(" #  $% " &     
)

(

 "
#  .
 
 

   
!" #$
%  &' ($


*+
0 1 23 2 4, -  $." $
 / $
 +,* )'
*

9 
 (!
8  9$:) 5  
 )
$
 6! &' &5 
$.> 23
  .('$<: . &5  !
 )
$

) 5 
0 - 2
  2
  5 
9  ?! !
8  9$: 

.&5 
!
 )
$
 9$: 
 2 6 23
@$ ' A
$.3 <

 2 6 23 2 &' A
 )
5 &' B 3 2   &5 

/  6/ 2 . @ )
5 &' B 3 2   '$<: . !
8 
)$C  2 6   -  )$C  4, &$0 $
  3
.

@$'  2! $
 D9
 )8< A$


:&
23 #$  AE #$5 4$< $ ?%  #$
: $ )$5
)
$5 5 23 % A  1'
 4,
  F'
 &* 

  G' 
  G'  23 ?! )
3 A4$< $ #$5 +,* <' ) .3 6
G'  2! *3   (&!
 

     H
I /)
.&
 H 
0 '
&' 

 
/  / 
 J$
  &' $<  ,*
$
/  / L
 J$
 $<

4, A&!
 

   08 ?
 $ 05 ?% +$
 B
3
 ,*
+,*
 $
)N

* 2 .4

 

  M
$ $
: )

" &' $05


& 2
! .

/
&!
 

  ! *3 ?! )
3 &   )
$
 B
O
.)
5

:
 +/  0 .2@
 2
 6/ 5  

 &' &  $*
G

H 5 23 5 23
 A
 ,* &' 4$
: 
P F  2 A
2 8 / -
P $<
 $.>
 Q$ ' ?!
I
3 )G$
 )
$

Organizational 5 
9  &' Organizational Justice 5  



 6 $
 /    (
 !  ) 2R ?  2 A Outcomes
H, ?! N
 A Mediator Variables -  )$C  Q $.> 5 &'
I$
I
   23 0 5  
 .
 2> [1] S$ 
'
)$C  Q $.> N @ &' 6 H $
 /  
'
 ,* &'
F T8  [1] 1
 4, S$  H, 23 ?% #$
<: 2
 
* .- 
$
)
 &  
 )
$
 '
 [2] 1 
 4, &/$
  
)
$
 23 ?! )
3 &  A5 
9  5  
 2 6
)
 I$

 (   $C  5  
 $
) 5  
 
 
?!
U
 A(F
$C ) 5 
9  &' 2
  . 2 $.3 $8 &'
.-  )$C  Q $.> 5 &' 
 6 $
#

!% #$ $@
$." $
 
 
  A $
 +,* *3 $05 H, ?! N

H, A5 
9 
 5  
 6! &' &5  0 - 
23 ?!
U :
* 3 A
 ,* &' 2 
* 2 . 2   ?! I

 !

U
 A[3] 5  
 )
$
 &' $.U &5  0
2 5 
9  ?! 2
  < $.U 
 2 8 / -
" 23 
.
& >  A[4] '$<: 5  &!
 

  )
6! &'
*$.> 6/
2 H, A 2 
 2 . 2   2 
  T  
 $
 +,*


  !  &' !
8  9$: 
 & $.>  23
0@$ ' 6/

 
 



 
 

    

 
   

/
&5  0 - 2

 F 2
  M  &'$<: &5  &!
 
.5

:
 2#+3  $% 24  .1
#
3 2! #$
! * :Organizational Structure     .-.1
.1 G$ A1 $ A+
 $
A 5  $
-%
06/ 2 M
&' 

  0 &* :Distributive Justice 5  6  .1.1
)
$
 2

! N$O  
$8 23 #$' ?!   A )X'
 Y/
.  2
 &' G  
 $' B
 $$
0
3 ?! & 
F  N$: 
! B
  0 :Procedural Justice  $%  .7.1
.)X'
 Y/ &'
'
8< $
?% $< :interactional justice 5 +4  .8.1
)$8  )
@  1
 B
 A1 U$ F F 
  &' (9$
.$ 
 0 
 2! 6
I @' A2 U$ '
  G6
$
 +,* &' $< :Organizational Outcomes     .9.1
$
 +,* G$  A
0
 5
0
 &  

 $Z
9  ?%
!
 2
 )
$
 AM$<
 . A
* -' 2. ?! Y
/ <
.&5 

theorical Background :#+    4+ .7

:Organizational Structure     ;4 .-.7
#$$  5  )
6 2 !  1> &5  0 [5]M$[ !
2

 2@  &5  0 23 $
<3 .5 N
@!3 2 9

G$) $$ ,
/  -
3 A5 
!  :
.  ?!
0  
2 6
I 
I@3 <
 .5 N
@!3 2 9
 )
  A(G$6
.19
@!3 2 9
 )
6  &  $ $Z 3 $  

& 2
! .

