Disability Monitor Initiative South East Europe Rights, Social Innovation and
Policy Reforms:
http://www.disabilitymonitor-see.org/documents/dmi3_srb/DMRII_serweb.pdf
(20.3. 2011.)
[4]ADA Standards for Accessible Design; Departman of Justice:
http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstandards.htm
(20.3. 2011.)
[4] The principles of Universal Design - The Center for Universal Design (CUD):
http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm
(4.4.2011.)
[5] : http://www.ho-partner.rs.sr/en/
(10.4.2011.)
[6] :
453
http://www.zotovicbl.com/2013/04/univerzalni-dizajn-i-adaptirano-stanovanje-izperspektive-radne-terapije/ (4.4.2015.)
[7] /
:
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1735525733339946.1073741863.1425435307682
325&type=3 (4.4.2015.)
[8] Dizajn za sve http://ukljuci.in/index.php/bs/dizajn-za-sve (4.4.2015.)
[9]EIDD
Stokholmska
deklaracija
EIDD
for
All
Europe
http://www.designforalleurope.org/upload/design%20for%20all/sthlm%20declaration/stockh
olm%20declaration_slovenian.pdf (4.4.2015.)
454
1, 2
:
.
.
.
, ,
.
: , , ,
1
2
, .., ; isidora_karan@yahoo.com, ,
, .., , arh.milana@gmail.com,
455
1
1.
, . ,
, ,
.
, :
, , , .
, ,
.
,
.
. ,
(, ,
, .), .
, ( )
. ,
.
j
,
. , ;
. 2.
, .
. .
2.
, ,
. ,
3.
,
,
4. ,
, ,
, .
,
?
,
456
.
.
.
, .
,
,
5.
.
, ,
, .
.
, ,
.
,
60- .
.
(inner cities), e /
6.
,
, (
Machizukuri). , ,
,
.
,
.
,
, .
.
,
. , ,
-
. , ,
.
- ( ,
), ,
,
, ,
, - 7.
, 60-
,
,
457
8.
. ,
.
,
. ,
.
, ,
, .
, , ,
9. ,
,
. ,
, ,
.
3
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
.
, ,
.
, 10.
,
, ,
. , ,
,
. ,
, ,
. 11
, ,
12,
,
.
458
,
, (Ibelings) 13.
a (Zukin) 14.
, ,
,
. 19952010, , .
,
, ,
15. ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
()
,
( )16.
,
,
( ) .
,
.
.
,
.
4
4.1.
,
,
( 2006)
( 2004).
3 4,
3
: , , , , ,
, .
( 2004, .99)
459
.
, , , -
( 2004, . 106; 2006,
. 24) 17. , -.
,
(., . 27, . 30) 18.
(., . 31; 2004, . 109).
( 2013) ,
.
,
( 2013, . 47, . 48).
,
( 2013, . 48 2) 19.
,
.
4.2.
.
, ,
.
, ,
,
. ,
(
), ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
.
, , 200
,
(
).
4
, , ,
,
, ,
( 2004,
.100)
460
,
( ,
),
.
, , ,
. ,
,
( ), .
2006.
,
,
,
.
,
20. 2012.
,
. ,
,
. ,
, ,
.
2009. 2010. 5 MDPi6
14 ():
, .
, ,
(
), .
: 1.
;
2.
3.
.
5
,
, ( 2007, . 49). ,
, ,
,
.
.
6
, (MDPi)
461
: 1.
,
, 2010. ; 2.
; 3.
MDPi ,
7; 4.
.
( 21) ,
,
.
4.3.
22
,
,
, .
, ,
.
, ,
, ,
, .
, ,
,
.
,
,
.
7
- .
.
,
. , ,
, -
.
. ( , :
, 2011)
462
,
,
,
, .
(2010) ,
,
23. -
,
. , 35%
(.), , ,
.
(2009),
24.
, -,
81%
/ (.).
5.
A ,
, ,
:
, ,
. ,
- . ,
.
:
.
, ,
, ,
,
. , (Machizukuri),
.
. ,
, ,
, ,
, .
463
.
. , , ,
( ,
), , ,
( , , .).
, , ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
.
/ // ,
; UDK: 342.25:342.7,
23. 02. 2009, , 292-298.
/ //
; , , 4
8
9
464
/ www.vladars.net
18
/www.fbihvlada.gov.ba
19
/
.40, 2013.
20
: ,
, 1. / Stilling //
: , 2006, , 1-9.
2124 :
/ // ,
, 2011, 5-23.
22 Participation of Citizens in Town Planning Procedures inNeighbourhoods with Former
Refugee and DisplacedPopulation in Prijedor, Bosnia and Herzegovina / Latinovic, R.
// Places and Technologies, Belgarde, 2014, 1090-1098.
23 2010 / // www.cci.ba, 614
465
1, 2
:
.
.
,
.
,
. ,
.
,
.
: , .
, ..., ,
..., ,
467
. ,
.
, ,
.
,
. ,
.
. ,
1975/76. .
, :
-
,
- 26
,
- .
,
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
. ,
.
5, 10, 20, 50 100 .
26
,
.
1.
,
, ,
1975/76. .
. 0 0C
,
-0,2 0C, .
468
, .
0
0
C .
1.1.
.
,
, .
, .
,
.
, ,
.
1.1.1.
, .
,
.
, , :
- ,
.
, . ,
2 mm 40 mm .
,
.
1.1.2.
, .
, 07, 14 21
, 1975/76. .
10 100 .
, .
, ,
.
,
, .
,
,
469
, .
.
1.2.
, ,
, :
- It,
- hIp,
- hIk.
1.2.1.
.
.
1.2.2.
() ,
.
10% .
,
,
.
1.2.3.
.
1.2.4. ( )
,
, .
,
:
D PM = h2 -
h 2 - h1
T2
| - T 1 |+ T 2
[cm]
(1)
je:
DPM - cm,
-1 - , .
0C,
+2 - 0C,
h1 - , 1 [cm] ,
h2 - , 2 [cm] .
470
.
.
X Y,
, :
- X0 = 1.0,
X0
- It ,
X1
- hIp,
X2
- hIk,
X3
:
X4, X5, X6 - 100,
Y
- DPM u (cm).
2.
,
,
U.S.C.S.
U.S.C.S., , .
0,1 50%
50% .
159x7 , 41x7
200x7 .
.
p=80%. , . p=90%,
(*) , p=95% (**).