F !
8  &5  0 23 
 )
$
 2

 )$053

+,* .&5  N
" &' $.U (- $C ) !     2 ! 

   A[7] &5   A [6] &9 $C  :)@  
18 &5  0 S$- 1! .[9] 5   $  A[8] \
:
.+,*
 $
&' - $C  1 $

I0 I$
/ +$
 !

&  H &* A
I$
%
0! M$
    )
8  G$3 2 

 5  
0
* :2
3 2!  ?% 5  
0 M
5  
0
' .[10] organic  @ 5  
0 mechanistic
A$ $Z $

!   -$ $ 
* 2! #$
! &* 

6
I @' A -' $0 ) 
I'
I
! '
 )
  F A G$  -
T


 F A$$ ,
/  !  $ )
 ]9 
 2!
5 
0   @ )
5 23
 A 

 .&85  M 
$ - -/ 2  AG$6 6  2 
! $
 F  A$
]9   A$  8
  ) 
 F AI
 @ 3 -
2 .[10] M
*" G
% &' 2
 #
!
  ?% $ )
 
2
 
0 26. 5  
0 2 2- 2,* 2> 
 ,* &'
>  0


 

*$
 ! 2 5 3 F  &'
   A
I
 2

!
 
2   '
 &' \$
 )
5 5 23

% A 

  @! 3
.(2
 2- 6 2 Y9
/ Q
0
) 2

!
  2

0 2
*

:        .1.7



 &' 4$
:  1 4, $ $
*
G 2 Z$ ?!
$
 )
 )
$
 2 I
   13 % A@

 6/ 5 

 )
$
 &' $.>  &' (&5  0 
/) 5  9 1 4,
D9
 Q 1 $053
 * $C  H, $
*3 2
G
  .5 
?' A&5  0 9$: 
 2 6 $
*3  .


 
 



 
 

    

 
   

)

 9$: 
 2
 )
$
 23 [11] $
)@ 3
. 
9 $
*3 ?! [12] $
)
3
 A &5  0 - 2
 F

 )$C    $
3 &' &5  0
 A 5 

/  8 / $
 H
* 2> [13] D   A .
 $.3 $
&' .5 
.8 / 5  )
9 &' )N$: 
! B
 ?! 
)$
<3 &  $5 )$   Q
  
 ,* &' #$
<: $

.5  
 2
 )
$
 &' &5  0 $.>

  ?%
- $ 


$'" (
% 23 )$  )$   +,* A [14] [15] [16]

 23 [16] S$ 
.  ?' A 5 &' &5  0 -
I9G

 A5 &'
9

 &5  0 - -   2 
 5 
4
U 23 2
0 , &5  0 N
 &' 
/  $- 2> [14] S$ 
H, AG  9$: 
 2
 )
$
 
Z 3 $ 05 ?%
I9

A $
< A5  )
6 A
!  . A)
5 0 Y9
/ 2O'

 )
$
 < &'
I
* I$
 23 2 A)
 2
*$Z
&' $.U &5  0 23 [17] Q$ '
' - (8 ?! .5 

0@ &  9$:
!  N @ &' 13 H, A5  
 2
 )
$

.5 /

 $' B
 ?!    &5  0
)
6/3 A
 &5  0 2 6  $
&'
23 A 8 /
IG 3 ?-
$ 8 / 9$:
!  23 [11] B3$ 
23 [18] S$ 
' 1! N
 .$/R M  2 M /
$ 8 / 2G " H
2
 23 2 9$: 
 ?!  &'
0!

    &  $

.5 &5  0 &' 

*$
 !

2 G  9$: 
 [11] )6 23 ?% #$
<: $
 2

I.
 $05
 !

8  
  08 2" H, A 
 9$: !
8 

"

& 2
! .

*" &' $.U 23 2 5 9 23  $  2, 2.

 2

!
 ?!
.5  
 2 !
8  9$:

P 2

0  &  

 _ @   
 )
$
 Q$  N @ &' &



0%
  &  8 / $

 2%" :
    2 5 

0
*,/ &  -
" 2
  2
  5  
 0
$
 &' 2 

2   2
 23
@$ '
'  +,* ?! N
 .")
5 &' 5 

 A5  
0 2 #

 -
3 5 &' 9$: 

I$
% $.3
.5  
0 2 B$/3 -
3 5 &' !
8  

I$
% $.3 2  
0 2 6 )@$ &  $5 
" #$. 2 Z$ ?!
 .
I$ H, )$ / &  
" &' #$
 H
* 23 % A
 &5 
0 2 6 ]@ < )' &  (
 ! ) #
  $



P #$<
 )$.>  )8<  &  [3] $
&* 
 &5 
&  )
5 23 [3]
  .5  
 )
$
 &' !   0

! $.3
03 ?!
0$
% 
 $
: G$6 2 $3 $
 ) 

0$
% 

I  $C" )
5 23 .G$ )
5
 $
 9$%
. D9
 +,* 23 H<  .#$ )
5 2 !
8 
! $.3
*$
 !

.
 &5  0 2 6 - 0' &' ? " # -/ . 23 2
Q M / $
 +,* 2 M
0 23 ?% #$
<: $
 2
)
 Q $
$
 ! 2 ,/> 23 2 
I
' A[3] $
2! N&<

 2O' A (&5   A$ AG$) . A&5  0

I
 6
I * +$
 !
 H, A&5  0 
I < $.3 M ?! G$

" &' &5  0
I! < $." M   H, A
I @! 3

 &.
 2 +$Z [3] $
)G$
 AB$/3 
 2 .4$
:
2O' A5  
 )
$
 &' &5  0 $<
 $.>   5 
&' - $C  &5  0 $

I
3  $
 +,* 
 *

 
 



 
 

    

 
   

. &5  !


) 5 
9 
 5  
 )
$
 6!
.(M$<


:        $%  .7.7

23 ?%  A 9$: 
 &' &5  0 $.> [18] a

    1! N
 .
 )
5 &'
I @ $.3 )
 9$: 

)
5
 $
 
 )
5 &'
I @ $.3 9$: 
 23
. @

 N
C% * 
 )
5 5 &
" M
0 23

-

!  ?! $3 <

 ! 6/ 2 $$ ,
/  &' &
: $ $

$

0  $05  $ )N$: 23
 H, A$ )N$:

$'" )
$
 2O' &

 A5  
 +N @ &' [  &  &
"
.9$: 
 ?!
I
3 G$  )
5 H &' 2


:<=      +4  .8.7


/ H 2!
I
 M /  @ )
5 - 23 H<
)
8 ?!
I
3  @ )
5
   A 
 )
5

)6!
8  A $ $Z 
$ 5 A#$<
 )
 
 A !
8 
.[19]
*$Z /<
2 &* &  AI


0%
$<3 &  !
8    2> H< 
2 !
8    *3 #

G ?% 4
U  A @ )
5 Y9
/
  .)
5 H &' !
8  
  *" #

G &

 A



I$
% $.3 2    @ )
5 &'
$'" 2> 
 S$  H,
.
 )
5 &' 2  2, 09$5 $
 !
8 

;5 5        "   .9.7

: /% & >  


& 2
! .

5  
 2 8 / -

" 23 ?!
U 
 <
 2%
5 &'
9
 &5  0 - N @ &' H, A*3 3 3 $.3 2  
2 8 / -
" 2> 5  
 .
 )
$
 Q )8<
 A
$.3 < .8 / 5 
9  &' 8 / )$.>
0 2 
 

F $3 6! ?! )
 9$: 
 23 2! )
$
 +,* )8<
' I


$3 6! ?! !
8  
 )

 A5
 - $ 5 
9 
2 .
 $.3 
3 &' .&'$<: 
 F - $ 5 
9  F
/
&!
 

  )
6! &'
I
%
$.3
 !
8  9$: 
 23

I8 [4] 
 A)

6 +,0 
$.3 $
 / &' A [21] A[20] A[1] 5
5  
 6! &' &!
 

  -  $.P
I@ I$
 /
5  D9
 &' )$.3
 9$: 
 23 
  .5 
9 

)$.3 2 &' A(  H$
  A&5  G  .) 5
 - $
)
  . ) &'$<: 

 - $ 5 
9  &' !
8  


 2 6 23 ?! *
> H, 2 *3 $." .(5  - 

$'" 2 &!
 

  6! ! 
0-
 5 
9  9$:
!
8  
 2 6
3 .(&5  !

$'" )
$
 ) 5

$'" 2 9
 &!
 

  6! ! 
0-
' 5 
9 
2>
I
 Q$ '  13

- .(1 U$
9
 2

  ! ) 0'$<

 23 A
 )
5 &'
I @ $.3 2   9$: 

4,
G  +
  2O' A @ )
5 &' I
 @ $.3 2   !
8 
6! !  1
$
 &' $.U 23
 A
 2 $/E 3 _ 
$8 1 

 2 

! 13 ? .5 /

0 F@/ &  &!
 

 
)
6! H$
: $3 
 0
 2  
$'" 2O' AI
 @ $.3 9$:
2 &'
 $
 0
 2   A 5
 
/ 5  &!
 