:
;
[cm]
(2)
DPM = 6.4416 - 0.3100 hIp - 0.0599 hIk -0.1167 hIp2 **
r2 = 0.3437
r = 0.5863
;
DPM = 8.4033 - 0.0566 It - 0.2666 hIp- 0.0602 hIk
r2 = 0.8177
;
DPM = 7.5968 - 0.0277 It -0.2246 hIp - 0.0691 hIk
r2 = 0.5079
[cm]
(3)
[cm]
(4)
r = 0.9042
r = 0.7127
:
DPM
It
hIp
- cm,
- ( 0C),
- (
0C,
- ( 0C,
hI k
, ),
Ip2; hIp2, hIk2 - 100.
471
: r2 - ,
, r -
.
, .
,
,
.
3.
. ,
.
(4),
1988. .
, ,
- , , . , .
,
,
, :
Pe ( D PM )
:
Pe ( D PM )
m 0,3
* 100
N 0,4
(%)
(5)
- ,
- (
),
- ( ).
,
, .
2
.
D PM , ,
,
,
.
. .
5, 10, 20, 30, 50 100 ,
.
.
472
,
.
()
, , :
NV - km,
RV - (NV
/NV ) km.,
GD - , GD-150,
GS - , GS-450,
UM - , 500
450 160 km.,
US - ,
km,
KT - , 7 (),
, 1 7.
, ,
5 100 .
, :
[cm]
(6)
r=0.8973
DPM, r2=0.8051
.
( ) DPM (6),
50 .
, (6),
, 1.
1.
5
10
20
30
0.528
0.651
0.789
0.837
50
1.000
100
1.184
.
5', 1145 .
, 1:50.000
. (6)
. , ,
473
,
5 cm, 1.
DPM ,
50 .
, ,
, 1.
1.
[1]
The frost penetration problem in highway engineering, / A. Jumikis //, Ruteres University
press, 1955., New Brunswick, New Jersey
[2]
Thermal sojil mechanics, / A. Jumikis //, Ruters University press, 1966., New Brunswick,
New Jersey
[3]
, / . //, ( ), 1973.,
[4]
, / .
//, ( ), 1978.,
[5]
, / . //, ( ), 1996.,
474
.1, .2
:
. (LEGEND)
(R Thermal Response Test). . R-
(100
) 67,5 W/m 6,75kW.
4,7kW 0,9kW = 3,8 kW
(100m ).
R- 2,05 W/mC.
: ,
1
2
475
LEGEND
.
b
.
,
. ,
TRT- (Thermal Responce Test).
LIR EVOLUTION, .
.
.
65 .
10
. .
.
P=390,35 m , P=302,06 m
88,29 m.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
476
.
.
.
.
90
91
93
90
91
4995000
91
90
93
116
240
205
170
250
175
225
93
95
190
95
183
95
95
4990000
277
287
236
145
125
138
219
193
98
94
277
146
93
94
435
136
101
181
205
204
170
4995000
93
92
5000000
6465000
4
km
104
123
4990000
5000000
6460000
146
162
6460000
6465000
.
, .
:
,
,
,
.
477
3.1
.
.
.
.
.
30 m .
.
3.2
.
.
.
.
.
3.3
.
,
.
.
3.4
.
2 m .
35 m.
478
-. Thermal
respons test .. , ....
4.1
TRT-
100 m, 4,7 W 47 W
. Eskilson (1987) Eklof&Gehlin (1996)
>5*2/.
0,090 m (2), Kappelmayer (1974)
0,08-0,09
m2/d, (
) 10-12 .
( 2) ,
9 (
, ).
3 TRT BHE-1
479
, /
,
0/-2C,
EN14511
/ (0C 35C
).
67,5 W/m 6,75 kW.
,
40C.
, 5,0/3,0C 4,7 kW COP
~2,8 @ 55C , 6,7 kW 0/-2,0C
COP 2,4 @ 55C .
.
,
,
(28,4/26,3C) 23hr
4,7kW ( +7/12C EER
5,1 0,9 kW
.) , 4,7 kW 0,9 kW = 3,8 kW
.
,
(35C
A/C ).
(35/33C ) 7,4 kW
2,1 kW 7,4 kW - 2,1 kW = 5,3
kW, EER=3,5. ,
A/C .
,
.
480
5
BHE-1
1.
BHE-1, .
.
( ).
. ,
.
TRT in
TRT out
inv TRT in
Watt
30,0
48,6
28,0
26,0
48,2
24,0
47,8
20,0
47,4
18,0
16,0
47,0
Watt/m
Temperatura,C
22,0
14,0
12,0
46,6
10,0
46,2
8,0
6,0
45,8
4,0
Buotinskiizmjenjivatopline100m
2,0
0,0
5,0
45,4
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
Sati
1 . BHE-1
(
)
ln(t).
,
,
Eklof&Gehlin (1996)
:
Q
4 H
gdje je:
g - , W/m C,
H - , m,
481
Q - , W,
- .
Series1
Linear (Series1)
27,5
Temperatura,C
27,0
26,5
y = 1,844x + 6,723
R = 0,997
26,0
25,5
25,0
Buotinskiizmjenjivatopline100m
9,8
10,0
10,2
10,4
10,6
10,8
11,0
11,2
ln(t)>sekunde
2 BHE1
(
) 4754
W, 3. 1,844.
TRT 106 kWh. 0,997
. 100 m
Eklof&Gehlin 2,05
W/mC
.
.
.
-.
. TRT
.
.
, 2014:
, ...,
, 1984: ,
482
1, 2, 2, 1,
3
I
:
,
-, 2014. ,
-,
. ,
a ,
. ,
: , ,
.
: , , ,
483
1.
, , 1518. 2014. , ,
. -
, 19.1.
, (). ,
, - , ,
.
.
I ( ).
,,.
,
, ,
, .
, , ,
.
, , ,
. , (
), .
, , .
, ,,
, ,
,
()
.
,
, ,
a ,
.
2.
, ,
, ,
I .
- 150-600 mnv,
.
-
, 600 1000 mm.
484
3.
()
, 1: 500,
,
, , ,
, .
:
1 : 500, 10 ha;
: 22 238,80 m,
, , 120 m.
: ,
, ,
.
.
: .
, .
4.
4.1
30-40,
10-15. 20 30
. , ,
- , .
, , ,
. , ,
.
, (. 1
).