 
!
8  
 2 

!
3 .

 
<3 2 < ,0 - $ )
 

 
 



 
 

    

 
   

  )
6! H$
: $3 
 0
 2  
$'" 2O'
I @ $.3
,0 - $ )
  2 &'
 $
 0
 2   A'$<: &!
 
A 
 )
5 &' 1> F  2 H, .

 
<3 2 <
&!
 

  )
6! !  9$: 
 2   6! H
* 2 

 2   6!
 2  F 
' A @ )
5 &'
3 .5 
.'$<: &!
 

  )
6! !  !
8 

*

 ! 2 )$
/ #
! 2.
 B
 2> [1] S$ 
' AI$/3
4,
*
3 $
 /
 
 
  A5 /
&!
 

  ! E
perceived

H$
 &5  !
 6/ 2 &!

 

  ! ?% $5

2 '$<: &!
 

  ! ?% $5
 A organizational support
. supervisory trust '$<: . 6/

:      6  .?.7

$

I
 )8Z3

03 
 )
$
 Q$  6/ 2 56
6!
 * H, $8
  A&5  0 G  
 2 6
2 
I
 5 /
4

 

  ! F G  
 . -
 $
&'
0   $
43

  ]$
 A&!
 

  ! F
0-
 $
$

 
 F   1! .
0   &  $
 )$C  2 6


  ! )$C  G  
 6! &' &5  0 -
.&!
 

:
 @0 .8
:
 M
*" T ?% $
 ?

 2 6 $
)
 &  )

" 
" Q$ 
.5 
9  5 

d3


& 2
! .

0 5  
 2! 

 #$<
 $
.R $
 / d
 !
 )
$
 A'$<: .) 5 
9  ?! &5
 .(&5
)5  
 6! &' &5  0 -  $." $
 / d

 
*G 4, A$
 (9$ M
0 . * A5 
9
!.
 )
$
 2
*$Z 2

:
 2 = .9
$ < &' ]@  \,  6/ 2  )
@$' ]@ 2
)( .T
 4$5 Q$ ?! I

 ! 1 Z
 ) 4,

:A   =4 .-.9

"("   "  C5 "5
  ; 2  $%
 ." = 2 &     2

:   =4 .1.9

"("   "  5 C5 "5
 5/% &  +4
."    2 &  = 2

) (

?.

::#
 

 &'  5 W ?! 2!G   W 2 9 <! ! $

 /


) !   ! @ A AF A9G #$
 A
) )
U



 
 



 
 

    

 
   

 )
$
 - 2

 
  6/ 2 0
    .( 


! f A 
  () FG   .$
 M
0 
/ 
  e
)C
 .g b.L 
 
 A
  WW   
 )

 
4$! -  .gW 
:  )C
 A g ^W  &' $ , 
.
 0
5 &'  2  ^. f #$/ )  -  A W^.

:
 2  E  .D

/ 
 
 
 :Organizational structure + +

$'  $
( 
G )$
!  2 2   4, [22] (


" 2   &' 4 @ 3 &
 &5  0 Y9
/
&'
0
/   &  )$
 .3 2 .$
 F@  )
5
:(

&'
  4$
%  3 _
 % ?! #$
:  2 $ $$% H
* 
.'
  )

2 
! $
 5 #$
%
0 &  $
: 
"  
.$6
. $ 
! $
 &
$ 
5 #$
: F 
 $ 2 
! $
?! &
$ 
5 #$
: F 

 (
 
 
 :Organizational Justic + +

2   4, A [23] (
 ?! I

 ! (9$: A!
8 ) 5 
)$
!  A9$: 
 $' $
(
 )$
!  2
A)
5 &' 
" 2   &' !
8  
 $' $
(

/ A M$< B
 !
8  
 (

0
/  
0 $3
2 .$
 F@  )
  &' M$< B
 !
8  #N
8 (

:9$: 
 (

0
/ 

 &  )$
 .3
.F ?! )
. < 5  )N$: T-   


& 2
! .