485
1 - , ()
19.05.2014 ( . ).
, :
, -
- ,
. .
,
, ,
. ,, .
() I .
, , (,, ).
, .
( ),
, -.
: ,
,
. ,
.
,
- ,
.
- , , .
-
. , ,
, 10-15 l/s.
486
, ,
.
- , ,
, ,
,
.
4.2
-
. ,
. - 2-5 m,
10-15 m, 20 m.
: -
:
, . , ,
.
. ,
, .
.
, .
, - : = 19 - 22
kN/m3, = 17 - 22, c = 10 - 25 kN/m2, ' = 11 - 13, c' = 0,00 - 0,84 kN/m2, s 10.000
MPa, = 3.000 - 5.000 kN/m2, = 0,38, Vp = 350 - 410 m/sec, = 89 - 2322 m.
: = 11,16 - 12,56
c = 0 - 3 kN/m2.
, . ,
, ,
- .
- .
, . ,
, .
, ,
( ), ,
. ,
.
487
2014. .
,
.
-
,
. ,
() .
, -
, (. 1. ).
-
, .
- .
.
.
, ,
.
( ). ,
- ,
,
. - ,
, .
.
390 m,
130-140 m. ,
,
(. 2 . 3):
. .
190 m, 40 m,
, 150 m . ,
10-15.
, 25-35.
- , ,
5 m, 10 m.
20 m. , ,
3-5 m 7 m.
4 5 m. , 18.000 m2,
70.000-90.000 m3.
488
2 - ,, :1
; 2 ; 3 ; 4 ; 5 - ; 6 ; 7 , -
; 8 ; 9 ; 10
; 11 - ; 12 ; 13
.
489
3 - : 1
; 2 ; 3 - ; 4
- ; 5 -
; 6 , ,
; 7 , ; 8 ; 9 .
70 m, 150 m
, 120 m .
, 1-3 m. ,
,
.
, 10-15,
20-30. ,
10-15. ,
25-35 .
, ,
- , , :
5 m, 10 m,
15 m. 4-7 m 8-9 m.
5-6 m. 9.500-10.000 m2,
47.000-56.000 m3.
. 77 m,
150 m, 120 m . ,
. , ,
. ,
,
. 2-3 m, .
490
30-35, 35. ,
, 10-15. , ,
25-35. 3-4 m,
5 m. 0,7ha,
30.000 m3.
D 55 m,
50 m , 15 m . .
, ,
.
3-4, 6 m. 0,2 ha,
5.000-6.000 m3.
aj , .
, .
, .
3,5-3,7 ha
150.000-180.000 m3.
( )
,
.
1,7 ha, 72.000-88.000 m3. ,
.
,
.
5.
,
,
. , ,
, ,
: , ,
.
,
, ,
. 15 m, 4,8 m
2,00 m, .
, ,
, 11 15 m,
.
491
- .
.
, , , ,
, .
,
, .
()
- .
.
, .
, ,
.
, ,
,
. 4 l/sec,
2 l/sec.
15-20 l/s .
, ,
50-60 m, 3-5 m.
, ,
.
, ,
,
, , .
, .
[1] Ib 26
, 1 /, ./
, 11 000 , 2014..
[2] ,, ,
/, ./ -
, 2014..
492
1, 2
- :
:
50- .
.
.
, BAB-87 SRPS
.
: , ,
RAINFORCE
BUILDINGS:
PRACTICE
CONCRETE COLUMN
INTERNATIONAL VS.
OF HIGH RISE
LOCAL DESIGN
Summary:
The article presents typical column design alternatives of typical 50 story high rise
building. It presents international and local design practice on RC columns design in
high rize buildings. Presents comparison of design floor load requirements and load
reduction factors. It discusses on usage of high strength concrete, detail detailing
requirements, and limitations of BAB-87 SRPS standards.
Keywords: high rise building, RC column, High Strength Concrete
1
2
493
1 50- -
- 50-
, . 1 , 44m
38m ,
,
.
6m. 12m,
1m.
3.6m. 35cm.
42m.
1 50-
494
2 M
BAB87 (SRPS) [1]
MB60 ( ), EC2 [2] ACI318 [3]
( ) EC2 (C50/60)
ACI318 (C50) . BAB87 (SRPS)
( - ) MB60 fb=33MPa,
II fb=35.5Mpa.
EC2
fcd=ccfc/m=1.050/1.5=33.33MPa ,
.
cc (
) cc = 0.8-1.0,
cc=0.85 UK. cc
.
fcd =0.8550/1.5=28.33MPa.
m=1.5 .
ACI318 fcd =
0.85fc = 0.650.8550 = 27.625MPa. =0.65
,
EC2. 0.85
cc EC2.
BAB87 (SRPS)
B500, EC2 B500B ACI318 ASTM A615 Grade 75.
fy =500MPa.
2
50 .
.
.
Markabet. Markabet.(C50)
Arm.SRPSB500 Arm.EC2B500B
(C50/60)cilindar
cilindar
Arm.ACI318
ASTMA615
grade75
Sprat
Markabet.
(MB60)kocka
Level
fc,srps(MPa)
fc,ec2(MPa)
fc,aci318(MPa)
fy(Mpa)
fy(Mpa)
fy(Mpa)
50
40
30
20
10
1
60
60
60
60
60
60
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
2 50-
495
3
JUS (SRPS) U.C7.121 [4], EC 1 [5] ASCE
7-10 [6]
. ( 3) : (SW col.),
(SW slab
0.8kN/m'), (SDL)
(LL). (SDL) 2,0kN/m.
JUS (SRPS) U.C7.121, EC 1 ASCE 7-10 3,0kN/m ( 1).
1
JUS U.C7.121, EC1 ASCE 7-10
[4],[5],[6], :
.
2
, ,
,
,
. JUS
U.C7.121 (kN/m)
2.0
(
0.1x0.1m
1.5kN)
Sprat
Prip.Pov.Stuba
Namena
Level
At(m)
Purpose
50
40
30
20
10
1
42
42
42
42
42
42
Office
Office
Office
Office
Office
Office
. EC 1
(kN/m)
,
2.0 3.0
(
0.05x0.05m 2.0
4.0kN)
. ASCE7-10
(kN/m)
2.4 4.79,
(. 8.9kN)
Opt.(SW,SDLiLLopt.vred.opt.premaSRPS,EC1,ASCE710)
SWcol.(kN/m`) SWslab(kN/m)
9
16
25
36
49
49
8.98
8.98
8.98
8.98
8.98
8.98
SDL(kN/m)
LL(kN/m)
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3 50-
4
BAB87 (SRPS)
:
f 0 .3
BAB87 (SRPS):
f 0 .3
496
3
At
0 .6
n
: t , n . .