.G  
 5  #
  &'   )N$:  

:!
8  
 (

0
/ 

 &  )$
 .3 2
.
U $- F F $<
 &9$ 
  
.$ 
 F F $<
 &9$ 
  
2
 '
 F $<
 &9$
0$ &  )
  M 
.*G

'$<: . (
 
 
 :Supervisory trust + +

B
 (
 #$
! #$<!
3 2 2   4, A[24] (
 ?! I

 !
.3 2 . $
 5  )
  &' 0'$< 2 U$ .
:'$<: . (

0
/ 

 &  )$

&  )6<  $<
 &9$ F 
 $  3 23 F- 3 
.&% _
  &' 1 Z$ &
% F  &' &0
.F $ 
 $<
 &9$ ?5 

 :Perceived Organizational Support + +

A[25] (
 ?! I

 ! &5  !
 2
 )
$
 (
 


0
/ 

 &  )$
 .3 2 A )$
! 2
. 2 2   4,
:H$
 &5  !
 (

.< > &!  $ ' &
!
 ?% 5 _$0 
.&*
 5  2 I

<
I$
I9
(3 

:;
 3#% G+
 .F
$
   3 
/ 
 
 
 $
 )
@$' $
 /
(hierarchical moderated regression analyze) -  )$C  4, &$0

M
0 A \,
 .6. $
  
  ASPSS10 &9
: D
$ 
/ 
 H,
  $C  $<
 $.>    $
 / (base model) " \, 


 
 



 
 

    

 
   

3 \,  &' '$<: .) F

 $C  &' (9$: 
 !
8  
)
(reduced

&
. \,  &'
3 A ( \,  &' &5  !
 )
$


$.>  $
 / (&5  0) -  $C 
/
O 
 

' model)
$
 / M
0' (full model) 
. \, 
3 A\,  &' $C  ,0 $<

!
8 ) 5  
 (- $C ) &5  0 2 !
8  $.>
.&5  !
 )
$
 '$<: . 2  &'
*$.> &' (9$:
:$
 \,
 Z
 
 Q$ &
'

:
T = + b0I + e (base model)
T = + b0I + b1S + e (reduced model)
T = + b0I + b1S + b2SI + e (full model)

:
.('$<: .) F
 $C  : T
.(!
8  
)   $C  : I
.(&5  0) -  $C  : S
.'$<: .
 !
8  
 6! &' &5  0 -  $.>  : SI

:
O = + b0P + e (base model)
O = + b0P + b1S + e (reduced model)
O = + b0P + b1S + b2SP + e (full model)

:
.(&5  !
 )
$
) F
 $C  : O
.(9$: 
)   $C  : P
.(&5  0) -  $C  : S
!
 )
$
 9$: 
 6! &' &5  0 -  $.>  : SP
.&5 

:
 2 =  .H
:A   =4 #3  .-.H
W

& 2
! .

9$: 
 2 6 23 $
 ? " @$8

I' 
 F
)
5
 $
 
 )
5 &' B 3 2   &5  !
 )
$

4, &$0 $
  N$O 
 @$8 +,*  $
 / . @
\,
 .6. $
 D9
 2 $
 6/ 2 (HMRA) -  )$C 
\, 
 " \,  M$  () $

0
 

  $
6
A&5  !
 )
$
 9$: 
 2 #$<
 6 $
 / &
"
0 $<
 $.>  $
 / G / \, 
 &
. \,  M$


3 A&5  !
 )
$
 &' A 9$: 
 '
@% $8 $C  &5 

 F &5  0 !
8 $.3 $
 / 
 \, 
 M$' 
.
, G / \,  2> D9
 )8<
 A &5  !
 )
$
 &' 9$:
2!
G . $

! (^.W)  \,  F  )C  A9
% 

B
3 \,  &'   $C  &5  0
/
% 2O' H, A ( cc.c)



  
  )C  \,  $8  #$
 &' M8- _
8 $
D9
  $<
 A &
" \, 
 $
 ( )
*$
 #

G ( L.)
0 $<
 $.>    ?% ( T $
 /
' )
 &' @ 
. $

! &5  !
 )
$
 ?! \,  &'   $C  &5 
&5  0 2   
$- 6!
 56
 A ( cc.c) 2!
G

0%
 &  D9
 +,* .(  $
 
) &5  !
 )
$

 ?' .&5  0  ) &  
 
" 2

! F T
-
3 2 
 )
  F )'$
 
 
0 23 [26]

.
2! 6
I @' A5  )
!$ 2 ?!3 $
A2$
 2
 2 !
8 
Q
3 H, '
@% .)6!
8  H ?!
0 $- Q$' #$
: )

$ $
&' C
 F  $ 
  &  5  
0 23 2.

.&5  !
 0
$
 Q
8/ &

 A 2
 $ 8 #

G 4
U  A



 
 



 
 

    

 
   

)C   \,    2! 

 \,  $
 D9
 )8<

$< A ( cc.c) 2!
G . $

! (b.W)  \,  F 
_
8 $ B
3 \,  &' (&5  0) -  $C 
/
% 23 ?% D9

#

G ( b.)