EC2 ,
,
.
2 (n 2) 0
; 0 0.7
n
ACI318
,
,
0,7.
4.57
ACI318: f 0.25
; K LL 4( , ); f 0.7
K LL AT
EC2: f
4
:
Sprat
SRPSkoef.red.
korisnogopt.
EC2koef.red. ACI318koef.red.
korisnogopt.
korisnogopt.
Level
af
af
50
40
30
20
10
1
0.763
0.481
0.431
0.408
0.394
0.385
0.450
averagef
1.000
0.755
0.729
0.719
0.715
0.712
0.748
averagef
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
averagef
4
,
,
50 f=0.45.
EC2 f=0.75.
,
,
f=2.1/1.50.45=0.63, 11%
. ( ),
1.0,
, 30%
.
ACI318
,
497
0.6,
,
f=2.1/1.60.45=0.59,
f =1.6/1.50.60=0.64, 11%
. . ( ),
1.0, ACI318
, 15% .
,
EC2 ACI318.
.
.
:
( 15%);
;
;
; ,
; ;
,
.
2:
2 ()
BAB 87 (SRPS)
EC 0
ACI 318
1.9
1.35
1.2
2.1
1.5
1.6
2
:
BAB87 (SRPS):1.9x(SW+SDL)+2.1xLL,
EC0:1.35x(SW+SDL)+1.5xLL,
ASCE 7-10:1.2x(SW+SDL)+1.6xLL.
498
6 -
.
10 ,
. ( 5) 1400x1400mm,
200mm,
10 600x600mm.
5,
10 . 12
100mm . 2%.
25mm.
Br.Red.Glavne Br.Sip.Glavne Prec.Glavne
Arm.
JednaStrana
Arm.
Sprat
Vis.zgrade
Dim.stuba
Level
H(m)
a(mm)
na
bpersi
50
40
30
20
10
1
180
144
108
72
36
3.6
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1400
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
8
8
9
9
Poprecne
uzengije
Pov.Glavne
Arma.
Kof.Arm.
bardia.(mm)
/l
Ar(mm)
Ratio(%)
25
25
25
25
25
25
12/100
12/100
12/100
12/100
12/100
12/100
7850
11775
15700
15700
17662.5
17662.5
2%
2%
2%
1%
1%
1%
7
( 6) BAB87(SRPS),
EC2 ACI318 , 3.6m.
50 =21.
BAB87 (SRPS) dop=25, EC2 dop=42-13.2 (
) ACI318 dop=34 ( 1=0,
M2=0, 1 2 ). oj
EC2 ACI318
:
lim,EC 2 20 A B C / n
: =0.7 (. .), B=1.1 (. .), C=0.7 (. .), n
499
M1
)
M2
N ED
Ac fcd
dop.vitk.BAB
dop.vitk.EC2
87(SRPS)
Sprat
Dim.stuba
Vitk.stuba
Level
a(mm)
,srps
50
40
30
20
10
1
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1400
21
16
12
10
9
9
25
25
25
25
25
25
dop.vitk.ACI
318
Prip.Pov.
Stuba
,ec
,aci
At(m)
40.4
16.5
14.9
14.5
14.6
13.0
34
34
34
34
34
34
42
42
42
42
42
42
6
7 :
Ar fy
BAB87 (SRPS): N c , SRPS Ac fb (1
); fb 33MPa
Ac fb
N c , EC 2 (( Ac Ar ) fcd Ar fyd ) 0.85;
EC2:
fcd cc
fc
0.85
50
500
28.33Mpa; fyd
434.78MPa
1.5
1.15
Dim.stuba
Level
a(mm)
50
40
30
20
10
1
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1400
Nc,srps(MN)
Nc,ec(MN)
Nc,aci(MN)
13.1
22.9
35.4
49.9
67.4
67.4
11.4
19.5
29.5
40.1
54.6
54.6
9.8
16.9
25.8
35.6
47.5
47.5
7 50
BAB87(SRPS) 2040% EC2 ACI318 .
BAB87 (SRPS)
20-40% EC2 ACI318 . EC2 ACI318
.
1 ( 8)
EC2 ACI318 .
EC2 ACI318
, ACI318
80%, EC2 ,
500
85%
.
ACI318
EC2
EC2uticajiiiskoriscenost
napona
ACI318uticajiiiskoriscenost
napona
Sprat
Dim.stuba
Level
a(mm)
Nu,srps(MN)
Nu/Nc(%)
Nu,ec(MN)
Nu/Nc(%)
Nu,aci(MN)
Nu/Nc(%)
50
40
30
20
10
1
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1400
1.1
12.0
23.2
34.8
47.2
59.0
9%
53%
65%
70%
70%
88%
0.9
9.1
17.5
26.4
35.8
44.8
8%
47%
59%
66%
66%
82%
0.7
7.9
15.4
23.2
31.6
39.6
7%
47%
59%
65%
66%
83%
9 50
5%-10%.
.
MB60
,
,
,
.
.
,
501
,
.
8
:
,
(EC2, ACI318).
:
1.
EC2 ACI318 .
2.
EC1 SRPS
2kN/m2, ASCE 7-10 y
2.4kN/m2.
3.
,
EC2
ACI318.
4.
, , ,
SRPS
5-10% EC2 ACI318.
5.
, MB60, ao
,
.
.
EN 1992-1-1 2004Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for
buildings
EN 1991-1-1-2002 Actions on structures Part 1-1: General actions Densities,selfweight, imposed loads for buildings
502
1, 2
3
:
,
.
CAD GIS , 3
.
3 ,
,
.
.
: , GIS , , .
1
2
503
1.
.
. ,
.
,
.
, [1].
: , , , . 2 ,
[2].
Delaunay ,
, : ,
, , [2]. - 3 ,
, , () ,
, ,
.
2.
3 .
3 , utoCAD - 3DFACE. 3
3 4 , Z
, . 3
, 3
[1].
. ,
.
. .
(),
.
,
, .
.
, , ,
.
Delaunay [3]. ,
(Triangulated Irregular Network).
, ,
. ( 1.).