  
  )C  \,  $8  #$

0 $.>  
U
 * . G / \, 
 $
 ( W.L)
*$

!
 )
$
 9$: 
 2 6 ?! - $C  &5 

 2 6 &' - $C  &5  0 $.3 2
>  .&5 

 B$3 A$
 F@  )
5 &' &5  !
 )
$
 9$:
2  &5  !
 )
$
 9$: 
 2 6 $
 
H9 " $/E A &
 &5 0 M &  $
: )
  &' 2


 H, A 4 @! &5 0 M &  $
: )
  &' 2

.() $
 1@ 
(-) ; $
I55  

  ; 2

 
T

M
< 

8.-8
N.F
7.?8

N.NH
N.NH
N.N1

 JK


#L

% DF.1
-NF.7D
N.NNN

N.7?
N.N-N
N.NF

6 JK
 
T

>-/
4$




#L

8.-9

1.F8
__

N.N9
N.N7
__

N.-H
N.NF
__

% 98.D
?D.-7
N.NNN



 JK
 
T

>-/
4$




#L

+&
 2 5 

7.9F
__
__

N.N9
__
__

N.-?
__
__

. $%  ..    .1

5 $%  4 .7
.    I
Adj.R2   # 

% 97.D
DD.19
N.NNN

F  
JK  

&' $.> $.3 9$: 
 23 ?%
 &' #
$  D9

 $<
$
 
 )
5 &' 2

$'P 
 &5  !
 )
$




  
 f  A  @ )
5 &' 2
 09$5

 ( ^.) 
 
 )
5 &' 2
 
 (bb.b)
4  $.> 
 ?!
U 4, $" . @ )
5 &' 2

L


& 2
! .

!
 )
$
 9$: 
 2 6 - $C  &5  0
 .&5
(1) ; $

adj. R2
F

. .
.

. .
.

% .
.
.

% .
.
.

:
+    =4 #3  .1.H
!
8  
 2 6 23 $
 
. @$8
I' 
 F
.
 )
5
 $
  @ )
5 &' B 3 2   '$<: .
)$C  4, &$0 $
  N$O 
 @$8 +,*  $
 /
 (W) $
 &' ]@  *
  D9
 )8<
 A(HMRA) -
>(^.)  \,  F  )C  9
% 
, G / \,  2
!




  

' \,  $8 A (cc.c) 2!
G . $
)^D9
 $< ('$<: .) F
 $C  &' 
 4, $C  2 ( LW.
 @ '& 
$C  &5  0 $<
 $.>    
! ?%
  '&  
 \,  $
 D9
 )8<
 .'$<: . ?! \,
!. $

! (bb.c)  \,  F  )C   \,    2
0 !
8 ) -  $C 
/
% 23 ?% D9
 $< A ( cc.c) 2!
G
 \,  $8  #$
 _
8 $ B
3 \,  &' (!
8  
 F &5
 $
 ( )
*$
 #

G ( .^)


  
  )C

^

   
 



 
 

    

 
 


 ?! - $C  &5  0 $.>  
U
 * . G / \,
.'$<: . !
8  
 2 6

- .
- .
-

.
__
__

2
Adj.R
F

.
__
__

)(

T
.

__
__

.
.__

% .
.
.

.
.
__

% .
.
.

T
.

.
__

.
.
.

.
.
.

% .
.
.

 >

 2 6 &' - $C  &5  0 $.3 2
 
 B$3 A$
 F@  $
: )
  &' '$<: . !
8
 
2  '$<: . !
8  
 2 6

  $

H9 " $/E A &
 &5 0 M &  $
: )
  &' 2


 H, A 4 @! &5 0 M &  $
: )
  &' 2
 @
 23 ?%
 &' #
$  D9
 $<  .() $
 1
  @ )
5 &' 2

$'P 
 '$<: . $.> $.3 !
8



  
 f  A 
 )
5 &' 2
 09$5 $

)$C  &5  0 4  $.> 

U 4, $" .( b.c
$
: )
  &' '$<: . !
8  
 2 6 ?! -

 @.$
 F
(8) ; $



T
.


& 2
! .

.

adj. R2
F

% .
.
.

% .
.
.

< ?! &5  0 -  $." ]@  () $

< ?! &5  0 -  $." ]@  (W) $

! .&5  !
 )

$
 9$: 
 6

!-/ $<  .'$<: .

 !
8  
 6

<
 A&
 &5  0 ?% $  -/ $

 -/ $<

 A&
 &5  0 ?% $

<.4 @ &5  0 ?% F-  -/ $

 .4 @ &5  0 ?% F-

.
.
.
.
.