504
1. -
Delaunay
. ,
,
[2].
, Delaunay ,
( 2. 3.)
2.-
505
3. -
3.
Survey 1990.
.
, , 4 000
50 .
. 1996.
- .
C VisualLISP AutoCAD-a.
1996. 2015. .
AutoCAD,
[3].
,
:
- ,
- ,
- .
, ,
3 .
,
(), [4].
506
4.
: (),
(), (),
, , .
.
[5].
, ,
.
(). ,
,
.
. ,
, , .
, , ,
.
. ,
.
, R 6l,
=3l, l .
,
a .
, .
[5].
4.1.
()
, ,Y,Z .
,
: , ,
. ,
,
. :
1. ,
2. ,
3.
4. .
, . ,
,
layer - .
. ,
. ,
507
,
.
,
Z ,
- . 3 ,
( 4.).
4. - 3
5. ,
3 .
5. - 3
508
4.2.
,
, .
.
, .
,
[6].
,
( 6.).
6. - 1
1. -
Fu
Fn
Vu
Vn
[m]
[m2]
[m2]
[m3]
[m3]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[m3]
PR 1
0+000.00
5.71
2.68
0.00
PR 2
0+030.00
4.48
1.57
152.85
63.75
89.10
PR 3
0+046.34
11.39
12.13
129.66
111.93
17.73
PR 4
0+049.36
14.21
13.38
38.66
38.52
0.14
PR 5
0+050.11
14.85
13.44
10.90
10.06
0.84
PR 6
.
.
:
0+065.43
13.02
14.9
213.48
217.08
-3.60
25686.36
22795.75
2890.62
509
5.
3
.
,
.
3 . (
), ,
.
,
,
.
,
/ M. // , 1993.
, , / // M.
// 98, , 1998.
/ // , 2006.
510
1, 2, 3
,
:
, , , .
, ,
.
.
, .
: , , , .
511
1.
, ,
.
, ( ),
, ,
,
.
, ,
o , , ,
.[5]
2.
.
.
.
, .
, ,
.
,
. ,
.
: ,
, : 9000, Q
(otal Quality Managament), Six Sigma, , 5,
,
. ,
[1]
j
, .
,
. [2][3][4].
3.
,
.
.
.
512
. [6]
: , , .
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
, .
.
,
. [8] [9]
4.
,
, ,
. , ,
,
,
. Kruskal-Waillisov (
, , ).
.
,
(1 , 2 ,..., 6
), j
(, , , )
. - web
- docs.google.com- 1401 , 79
, 810 (
.), 512 .
, , ( )
, ,
.
Kruskal-Waillisovim ,
0,05 MannWhitneyevim /
T- ,
16.0,
513
,
/, / [7]. Relative Importance Index
(RII) 0 1, ,
.
5.
( 1)
(RII=0,838),
(RII=0,827),
, ...(RII=0,823),
(RII=0,783), (RII=0,793), , ... (RII=0,783),
(RII=0,783), (RII=0,770),
(RII=0,766), (RII=0,764),
(RII=0,736). :
, , , ...,
, ,, ..., ,
, , ,
.
( 1)
o . 2
. ,
1
. 2
/
, /.
, 3 ,
/.
4 /
, . ,
5
/. ,
6
/. ,
7
/.
, 8
/. 9
,
/. ,
10
/. ,
11
514
/.
, 11,
/.
1 -
Figure 1 - The importance of quality factors
( 1)
(RII=0,827),
515
2 -
Figure 2 - The quality factor and phase of the project (project participants)
516
, Kruskal-Wallis 16.0
3.
3 -
Figure 3 - Success Factor "Mission" and phase of the project (project participants)
517
6.
, /
e
.
,
.
( ).
,
.
'''' : ,
, , .
[1] Construction quality in China during transition: A review of literature and empirical
examination, /P. Yung, B. Yip//, International Journal of Project Management 28, 2010.,
pp. 7991
[2] A Review of Safety and Quality Issues in the Construction Industry, /A. C. Ogwueleka//,
Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Korea, 2013., pp. 42-48,
[3] Management of Safety for Quality Construction, /N.H. Husin, H. Adnan, K. Jusoff//,
Journal of Sustainable Development, 2008., pp. 41- 47
[4] A framework for building quality into construction projects- Part I, /C.D. Joaquin, D.
Hernandez, E. Aspinwall//, Total Quality Management, vol. 19, no. 10, 2008., pp. 10131028
[5] , /. //, , 2011.,
[6] Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects, /Chan A.P.C.,
Chan D.W.M., Y.H. Chiang, B.S. Tang, E.H.W. Chan, K.S.K. Ho.//, Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE 130 (2), 2004., pp. 188198
[7] The use of project management software in construction industry, /M. Vukomanovi, M.
Radujkovi , Z. D. Alduki//, Technical Gazette 19, 2012., pp. 249-258
[8] Success of projects in different organizational conditions, /I. Hyvri//, Project Management
Journal, 2006., pp. 31-41
[9] Critical Success Factors of Large Design-Build Projects in Vietnam, /C.N. Dang, L. LeHoai, Y. D. Lee//, Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 2012.,
pp. 30-39
518
1, 2
:
( c )
.
Brinch Hansen
.
: , ,
1
.., .., 11000 ,
43, e-mail :simo.tosovic@gmail.com
2
, ,
519
1.
; ,
. ,
, .
,
. 2:3, ,
.
.
, ,
.
, ,
.
,
,
.
.
, , .
.
. .
, .
, .
Brinch Hansen (
(1-3)
10%
, . ,
, , ,
.
,
.
2.
(.Brinch Hansen, 1963):
a *b
(1)
, Brich Hansen
:
(2)
a b *
520
(3)
a b *
, : ,
, . Ducan-Change-ov
(Kondnerov)
.
b :
x
a x *b
:
y - ( ) ,
( 1 3 ) .
x - ( l ) ,
, ( h / H )
.
-
x,y
b -
y .
.
a b (Kalhawy and Duncan,
1972.) .
a b .
x/y y . ,
, (
) . ,
,
, y x .
30%
70% . ,
.
,
,
.
521
3. F (1 / b)
.