_
_
.
..
. .
. .

. .
. .
. .
_
_
.+++++++++ +++++++++

. .

.
.
%
) (
.
.
.
.
.

:
 Q / .-N
 <!
 )
$
 9$: 
 2 6 23 ?% $
 D9
 $
 )  @ )
5
 $
 
 )
5 &' B 3 )
 &5
A(&
 &5  0
 Y
/ $
 -/  #
  $ < $05
*9$: 
 2 8 $ )
  H
* 2 

! 13 ?% $< ,
b

 
 



 
 

    

 
   

&' 2

$'" 2O' A ($ )N$: 
 2.  $<

!)
&5  !
 )
$
 2 8 $ )
  2 $05 
 )
5


!
3 . @ )
5 &' 09$5
*$05 &  H 2 ?!3 2 

! 
 2.  $ <) 9$: 
 2 @8/ )
  H
* 2 
2 $05 
 )
5 &' 2

$'" 2O' A($ )N$:

*$05 &  H 2 3 2  &5  !
 )

$
 2 @8/ )
 

 &   D9

 +,* 23 H<  . @ )
5 &' 09$5
23 )@ 3 &  1 $
&' [11] 1
 4, 4$5 $
-: F T8
0%
A&5  0 < 2
 F )

 9$: 
 2
 )
$

2G " H 23 A 8 /
IG 3 ?-
$ 8 / 9$:
!  23
    1! N
 .$/R M  2 M /
$ 9$:
!  8 /
$
 
 )
5 &'
I @ $.3 2 
 9$: 
 23
. @ )
5

)
 '$<: . !
8  
 2 6 23 ?% $
 D9
 $< 
< $05 ) .
 )
5
 $
  @ )
5 &' B 3
$< ,* A(4 @ &5  0
 Y
/ $
 -/  #
 W $

$'" 2O' !
8  
 2 8 $ )
  H
* 2 

! 13 ?%
'$<: . 2 8 $ )
  2 $05  @ )
5 &' 2

2" H, .
 )
5 &' 09$5
*$05 &  H 2 ?!3 2 
$Z )
5  ?!
*

 ! A
0  $ 6/ 2 A  @ )
5

 AI
 @ $.3 /< )6!
8   A #$<
 )
  A $
H
* 2 

!
3 .)6!
8  2 _  ,* 
 2
 )
$
 2
G
)
5 &' 2

$'" 2O' A!
8  
 2 @8/ )
 
H 2 3 2  '$<: . 2 @8/ )
  2 $05  @
.
 )
5 &' 09$5
*$05 & 

c

& 2
! .


 &' &5  0 $<

 $.> 
  $
 23 2 Z$ ?! 
2! M< (L) $
 &' @  -
 $: )
6 23 % A5 
.5  

<3 2 43 &5  0 2 #$<
 6!
 
!

0*   &  )

5 23 )$053 &  [3] $
F Q$
  ,*

! $.3
03 ?!
0$
% 
 $
: G$6 2 $3 $
 &5 

0$
% 

I $C" )
5 23 .G$ )
5
 $
 9$%
  23 2 .
I $" )
5 2 !
8 
! $.3
*$
 !

2 $

  23 A$
 H D9
 $
 +,* D9
 2 M6 / ,*


0
 &' [3] $
)
 !
' A

I8 /
I


/ 
A.
 $." [23] (
 ?! I

 ! 
 (

 A[27] (
 ?!
F &5  0 -' )
 $3 6! $
?! [3] $
)



" &' 
I  
I < $.3 M 
/ 
 
 
 A5  

.2 $

 D9
 &' M6 /  $8

 * A4$
:
5  5 # " N  #$ *3
0 

0%  &  D9
 2% 
2) 5 +  #  (4$
: 
P
I'
@%
I$5
I!


03 $
 !
)

9  2 &' *
!
 ! )
0  )
5 4$

G
03 6/
" .('$<: . A&5  !
 )
$
 T 
'
I  /) 5 
)
3 &  [12] $
D9
 !
$
 +,* )N
 A    #
$
3 &' &5  0
 A 5  9 $
*3 ?!
H
* 2> )
3 &  [13] $
 H, .5  
 )$C   
5  )
9 &' )N$: 
! B
 ?!  
/  8 / $

23 )
3 &  A [11] $
1% )

I!