:
p
p
* f f * (1
)
100
100
(5)
(kPa) -
f (kPa) -
p(%) - :
k * l f
(6)
a k * l f * b
:
-
l f (mm)
(mm/kPa)-
b (1/kPa)
l f
(7)
a l f * b
p
(1
)
100
f
f , (6) (7) (8) :
p
k * (a b * l )
)=(
(1
100
a k * b * l
l f
l f
p
))
100
p
b*k *
100
(8)
(9)
a * (k (1
(10)
,
:
522
p
k (1
)
1
100
f
*
* ult C * ult
p
p
b
(1
) * (k 1)
(1
) * (k 1)
100
100
k (1
p
)
100
(11)
:
ult (kPa) b ..
C p k
f 0.818 * ult
p 20% k 4 , C = 0.777 , f 0.777 * ult
p 10% k 2 , C=0.818,
, ,
.
.
, ()
,
.
Brich Hansenove preporuke
max / ult 0.7 ( p 10%, k 2 ), 0.9
( p 20%, k 4).
( )
( 1 3 ) .
4.
USCS . CL, AASHTO
A-7-6 G=20,
.
1.
10%
1. ,
.
1.
D (mm)
<0.02
21
0.020.06
55
0.062.0
23
2.060
1
>60
0
(kN/m )
17.5
12.5
523
IP
IC
(%)
39.5
50
27
23
0.4
50kPa
1
1
56.8
ult
b 0.0176
f 0.818 * ult 45.6 kPa
kPa;
p 10% ,
k 2,
C=0.818=>
kPa;
p 10% ,
k 2,
C=0.818=>
kPa;
p 10% ,
k 2,
C=0.818=>
150kPa
1
1
132
b 0.00756
f 0.818 * ult 108 kPa
450kPa
1
1
323
ult
b 0.00310
f 0.818 * ult 264 kPa
ult
20 % 2.
,
.
50kPa
1
1
56.8
ult
b 0.0176
f 0.777 * ult 44.1 kPa
kPa;
p 20% ,
k 4,
C=0.777=>
kPa;
p 20% ,
k 4,
C=0.777=>
kPa;
p 20% ,
k 4,
C=0.777=>
150kPa
1
1
132
b 0.00756
f 0.777 * ult 103 kPa
450kPa
1
1
323
ult
b 0.00310
f 0.777 * ult 251 kPa
ult
524
1. 10 %
1. 20 %
525
3. c
3. ( c )
.
2. (c )
.
2.
P=10%
k=2
kPa)
kPa)
31
23
C (kPa)
(0)
31
28
P=20%
k=4
22
27
5.
10%
, 20%
.
.
, DK:624.041.61=861/
, / 49 (2006) 3-4 (67-71)
526
1, 2
SQUAT
:
squat ( 227 UIC
712) j .
.
squat ,
squat. 227
.
: 227 (squat),
TYPE
ON
RAILWAY
Summary:
This Professional paper contains recognition of terrain surrounding Pancevo Varos
railway station and analysis of rail defect known as "squat" (defect 277
categorization in accordance to UIC 712 [1]) visualy recognized by inspection of
main rail track. Professional paper contains data for Pancevo varos railway hub and
it connectivity with Belgrade railway hub. Based on what has been detailed
controled, statistical analysis of "squat" has been made. Analysis also includes
traffic loading action, type and layout of sleepers and rail steel fatigue represented
through SQUAT occurrence. As bottom line, treatment of rail defect type 227 has
been presented along with automated form filling for rail defect.
Keywords: rail defect type 227 (squat), railway station Pancevo Varos
1
2
527
2014.
,
. , ,
: ;
;
( );
; .
( 1) : ,
, .
1 -
, ( 2)
,
. ,
. ,
.
2 -
528
2
( 3).
: (18
km); K 10; ( 7); 1.9 (E-70):
; (40 km).
3 -
180 ,
.
-70 .
.
3
,
,, . (c 4)
km
18+210,00. .
5 ( 4) :
1. - ,
.
2. ,
.
3. ,
.
4. ,
. -.
529
4 -
49-300-6.
325, 20
t ( ) 6,4 t/m ( ).
2 3. 325 , 25
kV (50Hz). 491,
SKl-2 ,,
.
: 8
( 4 2 4 3), 18 (
2), 36 ( 23 2 13 3).
4
,
.
1:
,
,
( 6).
.
2: .
, ,
,
.
3:
( 6).
530
, ( 6)
.
~300m
6 -
4: .
, km 17+996,51
2,30 m.
300m .
5:
2 3 .
,, ,
,
.
5 (Squat )
(Rolling
Contact fatigue) .
. ,
squat
,
, .
Squat , R3000
m ,
. , .
"" ,
[3].
531
v 9.
, 3-5 mm
[4].
7 , squat
squat
"wheelburn" .
:
; ;
, , ,
Excel ;
squat .
6 227
:
squat head checking.
[2].
(Rolling Contact Defects - RCF).
, ,
,
. O " (339)
532
",
.
. UIC [1] [4]
,
.
6.1
. (,
,
),
. , ,
(), ,
()
, .
.
, ,
( 8).
8 3
. 9
. ,
. ,
.
533
9 3
6.2
" "
/.
.
: , ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
.
6.3 SQUAT
: 1.
squat , 2.
.
squat , ,
(),
( -) squat
.
squat . squat
. squat
SQ1, SQ2
.
1 squat 87%
2, 13% 3. 2
270 m 3
3. , squat 2
squat 3. 2
2 3 . 3
534
. 4 4 squat
. 15
cm . : 60 cm
60 cm. squat 0.2, 0.5 2
mm. 5 squat .
squat 2 3
.
10
6.4
.
.
,,, .
75% squat
,
[5].
,
squat .
INNOTRACK D4.2.4 [6], 74%
535
squat .
squat ,
( 4 4). squat ( 10 15%)
[3]. .
1 ,
, 2.
, squat 2.
3. , squat
. squat
. 2.
3.,
squat . squat
,
squat .
6.5 227
,
, .
squat : , ,
, ,
6 [3]. ,
. .
, squat
. squat
,
.
.
[1]
. .
squat
, xcel
.
UIC - International Union of Railways: "UIC Code 712 Rail Defects", 4th edition
. , . , 65 (2013), 251-259
International Union of Railways: "UIC Code 725 Treatment of rail defects", 2007
INNotrack D4.2.4, Improved model for loading and subsequent deterioration due to
squats and corrugation
536
1, 2
-
:
, 0-2
. ( 0-2 mm)
, - -
.
- -
: - , . ,-
.,-
- , -
1030 %,- -
, -
30 % .
: , - , a, ,.