 $

 H, .8 /
23 Z$ .8 / 5  
0 &' 8 / 2G 3 ?!  
 $


  )$.>  23 % A
 6 $<
 $.> 
  $
 +,*

 2 .
 D9
 !
5 
9  ?! !
8  9$: 




 
 



 
 

    

 
   

 4$
: 
" &' F
 H

* 2
 13 *3 $.3 2 
 AB$/3
A Q 0@ 2! !
8  
 9$: 
 & 08 6  
!
23 % A #
  2
0 26<
*$
 !
 2.
 Q
0% $5 

9  ?! 
 2 2
 2- 2
  $.>  
 $
1 8<

2!
3 .Q 2!
0@ 2 08 6  
I-
 6
I 

 5 
&'  )$
: ?! S$ 
03 &' . ' A  
 2 D9
 *3
5  
 )
$
 2  '

* $
% )

 T-  )Z$ 
03
&' $
2 1
 &5  0

I
3  0 23
0' A
0
! B

23 &' &
 F
- ), )
5 )Z$  6
I .' .)
$
 +,* Z


 $ )

 Z

0' A

! )
5
0>
085  
3 $05
&' 2 
 1!
U 4, 
 - * A9$:
0 
! ( & 

3 $05 23 &' 4 @ F
- ), )
5 )Z$ 
3 .)
5 H

0'$< $
?!

I
3 G$ 23
0' A

! )
5
03 ?!
085 
+$
 4, A 0 U$ F &/< !
8  0 !
' 0 
 #

G
H &' 2 
 1!
U 4, 
 - * A!
8 
0 
! (
.)
5

1. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp,
D. E. (2001). Self-enhancement
biases,
laboratory
experiments, George Wilhelm Friendrich Hegel and the
increasingly crowded world of organizational justice. Journal
of Vocational Behavior, (58), 260 272.
2. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice
in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, (86), 278 324.
3. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). The
effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural
fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, (85) , 294 304.
4. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor,
M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The



& 2
! .

differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work
relationships. Academy of Management Journal,(43),73848.
5. Donaldson, L. (1996). The normal science of structural
contingency theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord
(Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 5776).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and
environment. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
7. Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C.
(1969). The context of organization structures. Administrative
Science Quarterly, (14) , 91114.
8. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis
of organizations. American Sociological Review,(32),19408.
9. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters
in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
10. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of
innovation. London: Tavistock.
11. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity
theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis
(Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research
(pp. 2755). New York: Plenum.
12. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of
procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
13. Tyler, T. R. (1996). The relationship of outcome and
procedural fairness: How does knowing the outcome influence
judgments about the procedure? Social Justice Research, (9),
311325.
14. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal
and informational classes of organizational justice. In R.
Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching
fairness in human resource management (pp. 79 103).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Keeley, M. (1988). A social contract theory of organizations.
Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
16. Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton, J. W. (1993).
Organizational justice: The search for fairness in the
workplace. New York: Lexington Books.
17. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in
organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In L. T.


 
 



 
 

    

 
   

Robertson & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), International review of

industrial and organizational psychology, (pp.317372).
New York: Wiley.
18. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2001). Are flexible
organizations the death knell for the future of procedural
justice? In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace II:
From theory to practice (pp. 229 244). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
19. Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997). Competing by
design. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior
and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, (37),
656 669.
21. Pillai, R., Schriescheim, C. A., & Williams, E. S. (1999).
Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational
and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of
Management, (25), 897933.
22. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of
small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic
Management Journal, (10),5 87.
23. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L.
H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A metaanalytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Journal of Applied Psychology, (86), 425 445.
24. McAllister, D. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as
foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations.
Academy of Management Journal, (38), 24 59.
25. Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997).
Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment,
and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, (82),
812 820.
26. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The
management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M.
Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9),
pp. 289 319).
27. Tyler, T. R., & Schuller, R. (1990). A relational model of
authority in work organizations: The psychology of
procedural justice. Unpublished manuscript, American Bar
Foundation.

W

& 2
! .

Testing The Organizational Structure As Moderator

Variable In The Relationship Between
Organizational Justice and Organizational
performance Outcomes
By
Dr. Abdelmohsen =assani
Business Administration - Aleppo University

Abstract
Organizational justice researchers recognize the important
role organization context plays in justice perceptions, yet few
studies systematically examine contextual variables. This article
examines how 1 aspect of context organizational structureaffects
the relationship between justice perceptions and 2 types of social
exchange relationships, organizational and supervisory. The author
suggest that under different structural conditions, procedural and
interactional justice will play differentially important roles in
determining the quality of organizational social exchange (as
evidenced by perceived organizational support [POS]) and
supervisory social exchange (as evidenced by supervisory trust). In
particular, the author hypothesized that the relationship between


 
 



 
 

    

 
   

procedural justice and POS would be stronger in mechanistic

organizations and that the relationship between interactional justice
and supervisory trust would be stronger in organic organizations. The
author results support these hypotheses.

L