1
, , , 73, 11000
, , @....
2
, ,
, 4, , , .@.
537
1.
, ,
Mg3Si2O5(OH)4. ,
, .
-2+0 mm.
,
, . ,
( )
- .
.
,
.
,
.
(,
) -
EN
- .
-
.
2.
. .
- , ( 0).
. . ,
, . 0-1,6
( 0-2 mm), 8
. - 1.
1. -
538
g
g
0-1,6
mm g
0-2
mm g
ml
:
I0
I1
I2
I3
I4
I5
I6
I7
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
7250
6250
5250
4250
3250
2250
1250
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7250
1845
1890
1980
2025
2070
2115
2160
2340
10845
10890
10980
11025
11070
11115
11160
11340
2.1.
:
- CEM II/B-M (S-LL)42,5 N "" , ,
- , "", , , ,
- 0-1,6 mm,
0-1,6 mm 2.
2. 0-1,6 mm
(mm)
2,0
1,6
1,0
0,50
0,250
0,125
g
0,0
0,5
154,0
828,0
570,0
300,0
150,0
%
0,00
0,02
7,69
41,35
28,46
14,98
7,50
%
100,00
99,97
92,40
50,10
22,50
7,50
0
0-2 mm,
0-2 3.
3. 0-2 mm
539
(mm)
2,0
1,6
1,0
0,50
0,250
0,125
g
7,0
104,0
650,0
540,0
250,0
156,0
293,0
%
0,35
5,20
32,50
27,00
12,50
7,80
14,65
%
99,65
94,45
61,95
34,95
22,45
14,65
0
-
, ,
, , ,
, , -
.
.
3.
3.1.
.
1,6 mm.
1100-1160 g/dm3. 4.
- 1.
4.
I0
I1
I2
I3
I4
I5
I6
I7
g/dm3
1.100
1.140
1.100
1.145
1.130
1.140
1.140
1.160
1.150
540
1. -
3.2.
175-185 ,
210-260 . 2.
2. :-
.
541
3.3.
,
3.
3. -
.
,
.
3.4.
5 . ,
0 , .
5. -
I0
I1
I2
I3
I4
I5
I6
I7
0
16,00
2,20
2,35
2,70
2,40
2,50
2,60
3,00
2,60
%
5 -
542
.
.
3.5.
DIN 18555 8
6.
6. -
I0
I1
I2
I3
I4
I5
I6
I7
(Standvermgen)
I0
I1
I2
I3
I4
I5
I6
I7
5
5
5
,
, I5, I6 I7
. I1, I2, I3 I4
.
(,
). ,
.
(
.
543
2- 3- . -
8.
8. -
I0
I1
I2
I3
I4
I5
I6
I7
2
3
3
,
,
.
F =m g
Malter
4.
,
. 4.
,
.
.
.
3.7.
-
28 9. 5 6.
544
9. -
28
MPa
28
MPa
I0
I1
I2
I3
I4
I5
I6
I7
0,73 2,26
3,07 2,69
1,54 1,15
2,92 6,76
6,45 6,16
6,06 5,95
5.
- (II1 II2)
,
. 0
,
. -
.
545
6.
-
- . II2 (
) 0, JUS U.M2.012.
5. 0 .
,
.
4.
, - ,
- .
:
1. -
, .
,
.
. -
33,33 % .
2. -
:
)
) .
) -
.
,
.
. +,
.
546
,
.
,
,
. 30 %
.
)
, .
-
.
.
3. -
. 30 %
BAS U.M2.012.
30 % ,
30% .
4. -
.
, .
5. -
.
.
6. .
.
7. -
.
.
8. ,
10-30 %.
9.
- 30 % .
, .
,
36017
: "
, ,
".
547
11.
1. ., . (), ,
- - , ,
, 2013.
2. . , , 1995.
3. , ., , . , - ,
, , , , , 1999.
4. . ,
, 1 2, , 2000.
5. H. Knoblauch, U. Schneider, Bauchemie , Werner-Verlag GmbH- Dsseldorff- 1995.
6. Andrea Glatthor, Strkeether als rheologisches Additiv in Trockenmrteln,
Schleibinger Rheologie-Kolloquium Regensburg, 2005
7. ,.
, , ,
, 1996.
8. , . ,
, 2008.
9. .. , . , .. , ,
2000.
10. , , ,
1990
11. Andrea Glatthor, Strkeether als rheologisches Additiv in Trockenmrteln,
Schleibinger Rheologie-Kolloquium Regensburg, 2005
12.
" " , ,
1989
13. Celluloseether zur Steuerung der Rheologie von Trockenmrtel, Wolff Cellulosics
GmbH & Co. KG, Walsrode Germany 2003
14. http://www.setylose.de/z_tds/TDS_e/TDS_Tylovis_SE_7_B_e.pdf,
Oitano:19.10.2010.
548
1, 2, .3, 4
2 - -
:
--
(NAMA National
Appropriate Mitigation Action)
(UNFCCC).
.
CO2 2
.
: NAMA, 2, , -
, ..., , , --
2
, UNDP
3
, . .., , , --
4
, . .., , , --
549
1
-- ()
.
, , ,
,
, a.
,
. 2008.
-
-. -
,
,
,
( ).
.
. 2012. .
-
(NAMA National Appropriate Mitigation Action) 2015.
,
(UNFCCC).
NAMA
,
, [1]. NAMA
GHG .
-,
2
,
.5
2.
2
(NEEAP) 2012.
,
. [2] 60% ,
80%. ,
,
[1].
NAMA Sustainable and energy efficient building of Faculty of architecture, civil engineering and geodesy
CO2
Carbon Forum Asia, 2015. , .
550
(SEAP)
2010.
1990. 1.457. 944,38 MWh, 2 664 322,94 t.
, 90% 2
, 10% . [3] 80 - 90%
, , , ,
.
, .
,
, . ,
,
,
.
25%
, .
0.55 t
CO2eq , 2025. .
,
4,2 t CO2eq [1].
,
, 2013. .
, ,
,
.
.
(Energy Performance of
Buildings Directive - Directive 2002/91/EC, EPBD) e
,
. 2002.
.
, 2010.
2030. , [4].
2013. ,
,
, , 2
,
, ,
, [5].
551
,
,
,
( 93.) [6].
(Covenant of Mayors) 2009.
(SEAP)
[3].
CO2 20% 2020. .
,
.
.
. ,
,
,
. .
3. -
-
-
.
,
, .
, -
,
, .
,
.
- -
.
CO2
2
. ,
0+,
.
.
,
, :
- 2 50%
2
,
;
552
- ,
;
-
;
- ;
-
;
- NAMA project;
-
;
-
.
4.
CO2
-,
15 kWh/m2 , 120
kWh/m2 , n50 0,6 h-1.
- .
, 2012. ,
3,5 l/s,
12 C,
15 C.
9,0 l/s. [7]
.
,
.
,
. 100 m/h
2,
100 m/h .
[8] ,
. ,
, U 0,8 1,1 W/m2K,
1 EN 12207/2001.
he Passive House Institute ,
. [7]
553
,
,
( )
,
,
.[8]
,
()
,
.
, 1.000 l
je
. [7]
,
, (Blue Green
Dream ) .
,
.
( , ).
.
.
,
, VAV
, .
0+,
. [7]
8.1 kWh/m2 14.8
kWh/m2 - +.
() - 107.463 kWh/. 1. [8]
1
/
/ kWh/m2
8.1
2.6
0.9
2.9
0.3
14.8
554
CO2
EN 15603,
.6
- 36 kWh/m2, 2
11 kg/m2.
, 36 kWh/m2
2 11 kg/m2, 74.6 t . [8]
, ,
2013. .
- 15.091.874,35 ,
2.147,39 /m2.
.
6.460.000,00 . ,
1 100 000 kWh/.
.
17.45 . ,
, ,
-
2. [8]
2 ,
14.8 kWh/m2
36
CO2
11 kg/m2
CO2
74.6 t/
CO2 (MtCO2e)
67.1 MtCO2e
15.091.874,35 M
2.147,39 M/m2
17.45
(fp) 0,50
CO2 (K) 7 kg/MWh,
(fp) 4,05 CO2 (K) 1340 kg/MWh.
2,45 CO2 740,15 kg/MWh. -
2014. , j 45%
55% ().
6
555
5.
,
2 -
, ,
.
, -
.
, ,
.
,
.
( )
45 - 60 kWh/m2,
CO2 (t/) 20 - 30% ,
7 . 2 - 2
, , 70%. 3. [8]
3
.
. .
CO2 / kg/m2
136.3
111.2
67.5
47.9
11
CO2 / t/
376.6
307
102.9
72.9
74.6
. CO2 / t/ /
757.4
/
326.2
74.6
CO2 / t/
/
682,8
/
251,6
/
%
/
90%
/
77%
/
[1]
Climate Change Adaptation and Low-Emission Development Strategy for Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Adapted by the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2013.
[2]
(NEEAP)
, 2012.
[3]
(SEAP), 2010.
[4]
, 2010.
[5]
, . . .59/13, 2013.
[6]
, . . .40/13, 2013.
[7]
, ,
- / .. , . , . //
- , , 2012.
[8]
/ .. // ,
- , , 2014.
556
1, 2, 3
BROWNINFO :
:
(. rownfields)
.
: , ,
. ,
,
. ,
BrownInfo.
: , a , ,
1
... , -o- ,
tvujicic@aggfbl.org
2
... , , , adjukic@rcub.bg.ac.rs
3
... , , , - o- ,
dsimonovic@aggfbl.org
557
BROWNINFO
BrownInfo -
(Methodological Framework for Development Of Brownfield Databases)
-- [1].
2014. 12
160 .
- (Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit),
,
, ,
,
, - ,
.
: . ,
- , ,
, ,
.
,
,
. BrownInfo - : 1)
, 2)
, 3)
,
4)
.
BrownInfo : 1)
BrownInfo, 2)
BrownInfo , 3)
,
,
4) ,
,
,
, 5) - Internatonal Academic Conference
BrownInfo 2014 , 6)
.
2
,
[2]:
558
,
;
;
, ,
,
;
;
,
;
;
( ), ;
,
, ;
; ,
;
.
3 BROWNINFO
BrownInfo -
.
, .
BrownInfo
, ,
,
, , ,
- .
BrownInfo
[1]:
559
, ,
, , ,
, ,
, BrownInfo ,
''
.
3.1
BrownInfo 4
.
:
[1].
BrownInfo ' '
: , ( 1.).
: ,
.
BrownInfo ' '. ,
/ ,
. ,
.
BrownInfo
( 1.). ,
, , , ,
[3].
.
,
.
. , (,
) -
.
,
.
, .
' ,
BrownInfo
- [3], [4], [5], [6] [7]
4
560
. BrownInfo
.
,
(, ),
, ,
.
1 BrownInfo (:)
(bottom-up), -
, , .
,
.
,
,
( 1.).
,
, , .
BrownInfo
.
, ,
.
, ,
, ad hoc .
.
.
.
561
4 BROWNINFO
BrownInfo
,
, .
:
,
, , ,
.
--
, - BrownInfo,
INOVA-
BrownInfo ..,
.
,
,
BrownInfo .
, ,
, . ,
, BrownInfo
BrownInfo ,
,
.
58 110 .
: www.geoinova.com/brf BrownInfo
(http://bit.ly/browninfo2014) ( 2.).
2.
(: www.geoinova.com/brf)
5 BROWNINFO
BrownInf :
, , /
.
562
,
BrownInf ,
.
. ,
Business Friendly Cities, ,
BrownInf
/ .
,
( /,
) ( ), BrownInf
. , BrownInf
(greenfield) .
,
.
BrownInf
.
( )
. ,
,
.
6
,
,
,
. , BrownInfo
' ',
. ,
,
.
BrownInfo
,
, .
.
, -
,
563
. -, ,
,
,
.
BrownInfo
,
.
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
CIP -
,
69(082)
624(082)
71/72(082)
-
(11 ; 2015 ; )
/ XI
- , , 14. 15. 2015. ;
,
... [ .] = Contemporary Theory and
Practice in Building Development / 11th International Scientific
Technical Conference, Banja Luka, 14 & 15 may 2015 ; organizers
Ministry of Spatial Planning Civil Engineering and Ecology of the
Government of the Republic of Srpska ... [et al .] ; [
; ... [ .]]. -
: : - ,
2015. - 588 . : . ; 25 cm
300. - . . - Summary.
ISBN 978-99976-642-0-4 ( )
1. ,
( ) 2. -
( ) 3.
( ) 4.
( ) 5. ( )
COBISS.RS-ID 5009432